to~~aJY File: 18G D.B. 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ Oo 'fj I ~~INDOOR FIRING RANGE' REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT ETELSON AIR FORCE BASE I ~~~~ALASKA J ~~~~~FINAL NOVEMBER 1998 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. In affiliation with: Anderson Alaska, Inc. Philip Services Corporation Radian International, LLC I ~~~~~~~Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Alaska District Wilder Construction Company Total Environmental Restoration Contract
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
to~~aJY File: 18GD.B.
1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/If Oo 'fj
I ~~INDOOR FIRING RANGE'REMEDIAL ACTION
REPORT
ETELSON AIR FORCE BASEI ~~~~ALASKA
J ~~~~~FINAL
NOVEMBER 1998
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
In affiliation with:Anderson Alaska, Inc.Philip Services CorporationRadian International, LLCI ~~~~~~~Shannon & Wilson, Inc.
Alaska District Wilder Construction Company
Total Environmental Restoration Contract
I ~~INDOOR FIRING RANGE
REMEDIAL ACTION
REPORT
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASEALASKA
FINALNOVEMBER 1998
Prepared for: Prepared by:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.I ~ ~~~~~~~~P.O. Box 898 4300 B Street, Suite 600Anchorage. Alaska 99506-0898 Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Total Environmental Restoration ContractContract No. DACA 85-95-D-0018
ii ~~~~~~~~~~~Task Order No. 07
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7 ~~~~SECTION PAGE
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................... U
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................-
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1-1
1.1 PROJECTIDESCRIPTION............................................................... 1-1
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................. 1-3
1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................ 1-6
7 ~~~~~2.0 PRE-DEMOLITION SAMPLING.......................................................... 2-1
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM ................................................................ 2-1
2.2 SAMPLING RESULTS .................................................................. 2-4
3.0 REMOVAL ACTION ....................................................................... 3-1
3.1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION.......................................... 3-1
3.2 AIR MONITORING...................................................................... 3-1
3.3 RANGE DECONTAMINATION........................................................3-33.4 FIRING RANGE SAND REMOVAL................................................... 3-5
3.5 LEAD SHOT REMOVAL ............................................................... 3-8
3.6 FIRING RANGE DEMOLITION........................................................ 3-8
3.7 FIRING RANGE CONFIRMATION SAMPLING .................................... 3-8
3.8 PUNCHLIST WORK ITEMS........................................................... 3-114.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL............................................. 4-1
4.1 WASTE STAGING....................................................................... 4-1
4.2 FIRING RANGE SAND DISPOSITION ............................................... 4-2
4.3 STRIKE PLATE, ARMOUR PLATE, AND DUCT DISPOSITION ................. 4-3
4.4 FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE DISPOSITION.................................. 4-3
4.5 CONTAMINATED SAWDUST DISPOSITION ............................ 4-3
4.6 DISPOSITION OF FURNITURE, TARGET RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, ANDVENTILATION SYSTEM BLOWERS................................................. 4-4
5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT......................................................... 5-1
5.1 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY ............................................................ 5-1
5.2 DATA QUALITY SUMMARY ......................................................... 5-3
6.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................. 6-1
7.0 REFERENCES............................................................................... 7-1
I.EIELSON\OM307OI\NW~hina] Eielso Reportidoc AKT-107-05M307-122.0002FINAL11/23198
-I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
TABLES
Table 1-1 Project Cleanup Levels .............................................................. 1-6
Table 2-1 Pre-Demolition XRF Screening Results............................................ 2-3Table 2-2 Detected Pre-Demolition Analytical Laboratory Results.......................... 2-5
Table 2-3 Firing Range Sand Characterization Sampling Results............................ 2-6Table 3-1 Air Monitoring Results .............................................................. 3-2Table 3-2 Confirmation Soil Sample Results.................................................. 3-71
Table 3-3 Firing Range Wipe Confirmation Sample Results................................. 3-9
Table 3-4 Liner Characterization Results ..................................................... 3-10
Table 4-1 Summary of Waste Disposition ..................................................... 4-1
FIGURES1
Figure 1-1 Location Map, Eielson AFB, Alaska ............................................... 1-21
Figure 1-2 Building 2204, Location Detail ..................................................... 1-4
Figure 1-3 Site Layout............................................................................ 1-s
Figure 2-1 Pre-Demolition Sampling Locations................................................ 2-2
Figure 3-1 Final Configuration of Firing Range................................................ 3-4
Figure 3-2 Soil and Wipe Confirmation Sample Locations.................................... 3-6
APPENDICES
Appendix A Photographs
Appendix B Analytical Data and Air Monitoring Results
Appendix C Firing Range Sand Disposition DocumentationAppendix D Waste Management Documentation
Appendix E Response to Comments
IAEIELSONA05M3O1Ol\WP\inal Eielson ReportI doc AKT-J07.05M307-322-0002FINAL11/24/98
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial HygienistsADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
AFB Air Force Base
AOC area of concern
ASTM American Society of Testing and MaterialsBESCORP Brice Environmental Services Corporation
BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes
* G~~AS Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.CIH certified industrial hygienist
Coc chain-of-custody
CY cubic yardDQO data quality objectives
DRMO Defense Marketing and Reutilization Office*Z ~~~EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FNSB Fairbanks North Star Borough
GC/MS gas chromatography/mass spectroscopyHDPE high density polyethylene
HEPA high efficiency particulate air
HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Jacobs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.r
LQAPP Laboratory Quality Assurance Project Planmicrogram per square foot
ni/rn3 microgram per cubic metermglkg milligrams per kilogram
mg/L nmilligranms per liter
Ms matrix spike
MSD matrix spike duplicate
NA not analyzed forND non detected
OSHA U.S. Occupational Health and Safety AdministrationPARCC precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability
PCB polychlorinated biphenylPEL permissible exposure limit
I:\EIELSON\05M30701\WPThinI Eielso Reportido HiAKT-307-05M307-J22-0002FINALI 1,23/98
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS(continued)
PPE personal protective equipment
ppm parts per million
QA quality assuranceIQAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan I
QC quality control
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RRF relative response factors
RSD relative standard deviation
SAP Addendum Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum
sops standard operating procedures
SSAP Standard Sampling and Analysis Plan
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TERC Total Environmental Restoration Contract
354 6h CES 354tb Civil Engineering Squadron
TLV threshold limit value
TOC total organic carbon
TSDF treatment, storage, and disposal facility
USAED U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska
USAF U.S. Air Force
UXO unexploded ordnance
XRF X-ray fluorescence
l:\EfiELSON\OSM3O70I\W\RFinal TEd=o RePent dociv AKT-107-05M307-122-0002FINAL11t23SS9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska (USAED) contracted with Jacobs Engineering Group
Inc. (Jacobs) through the Total Environmental Restoration Contract (TERC) to perform a
demolition of an indoor firing range on Eielson Air Force Base (AFB) near Fairbanks, Alaska.
The demolition was performed in accordance with the work plan and associated regulatory
guidan ce regarding shipping and disposal of the firing range sands. The project consisted of
pre-demolition characterization of building surfaces and materials and removing and
disposing or recycling of:
* Approximately 103 tons of firing range sands and 600 pounds of lead bullet fragments;
* Approximately 300 pounds of light ballast;
* Approximately 23,000 pounds of building material debris, including furniture andconcrete;
* Approximately 400 pounds of a target retrieval system and ventilation system blowers;
* One 5-gallon drum of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sawdust; and* Approximately 2 tons of steel backstop, armor plating and ducting.
Analytical results of confirmation samples collected following demolition of the indoor firing
range were compared to the established cleanup levels. Analytical results indicated that the
majority of the samples met the criteria for clean closure, while several exceeded the
established criteria. Although exceeding the established cleanup level of 1 O0pg/1ft, the resultsare well below levels that would pose a health risk to humans in an industrial environment
such as the space of the former firing range. Therefore, no further action is recommended to
remediate the indoor firing range.
Remediation of the firing range was curtailed in late-October. 1997 due to inclement weather
conditions. Duhfng the project walk-through conducted at the end of the 1997 field seasonwith USA.ED, U.S. Air Force (USAF), Jacobs, and Brice Environmental Services Corporation
(BESCORP) personnel, a punch list was developed that delineated the work items to be
IAEIELSON\05M3070l\WP\Firna Eidlson Rcpofl.doc ES- 1 AKT-307-05M307-i22.0002Final 11/98
completed when weather conditions permitted in the spring of 1998. The work remaining
included:
* Re-seeding disturbed areas outside of the range;
* Filling holes-*left in the walls of the basement following the firing range demolition; and -
* Painting the building exterior.
On 15 June 1998, BESCORP personnel remobilized to Building 2204 to perform the punch
list items described above. Following completion of this work, USAED and USAF
representatives were satisfied with the condition of the former firing range and agreed that no
fuirther action was required to complete the removal action.
l:\EIELSONMO5M3070I\WPTinal Etelson Repofltidoc ES52 AKT-307-05M307-122-0002Final 11/98
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
USAED, on behalf of its USAF customer, directed Jacobs to perform a demolition at a former
small-arms firing range located in the basement of Building 2204 at Eielson AFB. The
demolition was performed 16-3 1 October 1997 under Task Order 07 of the TERC. The firing
range was located in the basement of Building 2204 and was designated as Area of Concern
(AOC) 32.
Eielson AFB is located on the Richardson Highway near the town of North Pole, Alaska, and
is about 20 miles southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska (Figure 1 -1).
Prior to conducting the firing range demolition, characterization of the basement interior
surfaces and construction materials to be removed was performed to determine the best
approach to conducting the demolition and disposal options for the various waste streams.
The demolition involved cleaning surfaces exposed to lead dust and removing and disposing
of: firing range sands and appurtenances; protective armor; sound proofing that shielded the
inside surfaces of the firing range; wall, ceiling, and floor coverings; selected ducts and utility
services; and miscellaneous pieces of frnmiture.
The indoor firing range sands contained bullet fragments, lead particles, and lead-coated sand
and dust at concentrations exceeding non-regulated reuse or disposal. Samples were first
collected and tested by the 354 Civil Engineering Squadron (354"'CES) at Eielson AFB.
Subsequent samples were collected by Jacobs' subcontractor, BESCORP, in support of a
bench-scale treatability test and an engineering evaluation of alternatives for beneficial reuse
or disposal of the range sands. These studies were performed during Spring 1997 and were
the precursors of this demolition action. The findings and conclusions of the treatability study
and engineering evaluation were the basis of the selected cleanup strategy and approaches to
the demolition presented in this final report.
L.E1ELSON\05M30701\WPF~inal Eiclson Repofll.doc 1 AKT-307-05MI307-122-0002Final 11/98
co
CL~~~~~~~~-*1 zi~~~~~~~~~
4-i<~~~~<
z L)4 VI0 mz L
w R)~ N ' aLii.
m~~~~~~~~~C-) LI U
IZ~~~~~~~~~~
0 ~~~~.
* ~~~Figure 1-2 identifies the location of Building 2204 relative to Eielson AFB and identifies the
location of the small-arms firing range within Building 2204. The indoor range was located in
the south end of the basement. The firing range and project site layout is presented in
Figure 1-3.
T ~~~The demolition was conducted in accordance with the work plan and consisted of the
following activities:
*Cleaning surfaces exposed to lead dust;
*Removal and disposal of firing range sand and an area of lead bullet fragments;
*Removal of firing range appurtenances, protective armor and sound proofing, selectedducts and utility services, and miscellaneous pieces of furniture;
*Characterization and disposal of a drum of contaminated sawdust;* Re-seeding disturbed areas outside the range and patching holes left in the building walls
caused by the demolition of the range; and
L .~~~ Collecting confirmation soil and wipe samples.
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The indoor small-arms firing range is believed to have been constructed concurrently with the
remainder of Building 2204. Bullet fragments indicate that 22-caliber and 45-caliber
ammunition were frequently used. Signs posted near the entrance indicate that shotguns could
also have been used in the range; however, lead shot was not observed in the firing range
sands. The firing range was inactive at the time of the demolition and had not been used for
target practice since the mid- to late-1980s. Access to the range was restricted by the354ti SPS/CC (Security Police Squadron), who kept small arms and ammnunition in the vault
adjacent to the firing range.
L B~~~I:EIE1SONMO5M3070WI\W\inuj Etelson Rejportll~ 1-3 AKT-J07-05M307.122.0002Final I1/98
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~NORTH
~23 493 2259
2350 fl ~~~~~~~~~EAST LOOP
2256 2260 2262 2264
GE MAINT. SHOPS
CNTRALAV
F - ~~~ATHLETIC FIELDS -I20
GAS I ~~~~~~DINING HALL
2202~~20
1125~~~~~~~~1
STORAGE 12 1 1- 12 _ _ _ _
BUILDING 2204 LOCATION DETAILEIELSON AFB, ALASKA
LATERAL CLEARANCE LINE
TASK MG4R: JACAD FILE NO: FIGURE $0:0 500 1000 2000 0. BURGESS FI G2-_2 I
I --I DRAWN BY: PROJ. NO:DAESCALE IN FEET aS.B. K. 105M30701. JULY 98
1-4
00t
C6 g
< n*
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 ,& -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0L
* * . m~~~~~- D C
~~ W Li
.4 .4 .4 .4 0 4~ ~ QC
.4 .4 .4 I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ a
4.4.4.4 c-n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~v
r 4.4--- --- --- --
FE~~~~~~~~~~U
EE.4. L~
.4 4 , I 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r* I~~~~~
* .4 .4 .4 ~ ~ ~ ~
1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The objective of the demolition was to safely demolish and decontaminate. the basement of
Building 2204 so the building could be re-utilized for storage, offices, Or other purposes. The
cleanup levels associated with this obj ective are presented in Table I1-1I.1
Tablel1-1 Project Cleanup Levels
Item fCleanup Level
Materials removed from the range for reuse or 5 milligram per liter (mg/L) toxicity characteristicdisposal leaching procedure (TCLP) lead
Surfaces and materials remaining in the range 1 00 micrograms pier square toot (pgift2)1
Disposal and treatment of firing range sand and 400 milligram/lkilogranm (mng/kg) total lead
Notfaes: of soil remaining in placeI
'The cleanup level is the most conservative of the three recommended by the U.S. Department of Urban Housing andDevelopment (HUD). The results of the confirmation wipe sampling indicated levels greater than 100 (pg/ft2) to be presentfollowing demolition of the range. Based upon the plan for meuse of the space, the level of lead contamination remaining, andthe threat posed to human health, the cleanup level accepted at the completion of the demolition was raised to a level mareIappropriate for an industrial selling. See Section 3.7 for further details on the results of the confirmation sampling.
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram
I:TEIESON\05M30101\WPi~insl Ed= elocpol.doc 1-6 AKT-107-05M307-J22-0002.Final 11195
2.0 PRE-DEMOLITION SAMPLING
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAML
To demonstrate. that the majority of the demolished construction materials could be disposed of
at the Fairbanks North Star Borough (FNSB) landfill as non-hazardous wastes, pre-demolition
sampling and analysis were performed on 14-15 and 17 July 1997. XRF screening was
performed on the interior surfaces of the range using a Spectrace 9000 XRF analyzer
- manufactured by TN Technologies of Round Rock, Texas. XRF screening was performed both£ before and after dry vacuuming and/or wet wiping at locations identified for the collection of
composite TCLP samples. The measure of residual lead compared to the pre-decontaminatedI.~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L ~~surface lead measurement was used to provide guidance for selecting the appropniate
decontamination technique. Following XRF screening and surface decontamination, 34 bulk
samples were collected of the various groups of construction materials and sent to ColumbiaV ~~Analytical Services (CAS) in Anchorage, Alaska, for analysis. The bulk samples were reduced
to seven composite samples and analyzed for toxic characterization leaching procedure (TCLP)
B ~~lead analysis using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods SW131 1/6010A.
Figure 2-1 shows the location of all the areas screened for surface lead by XRF. Table 2-1
presents the screening location, sample identification numbers, XRF screening results,
pre-composite TCLP sample numbers, and the composite sample numbers into which each
pre-composite sample was reduced. The chain of custody (CoC) forms and the data analytical
g ~~reports associated with these samples are presented in Appendix B.
I:\IELSOM05M307OI\WThinal Eidlson Reportl.doc 2-1 A.KT-107-05M307-J22.0002Final 11198
V1z
0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~z
* Z u ~~~~~~ Zw2, o o-Ck9~
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LAJ w
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0
m u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~
- C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<~C
C,~~~~~~~~~~~C
z ~ z
-I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Y
40 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~.2
Table 2-1 Pro-Demolition XRF Screening Results
Post- LaboratoryXRF Grab Sample Decontamination Composite
Screening Number for TCLP XRF Results SampleMaterial Type Location Composting (mg/cm,) Number
Floor Tiles Room 1 1 JE97EIE100CM 0.0680Floor Tiles Room 2 2 JE97EIE101CM 0.0720Floor Tiles Room 3 3 JE97EIE102CM 0.0500Floor Tiles Room 4 4 JE97EIE103CM 0.0650Floor Tiles Range (N) 5 JE97EIE104CM 0.0850 2Floor Tiles Range (S) 6 JE97EIE105CM 0.0760Floor Tiles Range (C) 7 JE97EIE106CM 0.0590Acoustical Ceiling Tiles 8 JE97EIE107CM 0.0020 3Acoustical Wall Tiles Room 1 9 JE97EIE108CM 0.0001Acoustical Wall Tiles Room 2 1 0 JE97EIE109CM 0.0003Acoustical Wall Tiles Room 3 1 1 JE97EIE110CM 0.0100Acoustical Ceiling Tiles 1 2 JE97EIE111CM 0.06704Acoustical Wall Tiles 1 3 JE97EIE112CM 0.0060Acoustical Wail Tiles 1 4 JE97EIE113CM 0.0220Acoustical Wall Tiles 1 5 JE97EIE114CM 0.0150Sheetrock on Walls Room 2 1 6 JES7EIE11SCM 0.0027 5Sheetrock on Walls Room 3 1 7 JE97EIE116CM 0.0028Sheetrock on Walls Room 4 1 8 JE97EIE117CM 0.0120Plywood on Ceiling Room 3 1 9 JE97EIE118CM -0.0005Lumber on Walls Room 2 20 JE97EIE120CM -0.0017Lumber on Walls Room 3 21 JE97EIE121CM 0.0011Lumber on Walls Room 4 22 JE97EIE122CM -0.0020Plywood Walls Range (N) 23 JE97EIE123CM 0.00406Plywood Walls Range (S) 24 JE97EIE124CM 0.0170Boardwalk Plywood 25 JE97EIE125CM 0.1260Boardwalk Plywood 26 JE97EIE126CM 0.1160Boardwalk Plywood 27 JE97EIE127CM 0.1260Lumber in Floor/Trap (W) 28 JE97EIE128CM 0.1320Lumber in Floor/Trap (E) 29 JE97EIE129CM 0.4660Plywood in Sound Baffle 30 JE97EIE130CM 0.0020Floor Tiles Room 1 1 JE97EIE132CM 0.0680 7
I - ~~~Floor Tiles Room 2 2 JE97EIE133CM 0.0720Floor Tiles Room 3 3 *JE97EIE134CM 0.0500Floor Tiles Room 4 4 JE97EIE135CM 0.0650
Notes:Composite sample No. r is a duplicate of composite sample No. 1Sample matrix code CM refers to construction material
E eastMg/CM 2 milligrams per square cubic meterN northS southW west
IAEIELSON05M30701\W~injl Ejelsn Reportl~do 2-3 AKCT-107-05M307-J22.0002Final 1 1/98
The sampling program also included collection of two grab samples from a 5-gallon
polyethylene drum containing sawdust contaminated with an unknown compound. Samples of
the sawdust were analyzed for volatile organics compound by EPA Method 8260B and for eight
TCLP Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals by EPA Methods
SWl311l/6010/7000.
In addition, light fixtures within the range were visually examined for manufacture date or any
other indications that the fluorescent ballasts contained polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)
compounds.
2.2 SAMPLING RESULTS
The results of the XRF screening indicated that sufficient lead dust was present in the basement
such that the decontamination of the range (by dry vacuuming and/or wet wiping) and removal of
the firing range sands should be performed in Level C personal protective equipment (PPE). In
addition, these activities should be accompanied by air monitoring for lead dust. Once these
activities were complete, work could resume in Level D PPE. A discussion of the air monitoring
activities conducted during the demolition is presented in Section 3.2.
Composite TCLP analyses were reported by CAS as composite numbers (No.) 1 through 7.
Table 2-1 shows the grouping of the individual pre-composite samples, and Table 2-2 presents
the results of the TCLP analysis on the composite samples and the results of the RCRA metals
and volatile organic compound (VOC) analyses on the sawdust samples.
IAEILSOMOIM3O70I\WF\inal Edeson Report! .doc 2-4 AKT-307-05M307-i22-0002Final 11/98
Table 2-2 Detected Pre-Demolition Analytical Laboratory Results
Composite/ TCLP RCRAGrab Sample Lead Metals 3
Material Type Number (mgIL) (mg/kg) Volatile Organics3 (mglkg)
Floor Tiles 1 0.8 NA NAFloor Tiles 2 2.0 NA NAFloor/Ceiling Tiles 3 0.04J NA NACeiling/Wall Tiles 4 0.5 NA NASheetrock/Lumber 5 0.06J NA NAPlywood/Lumber 6 2.8 NA NAFloor Tiles 7 0.8 NA NADrum Contents JE97EIE131US1 .2 ND 0.059J - Ba NA
_______ _____ _ ______ 0.04J - Se
Drum Contents JE97EIE136US NA NA 2J Trichlorofluoromethane12J Methylene chloride2J Benzene4J8 Toluene100 1 .3,5-Trichloropropane1 0J tert-Butylbenzne160 1 ,2,4-Trimethlybenzene.9J 4-isapropyltoluene
__ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ __I_ _ 110 Naphthialene
Notes:ISample matrix code US refers to Unknown Solid.
2 Drum contents sampled once for TCLP metals and once for volatile organics; therefore two sample numbers were used.Complete analytical data set is presented in Appendix B that includes non-detected results and detection limits.
NA Not AnalyzedB Analyte present in the blank and sampleBa Barium.1 Estimated valueND Not DetectedSe - Selenium
p ~~~mgfkg milligrams per kilogram
The results of the composite samples indicated that the construction materials to be removed
from the range during the demolition would not be classified as a hazardous waste and could be
disposed of at the FNSB landfill. The results of the sawdust analyses indicated that volatile
organic contamination was present at levels dictating disposal as a hazardous waste through the
Eielson AFB Hazardous Material Section and Defense Reutilization and Marketing Organization
* ~(DRMO).
IAEIELSON\05M30701\WP\ThaJ Eileson Reponl~doc 2-5 AKT-IO7-05M307-122-0002Final 11)98
Manufacture dates were not evident on the light fixtures present in the basement. Because no
indication could be found that the fluorescent light fixtures were "PCB free", they were treated as
PCB-containing waste and managed as described in Section 4.4.
During August and September 1997, samples of the firing range sand were collected to aid in the
determination of the suitability of this material for recycling and/or treatment through a lead
smelter. These samples were sent to CAS and analyzed for iron, total organic carbon, and silica
content prior to mobilization to the site for the removal action. The results were evaluated by the
Exide Smelter at Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to determine the acceptability of the Bielson AFB
firing range sands to be processed through their smelter. Table 2-3 presents the results of the
sand characterization sampling. Appendix B contains the CoC forms and the analytical data
sheets associated with these samples.
Table 2-3 Firing Range Sand Characterization Sampling Results
Total Organic BiologicalIron Carbon Silica Oxygen Percent
Content (ASTM Content Demand MoistureSample Number (SW6BOICA) 41129482M) (SW 6010A) (405.1IM) (160.3M)
8E97EIE020S0 1.8 % NA 78% NA NA
BE97EIE021SO NA NA 76% NA NA
BE97E1E022S0 NA 0.12% NA ND 0.1%
Notes:ASTM American Society of Testing and MaterialsNA not applicableND non-detect
IAkEIELSON\05M3070l\`W~hina i elison Rkeponl~dim 2-6 AKT-107-05M307-J22-0002Final 11i98
3.0 REMOVAL ACTION
3.1 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION
The majority of the equipment and supplies required to perform the removal action were
mobilized to Building 2204 from Fairbanks,.Alaska, along existing highways. An exclusion
zone was established on the south side of Building 2204 in east end of the parking lot, as
shown in Figure 1-3. The exclusion zone contained a waste staging area lined with a high
density polyethylene (HDPE) liner for the materials and sand removed from the range.
Adjacent to the exclusion zone a site trailer and two dumpsters were set up. The power to the
basement of Building 2204 was disconnected and temporary electricity was established to
provide power for the site trailer, temporary lighting and equipment to be used within the
firing range.
* ~~~Prior to mobilizing to the site and conducting the demolition, several permits were required by
Eielson AFB. The permits included:
* Gate passes for vehicles and individuals;
* A CONRAS permit for bringing radioactive materials (X-ray fluorescence [XRLF]) onsite;
* A cutting, welding, and brazing permit to perform plasma arc cutting of the armor platingand other metal surfaces;
* A permit to set up temporary power for the site trailer and field operations;
e A digging permit to remove the sand from the basement; and
* A work clearance request.
In addition, a letter of acceptance from the FNSB landfill was obtained regarding the
non-contaminated building debris designated for disposal at the landfill.
3.2 AIR MONITORING
Six episodes of air monitoring were conducted during the dry vacuuming of the range and
removal of the firing range sands to ensure the breathing atmosphere was not hazardous to
workers and that the permissible exposure limits (PEL) for lead dust were not exceeded.
IAEffLOMMO51M3070IWThinal Eielson Repofti doe 3-1 AKT-307-05M307-i22-0002Final 11d98
Samples were collected and sent to the R J Lee Group in Anchorage Alaska, for analysis on a
24-hour turnaround basis. Table 3-1 presents the results of the air monitoring. Appendix B,
Analytical Data and Air Monitoring Results, contains the data sheets associated with the air
monitoring samples.
Table 3-1 Air Monitoring Results
Sampling Sample I ResultEpisode Number Sample Location j (pglm3)
1 001 Personnel-dust vacuuming 6.171 002 Room 5 Center 9.951 003 Personnel-dust vacuuming 9.301 004 Room 5 Center 4.232 005 Personnel--sand removal 52.02 006 Personnel-sand bagging <3.02 007 Room 5 Center 29.92 008 i'1 Floor Stairwell <3.0
2 009 SE Exclusion Zone <3.03 010 1 1 Floor Stairwell <3.03 011 SE Exclusion Zone <3.04 012 1" Floor Stairwell 26.74 013 SE Exclusion Zone <3.05 014 1" Floor Stairwell 36.45 015 SE Exclusion Zone <3.06 016 W Exclusion Zone <3.0
Notes:SE southeastW Westpg/rn3 microgramns per cubic meter
Monitoring stations were set up at five points during the sand removal action to monitor for
airborne lead dust. The air monitoring locations consisted of:
* Two personnel monitors;
* One station downwind of the vacuum truck;
a One station in the stairwell on the first floor directly above the basement; and
* One station setup in the opening of a super sacks while being filled with firing range sand.
Results of the air monitoring activities were reviewed by a Jacobs certified industrial
hygienist~ (CIH) to verify that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
I:ElELON\O5M30701\WRFinu1 Eielson Reporti dcc 3-2 AJKT-J07-05M307-J22-0002Final 11J98
PELs and the American Conference of Governmental. Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
threshold limit value (TLV) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/rn3) of measured air was
not exceeded and were found to pass the regulatory criteria. One personnel sample collected
during the removal of the sands was found to exceed the PEL for lead dust. As shown in
Table 3-1, Sample No. 005 had a result of 52 pg/rn3 . This result verified the need for workers
to wear respiratory protection during the removal of the firing range sands. As a precaution,
all personnel working in the range during the sand removal action were equipped with
- ~~~half-face respirators. The sand removal activity is discussed in more detail in Section 3.5.
- ~3.3 RANGE DECONTAMINATION
Prior to removal of the firing range sands or any of the construction materials located in the
basement of Building 2204, the range was decontaminated by removal of the surface lead
dust. The surface of the walls, ceilings, floors, ducting, furniture, and other objects were
£ ~~~cleaned with portable dry vacuums equipped with high efficiency particulate air (H[EPA)
* ~~~filters. The work was performed in modified Level C PPE due to the unknown levels of lead
dust that may have become airborne during this activity. To ensure that worker safety was not
-' ~~compromised, air monitoring was also conducted in the range during this activity. A
discussion of the air monitoring activities is presented in Section 3.2.
L ~~~Following dry vacuuming of the range, removal of the wall and ceiling tiles was conducted.
After each layer of building materials was removed from the walls and ceiling, dry vacuuming
was again performed to remove dust that may have migrated beneath the wall and floor
coverings.
The dividing and temporary walls in Rooms 1 through 4 as shown in Figure 1-3 were
J ~~~decontaminated~and removed during this activity. Figure 3-1 presents the final configuration
of the firing range following the completion of the demolition. The materials removed during
this activity were containerized and managed as described in Section 4 of this report.
t I:\~~EIELSON\05M30701\WP\inal Ejidson Repotl~doc 3-3 AKT-107-05M307-122-0002Final 11/98
z a,<
6
z < 0 ot
U-
IL~~~~~~ 0z < z I,,z m7
o <
I- o
0 '
z iZ 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '0 )
Li..~ ~ ~ L.Z y___ IC uz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-C
LO ~ ~ F
z~
7' ~3.4 FIRING RANGE SAND REMOVAL
* ~~~The firing range sands were removed using a super sucker cyclone vacuum truck equipped
with a HEPA filter system. The vacuum truck was set up in the exclusion zone on the south
side of Building 2204. The sands were removed using a 1 00-foot hose run through anopening in the basement wall left by the removal of the ventilation system blowers. The sand
was packaged into one ton super sacks, weighed, and placed on wood pallets in the wastestaging area. Each super sack was marked with a unique sack number, the date, and the
weight.
Characterization of the sand for disposal and/or recycling purposes was performed during theC'
bench-scale treatability study performed during late-1996. The results of the study are
L ~~~presented in the Treatability Study Report, dated May 1997. Management and disposition of~~~ ~the sands is presented in Section 4.2.
The sand removal activity was conducted in modified Level C PPE and was accompanied by
air monitoring activities as described in Section 3.2.
Following the completion of the sand removal activity, a total of six confirmation samples
were collected from the firing range floor and bullet trap area excavations to ensure that lead
contamination exceeding the 400 mg/kg action level had been removed. The samples werecomposited from a total of four locations in the bottom of the excavations and sent to CAS fortotal lead analysis, as shown in Figure 3-2. Table 3-2 presents the results of the soil
confirmation sampling. The CoG forms and analytical data sheets associated with these
- ~~~samples are presented in Appendix B. The sample results indicated that the cleanup, levels
had been achieved and that no further excavation was necessary.
L\EIELSONMO5M3O7Ol\P*Final Eicison Rcponl .doc 3-5 kKT-J07-05M307-122.0002Final 11198
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0cr z~~z~~~~~~~~~~
Z uJ co r,
0~~
'Li
* Z~~~~~~~~~ 2~~
2 r~~~~~~~~~~~~V
f7~~~~~~~~~~ls
0~~~~~~
0
0~~~~~
Table 3-2 Confirmation Soil Sample Results
Sample Number Total Lead Results (SW 7420)
JE97EIE137SO 1 10 mg/kg
JE97EIE138S0 50 mg/kg1.~~~~~~~~~~J9EE3S 2 gk
JE97EIE140SO 220 mg/kg
JE97EIE141SO 30mgk
JE97EIE142SO ND
L Notes:mg/kg milligrams per kilogramND non-detect
At the direction of USALF representatives, the excavations left by removal of the firing range
- ~~~sands were backfilled with clean fill and compacted. Approximately 115 cubic yards of fill
material were obtained from the Bear Lake Quarry at Eielson AFB and hauled to the project
site. A Bobcat loader equipped with a muffler to minimize exhaust emissions was used to
place the fill inside the range through the opening left in the east end of the range. A
gasoline-fired compactor was used to compact and level the fill material. The final grade of
r ~~~the basement floor was established by line of sight.
During the removal of the firing range sands, a broken sewer line was uncovered. At the
direction of USAF representatives, the line was not covered with fill so that access could be
maintained for repairs. The fill material required to cover the line was left piled adjacent to
the hole.
P ~~~Air monitoring was conducted during the activity to ensure that a dangerous atmosphere was
not created by use of the compactor. Because the work was performed in a cyclic manner,
alternating the use of the Bobcat and compactor, ample time was provided for air changes in
the basement following use of the compactor. The alternation of the equipment resulted in
achieving the level of carbon dioxide below the PEL of 35 parts per million (ppm).
I \ETELSON\05M30701\WPhFinal Eielsorn Reportl~doc 3-7 AKT-JO1.05M307-J22.0002Final I1/98
3.5 LEAD SHOT REMOVAL
During the removal of the firing range sands, an area of metallic lead contamination
consisting of lead bullet fragments was discovered on the west side of Building 2204, as
shown in Figure 3-2. Prior to removal of the lead fragments, Eielson AFB unexploded
ordinance (UXO) personnel inspected the area and determined that no undischarged. bullets
remained and that the lead could safely be removed. At the direction of USAGE and USAF
representatives, the vacuum truck and rakes were used to remove approximately 590 pounds
of lead bullet fragments. The lead was placed into super sacks and taken to the waste staging
area along with the super sacks of firing range sand. Further discussion of the disposition of
the metallic lead is presented in Section 4.2.
3.6 FIRING RANGE DEMOLITION
Following removal of the firing range sands, the building construction materials in the range
were dry vacuumed as necessary to remove dust generated by the sand removal activity and
removed. These materials consisted of lighting fixtures; wall, floor, and ceiling tiles;
sheetrock; lumber; plywood; ventilation system ducting; and armor plating. The materials
were segregated for disposal depending upon composition. Waste segregating and disposition
activities are presented in Section 4.0.
At the~ completion of the firing range removal action, the heating system blowers were
reconnected to the building electrical circuits to supply heat to the basemeht so that the water
and sewer lines would not freeze.
3.7 FIRING RANGE CONFIRMATION SAMEPLING
Following completion of the decontamination of the firing range and removal of the firing
range sand, construction materials, furniture, and other miscellaneous materials, 27 wipe
confirmation samples were collected in accordance with the work plan. Figure 3-2 shows the
confirmation sample locations, and Table 3-3 presents the results of the confirmation
sampling. Table 3-4 presents the results of the characterization sampling performed on the
I:\EIESON\05M30701\VW~inaI Eielsot Reportldo 3-8 AKT-JO7-05M307-J22-0002Final I 1/98
liner in the waste staging area. Appendix B presents the CoG forms and the analytical data
r ~~~sheets associated with these samples.
Table 3-3 Firing Range Wipe Confirmation Sample Results
Sample ResultsSample Number Sample Location SW 7420 (pg/wlpe)
JE97EIE143SW Field Blank NDJE97EIE144SW Room #1 Floor. 100JE97EIE145SW Room #2 Floor 40JE97EIE146SW Doorway Floor 70JE97EIE147SW . Doorway Floor 50JE97EIE148SW Vault Doorway Floor 50JE97EIE149SW Main Entryway Floor soJE97EIE150SW Duplicate of 149 170JE97EIE151SW Residence Hall Floor Outside Range A-ccess Doo-r 70JE97EIE152SW Room #1 West Wall INDJE97EIE153SW Room #2 West Wall 20JE97EIE154SW Room #3 West Wall 60JE97EIE1 55SW Room #4 West Wall 30JE97EIE1 56SW Room #5 West Wall 340JE97EIE157SW Vault North Wall NDJE97EIE158SW Range East Wall (South of Access Door) 170JE97EIE159SW West Wall of Main Entrance NDJE97EIE160SW Duplicate of 159 NDJE97EIE161SW Firing Range North Wall 140JE97EIE162SW Firing Range South Wall 20JE97EIE163SW Column #4 North Side 40JE97EIE164SW Column #5 South Side 30JE97EIE165SW Column #6 West Side 220JE97EIE166SW Duplicate of 165 120JE97EIE167SW Ceiling Near Column #2 80JE97EIE168SW Ceiling Near Column #5 NDJE97EIE169SW East Side of Metal Ducting in Room 4 220
Notes:
ND Non Deterp
IAEIELSON\05M307O1WfFIinal Flelson Repoti .doc 3-9 AKT-J07-05M307-322.ooozFinal I1INS
Table 3-4 Liner Characterization Results
Sample ResultsSample Number Sample Location SW 6010OA (mgIL)
JE97EIE17OLN ~ ~Liner in Waste Staging Area IND Cl
_ ___ ___JE97EIE171LN Liner in Waste Staging Area O.05J Ci
Notes:
ND non-detect2J value is estimatedcl less than the required 100 gram sample was collectedpg/wipe microgram per wipe
In the statement of work and during preparation of the work plan, the cleanup level for
surfaces to be left in place following the demolition was identified to be
1 00 micrograms/square foot (pg/fl') based on HU D guidelines for lead removal actions. This
conservative action level was chosen because the intended reuse of the firing range was
unknown at the start of the project and when the work plan was being drafted. Since that
time, USAF has decided that the range will be reused as an indoor archery range. Because
this decision represents a non-residential use, representatives of Eielson AFB, ADEC, and
EPA thought that the conservative level of 1 00 pglft was no longer appropriate for the space
and that a higher level (500 pg/ft1 ) more applicable to periodic recreational or industrial use
should be the basis for obtaining clean closure of the firing range. A letter from Eielson AFB
accepting the condition of the firing range at the completion of the demolition is included in
Appendix C.
Although 6 of the 27 confirmation samples did not meet the original cleanup level,
Eielson AFB, ADEC, and EPA personnel agreed that based upon anticipated long-range use.
of the basement facility as an archery range and the fact that no inside air would be exhausted
into the remainder of the building, the achieved cleanup levels as shown in Table 3-3 are
sufficient for obtaifting clean closure of the firing range space.
I:\ElLSON\O5M3O7OI\WPFinal Eielson Reportldoc 3-10 AKT-J07-05M307-322-0002Final 11/98
3.8 PUNCHLIST WORK ITEMS
All the tasks associated with this project could not be completed due to inclement weather
conditions experienced at the end of the 1997 field season. The tasks requiring completion
were noted duiring the final inspection and include the following:
* Vegetation of the former location of two concrete pads;
* Reseeding of an area of lawn used to remove items from the back of the firing range;
* Closure of the openings in the north and south walls of the basement left by the removal ofthe ventilation system and painting of the affected areas on the outside of the building;
* Repair and closure of the trap door at the back of the firing range on the east side ofBuilding 2204 and painting of the affected areas on the outside of the building;
* Removal of a sheet of plywood near the entrance of the range. The plywood was left inplace because it was supporting a sewage line. After Eielson AFB personnel support theline, the plywood will be removed.
On 15 June 1998, BESCORP personnel remobilized to Building 2204 to complete the work
items listed above. Upon completion of these punch list items, USAED and USAF personnel
conducted a final inspection of the project site. USAED and USAF personnel agreed that all
work was satisfactorily completed and that no firther action was required to complete
remediation of the former firing range.
J:\EfiELSN'05M3070l\WPThinaa Eielso Reportl~do 3-11 AKT-107-05M307.i22.0002Final 11I98
(intentionally blank)
LI:\IESONMO5M3O7OIWWh~inui flelson Rep~ofl doc 3-12 AKT-JO7-05M307-J22-0002Final 1 1/98
4.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
4.1 WASTE STAGING
All wastes removed from the firing range were properly packaged, labeled, and marked for
transportation in accordance with the work plan and applicable regulations. Dumpsters were
set-up in the exclusion zone for the metal waste going to DRMO, and the solid waste going to
the Fairbanks North Star Borough (FNSB) landfill. The super sacks of sand and lead bullet
fragments were staged on wood pallets in the exclusion zone. One drum of contaminated
sawdust, one drum containing the light ballasts, and one super sack containing the
contaminated HEPA filters from the portable dry vacuums and the vacuum truck were staged
in the hazardous waste staging area prior to being transferred to the Eielson AFB Hazardous
Materials Section. A summary of waste disposition activities is presented in Table 4-1.
Appendix D, Waste Management Document, contains copies of all records of waste
disposition including bills of lading and certificates of recycling.
Table 4-1 Summary' of Waste Disposition
Description Q uantityj Units JDisposition Destinatlon/TreatmentFiring range sand and lead 103 Tons Recycling Exide Smelter in Baton
bullet fragments Rouge, LouisianaDrum of contaminated 5 Gallons Disposal Eielson AFB Hazardous
sawdust Materials Section/DRMOLight ballasts 300 Pounds Disposal Elelson AFB Hazardous
Materials Section/DRMOLead contaminated filters I Super Disposal Eielson AFB Hazardous
and rags (IDW) Sack Materials Section/DRMOBuilding construction 23,040 Pounds Disposal Fairbanks North Star
materials Borough LandfillSteel plating, ducting, 2:2 Tons Reuse Defense Reutilization and
blowers, target retrieval Marketing Officesystem,
Furniture 250 Pounds Reuse Defense Reutilization and___________________ __________ ~~~~Marketing Office
I:\E]EISOJ\05M30701\WA'hFinaj Ficlso Reportidoc 4-1 AKT-JO7-05M307j22-0002Final I11/98
4.2 FIRING RANGE SAND DISPOSITION
The results of the treatability study indicated that the firing range sands could not be
cost-effectively treated to reduce the lead contamination to a point below regulatory levels.
Several other options remained for treatment and/or recycling of the sands. The most
expensive of these options was determined to be transportation and disposal of the sands as a
RCRA hazardous waste through DRMO or a private transportation, storage, and disposal
facility (TSDF). The most cost-effective option identified was to transport the sands under a
bill of lading to a lead smelter to be used as flux material. Because the results of the
treatability study proved the silica and lead contents to be sufficiently high, the material could
be used as a feed stock through a smelter thereby "recycling" the lead. This option is the most
cost effective, meets transportation and disposal regulations, and reduces the government's
liability by not creating a hazardous waste requiring "cradle to grave" management and
tracking.
With guidance from ADEC, EPA, USAF, and USAED, several lead smelters and their
associated state environmental regulatory departments were contacted to arrange for treatment
and/or disposal of the sands. Documentation of the regulatory agencies' approvals of the
transportation and disposal of the firing range sands is presented in Appendix C. Ultimately,
the Exide Smelter in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was selected for the disposition of the sands.
Arrangements were made with the smelter to accept the material under a bill of lading and
treat the material as a flux feed stock. The super sacks of firing range sand were loaded into
five tractor trailers for shipment to the Exide Smelter. Due to the relatively small size of the
smelter, only one trailer (containing approximately 21 tons of sand) could be shipped at a
time. Because the smelter could only handle one trailer every two weeks, the trailers were
temporarily staged at Lynden Transportation's yard in Fairbanks, Alaska. Lynden's yard was
chosen for the staging location so the trailers would not be blocked in by snow removal
activities at Eielson AFB. The bills of lading for the sand and certificates of recycling are
presented in Appendix D.
I\EIELONMOSM3O7Ol\WThinaI Eielson Reponli.do 4-2 AKT407OS5M3O7-J22-0002Final 11/98
* ~~4.3 STRIKE PLATE, ARMOUR PLATE, AND DUCT DISPOSITION
The steel strike plate, armor plating, and ventilation system ducting removed from the range
were cut into manageable pieces and placed in a designated dumnpster at the site provided by
DRMO. When the dumpster was full and at the conclusion of the removal action, the
dumpster was picked up by DRMO. The metal wastes were then combined with other metal
waste from the base for recycling or reuse.
4.4 FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE DISPOSITION
During the pre-demolition sampling activity, an inspection was made of the fluorescent lights
in the firing range to determine if the bulbs or ballasts contained PCBs or other hazardous
materials. Because no markings were present indicating the presence or lack of hazardous
materials, the bulbs were treated as if they contained PCBs, containerized in a 5-gallon drum,
and transferred to the Eielson AFB Hazardous Materials Section for disposal. Because they
might contain mercury vapors, the light ballasts were also transferred to the ~Eielson AFB
Hazardous Materials Section.
4.5 CONTAMINATED SAWDUST DISPOSITION
The contaminated drum of sawdust was sampled during the pre-demolition sampling activity
as presented in Section 2.0. The results of the sampling are presented in Table 2-2 and
indicate that solvents (i.e., napthalene, l,2,4-trimethylbenzne, and l,3,5-trichloropropane) are
present above regulated levels.
Following receipt of the analytical data, the drum of sawdust was transferred to the
Eielson AFB Hazardous Materials Section for disposal as a regulated waste.
I:\EELSON\05M30701\WIhFinal Eielson Reporti doc 4-3 AKT-107-05M307-J22-0002Final 11/98
4.6 DISPOSITION OF FURNITURE, TARGET RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, ANDVENTILATION SYSTEM BLOWERS
The furniture, the target retrieval system, and the blowers from the ventilation system were
removed from the range during the demolition and staged in the exclusion zone. The items
were transferred to DRMO for reuse or recycling at the conclusion of the removal action.
[AEO.SOM05M307OMP~~~~~~~~inal Eielson Reportl~~~~~~~~m 4-4 AKT-JO7-OSM307-J22-0002~~~~~~~~~~
Final I U98~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT
5.1 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
Sample collection, handling, analysis, and reporting procedures as defined in the Sampling
and Analysis Plan Addendum were followed. Most data acceptance criteria were met, with,
the few exceptions defined in this section. All data are considered usable.
The analytical data was provided by the laboratory in both hardcopy and electronic formats.
One hundred percent of the analytical hardcopy data was reviewed. Fifty percent of theelectronic data was reviewed for completeness and accuracy. The primary laboratory, CAS,
located in Anchorage, Alaska, supported the analytical requirements of the 1997 demolition.
The data review and completeness check was performed by Jacobs. The review process
described in the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) Addendum and the Standard Sampling
Analysis Plan (SSAP) was followed, including a review of summary forms, CoC records, run
logs, and extraction logs.L
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) laboratory acceptance criteria and EPA National
Functional Guidelines (EPA 1994a~b) criteria were used to assess the data usability. The
Jacobs project chemist performed a completeness check on the hardcopy data and reviewed
the hardcopy and electronic data to evaluate comparability and accuracy. Data qualifications
used to determine usability are based upon EPA 1994a~b.
Appendix B, Analytical Data, is included to supplement this section of the report: This
appendix provides case narratives, cooler receipt forms, a summary of the laboratory
nonconformance issues, a description of laboratory-implemented corrective actions, and
sample conditiob receipt documents. It also contains CoC records, which provide sample
identification information, site locations, method requirements, and sampling dates and
identifies quality assurance/quality control (QAIQC) samples.
LIEEIESON\0530701\W~hinui EiclsonRepoitido 5-1 AKT-)07-05M4307-122.0002Final 11/98
The analytical data quality objectives (DQO) for this demolition shall be met when the quality
of the sample data meet precision, 'accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and
comparability (PARCC) requirements as defined in the SAP Addendum, QAPP, Laboratory
Quality Assurance Project Plan (LQAPP), and analytical methods. These DQOs were
evaluated by reviewing the following QA parameters and criteria:
* Precision
- Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSD); and
- Field Duplicates.
* Accuracy
- Calibrations;
- Surrogate;
- Lab Control Samples/Spikes (LCS);
- Matrix Spikes (MS);
- Retention Times;
- Relative Response Factors (RRF);
- Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD);
- Method Blanks;
- Gas Chromatograph (GC) Confirmation;
- Tune Criteria Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS); and
- Internal Standards (GCIMS).
* Representativeness1
- Sample CoC;
- Holding Times and Preservation; and
- Work Plans.* Comparability
- Standard Operating Procedures (SOP); and
- Established hinalytical methods.
* Completeness
- Samples;
- Data Packages; and
- 95 percent completeness.
IXEmlESOMq\0M3070I\WThinal Eielson Reponil.doc 5-2 AKT-iO7-05M307-i22-0002Fina1 11/98
Reported data within this package should be considered valid but may be biased
(qualifications noted in the body of this report). The qualifiers used to flag data are defined as
follows:
*"U"-Synonymous with "ND" for non-detect; not detected above the reporting limit(practical quantitation limit); final numerical result becomes the reporting limit flaggedwith "U."
*"J"-Analyte was positively identified, but numerical value of concentration is approximatedue to compromised quality control or inherent inability to analyze the sample (e.g., matrixeffects).
*"U.J-The analyte was not reported above the practical quantitation limit, but the reportedquantitation limit is approximate (due to compromised quality control or inherent inabilityto analyze the sample).
*"UR"-The analyte was not detected above the reporting limit, but sample results wererejected due to significant, deficiencies in quality controls or inherent ability to analyze thesample (e.g., matrix effects).
The qualifiers listed above, or "flags," are hyphenated in the report to reflect the basic
rationale behind the qualification (e.g. "J-S"). The following qualifiers were used in the text
of this report to indicate which QA/QC protocols were not met:
* S-surrogate recovery;
- *~~~ L-lab control sample;
. C-calibration;
. T-instrumnent 1 2-hour tuning criteria;
* M-matrix spike and/or spike duplicate;
1 -internal standard;
*B-method blank;
.H-for holding times; and
E -value exceeds instrument calibration range.
5.2 DATA QUALITY SUMMARY
in general, the overall quality of the data was acceptable. The data quality was determined as
acceptable or estimated. Acceptable data are associated with QC data that meet all QC criteria
or with QC samples that did not meet QC criteria but data quality objectives were not
I:\EIELON05M30701\'W~himui Eielson Reporti dc 5-3 AKCT-07-05NO07-122.0002Final 11/98
affected. Estimated (J) results are considered inaccurate due to a bias created by matrix
interference or QC acceptance criteria which were not met. The EPA National Functional
Guidelines (EPA 1994a~b) were used to evaluate the acceptability of the data.
All CoC sample identification numbers include JE (Jacobs Engineering), BE (Brice
Environmental), 97 (1997), FIB (Eielson AFB), three numbers (individual sample number
starting at 100) and two letters that identify the type of sample collected (i.e., CM=
construction material, US = unknown solid). The term positive results is used to identify all
results that are not considered non-detected (U) and all results refers to both nondetected andpositive results. The term non-defected (U) refers to results that are less than the laboratory
reporting limit and detection limits will, therefore, be qualified or biased.
Details of the evaluation are provided in the following sections by analytical method and
include the associated samples and analytes:
Volatile Organic Compounds (BTEXNV-SW8260A. Overall data quality is acceptable with
the following exceptions:
* The positive result for toluene in sample JE97EIE136US is considered estimated (J-B)because it was also found in the blank.
* The 8260 surrogate recovery in sample JE97EIEl36US was outside normal laboratorycontrol limits because of suspected matrix interference. The sample was re-analyzed, andagain produced results outside control limits. The results from the original analysis arereported.
* The 8260 soil Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MSIDMS) recoveries of severalanalytes were outside the normal laboratory 9ontrol limits because of matrix interferencescaused by excessive levels of naphthalene. No further corrective action was taken.
* The 8260 soil MSIDMS recovery of naphthalene was not calculated. The analyteconcentration in the sample was significantly higher than the added spike concentration,preventing accurate evaluation of the spike recovery.
As a result of the interferences created by the fuel contamination in the sawdust sample,
surrogate and matrix spike recovery criteria were not met; however data are usable for waste
characterization and disposal purposes.
lALSONMMOSM3070I\WThinal Fielscn Report!.doc 5-4 AKT-J07-05M3074122-0002Final 11/98
I
Total Lead (wipe sarmplesY~-SW 601 0: The data quality objectives were met.
TCLP Lead (bulk materials')-SW 1311/6010: Overall the data quality is acceptable.
However, an insufficient sample was provided to obtain the required minimum 100 gram
I ~~~aliquot necessary to perform the requested TCLP/131 1 extraction. As footnoted, the amount
of extraction fluid was adjusted according to the amount of sample provided; 50.1 grams of
- ~~~sample JE97EIE I7OLN was extracted into 1 000 ml and 44.8 grams of sample JE97EIEL17 1LN
was extracted into 896 ml. The reporting limit was not impacted.
Total Lead (soils)--SW 601 0: The data quality objectives were met.
TCLP RCRA Metals-S W6010/7000: The data quality objectives were met.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)-405. IlM: The data quality objectives were met.
Carbon. Total Organic (TOCY-ASTM D4129-82M: The data quality objectives were met.
I. ~ ~ Io-W0 A:Tedt ult ojcie eemt
Siron-S W60O1OA: The data quality objectives were met.
Considering these noncompliance issues, the data are still considered usable. The overall
project completeness goal of 95 percent was met.
IAEWISON\05M30701\WThinal Ejel=o Reponl .do 5-5 AKT-JO7-05M307.J22-0002Final 11N98
(intentionally blank)
I \EIELSONWO5M3O7OlXWP.inAI Flelsotn Report! dclc 5-6 AKCT-J07-05M307-J22.0002Final 11/98
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Analytical results of confirmation wipe samples collected following completion of the range
demolition were compared to the cleanup standards in the HUD guidelines for lead removal
actions. Although the levels indicated in the confirmation sample results were higher than the
action level of 100 i~tgl~originally established for this project, USAF, USAED, ADEC, EPA,
and Jacobs representatives decided the levels remaining in the basement of Building 2204 do
not represent a hazard for the intended reuse of the space and that a cleanup level of
500 pg/ft'is more appropriate for the space.
No further action is recommended for this site.
I:EIELSObAOSM3070I\WP\fkal Eidlson Repotl~doc 6-1 AKT-J07-05M307-J22-0002Final 11/98
(intentionally blank)
BEIELSOMOSM30701%Winal Eiclson Reponl~~~~~~~~~~~~~~doc 6-2 AKT-JO7-OSM307-J22-0002~~~~~~~~~~Final 11198~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
7.0 REFERENCES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1997 (May). Bench-Scale Treatability Study,Indoor Range Sands, Elelson AEB, Alaska.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1997 (August 14). Engineering Evaluation,Indoor Range Sands Treatment and Disposal, Eielson AFB, Alaska.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1997 (June 14). Technical Memorandum on Wipeand Soil Sampling of Indoor Firing Range (AOC-3 2), Eielson AFB, Alaska.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1995 (June). Guidelines forthe evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1994a (February). Con tract Laboratory ProgramNational Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, EPA-540/R-94-o013.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1 994b (February). Con tract Laboratory ProgramNational Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, EPA-540/R-94-O012.
Jacobs Engineering. 1997 (July). Work Plan, Eielson AFB, Alaska.
LAEIELSONWO5M307OIAW~hinal Pielson Repertldoc 7-1 AKT-307-05M307.322-0002Final 11/98
(intentionally blank)
IAEIELSON\05M430701\W~hinal Etelson Repofll.doc 7-2 AKT-J07-05M307-i22-0002Final I1/98
APPENDIX A
i- ~~~~~~PHOTOGRAPHS
I
L~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Basement - Building 2204. Vacuuming the HVAC system.
West wall of Building 2204. 6" high vacuum hose running from the super suckervacuum truck to the basement.
I E[ELSON\05M30701\photos\Bldg2204.dcw
Parking Lot - West of Building 2204, Super sucker vacuum truck,
Bullet trap pit - Basement of Building 2204. Using the stinger to "excavate" (or remove)the sands and bullets for the pit.
I TIELSONOMM3C7OI Vhotas\BIdg2204doc
Basement - Building 2204. Demolition of Room #2.
Parking Lot - West of Building 2204. Removal of dust from the cyclone,
4M\EELSON\OSM307OI~pholos\Hidg2204.dc
Parking Lot - North of Building 2204. Use of the stinger to maxiuxn the suction duringthe removal of lead bullets from the parking lot.
Parking Lot - North of Building 2204. Completion of lead bullet removal activities.
I\E1FLSON'\O5M3O701~photos\,BIdg2O4.dm
Basement - Building 2204., Remainder of range floor sands prior to removal.
Parking Lot - West of Building 2204. Transferring sands between bags to ensure all bagsare below the 2200 lb. capacity.
IATEiLSONPO$M30O1O1pho~os'BI42204,dO
II
I
.
I
APPENDIX B
I ANALYTICAL DATA AND MIR MONITORING RESULTS
I
I
Ii
I1'
I
LEAD ANALYSIS F rLee Group, ALASKACileni 'AJLV The materlcls Chiaractoerization Speclohsfl
6ldSNalsoISfWOy AfICbO(VOOAK 99518
Client JobS I RJLGAX# Ot:o ~ p phone 902.36242)8 Fox y07462-32I8
Job name/loc~otn E PFL.T '07 #LA4L 24 CollegefRoad FOirbants, AK 99709
Crderad by 7; II Uh~~~~r Phone 907-A5243974 F=x901452-3914
PAGE I.. Of..tSampleds by--.O j AMata __I_ ___D_ __
D~~t? flM UUWOOIQSED ST QCMPAXt' uenivuE IT COMPANYl Af 24 ti~Mauls
- ,Sdc&Ada.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g tuh Al AMw
LA I# U~~ gf Ai$AJAFLC wY o ~? wua wl SUI U
LvO~~ 'd~n % AMA VS.£ iM 5 L ihlWUGt
-J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.G
L T~T~lFEMY~ OTMkZ1 TOrA).Z±
jt~atiSA*LEPU?,M$AMPIlTYPE tOUM Me WiUMLUWO
oC`T-&"r~-' TUE 16:42 DQACOICHEM.L-A)S 90?- 479 qZ4 p.02
L.EAD ANALYSIS flj Lee Group, ALASKA.Client~ ~ ~ 1 The Materials Characcerizatlon Speclalisft
6148 NIelSOn Way AflchoroUO.AK MIS1Client job 4 lt RJILGAK# ",a 9. Phone 90?-562-4210 FoX 907.562-3218
job nmam/IoeOtofll -cifF~ o 72O4̀ 24W College Rood Fairbanks. AK 99709
Ordere bY-~~ L~cr-ANWi PhOne 9O7-4.524974 fOx 907-452-3974
Samptad bY-UJ -~QPAGE L OF I...
Fat Resuiltito AIRBILL* __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tA! asI UWEQSNSD ST COMAW4 RECOiVED ay COMPANY a Afte 2* Nci
A, -A. ej Cl~~~~~ RuSh 048 Ros
0 8 H01. CQ 72 Nov
vJaCAt IAM+_ *IUMI ~ SAMPLE TYPE ThAI PGW "Mf YLMUM I IIU(t~f
0 C C ~ ,ojizk 0 3 LAN K 7II I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
iv t to -111AREA START TR
LOCADION: .ERO IA -7iSTOPl A2 Zr 5.A .I&UI (MotI
OE4V1oHmmewT OTAL TOTA 2 - _ __ _ __ _ _
RJLQI LAm IM PUMPS f OATh 5fAMp"fp "'LIM TwiME (nowt
Jo& ,[u&In C] SLANK
LOCA~~~iON: ~ ~ 1PERSONAL I2~w TR
~j~n 4~tv~ a..~.- DaE&ARMCE
lype OF REMOVAL: EV31M~ TTL.4~Tr
I 1CA111I AMPLE1 S L~t sAMPLE TYPE TIME VOW utAn VILC IP UJII(GW
oo3 nA'Itn 3TART C%. STARTc
ILOCAIIONI STOPON4-' -
C--:rw M~~~cLEARANCE- sTtop nUl (@M
tYPE OF REMOVAL,. OA OA 2
iJLCAK I IAMDLI ? umI Sitf_ SAMP LE TY P E 1111M !LW SAE Y'OLum* WIPE ESULI3 jUG,?)
OaLQ , 0 BLANK
LOCA~~~iON: OFEES~~~6ONAL 22L TM o3 1 AI I I ES1 I TS ( n I '
vr F uo O / S im-, w t A!'o OaCLaARA NCE ZfO s o STOP < 0
OYP F tReM O v 4L ~ I Y I N B T ,L
ot Ai
-l _tRa A OUM ilRli U-9
t i Cl A MPL11 P
UM PNI b AS SA M PL ETY PE I ! lO m l OL M w r s s y . - p
L CAl U PERSO NA1 Z Ž z s l ~ U f ( UO/M )
rY PE OF REM OVA U: ~ * NV IRON AH T t <?A 4 otA
Plea se fax resulta to c l ient a s. note d obov e a n d
to RJ Lee G roup, A la sk a a t 907.5 62-32 1W .
LEAD ANALYSIs ieGruASKjClient KLA-.f AAn w o The Materials Chomacterlzat(ori Specialist3
22n~~~~ LLA 4 ~6148 NIelson Way Anchorage. AK 9951eClient Job # O ARJLGAK# Phn/9742418FX O5I~1
Jcb name/location ~~~~~~ Wrw~~ ~ 2A0r College Road Fakbanks. AK 99709Ordered b~~~\~pPhone 907-452-3974 Fox 907-452-397
Sampled by-,~k PAGEAQ OF
flAtE TIME R!LINIQASI4EO By COMPANY BtctywB COMPANIY Afler Q U NOw
RAA LAMMLI* PumpI DATE SAMPE TYPE Tw FOW RATE VoLUMt wire MULT utysI [ J w k 11 PI, 1 BLANK -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. tAREA START $TlO 35WT
LOCATION: DPERSONAL IA-LP AI RSU I UGM 4
S a~~
RAIJGAIKO ISAMPLES PUMP I OAT! SAMPLE TYPE TIME PLOW BAIT VOLUME~ WF EUT UIej3 3 t41 C BLANK _ _ _ _ _ _ IEE LS c cn
L OCATION: tJPERSONAL 2 2 nOCLEARANCE s"op &j.1 4 TPARA1V (UGIM)
N~PE OF REMOVAŽF to,~~j FVRNt TOTALTOA `.
MIMP U D~lISAMPLE TYPE 1IME FLOW RAET VOLUME *,Fs REMUTS '(US9/w)
0 BLANKC3 AREA START ~~STARTtOCAIION: OPERSONA&L -________
OCLEARANCE siUr pPARASII U/''NPE OF REMOVAL; [3NIOMFT
TOTAL TOTAL.
RJLAK SAMPLEIf PUMP, OATE SAMFLETYPE WuM ROW PRm VOLUME WiPe REULTS (UGS'T)
EJ AREA START ~START4 LOCAIION: DPERSONAL STPARRSLS(U/M)
DCLEARANCE ro? tyAR EUT' ~~E OF RSMOVAL fl8NVIRONMENTTOAPE OF RFM~~~~~vAL: ~~TOTALTOARJLOAXI SAJPLIE PMP U BATESAMPLE TYPE iTag Now ni VOLUME wiPE BESULTI (ua/h?)
I I j D~~~1 CLANK- I- - IJ~~~~~~~~E AREA START START
LOCA11,0N: D3PERSONAi.SO I ESII(QM
Tht'S OF REMOVAL: TOTALoTOTA
Please fax results to client as noted above and* ~~~~to.RJ Lee Group. Alaska at 9O7-562-3218.
LEAD ANALYSIS j e ruAAKClienttp &L~'aThe Materials Characteorization Spc 0 j~
-- .4 StdS~~~~~~~~~64NleLsanWoy Anchorage, AK 9951aClient Job # gRJLGAK# g>: f~,t ct, Phone 907-562-4218 fOX 907-562-3218
Job name/location ~ ~ ~ ~ AZ1042400 College Road Fairbanks, AK 997Q9Ordered ~~~~~~~~~~~~Phone 907-452-3974 PCX 907-452-3974
Sampled byvey PAGE .. .. OF . 4Fax Results to LA\51Z - s 'i% AIRBILLO III _________
DAtE TIME RUIUNIQUISKED BY COMPANY RECEIVED BY COMPANY C3 After C1 24 HoL,
Sri i44#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L. ~~~~~HoursC3 Rush Q 0Hu
La BHour Vl72 M
IJLCAK A AMrPLI U PUMPWI OAT" SAMPLE TYPE TVAI FLOW tAll VOUM winE Sntilt (Utailf)
LOCATION: ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~RE START ~:4 START
1C~~Aoc4 5~~.k.Jvt\ DCLEAYANCE STO *a?, 10 STOP AAR INUtILLS(3 I
rIPE OFREMOVAL: OENVIRNow.ENr TOTAL SI\\TOTAL. Z6 - -7
310G SMLE PUMPe DATS SAMPLE TYPE Mt no fOWm VOL1JMI WIPE AESOUf (UG/Y?)
015 55 ~~~ q 0 BILANKo3 AREA START r~3r ,LOCAIION LPSNA
ECLEARANCE STOP LSIt STOP .5 I'A4 All RESUL&TS (CJQIM')
lrp fO 0 REMOVAL, ~"DRONMtNTTOATTL < .
hILGAK I SAMPLIC pilmP £ AT? SAMPLE TYPE Two'RO RAT VOLUME WIFE RESULTS (07oie)
OSLANK -
oAMEA VA~R STAR?LOCATION: OIFERSONAL-
D3CLEARAN4CE STOP STPAll RESULTS tUG/mi)
TYPE OF REMOVAL7 cOeIRO$MW OTA TOTAL
tItcAXe I AMPLE # Pump* OA SAMPLE TYPE TIKE ROW RAWT VOLUAE Will R6MULS (LIC/F?)
o3 BLANK STR ATo AREA STT ARLOCATION: OPERSONAL
OCLEAdRANC& STPSO AllmIESULTS (UGIM)
TYPE OP REMAOVAL: 0SVIOK1CTOTAL TOTAL
IfLOAt I IAnlft IM "u" DAtE SAMPLE TYPE TIME nowlOW MuVUMI WI?* IESUTS (96Iifl)
o3 BLANKO3 AEA STAR START
tOCAAIQN: DP`86ONAL. -
OCLEARM4CE sro~~~ STOP AIR RESULTS (uG/M')
IYPEOIFREMOVAL: TOTAL TOTAL
Please fax resutJ~5to client as noted above andto RJ Lee Group, Alaska at 907-562-3218.
- %J~~~~n~~rt..r~~~c~~s ,~~~....0
LEAD ANALYSIS nj Lee Group., ALASKA,Client lhrA( rrtThe mgiteriois Characteeization Spe~ijqj~fs
L -~~~~J ~~6148 NIelgon Way Anchorage.AK 99519Client JOb V :I-V~, RJLGAKE * Phone 901-562-421 8 Fax 907-562-3218a
Job name~~ocotson ~~ ~A~Th~~.'A'L/ t7i1oj 2400 College Road Fairbanks. AK 990Ordered bf~~~~~~~j,~~\ ~P hone 907-452-3974 Fax 907-452-3974
Sampled b JO- A ji PAGE ______OF
Fax Results to AIRBILL*
DAT TIME ZILINIOUISKE0by IV COMPANY RECZNO Sy COMPANY C3 After 0 4Hu
W aHour 7 o
SAMPEI= D0 UM I -AT SAMlPLE TYPE UN FLOW Ul eaUrsWittea (UG/Pf
01~~ ~ lp V\ a AREA STR SLTARIT
LOCATION: UPEIMONALiTPARIII Iemr 0VI i c C4+ OCLEARANcE "TOP ITP1T' IRa~t(@
TYPE OF REMOVAL: TOTAL4695 TOmA
1ULCAK S IIAMPLA PUMP U ASSAMPLE TYP IEFLOW SATE VOLUME Witt,. LT UjF~-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 LARNA START START
LOCATION: DPERSONAL M IUT 'OP'
TYPE OF REMOVAL: TOTAL TVTAL
tJ 5SAMPLED UPU DT SAMPLE TYPE TIMS PLOW NATS VokumE YIE alPS tir U/
C3 ILANK
LOCATION. 0 ~~~~~~~~~~AREA SrART START
CcLEARANCE STOP STOP JUN RESULTS (lUG/M)
¼ NPC~~TO 0 REMOVAL: BAONSI TOTAL. TOTAL
NAGICAX U 6"PUMPE CATS SAMPLE TYPE TIEFLOW JUIL! VOWUME WiFIPIRULTS (UG/Ff
0 C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BLANK SATSA-1 ~ -A- 3 AREA AT
LOCATION: flPEsONAL l LtTI IQ4*
OCLEsRNCE 'Top STOAlPEULS(UfA
TYPE OF REMOVAL CENVIJINMNT TOTAL TOTAL
SJLGAK AI L SAMPLETYIPE T&ME FLOW 1S4l1 VOLUME WIPE mu REULT TO i1)*
C3 BLANK- ~~~~1 AREA START START
LOCATION: 03PEsoNAL
ITYPE OF REMOVAL: 70TALONM TOTAL
Pleasefax results to client as noted above andto RJ Lee Group, Alaska at 907-562-3218.
LEAD ANALYSIS RI Lee 6roup, ALABSKClient \~Jk ~ ~The Materials Characterization Specialists
\7*~~~~J ~ ~~~ 6IANielsonWay Anchceage, AK 99519Client Job # ~ , RJLGAK# I -ti Phone 907-562-4218 PcI 907-$62-321e
Job name/locoitonQ .- 1v'iy"o *"Zzo!~ 2400 College Rood Fairbanks, AK C07o
Ordered bV~~~~~>\\ 0 Vbtr ~~Phone 907-45243974 fox 907-452-3774
Sampled by PAGE ' ~ OF ___
Fax Results to "452 s-110 AIRBILL# IP_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _
DAT? WIM R!UNIQUIINID1BY COMPANlY nevnIT COMPANY 0 ARef 03 24 Now
U Bihlouf ZHor
RJAGAKI SAMP19 I =OmP E DATE SAMPLE TYPE ntIM FLOW RATS VOLUEAS WinE guantti cuonfL'J~~~~~ ~BLANK START TR
LOCATION: Ow w ONAL, srrAEMVI(et
st~~f CICEARANCE STJLO _ ___
r(PE OF REMOVAL: QENVIRONMENT OALdnU TAL3 C LIJICAKI SAFt PM Mmri SAMPLE TYPE TIME FLOW IPAT VOLUME WIPE hIEJULIS (vain?)
I___ 0 BLANK-- g~~4 pI• 3s 1/ow'r?' C AREA STR TR
LOCATION: OPERSONAL Alin Vi"
WicI1n t. ,17CIEAWA4CE STOP ~~saType OF REMOVAL: *tVIRONMENT ?OIAL TOTAL 3(?
s j a ~~~UF AT ut_ _tiLAKe 3AMrL9d FLf~lSMPETP OW RAT VOLUME WiPt ESmi~su CUC/wiI L......L........AN
o AREA STA0t 3TART
LOCATION: DPERSONAL.STPAREULS %.MO3CLEARANCE 'To'AALEUTI(~l"
type OF REMO VAV.0,~c~~ TOTAL TOTAL
ItLAg~9t SAMPLftE PUMPP DAT SAMPLE TYPE WUE PLOW LATE VLM IERSLS(G'
___If 0w.~13BLNK- C~~~ AREA START STAIT
LOCATION: O3PRSONALAlRELT(UI'OCLEMAANCE STOP STOP AlRSLSEGM
TYPE OF REMOVAL:,EVRO~4 TOTAl TOTAL
lit"Itt SAPPP#te SAMPLE TYPE TIM now AEVOLME LTvs: CUG[Fe')I C C AREA S~?TRLOCATION! OPESONAAI 0iini./A
OCLEARANCiE sOr TTOP ARIILS(GM
IYPE OF REMOVAL: CW4VIROI4AEJJT TOTAL TOTAL
Please fox results to client as noted above andto RJ Lee Group, Alaska at 907.562-3218.
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9701018Project: EAFH Firing Range Date Received: October 30, 1997I ~~~Sample Matrix: Solid
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). 'This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACQE data d'eliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional qualitycontrol analyses reported herein include. Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS), Laboratory/DuplicateLaboratory Control Sample (LCS/DLCS), and Imnital Continuing Calibration Verification Standards (ICV/CCV).
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
The following difficulties were experienced during analysis of this batch:
Insufficient sample was provided to obtain the required minimum 100 gram sample aliquot necessary to performthe requested TCLP\1 311 extraction. As footnoted, the amount of extraction fluid was adjusted according to theamount of sample provided; 50.1 grams of sample JE97EIE17OLN was extracted into 1000 ml and 44.8 grams ofsample JE97EIEI1I71LN was extracted into 896 ml.
Approved by Date IIIto1q, 0 0 00 1;!
o 00
-
CL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 9- ,-
A MA
--
r.9
o "9~~~~~~~o
tt '
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
* ~~~Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9701018Project: EAFB Firing RangeCooler received on: 10/30/97 and opened on 10/30/9 7 by Sherry Long
Yes No /1 Were custody seals on outside of cooler? RI 0
If yes, how many and where? 2 F & BWere signature and date correct? MXI 0
2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? MI 0: 03 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? MR 01 54 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )9 0X 0 0
- ~~~~5 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? 177 0 0l6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? MR 5 57 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 01 0 MR8 Temperature of cooler upon receipt 5.8 Degrees C
- ~~Explain any discrepancies: ______________________________
Yes No Sample I.D. Rage Vol.- ~~~pH Reagent x
12 NaOH x2 HNO3 X2 H2S04 x
- ~~Yes all samples OKNo =Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments:
n
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9700999Project: EAFB Firing Range Date Received: 10/27/97Sample Matrix: Wipe
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were perforned consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACOE data deliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional qualitycontrol analyses reported herein include: Laboratory/Duplicate Laboratory Control Sample (LCS/DLCS) and IntialContinuing Calibration Verification Standards (ICV/CCV).
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
Approved by A"- ateI l/uf17 0 0 00
__JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC A o 009 71GE 4300 B STREET SUITE 600. ANCHORAGE. ALASKA MM035222® I TELEPHONE (9O7I 563-32 FAX 1907) 563.332 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDUSE A BALLPOINT PEN, BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
POETNUMBER: 44140 \es ~Mp(3v2 WBS COO!: ~~~~~~SUBCONTRACT I0.0. No.mq¶23 (11
cacilou ..~~~~ - - \A-v <"A, 1 _7_ I-f(COLLECTM.~a -~tt
4 3 -CA_-_ _0_ti c4.& Ga SI o-Tag fyj61 %
51 14 1-1 ts~ ae A %^.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
V - ~~~~C- rt-___tea_ K~ V-V IEal_ _ _ _ _ _
CO_ c4RILeJb\t.ne -_
IWHC'.-.J __ C IS__ t-+LC O M M _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _rb: ~IWSS.J '½I ta (L.JflA _ __A _ _ _ _ L I0 5 0
- _ _6.1 _3_ _tf l i t I oB Y 1_ _ _ _ _ _ _
IREot BY_ _AT T___ REU0411SE m DAT TIM
4~~
a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RECORD RETURNED BY DATE TIME~~~~~~~~~O~h IM
SlIPPING NUBR
DISTIhBUTIONJ W1411 - PROJECT FRLE /CANARY - LAB REatPT /PME - DATA k4ANAGEMBNT CGQDGOO - Fa , jn c
CZG LI
.4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0
- JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC ~E 4300 6 STREET. SUITE 600 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 995035922 -II ®TELEPHONE (907l 5633322 FAX (0 56330CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDUSE A BALLPOINT PEN, BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PRJETNAE LBOMRY"a AD_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'4 f .- s a A k j
PROJECT NUMBER:H¾ 37~~~~ U -~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~sast~~~~~~~~~~~~~A
W&S CODE: SUBCONTRACT I D.O. No. ______________ ~,~\ I
IC .__ __ ......
c~~~~~uxc~~~~~
IT s __ _ _ _ _ _ 'w T ho e. U4e
CIEL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
_____ __ ~~~~~~~~r- e& I - I
w'i~~ RELEAS~~~tt ATEiETURNAROUND TUME " 4 ~ /2___RECE ~~~~~~~DATE TIME REUNOUS14ED BY DATE T
RECORD RETURNED BYDAE TE
SHWPPING NUMBEA:
rASTRUBJIN: WHM - PROJECT FILE ICANARI - LAS RECEIPT PM Pt DATA MANAG8OET I2 GOL ' /EL.{D
'-'
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC /90/7099c?;Ut®TELEPHONE (9071 563.3322 FAX 107) 563.3320 CANOF CLWDy RECORD
USE A BALLPOINT PEN. BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACKPROJECT NAME: OT4A153ADot
PSOJCT NUMBER:
WBS CODE: ~~~SUBCONTRACT / 0.0.N.
WUS CO~ ?tt. '' -o34coixegio v '' mu S
4- M L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S I
-'~~~~~~IZ If. N\
_______ LLr%) SA
* _ __DRUTCN WHE-POEC IEIW - A-EEP I PM -_ DAI M"&AGME? ( I GkLD8iiM-FIELD
_____ _ - It2-~~~~~~~o nf
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9700999
Project: EAFB_ Firing Range
Cooler received on' 10/27/97 and opened on 10/27/97 by Sherry Long
Yua No WAI Were custody seals on outside of cooler? MR 01 0
If yes, how many and where? 2 F & B
Were signature and date correct? El 0 02 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? MR 0 Q1
3 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? MR 03 04 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? MR 0 05 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? r0- 0 0-6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? MR 01 07 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 0R 0 08 Temperature of cooler upon receipt 14.7 Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: ______________________________
Yes No Sample I.D. Reage Vol.
pH Reagent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
12 NaOH _ _ _ _ _ _ __
2 HNO 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2 H 2 S 04 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes =all samples OK
No =Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _
__________________
000j
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, MNC.
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9700967Project: Eielson Firing Range/05M30701 Date Received: 10/16/97Sample Matrix: Soil
I ~ ~~~~~~~~CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACOE data dieliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional qualitycontrol analyses reported herein include: Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS), Laboratory/Duplicate
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSIDLCS), and Initial Continuing Calibration Verification Standards (ICV/CCV).
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
I~ ~~Apoe y t '
__ JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC A I?00 (7~JE 4300 B STREET, SUITE 800, ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 995015922A s TELEPHONE 907) 5813.32 FAX (907) 563-3320 CHAIN OF CUSTDY RECORDUSE A BALLPOINT PEN, BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PROJECT NAME:c A ? itwcr ADOR~t Snt
PR-OJECT NUMBER: = =-1 go'o
WSB CODE: SUBCONTRACT D .0. NO. 4< gs
CO"Mu& a t a: w-oLAkN IT' 1^. - commonV-f "'
EY.. NI//( DATET6E TU lf4NARO"•VoJ_7AY-N
__ __ ~~~~V)I cltl ; tMOj I_ _ _ _ _
R.ECR RETUREDBY ATE1 TUK 1JNAUN U
DITRBUIO: WT RJC IECW DASRCITE P DAE REUNOUSED B CY DATEE
81w9340 lambma~0
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9700967Project: EIEL$ON FIRING RANGE/05M30701Cooler received on: 10/16/97 and opened on 10/16/97 by Sherry Long
Yes NLAI Were custody seals on outside of cooler? MR 0 0
If yes, how many and where? I FrontWere signature and date correct? El 00
2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? [RI 03 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? FX1 0 014 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc ...)? 0 05 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? Q1 Q6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? 0 0 0l7 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 0 0 M
8 Temperature of cooler upon receipt 10.2 Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes No Sample I.D. Rage Vol.pH Reagent _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
12 NaOH2 HN0 3 ____ _ _ _ _ _
2 H-2S 04 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes = all samples OK _________
No = Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, MNC.I
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9700963Project: .Eielson Firing Range/05M30701 Date Received: 10/15/97
Sample Matrix: SoilI
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACQE data deliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional qualityIcontrol analyses reported herein include: Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS), Laboratory/DuplicateLaboratory Control Sample (LCS/DLCS), Initial Continuing Calibration Verification Standards (IC V/CC V), andInitial Continuing Calibration Blanks (ICB/CCB).j
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
Approved by ~- ae~
2 AM;;n
__JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC F¶ W nJE 4300 8 STREET. SUITE 600. ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99535fl22®TELEPHONE (9071563.3322 PAX (907) 543.32 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
USE A BALLPOINT PEN. BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE 1BACK
PRJCNAME:~~ 6 FIfR¶AC. ~L.4S LABOAORYNMOY iEa& DDnSO / hscI, . 4 ,,~IPROJECT NUMBER:Cto 3&?-~ol jb 3n~u(- 3WBS CODE: SIJ8CONTRA / D.o.h AtA -qqj 3
mm ir~Al i s;
tflSO ____ ____ __ ______ ' b fio-. Ift-J. (SW~ wcto_ 3396 li___6 6 t' c___ I6r, tLC\J~C_
np- S. Io q$L ___I
~OfdM lwU: $f A.s Ara Us 0-olfwI
7 ?oV/s-6 3 -33Zt Z_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
COLLECTEDS& REy DATE TKIE IURNAROUND Toe u L A E ! v ~ a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
R By ~~~~~~~DATE TWE 11REUNQJ4IED BY DATE TIME
RECORD RETURNED BY DFATE TME
DISTRIBUTION W1411 - PROJECT RLE /CAN4ARY LAB RECEPT PME - DALA IAANAGmqNT / GQUDfrc - FIED
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9700963Project: Eielson Firing Range/05M30701Cooler received on: 10/15/97 and opened on 10/15/97 by Sherry Long
Yes No LI Were custody seals on outside of cooler? [El9
If yes. how many and where? 2 F &BWere signature and date correct? 0
2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? MI3 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? MR 04 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? [E 01 0-
5 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? 0R C 016 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? MR 9- 97 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 0 03M8 Temperature of cooler upon receipt . Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: Cooler to small to insert thermometer, no temp blank. [
Yes No Sample I.D. Reage Vol.
pH Reagent x L12 NaOH x2 HN0 3 X _______
2 H2S0 4 x L
Yes =all samples OK __________
No =Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Commnents:
Ir.
L2
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: A97000831I Service Request No.: A9700831Project: - Eielson Range Flow Date Received: 9/16/97Sample Matrix: Soil
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(GAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACQE data deliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional quality contrlanalyses reported herein include: Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) and Matrix Spike (MS).
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
¶ ~~~The analyses for TS, BOD, and TOG were performed in our Kelso, Washington laboratory. The Service Requestnumber for this work is K97068 18.
Approved by__________9________ / tI7 0 0 0
0 0o
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
U.~~~~~~~~K~
0 0~ 0 0
rn 0
<W~~~~~~~.
n - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L IL L
LU C) C)
M D i C . ... . .
5 U 1z LL 6~~~~ ~ ~ ~~-t
cooz.. jO ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> 1>
w 1 .L UI z C
Z>-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6M nM(;R &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I. - I- I
M m M1,111r, Co~~cniol, rqlcnlo-,LirwC ii it i
~~------------------------------------
~-------~-------- - - - - -- ii ~ : -- - -
-a-
MOs
* .-) -
w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~
I.
Na-a
- - - - - -- - - -~~~~~~~~~~~~C-S
rflIL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ecc -
.; -.~~~~~~~~~~~~~w -2 Cl
N~~N
600e asojotloav SV.) WM svo 90T M 09C T YVJ fZ 0 T 16/CZ/4
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A970083 1Project: Bielso~n Range FlowCooler received on: 9/16/97 and opened on 9/16/97 by Meghan Kennish
Yu No MLAI Were custody seals on outside of cooler? 0 X 0
If yes, how many and where?
Were signature and date correct? x 0 0
2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc ... )? x o o3 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? x o o
4 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? x 0 o5 Did all~bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? x o o
6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? x o 0
7 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? o o x
S Temperature of cooler upon receipt 4.9 Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: ____________________________
Yes No Sample I.D. Reage Vol.pH Reagent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
12 NaOIH _ _ __ _ _ _ _
2 HN O3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2 H 2 S 04 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes = all samples OKNo = Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments:
00 00 i
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9700656Project: Eielson Indoor Firing Range (AOC 32) DateReceived: 8/13/97Sample Matrix: Soil
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(GAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACQE data deliverables. When
- ~~~appropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test.
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
FDA is a high pressure, total dissolution technique that utilizes a combination of acids (HF, HCI, and HN0 3).Refractory samples, sililateous material and most minerals are completely dissolved using this technique.
Approved by 1~0 Cnate-L//<&f -7
2',
< %A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2t3
0 -, -
C C
45 No~~
E o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ta' 0 t ILfl
CD,
EE
C-4
.s - -
1~~~~~~9 A
U) 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wU ay -
UJ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)4o~~~~~ i.jC)~- 0 Q) LL ILL. I LL LL LL.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
Z Fl- C
~zLL 6zLu 0 si~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C)0 ) iC
>- sŽ~~~~~~~S~I' n oNWQco -dm T Ln LWN co ar c a a r a anc,~~~~~s --- ---- r- - r N C C C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C C
\Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~- ~-
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9700656
¶ ~~~Project:Cooler received on: 8/13/97 and opened on 8/13/97 by Sherry Long
YnNo WAI Were custody seals on outside of cooler? 01 MR0
If yes, how many and where?
Were signature and date correct? MR 0 032 Were custody papers property filled out (ink, signed, etc ... )? MX 0 0
., Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? 5X 1 014 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? MX 0 535 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? 03 06 were correct bottles used for test indicated? 5 57 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 0 08 Temperature of cooler upon receipt Ambient Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: ____________________________
Yes No Sample I.D. Rae Vl
pH Reagent ___ ______
12 NaOH _ _
2. HNO 3 _ __ _ _ _
2 H2 S0 4 ____ __ ________
Yes = all samples OK
No = Samples were preserved at lab as listed
C~ommrents:-
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.I
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Service Request No.: A9700530Project: Eielson Indoor Firing Range (AOC 32) Date Received: 7/16/97Sample Matrix: Solid
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier ACOE-4 data deliverables. Whenappropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional quality controlIanalyses reported herein include: Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS), Laboratory/Duplicate Laboratory ControlSample (LCS/DLCS), and Initial Continuing Calibration Verification Standards (ICV/CCV).
All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
Approved by 24m TC Date 85$/,9,j 000
I ~JAC0dS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.4170S3 i/[JE 430 B STREET. SUITE 00 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA B9503-5922 I,TELEHNCE (907) 503-3322 FAX (907) 5C3320 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
USE A BALLPOINT PEN, BLACK INK. AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
[ PROJECT NAME: LABORATORY NAME &ADDRESS
WBS CODE: SAJBCONTRACT I 0.0. No.9 , t,,es~ *ir ~ { r
* _____ _____ -...--Ar. L51~ Zn q.. ..I.....
I - aS *cA&% se CfVgp!
- 1CA o-I1 C I _______
.T 336v1lat IC 4 c &. bv- ______
lou CM _____ _
jYzfl61& a_ _ _ __ _ _ _
COMMENTt -__ _
RECE "YTE'am~i~ REINQUISHED By1 i7/51Lp DATE TIME
RECORD RETURNED BY DATE TUME
SHUIPPIN NUMBER:
DItSTRJfCIN: WHIITE- PROJECT FILE ICANARI - LAB RECEIPT /pW- DATA MAJ4A;E.IBT/ -ODERO
L~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.JE4300 9 STREET. SUITE 60ANCH4ORAGE, ALASKA 9O,03.5922CHICUTDTELEPH4ONE(907) 5633322 FAX(907) 56-3320 CANOF CSOYRECORD
USE A BALLPOINT PEN. BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PROJECT NAE: CYNAEADOtflJ~~~s g~~~f 1114*1 CAo:~ Llft3ZJD
PROJECT NUMBER: A ICVWEIS CO0E: SUBCONTRACT I 0.0. No.A .tvt4 )U 9r3wo
... . ... ... Rallied, -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3~coLL~lN '
SAMPLE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tt IC
10s O ML 2 s C MC M _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I C,
COMMINIS LA tU5 a-9, _ ____-
4r rcci~ Ce.J A,&i vs (4w:o4r-ra Cs...s$e* \SA3161COLLECTED & RELEASED BY '~DATE IE ITRNAROUNO TIME
7v y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2_
REC I - ~~~~~DATE TIME REUNCUISHED BY DATE TIMEf
RECORO RETURNED BY DATE TWE
SNI)PPW NUMBER: ?H~ -3 g iDtSTIhBU~rflJ: M41E - PROJECT RI.E/ CANARY - LAS RECEIT /PM~ - DAIA ?MNAGa4B6r I GOfLDENROD - FIELD
_JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.(4 7 5 o3 -JE300 B STREET. SUITE = MNCHRAGE. ALASK.A 9950-5922FElTELEPHONE (907) 5C33 FAX (9710563-3320 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDUSE A BALLPOINT PEN, BLACK INK. AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
P&OJECT NAME: (ALA LUMIYLM &R 1 5W ISc.,-ePROJECT NUMBER: 'ii uins L"'S I Wuk Sit VIWES CODS: SUBCONTRACT I .. NM.4~ ~a-t.
1~~ coa~~~cuowt~~~~ 4v . Arhi b A tc e. 7I-3 2-'6
SAI lE I K- - EKlLo,; c - sl .. v&I.C2< Wel-AIAAL&E
lo c Ing '.C-AA *.. ~ oua~I _ C M _ _A U
C~ __j- e0 7 -c m -q_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
COMMENTS' I
COLTTED & LEASED B~YTUNRNDim
RECEIVED BYE ELNQISEDB DATE TIME
REODRETURNED BY DATE "a____
D~simaullt WH~t - ROJECT /SHIPPIN NUMBER: H r3 ' Z 6D1A3.A PMU~4BET / G flS~iROD
_JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. Cbe417 •3we43W B STREET. SUITE 6W O4ORAGE. ALASKASOSO3-522CHIOFUSDYR ODmi EI.EP4O (907) 563-3322 FAX (9D7) 563-3320CHIOFUS DYROD
USE A BALLIPOINT PEN, BLACK INK. AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PROJECT NAME: LASORAORY NAME A ADDRESS.
WES CODE: SUBCONTRACT I D.0 .I 4No.14klle" VPl Itj4*;J
RON= ~ ~ o
~~ 4 t~hI~~fl'flAM~~ ~ ~~Q tcA
9?.&IE 8-Irv.
4-44 J59?6E I o r ,.1- __
COMMDENS: - -~( 4 P _ _COLUCTED& AEOYr LA11gb gr~TM REUOUN4D nYDAE IM
FREC-ORD RETURNED BY DATE TE
SHIPPIING NUMBER:
D4STIBThIuNa WMIE - PROJECT FILE I CANARY- LAS RECEIPT PMfl - DMAIAM ARAEaiEVT U 0 0 00 (2 0
ft ~JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.JAE 4300 B STREET. SUITE 600 ANCORAAGE. ALASKlA 99eW5922 t47,70053oit: T~mOJEw)Scan FAX~7)5C3320CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDUSE A BALLPOINT PEN. BL.ACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
7 CT NAME: LBRTY AE& ADDrES1:
PROJECT NUMBER:OI t -A Stt
11 ~~WES COOE: SUBCONTRACT I 0.0. NM.
A ~~raa P3~SA M P~~~~~~~~~~~~t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S2 Sal -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
-, ra 0loa 6 fc
-i1 'psci Il C6 rwi.S 1C, cm S14 ct wb.,_
I B~~k IIIt,_rAAc3si ~~~- G~~- -
J~~l I Z I C__ C~AA Se _ _
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,
COLLECTED & RELEASED011 j DAT TIEIUNAROUND TIME r
RECEIVED I REuNouIsNED BY DATE lIME
RECORD RETURNED BY DATE TME
L SIPN UBR
DISTFhBUT1Q: WI4IE -PRO.JECT FILE /CANARf LAB RECEIT /PMC - DATA MAAG&ABENT IGoQDENIROO - FIED-. 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ift
A 9700,530 *Z- I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
__JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.liETELEPHKt4E (907) 563-3l22 FAX (W07) 563-3320CHIOFUSDYROM
USE A BALLPOINT PEN. BLACK INK. AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PROJECT NAME: LAJORAJORY NAME & ADDhESS.t
PRJCT NUMBJF wit Ti6; S:,- A
WBS CODE: SUBCONTRACT I 0.0. NM~ -,~Lkh.0 l41 e
-115 71 f AA-1- -siss
CA~~~C
s _t C CJAA __ __,,,__ __
9-+ r_ _ < ctr I_ _
ca -
I ?1 n•-A t CAAe~r ___
17 -4 rAA
COMMENTS:c ~
-- wSHIPPIN NUMER:
DIolmauna:WTE-POCTAEICN f- B CET/PE-0APMA vIJ GO BO -FEL
4 a, p~~~~~~002
IIJACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.4300 8 STREET. SUITE 600ANOCP4AGE, ALASKA 99503-5922 O
UtE TELEPNONE (9D7) 563.3322 FAX (907) 563*3320 CHAIN OFCUSTODY REOR
USE A BALLIPOINT PEN, BLACK INK, AND PRESS FIRMLY. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ON THE BACK
PROJECT NAME: LSOOYNM DlD
PROJECT NUBER: -
was co SUBCONTRACT I(0.0. NM. -k32 mm.. IrrecC. 2 Lf
co~~~~ ojS4 i.EUE.h
t-tl ~~CsA44t4 .L 84er& + "
S i S~~ b C V A _ _ K ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A_ _ _
_ _3_i _ c , 3 I
asq ____ _ CM ___ __CM
4. Atp .A' i~.~VJ e16t A) 12cotrresscommo£c
(ole SS633Z et r A 1d%wi't, I t S-3-32r a AA6rrre
EDEiaSEDDATE TIME TURNRUDTM-OLLECTED ByEASED BY
RE *DATE -rREJw~sE Y' DATE TIME
RECORD RETURNED BY DATE ~~~SHIPPING NUMBER'
01STR19UTION: WHITE PROJECT FILE ICANARY - LAB flECEIPT PIPNK DAIA MANAGEMENT / GOLDENROD FIELD
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc, Work order: A970053o
Project: Eielson Indoor Firing Range (AOC 32)/05-M300-196-OO18 DO# 7
Cooler received on: -7/16/97 and opened on 7/16/97- by Meghan Kennish
Yes No N/A1 Were custody seals on outside of cooler? 5
If yes, how many and where? 1 In Front
Were signature and date correct? 0 531`2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? [X 03 0
3 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? 5R 1 5
4 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? O 31
5 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? C3 0 ~ 0
6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? [I~ 03 0
7 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? 0 0 MI
S Temperature of cooler upon receipt 2.8 &_Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: Samples JE97EIE100CM through JE97EIEI 3IUS were
received in 16 oz, clear wide mouth jars, rather than the S oz stated on the chain of custody.
Sample JIE97EIE13lIUS will be analyzed for TCLP RCRA metals per Gloria Beckman, 7/17/97.
_______ _______ Yes No Sample I.D. _ Rage Vol.
pH Reagent _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
12 NaOH ______ ___
2 HN 0% _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
2 H2 S0 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yes =all samples OK _________
No Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments:
_____________________________________ _____________ J
r ~~~~~~~~COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group Service Request No.: K9705076Project: Eielson Firing Range Date Received: 7/18/97Sample Matrix: Soil, Water
Li ~~~~~~~~~CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.(CAS). This report contains analytical results for sample(s) designated for Tier 11A data deliverables. WhenI ~ ~~appropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Surrogate recoveries havebeen reported for all applicable organic analyses. Additional quality control analyses reported herein include:Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS) and Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).
I ~~~All EPA recommended holding times have been met for analyses in this sample delivery group.
I ~~~The following difficulties were experienced during analysis of this batch:The 8260 surrogate recovery in sample JE97E I E 1 36US was outside normal CAS control limits because of suspectedmatrix interference. The sample was re-analyzed, and again produced results outside control limits. The results of thej ~~~original analysis are reported.
The 8260 soil Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS) recoveries of several analytes were outside the normalGAS co ntrol limits because of matrix interferences caused by excessive levels of Naphthalene. No further corrective
action was taken.
The 8260 soil Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS) recovery of Naphthalene was not calculated. 'TheI ~ ~~analyte concentration in the sample was significantly higher than the added spike concentration, preventing accurateevaluation of the spike recovery.
Approved by Date_ 68/il ? 00 00
IC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
U. 0
all~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U0 _
U)~~~~~~~~~)e
In~ ~ ~ ~
US d~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U
z 49L
I I\?jOIR -UNW4Oc
O'd ~ ~ ~ 413>
0uz
Z,-~~~ ~ ~ U.'
uiwg cn ~
0 'C.'4
o
7.
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.Cooler Receipt and Preservation From
Client: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Work order: A9700533Project: Ejelson Firing RangeCooler receivedobn: 7/18/97 and-opened on 7/18/97 by Chris Ezell
nc NLA1 Were custody seals on outside of cooler? x o o
If yes, how many and where? 2 f&bWere signature and date correct? x o o
2 Were custody papers properly filled out (ink, signed, etc .... )? x o o3 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc .... )? x o o
- ~~ ~~~4 Were all bottle labels correct (analysis, preservation, etc .... )? x o o5 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? x o o6 Were correct bottles used for test indicated? x o o7 Were VQA vials checked for absence of air bubbles, and noted? x o a8 .Temperature of cooler upon receipt 4.8 Degrees C
Explain any discrepancies: ____________________________
_______ ~Yes No Sample I.D. Reage Vol.
-pH Reagent x12 NaOH x2 HNO3 X
2 H2S04 x
* ~~Yes = all samples OK __ __________
No = Samples were preserved at lab as listed
Comments:
a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
000 026
!000
r - -~~~~~~~~-LLA~ ~ ~ ~ N~rcc~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
w fa4$!
w ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A-~~~~~~~ol4
,ago~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
rev
LL,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L
u~~~~~~~~~wa~~~~~~~~~~~
JJL-2~~/-97 TH 5:~~ PM t 36C 635 1068~
-. -- ---.- ---- In aaoV *~.CAS Anchorage 0Oo6
Columbia Analytical Services Inc.-n ~~~~~~~~~~COOle IReceipt And Preservation Porn,Proiect/Cljen± CpaScWokOd
Cooler received onbt and opened on- J1_. by _________
Were custody seals on outside ofmoa!rg2f ytm how many and whar Q 4-~2. Were signature & date correct? N
3. Were wt adPa Propmpcdy filled out (* ind, ive tc)? N
4. Did all bozdes arnive in goad condition (unbroka)? NOW e r e a ~ b o z d c l~ w m ~ s c . ~ * U~ P r e s e r a tio n , e tc) ? N
6. Did all bottle labels and tags agree with utd aeg NOWere VOA vials checked far abserre of air bubbles and noted if s? NO
9. Did the botties origj-natc from C-AS/Kels or a bmanch Laboratory? NO10. Chdin-OfOstcody idezztfficrjion nmmberN
Tepraue fcolt~)upon zrerept: 1-r.'7 ~~Temperature i3Wic
-T.,.
LiEpan n sreavc No$ No; No~ NoD0 No r
YES NO Sample ID. R a~ Vol.Added
NO=.S lawPRereada
p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tsea m ray )fc vd o D
JUL-22-37 TUS 5:0 Phi 136056351058
000028
Ii
r
*1'
I
APPENDIX C
FIRING RANGE SAND DISPOSITION DOCUMENTATION
1'
I
i
I
la003
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEPAC1FIC MIR FORCES
1'2 2 'Selea
MEMORANDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)ATTENTION: MS. MARY JANE NEARMvANOffice of Environmental Cleanup Unit 441200 Sixth Ave ECL- 113Seattle WA 98101-3180
FROM; 354 CBS/cc2258 Central Ave StelOCEielson APE AK 99702-2299
SUBJECT; Transmitta Letter for Cleanup Level Acceptance at the Indoor Firing Range(Building 2204)
1. I am writing this transmittal letter in response to your conversation with Mr. Jim Me Millan,354 CBS/CEVR, on 8 J'an 98, regarding your deparirnents verbal acceptance of Building 2204,Indoor Firing Range cleanup levels of lead-contaminated sands. Work was completed this pastfield season by Jacobs Engineering Group/Brice Environmental Services Corporation. In theStatement of Work, a target rernediation cleanup goal of 1 00 microgranis/squar foot waschosen. This residential lead cleanup level is designed to primarily protect young children whoplay on floors. The level is based on US Department of Housing and Urban Development's(HUD) 1991 residential cleanup standards. US Department of Housing and Urban Developmentalso established additional cleanup levels for interior window sills of 500 rnicrogramis/squarfoot, and a window trough, exterior concrete/rough surface level of 800 micrograms/square foot.Although the target cleanup level wasn't attained in all sample results, the results were below thesecond and third higher levels, and well within an acceptable range for the rough surfacescleaned. The basement area is an isolated area without a ventilation/air system, so there wouldbe no movement of basement air into any oilier portion of the building.
2. Based on the achieved cleanup levels, anticipated long range usage of that basement facility(archery range), the fact that no inside air is exhausted into the remainder of the building, andverbal acceptance from both the EPA and the Alaska Department of Environmentai* ~~Conservation; Eielson AFB accepts the current cleanup standard and will convey the facilityback to our real property officer for disposition.
SAU L WUU15
12'/12'/97 U9L50 IUO7 452 5018 BRICE INC. -tJACOBS ENGINEERI I4oo3/00312/12-97 FRI 08:51 FAl 19073773367 CEV c .000 2
E)-/ei'e
State of LouisianaDepartment of Environmental Quality K1
fla OVEIRtNFOT R. J5. DALE GIVF.%'s
GOVERNOR A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ECRETAR'r
Rcurn ROCC eitkquestedZ 012 944 686
Dlecember 10, 1997
Mr. Jim McMillanBielson Air Porce BaseFairbanks, AK 99702-2299
RE: Lead Connminated SandSchuylkill ManiaLADOOS8 184 137
Deax Mr. McMillan:
The Louisiana Deparmnent of(Enviro enmtnl Qua lity, Hazardous WseDvso LE-w)Mconideed ourreqestforinfrmaIon regarding rho ability of The Schuylkill Metals Corporationfacility, located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to accept sand conlrtiagbld with leadi bullets. This sand,approximately 99 largo bags, was genextmod from the cleanup of a forme fig raC. Schuylkcill isapermined facility and may accept such materials. AS the generator, YOU ane required to properlycharacterize this weane and ship it accordingly. lIfthe material is a hazardous waste it must carry thecode for the constituent~s) responsible for that classilicagion e.g. DO0R for lead. The proper handling
code (recycling) should be included on the manifest.
Should you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Mr. Mike Miller atC504) 765-0272.
Sincerely,
esamC'Aat. ~
James H. Brent, Pk.DAdministrawr P0a:.fl. Fax Note 7671 i
OPPICE OF SOLID ANDOHAZARDOOUS WASTE HAZARDOUS5WASTE DIvISIcN P.0 Boxz8317?aBATONROUGE. LOUJISIANA 70S56.:176
TELEPRONE jWO) 765-03a5 FAX I5ozi 76550617
SN CA~I Wa vs-,
State of LouisianaDepartment of Environmental Quality
Edwin' W. Edwards Kai David U4flo.Governor September 30, 1993 Secretary
Mr. Glen E. HasseVice-Presidentschuylkill Metals corporationpost office BOX 74040Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70874
RE: Schuylk~ll metals corporationLAD008184137Final Operating PermitPermit Nuzber LAD008184137-OP-1
Dear Mr. Hasse;
This letter serves as notification of Secretary -Kai D.Midboe'Is f inal decision to issue a hazardous waste operating permitto Schuylkill Metals Corporation located in Baton Roug'e, East EatonRouge Parish, Louisiana. The effective date of tbe final permnit isNovember 1, 1993. This permit will expire an November i, 2003.
Responses to all comments received during the comment periodcan be f ound at the end of the permit in the ResponsivenessSummary.
in accordance with La. RLS. 3012024, the applicant may requestan adjudicatory hearing within thirty (30) days from date ofservice or any person aggrieved by a final decision or order of theSecretary may appeal to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, if amotion for appeal is filed with the Secretary within thirty (30)days after thet final decision or order is served upon theRespondent. only the specified provisions appealed will besuspended pending an adjudicatory hearing. Al]1 other provisions ofthis permit will become effective on the specified date.
OFFIC: J;;,L!O A.N0 HAZARDOUS WASTE, HAZAPDOUS WASAh DIVISION P.O. BOX 82178 8AC[ON RCUG6. LOUISIANA )0b44.21 78
TELEPHONE(504I7166-0355 PAX (504) 765-0617
Schuylkill PermitPago Two
If you have any questions regarding this action, pleasecontact Mr. Scott Guilliams at (504) 765-0272. Thank you for yourattention to this matter..
Assis at Secretary
GAM/fl/j~g
Enclosure
c: Mr. William Gallagher, U.S. EPAMs. Maria Daniel, U.S. EPAMs. Ann Zimmerman, U.S. EPA
WUXISrANA DEPARTMEfNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALrrY
HAZARDOUS WASTE IS) FACILIT
OPERATDIG PERMIT
pma4JrrEE Schyirviill Metals Cororatiop
nLSMIT NU3SUER LAD008I84137-OP-1
FACILIY West End of Brookiawn DriveLOCATION: Baton Route._Louisi-ana 70807
This permit is issued to the permittee by the Louisiana Deoarizuent of EnvironmentalQuality CLEQ) and the United States Environmaental Protection Agency (USEPA) underthe authority of the Louisiana Hazardous Waste Conral Law R.S. 30:2171 et seq., and theregulations adopted thereunder and by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency underthe authority of the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to RCRA CHWA) toSchuykikll Metals Corporation, (hereafter called the permittee), to operate a hazardouswaste treatment and storage CM51) facility located at Baton Rouge, Louisianat, at latitude3a0 35'008" and longitude 31' 14140M.
The permittee must comply with ail terms and conditions of this permit. This permitconsists of the conditions contained herein and the applicable regulations as specified in this
* ~permit. Applicable regulations are those which are in effect on the date of issuance of thispermit.
This permit is based on the assumption that the information provided to LDEQ by thepermittee is accurat. Further, this permit is based in part on the provisions of Sections206, 212, and 224 of the HSWA of 1984, which modify Sections 3004 and 3005 of RCRA.In particular, Section 206 requires corrective action far all releases of hazardous waste orconstituents from any solid waste management unit at a treatment, storage or disposalfacility seeking a p&rmit, regardless of the time at which waste was placed in such wnilt.
7 ~Section 21.2 provides authority to review and modify the permit at any lime. Anyinaccuracies found in the submitted information way be grounds for the termination,modifiation or revocation and reissuance of this permit (-see LAC 33:V-323) and potentia
* ~enforcement action- The permittee must Inform the administrative authority of anydeviation from~ or changes in the information in the applicatian which would affect thePermittee's ability to comply with the applicable regulations or permit conditions.
his permit is effective as of November 1 .199l and shall remain" in effct222n~p~npr 9 n l~,unless revoked and reism ed, modified or terminated In accordance I
kb LAC 33:V.705 of the Louisiana~ Hazardous Waste Regulations.
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 ~~~~ ~ ~ *
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEPACIFIC AIR FORCES
I g F,2:
MEMORANDUM FOR LOUTISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYATTENTION: MR. MIK.E MILLEROffice of Waste ServicesH-azardous Waste DivisionP 0 Box 8278Baton Rouge LA 90884-2178
FROM: 354 CES/CE-22258 Central Ave Ste 100Eielson AFB AK, 99702-2299
SUBJECT: Transmittal Letter for Movement/Transportation of Firing Range Sands
1. I am writing this transmittal letter in response to your conversation with Mr. Jum Mc Millan
on 5 Dec 97, regarding your departments verbal okay to ship our firing range sands to the
Schuykill Metals Corporation (Exide smelter) in Baton Rouge, LA. These sands will be used as
a flux material for Schuykill's blast furnaces.
r 2. It is our intention to start loading the sands 8 Dec 97. We will have five van loads totaling
approximately 21 0,000 pounds. It is our understanding that the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality is forwarding an approval letter, upon directorate signature to Eielson
AFB, for your departments final approval authority in this matter. In lieu of receipt of this letter,
we plan to start shipping the first van load upon completion of loading, and one van load every
subsequent two weeks via Lyndon Transport (Fairbanks shipper).
L ~~3. Thank you for your coopcration and assistance in this matter. For fuither information orquestions, please contact Mr. Jim Mc Millan, 354 CES/CIEVR. 907-377-5209.
g LMllS 6113, RA
OPTIONAL FUHN4 99 (I-0f))
FAX TRANSMITTALIT
r 33 0 Fa.5 j 3NGN 75-0J1-.317-73d0 5092-101 GENERAL SEIRVICES ADMINIS AATION
-"f UJ.I ~l &U~i AJ Q09 DuavIn 't 1'N~- - ' JAC0Ub~' LiNkl.ti\t~l LVJ00 o 2 /0'97 FRI 02:44 PM EXIDE MIETALS GROUP FAX NO, 610 378 0514 P. 0I/O]
Novemnber 7,'1997.
Mr. Craig JonesBrice Environmental Servces Corporation3200 Shell StreetP. 0. Box 73S20Fairbanks, Alaska.,99707
Dear Craig:
Per our telephone copversatian, Excide Corporation wfill accept one -load ofrange sand every tw.o weeks at our Baton Rouge, Louisiana facility This. sand willbe used as a flux li ourbls rac.
S incerely,
T'HOMAS W. KERCHNERAssistant DirectorMetals:Group
645 Penn, Street Reading, PA 19601P.0.. Box 14205 Reading, PA 19612-420S
-- , - .-n±0z - I4. ** UALUUj _ t.ltKI 'C005/006lkAiJ.Vi I A JU .,Lj Lat JA(UD.~ L2%U.\LLRIN,\Uv
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEPACIFIC AIR FORCES
7CP"3,J997
MEMORANDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEFNCY REGION 7A1TTN: BILL GRESHAM
FROM: 354 CE.S/CC2258 Central Ave Ste 100Eielson AFB AK 99702.22 99
SUBJECT: Lead-Contamninated Sands fromn Indoor Firing Range, Building 2204. HielsonAir Force Base (Eielson)
I. Eieison will be shipping reused materials (firing range sands) to The Exide facility inybur region. An exctensive revjdw was conducted by the Air Force of thte variousalternatives regarding the remnoval and disposal of thre lead-bearing sand, consideringissues of cost, schedule, and liability. The findings determined the most effectiveapproach forthe project was to ship the sand to Exide Corporation's secondary sinelter hidarnhon14blloW., Mi~s'sori.' The material, which was determirid to cedhtain a silicacontent of 80 percent. would replace sands with a similar silica content normally requiredfor use as flux material during the lead-snmelting process.
2. One of our concerns surrounding trrnisporting the firing range sand to a smelter waswhether EPA would clasi$fy the material as ibithr i solid waste, or exempt from being asolid waste undcr 40 CPR 2612.2 The classification issue is importantL because or theexorbitaim cosis associated with hanzadous waste manifested Shipments versus bill orlading shipments from Alaska to the ILower 48. -3Bot Mary Jane Nearman and DaveBartus, EPA-Regioin 10U, assisted us in clarifying ibis issue. Our fiwa deECrIninat ion iNbased art 40 CFR 261.2 (e).(1) which specifies that materials are not solid waste wheni
.~~~theyxcan-be shown Lo-be~reeycled by being.: .
a:l "Uied oi feused a-s ingredierns .i~n:an industvial prdcess to make a prdduct. providcdthe materials ar-e not being reelaimed;" or
b. '~Usedtot-rcus-d as cffective substitumes forcorn~mdrc fi~L'pctts." (probc.Jc51)
3. It is our opinion, based on the silica content of the s11ooting range sand, thaL rht~mdterial qualifies under patt ii of te regulation. During the sirelting process a -.-lux.agerit" (sand) containing-a high percernage. orsilica must be used as part of' the Snottlingprocesk. This nLTerialnmtustbe Purchased by thcsnmelter asan itgredienrifor the sneltingprocess. if niot oxherwisc available. Many firing ranges are comoosed of clean; Washedsands contaninfg liTtle, if any finds in 6rder to niiniriiile dust, generation or rockl in order
*-to minimize ricochets; When hin'g range tands-are6omnpos&d'of. silica minerals:'silica.
UJS: 42 flVUI 43. auja DAIL¶EI~ 'JC~~E'I'~.~ 4LJU U6 006
comprises the bulk Of the mass of the material, thus making it an ide~J substitute for thccommercially available flux agent. Since the Eielson firing range sands contaiin a silicacontent matching the comxncrcial flux agent, according 1o040 CFR 261.2 Ce) (ii). we willnot require hazardous waste manifesting during shipment to the smelter facility.
4. Support fcr our interpretation that the Eielson firing range sand is exempt froni7hazardous waste manifesting requirements is enclosed in the form of correspondencefrom: (1) EPA Region 4; (2) the state of North Carolina; (3) the state of Washington.Depantment of ECOlu6; and C4) the state of Missouri, Department of Natural Resources.
S. We realize that regardless of the exempti ons in 40 CFR 261.2 (e). the firing ranigesands still must be packaged compliant with DOT regulations governiing dry solids andour transport liability minimized. As suciL we are requiring the sands be loaded intosupersacks With A precautionary required inner liner. Furthermore, we -are also requiringthat the supersacks be shipped in closed truck trailers only. Should you heave anyquestions concerning the transportation of the firing range sands from Eielson. pleasecontact Mr. Mike Raabe, Chief, Installation Restoration Program, (907) 377-1164.
Attachments:1. Lrr,l16 Mar 942. Lu:'29 Mar 95
3.Lf, 15 Jan 974: LTr,-7 Dec 93-
cc:Mfizy .Iane.Nearman, EPA Region 10Dave Bartus. -EPA Region -10.Ron Short, ADECRobin'Moshier. Eiicsoni AFBM1ike R~aabe, Rielson AFB
*1I
t
r
)
APPENDIX Dr
WASTE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTATION
t
S
5-
EXIDE CRORTO
* ~~Thursd ', September.10. 1998
Craig Jonet;Brice Env~iron~mental. Services Corporation3200 ShIh11tfeet
Fsi nwA 907-3820
-This IetW ~WU confirm tht the range sand-rsc~iv@4 from Eielson AFB was
succsis~lty':sc ted it oyr Baton.Roug*, L.A smelter: if atj ame say questions orconern. lease do atesitate to give me scan. Axl.
Sincemel.:p es do'
RBERTF. JORDARawMaerilsManiagr
645 Pen St. eading1 PA¶90
ZO/ZO'd WV EV:BO OHI 96-01-d3S
ha -. *..~~ ------- ---- Y.. LJV.
B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Home oflke.
320 hel trelNovember 12. 1997Pairbanks, AK
gg707-352c0lol (.,07) 456-1955
fax (907) A5P-S0lo Ms. Kim KearneyJacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
554Roo 3' 4300 B Street, Suite 600Ro. Box 76 Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ringoes. NJ O8&551Tel [908) 806-3655
tax(98)80-393 RE: Bill or Lading Information and Package Labeling
e-ma121: Dear Kim:b@f oarp
opoarnl~crPrior to loading and transporting the Eielson sands from Alaska to Baton Rouge,Louisiana, we need to address information that will go on the bill of lading and on thepackages of sand. I have researched this and enclose my findings andrecommendations. Jacobs must provide final approval, so I recommend that atransportation specialist within your group review my findings as quickly as possiblein order to avoid any delay associated with the disposition of the material.
The silica sand is not a hazardous waste because the material meets the provisions ofI40 CFR 261.2 (e) (ii). Consequently, the Hazardous Waste Manifest Requirements ofthe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) specified in 40 CFR Part 262 do norapply.
49 CFR 172.101, Department of Transportation regulations stipulate package labelingand nomenclature forthe bill of lading. Part 172.1 01, Table 1. - Hazardous SubstancesOther Th$n Radionuclide's was reviewed and lead identified on page 240. The tablespecifies that Lead has a reportable quantity (RQ) of 10 pounds (lb.) per package. Thefootnote states that the RQ for this hazardous substance is limited to those pieces ofthe metal having a diameter smaller than 100 micrometers (.004 inches orapproximately 140 mesh).
According la the DOT, a hazardous substance means a material including its mixtures andSolutLiouns that. I) are lIIsted in Pant 172. 101L (2) is in a quantity in one package w hi chequals or exceeds the reportable quantity (RQ) l isted in Pant 172. 101, and, ,(3) when in amixture or.solution exceeds the concentration corresponding to the RQ of the material.
Using high-end treatability study results, lead concentrations were determined to beapproximately 80,370 mglkg for the bullet trap. sand and 3.865 mgg for the range floorsand. Approximately 23 percent of the material recovered from the range was from thetrap irea and 77 percent was from the range floor area. The material from each area wasplaced into supersacks. Upon completion of the removal action, sands were re-distributed because the weight limit for some of the supersacks was exceeded. Uponproject completion 99 supersacks were filled, with an average weight of 2.083 pounds.-
In order to determine if the packages contain material meeting the hazardous substancedesignation listed above, the lead concentration and material quantity from each area wasweight averaged using the treatability study and quantity information listed above. Theaverage quantity of lead was determined to be approximately 47.9 pounds per supersack.
Although the quantity is approximately 47.9 lbs./package, treatability study results haveshown that virtually all of the lead is greater than .004 inc hes in diameter (140 mesh).The treatability study did not examine the minus 140 mesh fraction, however the minus200 mesh was analyzed for rotal lead. The minus 200 mesh fraction was dletermnined to be1.62 percent of the bullet trap sand gradation and contain 69,5316 mg/kg lead, while therange floor sand contained 1.91 percent minus 200 containing 3,750 6 mg/kg leadExtrapolating this data to the bulk soil results in an avenage minus 200 mesh leadcontribution of 0.66 pounds per package. It is not possible for the minus 140 by 200mesh fraction to contain an additional 9.34 pounds of lead, hence the material does notmeet the DOT hazardous substance designation.
If the material had met DOT's definition of a hazardous substance, the following wouldhave been required for the Bill of Lading:
Hazard Class 9UN # 3077
Plackaging Group IllEnvironmentally Hazardous Substance, Solid (N.O.S.) Lead
Each package would have had to be labeled as follows:
UN #3077
Environmentally Hazardous Substance, Solid (N.O.S.) Lead
Because the material does not meet the DOT definition of a hazardous substance, the billof lading only needs to include a description of The material. The material will bedescribed as follows:
"Silica Sand"
Each supersack will be labeled the same.
Sincerely,
Caig Jones
Jniform Straight Bill L3ND3NM) Lading THEr ALL MODEL CAHRIER =MI
SPOPPER'S COPy (LT1A)
Consignee pipo ay t 1a 1On Conoc oni D.'Jy smpl the emWs '0.0.0; must oppwa btr Cons"e' FRPYENSNDFEG ILT
City & Stats ZipA~1 .N meStreet _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
City &State .Zip
Shipper Fl-AL&EVLfltenffrjAa ~S C tmmr BO- 8bO(NG 1 I charges are to be p~repaid write
s,,.e~~~~32CO ~~~Z.-// LA ~~~~~ ?'n ~~~S~~W or smamp here. -To Be Prepad'-
- City & Smt /zt.4 2NO. SNPPINGU~flS fotbo V Af&S 6Ptdi~afa~d~scnh ~ _____ _____ CHARGES
/ _ ¼ ~~tr/ s~~d 44db
4±zov ____~~~~~~~~~~~~~~QWA\~ A 0
REMIT C.O.D. TO:ADDRE$$
o Mk'I uuwA~ CHECK( SUc¶ou e.zud=,.4* omtWi. thu n sduww t..6* e*nJU
1-= w~ii' hego- Jw ~ IlY- UN=G 3*WCod La in advance betweien Oh f C-lI 9 ,- c.mr~ httgTh ~~eJ w MhnJ IN--~ J UV ~S0IY' 'as W ool dfA.y fldLTIA and benel1cial 0e410,ctrricf$I's ngt~Wcy I,,. i~~njsje. hi U. .enabr fiah~~ity win be Emoted LUth Ins lm of Th"Cm aVVW -. VW d* eo~ Value I PM MM~ Pon 0W 320.0.VO0 Par ctwrg
* I Actev~~~~~~~~~~~ S we nN~~~~~~~~~~m~~~n ~~(Si.ninu of Coni. no)
*s n w-MmaP hlsa. CARR-~ . -- 1(SL~ I. ER ~a mh at d1..~S-1 eb~ aa.r e .'~r4 . t ~ e. -h - te msC. w t g d ~ e ea ts a'- ., 7 Z. - l' e .i SSt r V W nno . ,.O~-- aS~ £54.i.V a-.d.&w ~ .- -. a e e .i..,Ym..e*,PER.w e DATEu.. .
tF & it Sand~.5..d - - ~ - V - . 0L V " e - an ay. rCe .% ~ - , A ~..d & .u
of 0s - -Nh64.. .taa0iht Wedr - bamQ-ia wb-hi. js yIas .-in UK,t ae - ga.
~~ Stee ~ - a, - ~~ A' . 0 e ~~ - ~ a . . t~~- - - a m - . -V - N - k~~~ C.0 .04 7
QI Ut.aINAL NULJNU I IAbLt IP D ?Uniform Straight Bill LNE 133530of Lading THE ALL MODE CARRIER
.
8tHiPPMfiS COPY (LTIA) 438241-Pride Qot'gotA/'o" ~~~~~TRAILER 2438241uiviimiiiuuu2
Consignee -~ se/t 2IIIllIIIIII5llIIIII2on eCol'C o DeirvetY sfIlrn21 tmean If, COD." Mint OP0gar blefrt. Conaign~e'g -FOR ~PAYMENT. SNDw FREI 14fl' SILL TO: ~JMarna-
city & state 4e3&A'•7I ~ Zp -
Street - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
City& Sitate__. ZIP
C h~~ p p e r 2 6 a V i t O s - A t P~~~~~ ~ C L A / • f l w n B O O K I N G S ~K c a rg es r t o b e p r e p a i d w r it eStreet I2Q4LI~~~~~~~s // s$ .&&c23C2~~~~~~~~5 or stamp here, 'To Be Prepfid-,
NO. SNPPNG LI?5 tPC I&tSrit"-N .bnau
tu~cy ~, RATE _ CHARIES
ZP /tt ___
... .... /f M419AL AA ST L______________ ________
~~iI-1 .. 0oA~~~~~~~~k~~n _Oe__-
REMIT~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ules re oinwac e~ M WallTAw I-
TrW tpob'e OWdIfOd V~Sb PUP@1Y a MWflY Wpacftfly S4400 LTIA Wi bansfbcW ow!,ne. carrier lsen Wblby U. w tbe-~Xa arlyWIO i*at m e fdpydfO~a" VA" S20.00 per pound by 1200000.00 pot d hqvq fincl 0 cuwgb.
ft1k~h W Xfltow d"Sn i- 8 f vC HPCdU PC~dfly *4- -cndi h om~ -~~bn6 .e~l..r - n - ktawCi Trnfwa`'; Of M* .yWy .u' uTm. o 0
ttis Column is ,t optcl~a flivimod of dOsgnajng hanraOus materials On bills of ading per Sectio 172.201 and 172.2O2ib) of, rhengj~azioos gontning U', Isbn,,otrjwo~nof suet, "nteals.
op Si he,,
H ILINAL 'JulV NtaUII Abls"MI
Jniform Straight Bill LNDEN C 02110)f Lading ~~~~~~~~THE ALL MOIDE CARRIER (CAPPJR USE ONLY) s
SHIPPER'S COPY (LTIA) -F- K
TRAILER -432538Consignee gLo,~ - 4.,ycv~ S~ffre~ri Iz s LiIUIBIIERUN IIOn Coliet on Delivory shIomerits. Lit latimr "CO.".. mtat a~ppar beoler Consignee's FOR PAYMENT, SEND NE.,. g GILL IVU.name or as otherwse proyidled in Itern AM. S". I.
City & State J-74nv t4 dcu 1 ( I- A zipStreet
- ~~~~JIIj~ - E?.'i~ S. v car Ciy& State - rpShipper C ijrBOOKING Is If charges are to be Prepaid write
Stee7;ct' £LS/Z.S'Aeoc6kac-raea or stamp here, "To Be Prepaid.-
NOSHPPIIMinsil 04.n'aus l" t ~ u*a ~sc ~ RATE CHARGEST / 4 'g t.-f..z P 5'*3220
* tczjeo/ ~~j £'e-4,rj Are-#3
ADDREMISSD O
_________________________________________ ________ __1`____________ Sub).ct~ wo S.c Ish 7. e wCACM. V this a Nf t N
Wit m.Wher th?, ole it. dcp'S Wif Valu. a~vPgc Mr '1%roqi W scate
mam'y"Io N a ~ cI 0M (wqW~y a hani OcMYkSc at"c bA h Actual Value $ OC-lO .w4t~ecI M Vsa asomy f in.,
$ per ______________($geawofConsignicor)
-J NT aoo s 0 t~iac~a. e.'0.0 C h~c SOy 544*~S 10 ~oii sS* 04. min - o t.fl . *.0Os
v.A-i --41- - 00144~1$,-4 4.n~tiCS - cr44 ~. - r~ OOM dsrt. w. 4hi~sm f*.~ - v...~ne , an.,. sin shemosses. ' wedon Wwhdw- wa q s..d W
SHIPPER ri e kyn.-~sc.. - CARRIER
PER DATE PER DQAT5 eA 0b)oit.Rqatcsgviigtersspdn
*Marl. with -X to des.Ignt= Hazardoc;s Material as delined In [he Dagorlm..,gl of Transportation A(Igtu"Iatso Gov0,hIegVtptltiq of Haznito Malaeroso. rTh ue M oCl$.Ct rviN,culrialt.
Qr.li5 ('fli 9*1W
'RIGINAL - NOT NEGOTIABLEC VFDEi.102 2Jniform Straight BillM OAf Lading THE ALL MODE CARRIER B
SHIPPER'S COPY (LTIA) 4TRAILER
on Collect on Dellvr Ihe'.tem.000"ms aear eforfe" consiee s FOR PAYMENT, SEND FRIEIGHT BILLT.nernia oreotws pwdd ltoman 450. Sao. I.
A ~ ~~~~~ZpName Sr/t A7-&aM?4~L&.-ke
Cityll~~~~~~~stateCty& SatlP 4
Street ?.ZCO a~~~~~cI'M~~~ AW~~y. 7roae
city & SIU~~~~~~~~~tI ~~~A~~k A t Zip 4 ro7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Zi
Shipper~~~~~~z~~ ~ tsNG- bp~~ srs~ ~ 0t% Cd M. S~ae~ai oqnin~e~ ci~fl - uuA~ja~~j '~ N-s M~hSf chrATes CrHtAb rGESadwl
Streetcr £+.12 oratemtrerrzToBeprpad'~~~~~zp1
.- ~~~~~~~~A - I
CY: J~qF357h r4czzfl' OI7*.4 4 'e-, rt/f i - 9
co,4 -*14 FA ic'Q Ar 4 c$
REMIT C.O.D. TOtADORESS
(3 ACCM 00W. C,,,N *9 th ws~ 7i c6SNNN, .'t , hagot
NO~TE; tr Wh tol I, dwafiNO4 t, *OW, Wt mrOqars to mm wabd.
lotM *rw N o woniwnd yk tfDtI ftWO*IYaM ytoSctUSl Value S TMatti *h r we m di00v o
$ pe __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _(ignauxe Cl Comiignor)-v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,,ovtaouN,
m~eawn - - -es a~k no it-a- - ba Ut- - t Ldw~g -* 'y ..abtSO anit ii M - ~ Q-i5 Unat- L~iA~iaJ. -6S*4a bit t~e - .VC t taW ba s ON .Ovwae -, gNON.N nw y -ww -sem, i. W.uNS -. ,y
- ai - d... 5~eseets."o45 - .4CS -. N51fUA.5 rta) fitM,. UtC hww t a . S~S Upe ~ff S. hi- 5 .IN ona
SHIPPER CARRIER ~
PER D~~~~~~~~~~~~~lI ~~~~~~Pon DATE
this ~~i IgSectionrdO2l201awnul 172of2n2da) of bhnrregulationsr governing theztrertis Mawrtals
OPtS5 (ivti) som
1 ~~~~~~ Bill ~~~~~~~~~~NDW1072111
of Lading THE ALL MODE CARRIER (CRIRJ NYSHIPPeRIS COPY TA)-IfU11111
Consignee Conlgee O METSED RiiHTBIL O
Street 2 4141c, 13.-os~~~~~~~~~~ktree
-. j-~~~e- (,A' 0 A'meedat S~~~~~~rtdc ~City & SiaiJSCo ZipShipper tver 9 . BOKIG If charges are to be prepaid write
StreetXaczp rc - tP.,je Or Stamp here, "To BO Prepaid.'
p City& State P77=
W',.StWVGr UmTS ~ 49. W'C ~ See.S a.- Me-,N,
.04l 0 Cme.. RATE CHARGES
eXfrt 4taWd 5I /CA~
t%. -DcMAI.,/txa
CXW\ ~WAN ~\smn: k%\.
* REMIT C.O.O. TO:ADDRESS c~
~~~ ~~~~~. ~~~~~~ - O~~~~~~CACCVPn COMPANY C.Onie SU*CU05I*IW 7 0 Coml, co , n. 's srdvamen,,
the 2,1'.I Ofa Vi or jAA (W' fl. b1 N*Y=cMy Sumb b'y ih, Actual Value $ h S4 M ~ r~r fTi
(Siginatur, of Consigeeo)
RfMM #wO -0'C O tul le t we awca aea O-t'd ytdttaes onin-mv osmiy T. s aca.n 'q' an
0n Teico flT adelrmiat, iM0 KS - in s mate. TR' t,. - t 45 .9,' nyP -ATS.n -1 1 -101 u filerall o.The Le-, ofS1 psuchy naton'..talse . .It -htS 11f S5 rim onnk'Bills~ Of la ingPe -" 0 12.201 an..s. . i7.2t2b ) ofW I h. ml - aN.. - gnifn t th--e -ranste..,.
Trio C S -~~ - -V ~ C' ~ - - - I. 'S 5' .a0 'qJSM. ttW,. Omt-mS ofM T
w io.
3ZC'ThPick-up Check List HAZMAT
Person Contacted: CI4I L *i> ~/ )) P hone #: 6 U C-Generaton p oint: 6cW c~cI cq
Work Order 4 MXS Bldg. 4 _ ______ Sqd.I Shop ------
First time pick-up?-tiiJ-No If not, is MSDS or lab sample available? CieuiNo
Remarks
Date/time completed 11066 17 By? (print name) /en,/
(signature)
Any discrepancies noted during pick-up?/
document container accumulation description drum trur t-ur4 ~~sequence number start dtie (noun) size Wt.
C 114 flt4T1PlCXUP.00C I6JLINE 94
APPENDIX E
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
LI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A
i
I
j Cl~~~~~~~~
C4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 .LEC
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0o
- ~~~~~PROJECT DISTRIBUTION - TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS* ir ~~~~~~~~~T.O. #07 - EIELSON AOC 32U ~ ~~~~~~~CONTRACT # DACA-85-95-D-0018
Serial No.: -
Subject: .Eielson Indoor Firing Range Remedial DATE: 25 November 1998Action Report FROM: Mandy Pogany
Doc. Control No.: AKT-J07-05M307-J22-0002 COMPANY: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.-
I. U.S. Army Engineer District Alaska (TERC Office) VII. Jacobs Engineering Group
TERC Original Chris Williams
Mike Redmond, Resident Engineer - CEPOA-CO-TC Margaret Moore
Pat Roth, Site Leader - CEPOA-CO-TC Gloria Beckman
W Vicki Bright, Budget Analyst -CEPOA-CO-TC E ZMandy Wermers
Health & SafetyII. U.S. Army Engineer District Alaska (District Offices)
WMike Flaherty - CEPOA-CT-CO-M
WRon Toombs - CEPOA-PM-E-W
Kathleen Prentki - CEPOA-CO-CAB FI North Wind Environmental
W ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~John SimpsonIll. U.S. Army Engineer District Alaska (FRO) Accounting (V. Russo)
W Rolf Ness CEPOA-CO-FR-Q-C ContractsIV. 354 CES/CEVR Project Controls
Jim McMillan I Document Control
Mike Ruabe
V. Environmental Protection Agency
Z ZMary Jane Nearman
VI. Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation
IRonan Short
Action Required: Ih.JO
Suspense:
Signature: Date: 25 November 1998M"~ a~d d on
Project Manager
Receipt Date:Signature: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
G:\OOCCTPt\TERC\flISTREffiIAREVISED\TECHNICA\307TECH DOC11/24/98,8.43 AM
Related Documents
