ICH Transformed Architecture Resource Cent “From Architectures to Implementation Real
Nov 04, 2014
ICH Transformed
Architecture Resource Center“From Architectures to Implementation Reality"
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 2
ICH – The Questions
I need independent IV&V. How do I get it?
OMB (my Department) keep kicking back my 300’s, what do I need to do?
Framework Shamework, I need actionable architectures!!!
TRM, BRM, PRM, …… how do I get there?
.NET, J2EE, web services,... How do I map my business to solution frameworks?
How do I establish a common and secure infrastructure to support my application and appropriation requirements?
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 3
ICH – The Business ICH’s charter is to aid Business Executives in creating effective Enterprise
Architecture and Asset Management. ICH is a non mandatory, non-profit, cost reimbursable EA collaboratory that provides consulting services, architecture research, and education to ensure the success of its clients and members.
ICH value proposition: ICH has a unique architecture modeling and validation process that effectively maps business needs to validated solution sets. The ICH has direct interface with both the government and industry CIO community which results in broad based contact and highly effective working relationships. Leveraging an extensive component repository, meaningful Work gets done with ICH behind it.
ICH’s primary focus is to assist clients in creating, maintaining, and operating world class Enterprise Architectures with total objectivity and fiscal responsibility.
ICH is a Non Profit (501 C 6) which provides Enterprise Architecture and IT Capital Planning Services to its members and to its Public Sector constituents. These government approved services are of a Mentoring, Assurance, IV&V, Measuring Performance Outcomes, Research, and Consulting nature. ICH focuses on the entire EA package with specific links to E GOV, Security, Critical Infrastructure Protection, Capital Planning, and Detailed Business and Technical Framework alignment to the IT infrastructure services. The ICH service offerings are delivered through reports, training, conferences, hotline, and on site facilitation.
ICH Architecture Resources are readily accessible through firm fixed price engagements or by the hour. ICH can be “reached” through GSA Schedule 70, FEDSIM, and JACER 8A contracting vehicles.
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 4
ICH – Collaboratory Best Practices ICH Enterprise Architectural Framework
Source: ICH and Member Input ICH Enterprise Architecture Templates
Source: ICH ICH Enterprise Architecture Views
ICH and The Benchmarking Company ICH and Aerospace Corp.
ICH Enterprise Architecture Repository ICH and Fed Gov’t EAMS Users
ICH Enterprise Architecture Tools ICH and Bureau of Engraving and Printing (Headstrong/Metis)
ICH Asset Management Tools Hubbard Decision Research – Applied Information Economics
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 5
ICH – The Architecture Collaboratory
CIO/User Community Society of Information Managers
Federal CIO Council
Financial Services Technology Consortium
Standards Development Organizations: Object Management Group
Open Applications Group
Data International Standards Organization
Industry Associations: IAC, NDIA, Council for Excellence in Govt,
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 6
ICH – Engagements
DARPA***
DEA
EPA*
HUD*
OSD Health Affairs
NSC Cybersecurity**
OSD**
DISA**
PTO***
Intelligence Community
FEMA*
DLA **
OMB*
US Transcom (w/ Harris)
Discovery Communications
DON CIO
*In contract negotiations
** In proposal stage
*** Negotiating next phase
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 7
ICH – The Offerings Enterprise Architecture Focus
ICH Frameworks (aligns business with technology)
ICH Performance Metric Solutions
Readiness Assessment
Normalized EA Process Templates
Capital Planning Focus A 11 – 300 Advisory and Assistance
Asset Management Economic and IT Baseline Assessment (HDR)
EA Repository EAMs Open Source
DARPA DCAM
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 8
ICH Working Groups – The Delivery Format Understanding key EA methods and tools; C4ISR, FEAF, IEEE 1471, OMG
MDA, OSI RM-ODP, Enterprise Architecture Planning; Developing and roadmap: Choosing the
right resources Enterprise Architecture and Asset Portfolio Management Assuring Interoperability in the Architecture Federal Business Reference Model Developing the Technical Reference Model and the Role of Standards
(A119) Security Architectures and GISRA Compliance Critical Information Infrastructure Frameworks E Gov Frameworks and Component Architectures Web Services Frameworks Differentiating Knowledge Management, Data Warehousing and Portals
frameworks Capital IT Planning: How to drive A11-300 from EA outputs Making your EA Actionable: Metrics, specifics, and acquisition factors ICH EA Assessment Framework
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 9
ICH – The Why
“...
Analysis of the $52 Billion found... Automation of outdated processes
Duplicative IT investments
Few IT investments significantly improve mission performance
Few demonstrated linkage of IT to business of the agency
Major Gaps in agency and government-wide computer related security
$10 bn, 400 projects still have to address business case issues
Source Bill McVeigh-OMB
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 10
ICH – The Mandate
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 11
AS ISCurrent Enterprise Lifecycle Planning:
Strateg
ic Plan
nin
g=
CIO
Ad
visory
Capital Planning= Cost Benefit Analysis
Performance≠ Accountability
Compliance= “The Minimum”
Application
Data
Technology
IT Architecture = Objects & Standards
Planning islands with little to no leverage of information across planning exercises.
No consistency and logical connections between planning components
Many planning steps are duplicated in different planning components leading to incompatible formats
Planning resources are scarce. Agencies are conditioned to meet requirements bare minimum which often results in poorly funded projects.
Existing services firms are vested in the status quo will not drive process improvements in this area
Business= Program Office
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 12
Performance Metrics
TRANSITIONEnterprise Lifecycle Planning
Strategic Planning
Business
Application
Data
TechnologyEn
terp
rise
A
rch
itec
ture
Capital
Planning
$
Co
mp
lian
ce
Performance Management
System
GAO ITM Level 3
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 13
Compliance
Capital Planning / Asset Management
TO BEEffective Enterprise Lifecycle Planning:
Technology Architecture
Data Architecture
Application Architecture
Business Architecture
Enterprise Architecture
Strategic IT Planning
E L C A SmartPlanR e p o s i t o r y
Per
form
ance
Man
agem
ent
Sys
tem
$$
Logical integration of all planning components
Planning activities are seamlessly connected enabling a consistent and comprehensive flow of planning activities
Business requirements and performance metrics are used as common threads across all planning components
Capital planning is tightly connected to planning activities moving beyond cost-benefits analysis maturing towards asset management
Planning activities follow applicable legislative guidelines and ensure a smooth budget submission process while maximizing targeted funding goals
The SmartPlan Repository captures and connects information from all planning activities
Reusability, Reliability, Objectivity
Do more with less by implementing the ELCA framework
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 14
ICH -Align Validate Integrate
IT Centric EAEffort andFramework
EnterpriseInclusive EAEffort andFramework withinternalAlignment,Metrics,Componentization,Normalization,and Objectivity
“Exerprise”Inclusive EAEffort andFramework withComprehensiveAlignment,Metrics,Componentization,Normalization,and Objectivity
Cost Savings IncrementalImprovement
IncrementalImprovement
IncrementalImprovement
OperationalService Quality
Supportive IncrementalImprovement
IncrementalImprovement
OperationalAlignment
Supportive IncrementalImprovement
IncrementalImprovement
BusinessAlignment
Undetermined IncrementalImprovement
SubstantialImprovement
Validity Undetermined InternalValidity
IncrementalImprovement
Adaptability Undetermined InternalAdaptability
IncrementalImprovement
• Community Based• Comprehensive: “Exerprise”•Alignment Driven•Metric Justified•Adaptive•Normative•Non Prescriptive
Critical Success Factors
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 15
Enterprise Architecture Drivers/Inhibiters
Missions, Goals and Objectives
Revenue Enhancement/Cost Reduction
Industry Shifts,Obsolescence,Recent Investments
Organizational ChangeConsiderations
Budget Legislative DirectivesMandates,Regulations
Enterprise Architecture
BusinessProcess Layer:
TechnologyEnablement Layer:(Application)
Domain discipline
Architectures Component Security Networking Platform Infrast. Mgmt
Data
Business Driver – Process Mapping
Functional Hierarchies,Location Mappings
Process Maps
ProcessDescriptions,PerformanceMetrics
Security and other Policies
Technology Enabler – Process Mapping
Solution Set:
1. Function/Feature,2. Performance Characteristic3. Performance Measure
BusinessProcessPatterns
Solution Set Patterns
Application Standards & Policies
InformationLayer:
Data Dictionary
Key Information Classes
Data Standards & Policies
Data Movement Req.
DataPatterns
InfrastructureServiceLayer:
Solution Set & Information - Infrastructure Mapping
Infrastructure Enabler Description
Topology Mappings, High Level Protocol Stacks
IT Mgmt Architecture, Standards & Policies
Infrastructure Patterns
Solution Set – Information & Infrastructure Mapping
ICH EA Framework
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 16
ICH Assurance Supports the Complete EA Life Cycle
EA Project Planning
EA Project Start Up
EA Development
EA Implementation Planning
EA Implementation
Org Readiness Assessment
EA Planning WorkshopsFramework Develop. Support
EA Plan ReviewRegulatory Conform.
Expectation Level Set
Project Charter Dev. Support
plan oversight.Iterative Deliverable Reviews.3rd Party ValidationRemediation SupportRegulatory Conform.
Cap. Budget IntegrationImplementation Risk AssessmentOrganizational Fit Assessment
Milestone ReviewsRemediation Support RegulatoryConform.
Clinger-Cohen OMB GAO
EA Project Life Cycle
ICH AssuranceDeliverableOverview
ICH Enterprise Architecture Best Practice KPIs
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 17
Comprehensive Validation
Readiness Assessment
CommitmentResourcesBusiness Performance MetricsExpectations
Process Assurance: Are we doing it right?
Architecture Assurance: Are we achieving aligned, validated and measurable results?
Organization Fit: Does it match organization expectations and abilities to implement?
Actionability: Can it be implemented as planned, and adapt to change?
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 18
ICH AssuranceProgramDeliverables
Annual Subscription
Mentoring Program
Validation Program
Immersion Program
Combine Offerings Duration
ICH Deliverables
ICH Basic membership * * * * * 1 year
Architecture Audit * * * * 45 days/per
Project Plan * * * * 15 daysICH’s EA Process/Methodology Key Performance Indicator Descriptions * * * 15 daysThree day EA w orkshop, including training materials * * * 15 daysEA Leading-Practice Project Planning and Deliverable Templates * * * * 45 daysEA Process Assesment, Final Plan Certif ication, and Project Audit * * * 30 daysProject problem remediation and w orkshop support * * * 60 daysICH EA Framew ork Key Performance Indicator Descriptions * * * 30 daysThree day w orkshop on EA Framew ork Development * * * 15 daysICH’s leading-practices Architectural Templates * * * 45 days perICH accelerated w orkshop review s architecture audit report * * * 90 daysArchitecture quality problem remediation w ith SME support * * * 5 daysICH Bronze Branded EA Framework *
ICH Silver Branding *Organizational Readiness Assessment/Business Metric Identif ication * 45 days
Organizational Change Plan * * 45 daysImplementation Plan Assessment Report * * 90 daysRegulatory Compliance Audit (A11/130,GPRA, GISRA) * 45 days/per
ICH Gold Branding * 15 days
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 19
ICH
Confidence
Level
Resources (cost & time)
Trade Studies
Testing Alone
Traditional approach
ICH advantage
High
Low
RiskDelta
Cost/timeDelta
ICH Value PropositionReducing the time, cost, and risk of validating proposed solutions
“The ICH repository data and analysis methodologies was very helpful in supporting a quick turn around for [Information Assurance] section of COTS security products. Highly detailed ICH technology domain and product evaluation data comprised over 60% of this urgently needed [architecture] report”. Mike Luby, Program Manager, Logicon/PRC
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 20
BusinessRequirements
ProductSpecifications
Solution Models & Vetting Results
IT/IA Standards
Solution Lexicon�Two Phase Commit�Object Storage�Relational Constructs�Row Level Locking�Referential Integrity�ODBC Interface�SQL Interface�JDBC Interface�IDL Interface
Normalized
Specification
DB Standard X, v2Two Phase Commit�Relational Constructs�Row Level Locking�Referential Integrity�ODBC Interface�SQL Interface�IDL Interface
Common Criteria
DB Product Y Two Phase Commit�Relational Constructs�Row Level Locking�Referential Integrity�ODBC Interface�SQL Interface�JDBC Interface�Triggers�OLE DB Interface�Multiphase converter
Solution ProfileScale, IndustrySolution SuiteProduct A Product B v6.1Product C v2Platform S
ICH Solution FrameworkDraws from existing testing and implementation successes
“OASIS recognizes a much-needed synergy between our own interoperability development work and the ICH charter to model and
validate interoperable solutions,” said Laura Walker, executive director of OASIS. “We look forward to seeing the efforts of both our organizations
realized through greater industry deployment of interoperability standards.”
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 21
ICH Community - Contributions
• Validated Architectures• Proven Product and Services Suites• Experience Reports• Integration Capabilities
• Standards Templates• Architecture Frameworks• Research Results
• Enterprise Technology Requirements• Domain Architecture Models• Successful Results and Experiences• Regulatory Requirements/Constraints
• Product Specifications• Technology Updates• Compliance Assertions• Product Dependencies• Implementation
References
Systems Integrators
Affiliates &Standards Liaisons
Government&
EnterpriseMembers
Vendors
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 22
ICH Community - Benefits
• Experiences from other Members
• ICH data and tools to leverage domain experience
• Differentiation by vetted integration successes
• Existence proofs that “it can be done”
• Business drivers, to ensure supporting them
• Tracking of what standards are being implemented
• Identification of needs to augment standards
• Research Topics
• Experiences from other Members• Implementation risk reduction from tools• ICH data and tools for analysis
• Level playing field for product comparison
• Validated, independent case studies/testimonials
• Direct understanding of Enterprise requirements and business drivers
Systems Integrators
Affiliates &Standards Liaisons
Government&
EnterpriseMembers
Vendors
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 23
ICH CD Contents – ICH and Partner Material ICH EA Assurance White
Paper
ICH EA Framework – Final
ICH EA Templates – Overview
ICH Offerings – Summary and Contract Vehicles
ICH Overview Brief
ICH Communities of Interest
ICH Web Services Architecture Brief
Hubbard Decision research AIE Overview
EPA – OMB EA “To Be”
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 24
How to make it happen:
1. Sign up for ICH Membership 2. Review current Architecture/Capital
Planning/ Asset Management Concerns3. Solicit a detailed proposal from ICH4. Put together team members5. Create milestone list6. Path, Pace, Progress7. Get to Green
8. $ $ $ $ $ $ $
ICH Knowledge Repository
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 26
Example: OnLine Documents
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 27
Example: OnLine Documents
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 28
Example 2: Technology Area Criteria Selection
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 29
Example 2: Technology Area Criteria Management
04/08/23Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 30
Example 2: Technology Area Viewing
04/08/23 Copyright © 2002 The Interoperability Clearinghouse. All rights reserved.
31Interoperability Clearinghouse initiative established as medium for Government and Industry collaboration. DoD, IBM, Microsoft, Sun, Oracle, Lockheed, KPMG pledge support when established
Office of the Secretary of Defense validates & endorses ICH
ICH co-establishes ECCWG with DoD
DEPSECDEF adopts ICH ECCWG Recommendations
ICH given seat at Federal CIO Council
ICH launches SecurE-Biz.net Executive Summit
Interop WG establishes COTS Validation Methodology.
Healthcare, Defense, Aerospace, Media, & Commerce industries apply ICH method
9-11-00: ICH incorporates as 501C6 2000
1999
2001
2002
ICH Time Line
Enhance ICH-R for OMB & Fed CIO Community
US TRANSCOM Awards to Harris & ICH
Rick Smith Takes ICH Helm as COO
Financial Services Technology Consortia Team on NIST ATP
EPA, NUD, DISA, FEMA, Treasury engage
Critical Infrastructure Protection Validation Model
DARPA awards research grant for tool
ICH Repository (ICH-R) established
Architecture Assurance Methodology Formalized
ICH awarded GSA Schedule for Architecture Assurance Offerings
ICH establishes On-line Solutions Directory
2003