Top Banner
IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?
21

IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Aleesha Horn
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS

Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Page 2: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Jeremiah 7:1-14, NRSVReader: The word that came to Jeremiah from the Lord: Stand in the gate of the Lord’s house, and proclaim there this word, and say, Here the word of the Lord, all you people of Judah, you that enter these gates to worship the Lord. Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: Amend your ways and your doings, and let me dwell with you in this place. Do not trust in these deceptive words, “This is the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord.”

All: For if you truly amend your ways and your doings, if you truly act justly with one another, if you do not oppress the alien the orphan, and the widow, or shed innocent blood in this place, and if you do not go after other gods to your own hurt, then I will dwell with you in this place, in the land that I gave of old to your ancestors forever and ever.

>>>>>

Page 3: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Reader: Here you are, trusting in deceptive words to no avail. Will you steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, make offerings to Baal, and go after other gods that you have not known, and then come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, “We are safe!”—only to go on doing all these abominations? Has this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your sight?

ALL: You know, I too am watching, says the Lord. Go now to my place that was in Shiloh, where I made my name dwell at first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel.

Reader: And now, because you have done all these things, says the Lord, and when I spoke to you persistently, you did not listen, and when I called you, you did not answer, therefore I will do to the house that is called by my name, in which you trust, and to the place that I gave to you and to your ancestors just what I did to Shiloh.

ALL: And I will cast you out of my sight, just as I cast out all your kinfolk, all the offspring of Ephraim. The End

Page 4: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS

Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Page 5: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

First Backstory: Hebrew (versus Western) Thought

■Our thinking is Platonic in origin– Static – State of being, ontology– Spatial – Place, location, sphere– Linear logic, in contrast to narrative

■Hebrew thought differs from Greek philosophy– Dynamic – Becoming, Action, Relationships to

others– Temporal – Time, Movement, Adaptation– Moral character and moral development

Page 6: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Sister Lillian Harrington’s MidrashIn the long, long ago, the Lord God searched for people to be his own.

God went to the Greeks and asked, “What can you do for me if I make you my chosen people?” “We are gifted architects. We can build beautiful temples where people can come in great numbers from all over the world to worship you.” “Thank you very much,” God said, and moved on.

Then the Lord God went to the Romans and said, “What can you do for me if I make you my chosen people?” “We are great builders of roads and bridges. We will build bridges and roads so that the people can find their way to you.” “Thank you very much,” God said, and moved on.

Then God went to the Jewish people and asked, “What can you do for me if I make you my chosen people?” An old rabbi answered for them, “We are not gifted architects. Neither are we builders of great roads and bridges. What we can do is tell stories.”

And God said, “Then you will be my people.”

Page 7: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Other Ways to Look at This■ Perelandra by C. S. Lewis and his “fixed land” versus “floating

islands.”

■ Rick Rice’s model of how denominations (and religions?) begin with narratives and actions and end up with dogma or codified actions (the Talmud, Hadiths, Sharia, Fiqh, Canon Law, Creeds, Inquisition, etc.), something static and spatial. When this happens, often a life-changing reformation or new movement occurs.

■ We can trace these developments from Abraham’s call from Mesopotamia (where idols provided stasis for a substitute or double of deity while temples provided their dwelling places) and his household inheritance (fixed place) to becoming a semi-nomad. When Jesus’ came, He used actions and stories to uproot the static preoccupation with rules and walls, and a spatial fixation with Herod’s temple. His crucifixion and subsequent intolerance of his disciples led to a new movement.

■ These ideas provide a basis for understanding the dynamics of Jeremiah.

Page 8: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Second Backstory:Nathan and the Davidic

Covenant■ “And the Lord declares to you that the Lord will make a dynasty for you. When the time comes for you to die and you lie down with your ancestors, I will raise up your descendant—one of your very own children—to succeed you, and I will establish his kingdom. He will build a temple* for my name and I will establish his royal throne forever….Whenever he does wrong, I will discipline him with a human rod, with blows from human beings. But I will never take my faithful love away from him like I took it away from Saul, whom I set aside in favor of you. Your dynasty and your kingdom will be secured forever before me. Your throne will be established forever” (2 Sam. 7:11b-16, CEB). *Literally, “a house.”

■ David to Solomon: “So also the Lord will confirm the word he spoke to me: ‘If your children will take care to walk before me faithfully, with all their heart and all their being, then one of your own children will never fail to be on the throne of Israel’” (1 Kings 2:4, CEB).

Page 9: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

The Backstory of David Continues

■ God to Solomon after building the temple: “I have heard your prayer and your cry to me. I have set apart this temple* that you have built, to put my name there forever. My eyes and my heart will always be there. As for you, if you walk before me just as your father David did, with complete dedication and honesty, and if you do all that I have commanded, and keep my regulations and case laws, then I will establish your royal throne over Israel forever, just as I promised your father David, ‘You will never fail to have a successor on the throne of Israel.’ However, if you or your sons turn away from following me and don’t observe the commands and regulations that I gave you, and go to serve other gods, and worship them, then I will remove Israel from the land I gave them and I will reject the temple that I dedicated for my name. Israel will become a joke, insulted by everyone. Everyone who passes by this temple, so lofty now, will be shocked and will whistle, wondering. Why has the Lord done such a thing to this land and this temple? The answer will come: Because they deserted the Lord their God (1 Kings 9:3-9, CEB). *Literally, “house.”

Page 10: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Jeremiah in Conflict with the Powers■ Jeremiah had to contend with a very hierarchical system of King, princes,

priests (including close kinsmen apparently), and the officials. They represented the “status quo,” the traditional structures that most understood to have held Jerusalem and Judah together and provided it with strength.

■ Jeremiah also stood against a number of prophets, all of whom prophesied peace, with the promise of removal of Nebuchadnezzar’s claims on Jerusalem and Judah. The promises of peace seem to rest on both the covenant God made with David and the fact that Yahweh had Solomon’s temple in which to dwell. For Jeremiah to counter these promises and the temple with predictions of disaster seemed tantamount to rejection of the covenant and the temple.

■ Like many of the classical prophets, Jeremiah stood in conflict with the powers. In doing so, he and the other prophets demonstrated the continual theme that runs through the entire Bible of God against hierarchy. Attempts to control the people from above could be understood as usurping God’s prerogative.

Page 11: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Elements in the Conflict■ Idolatry – the establishment of a fixed, static image to act as a double of the god, thus

creating something stationery and immobile (of itself) and claim that it can act dynamically because the worshippers have manipulated and controlled it. What makes it “work” is magic, a magic that we invoke and create.

■ Baal worship – A deity whose name is a title meaning, “lord, master, owner.” In Exod. 21:22-25, it serves as the “husband” of a wife. Since Israel was to be Yahweh’s wife, the title could be applied to Yahweh as another Baal (1 Chron. 12:5/6). In Hosea 2:16/18, the prophet declared that in the future time, Israel would no longer refer to Yahweh as my baal, but my ish (husband as an equal). In the Baal Cycles, this deity typifies kingship and lust for power, a power that proves to be very tentative. Hosea posits Yahweh worship has having to do with relationship and character, not power, something that Jeremiah echoes in the new covenant (Jer. 31:31-34).

■ Abuse – Idolatry invariably leads to abuse of others. Neglect of the poor, shedding innocent blood, child sacrifices, robbery and cheating in business contracts entailed some of the sins Jeremiah confronted.

■ Taking refuge in the promises – Yahweh’s prophet had promised that a descendant of David would always sit on the throne and that His name (character) would ever remain in the temple. The king, princes, priests, and people believed these promises, selectively forgetting their conditions and the biblical principle that “the promises and threatenings of God are alike conditional” (1 SM 67). This forgetfulness led the king to refuse Jeremiah’s instructions to submit to Nebuchadnezzar as his vassal and the people to chant, “Yahweh’s temple,” repeatedly (Jer. 7:4).

Page 12: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Parallels in Today’s Conflict■ Idolatry – Contriving our own reality and calling it something different

than what it is in order to manipulate and control others. Fixing in static form beliefs and practices to which loyalty oaths must be given as though those beliefs and practices were infallible and thus equal to God. “God and heaven alone are infallible” (1SM 37).

■ Worship of Power – Bending the knee to a few people who wield power over many, thus giving into the “kingly power” that Ellen White insisted must be banished from the church in 1901.

■ Abuse – This is inevitably the result of resorting to static forms and spatial boxes into which we put “light” and then close the lid to “protect” it only to leave it in darkness. We then seek to force people to stay within the protected “light” on penalty of losing our endorsement and possibly their ability to spread the real light to others.

■ Refuge in the promises – We have fewer promises than Israel had that we could never let God down. But, of course, our promises are unconditional.

Page 13: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Idolatry■ We have many lessons to learn, and many, many to unlearn. God and

heaven alone are infallible. Those who think that they will never have to give up a cherished view, never have occasion to change an opinion, will be disappointed. As long as we hold to our own ideas and opinions with determined persistency, we cannot have the unity for which Christ prayed.—The Review and Herald, July 26, 1892. {1SM 37.3}

■ In regard to infallibility, I never claimed it; God alone is infallible. His word is true, and in Him is no variableness, or shadow of turning.—Letter 10, 1895. {1SM 37.4}

■ The Roman Church reserves to the clergy the right to interpret the Scriptures. On the ground that ecclesiastics alone are competent to explain God’s word, it is withheld from the common people. Though the Reformation gave the Scriptures to all, yet the selfsame principle which was maintained by Rome prevents multitudes in Protestant churches from searching the Bible for themselves. They are taught to accept its teachings as interpreted by the church; and there are thousands who dare receive nothing, however plainly revealed in Scripture, that is contrary to their creed or the established teaching of their church. {GC 596.3}

Page 14: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Toward Static Beliefs■ “Let us suppose a case: We get up a creed, stating just what we shall believe on this point

and the other, and just what we shall do in reference to this thing and that, and say that we will believe the gifts too. But suppose the Lord, through the gifts, should give us some new light that did not harmonize with our creed; then, if we remain true to the gifts, it knocks our creed all over at once. Making a creed is setting the stakes, and barring up the way to all future advancement. God put the gifts into the church for a good and great object; but men who have got up their churches, have shut up the way or have marked out a course for the Almighty. They say virtually that the Lord must not do anything further than what has been marked out in the creed. A creed and the gifts thus stand in direct opposition to each other. Now what is our position as a people? The Bible is our creed. We reject everything in the form of a human creed. We take the Bible and the gifts of the Spirit; embracing the faith that thus the Lord will teach us from time to time. And in this we take a position against the formation of a creed. We are not taking one step, in what we are doing, toward becoming Babylon.” –James White, 1861

■ When God’s Word is studied, comprehended, and obeyed, a bright light will be reflected to the world; new truths, received and acted upon, will bind us in strong bonds to Jesus. The Bible, and the Bible alone, is to be our creed, the sole bond of union; all who bow to this Holy Word will be in harmony. Our own views and ideas must not control our efforts. Man is fallible, but God’s Word is infallible. Instead of wrangling with one another, let men exalt the Lord. Let us meet all opposition as did our Master, saying, “It is written.” Let us lift up the banner on which is inscribed, The Bible our rule of faith and discipline.—The Review and Herald, December 15, 1885. {1SM 416.2}

Page 15: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Worship of Power (Baal)

■ God has not set any kingly power in the Seventh-day Adventist Church to control the whole body, or to control any branch of the work. He has not provided that the burden of leadership shall rest upon a few men. Responsibilities are distributed among a large number of competent men.—Testimonies for the Church 8:236. 

■ “The division of the General Conference into District Union Conferences was God’s arrangement. In the work of the Lord for these last days there should be no Jerusalem centers, no kingly power. And the work in the different countries is not to be bound by contracts to the work centering in Battle Creek, for this is not God’s plan. Brethren are to counsel together, for we are just as much under the control of God in one part of His vineyard as in another. Brethren are to be one in heart and soul, even as Christ and the Father are one. Teach this, practice this, that we may be one with Christ in God, all working to build up one another. {8T 232.6}

Page 16: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Abuse“Finite men should beware of seeking to control their fellow men, taking the place assigned to the Holy Spirit. Let not men feel that it is their prerogative to give to the world what they suppose to be truth, and refuse that anything should be given contrary to their ideas. This is not their work. Many things will appear distinctly as truth, which will not be acceptable to those who think their own interpretations of the Scripture always right. Most decided changes will have to be made in regard to ideas which some have accepted as without a flaw. These men give evidence of fallibility in very many ways; they work upon principles which the word of God condemns. That which makes me feel to the very depths of my being, and makes me know that their works are not the works of God, is that they suppose they have authority to rule their fellow men. The Lord has given them no more right to rule others than He has given others to rule them. Those who assume the control of their fellow men, take into their finite hands a work that devolves on God alone” (TM 76; context: Minneapolis).

Page 17: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

The Promise■ Context: “And all who will not bow to the decree of the national councils and obey the

national laws to exalt the Sabbath instituted by the man of sin, to the disregard of God’s holy day, will feel, not the oppressive power of popery alone, but of the Protestant world, the image of the beast” (2 SM 380).

■ “Satan will work his miracles to deceive; he will set up his power as supreme. The church may appear as about to fall, but it does not fall. It remains, while the sinners in Zion will be sifted out—the chaff separated from the precious wheat. This is a terrible ordeal, but nevertheless it must take place. None but those who have been overcoming by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony will be found with the loyal and true, without spot or stain of sin, without guile in their mouths. We must be divested of our self-righteousness and arrayed in the righteousness of Christ” (2 SM 380).

■ “I was confirmed in all I had stated in Minneapolis that a reformation must go through the churches. Reforms must be made, for spiritual weakness and blindness were upon the people who had been blessed with great light and precious opportunities and privileges. As reformers they had come out of the denominational churches, but they now act a part similar to that which the churches acted. We hoped that there would not be the necessity for another coming out. While we will endeavor to keep the “unity of the Spirit” in the bonds of peace, we will not with pen or voice cease to protest against bigotry” {Ms. 30, 1889 (June 21, 1889)}.

Page 18: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Questions for Discussion■ 1. What are the current idols of Seventh-day Adventists?

■ 2. Is the promise we have that the church does not fall similar to the promises that David would always have a descendant sitting on his throne?

■ 3. Is the promise that the church does not fall conditional or absolute and unchanging?

■ 4. For years, Adventist members in North America have used the Adventist Church as a club to belong to and pay monthly dues. We think we own it, we think it should serve us, we think of it as static (our property) instead of dynamic. But is this our church? And who should serve whom? And what about service, justice, and mission?

■ Does a member, department, institution have the right to control another member, department, or institution in the church?

Page 19: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Laodicea■ “Now write to the messenger of the church in Laodicea : The words of the

Amen, the trustworthy and true witness, the source of God’s creation:”

■ “I know your works: that you (2ms) are neither cold nor hot. Oh that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are tepid, and neither hot nor cold, I am just about to vomit you out of my mouth. For you say, ‘I am rich, I have made profit, and I need nothing at all.’ You do not know that you are miserable, deserving of pity, poor, blind, and naked. I counsel you to buy from me gold that has been refined by fire so that you may be rich; and white garments to wear so that the disgrace of your nakedness might not be exposed; and salve to anoint your eyes so that you may see. Those who I love, I rebuke and discipline. Be eager, therefore, and repent.

■ “Look! I have been standing at the door, and I am knocking. If anyone should hear my voice and open the door, I will come into him/her and eat with him/her and he/she with me.

■ “To the one who is victorious I will give the ability to sit with me on my throne, just as I myself been victorious and sat down with my Father on his throne.

■ “Let anyone who has an ear listen to what the Spirit is saying to the churches.”

Page 20: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

Notes on Laodicea■ Note the transition between the representative “you” that ultimately refers to

the church (as is the case with every one of the messages to the seven churches) and the “anyone” (tis). This is a pattern that runs through all seven messages to the churches.

■ A “throne” (thronos) or “seat” (kisse) was anciently reserved for people in power (kings, priests, judges). The people stood. Yet is this really about power here?

■ Note the “threatenings” in the seven messages:– Ephesus – Removal of its lampstand from its place

– Smyrna – None (persecuted church)

– Pergamum – Jesus will make war with those who hold to false teachings

– Thyatira – Throw adulterers with Jezebel into distress; will give according to their works

– Sardis – Jesus will come like a thief and they won’t know the hour he comes.

– Philadelphia – None (it has a little power)

– Laodicea – Jesus will vomit it out of his mouth.

Only the first and the last are threatened with wholesale removal or expulsion.

Page 21: IN CONFLICT WITH THE POWERS Eternal Status or Conditional Promise?

To Lighten the Moment…