IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 1 cs Program to prepare / in parallel to ITER establish the physics base for ITER (and DEMO) areas of ITER preparation with unique features: dation of the standard scenario ponents for wall and divertor, ontrol with ECCD (variable frequency) versatility of heating s ailoring and disruption mitigation pellet and killer gas in tion of 'Advanced' modes beyond standard scenario oved H-mode (ITER Hybrid scenario) pulse length/current dif relevant digital CODAC system luence on ITER component design - in close collaboration within EU fusion program - supported by strong theory program at IPP - experiments on ASDEX Upgrade and JET Otto Gruber, ASDEX Upgrade Team Report on ASDEX Upgrade EURATOM Association
15
Embed
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 20061 AUG Physics Program to prepare / in parallel to ITER Aim is to establish the physics base for ITER.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 1
AUG Physics Program to prepare / in parallel to ITER
Aim is to establish the physics base for ITER (and DEMO)
Two main areas of ITER preparation with unique features:
Consolidation of the standard scenario - W components for wall and divertor, - MHD control with ECCD (variable frequency) versatility of heating systems - ELM tailoring and disruption mitigation pellet and killer gas injection
Exploration of 'Advanced' modes beyond standard scenario - Improved H-mode (ITER Hybrid scenario) pulse length/current diffusion time - ITER relevant digital CODAC system
Direct influence on ITER component design
Strategy: - in close collaboration within EU fusion program - supported by strong theory program at IPP - experiments on ASDEX Upgrade and JET
Otto Gruber, ASDEX Upgrade Team
Report on ASDEX UpgradeEURATOM Association
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 2
Hardware extensions in 2005:- towards a C-free first wall all LFS limiters (water cooled) & roof baffle with thin W coating
- 2 steerable ECRH mirrors (movement tested)- first two-frequency gyrotron: leak after commissioning (1 MW / 10 s / 105 & 140 GHz)
guard/
ICRHlimiter
aux.limiter
hor.plate
lower PSL
roofbaffle
2006/2007(planned)
W-coating startingwith campaign
2003/2004
2004/2005
2005/2006
guard/
ICRHlimiter
aux.limiter
hor.plate
lower PSL
roofbaffle
2006/2007(planned)
W-coating startingwith campaign
2003/2004
2004/2005
2005/2006
AUG operation 2006
Operation till 27 April: about 1/3 of program executed
EZ4 damaged (loss of electrical supply for control, no braking)
new CODAC commissioned - reduced cycle time <1.5ms - extended regime recognition & performance control - real-time diagnostics replaces CAMACs)
Significant overlap with W7-X CODAC (joint IPP project XDV)
Pellet Injection Systems: - centrifuge (HFS launch capability, variable pellet size, frequency & velocity) - blower gun (optimized for decoupling ELM pacing and refuelling)
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 3
Technical incident with EZ4 at 27.04.06
flywheel EZ4construction 1986, power 220 MVA, total weight ca. 160 t
number of pulses est. 75.100, operated for est. 7.900 h
flywheel generator
- operation will be resumed after careful assessment by external experts- technical tests with EZ3 in July ?
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 4
AUG uses three flywheel generators as power/energy source EZ2 (1.45 GJ / 167 MVA): toroidal field EZ3 (500 MJ /144 MVA) + EZ4 (650MJ/220MVA): OH, pol.field, add. heating
Present settings for PF coils: reduced power and energy with EZ3 alone allow only 15 % of the last 2000 # (Ip<800 kA, Padd<5 MW, <5 s)
about 50% of the last 2000 # are still possible Ip=800 kA, 5-10 MW, 5 s Ip= 1 MA, 5-7.5 MW, 3-4 s at lower dens.& triang.
W program (highest priority in 2007) nearly without restriction full ELM and disruption control program restricted high- discharges at low * and *
strongly reduced NTM stabilization schemes
the planned short-term investigations can be done with only minor restrictions medium-term the full power/energy supply is needed for all relevant ITER
work
Operation with reduced generator capacity (EZ2, EZ3)
0
5
10
15
20
EZ
3 (k
A)
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2Ip(MA)
EZ3 > 11 kAEZ3 ≤ 11 kA
Limit: 11 kA
A.C. Sips, W. Suttrop
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 5
Influence of ECCD deposition width d on NTM stabilisation
narrow deposition d<W: - decisive is peak jCD I/d (maximal at tor = -5° /TORBEAM)
full stabilisation with dc ECCD at reduced P⇒ ECCD/PNBI
higher ⇒ N achievable at stabilisation broad deposition d > W: - reduces the stabilisation efficiency (experiment) - required current increases significantly for dc ECCD (theory) ⇒ modulated ECCD (at mode frequency / O-point injection) required for ITER
[M. Maraschek et al, PPCF, 2005]only partial dc stabilisation for d > Wdc stabilisation at ITER relevant conditions
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 6
Full stabilisation of (3,2) NTM with modulated ECCD (d>W)
ECCD modulated with phase from magn. signals with fmode < 30kHz reduced overall deposited ECCD power complete stabilisation at high N / <PECCD> ~ 4.0 MW-1
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 7
Combination of high power, flexible addititional heating, current and shaping capability, density operation up to Greenwald and long pulse length (> current diffusion time) allows unique exploration of advanced scenarios beyond ITER baseline Improved H-Mode in ITER allows Q>30 and / or pulselength above 1 h Improved H-Mode may allow even ‚steady state‘ in DEMO
Scenario development for ‚Improved H-Mode‘ (Hybrid mode)
4
open: <10E
closed: >10E
N
ITER
ITPA
i*
JET
DIII-DAUG
JT-60U
0
1
2
3
0 5e-3 1e-2 1.5e-2
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 8
Scenario development for ‚Improved H-Mode‘ (Hybrid mode)
early versus late heating
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 9
Scenario development for ‚Improved H-Mode‘ (Hybrid mode)
early versus late heating
pol
pol
Reich, Stober
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 10
(3,2) NTM stabilisation in improved H-mode (dc ECCD, d<W)
clear stabilisation with increasing / decreasing Bt ramp fishbones and sawteeth after stabilisation; good confinement H98-P=1.15 lowest achieved q95=2.9 for stabilised NTMs Maraschek, Stober
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 11
Fast particle losses caused by MHD activity
FILD spectrogram shows fast particle losses well correlated
with TAE activity (NBI, ICRH, ICRH beat waves)
- ICRH creates trapped fast particles
- vperp/v ~0.9,
energy up to several hundreds keV
- TAEs modify orbits of fast particles
Munoz, K. Sassenberg, PhD, Cork, Ireland
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 12
Fast particle losses caused by MHD activity
FILD spectrogram shows fast particle losses well correlated
with NTM activity
- slow MHD activity like NTM (~5-20 kHz, harmonics) induces fast particle losses
- decrease of losses observed when NTM is actively stabilized with ECCD- modulated NBI experiments allow for studying time scales of losses
Munoz, PhD
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 13
Main thrusts for AUG program 2007 w. full W coverage
Re-evaluation after 3 months of operation
I. W compatibility of ITER related scenarios - characterization of transition to a W machine - storage / release of noble gases - optimization of ICRH II. Extension of working space - radiatively cooled integrated scenarios - improved H-Mode (high low density)
III. Other ITER related physics investigations, compatible with above results and requirements
envisaged rel. weight(whole campaign)
priority
30%
20%
50%
Power / Energy Limits set by operation with EZ2/EZ3 only
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 14
Boundary conditions set by W-PFCs (to be refined):
- W concentration slowly increasing with coverage, saturation around 10-5 - reduced cW at relevant auxiliary heating power and densities
- carbon inventory decreasing
Needed for ITER compatible W concentration: density > 6e19/m³ (gas puff rate > 6e21/s) q-edge > 3.2 f(ELM) > 60 Hz ELM pacing dominant central heating Pheat< Pthreshold or Pheat> 2x Pthreshold
power/energy limits for upper divertor (5 MW 4s, 10MW 1s) monitoring of limiter & divertor glow (safety loops)
W concentration
line aveaged electron density
all dataq<3.5 andPICRH>1 MWq<3.5 andPICRH>1 MW (2005/06)
10-7
10-5
10-3
R. Neu, PSI06
IEA IA PolDiv ExCo-Meeting, Cadarache 28 June 2006 15