Identity Formation and Possible Selves: Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner in Mathematics Alan Zollman Northern Illinois University October 27, 2009.

Identity Formation and Possible Selves:

Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner in Mathematics

Alan ZollmanNorthern Illinois University

October 27, 2009

Identity Formation and Possible Selves:

Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner in Mathematics

Alan ZollmanNorthern Illinois University

October 27, 2009

"I'm beginning to understand myself. But it would have been great to be able to

understand myself when I was 20 rather than when I was 82."

~ Dave Brubeck, American

jazz pianist

"I'm beginning to understand myself. But it would have been great to be able to

understand myself when I was 20 rather than when I was 82."

~ Dave Brubeck, American

jazz pianist

Question 1:

As a lieutenant you need to get a 40-foot telephone pole raised.

You have 5 privates and 1 sergeant.

Specifically,

how do you get the pole raised properly?

Question 1:

As a lieutenant you need to get a 40-foot telephone pole raised.

You have 5 privates and 1 sergeant.

Specifically,

how do you get the pole raised properly?

Question 2:

When you were in the first grade,

what did you plan to be?

Question 2:

When you were in the first grade,

what did you plan to be?

Question 2:

When you were in the first grade,

what did you plan to be?

WHY?

Question 2:

When you were in the first grade,

what did you plan to be?

WHY?

Question 3:

If you grow up,

where do you plan to be?

Question 3:

If you grow up,

where do you plan to be?

Question 3:

If you grow up,

where do you plan to be?

WHY?

Question 3:

If you grow up,

where do you plan to be?

WHY?

Why, in one class, do we have some students mathematically achieve, and other students in the same class with similar aptitude and background do not?

What is that one attribute we cannot put a finger on that is the difference between these students?

Why, in one class, do we have some students mathematically achieve, and other students in the same class with similar aptitude and background do not?

What is that one attribute we cannot put a finger on that is the difference between these students?

Why, in one class, do we have some students mathematically achieve, and other students in the same class with similar aptitude and background do not?

What is that one attribute we cannot put a finger on that is the difference between these students?

I say the major influence is self identity.

Why, in one class, do we have some students mathematically achieve, and other students in the same class with similar aptitude and background do not?

What is that one attribute we cannot put a finger on that is the difference between these students?

I say the major influence is self identity.

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

3) Cognitive Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

3) Cognitive Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

3) Cognitive Development

4) Identity Development

Students’ Development

1) Physical Development

2) Social Development

3) Cognitive Development

4) Identity Development

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity formation is a striving to achieve a unified, integrated sense of self.

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity formation is a striving to achieve a unified, integrated sense of self.

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity formation is a striving to achieve a unified, integrated sense of self.

This requires the incorporation of past and present identifications with significant others, recognition of one’s aptitudes and skills, and occupational goals and aspirations.

Identity Formation

Identity formation is the fundamental development task of psychological maturity

Identity formation is a striving to achieve a unified, integrated sense of self.

This requires the incorporation of past and present identifications with significant others, recognition of one’s aptitudes and skills, and occupational goals and aspirations.

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

Identity Formation

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

All affective domain topics—motivation, persistence, self-esteem, self-confidence, attitude, even behavior—are outcomes of our personal identity.

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

All affective domain topics—motivation, persistence, self-esteem, self-confidence, attitude, even behavior—are outcomes of our personal identity.

Identity Formation

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

All affective domain topics—motivation, persistence, self-esteem, self-confidence, attitude, even behavior—are outcomes of our personal identity.

Forming one’s identity is as important as developing one’s social skills or cognitive abilities.

Identity is how we respond to the environmental, cognitive, and social affects in our lives.

All affective domain topics—motivation, persistence, self-esteem, self-confidence, attitude, even behavior—are outcomes of our personal identity.

Forming one’s identity is as important as developing one’s social skills or cognitive abilities.

Identity Formation

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy; – "Is my world predictable and supportive?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy; – "Is my world predictable and supportive?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers; – "Can I do things myself or must I always

rely on others?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers; – "Can I do things myself or must I always

rely on others?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood; – "Am I good or am I bad?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood; – "Am I good or am I bad?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;– "Am I successful or worthless?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;– "Am I successful or worthless?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence; – "Who am I and where am I going?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence; – "Who am I and where am I going?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;– "Am I loved and wanted?" or "Shall I share

my life with someone or live alone?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;– "Am I loved and wanted?" or "Shall I share

my life with someone or live alone?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;– "Will I produce something of real value?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;– "Will I produce something of real value?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

8) integrity versus despair, in old age (Erikson, 1950).

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

8) integrity versus despair, in old age (Erikson, 1950).

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

8) integrity versus despair, in old age (Erikson, 1950).– "Have I lived a full life?”

Eight Psychosocial Stages

1) trust versus mistrust, in infancy;

2) autonomy versus shame and doubt, in toddlers;

3) initiative versus guilt, in early childhood;

4) industry versus inferiority, in middle childhood;

5) identity versus role diffusion, in adolescence;

6) intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood;

7) generativity versus stagnation, in middle adult life;

8) integrity versus despair, in old age (Erikson, 1950).– "Have I lived a full life?”

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Adolescents initiate identity work as they begin to think about their competencies and attributes,

academic and occupational goals, and personal beliefs.

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Adolescents initiate identity work as they begin to think about their competencies and attributes,

academic and occupational goals, and personal beliefs.

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Adolescents initiate identity work as they begin to think about their competencies and attributes,

academic and occupational goals, and personal beliefs.

School and peers are important social contexts where much identity work occurs.

Identity Crisis

Identity crisis occurs when the adolescent attempts to integrate childhood identification with ideas about

what one wants to be and become as an adult.

Adolescents initiate identity work as they begin to think about their competencies and attributes,

academic and occupational goals, and personal beliefs.

School and peers are important social contexts where much identity work occurs.

Possible selves are influenced by social, cultural and historical contexts that surround the individual and function to generate feelings of

a) competence (when a goal is attained),

b) self-efficacy (beliefs about one’s personal competence in mathematics), and

b) personal control (what one can do to achieve a hoped-for self).

Possible selves are influenced by social, cultural and historical contexts that surround the individual and function to generate feelings of

a) competence (when a goal is attained),

b) self-efficacy (beliefs about one’s personal competence in mathematics), and

b) personal control (what one can do to achieve a hoped-for self).

Possible Selves Theory is a theoretical foundation to promote teachers’ understanding of identity formation—their students’ and their own.

Possible selves are one’s ideas about what one can become in the future.

These perceptions of one’s future self can be highly motivating to students.

When students have clear ideas about what they want to become, they are more willing to put forth the effort needed to attain their goals.

Possible Selves Theory is a theoretical foundation to promote teachers’ understanding of identity formation—their students’ and their own.

Possible selves are one’s ideas about what one can become in the future.

These perceptions of one’s future self can be highly motivating to students.

When students have clear ideas about what they want to become, they are more willing to put forth the effort needed to attain their goals.

Hoped-for possible selves, in particular, are strong predictors of mathematics achievement.

A hoped-for self that is concrete, realistic, detailed, and invokes necessary strategies for achieving the goal that will guide student behavior and produce the intended results over time (Oyserman & Markus, 1990).

Hoped-for possible selves, in particular, are strong predictors of mathematics achievement.

A hoped-for self that is concrete, realistic, detailed, and invokes necessary strategies for achieving the goal that will guide student behavior and produce the intended results over time (Oyserman & Markus, 1990).

When students feel committed to, and invested in, working towards the attainment of hoped-for selves, and when they connect current behaviors to the accomplishment of future goals, their possible selves serve a self-regulatory role.

Students with a self-regulatory focus are better able to make changes in behavior which can lead to goal achievement.

When students feel committed to, and invested in, working towards the attainment of hoped-for selves, and when they connect current behaviors to the accomplishment of future goals, their possible selves serve a self-regulatory role.

Students with a self-regulatory focus are better able to make changes in behavior which can lead to goal achievement.

It is important for students to become self-regulated learners who can

- set learning goals

- create action plans

- then monitor their progress towards their goals

- by assessing their efforts and making adaptations as necessary

It is important for students to become self-regulated learners who can

- set learning goals

- create action plans

- then monitor their progress towards their goals

- by assessing their efforts and making adaptations as necessary

Instructor Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Instructor Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Instructor Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Instructor Initiates to Promote Identity Development

• Show your genuine warmth (not fuzziness) for students

• Cultivate teacher-student professional relationships• Model yourself as a life-long, inquisitive learner in

front of your students• Infuse passion for mathematics in your lessons• Respect students as partners in the learning

relationship

• Show your genuine warmth (not fuzziness) for students

• Cultivate teacher-student professional relationships• Model yourself as a life-long, inquisitive learner in

front of your students• Infuse passion for mathematics in your lessons• Respect students as partners in the learning

relationship

Curriculum Initiates of Identity Development Curriculum Initiates of Identity Development

Curriculum Initiates of Identity Development Curriculum Initiates of Identity Development

• Set up authentic problem-solving situations that students (not just teachers) value

• Build lessons with drama for “inquiring minds who want to know” -- the “aha!” vs. the “oh no!” problems

• Plan for students to discover patterns and relationships between and among the topics of mathematics

• Set up authentic problem-solving situations that students (not just teachers) value

• Build lessons with drama for “inquiring minds who want to know” -- the “aha!” vs. the “oh no!” problems

• Plan for students to discover patterns and relationships between and among the topics of mathematics

Peer Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Peer Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Peer Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Peer Initiates to Promote Identity Development

• Design cooperative learning activities where each student has a role; rotate roles

• Conduct role playing situations, where students view themselves and each other as mathematicians, engineers, investigators and scientists as they work on problems

• Design cooperative learning activities where each student has a role; rotate roles

• Conduct role playing situations, where students view themselves and each other as mathematicians, engineers, investigators and scientists as they work on problems

Individual Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Individual Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Individual Initiates to Promote Identity Development

Individual Initiates to Promote Identity Development

• Charge students to set goals, so they know where they want to be and what they have to do to get there; students feel they can take control of their own learning

• Ask students to regularly self-reflect on what and how they are learning mathematics

• Teach students to continually self-assess progress of learning

• Provide choices for students to demonstrate growth in self-determination, self-efficacy, self-regulation

• Charge students to set goals, so they know where they want to be and what they have to do to get there; students feel they can take control of their own learning

• Ask students to regularly self-reflect on what and how they are learning mathematics

• Teach students to continually self-assess progress of learning

• Provide choices for students to demonstrate growth in self-determination, self-efficacy, self-regulation

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The classroom is a collaborative community of learners.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

The teacher expects persistence, respect, team membership and integrity.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an

authentic problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

The teacher expects persistence, respect, team membership and integrity.

A Look Inside the ClassroomA Look Inside the ClassroomThe classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an authentic

problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

The teacher expects persistence, respect, team membership and integrity.

The students understand their roles and responsibilities to the teacher, to themselves and to their peers.

The classroom is a collaborative community of learners. The cooperative learning group is engaged in an authentic

problem, thinking aloud about what they know, and trying to connect previous ideas to the current topic.

There is warmth to the interactions between the teacher and students and mutual respect.

The teacher trusts students, and they trust the teacher. The teacher grants them autonomy – the ability to make

choices that determine what and how they will approach the math problem – and the teacher reinforces their developing sense of competence.

The teacher expects persistence, respect, team membership and integrity.

The students understand their roles and responsibilities to the teacher, to themselves and to their peers.

Question 1:

As a lieutenant you need to get a 40-foot telephone pole raised.

You have 5 privates and 1 sergeant.

Specifically,

how do you get the pole raised properly?

Question 1:

As a lieutenant you need to get a 40-foot telephone pole raised.

You have 5 privates and 1 sergeant.

Specifically,

how do you get the pole raised properly?

Question 1: The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

Question 1: The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

Question 1: The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

This solution displays an understanding and communication of the officer’s expectations of: trust, autonomy, initiative, persistence, role identification,

team membership, respect and integrity.

Question 1: The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

This solution displays an understanding and communication of the officer’s expectations of: trust, autonomy, initiative, persistence, role identification,

team membership, respect and integrity.

Question 1:

The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

This solution displays an understanding and communication of the officer’s expectations of: trust, autonomy, initiative, persistence, role identification,

team membership, respect and integrity.

It allows the privates and sergeant to become self-regulated problem solvers.

Question 1:

The correct response is (supposedly):

Order the sergeant and the privates to get the job done, leave, and return later.

This solution displays an understanding and communication of the officer’s expectations of: trust, autonomy, initiative, persistence, role identification,

team membership, respect and integrity.

It allows the privates and sergeant to become self-regulated problem solvers.

Question 3: The correct response is:

Question 3: The correct response is:

Question 4: The correct response is:

Be sitting in your chair at NIU!

Question 4: The correct response is:

Be sitting in your chair at NIU!

Dr. Alan ZollmanDept. of Mathematical Sciences Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalb, IL 60115815/[email protected]

http://www.math.niu.edu/~zollman

Dr. Alan ZollmanDept. of Mathematical Sciences Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalb, IL 60115815/[email protected]

http://www.math.niu.edu/~zollman