IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA JOHN PARSONS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant. ___________________________________/ CASE NO. 16-2017-CA-001263-XXXX-MA DIVISION CV-E PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, JOHN PARSONS, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(a), moves the Court for an order granting summary judgment against Defendant, the CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. As shown herein, there is no genuine issue of material fact, and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS 1. The grounds on which this motion is based are stated with particularity in Plaintiff’s Complaint for Declaratory and Temporary and Permanent Injunctive Relief (the “Complaint”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. 1 As shown in the Complaint, the HRO is null and void for failure to comply with Florida Statutes, the Jacksonville Ordinance Code, and the Rules of the Council of the City of Jacksonville. (Compl., ¶¶ 1-22.) 2. The substantial matters of law to be argued are principally set forth in the Complaint, and additional such matters are set forth herein. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Complaint. Filing # 54133468 E-Filed 03/23/2017 02:57:59 PM
23
Embed
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, …lc.org/.../2017/032317JaxHROMotionForSummaryJudgment.pdf · in the circuit court, fourth judicial circuit, in and ... in the circuit
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA
JOHN PARSONS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA,
a municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Florida,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
CASE NO. 16-2017-CA-001263-XXXX-MA
DIVISION CV-E
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, JOHN PARSONS, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(a), moves
the Court for an order granting summary judgment against Defendant, the CITY OF
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA. As shown herein, there is no genuine issue of material fact, and
Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS
1. The grounds on which this motion is based are stated with particularity in Plaintiff’s
Complaint for Declaratory and Temporary and Permanent Injunctive Relief (the “Complaint”),
which is incorporated herein by this reference.1 As shown in the Complaint, the HRO is null and
void for failure to comply with Florida Statutes, the Jacksonville Ordinance Code, and the Rules
of the Council of the City of Jacksonville. (Compl., ¶¶ 1-22.)
2. The substantial matters of law to be argued are principally set forth in the
Complaint, and additional such matters are set forth herein.
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Complaint.
Filing # 54133468 E-Filed 03/23/2017 02:57:59 PM
2
3. The summary judgment evidence on which Plaintiff relies consists of the Affidavit
of John Parsons in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, attached hereto as MSJ
Exhibit A (the “Parsons Affidavit”), the Affidavit of Roger K. Gannam in Support of Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, attached hereto as MSJ Exhibit B (the “Gannam Affidavit”), and
Complaint Exhibits A, B, and C.
ADDITIONAL SUBSTANTIAL MATTERS OF LAW TO BE ARGUED
4. Summary judgment must “be rendered forthwith if the pleadings and summary
judgment evidence on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the
moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); see Florida
Bar v. Greene, 926 So.2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006).
5. When a person asserts a legal challenge to the validity of an ordinance, “an original
declaratory judgment or injunction action in the circuit court is the proper vehicle.” Seminole
Entm't, Inc. v. City of Casselberry, 866 So. 2d 1242, 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Bd. of Com'rs of
State Institutions v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., 100 So. 2d 67, 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958).
6. Standing to challenge an illegally enacted ordinance does not require allegations or
proof of any special injury. See Renard v. Dade County, 261 So. 2d 832, 838 (Fla. 1972) (“Any
affected resident, citizen or property owner of the governmental unit in question has standing to
challenge such an ordinance.”); Safer v. City of Jacksonville, 212 So. 2d 785, 787 (Fla. 1st DCA
1968); see also David v. City of Dunedin, 473 So. 2d 304, 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding
“property owners or citizens who should have been given notice pursuant to [Fla. Stat. § 166.041]”
had standing to “make a general attack on the validity of the ordinance through an injunction in
circuit court . . . without alleging special damages.”)
7. Consistent with the foregoing authorities, Fla. Stat. § 166.041(7) codifies standing
“to initiate a challenge to the adoption of an ordinance . . . based on a failure to strictly adhere to
3
the provisions contained in this section” for “a person who was entitled to actual or constructive
notice at the time the ordinance . . . was adopted.” Persons entitled to constructive notice of the
proposed adoption of an ordinance, and thus having standing to challenge its adoption for failure
to comply with Fla. Stat. § 166.041, are all persons within the municipality. Fla. Stat.
§ 166.041(3)(a).2
8. In addition to the constructive notice requirements of § 166.041(3)(a), the
amendatory language republication requirements of § 166.041(2) also serve a notice function:
“We have also held that the . . . provision was designed to inform
both the legislature and the public of the nature and extent of
proposed changes in existing laws. For this reason it is required that
when a specific section or subsection is being amended it should
be republished with the proposed amendment so that an
examination of the act itself will reflect the changes
contemplated, as well as their impact on the amended statute.”
See City of Hallandale v. State ex rel. Zachar, 371 So. 2d 186, 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (emphasis
added) (quoting Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Hillsborough County Aviation Auth., 153 So. 2d 722, 725
(Fla. 1963)3).
2 The applicable constructive notice provision requires that all ordinances, except for certain
emergency and zoning ordinances,
be noticed once in a newspaper of general circulation in the
municipality. The notice of proposed enactment shall state the date,
time, and place of the meeting; the title or titles of proposed
ordinances; and the place or places within the municipality where
such proposed ordinances may be inspected by the public. The
notice shall also advise that interested parties may appear at the
meeting and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance.
Fla. Stat. § 166.041(a) (emphasis added).
3 Courts interpreting the language of Fla. Stat. § 166.041(2), governing the legal
requirements for amendatory city ordinances, look to cases interpreting the counterpart language
of the Florida Constitution governing the same requirements for amendatory state statutes, Art. III,
§ 6, Fla. Const. (formerly Art. III, § 16, Fla. Const.). See City of Hallandale, 371 So. 2d at 188
(“Subsection 2, which specifies procedural requirements for the enactment of municipal
ordinances, actually embodies Article III, s 16, of the Florida Constitution as it pertains to state
statutes.”)
4
9. Under the plain language of Fla. Stat. § 166.041(2), amendatory ordinances must,
at a minimum, republish the paragraph of the ordinance section or sub-section being amended. See
City of Hallandale, 371 So. 2d at 188 (“‘“The explicit terms of the . . . provision contemplate that
in a proper case reenactment of a single paragraph of a sub-section is sufficient.”’” (quoting
Jackson v. Consol. Gov't of City of Jacksonville, 225 So. 2d 497, 507 (Fla. 1969)). In addition to
the minimum requirement to republish the paragraph being amended, “enough of the act being
amended must be republished to make the meaning of the provision published intelligible from its
language and to insure that no unexpected meaning results from the combination of that language
and other language in the Act.” Jackson, 225 So. 2d at 508 (internal quotation marks omitted).
10. “Florida follows the majority view whereby measures passed in contravention of
notice requirements are invalid (null and void if not strictly enacted pursuant to the requirement of
section 166.041).” Daytona Leisure Corp. v. City of Daytona Beach, 539 So. 2d 597, 599 (Fla. 5th
DCA 1989) (citing Fountain v. City of Jacksonville, 447 So. 2d 353, 355 n.2 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984));
Coleman v. City of Key West, 807 So. 2d 84, 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“The notices are mandated
in order to protect interested persons, who are thus given the opportunity to learn of proposed
ordinances; given the time to study the proposals for any negative or positive effects they might
have if enacted; and given notice so that they can attend the hearings and speak out to inform the
city commissioners prior to ordinance enactment. Noncompliance with the notice provisions takes
away or reduces these opportunities.”); see also David, 473 So. 2d at 306 (“Accordingly, we hold
that because appellants proved that the ordinance under which they were cited and its predecessor
were invalidly enacted, the trial court erred in refusing to issue the injunction to restrain appellees
from enforcing the ordinances.”
5
APPLICATION OF LAW TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE
11. As shown by the Parsons Affidavit, Plaintiff is a resident of Jacksonville, Florida,
and has been at all times relevant to the adoption of the HRO. Accordingly, Plaintiff was entitled
to notice of the proposed adoption of the HRO pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 166.041(3)(a), and therefore,
pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 166.041(7) and applicable precedent, Plaintiff has standing to challenge the
validity of the HRO based on the failure of the City to adhere to the provisions of Fla. Stat.
§ 166.041. See supra, ¶¶ 5-7.
12. As shown by Complaint ¶¶ 1-22 (including Complaint Exhibits A-C) and the
Gannam Affidavit, neither the publicly noticed nor the enacted versions of the HRO adhered to
the requirements of Fla. Stat. § 166.041, either strictly or otherwise. Accordingly, the HRO is null
and void, and Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction against its enforcement. See supra,
¶¶ 8-10.
13. As shown by Gannam Affidavit Exhibit 1, at the time the Complaint was filed, the
City took the position that the HRO was a validly enacted law. In its Motion to Dismiss filed March
22, 2017, the City maintains this erroneous position. (Mot. Dismiss at 1, n.1.) Accordingly, the
City’s position on the validity of the HRO is adverse to Plaintiff’s, and there is a need for a
declaration of the validity of the HRO.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands a judgment declaring that the HRO is null and void,
permanently enjoining the City from enforcing the HRO, and awarding Plaintiff his costs of this
action pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 86.081 and as otherwise allowed by law, together with such other
and further relief as the Court deems just and proper
Office of General Counsel 117 West Duval Street, Suite 480
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
(904) 630-1700 (Telephone)
(904) 630-1316 (Facsimile)
Attorneys for Defendant,
City of Jacksonville, Florida
/s/ Roger K. Gannam
Roger K. Gannam
Attorney for Plaintiff
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA
JOHN PARSONS,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 16-2017-CA-001263-XXXX-MA DIVISION CV-E
vs.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida,
Defendant. -------- -------
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN PARSONS
IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ST A TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DUVAL
1. My name is John Parsons, and I am over 21 years of age.
2. I am the named Plaintiff in this action, I have personal knowledge of the matters
set forth herein, and am competent to testify to such matters.
3. I currently reside in Jacksonville, Florida, and have resided in Jacksonville for
approximately four years.
4. I am a registered voter in Jacksonville, Florida, in City Council District 5, and have
been for approximately four years.
FURTHER THE AFFIANT SA YETH NAUGHT.
DATED this March ;.B, 2017.
JORN PARSONS
Page 1 of 2
MSJ Exhibit A
ST A TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DUVAL
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, appeared John Parsons, who produced a Florida Driver License, showing an address in Jacksonville, Florida, as identification, and who, after being duly sworn, says that the foregoing Affidavit of John Parsons in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is true and correct.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on thisdS day of March, 2017.
,,,,,.,.,,,,, D. M. DAMEWOOD '''\p.flY P(JIJ ,, /.-iE''~\ Notary Public - State of Florida
'•,f;,'ff,[,\,,•'' Bonded Through National Notary Assn.
Notary Public, STATE OF FLORIDA Printed Name: ------------
Type/Print/Stamp Name of Notary, Commission No. & Expiration Date:
Page 2 of 2
JOHN PARSONS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation and political sub di vision of the State of Florida,
Defendant. I
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUY AL COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. 16-2017-CA-001263-XXXX-MA DIVISION CV-E
AFFIDAVIT OF ROGER K. GANNAM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ST A TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE
1. My name is Roger K. Gannam, and I am over 21 years of age. I submit this
declaration upon personal knowledge, except where indicated.
2. I am an attorney and the Assistant Vice President of Legal Affairs for Liberty
Counsel, and an attorney ofrecord for Plaintiff, John Parsons, in this case.
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an e-mail exchange
(including attachments, highlighting added) between Jason Gabriel, General Counsel for the City
of Jacksonville, and me, dated February 22, 2017, Subject: HRO Veto.
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the original text of
proposed Ordinance 2017-15, Jacksonville Ordinance Code, as published by the Jacksonville City
Council on it's official website, at http://cityclts.coj.net/coj/C0Jbil1Detail.asp?F=2017-
0015\0riginal%20Text (last visited March 21, 2017).
Page 1 of 2 MSJ Exhibit B
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the online version of the
public notice of proposed enactment of Ordinance 2017-15, stating the date, time, and place of the
public hearing on the proposed ordinance; the title of the proposed ordinance; and the place where
the proposed ordinance may be inspected by the public; and advising that interested parties may
appear at the hearing and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinance; as was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City of Jacksonville, the Financial News and Daily Record,
and which is available now on the newspaper's website, at http: //www.jaxdailyrecord.com/
publicnotice.php (last visited March 21 , 2017).
DATED this March 21 , 2017.
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, appeared Roger K. Gannam, who is personally known to me, and who, after being duly sworn, says that the foregoing Affidavit of Roger K. Gannam in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is true and correct.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this ~\ day of March, 2017.
~~ Notary Public, S] TE OE Fa &.-6 Printed Name: \'(!JlJ,s ~a (fQ'c
Type/Print/Stamp Name of Notary, Commission No. & Expiration Date:
Page 2 of2
From: Gabriel, JasonTo: Roger GannamSubject: RE: HRO VetoDate: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:56:46 AM
Roger –
The Charter gives the Mayor a certain timeframe to exercise his right to veto, sign or not signlegislation. The Mayor fulfilled his Charter-prescribed duty the night of the vote by officially lettingthe law go into effect without his signature.
The effective date of the law is the date he signs, or if he chooses not to sign, the date it wasenacted by Council. Accordingly, Ordinance 2017-15-E became law on February 14, 2017 without hissignature. His action is final.
Thank you,
-Jason G.
From: Roger Gannam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:38 AMTo: Gabriel, JasonSubject: HRO Veto
Jason, I trust you are aware of the ongoing debate regarding the mayor’s continuingauthority to veto the HRO. You may have seen the memorandum we released yesterday(copy attached) on the issue.
Although I have seen some statements attributed to you, and others attributed tocouncil members, I have not seen any analysis engaging the argument in ourmemorandum, or even engaging the text of the Charter. Most of what I have seen islittle more than “that’s just not how it works.”
Has your office prepared any official guidance on the issue?
Regards, Roger
Roger K. Gannam, Esq.†Assistant Vice President of Legal AffairsLiberty CounselPO Box 540774Orlando, FL 32854407-875-1776 phone407-875-0770 faxwww.LC.org
This message (and any attached files) is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If youare not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer, because anydistribution of this message by you is strictly prohibited. Email cannot be guaranteed secure or error-free. We do not accept responsibilityfor errors or omissions herein that result from email transmission. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are solely those of theauthor and do not necessarily represent those of Liberty Counsel.
ORDINANCE 201715 An Ordinance Concerning Equal Opportunity And Expanding The City’s Equal Rights Laws To
Prohibit Discrimination Based Upon Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity, AmendingSection 60.105 (Functions, Powers And Duties), Ordinance Code; Amending Section 400.101(Statement Of Policy), Ordinance Code; Amending Chapter 402 (Equal EmploymentOpportunity), Ordinance Code; Amending Chapter 406 (Public Accommodations), OrdinanceCode; Amending Chapter 408 (Fair Housing), Ordinance Code; Providing Legislative Intent;Providing For Exemption For Religious Institutions; Providing For Exemption For SmallEmployers; Providing For SingleSex Facilities And Dress Codes; Providing ForInterpretation; Authorizing The Office Of General Counsel To Make Codification Changes;Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201716
An Ordinance Regarding Equal Opportunity/Equal Access; Amending Section 400.217(Records And Reports), Part 2 (Equal Opportunity/Equal Access Program), Chapter 400(Equal Opportunity/Equal Access), Ordinance Code, To Include Reporting Requirement ToCity Council; Requesting The Mayor Include In The 20172018 Annual Budget For TheConsolidation Of The City Of Jacksonville Funding To Fill The Position Of The AssistantDirector For The Equal Opportunity/Equal Access Program; Requesting IndependentAgencies Diversified Workforce Reporting; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201717
An Ordinance Concerning A Continuation Grant; Appropriating Revenue Carried ForwardFrom Prior Years’ Appropriations, As Required By The U.S. Department Of Agriculture(Grantor), To Enhance The Afterschool Food Program In Fiscal Year 20162017, As InitiatedBy B.T. 17024; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201718
An Ordinance Appropriating $34,000 From The Northwest Jacksonville EconomicDevelopment Fund Miscellaneous Sales To The Northwest Economic Development Fund Subsidies & Contributions To Private Organizations To Provide A Grant To 2385 CorbettStreet, LLC (“Company”) For The Purpose Of Providing Funding In Connection With TheRenovation Of Unused Buildings Located Generally At 2385 Corbett Street, As Initiated ByB.T. 17045; Providing A Carryover Of Funds From Year To Year Until Such Funds AreExpended Or Lapse According To The Agreement; Approving And Authorizing Execution OfDocuments By The Mayor Or His Designee And Corporation Secretary; Authorizing ApprovalOf Technical Amendments By The Executive Director Of The OED; Providing For CityOversight By The OED; Waiving Certain Guidelines Approved And Adopted By Ordinance2007281E; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201719
An Ordinance Authorizing And Approving: (1) An Amendment To The RedevelopmentAgreement Between Jessie L. Wilcox And Rosa L. Wilcox (Collectively, “Developer”) AndThe City Of Jacksonville (“City”) Dated May 19, 2003 (“Redevelopment Agreement”); (2) AMortgage Modification Agreement Between The City And The Developer; And (3) AnAmended And Restated Promissory Note Between The City And Developer, For The PurposeOf ReAmortizing The Remaining Balance Of The Loan And To Extend The Term Of The NoteAnd Mortgage Evidencing The Loan For A Period Of Seven Years, To February 1, 2024, TheOriginal Loan Having Been Authorized By 2003300E; Authorizing Such Other ClosingDocuments And Technical Changes As May Be Required By The General Counsel, Or HisDesignee, And The Mayor’s Office, Provided That The City’s Costs Are Not Increased;Providing For City Oversight By The Office Of Economic Development; Waiver Of ThatPortion Of The Project Evaluation Criteria Of The Northwest Jacksonville EconomicDevelopment Fund Adopted By Ordinance 2007281E Which Would Require The SubmissionOf Annual Audited Financial Statements And A Third Party Underwriting Requirement;Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201720
An Ordinance Authorizing The Compensation And Benefits Division Of The EmployeeServices Department To Offer The Option To Enroll In The UF Health Plan To City EmployeesOr Retirees Covered Under The City’s Group Health Plan On March 31, 2017, Any New CityEmployees First Eligible To Participate In The City’s Employee Benefit Programs On Or AfterApril 1, 2017, And Any Retirees Covered Under Any City Group Health Plan Who Retire OnOr After April 1, 2017; Authorizing The Mayor To Negotiate, Execute And Deliver A ThirdParty Administrative Services Contract With Integra Administrative Group, Inc. (“Integra”) ToAdminister The UF Health Plan; Invoking The Exemption In 126.107(G), Ordinance Code;Waiving Section 116.1406(A) (Procurement Of Plan Administrator), Ordinance Code, To AllowThe City To Enter Into A Third Party Administrative Services Contract With Integra ToAdminister The UF Health Plan; Providing For City Oversight By The Compensation AndBenefits Division Of The Employee Services Department; Requesting One Cycle EmergencyPassage; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201721
An Ordinance Concerning Surplus City Personal Property Originally Purchased By TheFlorida Department Of Health In Duval County With Funding From The U.S. Department OfHealth And Human Services (HRSA) (The “Property”); Incorporating Recitals; Authorizing TheAppropriate Officials Of The City To Transfer The Property To Agape Community HealthCenter, Inc., The New Federal Qualified Health Center (FQHC) At No Cost In Order To AllowThe Continuation Of Intended Health Services; Waiving Conflicting Provisions Of Chapter122 (Public Property), Sections 122.811 (Sales Of Tangible Personal Property; Prohibition OfSales To Certain Persons), 122.812 (Surplus, Obsolete And Waste Supplies And OtherTangible Personal Property), And 122.821 (Disposal Of Surplus Vehicles And FleetEquipment), Ordinance Code, So As To Effect The Transfer Without Public Bidding And AtNo Cost; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201722
An Ordinance Concerning The Fiscal Year 20152016 Jacksonville Aviation Authority (JAA)Budget; Amending Ordinance 2015504E (The City Of Jacksonville Budget Ordinance) ToRevise The Total Number Of Temporary Hours And Revise JAA Budget Schedule G;Attaching And Incorporating Second Revised Schedule G; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201723
An Ordinance Declaring Jarboe Lane, A Private Road Running From Strickland Road ToKings Road In The City Of Neptune Beach, Florida, R.E. Number 1774190000, In CouncilDistrict 13 (The “Subject Parcel”), To Be Surplus To The Needs Of The City; Authorizing ItsConveyance To The City Of Neptune Beach At No Cost And Authorizing The Mayor And TheCorporation Secretary To Execute Any And All Documents Necessary For Such ConveyanceIn Accordance With The Provisions Of Subpart B (Real Property Dispositions), Part 4 (RealProperty), Chapter 122 (Public Property), Ordinance Code; Providing An Effective Date.
ORDINANCE 201724 An Ordinance Approving, And Authorizing The Mayor, Or His Designee, And Corporation
Secretary To Execute And Deliver, The Hurricane Matthew Disaster Declaration FederallyFunded Public Assistance State Agreement Between The State Of Florida And The City OfJacksonville Allowing The City To Be Reimbursed For Eligible Costs And Damages FromHurricane Matthew; Providing For Oversight By The Emergency Preparedness Division OfThe Jacksonville Fire And Rescue Department; Providing An Effective Date. ORDINANCE 201725
An Ordinance Establishing A Temporary Moratorium On The Acceptance, Processing OrApproval Of Any Wireless Communication Towers Or Facilities In The City’s RightsOfWay;Providing An Effective Date.
A copy of the proposed ordinances may be examined in the Office of Legislative ServicesDivision of the City Council, Suite 430, City Hall, on weekdays between the hours of 8:00a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
All persons interested are notified to be present at said time and place, and they may beheard with respect to the proposed ordinances.DATED this 13th day of January, A.D. 2017.Council of the City of Jacksonville
Attest: Cheryl L. Brown
Council Secretary Jan. 13 (170234)
Subscribe to The Daily Record to view all of the information.
Displaying 1 to 1 (of 1 total) records
Search Again
Published for 27,152 consecutive weekdays
Covering events in the Realty and Building communities in Northeast Florida.