Top Banner
Tectonic Situation 9.0 ML Earthquake Magnitude Depth Km Q Magnitude Depth Peak Ground Acceleration Value Q Tsunami Flood Zone Water Depth (m) 1 - 3 4 - 5 6 - 8 The Tsunami 8m Tsunami Population Affected 0 - 1000 1001 - 10000 10001 - 25000 25001 - 50000 50001 - 100000 Prefecture % Land area affected Population of prefecture Tsunami affected population Total 2,279,608 1,139,804 Methodology Aim Results and Discussion ± References
1

Impact of the 9.0 M Earthquake and Tsunami on the Population of Sendai, Japan

Aug 15, 2015

Download

Environment

Alan Hibbert
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Impact of the 9.0 M Earthquake and Tsunami on the Population of Sendai, Japan

141°0'0"E

141°0'0"E

38°0'0"N

38°0'0"N

Effect of the 9.0M Ea rthqua ke a nd Tsuna mi on the popula tionof S enda i, J a pa n

Service L a yer Credits: Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, a nd other contributorsS ource: Esri, Digita lGlobe, GeoEye, Ea rthsta r Geogra phics, CNES /Airbus DS , US DA,US GS , AEX , Getma pping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, a nd the GIS User CommunityS ources: Esri, DeL orme, US GS , NPSS ources: Esri, US GS , NOAAEsri, HER E, DeL orme, Ma pmyIndia , © OpenS treetMa p contributors, a nd the GIS user

Tectonic Situation

9.0 ML Earthquake

155°E

155°E

150°E

150°E

145°E

145°E

140°E

140°E

135°E

135°E

130°E

130°E

45°N

45°N

40°N

40°N

35°N

35°N

30°N

30°N

Magnitude6 - 6.56.51 - 77.1 - 7.57.51 - 88.1 - 9

Depth Km0 - 2425 - 4950 - 149150 - 588Tectonic pla te bounda ries

Q

143°E

143°E

142°E

142°E

141°E

141°E

140°E

140°E

139°E

139°E

138°E

138°E

40°N

39°N

38°N

37°N

Magnitude6 - 6.56.51 - 77.1 - 7.57.51 - 8

8.1 - 9

Depth0 - 2425 - 2930 - 3940 - 166

Peak Ground AccelerationValue

High

Low

Q9.0M Ea rthqua ke

Tsunami Flood ZoneWater Depth (m)

1 - 34 - 56 - 8

The Tsunami

0 100 200 300 40050Miles

0 6 12 18 243 Miles

0 25 50 75 10012.5Miles

0 6 12 18 243Miles

8m Tsunami Population Affected

0 - 10001001 - 1000010001 - 2500025001 - 5000050001 - 100000

Prefecture % Land area affected Population of prefecture Tsunami affected populationS enda i-shi, T a iha ku-ku 99.06 224,558 222,439R ifu-cho 98.56 36,029 35,512Ona ga wa -cho 90.56 7,512 6,802S oma -shi 86.70 36,195 31,381Ishinoma ki-shi 86.36 150,966 130,370Ma tsushima -ma chi 84.74 15,062 12,765S hinchi-ma chi 82.87 7,957 6,594Na tori-shi 75.05 74,740 56,089Y a ma moto-cho 69.49 13,234 9,195S enda i-shi, Miya gino-ku 64.14 187,306 120,136S hichiga ha ma -ma chi 60.61 19,728 11,963Wa ta ri-cho 60.46 33,942 20,524T a ga jo-shi 54.82 62,203 34,108S enda i-shi, Wa ka ba ya shi-ku 54.12 130,107 70,406Iwa numa -shi 53.63 43,788 23,485Higa shima tsushima -shi 53.11 40,221 21,359S hioga ma -shi 52.95 56,256 29,785S hioga ma -shi 47.05 56,256 26,471Higa shima tsushima -shi 46.90 40,221 18,862Iwa numa -shi 46.37 43,788 20,303S enda i-shi, Wa ka ba ya shi-ku 45.88 130,107 59,701T a ga jo-shi 45.18 62,203 28,095Wa ta ri-cho 39.54 33,942 13,418S hichiga ha ma -ma chi 39.39 19,728 7,765S enda i-shi, Miya gino-ku 35.86 187,306 67,170Y a ma moto-cho 30.52 13,234 4,039Na tori-shi 24.95 74,740 18,651S hinchi-ma chi 17.13 7,957 1,363Ma tsushima -ma chi 15.24 15,062 2,297Ishinoma ki-shi 13.64 150,966 20,596S oma -shi 13.30 36,195 4,814Ona ga wa -cho 9.45 7,512 710R ifu-cho 1.44 36,029 517S enda i-shi, T a iha ku-ku 0.94 224,558 2,119Total 2,279,608 1,139,804

Methodology

Aim

Results and Discussion

T his poster collects a nd presents va rious sources of da ta a va ila ble to estima te numbers of those directly a ffected by the 9.0M tsuna mi, a s well a s provide some historica l context for the event which occurred a t 14:46:18 J S T on 11th of Ma rch, 2011. By combining sepa ra tely a va ila ble sources of da ta to produce new a dditiona l da ta sets, with scope to estima te the number of the popula tion directly a ffected by the tsuna mi flood wa ters. T his will be a chieved by modelling a n 8 m tsuna mi inunda tion on the S enda i coa sta l region a nd combining this with census da ta by prefecture.

J a pa n la ys on the western edge of the pla te bounda ry between the Pa cific a nd North America n pla tes. At this a ctive pla te ma rgin, the Pa cific pla te is being subducted a t a ra te of a pproxima tely 83mm/yr (S eno et a l., 1996), forming a deep region benea th the sea known a s the J a pa n Trench. Over the pa st 100 yea rs, the inter-pla te bounda ry to the north-ea st of J a pa n ha s hosted ma ny sma ller ea rthqua kes up 7.8M, with the region ha ving hosted 9 events grea ter tha n 7 in ma gnitude since 1973 (Ha shimoto et a l., 2009). T he la st time a n ea rthqua ke with compa ra ble ma gnitude a nd loca tion occurred wa s the J oga n Ea rthqua ke, 13th J uly, 869. T his tsuna mi left sediment deposits kilometres in sca le on the S enda i pla in (Minoura et a l., 2001) with a n estima ted ma gnitude of 8.2 (Fujii et a l., 2011) which ca used a round 1000 dea ths a ccording to historica l documents. T he 2011 Ea rthqua ke, is a rela tively ra re disa ster which occurred in a n a ctive pla te bounda ry, fa r surpa ssing other ea rthqua kes from the J a pa n Trench.

In a tota l of 44 prefectures with a tota l popula tion of 1,778,052, 628,890 (35.4 %) were directly a ffected by the tsuna mi.T he prefectures most a ffected by the inunda tion were S enda i T a iha ku-ku, Ishinoma ki-shi, S enda i Miya gino-ku a nd S enda i Wa ka ba ya shi-ku. With Popula tions a ll over 130,000 a nd over 54 % tsuna mi a ffected la nd. Collectively, S enda i a nd its districts (ku) ha s a popula tion of 317,413, with a tota l 137,576 directly a ffected, a pproxima tely 43.3 % (Miya gino - 35.9 %, Wa ka ba ya shi - 54.1 %). T hese prefectures ha ve a high popula tion density, which despite only a round 40 % of the la nd wa s a ffected, tens of thousa nds of people were displa ced a s a result. In contra st Ona ga wa , which despite ha ving 90.8 % of the la nd covered by the tsuna mi, 710 people were a ffected due to the low popula tion of people in this rura l region. Other significa nt prefectures impa cted a re a s follows with most %Popula tion a ffected first: S oma - 36,195 (87 %), Wa ta ri - 33,942 (60.4 %), Iwa numa - 43,788 (53.6 %), S hioga ma - 56,256, (52.9 %), Na tori - 18,051 (24.2 %), Ishinoma ki - 20,596 (13.6 %) a nd Ona gowa - 710 (9.5 %). Other prefectures ca n be referenced from the ta ble.When compa red to results produced by Center for S a tellite Ba sed Crisis Informa tion (DL R ), T he results a re compa ra ble. DL R 's study concluded 12% of the the 1,000,200 were a ffected, where a s my results conclude 35.4% of 1,778,052 were rea ched by flood wa ters. DL R published their results on the 18th of ma rch, 2011, using la ndsa t da ta a cquired from the 12th of ma rch. T his difference in a pproa ch could a ccount for the differing results. For exa mple, ma nma de structures not seen in the DEM ha ve a n effect, which ma y sheltered some a rea s of S enda i from inunda tion, thus lessening the numbers of those a ffected. Da ta relea sed by T he Na tiona l Police Agency sta te, there were 15,840 dea ths, with 3,607 missing. 92.5% of these dea ths a re a ttributed to the tsuna mi flood wa ters (http://www.npa .go.jp/a rchive/keibi/biki/higa ijokyo_ e.pdf) a fa ta lity ra te of 1.09% for the a ffected popula tion of 1,778,052.T he limita tions for the method used in this study a re a s a result of the a ssumptions ma de. As the da ta freely a va ila ble wa s popula tion per prefecture, this mea nt a ssumptions ha d to be ma de tha t the popula tion of ea ch prefecture wa s evenly distributed over the la nd. In rea lity popula tions a re not evenly distributed a nd a re focused on cities, towns a nd villa ges, which wa s not a ble to be included in this study. T he method could be improved if popula tion density da ta wa s loca ted.An a dditiona l limit of this method is the 8 m tsuna mi flood model. T his va lue wa s chosen a s the a vera ge from (Tsuji et a l., 2010) pa per. Of course in rea lity the wa ve height a t the coa st will va ry depending on conditions such a s shore depth a nd slope a ngle.Using the results of this study it ma y be possible to fla g popula tions for coa sta l defence development, pa rticula rly those of the S enda i districts which were ba dly da ma ged. S cope for future study would include, cost per unit coa sta l defence wa ll, or possible sea bed exca va tion to reduce slope a ngle.

±

Abe T, Goto K, S uga wa ra D (2012) R ela tionship between the ma ximum extent of tsuna mi sa nd a nd the inunda tion limit of the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsuna mi on the S enda i Pla in, J a pa n. S ediment

Geol 282:142–150Fujii, Y., K. S a ta ke, S . S a ka i, M. S hinoha ra , a nd T. Ka na za wa (2011), T suna mi source of the 2011 off the Pa cific coa st of

Tohoku, J a pa n ea rthqua ke, Ea rth Pla nets S pa ce, 63(7), 815–820, doi:10.5047/eps.2011.06.010.

Minoura , K., F. Ima mura , D. S uga wa ra , Y. Kono, a nd T. Iwa shita (2001), T he 869 J oga n tsuna mi deposit a nd recurrence interva l of la rge-sca le tsuna mi on the Pa cific coa st of northea st J a pa n, J. Na t.

Disa ster S ci., 23(2), 83–88.Ha shimoto, C., A. Noda , T. S a giya , a nd M. Ma tsu’ura (2009),

Interpla te seismogenic zones a long the Kuril‐ J a pa n trench inferred from GPS da ta inversion, Na t. Geosci., 2, 141–144.

S eno, T., T. S a kura i, a nd S . S tein (1996), Ca n the Okhotst pla te bediscrimina ted from the North America n pla te?, J. Geophys. R es.,

101, 11,305–11,315.Tsuji, Y ., T. T a ka ha shi, a nd K. Ima i (2010), Compa rison of tsuna mi height distributions of the 1960 a nd the 2010 Chilea n ea rthqua kes on the coa sts of the J a pa nese Isla nds, Abstra ct G36A-0832

presented a t 2010 Fa ll Meeting, AGU, S a n Fra ncisco, Ca lif., 13–17 Dec.

References