INTL. ECAR’S SYMPOSIUM EXPECTATIONS FROM AIRLINE TRAINING DEPARTMENTS Herbert Kavka Deputy Director / Senior Instructor JAR-147 Maintenance Training Organisation October 23 rd , 2003
Jan 05, 2016
INTL. ECAR’S SYMPOSIUM
EXPECTATIONS FROM
AIRLINE TRAINING DEPARTMENTS
Herbert KavkaDeputy Director / Senior Instructor
JAR-147 Maintenance Training Organisation
October 23rd, 2003
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 2
INTRODUCTION
AIRCRAFT BASIC TRAINING TECHNICIAN – MECHANICAL TB1.1 TECHNICIAN – AVIONIC TB2 MECHANIC TA1
AUSTRIAN AIRLINESJAR-147 MAINTENANCE TRAINING ORGANISATION
AIRCRAFT TYPE TRAINING TECHNICIAN MECHANIC T1 TECHNICIAN AVIONIC T2 MECHANIC T3 BASE ENGINEER T4
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 3
EXISTING PROBLEMS
BASIC PREQUALIFICATIONS
TYPE TRAINING / PRACTICAL TRAINING
BASIC EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 4
BASIC PREQUALIFICATIONS
Analyses of related national apprenticeships
Apprenticeship recognition by all JAA Member States
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 5
Momentarily status given by Authorities demonstrated by an actual example:
Austrian wanted to buy B767 Cat B2 type training (knowledge and practical)
Austrian intended to buy the JAR-147 approved Practical Part from another Training Organisation
BUT
TYPE TRAINING/PRACTICAL TRAINING
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 6
For JAR-147 Training Organisations
it is not allowed to issue a JAR-147
certificate for practical training only
TYPE TRAINING/PRACTICAL TRAINING
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 7
Momentarily status given by Authorities:
A...Knowledge Part
B...Practical Part
C...Whole Course (Knowledge- and Practical Part)
TYPE TRAINING/PRACTICAL TRAINING
A + B = C trueC - B = A true
butC - A = B false ???
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 8
So now what to do ???
TYPE TRAINING/PRACTICAL TRAINING
Definition of “Minimum Mandatory Tasks” for Practical Training
The “Master Parameter” should not be the duration but the content
Standardization of all Practical Training under JAR/ECAR (PART)-147 criteria
Avoidance of the need of two separate responsible organisations (147-MTO and 145-MO)
“Case by case” review by authority after approved training is not necessary
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 9
The goal should be:
TYPE TRAINING/PRACTICAL TRAINING
After satisfactorily completion of such an approved “complete” training course (even performed in different training organisations) the issue of an Aircraft Maintenance License should be no problem
The 145-MO should “work in front” and the 147-MTO should “train” primarily
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 10
BASIC EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Publication of the official Questionnaire by the Authority
Prequalification Matrix published by the Authority
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 11
CONCLUSION
The goal is excellent competence of the student guaranteed by an Approved Training Organisation independent of their location and nationality.
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 12
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
H. Kavka October 23rd, 2003
Page 13
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION