Implementation of WFD in Hungary - river Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy of Sciences Research Group for Water Management
Jan 04, 2016
Implementation of WFD in Hungary - rivers
Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy of SciencesResearch Group for Water Management
Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy of SciencesResearch Group for Water Management
Content:
1. Typology system in Hungary
2. Identification of River Water Bodies
3. Identification of Hyromorphological risks
1. Typology for rivers in Hungary
1. Typology for rivers in Hungary
Structure of the typology
Geology (hydrogeochemistry)
Topography (slope of groundsurface)
Geology (Substratum of the river bed)
Size of the catchment area
Chemical composition
Sediments and river morphology
System B is accepted
Topography (landscape, elevation, slope)
Geology - hydrogeochemistry
sub-ecoregions
Geology - substratum
aquatic landscapes
Size of the catchment
B - typology
Structure of the typology
Topography
Releváns morfológiai jellemzők
Topography
> 800 m
200 – 800 m
< 200 m
Topography (sub-ecoregion)
Releváns morfológiai jellemzők
Plains
Mountains
Hills
Geochemical characteristics
Calcerous:karstic rocks loesscalcerous soils
Organic: peat
Silicious: acidic rocks acidic soils
BUT: Ionic composition of water:Everywhere calcerous type in the hilly and flat regions
Mederanyag jellegedurvaközepesfinom
Viz.shp
Substratum of the river bed
coarse
medium
fine
Aquatic landscapes
Sediments and river morphology20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Kilometers
A vízfolyások B-típusú tipológiáját meghatározó részterületek Aquatic landscapes, determining the B-typology of rivers in Hungary
Budapesti Mûszaki és Közgazdaságtudományi EgyetemViziközmû és Környezetmérnöki Tanszék
A mederanyagot meghatározó fed?réteg szemösszetételegainsize classes of the covering layers, determining river substratum:durva/coarseközepes/mediumfinom/fine
Al-ökorégiók/sub-ecoregions:meszes hegyvidék/calcerous mountainsszilikátos hegyvidék/siliceous mountainsmeszes dombvidék/calcerous hilly regionsmeszes síkvidék/calcerous plainstõzeges (szerves) területek/peaty (organic) regions
A mederanyagot meghatározó fedõréteg szemösszetételegainsize classes of the covering layers, determining river substratum:
Sub-ecoregions, geology Size of the catch.
Organic (peaty) regions small medium
coarse small, mountainous regions, calcerous
mountainous regions, silicious coarse small, medium,
hilly regions, calcerous coarse small medium large very large
medium - fine small, medium, large
plains, calcerous coarsesmall medium large, very large,
medium - fine small, small slopemedium, small slope medium, large, very large,
River types River types
Location of types
2. Identification of river Water Bodies
2. Identification of river Water Bodies
Natural River Water Bodies
Merging neighbouring, short river sections following the typology classification
Merging related river sections having <100km2 catchment area
Division of water bodies by important mouths (or country border): Danube, Tisza, Körös
River sections having <10km2 catchment area are not water bodies except if it is recharged by a spring, or it has local importance.
Result: 875 natural River Water Bodies
Artificial River Water Bodies
Definition: "Artificial water body means a body of surface water created by human activity”. (creating a new water body from previously dry land, e.g. a canal)
Selection of canals by considering their ecological importance (discrete expert judgements)
Result: 151 Artificial Water Bodies
Artificial River Water Bodies
Artificial water courses
Artificial Water Bodies
3. Identification of Hydromorphological Risk
3. Identification of Hydromorphological Risk
METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF RISK RELATED TO HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS
Rapid ecological survey in selected river sections (65)
(different types and different alteration)
Criteria for significant alterations obvious: not good status uncertain: possibly not good status
Ecological status based on biological data
Database of human pressures
Designation of significantly altered river sections
(two main groups according to criteria)
Water bodies at risk: > 50 % is altered considering only obvious effects
Estimation of the modified hydromorphological
parameters
Water bodies possibly at risk: > 50 % is altered considering all significant alterations Water bodies not at risk: if non of the above criteria applies to the water body
DETAILED CRITERIA FOR RESERVOIRS IN MOUNTAINS AND HILLS
Reservoir itself:
Changes in cathegory obvious impactobvious impact
Downstream impact, if• no bypass, • MLF is below the type-specific value,• frequency of drying is doubled,
obvious impactobvious impact
Upstream impact if no continuty: (Slope < 1:25, water cover > 10 cm, v< 0,6 m/s)
impact isimpact is uncertainuncertain, because it depends on species (migration?)
Impacted river section: where the downstream catchment is biger than 50 times the surface of reservoir (excluding catchment of other reservoirs!)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF HYDROMORPH. RISK IN RIVERSHUMAN ACTIVITY AND ALTERATION HMR HMR?
Dams and reservoirs
river section influenced by storage in mount.& hilly areas
downstream section of dam in mount.&hilly areas, no continuity, diminished MLF
river section influenced by storage in lowland, level >1m above groundsurface
downstream section of dam in lowland, no continuity, diminished MLF
upstream section of dam, no continuity (sensitive species??)
Impoundment
impounded section in mount.& hilly areas, bank-full stage
impounded section in hilly areas, lower stage
lowland, large rivers, impounded section
other lowland rivers, impounded section
downstream section of weir, if water regime significantly impacted
upstream section of weir, no continuity (sensitive species??)
Dikes and dumps
ratio of width of floodplain and lowflow river bed < 5 in hills, < 10 in lowland
not appropriate land use in floodplain
significant artificial inflow
HUMAN ACTIVITY AND ALTERATION HMR HMR?
River regulation
ratio of width of high and lowflow river bed < 5 in hills or < 10 in lowland
alignment of highflow river bed is not appropriate
not appropriate flow conditions and river bed status
not appropriate substratum
not appropriate riperian zonation
riperian zonation is partly missing
Dredging
overdredging of river bed
dredging of unnecessary frequency or length
Bank protection (pavement)
pavement > 20 % of highflow river bed, or > 40 % of lowflow river bed
pavement between 20 - 40 % of lowflow river bed
Water abstraction and deviation
frequent water scarcity in summer due to abstraction
significant deviation for hydropower generation
other deviation
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF HYDROMORPH. RISK IN RIVERS
Total (50%)Obvious criteria: 15 ( 7.5)Uncertain criteria: 12 ( 6.0)
27 (13.5)
AN EXAMPLE FOR DEFINING HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL RISK
For Water Body No 1Obvious impacts: 10Uncertain impact: 4
14
For Water Body No 2Obvious impacts: 5Uncertain impact: 10
15
For Water Body No 3Obvious impacts: 5Uncertain impact: 7
12
WB is at risk
WB is possibly at risk
WB is not at risk
VÍZTEST SZINTŰ OSZTÁLYOZÁS
hidromorfológiai kockázatNPY
CLASSIFICATION OF WATER BODIES ACCODING TO HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL RISK
Hydromorphological risk
GROUP OF RIVER WATER BODIES FROM HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL POINT OF VIEW
All river water bodies: 875 db, 18 488 km
236 db (23%) , 4594 km (25%)
Good hydromorphological conditions already
297 db (34%), 6425 km (35%)
347 db (40%), 7796 km (42%)
Hydromorphological risk(no good status without measures)
Possibly at risk (hydromorphological impact is uncertain)
231 db (26%) , 4257 km (23%)
METHODOLOGY FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENT OF HYDROMORPHOLOGICAL RISK
Criteria for significant alterations obvious: no good status (checking)
uncertain: possibly no good status (clarification)
Survey of ecological status (ECOSURV, 400 sites)
Evaluation of the results(cluster analysis and filters according to
hydromorphological impacts
Database of human pressures
Estimation of the modified hydromorphological parameters
Still uncertain
Repeating designation procedure Checking water bodies at risk Focusing on water bodies possibly at risk - either in good status - or at risk
Thank you for your attention!