Top Banner
Improving handover in the ED setting “SBAR“
18

Improving handover in the ED setting “SBAR“

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Robert Mendoza

Improving handover in the ED setting “SBAR“. Objectives of the “ SBAR Squad from A&E ”. Where we are Where we need to be What do our staff think How far have we got Where are we going. TAPS questions (Additional). “ The SBAR Squad from A&E ” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Improving handover in the ED setting

“SBAR“

Page 2: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Objectives of the “SBAR Squad from A&E”

• Where we are• Where we need to be• What do our staff think• How far have we got• Where are we going

Page 3: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

TAPS questions (Additional)

• “The SBAR Squad from A&E”• What we were trying to achieve and

why it was important:

• What worked well:

• What we have learned to take this forward:

Page 4: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Where we are?

Page 5: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Our Objective:

To deliver high quality, evidence-based, effective, efficient and

patient-centred care for ALL patients in the Emergency Department.

PHASE 1INITIAL ASSESSMENT

• Assessment - initial (complaint, physiology and allocate prioritisation)

• Planning -(investigations needed/ordered, obvious decision to admit - DTA, start now if appropriate)

• Treatment - (immediate treatment/resuscitation required)

PHASE 2 DETAILED ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT

• Detailed assessment• Chase results

of investigations ordered• Instigate further

investigations if required EARLY

• Start treatment plan• Management plan

defined and delivered (with diagnosis, treatment plan and discharge plan)

PHASE 3 MANAGEMENT & DISCHARGE PLANNING

PHASE 4 ED EXIT – PLANNING &

DELIVERY –SBAR

Start Processes To:A) Discharge Home from

ED using SBARB) Admit to In-hospital

Specialty Bed Base SBARC) Admit to ED Observation

Ward/CDU SBAR

If delay in discharge from ED for any reason, inform appropriate person.

TARGET TIMES TO SEE A DOCTOR DAILY & WEEKLY PERFORMANCE RESULTS

FOR EACH PHASE

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EVALUATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

0-15min window 15mins-90mins Window

90mins-3hrs Window

3-4hr window

• ED Senior Nurse SBAR• ED SpR or Cons SBAR• Duty Bed Manager• If there is a breach

(>4hrs in the Dept) in your area, please identify ways to prevent it in the future)

Category 1 (Resuscitation) = ImmediateCategory 2 (Emergency) = Within 10minsCategory 3 (Urgent) = Within 1hrCategory 4 (Non-urgent) = Within 1hr

Patient arrival to discharge MUST BE WITHIN 4 HRS for all patients.

If delay in discharge from ED for any reason, inform appropriate person.

Our Target:

Page 6: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What are the causes of error Fletcher NPSA 2008

Page 7: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Juliette Cosgrove: Q. “are we reporting enough?”

Page 8: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

UCD IR1s 2011 [chart]

Page 9: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Knowledge application

Process & system design

Measuringsuccess

Teamworking & LEADERSHIP

Training

Where we need to be

Page 10: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What do our staff think?“a methodical order:name, age, gender, condition, plan, any risk to staff or patient” - nurse, grade 5.

“simple clear patient details - complaint \ problem \ plan \ what needed \ & additional info.” – CSW.

“everyone needs to handover following the same structure in the trust.” – Sister grade 6.

“any further documentation needs to be short & concise. Already stress on 'time factors' with many other requirements for patients in ED; throughout [ED] stay and d/c to ward.” – Sister grade 7.“S: PC B: Meds & PMH A: impression / exam R: plan “ - SpR in ED.

Page 11: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

What do our staff think?Q1. The Emergency Department is a busy environment where the safety systems in place are robust and require no change.

Please indicate the level of risk you perceive to be associated with the following patient events :Q12. Discussion with other speciality nursing or medical colleagues In the hospital.

1 Strongly Disagree

2 3 4 5Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly

Agree

1 2 3 4 5

Low Risk   Moderate   High Risk

    Risk  

Page 12: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

How far have we got?

• Audit ( ED Cons Shift Team Leader snapshots x2)

• SBAR templates for key areas of the ED• Developing context specific SBAR

Page 13: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Audit of practice

• Applied a development SBAR tool ( sticker in the ED notes)

• 10% and 15% adherence – not good!

• Positives:– Allowed refinement of tool– Embedded SBAR in minds of staff– Led to discussion and outcome to embed in

ED notes

Page 14: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

EMERGENCY DEPT PLANNING &

HANDOVER

Situation•Likely diagnosis &other possible Dx?

Background•Co-morbidities?

Assessment•Present physiology (MEWS, GCS)?•Active problems•Investigations completed & those still required?

Recommendations•Acute therapy given?•Further therapy required and when?•Handover to (their name, grade, specialty) : •Your name, grade & time of referral?

SBAR template embedded into ED Notes

Page 15: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Senior Handover SBAR

Page 16: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

SBAR for CDU protocols

Page 17: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

SSITUATION

NameAgeConsultantDiagnosisTreatment / InterventionsResuscitation Status

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BBACKGROUND

Relevant medical history / surgical historyMedical / AHP consultationsPrevious tests / treatmentsPsychosocial issuesAllergies

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AASSESSMENT

Physical assessmentMental health assessment / cognitionVital signs / O2 requirementsLines - IV, CVC, PICC, ArterialPain score / analgesiaWounds / pressure ulcersDrains or tubesMobility Nutritional statusRisk assessments (MEWS, MUST, VIP scores, MRSA/ decolonisation status and falls assessment.) Pathology resultsPatient /carer education

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RRECOMMENDATION

Care plan /care pathwayOrders needing completionPending treatments or testsDischarge planning

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RREADBACK

Oncoming staff (listener) confirms understanding of recommendations

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 18: Improving handover in the ED setting  “SBAR“

Where are we going!

• Embedding SBAR into ED notes• Developing context specific SBAR within

umbrella of improved handover• Development of better communications

with rest of hospital around SBAR• Developing a tool for adherence and

quality of content of SBAR in context specific situations