Top Banner
Crustal Growth Model for IBM: Arc Crust Evolution, Continental Crust Formation, and Crust-Mantle Transformation across The Transparent Moh o IBM crust/mantle structure IBM crust/mantle structure Petrologic modeling Petrologic modeling New insights into New insights into Moho formation Moho formation and arc evolutio and arc evolutio Y. TATSUMI IFREE/JAMSTEC
24

IBM crust/mantle structure

Jan 15, 2016

Download

Documents

Rian

Crustal Growth Model for IBM: Arc Crust Evolution, Continental Crust Formation, and Crust-Mantle Transformation across The Transparent Moho. IBM crust/mantle structure. Petrologic modeling. New insights into Moho formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: IBM crust/mantle structure

Crustal Growth Model for IBM:Arc Crust Evolution, Continental Crust Formation,and Crust-Mantle Transformation across The Transparent Moho

• IBM crust/mantle structureIBM crust/mantle structure

• Petrologic modelingPetrologic modeling

• New insights into New insights into Moho formation Moho formation and arc evolution and arc evolution

Y. TATSUMIIFREE/JAMSTEC

Page 2: IBM crust/mantle structure

IBM Arc-Trench SystemIBM Arc-Trench System

- an intra-oceanic arc- with backarc basins- colliding with Japan arc

A A’

B B’

C

C’

- best surveyed arc esp. seismic structure

Page 3: IBM crust/mantle structure

Seismic Structure of Crust/MantleSeismic Structure of Crust/Mantle

Page 4: IBM crust/mantle structure

The Moho DiscontinuityThe Moho Discontinuity

• A sharp seismological boundary• exhibiting Vp jump from 6-7 to >8 km/s• defining the crust/mantle boundary

◆ Generally accepted as gabbro/peridotite boundary

Page 5: IBM crust/mantle structure

Sub-IBM Moho IdentificationSub-IBM Moho Identification

Sub-arc Moho: continuity from sub-BB ‘normal’ Moho seismic reflectors

Page 6: IBM crust/mantle structure

Characteristic Seismic StructureCharacteristic Seismic Structure

6.0 - 6.5 km/s middle crust similar to intermediate average continental crustsimilar to intermediate average continental crust 6.5-6.8 & 6.8-7.2 km/s lower crust layers6.5-6.8 & 6.8-7.2 km/s lower crust layers 7.4 - 7.7 km/s low-V uppermost mantle7.4 - 7.7 km/s low-V uppermost mantle reflectors near Moho and within upper mantlereflectors near Moho and within upper mantle

Page 7: IBM crust/mantle structure

Origin of Characteristics Middle Origin of Characteristics Middle CrustCrust

Mafic plutonics → too high-T

Boninitic plutonics: mantle-derived andesite model

 ← boninite magmatism in the initial IBM arc

Intermediate plutonics: mantle-derived basalt model

 ・ anatexis of pre-existing basaltic crust ・ mixing of mafic and felsic magmas

Page 8: IBM crust/mantle structure

Two Possible ModelsTwo Possible Models

Mantle-derivedbasalt model

Crustal melt or mixed magmarestite of m-crust melting

Remaininginitial basaltic crust

restites of basaltic crust melting

Mantle-derivedandesite model

boniniterestite of m-crust melting

Remaininginitial basaltic crust

high-T peridotite

BasalticCrustHigh-V

Low

er

crust

normalmantle

Upper crust

Middle crust

Low-V

low-Vmantle

Moho

Page 9: IBM crust/mantle structure

Arc Crust Evolution (basalt model): 1st StageArc Crust Evolution (basalt model): 1st Stage

CrustalAnatexis

Initial ArcCrust

Mantle

BasalticCrust

Moho

BasalticUnderplating

BasalticMagma

MeltMigration

Restite

Partial Meltuppermiddle

lower

low-VM

elting front

Sub-arc Moho = Fossil melting front

Cru

st C

ompo

nent

Page 10: IBM crust/mantle structure

Arc Crust Evolution (basalt model): 2nd StageArc Crust Evolution (basalt model): 2nd Stage

Remelting of middle crust to create a restetic low-V lower crust layer

Restite

Basaltic magma

Mantle

BasalticCrust

Upper crustMiddle crustLow-V

low-VRestite

High-V Lower crust

Moho

mormal

Crus

tul

Com

pone

nt

Page 11: IBM crust/mantle structure

Intermediate Middle Crust Intermediate Middle Crust CompositionComposition

Tanzawa Pluton: Obducted IBM Crust?Tanzawa Pluton: Obducted IBM Crust?

Page 12: IBM crust/mantle structure

IBM Magma CompositionsIBM Magma Compositions

Primary/differentiated Primary/differentiated basalt and felsic magmasbasalt and felsic magmas

Page 13: IBM crust/mantle structure

Volume of Restite/CumulateVolume of Restite/Cumulaterequired for creating middle and low-V lower crust required for creating middle and low-V lower crust

layerslayers

N. IzuN. Izu

Cumulate

Restite for andesitic MC

Felsic UC 246Basaltic UC 486

Andesitic MC 963

6.8 km/s LC 578(restite for felsic UC)

(Unit volume: km3/km)

Observed

1882

Anatexis

4157

1812

Mixing

4038

1477

Crustal Component >> Seismic L-Crust

Based on experimental constraints on melting regime

Page 14: IBM crust/mantle structure

Volume of Restite/CumulateVolume of Restite/Cumulaterequired for creating middle and low-V lower crust required for creating middle and low-V lower crust

layerslayers

Upper

MiddleLo

wer

‘Exc

ess’

‘Excess’ crustal component↓

Transformed into mantleacross

the transparent Moho

Page 15: IBM crust/mantle structure

Uncertainty in degree of meltingUncertainty in degree of melting

Andesitic melt: F~0.3 0.15<F<0.5

Page 16: IBM crust/mantle structure

Restite+Cumulate VolumeRestite+Cumulate Volume

Andesitic melt: 0.15<F<0.5

calculated

observedtransformed

Page 17: IBM crust/mantle structure

◆ Phase equilibria along inferred geotherm ← Perple_X (Connolly, 2005) ・ low GT, 800 and 0°C at Moho and surface; 1400°C at 70km ・ high GT, 200° higher T; 1400°C at 70km

◆ Vp and calculation ← Hacker et al. (2003)

◆ H2O: basalt, 0.1; intermediate partial melt, 0.3 wt%

← IBM tonalite; 10-20 vol% hornblende

Vp Vp & & Estimation Estimation for Petrologically Inferred Crustfor Petrologically Inferred Crust

Page 18: IBM crust/mantle structure

Phase Assemblages: basalt modelPhase Assemblages: basalt model

Low-T: Garnet within the lower crust High-T: Melting at the base of lower crustMedium-T: Most plausible

Page 19: IBM crust/mantle structure

Vp & Vp & Estimation Estimation

• Consistent with the observed seismic structure• Density inversion at the base of low-V upper mantle

Page 20: IBM crust/mantle structure

Phase Assemblages: boninite modelPhase Assemblages: boninite model

Uppermost mantle: peridotite not restite Middle crust: abundant hornbrende Uppermost lower crust: abundant pyroxenes

Page 21: IBM crust/mantle structure

Vp & Vp & Estimation (boninite model) Estimation (boninite model)

• Inconsistent with observed seismic structure• Extremely high-T is needed

Page 22: IBM crust/mantle structure

Oceanic Crust

Moho

Initial ArcCrust

Creation of the initial arc crust with a mafic composition

MiddleCrust

UpperCrust

TransformedCrustalComponent

Arc Evolution & Transparent MohoArc Evolution & Transparent Moho

Formation of the mature arc crust with an intermediate composition

Crust-mantle transformation across the transparent Moho

→ Arc crust evolution from mafic to intermediate compositions

Page 23: IBM crust/mantle structure

ConclusionConclusion • Sub-IBM seismic crust/mantle structure can be reasonably explained by melting and differentiation regime of arc basalt magmas

• Mafic crustal component, i.e., restites, will be transformed to the mantle during arc evolution

• Sub-arc Moho is transparent• Sub-arc Moho represents the fo

ssil melting front• Delamination of mafic restite wil

l take place at its base• Mafic initial arc crust will differe

ntiates into intermediate ‘continental crust’

Restite

Partial Melt

Petrologic

RemainingInitial Crust

Peridotites

CR

UST

MA

NTL

E

upper

middle

lower

low-V

Seismic

normal

Moho Cru

stal

Com

pone

nt

Page 24: IBM crust/mantle structure

ThanksThanks How to test this model?How to test this model? Direct sampling of deep crust with Chikyu….. Direct sampling of deep crust with Chikyu…..