Top Banner

of 17

IJE-ZC2DPLL

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

RamaDinakaran
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    1/17

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    This article was downloaded by: [INFLIBNET India Order]

    On: 15 December 2009

    Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 909878480]

    Publisher Taylor & Francis

    Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-

    41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    International Journal of Electronics

    Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713599654

    Chaos intermittency and control of bifurcation in a ZC

    2

    -DPLL

    Tanmoy Banerjee a; Bishnu Charan Sarkar aaDepartment of Physics, University of Burdwan, Burdwan, India

    To cite this ArticleBanerjee, Tanmoy and Sarkar, Bishnu Charan(2009) 'Chaos, intermittency and control of bifurcation ina ZC

    2-DPLL', International Journal of Electronics, 96: 7, 717 732

    To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00207210902851431

    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207210902851431

    Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf

    This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial orsystematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

    The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug dosesshould be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directlyor indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

    http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713599654http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207210902851431http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfhttp://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207210902851431http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713599654
  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    2/17

    Chaos, intermittency and control of bifurcation in a ZC2-DPLL

    Tanmoy Banerjee and Bishnu Charan Sarkar*

    Department of Physics, University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713104, India

    (Received 14 July 2008; final version received 24 January 2009)

    Nonlinear dynamics of a dual sampler-based zero crossing digital phase lock loop(ZC2-DPLL) has been investigated. Analysis supported by detailed numericalstudies shows that the system enters a chaotic state through a cascade of perioddoubling bifurcation. The dynamics of the system have been quantified with the

    dynamical measures of Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension. Further,it has been found that for certain system parameters intermittency occurs in thesystem. The occurrence of intermittency has been proved using the PomeauManneville principle. The phenomenon of bifurcation control in a ZC2-DPLLusing time delay feedback has been explored. It has been found that for somesuitably chosen control parameters bifurcation phenomena can be controlled suchthat the stable locked zone of a bifurcation controlled ZC2-DPLL can beextended, which enhances the application potentiality of a ZC2-DPLL.

    Keywords: digital phase locked loop; stability analysis; bifurcation control;intermittency; chaos

    1. Introduction

    Studies on nonlinear dynamics of different nonlinear electronic systems have

    attracted researchers for at least three decades. Occurrence of complex behaviours

    like bifurcation, chaos, intermittency, etc. in electronic systems has been revealed

    from these studies (Kilias, Kelber, Mogel and Schwarz 1995; Chen, Chau and Chan

    1999; Giannakopoulos and Deliyannis 2005). Further, control of chaos and

    bifurcation in electronic circuits and systems is an active field of research (Chen,

    Hill and Yu 2003; Collado and Suarez 2005). By controlling chaos and bifurcation

    one can suppress chaotic behaviour where it is unwanted (e.g. in power electronics

    and mechanical systems) and on the other hand, in electronic systems, one can

    harness the richness of chaotic behaviour in chaos-based electronic communication

    systems. In fact, the possibility of exploiting the chaotic signal in chaos-based secure

    communication systems has boosted up the research on the chaotic dynamics of

    electronic circuits and systems (Kennedy, Rovatti and Setti 2000). Among all the

    electrical systems, the phase locked loop (PLL) is probably the most widely studied

    system owing to its application potentiality in synchronous communication systems

    and rich nonlinear dynamical behaviour (Gardner 1979; Kudrewicz and Wasowicz

    2007). At the advent of digital communication systems digital phase locked loops

    (DPLLs) have rapidly replaced the conventional analogue PLLs because they

    *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

    International Journal of Electronics

    Vol. 96, No. 7, July 2009, 717732

    ISSN 0020-7217 print/ISSN 1362-3060 online

    2009 Taylor & Francis

    DOI: 10.1080/00207210902851431

    http://www.informaworld.com

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    3/17

    overcome the problems of sensitivity to DC drift, periodic adjustment and the

    building of higher order loops (Lindsey and Chie 1981). DPLLs are widely used in

    frequency demodulators, frequency synthesisers, data and clock synchronisers,

    modems, digital signal processors and hard disk drives to name a few (Zoltowski

    2001; Mannino et al. 2006). A DPLL is a discrete time nonlinear feedback controlled

    system: as such its nonlinear behaviour is difficult and it poses exact solutions only in

    particular cases. To understand the complete behaviour of a DPLL we have to resort

    to modern nonlinear dynamical tools of bifurcation and chaos theories. Also in this

    regard bifurcation control of DPLL has not been explored yet. The study of

    nonlinear dynamics of DPLLs has two-fold application. First, using the insight of

    nonlinear behaviours of DPLLs one can design an optimum DPLL system. Second,

    by characterising the chaos from DPLLs, one can explore the possibility of using

    DPLLs in chaos-based secure electronic communication systems. So in these

    contexts, motivations are always there to explore the nonlinear dynamics of DPLLs.

    In the previous studies on the nonlinear dynamics of DPLLs, positive zero crossing

    DPLLs (ZC1-DPLL) (Bernstein, Liberman and Lichtenberg 1989; Leonov andSeledzhi 2005; Banerjee and Sarkar 2005ac; Banerjee and Sarkar 2008a), uniform

    sampling DPLLs (Zoltowski 2001), bang-bang DPLLs (Dalt 2005) and tanlock

    DPLLs (Hussain and Boashash 2002) were of main interest but work on the

    nonlinear dynamics of dual sampler-based zero crossing DPLLs (ZC2-DPLL) is yet

    to be reported. Unlike a ZC1-DPLL, in a ZC2-DPLL sampling is done at the positive

    and negative zero crossings of the input signal. For this particular sampling

    technique it has wide frequency acquisition range in comparison with a ZC 1-DPLL

    and that is why ZC2-DPLLs have drawn the attention of researchers for a long time

    (Majumdar 1979; Frias and Rocha 1980; Banerjee and Sarkar 2006).

    This article investigates the nonlinear dynamics of a ZC2-DPLL using nonlineardynamical theoretical and computational tools. The bifurcation and chaos in the

    system have been explored. Also the chaotic behaviour is quantified through

    dynamical measures namely, the Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension.

    Further, the occurrence of intermittency in a ZC2-DPLL has been investigated and a

    proper scaling behaviour has been explored using PomeauManneville principle.

    Subsequently, we explore the possibility of bifurcation control in a ZC2-DPLL using

    the time delay feedback control method (Pyragas 1992). It has been found that for

    some suitably chosen control parameters, a bifurcation controlled ZC2-DPLL

    (BCDPLL) has an extended stability zone and larger frequency acquisition range in

    comparison with a conventional ZC2-DPLL (CDPLL), which will make it more

    suitable in practical applications.

    This article is organised in the following manner. The following section describes

    the system structure and system equation formulation. In section 3, a bifurcation

    analysis has been carried out. The nonlinear dynamical measures such as the

    Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension of a ZC2-DPLL have also been

    reported in this section. Section 4 examines the effect of bifurcation control

    technique on a ZC2-DPLL using analytical and numerical tools. Finally, section 5

    summarises the outcome of the whole study.

    2. System description and system equation formulationFigure 1 shows the block diagram of a ZC2-DPLL. It contains two positive edge

    triggered samplers. The input signal is fed directly into sampler-1 and a p-shifted

    718 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    4/17

    version of the input signal is fed into sampler-2. To formulate the system equation

    consider e(t) to be the noise-free analogue input signal to the system with a phase

    angleyi(t) relative to the loop DCO phase. Mathematically,

    et A0sin o0t yit 1

    whereyi(t) (oio0)t y0andA0,oi,y0are the amplitude, angular frequency andphase of the input signal, respectively. o0 is the nominal angular frequency of the

    DCO having time period T. Writing the sampled version ofe(t) at the kth sampling

    instant (SI)t(k) asx(k), one can write the output signals of sampler-1 and sampler-2,

    respectively as follows (Majumdar 1979):

    x1 k0 A0sin o0t k

    0 yi k0 k0 2k 2

    x1

    k00

    A

    0sin o

    0t k00

    y

    i k00

    p

    k00

    2k

    1

    3

    wherek 0,1,2,3 . . . . Here SIs are occurring at the end of each half period of theDCO (unlike positive zero crossing DPLL (ZC1-DPLL), where SIs occur at the end

    of each full period of DCO).

    The sequence {x(k)}, k 0,1,2 . . . is filtered digitally by a loop digital filter(LDF). In a first-order loop, the transfer function of LDF is written as a constant

    gain G1 (s/V). The LDF output sequence is given by yk G1x(k). The sequences{y(k)} are used to control the next half period of the DCO. The kth half periodT0(k)

    of DCO can be written as,

    T0k Tk=2 tk1 tk; 4

    Figure 1. Functional block diagram of a ZC2-DPLL.

    International Journal of Electronics 719

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    5/17

    in terms of thekth and (k 1)-st SIs, respectively. The DCO periodT(k 1) at thatinstant is governed by the relation

    Tk1 T

    2

    yk 5

    Assuming t(0) 0, we get

    tk kT

    2

    Xk1i0

    yi; 6

    thus the sampler output at the kth instant is,

    xk A0sin fk 7

    where,

    jk yik o0Xk1i0

    yi 8

    is the phase error between the input signal and the DCO output at t(k). Now, one

    can get the phase governing equation of the ZC2-DPLL as,

    f k1 f k p z1 12

    zK1sinf k ; 9

    where z has been substituted in place of (oi/o0). Also where K1 A0o0G1 is theclosed loop gain of ZC2-DPLL.

    3. Nonlinear dynamics of ZC2-DPLL

    3.1. Analytical bifurcation analysis

    System (9) can be treated as a one-dimensional sine circle map fk1 f(f) and westudy its dynamics near the fixed point. A fixed point x* is defined as a point for

    which the condition,f(x*) x* is satisfied. In the present case, fixed point is a stablelocked state characterised by the steady-state phase errorfsfrom Equation (9). The

    steady-state phase error can be calculated as,

    fs sin1 2L0

    zK1

    ; 10

    whereL0 p(z 7 1). For stable loop operation the conditionL0 zK1/2 should beobeyed. The system will converge to a fixed point if the following condition is

    maintained (Osborne 1980),

    f0jsj j< 1; 11

    720 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    6/17

    which in turn gives,

    1zK1

    2 cosfs

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    7/17

    Equations (13), (16) and (17). Similarly, Figure 2b shows the bifurcation diagram for

    a frequency step input (with z 1.1). It is seen that bifurcation occurs at

    (K1z)2

    7 4L02

    16 (In the numerical simulations for frequency step input, wehave taken the values of the initial phase inside thebasin of attractionof the system,

    i.e. after a transient state finally all the initial values give bound solutions for the

    system.). It can also be seen from Figure 2 that, with the increase ofK1 the system

    goes to chaotic state through a period doubling bifurcation. Simulation results

    confirm that ZC2-DPLL has no other route to chaos other than the period doubling

    route. The chaotic behaviour of the loop has been studied in the next section.

    3.2. Quantifying chaos in a ZC2 DPLL

    Because the present system is a one-dimensional system it has only one Lyapunov

    exponent. The Lyapunov exponent of a ZC2-DPLL can be defined as,

    l limN!1

    1

    N

    XNi1

    ln 1zK1

    2 cosfi

    : 18

    We calculate the Lyapunov exponent for the ZC2-DPLL with the help of Equation

    (18) by taking the number of iterationsN 50,000, which is sufficiently large for thepresent system. Figure 3a shows the plot of the Lyapunov exponent (l) with the

    control parameterK1forz 1. At K1 2, it shows a super stable cycle (i.e. l goes

    to negative infinity). At K1 4, l becomes zero, it indicates that first bifurcationoccurs at this value of system parameter. Also at K1 6.28, period four oscillationoccurs. A positive Lyapunov exponent is a sign of chaos and K17lplot shows that

    Figure 2. Bifurcation diagram of a ZC2-DPLL for (a) a phase step input (z 1) and (b) afrequency step input (z 6 1) with K1 as the control parameter.

    722 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    8/17

    the system becomes chaotic at K1 7.1. Sudden jumps of l into the negativeLyapunov region indicate the presence of periodic windows interspersed into the

    chaotic zone. The Lyapunov spectrum of the system is well agreed with

    the bifurcation diagram of Figure 2a. Similarly, Figure 3b shows the spectrum of

    the largest Lyapunov exponent of ZC2-DPLL for z 1.1.The correlation dimension is also a quantitative measure of chaos. To compute it

    first we have to find the correlation integral defined as,

    Cd

    2

    NN1XNi0

    XNji1 H ddij

    : 19

    Nis the number of data points used in the time series (here we use N 50,000),Histhe Heaviside function, dijis the spatial separation between two data points labeled i

    andjin the phase space anddis a set of pre-assigned values. A detailed procedure for

    finding the correlation dimension with the GrassbergerProcaccia algorithm can be

    found in Grassberger and Procaccia (1983). Since the present system is embedded in

    one dimension with dij jfi7fjj and we have the opportunity of knowing therelevant variables, we do not have to resort to time delay technique (Sprott 2003).

    Correlation dimension (D2) o f Z C2-DPLL at chaotic region (K1 8) can be

    computed from the slope of the log C(d) vs. log dcurve (Figure 4). The correlationdimension of the system is found to be D2 0.83933 + 0.00215, which shows thatthe resulting chaos from a ZC2-DPLL is well defined and low dimensional.

    Figure 3. Lyapunov exponent (l) spectrum of ZC2-DPLL with different gain parameters(K1) for a (a) phase step input (z 1) and (b) frequency step input (z 1.1). PositiveLyapunov exponent indicates the presence of a chaotic attractor.

    International Journal of Electronics 723

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    9/17

    3.3. Intermittency in a ZC2-DPLL

    In its route to chaos, a system may show back and forth switching between

    apparently regular behaviour and chaotic behaviour. This switching occurs even

    though the control parameters remain constant and no significant external noise is

    present (Schuster and Just 2005). This interesting phenomenon is known as

    intermittency. Intermittency of a ZC1-DPLL has been reported elsewhere (Banerjee

    and Sarkar 2008b). In the present work a numerical searching reveals that a ZC2-DPLL shows intermittency for 7.4500 5 K1 5 7.45101. In this range of values of

    K1, a ZC2-DPLL switches back and forth between period-6 and chaotic behaviour.

    The switching appears to occur randomly even though a ZC2-DPLL is described by

    a deterministic iterated map. Figure 5 depicts this phenomenon for four different

    values of K1. In the first trace, periodic behaviour occurs randomly in between

    chaotic behaviour at K1 7.4500. In the second trace of Figure 5, the value ofK1has been slightly changed to K1 7.4505; the trace shows that periodic behaviourdominates over chaotic behaviour. The third trace (K1 7.4509) shows that thechaotic behaviour occurs for a very small time duration. Thus, the system dynamics

    changes rapidly in this region with K1. The lower trace shows that at K1

    7.45101

    system behaviour becomes periodic. Occurrence of intermittency can be explained

    with the help of a cobweb diagram. Figure 6 shows a blow-up view of cobweb

    diagram plotting sixth iterate (f6(f)) along the y-axis and f along the x-axis. At

    K1 7.4505, a gap has been seen in between the map and the 458 diagonal line. Thetrajectory spends certain duration of time in the gap, i.e. in the vicinity of previously

    stable period-6 fixed point. As the gap size decreases (i.e. as theK1values approaches

    7.45101), the trajectory spends more time in the gap. Qualitatively, it can be said that

    more time is spent in periodic behaviour as the parameter approaches the critical

    value Kc, where Kc is the value of K1 at which point the gap vanishes and the

    behaviour becomes exactly periodic. In the present case, Kc 7.45101, i.e. at this

    point the system shows exactly period-6 behaviour. Further, we examine theintermittency occurring in a ZC2-DPLL from the view point of the Pomeau

    Manneville (Manneville and Pomeau 1979) principle. According to this principle the

    Figure 4. Plot between log C(d) vs. log dfor ZC2-DPLL (K1 8, z 1).

    724 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    10/17

    Figure 6. Blowup view of cobweb diagram for different values of K1. Along x-axis f andalongy-axis f6(f) have been plotted.

    Figure 5. Intermittency in a ZC2-DPLL for different values ofK1.

    International Journal of Electronics 725

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    11/17

    average length of the laminar region (i.e. the average number of iterations spent in

    the periodic region) varies with the parameter e (Kc7K1) with a certain scalefactor. To investigate this we have determined the average length hli of the laminarregion for different values of e. Figure 7 shows the plot of hli versus e70.5, whichshows that they have linear dependence. This result obeys PomeauManneville

    principle for a type-I intermittency, which confirms that the intermittency that

    occurs in a ZC2-DPLL is a type-I intermittency.

    4. Bifurcation control in a ZC2-DPLL

    4.1. Time delay feedback in a ZC2-DPLL

    We investigate the feasibility of bifurcation control in a ZC2-DPLL using Pyragass

    time delay feedback technique (Pyragas 1992). Earlier Sarkar and Chattopadhyay

    (1988) proposed this technique for improving the transient behaviour of DPLLs. In

    this article, our aim is to explore the full nonlinear dynamical behaviour of time delay

    feedback-based ZC2-DPLLs from the perspective of bifurcation control. The proposedmodel of bifurcation controlled ZC2-DPLL (BCDPLL) has been shown in Figure 8. It

    has an additional error signal generated as xa(k) P[x(k)7x(k71)]. P is anadditional design parameter that quantifies the coupling strength of error signal

    with the original sampled signal x(k). The DCO period control signal of BCDPLL at

    the kth SI is generated using the digitally filtered version xc(k); where xc(k) is the sum of

    x(k) andxa(k). The control signal atkth SI isy(k), given asG1xc(k). Now, defining the

    signal phase relative to the DCO phase atkth SI asf(k) and using the same procedure

    used in section 2, one can get the phase governing equation of the BCDPLL as,

    f k1 f k p z1 12

    zK1 1P sinf k 12

    PzK1sinf k1 ; 20

    Figure 7. Plot ofhli versus e70.5. Plot shows linear dependency.

    726 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    12/17

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    13/17

    (2) For a frequency step input (z 6 1), the steady-state phase error fs can beobtained from Equation (20) as, fs sin

    71[2L0/(K1)z] 2np, where,n 0,1, 2 . . . andL0 p(z71). It means that, with higher values ofK1, fscan beless. The condition for convergence with a frequency step input is obtained

    using the aforesaid method as,

    0< K1=2 2

    z2 L20

    < 4 12P 2 23

    with K1z 4 0. Here also P can be chosen in a way to enlarge the range ofz

    leading to a stable loop operation in a BCDPLL. If one can extend the lock

    range (i.e. period-1 state) then this would imply that the chaotic behaviour

    would be shown by the system at a larger value of system parameter.

    Also, the frequency acquisition range of BCDPLL can be obtained

    as, pp0:5K1

    < z < pp0:5K1

    , which is broader than that of a CDPLL as

    maximumK1 is more in this case for the new stability condition.

    4.3. Lyapunov exponent of BCDPLL

    To find out the Lyapunov exponent of BCDPLL we have employed Sprotts (2003)

    method for finding the largest Lyapunov exponent of a 2D map. The Lyapunov

    exponentl is given by,

    l limN!1

    1

    2NXN1n0

    ln abY0n

    2 cdY0n2

    1Yn2

    " # 24

    aand dare the diagonal terms of the Jacobian matrix J and b and c are off-diagonal

    terms of the Jacobian matrix J. In the present case, from Equation (21) we get a 0,d 170.5K1z(1 P)cosy(k), b 1 and c 0.5K0zP cos x(k). Y

    0 is the tangent of

    the direction of maximum growth (tangent vector) that evolves in the following

    manner,

    Y0

    n1

    c dY0

    n

    abY0n: 25

    For large numbers of iteration tangents, vector is independent of the initial value

    of Y00.

    4.4. Numerical results

    The system response has been studied through extensive numerical simulation of

    system equations. Figure 9a depicts the bifurcation diagrams of a BCDPLL in the

    face of phase step input (z 1) for different values of control parametersP. It can be

    seen that suitably chosen values of P controls the occurrence of bifurcationphenomenon as predicted in Equation (22). Figure 9b shows that period 2

    bifurcation occurs at K1 8 for z 1 by choosing P 70.25 (unlike K1 4 for

    728 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    14/17

    Figure 9. (a) Bifurcation diagram of BCDPLL with K1 for different values of bifurcationcontrol parameters P (for z 1). Bifurcation diagram of BCDPLL (P 70.25) for a (b)phase step input (z 1) and (c) frequency step input (z 1.1) withK1as the control parameter.

    International Journal of Electronics 729

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    15/17

    a CDPLL; see Figure 2a). Bifurcation diagram of a BCDPLL (P 70.25) withfrequency step input (z 1.1) has been shown in Figure 9c. The obtained results arein complete agreement with the analytical predictions of Equations (22) and (23).

    Also the largest Lyapunov exponent spectrum of BCDPLL with P 70.25 for aphase step (z 1) and frequency step input (z 1.1) have been shown in Figure 10aand b, respectively. These two results agree with bifurcation diagrams. Thus, it can

    be concluded that time delay feedback technique can effectively control the

    occurrence of bifurcation in a ZC2-DPLL.

    5. Conclusion

    The present work reports the nonlinear dynamical studies of a ZC2-DPLL. The

    outcomes of the study can be summarised as follows:

    (1) It has been found that a ZC2-DPLL goes to chaotic state through a cascade

    of period doubling bifurcations. The chaotic state is quantified by dynamical

    measures namely Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension. It has been

    shown that chaos from a ZC2-DPLL is low dimensional and well

    characterised. This well-defined nature of chaos from ZC2-DPLL indicates

    the application potentiality of a ZC2-DPLL in the field of chaos-basedcommunication systems.(2) It has been shown that a ZC2-DPLL depicts

    intermittent behaviour for some values of system parameters. Applying the

    Figure 10. Lyapunov exponent (l) spectrum of BCDPLL (P 70.25) with different K1values for a (a) phase step input (z 1) and (b) frequency step input (z 1.1).

    730 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    16/17

  • 8/11/2019 IJE-ZC2DPLL

    17/17

    Leonov, G., and Seledzhi, S. (2005), Stability and Bifurcations of Phase Locked Loops forDigital Signal Processors, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 15, 13471360.

    Lindsey, W.C., and Chie, C.M. (1981), A Survey of Digital Phase Lock Loops, Proceedingsof IEEE, 69, 410431.

    Majumdar, T. (1979), Range Extension of a Digital Phase Locked-Loop, Proceedings ofIEEE, 67, 15741575.

    Manneville, P., and Pomeau, Y. (1979), Intermittency and Lorenz Model, Physics Letters A,75, 12.

    Mannino, C., Rabah, H., Weber, S., Tanougast, C., Berviller, Y., and Janiaut, M. (2006), ANew ADPLL Architecture Dedicated to Program Clock References Synchronization,International Journal of Electronics, 93, 843861.

    Osborne, H.C. (1980), Stability Analysis of an Nth Power Digital Phase-Locked Loop. I & II.First Order Second and Third Order DPLLs, IEEE Transactions on Communications,COM-28, 13431364.

    Pyragas, K. (1992), Continuous Control of Chaos by Self-Controlling Feedback, PhysicsLetters A, 170, 421428.

    Sarkar, B.C., and Chattopadhyay, S. (1988), Novel Quick-Response Digital Phase-LockedLoop, Electronics Letters, 24, 12631264.

    Schuster, H.G., and Just, W. (2005), Deterministic Chaos: An Introduction. VCH Weinheim,Wiley-VCH.

    Sprott, J.C. (2003), Chaos and Time Series Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Zoltowski, M. (2001), Some Advances and Refinements in Digital Phase Locked Loops

    (DPLLs), Signal processing, 81, 735789.

    732 T. Banerjee and B.C. Sarkar