Top Banner
Identity Economics George A. Akerlof ISEO June 24, 2010
30

Identity Economics George A. Akerlof ISEO June 24, 2010

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

shay-young

Identity Economics George A. Akerlof ISEO June 24, 2010. Thanks to Rachel Kranton. Initially thought identity was just tastes. Four papers: Economics and Identity: QJE (2000). Schooling and Identity: JEL (2002). Organizations and Identity: JEP (2005). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Identity Economics

George A. Akerlof

ISEOJune 24, 2010

Page 2: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

• Thanks to Rachel Kranton.

• Initially thought identity was just tastes.

• Four papers:

– Economics and Identity: QJE (2000).

– Schooling and Identity: JEL (2002).

– Organizations and Identity: JEP (2005).

– Macroeconomics and Identity: AER (2007).

Page 3: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economics: About Incentives

• Freakonomics:

– About price theory.

• Missing Motivation in current economics:

– The Missing Piece.

• Important economic problems.

Page 4: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Standard Method of Economics

• Maximization of Utility (Individuals).

• Maximization of Profits (Firms).

• Classification of Motive.

Page 5: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

The Missing Motivation: Norms

• Pareto.

• Opinions how they should, or how they should not, behave.

• Views how others should, or should not, behave.

• Depends upon their identity:

–Who people think they are.

Page 6: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Ideals

• Example:

– Religion and religious leaders.

• Principle:

– People tend to be happy when they live up to how they think they should be.

– They are unhappy when they fail to live up to those norms.

Page 7: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Other Examples

• Teacher.

• Dignity at work.

• Betty Friedan.

• Merry-Go-Round.

Page 8: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

• Millions of women lived their lives in the image of those pretty pictures of the American suburban housewife, kissing their husbands goodbye in front of the picture window, depositing their stationwagonsful of children at school, and smiling as they ran the new electric waxer over the spotless kitchen floor. They gloried in their role as women, and wrote proudly on the census blank: “Occupation, housewife.”

Page 9: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010
Page 10: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Protocol for Adding Identity to Economics

• How does the decision maker conceive of herself?

• What is her ideal?

• How does utility depend upon distance between ideal behavior, e*, and actual behavior, e?

• How do others affect identity utility?

• If this is true motivation, we have no choice: Must be in utility function.

Page 11: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Outline of Rest of Seminar

• Economics of Minority Poverty.

• Economics of Education.

• Economics of Organizations.

• Economics of Gender in the Workplace.

• Economics of Gender in the Household.

• Macroeconomics.

• Five functional changes to economics.

• Conclusion.

Page 12: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Impoverished Minorities

• African-Americans:

– Non-employment: Males, 25-34, close to 40 percent.

– Lifetime chances of imprisonment: close to 1/3.

– Out-of-wedlock birth rate: close to 2/3.

Page 13: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Oppositional Culture

• History of injustice.

• Continued divisions between “us” and “them.”

• Natural reaction:

– If they thumb their noses at us, we can thumb our noses at them.

• Negative economic consequences.

Page 14: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Standard Theory

• Leading theory in African-American studies:

– Elijah Anderson.

– James Baldwin.

– Kenneth Clark.

– W. E. B. Du Bois.

– Franklin Frazier.

– Ulf Hannerz.

– John Ogbu.

– Lee Rainwater.

– William Julius Wilson.

Page 15: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economic Policy

• Understanding.

• Public money and public resources.

• Schooling.

– Effectiveness of:

• Small class size.

• Excellent Teaching.

– Miracle Schools.

– Need for Extra Resources.

Page 16: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economics of Education

• Traditional Questions:

– How Much Education?

– Returns to Education?

– Effectiveness of Programs?

Page 17: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Literature on Education

• History of Education:

– Emphasis on immigrant experience.

– Imposition of Identity.

• Shopping Mall High:

– Failure to Impose Identity.

• Adolescent Society and the Bishops:

– Role of the leading crowd.

– The role of bullying.

Page 18: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Students form groups with strong independent sub-cultures in order to produce and consume friendship, emotional support, socializing, gossip, parties, competitions between schools, prestige from belonging to a high status clique. They set norms for academic engagement, pressure teachers to “go easy,” and punish group members who violate peer norms.

Page 19: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economics of Organizations

• Standard Economics:

– Give right incentives.

– Careful reading: system will be gamed.

• Solution:

– Employees identify with organization or with their jobs within it.

• Example: Teachers/US Universities.

Page 20: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Policy Implications

• High pay incentives (such as high CEO pay) is not the answer.

• Legal system: jobholders are fiduciaries.

– Basic crime: failing to fulfill obligations of office.

Page 21: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Gender and the Work Place

• Traditional Economics:

– Division of Labor according to Comparative Advantage.

• Identity Economics:

– Gendered tasks.

Page 22: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economic Policy

• Women’s Movement.

– Tasks should not be gendered.

• Sexual harassment law.

– Not just sexual harassment.

– Harassment because of inappropriate associations between gender and jobs.

– Example: Irene Padavic.

Page 23: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Economics of the Household

• Evan and Nancy Holt.

• Division of Housework.

Page 24: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Macroeconomics

• Traditional Economics:

– Stabilization policies do not work.

• Identity Economics:

–With considerations regarding how employers and workers should or should not behave, stabilization policies do work.

– Government should stabilize macroeconomy.

Page 25: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Directly Care About Identity.

• Self-Destruction.

• Example:

– Beauty Practices.

Page 26: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Identity Externalities

• US Civil War.

Page 27: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Manipulation of Others

• Advertising.

• Politics.

– Gandhi’s Salt March.

– French Revolution: Citizens.

– Russian Revolution: Comrades.

– US Presidential politics.

Page 28: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Time Inconsistency

• Different people we become:

– Graduations.

– Confirmations, bar/bat mitzvahs.

–Weddings.

– Taking on offices.

Page 29: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Choice of Identity

• Housewives and Motherhood.

• School Choice.

• Immigration.

Page 30: Identity  Economics  George A. Akerlof  ISEO June 24, 2010

Conclusion

• Different economics.

• Who the person thinks she is.

• What is her ideal.

• Reactions of Others.

• Widens scope of policy.