Ilulissat Climate Days, Greenland, 4 June 2015 Greenland – a white spot on the Greenland – a white spot on the map of the internationally map of the internationally coordinated glacier monitoring? coordinated glacier monitoring? Michael Zemp , Richard Armstrong, Florence Fetterer, Isabelle Gärtner-Roer, Martin Hoelzle, Fabia Hüsler, Andreas Kääb, Jeff Kargel, Nico Mölg, Samuel Nussbaumer, Frank Paul, Bruce Raup
18
Embed
Ilulissat Climate Days, Greenland, 4 June 2015 Greenland – a white spot on the map of the internationally coordinated glacier monitoring? Michael Zemp,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ilulis
sat C
limat
e D
ays,
Gre
en
lan
d, 4
Ju
ne 2
01
5
Greenland – a white spot on the map of Greenland – a white spot on the map of the internationally coordinated glacier the internationally coordinated glacier
monitoring?monitoring?
Michael Zemp, Richard Armstrong, Florence Fetterer, Isabelle Gärtner-Roer, Martin Hoelzle, Fabia Hüsler, Andreas
Kääb, Jeff Kargel, Nico Mölg, Samuel Nussbaumer, Frank Paul, Bruce Raup
Greenland – a white spot on the map of the int. coordinated glacier monitoring?
www.discover-the-world.co.uk
Glaciers around the GISHow much glacier ice around the GIS?
How fast are these glacier changing?
Do we have a double counting in sea level rise contribution from Greenland?
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
International Council for Science (ICSU):
“A basic requirement for advancing research is free and unrestricted international sharing of high-quality, long-term, and standardized data and information products.”
As a consequence, the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) set in place a Global Terrestrial Network (GTN) for all Essential Climate Variables in support of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
www.gtn-g.org
Glacier distribution around the Greenland Ice Sheet
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Weidick (1998): >70,000 km2
Weidick (1998)
Glaciers surface area
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
www.gtn-g.org
Weidick (1998): >70,000 km2
Rastner et al. (2012): 20,280 glaciers > 0.05 km2
89,720 km2 (CL0&CL1)
130,076 km2 (CL0&CL1&CL2)
70 Landsat scenes 1999-2002
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Rastner et al (2012)
Gärtner-Roer et al. (2014)
Glaciers volume
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Radic & Hock (2010) based on WGI17,865 km3 = 44 mm SLE
Huss & Farinotti (2012) based on RGI19,042 km3 = 47 mm SLE
Radic & Hock (2010) based on WGI17,865 km3 = 44 mm SLE
Huss & Farinotti (2012) based on RGI19,042 km3 = 47 mm SLE
Uncertainty: 30-50%(Gärtner-Roer et al. 2013)
www.gtn-g.org
Glaciers volume
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Radic & Hock (2010) based on WGI17,865 km3 = 44 mm SLE
Huss & Farinotti (2012) based on RGI19,042 km3 = 47 mm SLE
Uncertainty: 30-50%(Gärtner-Roer et al. 2013)
www.gtn-g.org
Knecht (2014)
Glacier changes
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Front variations from 78 glaciers Back to mid 19th century
Leclercq et al. (2012)
www.gtn-g.org
Glacier changes
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
Front variations from 78 glaciers Back to mid 19th century
Glaciol. balances from 8 glaciers Mittivakkat since 1995
Freya since 2007
Amitsuloq 1981-90
Geodetic balances from 1 glacier
Flade Isblink Ice Cap 2002-09
www.gtn-g.org
Glacier changes
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
From glaciological and geodetic obs.:
Ba1980s/90s/00s: -0.6/-0.9/-1.1 m w.e. a-1
SLR contribution: 50-100 Gt per year
…but based on very few glaciers!
…representativeness for SLR contr.?
www.gtn-g.org
Zemp et al. (in press)
Glacier changes
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
From glaciological and geodetic obs.:
Ba1980s/90s/00s: -0.6/-0.9/-1.1 m w.e. a-1
SLR contribution: 50-100 Gt per year
…but based on very few glaciers!
…representativeness for SLR contr.?
From ICESat based on Bolch et al. (2013):
SLR contribution 2003-08…
..28 Gt per year for C0&C1
..41 Gt per year for C0&C1&C2
=> 2.5 times the specific mass loss of the GIS
=> up to 20% of the GIS contribution to SLR
Bolch et al. (2013)
Do we have a double-counting in SLR contribution from Greenland?
Gardner et al. (2013)
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
www.discover-the-world.co.uk
ConclusionsOver the past five years, we have strongly improved our knowledge about glaciers around the Greenland Ice Sheet.
However, we still need…
..more, longer, and richer obs. series
..a better coordination between the glacier and the ice sheet research communities,
Need for glacier data?
(GCOS need a home for the ice sheet data…)
www.gtn-g.org
Kääb et al. (2013)
Elevation changes from ICESat
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions
gtn-glaciers ¦ distribution ¦ changes ¦ conclusions