Top Banner
24

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

Apr 17, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...
Page 2: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 2

Sustained recovery in H1FY22 : Outlook Positive

❖ India Inc seems to have overcome the “pandemic” with a sustained recovery as reflected in Credit Ratio* of 2.05 in H1FY22.

❖ The Credit ratio has seen a sequential improvement from 1.27 in H2FY21 after seeing a downward trajectory in the earlier three half years.

❖ In H1FY22, CARE Ratings upgraded ratings on 301 entities and downgraded ratings of 147 entities.

❖ Inspite of the recent second wave of pandemic, the economy seems to have embarked on the recovery path with most sectors recording improved

performance. The uptick can also be seen with the core sector output growing by 11.6% in August 2021.

❖ The sectors which recorded the most improvements are construction, roads and power generation within infrastructure sector and pharmaceuticals,

chemicals, steel and textile entities in the industrial sector.

❖ CARE’s Modified Credit Ratio (MCR)^ also improved from 0.92 in H1FY21 to 1.11 in H1 FY22.

❖ The uptrend in the credit quality can be attributed to the increase in demand (including pent up), incentives by the government like Atmanirbhar

Bharat , government spending on infrastructure, benign interest rates, global pick up in demand and impact of China + 1 strategy.

❖ The credit outlook is expected to be positive..

❖ Third wave of pandemic (if it assumes large proportions) to be a key monitorable and would be a risk to the credit outlook

*ratio of upgrades to downgrades ^ratio of (upgrades and reaffirmations) to (downgrades and reaffirmations)

Page 3: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

Credit Ratio & MCR

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 3

Page 4: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 4

Both the Credit Ratio & Debt weighted Credit Ratio – Depict Sustained Recovery

Credit Ratio (CR) = Upgrades / Downgrades

• CR higher than unity denotes higher upgrades than downgrades and an increase from an earlier period denotes higher proportion of upgrades

than downgrades. Decline in the same signals a deterioration in credit quality of the rated entities.

• Growth attributed mainly to upgrades in Roads, Construction, Power generation, Chemicals, Steel and Pharmaceutical sectors

• Downgrades seen in NBFCs, Hospitality and Retail

1.27

1.73

1.18

2.29

1.22

1.48

0.81 0.64

0.49

1.27

2.05

0.49

0.83 0.88

2.14

1.03

0.47 0.12 0.10 0.18

1.31

2.08

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

H1FY17 H2FY17 H1FY18 H2FY18 H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

Credit Ratio Debt weighted credit ratio

Page 5: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 5

Half yearly MCR : Sustaining above 1 since H2FY21

• Modified Credit Ratio (MCR) = (Upgrades and Reaffirmations) / (Downgrades and Reaffirmations)

• An MCR closer to one indicates higher stability in the ratings, with a larger proportion of reaffirmations.

• Majority of the entities (73%) saw their credit ratings being reaffirmed in H1 FY22

1.04 1.07

1.03

1.13

1.03 1.05

0.97 0.95 0.92

1.03

1.11

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY17 H2FY17 H1FY18 H2FY18 H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

Half yearly MCR Trajectory

Page 6: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 6

Proportion of upgrades, downgrades & reaffirmations : High Reaffirmations denoting stability

12 9

14 8

12 10

16 12

15

9 9

72 76

71 73 73

76 71

80 77

80

73

16 15 16 19

15 14 13 8 7

11

18

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

H1FY17 H2FY17 H1FY18 H2FY18 H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

%

Downgrades Reaffirmations Upgrades

• Proportion of upgrades increased from 7% in H1 FY21 to 18% in H1 FY22

Page 7: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 7

Investment Grade (IG) cases have exhibited a stronger revival in Credit Quality

1.17 1.20

1.13 1.17

1.08 1.08

0.97 0.98 0.93

1.07

1.16

0.88

0.99 0.92

1.07

0.97 1.02

0.96 0.92 0.90

0.96 1.03

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY17 H2FY17 H1FY18 H2FY18 H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

MCR - IG/BIG

Investment Grade Below Investment Grade

Page 8: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

Sector MCRs

Page 9: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 9

• The Banking Sector has largely witnessed retention of ratingswith some upgrades due to improved capitalisation levelsand lower than expected asset quality issues.

• MCR for NBFC sector is also improving, however remainsbelow unity. The sector saw downgrades in this half yearmainly due to :✓ Deterioration in profitability due to higher credit costs✓ Erosion of capital buffers✓ Restricted physical movement of collection staff in the

second wave of pandemic leading to weak collections✓ Deterioration in financial and liquidity profile of the

parent company

BFSI : Slow and Steady improvement - MCR marginally below unity

1.05 1.04 0.83

0.97 0.92 0.95 0.99

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

BFSI

0.85

0.96

0.96 0.91 0.92 0.95

1.06 1.07 1.05

0.82 0.98

0.92 0.95

0.98

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

MCR for banks & NBFCs

Banks NBFCs

Page 10: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 10

• MCR for Infrastructure entities improved to above unity from second half of the last fiscal hinting at recovery in the

economy.

• The upgrades in this segment are driven mainly by construction, roads and power generation sectors.

• Improvement in entities in the power sector was mainly seen in the renewables space with better liquidity, track record of

operations and receipt of earlier stuck dues from customers.

Infrastructure : MCR Galloping ahead

0.99 1.01 0.97 0.94 0.91

1.10 1.17

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

Page 11: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 11

• Construction sector : This sector witnessed significant pain inH1FY21 with the pandemic bringing in execution challenges dueto migration of labour.

• MCR improved in H1 FY22 due to:

✓ Pace of execution picking up due to the unlock process✓ Revenue visibility enhanced with infrastructure push by the

Government spending✓ Improvement in profitability

MCR for construction & roads swinging up

1.02 1.03 0.95 0.90 0.93

1.06 1.12

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Construction MCR

0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96

0.79

0.99

1.23

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Roads MCR• Roads : This sector also witnessed a very low MCR of 0.79 in H1

FY21 which significantly changed to 1.23 in H1 FY22

• Upgrades were triggered by:✓ Better toll collections post achievement of commercial

operations as also due to implementation of FASTag,✓ Increase in pace of roads construction activity, completion

of four laning of NH-3 and shift in mode of transport frombuses to cars

✓ Change in ownership with strong sponsors taking control✓ Debt reduction with transfer of certain assets to InvITs✓ Establishment of track record of annuity receipts

Page 12: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 12

• Power Transmission and Distribution : This sector has witnesseda range bound MCR in the past few years.

• MCR marginally improved in H1 FY22 due to stabilisation postachievement of commercial operations.

MCR for power stays strong

• Power generation : MCR dipped slightly in H1 FY22, continued toremain above 1.

• Upgrades triggered by:

✓ Settlement of overdue receivables after disbursement byPFC/REC funds

✓ Improved liquidity on receipt of funds under AtmanirbharBharat scheme reducing borrowing

✓ Better availability of cheaper coal✓ Improved operational performance/track record of

operations

0.87 0.97 1.00

0.93 0.94 0.88

1.07

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Power - Transmission and distribution MCR

1.07 1.12 1.05

0.99 0.96

1.23 1.11

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Power Generation MCR

Page 13: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 13

• MCR for Industrial / Services sector has also witnessed an up-tick from H2FY21, with the trend continuing in H1 FY22.

• Industries that witnessed upgrades were pharmaceuticals, chemicals, steel and textiles.

• Industries like hospitality and retail are yet to recover with low MCR

Industrial / Services : Uptrend in H1FY22

1.04 1.06 0.98 0.96 0.92

1.02 1.12

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1FY20 H2FY20 H1FY21 H2FY21 H1FY22

Industrial/Services MCR

Page 14: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 14

• Chemicals : MCR inched above unity in H2 FY21 and the uptrendcontinued in H1 FY22.

• Upgrades in the sector triggered by:

✓ Increased demand for Indian suppliers substituting Chineseplayers

✓ Improved realisations supported by increased globaldemand and pent up domestic demand

✓ Increase in demand from pharmaceutical industry

MCR for chemicals and pharmaceuticals : Consistent performers

• Pharmaceuticals : This has been the most resilient sector withCovid 19 creating high demand. MCR has been above 1 sinceFY21.

• Upgrades triggered by:

✓ The pandemic and consequent increase in importance ofhealthcare

✓ Increased scale of operations, profitability and revenuevisibility

✓ Companies playing a role in vaccine development

1.02 1.14

1.00 0.97 0.88

1.12 1.19

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Chemicals MCR

0.89 1.01

0.87 0.98

1.08

1.33 1.41

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Pharmaceuticals MCR

Page 15: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 15

• Iron and steel• Higher upgrades witnessed due to:

✓ Sizable deleveraging due to strong operating performance

✓ Jump in realizations by nearly 80% in flat steel and 50% in longsteel since June 2020 in line with the trend in global steel prices

✓ Expectations of elevated domestic prices

✓ Sales volumes expected to pick up on the back of strongdemand from infrastructure

MCR for Iron & steel and Textiles : improved significantly

• Textiles

• Upgrades in the sector were for the following reasons:

✓ The industry witnessed strong demand post the pandemic, fromdomestic and export market

✓ Indian exporters derived benefit from China+1 strategy✓ Spinners saw significant improvement in yarn prices relative to

cotton.

1.28 1.34

1.16 1.01

0.92 1.06

1.27

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Iron and Steel MCR

1.08 1.00 1.04

0.96 0.90

1.00 1.08

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Textiles MCR

Page 16: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 16

• Auto• Higher upgrades witnessed due to:

✓ Upcycle in the CV segment with uptick in the end-user industries

✓ PV segment also showing improvement due to pent up demand

✓ Ancillaries supplying to the OEMs benefitting correspondinglydue to growth in order book from the OEMs

MCR for auto and cement : Sudden Spurt

1.16 1.13 1.06

0.89 0.83

0.96

1.21

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Auto MCR

1.08 1.10 1.11 1.00 1.09 1.08

2.00

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Cement MCR • Cement was one of the least affected sectors by the pandemic

• Upgrades were triggered by:

✓ Improvement in turnover and profitability with higher demandfrom infrastructure and other end-user industries

✓ Collections and liquidity improved with better performance ofthe end-user industries

Page 17: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 17

• Hospitality : Worst hit sector due to the pandemic.

• Downgrades in the sector in H1 FY22 mainly triggered by:

✓ Tourism activity yet to pick up, though unlock process hasstarted

✓ Business travel also restricted due to Covid

MCR for hospitality and retail : Pandemic Casualties

• Trading entities

• Upgrades were mainly in the wholesale trading industry while theretail trading entities witnessed downgrades.

• Downgrades in the retail sector were mainly driven by:

✓ Covid related stress still not over for the sector✓ Stretched liquidity with funds stuck in working capital

0.86

1.10 1.07 1.02

0.88 0.89

0.69

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Hospitality MCR

1.04 1.10 1.06

0.89 0.85 0.98 1.03

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Wholesale and retail trade MCR

Page 18: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 18

MCR for other industries

Sector H1FY19 H2FY19 H1 FY20 H2 FY20 H1 FY21 H2 FY21 H1 FY22

Coal Mining 1.00 1.00 1.50 0.80 1.00 1.25 1.50

Telecom 0.91 1.05 0.60 0.77 0.85 0.89 1.11

Beverages 1.25 1.23 1.75 0.96 0.95 1.15 1.13

Ceramics 1.05 1.19 1.10 0.95 0.76 1.04 2.00

Education 0.91 0.98 0.89 1.12 1.11 0.93 1.03

Gems & Jewellery 1.07 1.00 0.57 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00

Real Estate 0.91 0.95 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.89 1.03

Sugar 1.00 0.94 1.13 0.89 1.50 1.00 1.45

• MCR for most industries shows an upward trend

Page 19: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

Economy

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 19

Page 20: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 20

• India's economic recovery continued in August, albeit at a moderate pace compared with the impressive expansion in July

• A score in the range of 6-8 indicates steady state position. The score of 6.25 in August is encouraging, suggesting that economy is showing initial signs of stability.

CARE Ratings Economic Meter

1.50

3.20

4.60

5.35

4.35

6.85

6.10 6.10 6.35 6.40

5.45

6.405.85

3.15

4.10

8.25

6.75

April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Care Ratings' Economic Meter

FY21 FY22

Page 21: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 21

• Manufacturing activity and electricity output witnessing month-on-month growth since June • GST collections on the rise – over Rs. 1 lakh crore since Jul’21 • Robust exports and imports growth – Exports growth at 68% and Imports growth at 82% during Apr-Aug’21 (y-o-y)• Bank credit growth has been subdued – incremental credit growth during April-10 Sept’21 is (-)0.3%

Steady improvement in manufacturing, foreign trade and GST collections

-16.6-10.6-7.1

1.0 4.5-1.6 2.2 -0.6 -3.2

24.2

134.6

28.6

13.6 11.5

-12.4-7.6 -6.90.6 -0.6 -1.2 0.4 1.3 -3.3

12.5

62.6

16.39.3 9.4 11.5

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

JUN

-20

JUL

-20

AU

G-2

0

SE

P-2

0

OC

T-2

0

NO

V-2

0

DE

C-2

0

JAN

-21

FE

B-2

1

MA

R-2

1

AP

R-2

1

MA

Y-2

1

JUN

-21

JUL

-21

AU

G-2

1

%

IIP Core sector

46

53.7

34.2

45.4

56.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

JUL

-20

AU

G-2

0

SE

P-2

0

OC

T-2

0

NO

V-2

0

DE

C-2

0

JAN

-21

FE

B-2

1

MA

R-2

1

AP

R-2

1

MA

Y-2

1

JUN

-21

JUL

-21

AU

G-2

1

SE

P-2

1

PMI-Mfg PMI -Services

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

Ap

r-2

0

May

-20

Jun

-20

Jul-

20

Au

g-2

0

Sep

-20

Oct

-20

No

v-2

0

Dec

-20

Jan

-21

Feb

-21

Mar

-21

Ap

r-2

1

May

-21

Jun

-21

Jul-

21

Au

g-2

1

Sep

-21

Rs.

Lak

h C

rore

GST Collections

Page 22: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio in H1 FY22Page: 22

• GDP growth for FY22 is expected to be 9.1%

• Economic activity is expected to attain and surpass pre-pandemic level from Q3 FY22 onwards

• The downside risk to the projection would primarily be a resurgence in the pandemic and weak demand conditions. A pickup

in consumption during the festive season in Q2 and Q3 would be key to the country’s economic growth prospects for the

financial year

• The main drivers of the economy would be agriculture and industry. Growth in industry estimated at 9.4% in FY22.

• RBI is expected to maintain its focus on growth and continue with its accommodative policy stance. Policy rate to be retained

at 4% in 2021 calendar year

• Investment to get limited boost this year, though FY23 can be different. Given the state of the economy and surplus capacity

in industry on a marginal increase in private investments is expected

• PLI scheme to activate investment though the acceleration would be from FY23

Economic Outlook

Page 23: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

Thank You

Page 24: I Assessment of Credit quality of CARE’s rated portfolio ...

CARE Ratings Limited

Corporate Office: 4th Floor, Godrej Coliseum, Somaiya Hospital Road, Off Eastern Express Highway, Sion (East),

Mumbai - 400 022

Tel. : +91-22-6754 3456 I CIN: L67190MH1993PLC071691

Connect

Disclaimer: This report is prepared by CARE Ratings Limited. CARE Ratings has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and objectivity while developing

this report based on information available in public domain. However, neither the accuracy nor completeness of information contained in this report is

guaranteed. CARE Ratings is not responsible for any errors or omissions in analysis / inferences / views or for results obtained from the use of information

contained in this report and especially states that CARE Ratings has no financial liability whatsoever to the user of this report

Revati Kasture Senior Director [email protected] +91-22-6754 3465

Smita Rajpurkar Director [email protected] +91-22-6837 4416

Kavita Chacko Associate Director [email protected] +91-22-6837 4426

Mradul Mishra Media Relations [email protected] +91-22-6837 4424