Top Banner
ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

ILC Damping Ring Kickers

Presenter: Josef Frisch

Dec 7, 2004

Page 2: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Basic kicker types

• Conventional pulser (Remainder of this presentation).– High voltage pulse driving (probably) strip line kicker– Simple, minimal impedance problems (screen electrodes)– May require exotic pulser.

• RF kicker– Pulsed RF source driving low Q deflection structure. – Makes use of available high power, broadband RF sources– Possible impedance issues

• Resonant deflection system– Uses multiple resonant cavities driven with a set of frequencies

to select bunches– Multiple designs – too varied to discuss here– Quasi-CW RF eliminates ringing, provides good stability– Impedance, RF kicks within bunches, etc need to be understood.

Page 3: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Approximate requirements for pulsed kicker

• Deflection angle 0.6 mrad (0.01 T-M) for TESLA ring design

• If we allow 10 Meter total kicker length– Need 50 Amp kicker drive

• Length of each kicker << bunch spacing (assuming speed of light kicker).– For 3 nanosecond, need ~20 Kickers

• Stripline kicker impedance probably ~100 Ohms (assuming speed of light kicker)

• Pulsers: 5Kv, 50Amp, 20 units, 2nanosecond rise and fall time .– Just for scale: Actual specifications depend on detailed ring

design• Un-kicked bunches must not be disturbed by more than

7x10-4 of kicked bunch.

Page 4: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Basic Extraction Scheme

Page 5: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Comments on Basic Scheme

• Shortest ring for given current– No unused bunches, or gaps (except ion clearing).

• Tight requirements on kicker stability and fall time– Need to not disturb neighboring bunches by more

than 7x10-4 of kicked bunch

• Falling edge of a pulse typically more difficult to control than rising edge. – Ringing from impedance mismatches, stray

inductance etc.

Page 6: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Buffer pulse scheme

Page 7: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Comments on buffer pulse scheme

• “Buffer” pulses are not needed for luminosity– Can probably kick by 10-2 of main kick– Allows longer settling time to 7x10-4.

• Need to replace buffer pulses– May be tricky with positrons if bunches are generated

by main electron beam: Might need to waste a machine cycle.

• Slightly longer ring for same average current.

Page 8: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Kicker Gap Scheme

Page 9: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Comments on Kicker Gap Scheme

• Gap allows extraction kicker with fast rise, but unrestricted settling for next pulse, settle to 7x10-4 after gap

• Injection kicker (larger pulse) only needs 1% interference with preceding bunch, and 1% after gap.

• Scheme does not work if positrons generated by luminosity generating electron beam– Works if you have a pre-damping ring.

• Scheme requires that ring empty, then re-fill in 2 milliseconds – might cause ring stability problems.

Page 10: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Kicker Gap Extraction & Injection

Injection and extraction with fast rise slow fall if DR size is not determined by kicker rise time

Page 11: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Comments on Kicker Gap Scheme

• Average ring current constant

• Allows use of slow fall time kicker

• Requires 2X ring length for same bunch spacing.

• Beam current harmonic content changes– DR physics question

Page 12: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Kicker Driver Requirements

• 20 Units• ~5KV, 50Amps

– Depends on damping ring design, kicker length, etc– 250KW peak power– 2.5KW, average power, 1 millisecond– 25 Watt long term average

• Few nanosecond rise and fall, with settling to <7x10-4 for preceding and following pulses.

Page 13: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Snap / Step Diodes

• <50 picoseconds to 20V. • sub-nanosecond to 300V, 6 Amps.

(1800W peak). • High power devices from Institute of

Electrophysics– 600 picosecond to 1000 Amps (?? Voltage)– 5 nanosecond to 400KV. – Repetition rates to few KHz.

• Power dissipation probably limits rep rate.

Page 14: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Step recovery diode pulses

Very fast high voltage pulsesRepetition rate limited to ~KHz(for these devices).

Institute of Electrophysics

Page 15: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Avalanche Transistors• Avalanche Transistors

– <200 picoseconds to 200V, ~50 Amps (10KW)

– Arrays (tapered transmission lines) demonstrated to 40KV, 800A, 200ps. (Kentech)

– Recovery time too long except in liquid nitrogen (50nsec reported)

– Average power limited to ~1W / device.

– Combining may lead to ringing.

• Low Repetition Rate

40 KV in 200ps rise time (Kentech)

Page 16: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

MOSFETs• Individual devices to ~1Kv, ~50Amps, ~3ns rise and fall

times. • Variety of combining schemes to high power, medium

fast rise. – DARHT-2 kicker: 20KV, 10ns rise / fall, 1.6MHz burst ( 4 pulses)– Belkhe / TESLA: 7.5Kv, 72A, 5.3ns, 1MHz (200 pulses). (fall

time slower)– Belkhe – datasheet 3Kv, 80A, 2ns, 1 MHz (MAX) burst. (10

pulses). – Kentech: 10Kv, 2ns – could operate at high rate.

• Relatively low impedance – (~10 Ohms), stray inductance ringing can be a problem– Gate drive is very low impedance <<1 Ohm.

• Probably OK for ~10 nsec rise / fall times. (maybe faster)• May be used as driver for additional stage / compressor

Page 17: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

MOSFET Pulses

4MHz pulses, but with 18ns risetime

Page 18: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

More MOSFET pulses (Kentech)

5 channels

Lower voltage2.5MHz pulser

Page 19: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

MOSFET pulser comments

• Very likely to use MOSFET technology in pulser – maybe with shock line for compression.

• Some designs (Belkhe) are very fast but have limited repetition rate. Problem is not thermal – but design in proprietary.

Page 20: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Shock Lines - Ferromagnetic• Nonlinear transmission line: Wave velocity increases with pulse voltage• “Sharpens” front end of pulse• Ferromagnetic (most common): (used for SLAC Kicker (Cassel)• 95KV, 380 Picoseconds rise (Seddon et al, 1987), Ferroxcube B2 ferrite

Page 21: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Shock Lines – Ferromagnetic (SLAC)

Page 22: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Ferromagnetic Shock Lines, Falling edge

Page 23: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Shock Lines - others

• Ferroelectric– 20KV, 400 Picosecond (Oxford – Web report)

• Diode loaded line– Monolithic (Allen, 1994 thesis), 4V at <700

Femtoseconds! (expect <170 fsec in future)

• Vacuum Magnetron line: – At high voltages, magnetic field insulates line– Probably only applicable at higher power than

we require.

Page 24: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Shock Lines - comments

• Most work in shock lines has been to obtain very fast, very high power pulses – well beyond our requirements

• Typically operated at low repetition rates.• Need to eliminate (typical) slow tail from release of

energy stored in non-linear material. • For ILC high repetition rate may lead to heating

problems (need low loss nonlinear material). • Ferromagnetic and ferroelectric materials tend to also

have magnetostrictive / piezoelectric effect– For millisecond pulse burst could lead to stability problems.

• Many non-linear materials have strong temperature sensitivity – may lead to stability problems.

Page 25: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Hard Tube Switches

• Pulser based on Eimac Y-690 tube used for Pockels Cell drive at SLAC (M. Browne, D. Brown). – 6KV, 30 Amps, <1.5ns rise time.– Driven by avalanche transistors – not appropriate for

high repetition rate– Would need to parallel 2 tubes for ILC kicker (easy)

• Nonlinearity of tubes helps with settling time. • Average power “not unreasonable” but would

need to check. (grid dissipation)

Page 26: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Hard Tube Pulser

Note, tail on pulse believed to be due to output Transformer (not needed for ILC kicker)

Page 27: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Custom Tube Pulser

Page 28: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Custom tube Comments

• Single beam switched between multiple (~20) Anodes.

• Tube parameters comparable to other big power tubes (klystrons).

• Something of this sort would very likely work, but would require a large development effort.

• Only consider if conventional pulsers will not work.

Page 29: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Kicker Magnet

• Probably need speed of light kicker• Kicker fill time + pulse rise time -> effective rise

time– Need short (< 1 Meter) kickers.

• Need to avoid reflections / ringing– Must be designed as a RF component– Full E+M simulation / optimization

• Possibly shield beamline with thin screen (to block beam wakefields (~10GHz), but transmit kicker fields (~300 MHz).

• Want optimized design to minimize kicker power

Page 30: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Stability / Settling time issues

• Multiplicity of kickers helps with random noise

• Reproducible and small settling time problems can be fixed with additional kicker driven by AWG and power amplifier.

• Probably want feed forward from beam position / angle out of ring to kicker in main beam line– Assumes turn-around after damping ring

Page 31: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Correction Scheme

Page 32: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Correction Scheme - variant

Page 33: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Correction scheme / layout issues.

• The 7x10-4 stability specification is Heroic!– Difficult to measure without a beam line

(ATF?)

• The kicker driver will likely have pulse – pulse feedback to flatten the waveforms

• Would like a beamline arrangement which allows feed-forward from output beam

Page 34: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Ongoing Work

• ATF Damping Ring in Japan: Proposal to build a single pulse extraction system– Good test bed for kickers, and stabilization– Provide ILC – like test beam (~200 bunches)– Requires higher Kicker drive power than ILC

• Working on kicker / optics design to reduce

• DHART FET pulser -> shock line– Test high repetition rate shock lines

• DESY working on paralleling Belkhe pulsers to increase repetition rate.

• SLAC to obtain Belkhe pulser for testing shock lines.

Page 35: ILC Damping Ring Kickers Presenter: Josef Frisch Dec 7, 2004.

Overall Comments

• Can probably build a kicker to meet any likely damping ring requirements, for a small fraction of the damping ring cost– Optimize the ring design, see what is needed.

• Best guess: MOSFETs driving Ferromagnetic shock line. – Hard tubes an option.

• Custom tube can probably solve the problem, but expensive to develop – leave as a backup plan.

• Want technology demonstration prototypes soon, to allow selection of technology, and system development.

• Kicker parameters (voltage, current, etc) depend on details of ring design.