8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
1/21
Alternative Data Report
Model Name: Supply Chain Management
Model Scenario: Gartner View
Report Date: Montag, 11. Mrz 2002
Alternatives Included:
Adexa
i2
SAP
NOTICE - THIS SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO YOU AS A TOOL WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO ITS SUITABILITY FOR YOUR PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL THERE BE LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES, WHETHER DIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR SPECIAL, ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE OR
INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREWITH. THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACHIEVING CALCULATED RESULTS REMAINS WITH YOU.
Entire contents copyright 2000-2001 Gartner, Inc. All rights reserved.
Adexa, Inc.
i2 Technologies
SAP R/3
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
2/21
212 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
3/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
Event Definition
3) Date ranges for event Yes Yes Yes
4) Event objective Yes Yes Yes
5) Event Structure - Advertising, temporary display, etc Yes Yes Yes
6) SKU selection Yes Yes Yes7) Price or "deal" - price at full price, discount with spending funds Yes Yes Yes
8) Event Status - planned, approved, completed Yes Yes Yes
9) Shipper allocation by ship date Yes Unscored Yes
10) Ability to calculate forecasted revenue and profitability based on time effective sellingprice.
Yes Yes Yes
Planning Workbench
12) Sales lift & incremental sales Yes Yes Yes
13) Margin & contribution Yes Yes Yes
14) SKU movement Yes Unscored Yes
15) Price & price elasticity Yes Yes Yes
16) Mix trending Yes No Yes
17) Assortment Yes No Yes
18) Suggested price/discount Future Yes Yes
19) Suggested order quantity for promotion Future No Yes
20) Software is capable of handling either wholesale demand and/or retail POS for anitem/account.
Yes Yes Yes
21) Software is capable of importing and separately maintaining multiple data streams - IRI,EMS, account POS, account inventory, orders, and ships.
Yes Yes Yes
22) Ability to define multiple hierarchical structures with several levels and to relate the levelsbetween hierarchies.
Yes Yes Yes
23) Software supports fast and reliable remote dial-in access. Yes Yes Yes
24) Security at the screen and data record level in order to separate confidential accountinformation.
Yes Yes Yes
25) Reports, graphs, planning, and analysis for variety of time periods - weeks, months,
quarters, fiscal and calendar year.
Yes Yes Yes
26) Strong, easy to use graphical support with multiple formats and views. Yes Yes Yes
27) Software capable to project account level replenishment volume based on causal input. Yes Yes Yes
28) Software capable to determine and indicate the impact of promotional/causal impact onreplenishment
Yes Yes Yes
29) Software is Y2K compliant. Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
213 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
4/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
30) Users can access system on or off-line, software is capable to upload new informationonce user is back on-line.
Yes Yes Yes
31) Integrated Account Planning and Forecasting functionality Yes Yes Yes
Promotion Tracking and Analysis
33) Documentation and annotation of event performance Yes Yes Yes
34) Cost of event (advertising, displays, "deal") Future Yes Yes
35) Sales Lift (including trough after sale) Yes Yes Yes
36) Margin, contribution Future Yes Yes
37) $ cost per incremental sale Future Yes Yes
38) Plan to actual variance analysis Yes Yes Yes
39) Cannibalization between - brands, sub-brands, competitive brands, accounts Future No Yes
40) Capability to analyze sales data to test for interaction Yes No Yes
41) Account Performance Monitoring - the ability to compare plan to actual data (orders,ships, POS) on a weekly and monthly basis using exception reporting.
Yes Yes Yes
42) Updating Account Marketing Funds actual spending for each account. Yes Yes Yes
New Product Introduction
45) Select an existing product to model the demand. Yes Yes Yes
46) Replace an existing product. Yes Yes Yes
47) Suggest an order for pipe-fill. Yes Unscored Yes
48) User specified cannibalization of other products. Future Unscored Yes
Product Discontinuation
50) View on hand retail and FG inventory. Yes Yes Yes
51) Estimate depletion date at retail based on a user-specified level. Yes Yes Yes
52) Suggest markdown to speed depletion. Future Yes Yes
53) Multiple versions of promotional calendar and account plan. Yes No Yes
54) Variance analysis between multiple versions of the account plan. Yes No Yes
55) Budget setup and tracking of Account Marketing Funds. Yes Yes Yes
56) Planning and analysis at account level with the ability to aggregate to higher levels. Yes Yes Yes
57) Viewing of multiple windows, which can be customized to user preferences. Yes Yes Yes
58) Annotation of data outliers in both tabular and graphical formats. Yes Yes Yes
59) Deploy tables to explode the account plans to lower levels of detail. Yes Yes Yes
60) Accept adjustments/overrides with annotations, but maintain adjusted history for use in
Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
214 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
5/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
performance analysis.
61) Perform units to dollars conversion ($, gross margin, contribution) in the account plan. Yes Yes Yes
62) Flexible/user definable time horizons. Yes Yes Yes
63) Rapid generation of analytics and reports at various levels of the account plan. Yes Yes Yes
64) Conversion between unit of measures (shippers, dozens, packages, units, dollars). Yes Yes Yes
65) Ability to generate suggested replenishment orders. Yes Unscored Yes
66) Account planning and analysis can be done in either batch or real-time mode. Yes Custom Yes
67) User definable on-line help. Yes Custom Yes
68) Assortment/SKU Management Tools. Yes Custom Yes
69) Ranking of products by various metrics (turns, margin, contribution, etc.). Yes Custom Yes
70) User defined method of exploding summary level adjustments and overrides to lowerlevels.
Yes Yes Yes
71) Ability to add user-defined algorithms using constants and variable data. Yes Yes Yes
History Maintenance:
74) Provides the ability to maintain both turn (base) and promotional history separately. Yes Yes Yes
75) Provides the ability to utilize point-of-sale history in user-defined time buckets that can
differ by forecasting entity (e.g. Item/Channel/Region or Item/DC). Example: Forecastfor some items weekly, others monthly, etc.
Yes Yes Yes
76) Provides the ability to utilize point-of-sale history. Yes Yes Yes
77) Provides the ability to use POS data for creating a baseline forecast. Yes Yes Yes
Master File Characteristics:
79) Ability to maintain a multi-level customer hierarchy: Region, country, distribution channel,customer (customer group), ship-to
Yes Yes Yes
80) Ability to maintain a multi-level product hierarchy: Technology platform, product platform,product code, product
Yes Yes Yes
81) Ability to add/change and delete nodes in above hierarchies Yes Yes Yes
82) Product/customer hierarchy change is automatically adjusted upon interface from thetransaction systems
Yes Yes Future
83) Ability to use the history of one item to generate the forecast for another: define period oftime, define multiplier
Yes Yes Yes
84) Ability to link the historical demand of one item to another as a replacement item:cannibalization
Yes Yes Yes
85) Specified items can be identified as "manual only": priority items for planning Yes Unscored Yes
86) Ability to define a promotion template for use across organizations Future Yes Yes
87) Ability to perform ABC analysis on future requirements for independent demand Yes Unscored Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
215 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
6/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
88) Ability to direct planning efforts by the priority of an item value to the organization: focusplanning resources by ABC
Yes Unscored Yes
89) Ability to define forecast parameters (model type, period, beta..) for a group of products(such as product platform)
Yes Unscored Yes
90) Mass updates to product or location hierarchy are possible Yes Yes Yes
91) User definable defaults for forecast selection Yes Yes Yes92) Ability to flag products which will no longer be forecasted, but need to be visible for
planning purposes.Yes Unscored Yes
93) Ability to restate history (hierarchy restructuring) Yes Yes Yes
94) Data smoothing capability Yes Yes Yes
Forecast generation:
96) Create plan for a specific portion of the planning hierarchies: country-product code Yes Yes Yes
97) Ability to create versions of plans: plan per period Yes Yes Yes
98) Create a number of different forecasts (e.g., marketing, field sales, etc.) in each cycleprior to generating one final consolidated forecast to send to the SOP application
Yes Yes Yes
99) Ability to compare between plan periods: show plan from previous period in currentperiod plan.
Yes Yes Yes
100) Ability to use multiple actual values in statistical forecast adjustments: orders, shipments. Yes Yes Yes
101) Ability to enter adjustments into plan Yes Yes Yes
102) Ability to define different types promotional activity and its affect on the demand of anitem, not included in future forecast data source
Yes Yes Yes
103) Ability to track forecast adjustments, by user Yes Yes Future
104) Comments fields available to document adjustments by forecast value and time period Yes Yes Yes
105) Ability to convert between predefined item units of measure: shipping units, sales units,stocking units
Yes Yes Yes
106) Ability to display forecast value in currency Yes Yes Yes
107) Ability to convert between predefined currencies using predefined conversions Yes Yes Yes
108) Statistical model identifies past promotions and events, and separates the lift associatedwith those events from turn business
Yes Yes Yes
109) Provides the ability to model the impact of external drivers of demand (i.e., pricechanges, econometric changes, competitive actions, weather, etc.)
Yes Yes Yes
110) Provides extensive life cycle forecasting, offering the ability to select from a library of pastproducts and merge their life cycles to create new life cycle.
Yes Yes Yes
111) Provides the ability to make modifications to the forecast by "drag & drop" Yes No Future
112) Provides the ability to enter budget targets for a specified period and have the forecastingalgorithm modify the original statistical forecast identifying the most likely periods to makeup the difference between statistical forecast and the budgeted fo
Future Custom Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
216 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
7/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
113) Provides the ability to generate statistical forecasts at multiple levels of aggregation (i.e.,country, region, district, etc.) simultaneously.
Yes Yes Yes
114) Provides the ability to reconcile a statistical forecast generated at different levels ofaggregation, by spreading the differences from the aggregate to the detail level (topdown), or by spreading the differences from the detail level to the aggregate
Yes Yes Yes
115) Ability for the statistical algorithm to react quickly to changes in demand. Yes Yes Yes
116) Ability to enter notes associated with changes to the history and forecast. Yes Yes Yes
117) Ability to identify and save different components of the forecast for analysis (i.e., baseforecast, seasonality, manual override, promotional quality, etc.)
Yes Yes Yes
118) Ability to introduce new products, and model the cannibalization of existing productsbased upon the new product entering the market.
Future Yes Yes
119) Modify the statistical forecast. Yes Yes Yes
120) Provides the ability to override the forecast. Yes Yes Yes
121) Provides the ability to automatically add an override at any user-defined level ofaggregation and automatically spread the override down to the individual forecastingSKUs.
Yes Yes Yes
122) Supports multiple means of spreading the override (e.g. base forecast, total forecast,user-defined allocation).
Yes Yes Yes
123) Provides the ability to add forecast overrides in multiple units of measure (e.g. salesdollars, planning units, eaches, etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
124) Provides promotional profiling capabilities, allowing the user to copy past promotions, andcompose new ones.
Future Yes Yes
125) Provides the ability to override the forecast in user-defined time buckets that may differfrom the forecasting period.
Yes No Yes
Supports "what-if" simulations to determine the impact of:
127) changes to statistical parameters Yes Yes Yes
128) changes in case volumes and the effect on sales dollars Yes Yes Yes
129) changes in forecast volume and the effect on inventory levels and manufacturing plans Yes Yes Yes
130) Provides the ability to commit simulations to the live database to avoid rework. Yes Yes Yes
131) Allow real-time updates to the forecast via remote dial-in. Yes Yes Yes
132) Interface with a promotion planning tool that enables mobile sales executives to plantrade programs with partners, monitor trade fund balances and evaluate promotions
results.
Yes Yes Yes
133) Interfaces with a tool that calculates incremental lift for trade partners from past POS dataand incorporate lift into statistical forecast.
Future Yes Yes
134) Calculates the error in the override forecast vs. actual observed. Yes Yes Yes
135) Captures lagged forecast for user specified time periods. Yes Yes Yes
136) Provides the ability to report forecast performance at all levels of aggregation (e.g. brand,
Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
217 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
8/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
sales region, category, etc.
137) Provides extensive exception/tracking reports Yes Yes Yes
138) Provides the ability to evaluate the forecast Yes Yes Yes
139) Provides graphical exception reports to allow quick analysis of forecasting problems. Yes Yes Yes
140) Ability of internal/external communication of the forecast Yes Yes Yes
141) Provides the ability to do flexible, ad hoc aggregations of forecast and history informationbased of user-defined attributes for viewing, reporting and graphing.
Yes Yes Yes
142) Provides the ability to view, report and graph history and forecast in user-defined units ofmeasure.
Yes Yes Yes
143) Provides the ability to translate the forecast from one unit of measure to another forplanning purposes.
Yes Yes Yes
144) Provides the ability to create flexible ad-hoc and exception/ranking reports at any level ofaggregation.
Yes Yes Yes
145) Provides the ability to support and save multiple simulations. Yes Yes Yes
146) Is fully integrated with the distribution planning and manufacturing planning modules. Yes Yes Yes
147) Ability to quickly and easily create new items and locations. Yes Yes Yes
148) System-generated forecast using demand history (retail sales, customer order history,shipment history).
Yes Yes Yes
149) Generate variable lead time for domestic and off shore production. Yes Yes Yes150) Ability to compare forecast to strategic plan Yes Yes Yes
151) Ability to define user groups and administer security by user group rather than individualuser
Yes Unscored Yes
152) Security access to on-line screens allows some individuals update/add/delete accesswhile others may only view information without update capability
Yes Yes Yes
153) Modify system generated statistical forecasting parameters. Yes Yes Yes
154) Create forecast by flexible rolling timeframes. Yes Yes Yes
155) Create forecast by customized grouping levels. Yes Yes Yes
156) The ability to import sales forecasts into a long range plan and enable users to visualize,manipulate, and combine such data with data from other demand sources.
Yes Yes Yes
157) Unlimited forward planning horizons with user definable time buckets Yes Yes Yes
158) Forecast by customer store location plan using planogram assortments (store floor layout
plan).
No No Yes
159) Estimate the impact of external factors (i.e. economic, competitive, fashion trends,strategy, market research) from customizable attribute database.
Yes Yes Yes
160) Ability to isolate seasonality trends from historical data Yes Yes Yes
161) Ability to use multiple variables in forecasting methods. Yes Yes Yes
162) Ability to compare various statistical techniques and automatically select the method with
Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
218 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
9/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
the lowest forecasting error.
163) Allow manual overrides of the statistical forecast at any level. Yes Yes Yes
164) Generate and distribute sales forecast by territory, account and store location. Yes Yes Yes
165) Generate forecast for smaller accounts under Yes Yes Yes
166) Analyze past marketing events to understand factors that impact demand (cause-effect
and event modeling).
Yes Yes Yes
167) Price discounts by individual accounts utilizing a coding scheme (i.e. account A 10%,account B 15%).
Future Custom Yes
168) Estimate impact of promotional programs by sales channels. Yes Yes Yes
169) Estimate impact of price changes, segregating promotional demand history from regularprice transactions.
Yes Yes Yes
170) Data profiling - create new product forecast by using sales history of 'like' product. Yes Yes Yes
171) Ability for user to defined calculations between rows Yes Yes Yes
172) Ability to modify multiple time periods (selected) by percentage, absolute amount,addition, multiplication, copy another line
Yes Custom Yes
173) Ability to save a "what-if" forecast without implementing it or sending it to the S&OP tool Yes Yes Yes
174) Can the system provide forecasts at different levels (long-term forecasts and short-termoperational)
Yes Yes Yes
175) Ability to link long and short term forecasts. Yes Yes Yes176) Perform calculations on/between forecast values Yes Yes Yes
177) Ability to copy/merge/compare different forecast versions Yes Yes Yes
178) Ability to forecast items not currently in database Yes Custom Yes
179) Net Change - Pass to optimization at any level necessary (i.e. 1 product, 1 customer) Yes Yes Yes
180) The ability to automatically consume the sales forecast with live orders. Yes Yes Yes
181) Multiple linear regression forecast: Ability to incorporate other factors (besides historicaldemand) into the forecast (economic indicators, market size changes..)
Yes Yes Yes
182) Rolling average forecast Yes Yes Yes
183) Seasonality factors in the forecast Yes Yes Yes
184) System can automatically select an optimal forecasting method Yes Yes Yes
185) Flexible - different forecast methods over time for a same product code Yes Yes Yes
186) System will determine and adjust for outliers Yes Yes Yes
187) Ability to define lifecycles estimates and assign the estimates to item or group of items Yes Custom Yes
188) Ability to perform statistical analysis on more than just historical sales Yes Yes Yes
189) Life cycle forecasting: ability to model/indicate the position of item or group of items withinan established life cycle statistically and relative to a defined product life cycle plan.
Yes Custom Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
219 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
10/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
190) Maintain life cycle profiles by any level in the hierarchy. Yes Yes Yes
191) Ability to forecast slow moving and sporadic demand. Yes Yes Yes
192) Ability to override forecast. Yes Yes Yes
193) Can the forecasting system consider cannibalization of a p roduct by another product? Yes Yes Yes
194) Does the system allow the forecasting of dependent demand? Yes Yes Yes
Aggregation/Disaggregation:
196) Ability to create forecast from the top down an any product group/customer group level:Disaggregation
Yes Yes Yes
197) Ability to set aggregation percentages based on another forecast value: shipments Yes Yes Yes
198) Set disaggregation percentages manually Yes Yes Yes
199) Update disaggregation proportions automatically after change in lower level Yes Yes Yes
200) Disaggregating group forecasting by future period percentage: requirements Yes Yes Yes
201) Disaggregating group forecasting by historical period percentage: consumption Yes Yes Yes
202) Forecast data aggregated from any level (product, regional, sub-component) to any otherlevel
Yes Yes Yes
203) Ability to compare differences before invoking a desegregation or aggregation otherlevels
Yes Yes Yes
204) Ability to aggregate values up by different methods than simple summation: average,max, min
Yes Yes Yes
205) Ability to aggregate values over time in different methods than simple summation:average, max, individual value.: advanced time bucket aggregation
Yes Yes Yes
Guardbands for Changes:
207) Signal/flag will automatically be triggered by a broken guardband to alert the forecastmanager to changes
Yes Yes Yes
208) Exception Signal will be active and pop up on the screen and/or e-mail Yes Yes Yes
209) Cumulative changes not exceeding guardbands are available as a daily change screenand report
Yes Yes Yes
210) Ability to define forecast exceptions parameters to alert the planner when actuals deviatefrom planned by certain percentages
Yes Yes Yes
211) Ability to signal if forecast constantly has a bias. Yes Yes Yes
212) Ability to group exceptions to apply to generally to groups of materials Yes Yes Yes
Time/Geography:
214) User-selectable forecast horizons Yes Yes Yes
215) Ability to forecast in time at varying period (accounting periods, annually, quarterly,monthly)
Yes Yes Yes
216) Ability to convert between time buckets Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2110 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
11/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
217) Customer-specific forecasting at the city/regional/national and multinational levels Yes Yes Yes
218) A product, family or group forecast can be frozen for a user-defined period Yes Yes Future
219) Does the forecasting system allows the user to specify the forecast horizon to which anyadjustments apply?
Yes Yes Yes
Data Viewing and Reporting:
221) Display forecast information, in tabular or graphical format, for user specified time framesand categories (forecasted demand,actual orders,variance,actualshipments,backlog,inventory position,WIP,FG,etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
222) View sales forecast at all standard and customized level of detail. Yes Yes Yes
223) Display all relevant forecast information for a specified item on a single screen. Yes Yes Yes
224) Depict inventory/replenishment requirements from forecast information. Yes Yes Yes
225) Segregate order and shipment information by promotional campaigns and special events. Yes Yes Yes
226) Customization of forecast reports. Yes Yes Yes
227) Multiple graphs per page. Yes Yes Future
228) Ability to generate queries of various data as needed Yes Yes Yes
229) Reports generated from views Yes Yes Yes
230) All views available to print as reports Yes Yes Yes
231) Views are user definable Yes Yes Yes
232) Ability to compare forecast to business plan Yes Yes Yes
233) Ability to calculate forecasted revenue and profitability based on time effective sellingprice.
Yes Yes Yes
234) Ability to display or report data from other databases without having to import the datainto the application database
Custom No Yes
Forecast Management and Monitoring:
236) Global forecast adjustment from top-down and buttom-up. Yes Yes Yes
237) Roll up sales forecast into overall forecast. Yes Yes Yes
238) Compare roll-up forecast with statistically generated forecast calculated at an aggregatelevel.
Yes Yes Yes
239) Create and manage forecasting scenarios (e.g., aggressive, conservative, moderate). Yes Yes Yes
240) Automated monitoring of forecast performance. Yes Yes Yes241) User specified method of deviation metrics. Future Yes Yes
242) Customizable warning levels of forecast variance. Yes Yes Yes
243) Customized consumption of forecast by customer orders for specified order types (e.g.,blanket orders should not be consumed).
Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2111 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
12/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
244) Production planning group's ability to view forecast information and performance. Yes Yes Yes
245) Control forecast release to master schedule. Yes Yes Yes
246) Calculate guideline safety stock. Yes Yes Yes
247) Forecast change lockout, within user defined window, prior to release to ProductionPlanning.
Yes Yes Yes
Web-enabled, predefined level of system access to approved users to:
250) enter sales forecast Yes Yes Yes
251) generate replenishment requests Yes Yes Yes
252) provide sales and order information Yes Yes Yes
253) view/query forecast information Yes Yes Yes
General Requirements:
255) Maintain (add/change/delete) scanned sale data by store. Yes Yes Yes
256) Maintain item shipment information to stores. Yes Yes Yes
257) Maintain item shipment information to Distribution Centers (DC). Yes Yes Yes
258) Develop forecast by store. Yes Yes Yes
259) Develop forecast by Store Keeping Unit (SKU). Yes Yes Yes
260) Develop forecast by DC. Yes Yes Yes
261) Develop forecast by DC, by Marketing Area, by store, by SKU. Yes Yes Yes
262) Create forecast from POS history. Yes Yes Yes
263) Create multiple forecasts from POS, order and shipment history. Yes Yes Yes
264) User defined import/export data format. Yes Yes Yes
265) Create forecast based on user defined models which incorporate statistical formulas. Yes Yes Yes
266) View sales history by manufacturing division, plant, DC, Marketing Area, store, SKU andby "what-if" scenario.
Yes Yes Yes
267) View sales item quantity history by manufacturing division, plant, DC, Marketing Area,store, SKU and by
Yes Yes Yes
268) Adjustment of base forecast and forecast history. Yes Yes Yes
269) Maintain (add/change/delete) seasonality parameters. Yes Yes Yes
270) Maintain (add/change/delete) safety stock parameters. Yes Yes Yes
271) Maintain (add/change/delete) sales promotion parameters. Yes Yes Yes
272) Maintain (add/change/delete) new items. Yes Yes Yes
273) Maintain (add/change/delete) discontinued items. Yes Yes Yes
274) Flexible calendar definition (by week by period). Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2112 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
13/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
275) Manual selection of "best fit" model for a given SKU or category. Yes Yes Yes
276) Auto selection of "best fit" model for a given SKU or category. Yes Yes Yes
277) Ability to convert from one SKU unit of measure to another. Yes Yes Yes
278) User defined units of measure. Yes Yes Yes
279) User defined conversion parameters. Yes Yes Yes280) Maintain (add/change/delete) audit of history adjustments. No Yes Future
281) View base forecast by SKU, day, week and period. Yes Yes Yes
282) Ability to export the forecast to other systems. Yes Yes Yes
283) Manage by exception functionality. Yes Yes Yes
284) User-defined data views (e.g., user defined columns, headings, etc.). Yes Yes Yes
285) Mass update capability. Yes Yes Yes
286) Online help consistent with hard copy user documentation and manuals. Yes Yes Yes
287) Documentation and software upgrades distribution via Internet. Yes Yes Yes
288) Forecast to actual comparison. Yes Yes Yes
289) Forecast to shipment comparison. Yes Yes Yes
290) Forecast to scan sales (POS) comparison. Yes Yes Yes291) Compare side by side like items sales by SKU, category, store, market area and DC. Yes Yes Yes
292) Compare forecast to actuals by user defined causal event. Yes No Yes
293) Compare forecast sales to prior year forecast and prior year actuals by user definedcausal event.
Yes No Yes
294) Compare side by side promotion performance by marketing area, store, category andSKU.
Yes Yes Yes
295) Sort data views. Yes Unscored Yes
296) View forecast exceptions. Yes No Yes
297) Trend information in numerical report and graphical form. Yes Yes Yes
298) Differentiation between base and promotional movement. Yes Yes Yes
299) Data aggregation by plant, DC, market area, store, category and SKU. Yes Yes Yes
300) Data explosion by plant, DC, market area, store, category and SKU. Yes Yes Yes301) Unit of measure conversion of items during data aggregation. Yes Yes Future
302) Determine percentage of sales by SKU, category, store, market area and DC. Yes Yes Yes
303) Electronic notes attachment to given forecast. Yes Yes Yes
304) Sophisticated forecasting algorithm(s) capable of identifying and measuring product
Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2113 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
14/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
seasonality and trends for even new or low volume products.
305) Ability to forecast in quarters or years than calculate monthly distribution by exploding theseasonality model.
Yes Yes Yes
306) Support summarization, forecasting at summary levels, and reconciliation to detail orhigher level summaries as well as simultaneous top down and bottom up forecasts forcomparison.
Yes Yes Yes
307) Support multiple forecast model scenarios for what if analysis and performancemeasurement.
Yes Yes Yes
308) Ability to maintain item level demand data by demand type and use to build the forecastmodel.
Yes Yes Yes
309) Process and maintain imported causal factors with associated dates throughout theforecasting model.
Yes Yes Yes
310) Generate replenishment model with causal influences. Yes Yes Yes
311) Sophisticated, flexible and easy to use graphical capabilities, including multiple formatchoices and variable time blocks (month, quarter, etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
312) Support multiple data streams, such as wholesale demand and/or retail POS information,on item/account basis.
Yes Yes Yes
313) The simultaneous forecast calculation of several items with similar behavior. Yes Yes Yes
314) Import and accept demand projections from the sales organization, also summarize andreconcile to the statistical forecast.
Yes Yes Yes
315) Compare latest forecast to prior versions and indicate statistically significant variancesand variance analysis for multiple forecast scenarios. Yes Yes Yes
316) Monitor and report variance of current forecast model from actual weekly demand anddetermine if the cumulative error is statistically significant.
Yes Yes Yes
317) Automated calculation and reporting of monthly forecast error with a lag time equivalentto the inventory planning lead-time (at item level).
Yes Yes Yes
318) Automated calculation and reporting of cumulative forecast error for the time equivalentto the inventory planning lead-time for the inventory creation cycle (equal to the lagperiod).
Yes Yes Yes
319) User defined forecast error thresholds. Yes Yes Yes
320) Data outliers annotation in both tabular and graphical formats. Yes No Future
321) Ability to explode the forecast to lower levels of detail (2 to 3) that are not forecast levels,such as weeks, sizes, shipping locations, etc.
Yes Yes Yes
322) Ability to separate the forecast by distribution method - full case warehouse, cross-dockand direct store delivery (DSD).
Yes Yes Yes
323) Ability to group product dimensions (style/colors) by behavior group and calculate theseason behavior pattern for the group.
Yes Yes Yes
324) Designate portions of the product line as complete in forecasting and partially releaserevised forecasts to production planning.
Yes Unscored Yes
325) User definable on-line help. Yes Custom Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2114 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
15/21
1.1.3.1 Global Functionality - Not Industry Specific (100,0%) (Cont...)
1.1.3.1.1 DEMAND PLANNING (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
326) The forecast generation in batch and real-time modes. Yes Yes Yes
327) Support the addition of user-defined forecasting algorithms. Yes Yes Yes
328) User defined method of adjustments/overrides explosion from summary to lower levels. Yes Yes Yes
329) Supports the ability to specify user-defined forecast calendars (weekly, monthly, 4-4-5,etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
330) Provides the ability to maintain user defined SKU attributes (e.g. ABC class, size, unit ofmeasure, units/pallet etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
331) Supports the ability to aggregate forecast data based on any user-defined attribute. Yes Yes Yes
332) Provides the capability to implement a consensus override to the forecast. Yes Yes Yes
333) Provides the ability to override the forecast. Yes Yes Yes
334) Provides the ability to add an override at any user-defined level of aggregation andsystematically spread the override down to the individual forecasting SKUs.
Yes Yes Yes
335) Supports multiple means of spreading the override (e.g. base forecast, total forecast,user-defined allocation, etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
336) Provides the ability to add forecast overrides in multiple units of measure (e.g. salesdollars, planning units, eaches, etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
337) Provides promotional profiling capabilities, allowing the user to copy past promotions, andcompose new ones.
Yes Yes Yes
338) Provides the ability to override the forecast in user-defined time buckets that may differ
from the forecasting period.
Yes Yes Yes
339) Provides the ability to import forecast overrides. Yes Yes Yes
340) Supports the capability to manage forecasts by specifying discontinue and begin dates. Yes Yes Yes
341) Provides the ability to do ad hoc aggregations of forecast and history information basedon user-defined attributes for viewing, reporting and graphing.
Yes Yes Yes
342) Generates exceptions to identify outliers and forecast bias. Yes Yes Yes
343) Calculates the error in the statistical forecast vs. actual. Yes Yes Yes
344) Calculates the error in the override forecast vs. actual. Yes Yes Yes
345) Captures lagged forecast for user specified time periods. Yes Yes Yes
346) Reports forecast performance at all levels of aggregation (e.g. brand, sales region,category etc.).
Yes Yes Yes
1.6.1 Analyze End-to-End SC Performance (40,0%)
1.6.1.1 ANALYZE
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
1) Proven methodology to support clients' post-implementation review process (6-12 monthsafter completion of implementation)
Yes Yes Yes
Review evaluates effectiveness in the following areas:
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2115 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
16/21
1.6.1 Analyze End-to-End SC Performance (40,0%) (Cont...)
1.6.1.1 ANALYZE (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
3) Information Technology Environment and Tools (including SCP software) Yes Yes Yes
4) New SC processes (e.g., planning vs expediting, delegating, effective communication,one number system, etc.)
Yes Yes Yes
5) Level of business functions' integration into the SC planning process Yes Yes Yes
6) Organizational structure and skill set analysis Yes Yes Yes
7) Performance Benchmarking process Yes Yes Yes8) Change Management - responsiveness to business changes Yes Yes Yes
9) Continuous Process Improvements Yes Yes Yes
10) Formal SC Effectiveness Survey Yes Yes Yes
11) Formal SC Effectiveness Interview Yes Yes Yes
12) Method and tool(s) to feed quantified review results into SC Performance datawarehouse
Yes Yes Yes
13) DS tool(s) for quarterly analysis/audit of SC performance Yes Yes Yes
14) Business-process-specific analyses based on data from a variety of disparate sources(SCP,ERP,MES,WMS, POS,etc)
Yes Yes Yes
15) Causality analysis Yes Yes Yes
16) Ad-hoc multi-dimensional browsing and reporting Yes Yes Yes
17) Extendible and configurable components Yes Yes Yes18) Libraries of pre-defined measures and metrics Yes Yes Yes
19) Pre-built analysis, logic and data marts Yes Yes Yes
20) Multiple delivery modes Yes Yes Yes
Change Management template or tools provided for:
22) Analysis of client's corporate culture
23) Analysis of client's/employee skill set
24) Analysis of client's current business processes
25) Gap Analysis to bridge to necessary software environment for maximum ROI return
26) Road Map to bridge environment (culture/skills/business processes) gap
1.6.2 Measure End-to-End SC Efectiveness (60,0%)
1.6.2.1 MEASURE
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
1) "Closed loop" SC performance tracking and adjustment capability - adjust SC systemparameters based on performance metrics in pursuit of continuous improvements
Yes Yes Yes
Standard, consistently defined (across entire SC at planning and execution level)
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2116 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
17/21
1.6.2 Measure End-to-End SC Efectiveness (60,0%) (Cont...)
1.6.2.1 MEASURE (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
metrics to baseline and measure ongoing SC performance (for definition ofmetrics, refer to "Definitions" section of this document), including:
3) Actual-to-theoretical Cycle Time Yes Yes Yes
4) Capacity Utilization Yes Yes Yes
5) Cash-to-cash Cycle Time Yes Yes Yes
6) Commodity Management Profile Yes Yes Yes7) Cumulative Source/Make Cycle Time Yes Yes Yes
8) Delivery Performance to Customer Request Date Yes Yes Yes
9) Fill Rates Yes Yes Yes
10) Finished Goods Inventory Carrying Costs Yes Yes Yes
11) Finished Goods Inventory Days of Supply Yes Yes Yes
12) Finished Goods Shrinkage Yes Yes Yes
13) Forecast Accuracy Yes Yes Yes
14) Forecast Cycle Yes Yes Yes
15) Inventory Accuracy Yes Yes Yes
16) Inventory Carrying Costs Yes Yes Yes
17) Inventory Cycle-counting Accuracy Yes Custom Yes18) Inventory Days of Supply Yes Yes Yes
19) Inventory Obsolescence as a % of Total Inventory Yes Custom Yes
20) Make Flexibility Yes Custom Yes
21) Material Management and Planning Costs as a % of Material Acquisition Costs Yes Custom Yes
22) Material Overhead Cost Per Dollar of Material Expenditure Yes Custom Yes
23) Number of End Products/SKUs Yes Yes Yes
24) Number of Supply Sources Yes Yes Yes
25) Order Management Costs Yes Custom Yes
26) Order Management Cycle Time Yes Custom Yes
27) Plan Stability Yes Yes Yes
28) Product & Process Data Accuracy (BOM, Routings, Planning Factors, etc.) Yes Yes Yes29) Production Plan Adherence Yes Yes Yes
30) RM & WIP Inventory Days of Supply Yes Yes Yes
31) RM Days of Supply Yes Yes Yes
32) RM Inventory Carrying Costs Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2117 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
18/21
1.6.2 Measure End-to-End SC Efectiveness (60,0%) (Cont...)
1.6.2.1 MEASURE (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
33) Re-plan Cycle Time Yes Yes Yes
34) Return on Assets Yes Custom Yes
35) Shrinkage Yes Custom Yes
36) Source Flexibility Yes Custom Yes
37) Supplier Cycle Time Yes Custom Yes38) Supplier Fill Rate Yes Yes Yes
39) Supplier on-time Delivery Performance Yes Yes Yes
40) Supply Chain Finance Costs Yes Custom Yes
41) Total Logistics Cost Yes Yes Yes
42) Total WIP Inventory Days of Supply (DOS) Yes Yes Yes
43) Value Added Employee Productivity Yes Custom Yes
44) WIP Shrinkage Yes Yes Yes
45) Work-In-Process (WIP) Inventory Carrying Costs Yes Yes Yes
46) Benchmarking tool(s) for measuring clients' SC performance against past performance,industry best practices and competitors
Yes Custom Yes
47) Central data warehouse to store baseline and quarterly performance data from all levels
(planning and execution systems) across the SC
Yes Yes Yes
48) DS tool(s) to feed and access SC performance data warehouse Yes Custom Yes
1.7.3 Available to Promise (25,0%)
1.7.3.1 AVAILABLE TO PROMISE (ATP)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
1) Perform real-time order quotation based on simultaneous consideration of material,capacity, firm orders, forecast and real demand production
Yes Yes Yes
2) Allow users to quote the quantity that can be delivered by a requested date byconsidering all constraints
Yes Yes Yes
3) Allow users to quote the date by which the total requested quantity can be delivered byconsidering all constraints
Yes Yes Yes
4) Continuously monitor consumption against allocation Yes Yes Yes
5) Automatically adjust allocations to maximize user-defined business objectives Yes Yes Yes
6) Ability to check ATP for multiple distribution centers and production points that may beaffected by the customer order
Yes Yes Yes
7) Ability to process ATP for multiple line items at time of order entry. Yes Yes Yes
8) Supports calculation of ATP at an "aggregate" level for Make to Order SKU's Yes Yes Yes
9) Supports the calculation of ATP at the SKU for Make to Stock SKU's Yes Yes Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2118 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
19/21
1.7.3 Available to Promise (25,0%) (Cont...)
1.7.3.1 AVAILABLE TO PROMISE (ATP) (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
10) Real-time ability to simultaneously check product configuration, substitution and deliveryalternatives
Yes Yes Custom
11) Real-time ability to offer alternative products or options based on product availability andpre-set rules
Yes Yes Yes
12) Real-time ability to confirm product delivery Yes Yes Custom
13) Allocate critical resources (materials, capacity, delivery, storage) to highest prioritycustomers based on user defined prioritization
Yes Yes Yes
14) Configure-to-deliver capabilities to ensure that critical resources (e.g., transportation andproduction capacity) are available prior to customer commitment
Yes Yes Yes
15) Real-time connection to Manufacturing Planning and Production Scheduling to resolvescheduling conflicts
Yes Yes Yes
16) Real-time access to up-to-the-minute information regarding inventory, manufacturingplans, and material availability through integration with Constrained Enterprise Planning
Yes Yes Yes
17) Ability to pull desired quantities and available dates directly into sales order Yes Yes Yes
Ability to display available to promise schedule by:
19) date buckets Yes Yes Yes
20) allocation Yes Yes Yes
21) System supports product allocation reporting indicating total demand Yes Yes Yes
22) System supports real-time order quotation based on simultaneous consideration of all SC
constraints via direct link to ERP/transaction system(s)
Yes Yes Yes
23) System supports simulation of ATP material limits and supplier lead times Yes Yes Yes
24) System supports simulation of actual production loads competing with the order Yes Yes Yes
25) Real-Time Customer Commitment capability, including: Yes Yes Yes
26) wholesale and retail customers Yes Yes Yes
27) consumer home delivery orders Yes Yes Yes
28) service and installation Yes Yes Yes
29) Supports Product Finishing Postponement Strategy Unscored Unscored Yes
30) Supports Product Allocation Unscored Unscored Yes
31) Supports Promo v. Open Stock Product Substitution Unscored Unscored No
32) Balancing integrated with Enterprise-wide Demand Unscored Unscored Yes
33) Replacement Market assessment Unscored Unscored Yes
34) Integration of Third Party Storage Unscored Unscored Yes
35) Integration of Lead Times, Constraints and Transportation Costs (Jobbers) Unscored Unscored Yes
36) Supports Internet Orders and Allocations Unscored Unscored Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2119 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
20/21
1.7.3 Available to Promise (25,0%) (Cont...)
1.7.3.1 AVAILABLE TO PROMISE (ATP) (Cont...)
Multiple Choice Response: Standard (YNCF3)
Adexa i2 SAP
37) Lost Opportunity Cost Tracking, including: Unscored Unscored Yes
38) lost market share Unscored Unscored Yes
39) lost revenue Unscored Unscored Yes
40) customer service productivity Unscored Unscored Yes
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2120 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View
8/3/2019 i2_Adexa_SAPcomparison
21/21
MCQ Key Descriptions - Explanation of Multiple Choice Questions Keys
Standard (YNCF3)
Y Yes
F Future
C Custom
3 Third Party
U Unscored
N No
No Response
11-Mrz-2002Alternative Data Report
2121 ofPage Copyright 2001 Gartner, Inc.Model:
Scenario:
Supply Chain Management
Gartner View