Top Banner
Impact of Bionic Legs Technology: Improving Proper Gait Mechanics Mark Manning
23

Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Jul 07, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Impact of Bionic Legs Technology:

Improving Proper Gait

Mechanics

Mark Manning

Page 2: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Brief History of Bionic Prosthesis

• 1960

– Sensors were placed directly on vestigal limb

• Used to pick up electrical impulses

– Limitation: Impulses were being picked up from multiple muscles

• Inhibited performance

• 1971 (Jaipur Foot)

– Developed by an Indian surgeron

• Viewed as the pinnacle of prosthetic science

• Mimiced shape of foot, failed to return loss of function

Page 3: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

History of Touch Bionics

• 1993 (David Gow- Bioengineering Centre)

– Developed first partial hand system

• 1998 (First Electronically Powered Shoulder)

• 2007 (Touch Bionics releases I-limb)

– First Prosthetic Hand with articulating fingers

• Silicone covering to mimic human skin

• April 2016 (Ossur partners with Touch Bionics)

– Non-invasive orthopaedics

• Improve mobility through braces & prosthetic limbs

Page 4: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Normal Gait Biomechanics

• Stance Phase – Heel Strike (lasts until foot on the ground) – Early Flat Foot (moment entire foot is on the ground:

COG) • Allows foot to act as a shock absorber

– Early Heel Rise (COG passes in front of neutral) • Foot becomes rigid lever, propels body forward

– Toe Off (start of swing phase)

• Swing Phase – Running (involves ‘float’ phase= both feet elevated off

the ground)

Page 5: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Common Foot/Ankle Prosthesis Currently on the Market:

• SACH (Solid Ankle-Cushion Heel)

– Foam cosmetic foot shaped

• Wedge cushion in the heel, compresses with each step – Internal supportive structure

• Single/Multi Axis Ankle

– Hinged ankle joint

• Rubber Bumpers absorbs ankle motion caused by body weight

– Multi-axis: Permits rocking motion

• Insufficient stored energy return

Page 6: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Foot/Ankle Prosthesis: Utilizing in Stored Energy

• ID25, IC40, Genesis II, Talux Foot

• Luxon DP, Modular III, Variflex Flex Foot

– Internal structure acts as a spring mechanism

• Spring stores energy

• Energy is returned to amputee, provides forward propulsion as ‘toes’ leave ground

– Terrain adapting features

• Absorb irregularities on ground

• Improve performance on inclined surface

Page 7: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Common Prosthetic Knees for Artificial Limbs

• Single Axis Constant Friction Knee

– Set for each patient’s walking speed

• Stiffens if person walks slower

• Pneumatic & Hydraulic Swing Control Knee

– Uses principles of fluid mechanics

• Varies resistance as user changes walking speed

• Prosthetic always remains in the correct position during heel contact

Page 8: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Limitations on Normal Gait Mechanics

• Carbon-Fiber Based Prosthetics – Devices are overly stiff leading to chronic back

problems

– Spring mechanism replaces normal gait • Shift in balance can lead to joint problems

– Cannot mimic natural gait patterns • Causes patients to compensate by using other muscle

groups

– Can eventually leads to muscle degeneration and osteoarthritis

Page 9: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

First Step in Bionic Legs: BiOM Ankle System

• Developed by Hugh Herr at MIT – Biomechatronics Group

• Works independently from the brain • Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon

and calf muscles – Propels patient upwards and forward with

each step – Robotics replace muscle and tendon function in the lower limb

– Components: – Lithium, Polymer Battery – Microprocessors – Sensors

Page 10: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Advancements in Prosthetic Technology

• Carbon-fiber spring controls each step

– Toe-Off (battery-powered motor)

– Heel Strike (loads spring w/ Potential Energy)

• Algorithm measures the angle and speed of each successive heel strike

– Provides user with the ability to adjust to real-time changes in terrain

Page 11: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Advantages from the BiOM Ankle System

• Energy return – BiOM: 100-200% of body's potential

energy (generated from heel strike) is returned to the system

– Passive Carbon-Fiber: only returns roughly 50-90% of the patients downward energy

• Reaction to Changes in Environment – Microprocessors and sensors:

– Allows BiOM to mimic the body’s natural motion

Page 12: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

BiOM Ankle System: Human Impact

• Improving Amputee Patients overall Quality of Life

– Replaces loss of muscle function

– Exhibits less stress of the prosthetic and user

• Allows normal/proper gait mechanics

– Stimulates natural human motion

• Improves balance and sustains musclar function

Page 13: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Future Research for the BiOM Ankle System

• Improvements in normal gait motion

– Ability to walk further(distance) and faster(speed)

• Body expends less energy

– Decrease muscle fatigue and pain experienced by users

• Allow rapid, real-time response to changes

– Improve balance

– Reduces the risk of falling

Page 14: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Revolutionary Research in Neurologically Controlled

Prosthesis

• Greater difficulty replacing functional control in lower extremity prosthetics

– Less conscious control required for lower extremity movement

– Self-controls occurs through innate reflexes

• Triggered by the spinal cord

• Automatically adjusted by neuromuscular system

Page 15: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Development of the IMES (Implanted Myoelectric Sensor)

• Alfred Mann Foundation – Implanted to remnant muscles in limb

• Coiled Wire-receiver (picks up impulses and transmitted wirelessly to robotic limb computer)

• Robotic Limb and IMES – Cybinetic spinal cord

• Delivers unconsicous command to prosthesis

• Enables instantaneous control of movmements

– Reflexes delivers myoelectric impulses which control the Bionic prosthetic

Page 16: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Ossur Sensor-Linked Limbs

• Components – IMES Sensors (embedded in muscle tissue)

• Adjusts angle of foot during diff. points in stride

– Proprio Foot (motorized battery powered ankle)

• Readily compatible with bionic feet, knees and legs – Computerized smart limbs

• Capable of real-time learning

• Self-adjusting gait patterns – Adapts to changes in terrain and speed

Page 17: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Subconscious Control over a Prosthetic Limb

• Prosthesis moves based on the location of the activated sensors

– Sensors are implanted in either the front or rear of the prosthesis

• Respond to impulses generated in local muscle tissue

• Electrical impulse is delivered from the brain to the base of the leg

– Sensors transmit signal wirelessly to proprio foot

Page 18: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Improvements in Gait Mechanics with Ossur Sensor-Linked Limbs

• Commands reach the foot before residual muscles are able to contract

– Prevents unnatural lag from occuring

– Patient elicits subconscious, real-time control

– Allows quicker more natural response time and movement

– Re-distributes patients body weight

• Preventing further complications due to muscular compensation

Page 19: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Sensor-Linked Limb: Maintaining Muscular Functioning

• Patient is required to actively use remaining lower leg muscles

– Reverses detoriation of muscle fibers from occuring in amputee patients

– Restores some level of functioning in the limb

– Promotes muscle growth, muscle endurance and stamina

Page 20: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Ossur: Minimizing Invasive Surgerical Interventions

• Surgery Intervention

– 15 minute procedure conducted by an orthopedic surgeon

– Less than 1 cm incisions made to place sensors within muscle tissue

• Sensors don't have to be attached to specific nerves

– Powered by a magnetic coil

• Eliminates need to replace battery

Page 21: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Limitations in the Field of Bionics

• BiOM T2

– Cost: $40,000

• Ossur Sensor-Linked Limb (TBD)

• Over 900 BiOM ankle systems currently being used

• Military Veterans (50%)

– Insurance

• Reduces prevelance of: – Dependence on painkillers (potential drug

abuse)

– Osterarthitis treatments

Page 22: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Future Research

• Large Scale Clincal trials

– 3-5 years away from released to public

• Non-invasive surgerical options

• Full user-control over device

• Increase accessiblity for amputee patients

– Important in preventing muscle atrophy from occurring

Page 23: Impact of Bionic Legs Technology–Biomechatronics Group •Works independently from the brain •Simulates action of ankle, Achilles tendon and calf muscles –Propels patient upwards

Works Citied

• "Biomechanics of Walking (Gait)." Foot Education. Generate Press, 2013. Web. 4 Nov. 2016.

• Brown, Shawn. "SRT Prosthetics & Orthotics - BiOM | Ohio & Indiana." SRT Prosthetics and Orthotics. SRT, 03 Nov. 2016. Web. 11 Nov. 2016.

• "Custom Prosthetic Services - Lower Extremity Products." Lower Extremity Products. Custom Prosthetic Services, 2015. Web. 15 Nov. 2016.

• "History." Touch Bionics: Leading Upper Limb Prosthetics Provider. Touch Bionics, 2016. Web. 9 Nov. 2016

• "Prosthetic Limbs, Controlled by Thought." The New York Times. The New York Times, 20 May 2015. Web. 8 Nov. 2016.

• Slater, Matthew. "Is This the Future of Robitc Legs?" Smithsonian Magazine. Smithsonian, Nov. 2014. Web. 6 Nov. 2016.

• Sofge, Erik. "Brain-Controlled Bionic Legs Are Finally Here." Popular Science. Technology, 20 May 2015. Web. 4 Nov. 2016.

• Szondy, David. "Breakthrough Bionic Leg Prosthesis Controlled by Subconscious Thoughts." Breakthrough Bionic Leg Prosthesis Controlled by Subconscious Thoughts. New Atlas, 24 May 2015. Web. 5 Nov. 2016. Szondy, David. "Breakthrough Bionic Leg Prosthesis Controlled by Subconscious Thoughts." Breakthrough Bionic Leg Prosthesis Controlled by Subconscious Thoughts. New Atlas, 24 May 2015. Web. 5 Nov. 2016.