Top Banner

of 20

ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

Apr 14, 2018

Download

Documents

Annisa Rahma
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    1/20

    IFRS and Indonesian GAAP (PSAK):similarities and differences

    www.pwc.com/id

    October 2012

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    2/20

    This publication provides a summary of the keydifferences between the Indonesian Financial

    Accounting Standards (IFAS or PSAK) andthe International Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS) that are required for annual reportingperiods beginning on 1 January 2012.

    This publication does not include the specic

    requirements applicable for listed companies asprescribed by the Capital Market and FinancialInstitutions Supervisory Board (Bapepam-LK).Please refer to the other specic publication on thismatter.

    This summary is not a substitute for readingthe accounting standards and interpretationsthemselves. While every effort has been made

    to ensure accuracy, this publication is notcomprehensive and information may have beenomitted which may be relevant to a particular user.

    No responsibility for loss to any person actingor refraining from acting as a result of anymaterial in this publication can be accepted byKAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC).Recipients should not act on the basis of this

    publication without seeking professional advice.No part of this publication may be reproducedby any method without the prior consent of KAPTanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    3/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 1

    This year, we have reached another substantial milestone in theconvergence process of aligning PSAK with the InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Accounting Standards

    Board of the Indonesian Institute of Accountants has introducedno less than 22 revised and new standards that are effectivethis nancial year, some of which are highly complex in theirapplication. The implementation of these new standards willsubstantially align PSAK with IFRS issued by the IASB as at 1January 2009.

    As the convergence process from PSAK to IFRS was performed ona gradual basis, Indonesia has not yet fully adopted IFRS. There

    are several updates to IFRS that have not been adopted in PSAK. Asa result, there are still a number of differences between IFRS andPSAK that are required for annual reporting periods beginning on 1January 2012.

    This publication is aimed to highlight these key differencesand enable users to better understand in the preparation of thenancial statements under IFRS and PSAK. We encourage you toconsult your regular PwC contact should you have any questions or

    comments regarding this publication or the implementation of thenew accounting standards.

    Eddy RintisAssurance LeaderKAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC)

    15 October 2012

    Foreword

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    4/20

    2 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    Comparing International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)/International Accounting Standards (IAS) with IndonesianFinancial Accounting Standards (PSAK)

    Below are the key comparison between the Indonesian Financial Accounting Standards(PSAK or IFAS) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)/International Accounting Standards (IAS) required for annual reporting periods

    beginning on 1 January 2012.

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 1 First-time

    Adoption ofInternationalFinancialReportingStandards

    - No equivalent

    standard

    IFRS 1 will not be adopted

    as it has been considered orincluded in the transitionalprovision in the individualstandards/interpretations.

    IFRS 2 Share-basedPayment

    PSAK 53 Share-basedPayment

    PSAK 53 is consistent with IFRS2 in all signicant respects.

    IFRS 3 BusinessCombinations

    PSAK 22 BusinessCombinations

    Two standards in key principalsare the same, however there

    are several minor amendmentsbeing made in the IFRS 3

    which has not been absorbedby PSAK 22.

    There is a difference inmeasuring non-controllinginterests where IFRS 3 providesclearer requirements (onpresent ownership interests

    and entitle their holders toa proportionate share of theentitys net assets in the eventof liquidation) which reducesdiversity in the application.

    IFRS 3 also providesapplication guidance onall share-based paymenttransactions that are part

    of business combinations,including unreplaced and

    voluntarily replaced share-based payment awards.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    5/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 3

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 4 InsuranceContracts

    PSAK 62

    PSAK 28

    PSAK 36

    InsuranceContracts

    Accounting forLoss Insurance

    Accounting forLife Insurance

    PSAK 62 is adopted from IFRS4 except for the requirementin IFRS 4 to measure theinsurance liabilities on anundiscounted basis because

    this contradicts PSAK 28 andPSAK 36.

    The purpose of PSAK 28and 36 is to complement therequirement in PSAK 62. Thereare no standards in IFRS/IAS

    which are equivalent to PSAK28 and 36.

    IFRS 5 Non-currentAssets Heldfor Sale andDiscontinuedOperations

    PSAK 58 Non-currentAssets Heldfor Sale andDiscontinuedOperations

    PSAK 58 is consistent with IFRS5 in all signicant respects.

    IFRS 6 Exploration forand Evaluationof MineralResources

    PSAK 64

    PSAK 33

    Explorationand Evaluationof MineralResourcesMining

    StrippingActivities andEnvironmentalManagement inGeneral Mining

    PSAK 64 is consistent with IFRS6 in all signicant respects.

    PSAK 33 provides specicguidelines on the generalmining in relation tostripping and environmentalmanagement activities. Thereare no standards in IFRS/IAS

    which are equivalent to PSAK

    33 and thus this additionalprovision may lead to differentaccounting treatment.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    6/20

    4 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 7 FinancialInstruments:Disclosures

    PSAK 60 FinancialInstruments:Disclosures

    There are several amendmentsbeing made in the IFRS 7 whichhas not been absorbed by PSAK60. The main differences are asfollows:

    PSAK 60, under thecredit risk disclosurerequirements, still includesa provision to disclosethe carrying amount ofnancial assets that wouldotherwise be past due orimpaired whose terms havebeen renegotiated and a

    description of collateralheld by the entity assecurity and other creditenhancements, where asIFRS 7 has deleted thesepoints.

    IFRS 7 requires greaterdisclosure of transferrednancial assets in

    both categories of (a)transferred assets thatare not derecognisedin their entirety and(b) transferred assetsthat are derecognisedin their entirety. Thesecond category has moreextensive disclosuresrequirements.

    IFRS 8 OperatingSegments

    PSAK 5 OperatingSegments

    PSAK 5 is consistent with IFRS8 in all signicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    7/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 5

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 1 Presentationof FinancialStatements

    PSAK 1 Presentationof FinancialStatements

    PSAK 1 is consistent with IAS1 in all signicant respects,except for the following:

    PSAK 1 denes Indonesian

    Financial AccountingStandards (IFAS)as consisting of theStatements of Financial

    Accounting Standards,their interpretations andnancial reporting rulesissued by capital marketauthorities. IAS 1 does notinclude the latter.

    Unlike IAS 1, PSAK 1disallows an entity to usetitles for the nancialstatements other thanthose used in PSAK 1.PSAK 1 however allows theentity to use balance sheetsinstead of the statement ofnancial position.

    Under PSAK 1, wherecompliance with the PSAK

    would be so misleadingthat it would conict

    with the objectives of thenancial statements, anentity is not allowed todepart from the relevantstandards; however it

    may disclose the factthat: (a) the applicationof those standards wouldbe misleading and (b)alternative reportingbasis should be applied toachieve fair presentationof nancial statements.IAS 1, under similar

    circumstances, allowsfor departure from theprevailing standards.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    8/20

    6 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 2 Inventories PSAK 14 Inventories PSAK 14 is consistent with IAS2 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 7 Statement ofCash Flows

    PSAK 2 Statement ofCash Flows

    PSAK 2 is consistent with IAS 7in all signicant respects.

    IAS 8 AccountingPolicies,Changes in

    AccountingEstimates andErrors

    PSAK 25 AccountingPolicies,Changes in

    AccountingEstimates andErrors

    PSAK 25 is consistent with IAS8 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 10 Events afterthe ReportingPeriod

    PSAK 8 Events afterthe ReportingPeriod

    PSAK 8 is consistent with IAS10 in all signicant respects,except that IAS 10 requires

    disclosure in cases whereowners or other parties havethe power to amend nancialstatements after issue.PSAK does not require suchdisclosure.

    IAS 11 ConstructionContracts

    PSAK 34 ConstructionContracts

    PSAK 34 is consistent with IAS11 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 12 Income Taxes PSAK 46 Income Taxes IAS 12 contains an exception to

    the measurement of deferredtax assets or liabilities arisingon investment propertymeasured at fair value whichassumed that an investmentproperty is recovered entirelythrough sale.

    PSAK 46 regulates severalitems that are not covered byIAS 12, i.e. (a) nal income tax(no deferred tax applicable,recognition and presentationof the related nal income taxexpense and balance) and (b)specic rules with regard to taxassessment letters (mainly onthe recognition of additionaltax expenses/income arising

    from the tax examinationletters).

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    9/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 7

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 16 Property, Plantand Equipment

    PSAK 16

    ISAK 25

    Fixed Assets

    Land Rights

    PSAK 16 is consistent with IAS16 in all signicant respects.PSAK 16 provides referenceto ISAK 25 in relation to land

    rights.

    ISAK 25 still maintains thatland that is held under HGB,HGU and Hak Pakai rights isnot amortised unless there isan indication that the renewalor extension of the rights isnot probable or cannot be

    obtained. Costs to obtain thoserights for the rst time arecapitalized as xed assets butsubsequent costs to extend orrenew the rights are recognisedas intangible assets and thenamortised based on paragraph11 of ISAK 25.

    IAS 17 Leases PSAK 30 Leases PSAK 30 is consistent with IAS

    17 in all signicant respects.IAS 18 Revenue PSAK 23 Revenue PSAK 23 is consistent with IAS

    18 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 19 EmployeeBenets

    PSAK 24 EmployeeBenets

    PSAK 24 is consistent with IAS19 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 20 Accounting forGovernmentGrants andDisclosure ofGovernment

    Assistance

    PSAK 61 Accounting forGovernmentGrants andDisclosure ofGovernment

    Assistance

    PSAK 61 is consistent with IAS20 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 21 The Effectsof Changesin ForeignExchange Rates

    PSAK 10 The Effectsof Changesin ForeignExchange Rates

    PSAK 10 is consistent with IAS21 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 23 BorrowingCosts

    PSAK 26 BorrowingCosts

    PSAK 26 is consistent with IAS23 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 24 Related PartyDisclosures PSAK 7 Related PartyDisclosures PSAK 7 is consistent with IAS24 in all signicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    10/20

    8 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 26 Accountingand Reportingby RetirementBenet Plans

    PSAK 18 Accountingand Reportingby RetirementBenet Plans

    PSAK 18 is consistent with IAS26 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 27 Consolidatedand SeparateFinancialStatements

    PSAK 4 Consolidatedand SeparateFinancialStatements

    PSAK 4 is consistent with IAS27 in all signicant respects,except that:

    1. Unlike IAS 27, PSAK 4does not allow a parententity to present itsown separate nancial

    statements as standalonegeneral purpose nancialstatements. PSAK 4stipulates that the separatenancial statementshave to be presentedas supplementaryinformation to theconsolidated nancialstatements.

    2. PSAK 4 does notprovide an exemptionfor the parent entityfrom consolidating thenancial statements of itssubsidiaries. All parententities are required topresent the consolidatednancial statements.Under IAS 27, such anexemption exists providedcertain criteria are met.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    11/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 9

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 28 Investments inAssociates

    PSAK 15 Investments inAssociates

    PSAK 15 is consistent with IAS28 in all signicant respects,except that under IAS 28,an entity or an investor is

    exempted from applying theequity method of accountingfor its associates if they meetcertain criteria. In this case,the investor prepares separatenancial statements as theironly nancial statementsand records investments inassociates, either at cost or inaccordance with IAS 39.

    IAS 29 FinancialReporting inHyperination-ary Economies

    PSAK 63 FinancialReporting inHyperination-ary Economies

    PSAK 63 is consistent with IAS29 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 31 Interests inJoint Ventures

    PSAK 12 Interests inJoint Ventures

    PSAK 12 is consistent with IAS31 in all signicant respects.But while both PSAK 12 andIAS 31 allow either the equitymethod or the proportionate

    consolidation method, PSAK12 puts more emphasis on theequity method, whereas IAS 31recommends the proportionateconsolidation method.

    IAS 32 FinancialInstruments:Presentation

    PSAK 50 FinancialInstruments:Presentation

    PSAK 50 is consistent with IAS32 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 33 Earnings per

    Share

    PSAK 56 Earnings per

    Share

    PSAK 56 is consistent with IAS

    33 in all signicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    12/20

    10 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 34 InterimFinancialReporting

    PSAK 3 InterimFinancialReporting

    PSAK 3 is consistent with IAS34 in all signicant respects.

    However, under the prevailing

    capital market regulations,listed companies are requiredonly to report cumulative

    year-to-date information (andrelated comparatives) for theStatement of ComprehensiveIncome (SoCI) and are notrequired to present currentinterim period SoCI.

    IAS 36 Impairment of

    Assets

    PSAK 48 Impairment of

    Assets

    PSAK 48 is consistent with IAS

    36 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 37 Provisions,ContingentLiabilities andContingent

    Assets

    PSAK 57 Provisions,ContingentLiabilities andContingent

    Assets

    PSAK 57 is consistent with IAS37 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 38 IntangibleAssets

    PSAK 19 IntangibleAssets

    PSAK 19 is consistent with IAS38 in all signicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    13/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 11

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 39 FinancialInstruments:Recognitionand

    Measurement

    PSAK 55 FinancialInstruments:Recognitionand

    Measurement

    There are several amendmentsbeing made in the IAS 39

    which has not been absorbedby PSAK 55.

    PSAK 55 is consistent with IAS39 in all signicant respectsexcept for IAS 39 includesseveral amendments withregard to:

    the prohibition of thereclassication of a hybrid(combined) contract out

    of the fair value throughprot or loss categorywhen the entity is unableto separately measure anembedded derivative;

    further clarication onthe scope exemptionto forward contract forbusiness combination.

    IAS 40 InvestmentProperty

    PSAK 13 InvestmentProperty

    PSAK 13 is consistent with IAS40 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 41 Agriculture No equivalentstandard underPSAK.

    IAS 41 will be adopted by afterit is revised by the IASB. TheIAS 41 model currently is notconsidered to be compatible

    with the agriculturalenvironment in Indonesia.Unlike IAS 41 that requires the

    agriculture to be measured atfair value, the accounting foragriculture under PSAK is stillbased on historical costs.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    14/20

    12 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    Comparing Interpretation of IFRS (IFRIC and SIC) and IndonesianInterpretation of Financial Accounting Standards (ISAK)

    Below are the key comparison between the Indonesian Interpretation of FinancialAccounting Standards (ISAK) and the IFRIC Interpretation (IFRIC) required forannual reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2012.

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 1 Changes in ExistingDecommissioning,Restoration andSimilar Liabilities

    ISAK 9 Changes in ExistingDecommissioning,Restoration andSimilar Liabilities

    ISAK 9 is consistent withIFRIC 1 in all signicantrespects.

    IFRIC 2 Members Sharesin Co-operativeEntities and SimilarInstruments

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 2 is not adoptedsince cooperatives inIndonesia do not issueshares to its members.

    IFRIC 4 Determining

    whether anArrangementcontains a Lease

    ISAK 8 Determining

    whether anArrangementContains a Lease

    ISAK 8 is consistent with

    IFRIC 4 in all signicantrespects.

    IFRIC 5 Rights to Interestsarising fromDecommissioning,Restoration andEnvironmentalRehabilitationFunds

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 5 is not adopted.

    IFRIC 6 Liabilities arisingfrom Participatingin a Specic Market- Waste Electricaland ElectronicEquipment

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 6 is not adopted.

    IFRIC 7 Applying theRestatement

    Approach underIAS 29FinancialReporting inHyperinfationaryEconomies

    ISAK 19 Applying theRestatement

    Approach underPSAK 63:FinancialReporting inHyperinfationaryEconomies

    ISAK 19 is consistentwith IFRIC 7 in allsignicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    15/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 13

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 9 Reassessmentof EmbeddedDerivatives

    ISAK 26 Reassessmentof EmbeddedDerivatives

    ISAK 26 is consistentwith IFRIC 9 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 10 Interim Financial

    Reporting andImpairment

    ISAK 17 Interim Financial

    Reporting andImpairment

    ISAK 17 is consistent

    with IFRIC 10 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 12 Service ConcessionArrangements

    ISAK 16 Service ConcessionArrangements

    ISAK 16 is consistentwith IFRIC 12 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 13 Customer LoyaltyProgrammes

    ISAK 10 Customer LoyaltyProgrammes

    ISAK 10 is consistentwith IFRIC 13 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 14 IAS 19 - The Limiton a DenedBenet Asset,Minimum FundingRequirements andtheir Interaction

    ISAK 15 PSAK 24 - TheLimit on a DenedBenet Asset,Minimum FundingRequirements andtheir Interaction

    There are severalamendments beingmade in the IFRIC 14

    which has not been

    absorbed by ISAK 15.

    There are differencesin determining theeconomic benetavailable as a reduction

    in future contributionsin the condition ofno minimum fundingrequirement or witha minimum fundingrequirement.

    Under the IFRIC 14,any surplus arisingfrom voluntary pre-

    payment of minimumfunding contribution inrespect of future serviceshould be recognisedas an asset when thereis a minimum fundingrequirement.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    16/20

    14 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 15 Agreements for theConstruction ofReal Estate

    PSAK 44

    ISAK 21

    Accountingfor Real EstateDevelopment

    Agreements for theConstruction ofReal Estate

    There are differencesin the accounting forreal estate developmentbetween PSAK 44 and

    IFRIC 15.

    PSAK 44 regulatesspecic provisions

    with regard to revenuerecognition of differenttypes of real estatedevelopment, costcomponents, allowanceallocation and

    disclosures.

    IFRIC 15 however is abroader interpretationof the accounting forrevenue and associatedexpenses by entitiesthat undertake theconstruction of realestate directly or

    through subcontractors.IFRIC 15 addresses

    whether the agreementfalls within the scopeof IAS 11 (ConstructionContracts) or IAS 18(Revenue) and whenthe revenue fromthe construction ofreal estate should berecognised.

    ISAK 21 is consistentwith IFRIC 15 in allsignicant respects.However, the differenceremains as the effectivedate of ISAK 21 isdelayed awaiting thecompletion of ED IFRSon revenue.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    17/20

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2012 15

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 16 Hedges of a NetInvestment in aForeign Operation

    ISAK 13 Hedges of a NetInvestment in aForeign Operation

    ISAK 13 is consistentwith IFRIC 16 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 17 Distributions of

    Non-cash Assets toOwners

    ISAK 11 Distributions of

    Non-cash Assets toOwners

    ISAK 11 is consistent

    with IFRIC 17 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assetsfrom Customers

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 18 has not beenadopted.

    IFRIC 19 ExtinguishingFinancial Liabilities

    with EquityInstruments

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 19 has not beenadopted.

    SIC-7 Introduction of theEuro

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    SIC 7 is not adopted.

    SIC-10 GovernmentAssistance-NoSpecic Relation toOperating Activities

    ISAK 18 GovernmentAssistance-NoSpecic Relation toOperating Activities

    ISAK 18 is consistentwith SIC 10 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-12 Consolidation-

    Special PurposeEntities

    ISAK 7 Consolidation-

    Special PurposeEntities

    ISAK 7 is consistent with

    SIC 12 in all signicantrespects.

    SIC-13 Jointly ControlledEntities-Non-MonetaryContributions by

    Venturers

    ISAK 12 Jointly ControlledEntities-Non-MonetaryContributions by

    Venturers

    ISAK 12 is consistentwith SIC 13 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-15 Operating Leases-Incentives

    ISAK 23 Operating Leases-Incentives

    ISAK 23 is consistentwith SIC 15 in all

    signicant respects.SIC-25 Income Taxes-

    Changes in the TaxStatus of an Entityor its Shareholders

    ISAK 20 Income Taxes-Changes in the TaxStatus of an Entityor its Shareholders

    ISAK 20 is consistentwith SIC 25 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-27 Evaluating theSubstance ofTransactionsInvolving the Legal

    Form of a Lease

    ISAK 24 Evaluating theSubstance ofTransactionsInvolving the Legal

    Form of a Lease

    ISAK 24 is consistentwith SIC 27 in allsignicant respects.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    18/20

    16 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    SIC-29 Service ConcessionArrangements:Disclosures

    ISAK 22 Service ConcessionArrangements:Disclosures

    ISAK 22 is consistentwith SIC 29 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-31 Revenue-Barter

    TransactionsInvolving

    AdvertisingServices

    No equivalent

    interpretationunder PSAK.

    No equivalent

    interpretation underPSAK.

    SIC-32 Intangible Assets-Web Site Costs

    ISAK 14 Intangible Assets-Web Site Costs

    ISAK 14 is consistentwith SIC 32 in allsignicant respects.

    There are other specic PSAKs that have no equivalent standards under IFRS i.e.:

    PSAK 38: Akuntansi Restrukturisasi Entitas Sepengendali /Accounting forRestructuring Under Common Control Entities

    The objective of this standard is to specify the accounting for restructuring undercommon control entities which has not been covered by PSAK 22 BusinessCombinations.

    A restructuring transaction which occurred within under common control entities isconsidered to have no economic substance, despite any legal form transfer between the

    entities.

    PSAK 45: Pelaporan Keuangan Entitas Nirlaba /Financial Reporting for Non-Proft Organisations

    The objective of this standard is to specify the nancial reporting for non-prot

    organisations.

    PSAK 51: Akuntansi Kuasi-Reorganisasi / Accounting for Quasi Reorganisation

    This standard species the accounting for quasi reorganisation. This standard will bewithdrawn effectively starting 1 January 2013.

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    19/20

    Djohan Pinnarwan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Mair Hodge+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Marcel Irawan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    For professional accounting advice,please contact:

    Jumadi Anggana+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Jasmin Maranan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Ketty Tedja+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Ridy Sudarma+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Helen Cuizon+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Authors, contributors,and reviewers

  • 7/27/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2012.pdf

    20/20

    Plaza 89Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav. X-7 No.6Jakarta 12940 - INDONESIAP.O. Box 2473 JKP 10001Telp: +62 21 5212901

    Fax: +62 21 5290 5555/5290 5050

    2012 KAP Tanudiredja, Wibisana & Rekan. All rights reserved.PwC refers to the Indonesia member rm, and may sometimes refer tothe PwC network. Each member rm is a separate legal entity.Pl / t t f f th d t il