IDSVA Dissertation-Handbook 2012 Copy

7/26/2019 IDSVA Dissertation-Handbook 2012 Copy

1/23

Qualifying Exams &

Dissertation Handbook

Revised May 2012

130 Neal Street

Portland, Maine 04102

207-771-8887

www.idsva.org

!"#$%!"#$!$%$& ()* +),$)*-. #$%+! !" $/& 0!#%-. -*$#


2/23

IDSVA Qualifying Exams & Dissertation Handbook (Revised May 2012)

Page 2 of 14

MISSION STATEMENT

The mission of the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts is to operate a school

of graduate studies providing education in philosophy, aesthetics, art theory, and similardisciplines related to the visual arts. The mission includes the provision of doctoral

studies to holders of the MFA or the masters degree in a related field, the conferring ofPhD degrees, and otherwise providing education and training related to the arts.

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Traditionally the MFA has served as the terminal degree for studio artists. This degreehas trained studio artists in the skills necessary for successful art practice and has

prepared artists for teaching in college and university studio art programs. However, thereis a strong sense among todays artists and educators that training beyond the MFA and

similar degrees would benefit many artists, architects, curators, and creative scholars,

especially those who grapple with issues surrounding contemporary media and culture.IDSVAs pioneering curriculum---fusing distance learning with intensive residencies---allows working art professionals to pursue rigorous advanced scholarship without having

to interrupt or abandon their teaching careers, art practice, or other professionalresponsibilities.

LEARNING GOALS

Insofar as the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts offers to creative

practitioners a PhD in philosophy, aesthetics, and art theory, it addresses an importantopportunity for contemporary art and culture. The measure of this opportunity can be

summed up in terms of IDSVAs primary learning goals. These include the nourishmentand cultivation of:

- the ability to speak and write critically and philosophically about the relationship

between the history of ideas and art in general;

- the ability to teach university level courses on subjects dealing with the relation ofphilosophy and art---such as courses in aesthetics, art theory, and critical theory;

- the capacity to situate oneself in the history of ideas and culture in terms of ones

creative practice and/or field of inquiry;

- and lastly, IDSVAs overarching learning goal is to nourish and cultivate an ethosof inquiry that encourages creative thinkers to conceive new systems of

knowledge.


3/23


Page 3 of 14

Table of Contents

1. Conduct of the Written and Oral Qualifying Examination

2. Oral Examination Study Tips

3. Requirements applicable to Dissertations submitted for the degree of PhD

4. Dissertation for the PhD degree

5. Entry to examination and submission of Dissertation

6. Availability of Dissertations

7. Conduct of the Dissertation Defense

8. Notification of results of the Dissertation Defense

9. General Remarks

Appendices

A. Permission to Proceed to the Dissertation

B. Dissertation Registration Form

C. Title Page


4/23


Page 4 of 14

1. Conduct of the Written and Oral Qualifying Examinations

The Qualifying Examination incorporates two components, a Written and an Oral. TheWritten must be completed prior to sitting for the Oral examination.

1.1. Candidates successfully completing the Written Qualifying Examination shall:

(a) Submit a 5,000 8,000 words paper for examination. This paper shall:

Emerge from work done in the third year seminar;

Be submitted no later than two months prior to the beginning of oral exam;

Consist primarily of an introduction or first chapter of the Dissertation.

The Exam, as submitted, shall be formatted as follows:

Times New Roman

12-point double-spaced 10 point spacing after paragraphs

top and bottom margins 1 right & left margin 1.25

pages numbered in the bottom right corner

The preferred style guide is MLA, although Chicago Manual of Style is also acceptable.

The exam shall also include:

A final list of 15 titles central to the students research project (referred to in

1.2, a, ii, as Student Texts)

A one-page, double-spaced, thesis statement

A working bibliography (in addition to the students 15-title reading list)

Outline

Table of Contents (simplified from the outline to reflect only chapter headings

and approximate word counts)

(b) The paper submitted as the Written Qualifying Examination must consist of thecandidates own writing, based on his/her investigations;

(c) The paper must: initiate a project that will form a distinct contribution to theknowledge of the subject and afford evidence of originality by the discovery of new

facts and/or by the exercise of independent critical power, give a critical assessmentof the relevant literature, and in so doing, demonstrate objectivity, a deep and

synoptic understanding of the field of study, and the capacity for judgment in


5/23


Page 5 of 14

complex situations;

(d) The paper must be written in English and commensurate with the highest

standards of scholarly writing in the Humanities;

(e) Be of a standard to merit publication in whole or in part or in a revised form (for

example as an article in an academic journal).

1.2. Oral Exam

In addition to the written exam, and the attendant documents listed in section (a) above,each student will submit a list of the readings that comprised her/his particular Course of

Study at IDSVA. Specifically, that list will include all of the texts read in all of theseminars. Because syllabi change from year to year, and because some students take

leaves of absence which put them out of synch with their original cohort, it is essentialthat each student submit this list so that examiners ask questions that are appropriate to

that particular students program of study. To this list should be added fifteen StudentTexts as chosen by the candidate (in consultation with his/her Dissertation supervisor).

As indicated above these texts comprise the titles most central to the written exam andprojected thesis. The document as a whole is to be delivered to the students 904

instructor, along with the Written Qualifying Exam.

Candidates successfully completing the Oral Qualifying Examination shall:

(a) demonstrate a thorough familiarity with: i) all completed seminars and directedreadings, and: ii) fifteen Student Texts as chosen by the candidate (in consultation

with his/her Dissertation supervisor);

(b) demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the candidates Dissertation topic

and the key texts related to the topic;(c) demonstrate an integrated comprehension of the key theoretical positions relativeto the candidates Dissertation topic and explain the position to be represented by the

Dissertation.

1.3. Examiners will be appointed for each candidate in accordance with IDSVAs policyfor the appointment of examiners for the degree of PhD. At least one examiner for each

candidate must have experience as an examiner for a research degree awarded by a U.S.higher education institution. At least one examiner must be a member of the IDSVA core

faculty.

1.4. All matters relating to the Oral Qualifying Examination must be treated asconfidential. Examiners are not permitted to divulge the content of the examination toanyone other than the candidate or faculty and administrators of IDSVA.

1.5. After the Oral Qualifying Examination, a joint final report shall be prepared by the

examiners for submission to IDSVA. The joint final report will be released to candidatesfor their personal information.

1.6. Each joint final report of the examiners shall indicate whether the candidate has


6/23


Page 6 of 14

successfully met the requirements for completion of the Oral Qualifying Examination andshall include a statement of the examiners judgment of the candidates performance.

1.7. Examiners have four options in determining the result of the Written QualifyingExamination andan additional four options in determining the result of the Oral

Qualifying Examination as follows:

1.7.1 The Written Qualifying Examination:

a. If the Written Qualifying Examination fulfills the criteria (set out in 1.1 above),and the examiners are fully satisfied with the quality of the written work, the

examiners may pass the Written Qualifying Examination without amendment.

b. If the Written Qualifying Examination otherwise fulfills the criteria but the

Examination requires minor amendments, the examiners may require thecandidate to make such amendmentswithin three months. The amended

examination shall be submitted to the examiners or one of their numbernominated by them for confirmation that the amendments are satisfactory.

c. If the Written Qualifying Examination, though inadequate, shall seem of

sufficient merit to justify such action, the examiners may determine that thecandidate be permitted to re-present the Written Qualifying Examination in a

revised form within 12 months. Examiners shall not, however, make such adecision without submitting the candidate to the Oral Qualifying Examination.

The examiners may at their discretion exempt the candidate from a further oralexamination, on re-presentation of the Written Qualifying Examination.

d. If the examiners determine that a candidate has not reached the standard

required for the re-submission of the Written Qualifying Examination, in a revised

form, the examiners may determine that the candidate has not passed the WrittenQualifying Examination.

Note: If a student is asked to revise a Written Qualifying Examination, but still

fails to satisfy the examiners, the student will be given a one-year leave duringwhich he or she can prepare to resubmit the Written Exam. During this year, the

student will not receive formal supervision from IDSVA faculty. The studentmust re-submit the examination within a year, or formally request a second leave

of absence. If, on the third try, the student still fails to satisfy the committee, heor she will be asked to withdraw from the program. Additionally, if a student is

unable to complete a revision of the Written Examination within two years ofinitial exam, he or she will be asked to withdraw from the program.

1.7.2 The Oral Qualifying Examination:

a. If the Oral Qualifying Examination fulfills the criteria (set out in 1.2 above),

and the examiners are fully satisfied with the students performance in theExamination, the examiners may determine that the candidate has fully passed the

Oral Qualifying Examination.


7/23


Page 7 of 14

b. If the Oral Qualifying Examination otherwise fulfills the criteria but thecandidates performance is deemed less than fully satisfactory, the examiners may

require the candidate to re-sit the Oral Qualifying Examination within six months.

c. If the Oral Qualifying Examination, though inadequate, shall seem of sufficient

merit to justify such action, the examiners may determine that the candidate bepermitted to re-sit the Oral Qualifying Examination within 12 months. Examiners

shall not, however, make such a decision without submitting the candidate to aWritten Qualifying Examination. The examiners may at their discretion exempt

the candidate from making amendments to the Written Qualifying Examination.

d. If the examiners determine that a candidate has not reached the standardrequired for re-sitting the Oral Qualifying Examination, the examiners may

determine that the candidate has not passed the Oral Qualifying Examination.

Note: If a student is asked to re-sit an Oral Qualifying Examination, but still failsto satisfy the examiners, the student will be given a one-year leave during which

he or she can prepare to re-sit the Oral Exam. During this year, the student willnot receive supervision from IDSVA faculty. If, on the third try, the student still

fails to satisfy the committee, he or she will be asked to withdraw from theprogram. The second and, if needed, third exams must be completed within two

years of sitting for the exam initially.

1.8. Examiners have the right to make comments in confidence to IDSVA in a separate

report. Such comments should not normally be concerned with the performance of thecandidate but may cover, for example, matters towhich they wish to draw the attention of

IDSVA.

1.9. The Oral Qualifying Examination will normally be conducted at the Dissertation

Residency at Brown University (or an equivalent location as chosen by IDSVA,including the possibility of teleconference).

1.10. The examiners may, at their discretion, consult the IDSVA Director beforecompleting their report, particularly if they have doubts relating to the appropriate

decision to be made.

2. Oral Examination Study Tips

1. Review the Course of Study that your cohort followed (i.e. all of the seminars). Read

all of the course descriptions that introduce the course reading lists, so as to re-familiarizeyourself with the larger philosophical/theoretical context within which the reading list

was introduced to you.

2. Then review the Course of Study Reading List. The director will prepare a generalCourse of Study Reading List for each cohort. However, if you took a leave at any point,

your own reading list may not exactly match one. Be sure that you review the syllabi forthe courses that you actually took. This document comprises the course headings plus the


8/23


Page 8 of 14

reading list and will allow you to quickly ascertain the Course of Study's historicaltrajectory.

3. Now go to Open Class Forum, archived in IDSVA Seminars. Review in order all of thematerial from your Cohorts discussions. Along with the Course of Study and the Course

of Study Reading List, the archived OCF discussions will begin to bring into focus thenarrative implicit to the curriculum.

4. Re-read all of the exams you wrote for the seminars. The exam questions and your

essay responses link the texts together in terms of the inter-textual narrative referred toabove.

5. Repeat steps 1-4. Begin noting where links in your particular narrative chain are

missing. Go back and review the texts you need to review

6. Once you have put together your own list of 15 texts, you should add it on to the list

youve created based on the seminar readings. Think about how your particular list"slants the story" in a direction that is unique to your critical standpoint.

7. And be sure that you are not working in isolation. With others who are taking the

exam at the same time, create a study group. Those who work in groups to prepare for theorals tend to excel, while those who try to go it alone tend to struggle or fail.

3. Requirements applicable to Dissertations submitted for the degree of PhD

3.1. The work submitted in a Dissertation must have been done after the initial

registration for a degree.

3.2. A candidate will not be permitted to submit as his/her Dissertation one which hasbeen submitted for a degree or comparable award of this or any other University or

institution.

3.3. A candidate must have the title of the Dissertation approved by the candidatessupervisor.

3.4. A copy of the Dissertation in Portable Document Format (PDF) is submitted to theRegistrar, who will confirm that the dissertation conforms to the mechanical requirements

for the document.

3.5. After being approved by the Registrar, the student shall have copies printed, simplybound, and sent to all of the committee members for review.

3.6. After the examination has been completed and before the degree is awarded, the

successful candidate is required to submit to IDSVA, for lodging in the IDSVA library,one copy of the Dissertation in Portable Document Format (PDF). Please note that

dissertations are submitted in digital versions only.

3.7. Every candidate is required to present a short abstract of the Dissertation of not more


9/23


Page 9 of 14

than 300 words with each copy of the Dissertation submitted to IDSVA, included as apreface in the PDF document.

4. Dissertation for the PhD degree

4.1. The scope of the Dissertation shall be what might reasonably be expected after thecompletion of the coursework curriculum and two, or at most three, years of full-time

study following the completion of coursework.

4.2. After satisfying the requirements of the Qualifying Exams, the candidate will begiven permission to proceed to the dissertation (see Appendix A), and will be assigned to

a Dissertation Director. The Dissertation Directors role is to supervise the studentsDissertation research, to read drafts, and to offer feedback and advice. The candidate and

director should schedule telephone/skype meetings at least once a month. In addition, theDissertation Director becomes the students Advisor for the remainder of her/his time at

IDSVA. In that capacity, the Dissertation Director is expected to be able to provide lettersof recommendation for the student for professional positions and opportunities, and to

guide the student through the job application process. The Chair of Dissertation Directorswill speak with both the candidate and director at least once a month.

Dissertation Preparation is offered during the regular Fall and Spring semesters(September to December, and January to April, respectively). Students will receive 1

dissertation credit for each semester of dissertation preparation. At the beginning of thesemester, the candidate and director agree on a work plan for the semester, covering both

reading and writing goals. The course is graded on a Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory basis, inlight of the semesters work plan.

Grading Scale for Dissertation PreparationGrade point Letter grade

0 S Satisfactory

0 U Unsatisfactory

I Incomplete

W Withdrawn

Candidates will receive no more than 6 credits in dissertation preparation beyond the 60-

credit Course of Study. Candidates are considered to be enrolled half-time while enrolledin Dissertation Preparation. Candidates receiving federal financial aid are not eligible to

receive federal loans for more than 6 semesters of dissertation preparation.

4.3. The Dissertation shall:

(a) consist of the candidates own account of his/her investigations, and must indicate

how they appear to advance the study of the subject;

(b) form a distinct contribution to the knowledge of the subject and afford evidence oforiginality by the discovery of new facts and/or by the exercise of independent critical


10/23


Page 10 of 14

power, give a critical assessment of the relevant literature, and in so doing,demonstrate a deep and synoptic understanding of the field of study, objectivity, and

the capacity for judgment in complex situations and autonomous work in that field;

(c) be an integrated whole and present a coherent argument; [A series of papers,

whether published or otherwise, is not acceptable for submission as a Dissertation.Research work already published, or submitted for publication, at the time of

submission of the Dissertation, either by the candidate alone or jointly with others,may not be included as part of the Dissertation.]

(d) be written in English and the literary presentation shall be commensurate with the

highest standards of scholarly writing in the Humanities;

(e) be of a standard to merit publication in whole or in part or in a revised form (forexample as a monograph or as a number of articles in academic journals).

(f) include a full bibliography and references;

(g) comprise a word count of 80,000 - 100,000 words; [Note: IDSVA requires that thelength of the Dissertation shall not, other than in the most exceptional circumstances,

exceed 100,000 words. The bibliography is excluded from the word count; endnotesare included within the word count. Appendices are excluded from the word count

and should only include material that examiners are not required to read in order toexamine the Dissertation, but to which they may refer if they wish.]

(h) be presented in this format:

Times New Roman 12-point

double-spaced 10 point spacing after paragraphs

standard US 8.5 x 11 inch paper (or its digital equivalent) single-sided printing

top and bottom margins 1 right margin 1.25

left margin 1.75 (to allow for binding) pages numbered in the bottom right corner

Additionally:

The notes should be in endnote form;

Illustrations or tables should be interpolated into the text proper unless

compelling reasons not to exist.

Illustrations should be sized appropriately for adequate reproduction quality(72 dpi).


11/23


Page 11 of 14

As of 2013, MLA style shall be the guiding house style. Until then, bothChicago Manual of Style and MLA are acceptable. The title page should

follow the format that appears in Appendix C.

5. Entry to examination and submission of Dissertation

5.1. IDSVA shall require the submission of a completed registration form for each of its

candidates. See Appendix B.

5.2. A candidate shall be examined in accordance with the regulations in force at the

time of his/her entry or re-entry into the Program of Study at IDSVA.

5.3. The registration form must be submitted at least four monthsbefore the defense.

5.4. A candidate is required to submit with the entry form a short (approximately 300word) description of the content of the Dissertation to assist in the appointment of

suitable examiners.

5.5. The candidate is required to submit review copies of the dissertation to all members

of the committee, printed and simply bound, no later than two months prior to thedefense.

5.6. If the candidate has not submitted his/her Dissertation for examination within 18

months from the submission of the form of entry for the examination, the entry will becancelled unless for special reasons the candidates supervisor requests otherwise.

6. Availability of Dissertations

6.1. Subject to paragraph 6.2 below, candidates for the PhD degree will, at the time of

entry to the examination, be required to sign a declaration in the following terms:

(a) I authorize that the Dissertation presented by me in [year] for examination for the

PhD degree of IDSVA shall, if a degree is awarded, be deposited in the library orelectronic institutional repository;

(b) I authorize IDSVA authorities to supply a copy of the abstract of my Dissertation

for inclusion in any appropriate published list of Dissertations offered for higherdegrees in United States universities or in any supplement thereto, or for consultation

in any central file of abstracts of such Dissertations;

(c) I authorize the IDSVA Library or its designated agents to keep a digital copy ofmy Dissertation for the purposes of electronic public access, inter-library loan and the

supply of copies;

(d) I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the

rights of any third party;


12/23


Page 12 of 14

(e) I understand that in the event of my Dissertation not being approved by theexaminers, this declaration would become void.

6.2. A candidate may apply to IDSVA for restriction of access, for a period not exceedingtwo years, to his/her Dissertation and/or the abstract of the Dissertation in very

exceptional circumstances and in accordance with the procedure adopted by IDSVA forconsideration of such applications.

7. Conduct of the Dissertation Defense

7.1. Except as provided in paragraph 7.3.(c) the examiners, after reading the Dissertation,

shall examine the candidate orally (and/or, at their discretion, by written papers orpractical examination or by both methods) on the subject of the Dissertation and, if they

see fit, on subjects relevant thereto.

7.2. When possible, candidates will schedule the Dissertation Defense to be held in

conjunction with the July Residency or the January Residency. In such cases, thecandidate and Dissertation Director, as well as many committee members as practicably

can, will convene in person. Other committee members will join via teleconference.When candidates cannot reasonably schedule the defense for one of those times, or when

traveling to those locales is prohibitive, candidates may choose to conduct theDissertation Defense by phone or in person at an alternative place and time as IDSVA

may decide. For the in-person Dissertation Defense, the candidate is required to bring acopy of his/her Dissertation paginated in the same way as the submitted copies.

7.3. There are five options open to examiners in determining the result of the

examination, as follows:

(a) If the Dissertation fulfils the criteria (set out in 4.3 above) and the candidatesatisfies the examiners in all other parts of the examination, the examiners will report

that the candidate has satisfied them in the examination for the PhD degree.

(b) If the Dissertation otherwise fulfils the criteria but requires minor amendmentsand if the candidate satisfies the examiners in all other parts of the examination, the

examiners may require the candidate to make amendments specified by them, doingso within three months. The amended Dissertation shall be submitted to the

examiners or one of their number nominated by them for confirmation that theamendments are satisfactory.

(c) If the Dissertation, though inadequate, shall seem of sufficient merit to justifysuch action, the examiners may determine that the candidate be permitted to re-

present the Dissertation in a revised form within 18 months. Examiners shall not,however, make such a decision without submitting the candidate to a Dissertation

Defense. The examiners may at their discretion exempt from a further oralexamination, on re-presentation of the Dissertation, a candidate who under this

regulation has been permitted to re-present in revised form.


13/23


Page 13 of 14

(d) If the Dissertation satisfies the criteria for the degree, but the candidate fails tosatisfy the examiners at the Dissertation Defense, the examiners may determine that

the candidate be permitted to re-present the same Dissertation, and submit to anadditional Dissertation Defense within a period specified by them and not exceeding

18 months.

(e) If, after completion of the examination including the Dissertation Defense for the

PhD degree, the examiners determine that a candidate has not reached the standardrequired for the award of the degree nor for the re-presentation of the Dissertation in a

revised form for that degree, the examiners may determine that the candidate has notsatisfied them in the examination. The examiners shall not, however, except in very

unusual circumstances, make such a decision without submitting the candidate to aDissertation Defense.

7.4 If the examiners are unable to reach agreement, their reports shall be referred to the

IDSVA Director, who shall determine the action to be taken.

7.5. A candidate who fails to satisfy the examiners will not be permitted to re-enter forthe examination, but the candidate may apply to register de novo for a further period of

study leading to the submission of a Dissertation on a different topic, the title of whichhas been approved in accordance with paragraph 3.3, above.

8. Notification of results of the Dissertation Defense

8.1. After the examiners have reached a decision, every candidate shall be notified by the

IDSVA Director of the result of the Dissertation Defense. The degree shall not beawarded until one copy of the successful Dissertation in Portable Document Format

(PDF) has been lodged with IDSVA (see paragraph 3.6 above).

8.2. A diploma under the seal of IDSVA shall be subsequently delivered to each

candidate who has been awarded a degree.

8.3. The diploma for the degree will bear the names of the candidate in the form in whichthey appear in the records of IDSVA at the date of issue.

8.4 Candidates who elect to participate in a graduation ceremony will receive their

diplomas at that ceremony.

9. General Remarks

9.1. The work in the Dissertation submitted by the candidate must be his/her own and

submission of a Dissertation for examination for the PhD degree will be regarded as adeclaration of this fact.

9.2. All work submitted as part of the requirements for any examination of IDSVA must

be expressed in the candidates own words and incorporate his/her own ideas and


14/23


Page 14 of 14

judgments. Plagiarism is the presentation of another persons thoughts or words asthough they were the candidates own and is an examination offense. Direct quotations

from the published or unpublished work of another must always be clearly identified assuch by being placed inside quotation marks, and a full reference to their source must be

provided in the proper form. A series of short quotations from several different sources, if

not clearly identified as such, constitutes plagiarism as much as does a singleunacknowledged long quotation from a single source. Equally, if another persons ideasor judgments are summarized, the candidate must refer to that person in his/her text, and

include the work to which reference is made in the bibliography.

9.3. Allegations of plagiarism will be considered by a committee appointed by IDSVA, as

will any other allegations of examination misconduct, including, but not limited to:

(a) deliberate attempts to represent falsely or unfairly the ideas or work of others;

(b) the invention or fabrication of data;

(c) the submission of work commissioned from another person.

9.4. Candidates may avail themselves of the services of a copy editor for the final edit of

the Dissertation. In order to avoid potential academic misconduct, candidates who wishto work with an editor should consult the list of IDSVA-approved editors maintained by

the Director of Dissertation Committees.

9.5 Any application of appeal must be made within two months of notification of theresult of the examination to the candidate.

9.6. If a candidate has entered the examination for the PhD degree, but the candidate hasnot settled all fees owed to IDSVA or made acceptable arrangements to settle any

account outstanding, no report shall be made on the result of the examination untilpayment has been made in full.


15/23

INSTITUTE FOR DOCTORAL STUDIES IN THE VISUAL ARTS

Permission to Proceed to the Dissertation

This memo serves as official confirmation that ________________________

has successfully completed both the Oral and Written Qualifying Exams as of

_____________________ and is permitted to begin the dissertation phase of doctoral

studies at IDSVA.

___________________________ will be working with _________________________

as her/his Dissertation Director.


16/23

INSTITUTE FOR DOCTORAL STUDIES IN THE VISUAL ARTS

Dissertation Registration Form

Date:

Candidates Name:

Date of Enrollment:

Director of Dissertation:

Dissertation Committee:

Title of Dissertation:

Expected Date of DissertationSubmission:

Requested Date of Defense:


17/23

Title page and other front materials formats (seven pages)

TITLE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS: CENTERED, DOUBLE-SPACED AND

ALMOST CERTAINLY TAKING TWO LINES

Your Name as it appears in IDSVA records

Submitted to the faculty of

The Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Artsin partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degreeDoctor of Philosophy

Month, Year


18/23

ii

Accepted by the faculty of the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partialfulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

______________________________

Dissertation Directors Name, Ph.D.

Doctoral Committee ______________________________

Other members name, #1 Ph.D.

______________________________

Other members name, #2, Ph.D.

(repeat as needed)

Date of official submission


20/23

iv

(optional)

a quote (or two) that serve as epigram for the whole

(centered)

dedication (right justified)


21/23

v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Acknowledgements should be single-spaced. You can, of course, thank anyone whom

youd like to thank. At minimum, thank your director and committee members and thefolks who have been supportive of your time at IDSVA (e. g. partner, children, dear

friends). Even if the paragraph(s) take only a few lines, the acknowledgements get apage of their own.


22/23

vi

ABSTRACT

Your full name

TITLE OF DISSERTATION

What follows on this page, and perhaps spills over onto the next, is the

ABSTRACT. It should be double-spaced, and should be NO MORE THAN 300 words.

It should situate the project by indicating what the problem/question was that you set out

to investigate, what your thesis was, and why that thesis seemed important as a

contribution to scholarly inquiry. It should not include any material that needs to be

footnoted or otherwise cited, as it should be able to stand alone as a coherent, albeit short,

description of the long project. Note that it should be left-justified.


23/23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

One final note: all of the pages so far, including this one, should be numbered in lower

case roman numerals). The next page, which is the first of the Introduction to the

dissertation proper, should be 1 (an Arabic numeral).

IDSVA Dissertation-Handbook 2012 Copy

Documents