I-95 Corridor Coalition Partners in Transportation Progress Transportation Border Working Group Toronto, Canada November 19, 2008 Marygrace Parker Program Coordinator, Freight Mobility, Safety & Security
Dec 21, 2015
I-95 Corridor CoalitionPartners in Transportation
ProgressTransportation Border Working Group
Toronto, Canada
November 19, 2008
Marygrace Parker
Program Coordinator, Freight Mobility, Safety & Security
I-95 Corridor Coalition
• The Coalition:– An alliance of transportation agencies, toll authorities and related
organizations, working together to accelerate improvements in long-distance freight movement and passenger travel.
• The Region:– 40,000 National Highway System Miles– 22,000 miles of Class I rail mileage– 46 major seaports– 103 commercial airports
• The Economy:– $4.5 trillion economy (40% of US GDP)– 5.3 billion tons of freight shipments annually– 21% of nation’s road miles (35% of VMT)
I-95 Corridor Coalition Membership
Transportation AuthoritiesDelaware River & Bay AuthorityDelaware River Jt Toll Bridge Comm.Delaware River Port AuthorityFederal Highway AdministrationFederal Maritime AdministrationFederal Motor Carrier Safety Admin.Federal Railroad AdministrationFederal Transit AdministrationMaine Turnpike AuthorityMaryland Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMetropolitan Transportation AuthorityMTA Bridges & TunnelsNew Jersey TransitNew Jersey Turnpike AuthorityNew York State Thruway AuthorityPennsylvania Turnpike CommissionPort Authority of NY& NJSouth Jersey Transportation Authority
Related OrganizationsAAA Foundation for Traffic SafetyAmerican Assoc. of MVAAmerican Bus AssociationAmerican Public Transp. Assoc.American Trucking Assn’sAmtrak Association of American RailroadsBaltimore Metropolitan CouncilCoalition of NE GovernorsDelaware Valley Reg’l PlanningE-ZPass Interagency GroupHigh Speed Ground Transp. Assoc.Intermodal Assn of NAIBTTAITS AMERICANational Capital Region TPBNational Industrial Transp. LeagueNational Private Truck CouncilNew York Metropolitan Transp CouncilNiagara Int’l Trans Tech CoalitionNorth Jersey Transp. Planning Auth.Seaport Advisory Council (MA) Towing & Recovery Assn of AmericaTRANSCOM
State & Local DOT'sConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaMaineMarylandMassachusettsNew HampshireNew JerseyNew York CityNew YorkNorth CarolinaPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaVermontVirginia
Full Members
Affiliate Members
Associate Members
Related OrganizationsGeorgia Regional Transp Auth.Governors Highway Safety Assn.Greater Bridgeport (CT) Transit Auth.New Brunswick (Canada) DOTNew York State Bridge AuthorityQuebec Ministry of Transport
The Coalition’s Program
Elements of Corridor Programs
• Common issues or concerns• Commitment to examine issues and share
information• Coordination of effort
– Planning, deployment, standards
• Commitment to achieve consensus• Cost/benefit assessment/understanding• Communication
– Real time information
Coalition Projects with Border Implications
• Bottleneck Analysis• Northeast Rail Study• Truck Parking Project• Commercial Vehicle Integration Initiative• Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT)• Probe/INRIX project• Coordinated Incident Management
• Compile list of highway bottlenecks in Corridor from available data sources
– HPMS scan– DOT Personnel interview and/or review– FHWA draft freight bottlenecks study– American Highway Users Alliance (AHUA) freight
bottlenecks study– American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) speed
data– INRIX speed data
Bottlenecks (Trucks) Study
Bottlenecks Study
• Identified:– All significant
truck freight bottlenecks
• Noted:– Delay estimate
tool does not capture delay at toll booths or border crossings
Bottlenecks Study • Adding speed data captures toll booth and border
crossing delay• 2007 annual average speed for northbound trucks:
– I-87 Border Crossing: < 40 mph– I-81 Border Crossing: 40-45 mph
I-87 Border Crossing
I-81 Border Crossing
Northeast Rail Operations Studies(NEROps) Phase 1* and 2
• A neutral forum to identify and address regional rail issues and choke points
• Lay groundwork for the development of a regional rail improvement program in the Northeast (ME, NH, VT, MA, CT, RI and NY)
• Phase 1 Completed
Key Northeast Rail Issues
Institutional
• Multi-jurisdictional programming and implementation of rail projects
• Railcar availability
• Balancing security and efficiency
– Siding delays
• Future of Amtrak and the Northeast Corridor
• Commuter rail expansion and implementation of high-speed rail in the region
• Alternative approaches for serving East-of-Hudson markets
Key Northeast Rail Issues
Infrastructure and Operations
• Few local bottlenecks; instead, problems are systemic and region wide:– System capacity
– Track clearance, structure and alignment
– Yards
– Railcar availability
– Bridges, tunnels and viaducts
Key Northeast Rail Issues
Chokepoints
Northeast Region Border Crossings
• Need to balance security and operational efficiency
• Rail border crossings in ME, VT, and NY handle >20 percent of US-Canada rail freight traffic
Case Study: Rouses Point Rail Border Crossing
• Inbound freight trains must stop on a single track line to be screened by US Customs and Border Protection using VACIS
• Lack of sidings, several grade crossings contribute to system-wide delays at this one bottleneck
Major NEROps Region Rail Corridors
NEC
Atlantic Canada
Southern Tier
Empire
Northwoods
Connecticut River
Adirondack
Patriot Corridor
NEC
Atlantic Canada
Southern Tier
Empire
Northwoods
Connecticut River
Adirondack
Patriot Corridor
Crescent
NEROps Phase II
• Objective – Define strategic rail corridors (e.g., Patriot,
NEC, NE/Crescent, etc.) to position the region for authorization
• Clarify economic development and Canadian trade (security) goals
• Coordinate passenger and freight rail service plans
• Optimize Class I and short line railroads as a network
• Develop business case for streamlining state rail regulatory approaches
• Advance multi-state investment strategies
I-95 Coalition Truck Parking Project
• USDOT/FHWA awarded project to develop and implement real-time information system for trucking industry across boundaries in Corridor– Assess available parking spaces in selected public/private facilities– Provide real-time transmission of space availability to trucker in-
vehicle – Potential for future reservation-based systems
• Work with agencies and private sector, in particular distribution and warehousing industry, to assess potential to remediate capacity issues
*
Commercial Vehicle Integration Initiative Program (CVII)
Build on Vehicle Integration Initiative by bringing commercial vehicles into the equation:
• Develop/Test CV VII compliant OBE system including Human Vehicle Interface
• Develop/Test VII DSRC CV Driver I.D and Verification (TWIC, Biometrics) Test Wireless Vehicle Safety Inspection Information (brake condition, tire pressure, light status, etc.)CV to Maintenance Vehicles communicationRoadside to CV work zone/accident warning
Concept of VII W/CVII!
OBEDSRC @ 5.9 GHZ
RSE
Network Management Center
Public Sector
OBE – On Board Equipment
RSE – Road Side Equipment
Green = NYSRed = Others/TBD
OBE
OEMs, Private Companies,
Subscription Services, etc.
Private Sector
VII Can Enable a Wide Range of Applications!
• Safety & Security Examples– Lane/Road Departure
– Road Condition Warning
– Cargo/Container Tracking
– Vehicle Safety Data/Wireless Inspection
– CV Driver ID/Verification
– CV Routing/Geo Fencing
– In-vehicle/signing
– Intersection collision avoidance
– Parking availability
– Overturn warning/control
• Mobility Examples– Traffic Probe Data– Travel Time– Tolling– Incident/Accident Info.– Electronic Payment– Navigation/Directions
CVII Program Requirements
• Complete interoperability! • Communicate with any VII compliant vehicle or
infrastructure• Non-proprietary system design capable of duplication!• USDOT’s National VII Initiative utilizing DSRC 802.11p • Integrate VII communications device w/SAE J1708
commercial vehicle data bus• Compliant/utilizing the standard message sets SAE
J1587, SAE J1939 and SAE 2735
Corridor Analysis – Need:Many maps, but no Corridor-scale transportation planning networks
Complete map coverage Incomplete network coverage
Integrated CorridorAnalysis Tool (ICAT)
• Analysis and planning tool to support multi-state transportation planning, investment, and operations planning by linking, across region:– GIS-based transportation network data– linear referencing system data– basic roadway data
• Providing a source for multi-state transportation planning– Fill gap between metropolitan and state network
models and Nat’l Highway Planning Network
ICAT Applications
• Evacuation/emergency planning• Corridor bottleneck analysis
• Freight planning
• Historic travel time information (by TOD) for traveler information/511 systems
Vehicle Probe Project – Applications
• Regional Incident Management• Travel Information Websites• Travel Times on VMS• Agency 511 systems• Corridor Performance Measures
Vehicle Probe Project
• Content– Real-time Speed, Travel Time, Confidence level– Average Speed, Free Flow Speed– Travel Time Updates Every Two Minutes
• Monitoring Site– Agency Access Only – View data in real-time
Vehicle Probe Project
• 1500 Freeway miles• 1000 Arterial miles• New Jersey to
North Carolina for
initial deployment
Coalition/Border Program Opportunities
• Bottleneck analysis, ICAT, Probe– Can be used to detect, project future demand,
analyze, provide real time information exchange on border crossing transit
• Commercial Vehicle Programs– CVII can be utilized as platform for integration of
border activities including security applications
• Rail, Highway Bottleneck studies– Identify projects for resolution of regionally
significant physical (and operational/institutional) chokepoints
– Define and aggregate major transportation investment needs and benefits
Coalition/Border Program Opportunities
• Coordinated Operations/Incident Management– Deployment of ITS technologies to support Operations
system• Sharing of information, real-time travel conditions
• Major incident/special event planning
• Quick Clearance Programs
• Multi-Agency Institutional Analysis– Examine institutional models for multi-agency/state
investment
• Financing Improvements– Examine finance models for mega-projects
Reauthorization• Facilitate multi-state partnerships / coalitions to
improve transportation system performance and reliability– Reduce user / environmental costs of long
distance travel by supporting activities, systems and projects that achieve national goals:
• Clearing incidents quickly• Informing public about significant
incidents/events• Conducting orderly evacuations during
emergencies• Implementing interoperable technology, safety
& scurrility systems• Improving operations of pass/freight systems
and intermodal connectors
Reauthorization (cont’d)
• Fund large-scale improvements along nationally significant corridors where cost/benefits accrue beyond state boundaries– Funding is critical to efficient interstate commerce
and international trade– An appropriate role for federal government
• Avoid the “cost of failure”