International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme 2: Toward the proactive management of safety Topic 2.1: Managing the transition to the implementation of a State Safety Programme (SSP) environment
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar. 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan. Theme 2: Toward the proactive management of safety Topic 2.1: Managing the transition to the implementation of a State Safety Programme (SSP) environment. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
International Civil Aviation OrganizationEuropean and North Atlantic Office
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar9-11 February 2010
Baku, Azerbaijan
Theme 2: Toward the proactive management of safetyTopic 2.1: Managing the transition to the implementation of a State Safety Programme (SSP) environment
2HLSC Preparatory meeting, Baku, Azerbaijan, 9-11 February 2010
Overview
The SSP introduces significant change to existing practices for the discharge of safety responsibilities by the State. The main elements of this change are the formalization of the safety risk management (SRM) and, particularly, the safety assurance (SA) functions by States. This, in turn, requires that the traditional prescriptive regulatory approach be complemented by a performance-based approach.
Basis- Definition of Safety Concept of Safety (Doc 9859)
Safety is the state in which the risk of harm to persons or property damage is reduced to, and maintained at or below, an acceptable level through a continuing process of hazard identification and risk management
States shall establish a State safety programme (SSP), in order to achieve an acceptable level of safety (ALoS) in civil aviation. The ALoS to be achieved shall be established by the State.
Establishment of ALoS – performance based approach· Does not replace legal, regulatory and other compliance based
mechanisms· Does not affect obligations of States, f.eg. compliance with SARPs
SSP - An integrated set of regulations and activities aimed at improving safety. An SSP is a management system for the management of safety by the State.
States shall require, as part of their State safety programme (SSP), that a [service provider] implement a safety management system (SMS) acceptable to the State that, as a minimum:a) identifies safety hazards;
b) ensures the implementation of remedial action necessary to maintain agreed safety performance
c) provides for continuous monitoring and regular assessment of the safety performance; and
d) aims at a continuous improvement of the overall performance of the safety management system
SSP development is based upon basic safety management principles (SRM and SA)
SSP is the bridge that closes the gap between the internal and external safety processes of a State and the internal safety processes of service providers
1. State safety policy and objectives1.1 State safety legislative framework1.2 State safety responsibilities and accountabilities1.3 Accident and incident investigation1.4 Enforcement policy
2. State safety risk management2.1 Safety requirements for service providers SMS2.2 Agreement on service providers safety performance
3. State safety assurance3.1 Safety oversight3.2 Safety data collection, analysis and exchange3.3 Safety data driven targeting of oversight on areas of greater concern
or need4. State safety promotion
4.1 Internal training, communication and dissemination of safety information
4.2 External training, communication and dissemination of safety information
Prescription Performance2.1 Safety requirements for
service providers SMS
The State has established the controls which govern how service providers will identify hazards and manage safety risks.
3.1 Safety oversight
The State has established mechanisms to ensure an effective monitoring of the eight critical elements of the safety oversight function.
2.2 Agreement on service providers’ safety performanceThe State has agreed with individual service providers on the safety performance of their SMS.
3.2 Safety data collection, analysis and exchangeThe State has established mechanisms to ensure the capture and storage of data on hazards and safety risks at both an individual and aggregate State’s level.
3.3 Safety data driven targeting of oversight on areas of greater concern or needThe State has established procedures to prioritize inspections, audits and surveys towards those areas of greater safety concern or need, as identified by the analysis of data on hazards, their consequences in operations, and the assessed safety risks.
Proposals in WP 4…States or regional safety organizations when appropriate, supported by ICAO as necessary: update the national or regional safety legislative
framework and specific regulations, as necessary define the participation of the various State aviation
organizations involved in specific activities related to the management of safety in the State
identify, define and document the requirements, responsibilities (compliance) and accountabilities (performance) necessary for the establishment and maintenance of the SSP
develop an enforcement policy that establishes the conditions under which service providers will internally resolve events indicative of lapses in safety performance
Safety data collection and processing system (SDCPS) – · Protection of information (Annex 13 Attachment E)· Common data platform , f.eg. ADREP taxonomy and
ECCAIRS- ECCAIRS training launched in March 2009.
Define ALoS (first initial, then, based on data, mature)
Develop methods to prioritize inspections, audits and surveys towards those areas of greater safety concern or need