I-10 MASTER PLAN MIDDLE SECTION
Apr 01, 2015
I-10 MASTER PLAN
MIDDLE SECTION
AGENDA
• Study Area Limits• Master Plan Process/Project Schedule• Quick Review of Current and Future
Conditions• Tier I Evaluation Results• Tier II Alternatives Analysis/Results• Opportunities for Public Involvement• Next Steps• Project Contacts
STUDY AREA LIMITS
Begin ProjectSanta Rosa/Okaloosa County Line
End ProjectJackson/Gadsden County Line
MASTER PLAN EVALUATION PROCESS
• Based on goals and objectives from the 2060 FTP
• Criteria and measures of effectiveness were developed using previous studies, partner and public involvement, and the project team
PROGRESSION FOR INTERSTATE ENHANCEMENTS
Corridor Transportation Alternatives
Sketch Interstate Plan
Corridor Master/Action Plan
Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Design
Right of Way
Construction
~2 years
~2 years
~2 years
~2 years
Estimated DurationWe are
here
PROJECT SCHEDULEWe are here
CURRENT CONDITIONS
• Roadway design meet standards • Existing travel demand (2012) – All mainline segments, merge/diverge
segments, and unsignalized intersections meet LOS standards
– Exit 56, SR 85 signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards
• Safety review • Community and Environment review
FUTURE TRAVEL DEMAND - 2025
• Mainline and merge/diverge segments meet LOS standards
• Four unsignalized intersections do not meet LOS standards – Exit 70, SR 285– Exit 85, US 331 (DeFuniak Springs)– Exit 136, SR 276 (Family Dollar Distribution
Center)– Exit 142, SR 71 (Marianna)
• Exit 56, SR 85 (Crestview) signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards
FUTURE TRAVEL DEMAND - 2040
• Mainline and merge/diverge segments meet LOS standards
• Nine unsignalized intersections do not meet LOS standards – Exit 45, CR 189 – Exit 70, SR 285– Exit 85, US 331
(DeFuniak Springs)– Exit 96, SR 81 – Exit 112, SR 79
(Bonifay)
• Exit 56, SR 85 (Crestview) signalized intersection does not meet LOS standards
– Exit 120, SR 77 (Chipley)– Exit 130, US 231– Exit 136, SR 276 (Family
Dollar Distribution Center)– Exit 142, SR 71 (Marianna)
CONCEPTUAL MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT ALTERNATIVES
• Tier I Evaluation Results• Tier II Alternatives Analysis• Tier II Evaluation Results
TIER I EVALUATION RESULTS
Economic Competitiveness Community Livability Environmental Stewardship Safety &
SecurityMaintenance & Operations
Mobility & Connectivity
CMEA # and Description
Cost of Implementation
Eligibility for additional funding
Highways of Commerce
Foster freight movement
Land use plan consistency
Long range plan consistency
Avoid wetland impacts
Avoid prime farmland impacts
Avoid wildlife habitat
Minimize noise impacts
Minimize air quality impacts
Improve safety of corridor
Support hurricane evacuation
Limit right of way impacts
Limit utility impacts
Provide acceptable capacity
Promotes transit
Total MOE
Recommended for Tier II
1 No build 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 33 2 Minor improvements 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 41 3 ITS expansion 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 43 4 Collector-Distributor road 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 26 5 Frontage roads1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 25 6 Separate HOV lanes1, , 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 34 7 Managed Lanes1, 2, 3, 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 34 8 System to System express lanes1, 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 28 9 Reversible lanes2, 3, 4 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 32 10 New general use lanes1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 1 36 11 Localized express lanes1, 3, 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 29 12 Fixed guide way transit1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 30 13 Dedicated truck lane1, 2, 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 32 14 New interchange (Crestview) 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 3 1 33 15 Multimodal strategies 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 3 44
[1] Assumes new lanes[2] Assumes use of median[3] Assumes tolls[4] Assumes no trucks
TIER I EVALUATION RESULTS
• No build• Minor improvements (including interchange
improvements)• Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
expansion• Separated HOV lanes• Managed lanes• New general use lanes• New interchange• Multimodal strategies
TIER II EVALUATION MATRIXGoal Areas Objectives Criteria Measures
EconomicCompetitiveness
Develop cost effective strategies to maximize economic competitiveness.
Cost of Implementation
Minimize operations and maintenance (O&M) costs
Determine range for planning level cost estimates
Determine relative cost for facility O&M costs (highway, HOV, transit, etc.)
CommunityLivability
Promote compatibility with surrounding community development to support and enhance livable communities.
Promote community cohesion by reducing relocation impacts
Avoid socio-cultural impacts
Extent of relocation impacts and estimated costs
Extent of socio-cultural impacts
EnvironmentalStewardship
Promote the development of alternatives that promote responsible environmental stewardship and limit environmental impacts.
Avoid wetland impacts Avoid impacts to endangered
species Avoid noise impacts Enhance or conform with air
quality
Extent of impacts to wetlands Extent of impact to endangered species
Extent of noise impacts Extent of air quality impacts
Safety and Security
Promote the development of alternatives to provide a safe and secure transportation system for all users.
Reduce potential crashes Improve incident and traffic
management
Extent of roadway safety improvement Extent of reduction in delay
Maintenance and Operations
Consideration of design regulations and standards to minimize impacts and promote proactive maintenance and operations.
Avoid drainage impacts Freight design considerations
Extent of impact to drainage facilities Extent of enhanced design to accommodate
freight movements
Mobility and connectivity
Promote the enhancement of mobility and connectivity for the movement of people and freight.
Promote transit
Facilitate freight movement
Extent of transit level of service or ridership improvement
Extent of improvement for service and access provided by trucks
TIER II EVALUATION RESULTS
Economic
CompetitivenessCommunityLivability
Environmental Stewardship
Safety & Security
Maintenance & Operations
Mobility and Connectivity
Cost of Implementation
Minimize O&M costs
Promote community cohesion
Avoid socio-cultural impacts
Avoid wetland impacts
Avoid impacts to endangered species
Avoid noise impacts
Enhance or conform with air quality
Reduce potential crashes
Improve incident and traffic management
Avoid drainage impacts
Freight design considerations
Promote transit
Facilitate freight movements
Total MOE
Recommended for PMEA
1 No-build 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 48 2 Minor improvements 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 2 3 49 3 ITS expansion 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 3 2 3 53 6 Separate HOV lanes1, 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 4 2 5 2 44 7 Managed lanes1, 2, 3, 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 5 4 1 3 2 42 10 New general use lanes1 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 5 1 5 43 14 New interchange (Antioch Road) 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 2 5 45 15 Multimodal strategies 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 5 1 5 1 50
[1] Assumes new lanes[2] Assumes use of median[3] Assumes tolls[4] Assumes no trucks
TIER II EVALUATION RESULTS
• No build• Minor improvements (including
interchange improvements)• Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
expansion• New interchange• Multimodal strategies
MINOR IMPROVEMENTS – RECOMMENDED INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS BY 2025
Exit 56, SR 85Exit 136, SR 276Exit 142, SR 71
MINOR IMPROVEMENTS – RECOMMENDED INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS BY 2040
Exit 45, CR 189Exit 56, SR 85Exit 70, SR 285Exit 85, US 331Exit 96, SR 81Exit 158, CR 286
CONCEPTUAL LOCATION OF NEW INTERCHANGE I-10 @ ANTIOCH ROAD
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
• Tier II Alternatives public meeting– Okaloosa, Walton Counties• Thursday, July 31, 2014, 5:30 p.m. to 6:30
p.m. CST Crestview Community Center 1446 Commerce Drive, Crestview
–Washington, Holmes, and Jackson Counties• Thursday, August 7, 2014, 5:30 p.m. to 6:30
p.m. CST First Baptist Church, 1300 South Blvd, Chipley
• Project handouts/Comment sheet
NEXT STEPS
• Tier II Public Meetings• Preferred Mobility Enhancement
Alternatives (PMEAs) sent to FDOT• Draft Master Plan report submitted to
FDOT• Final Master Plan report distributed to
counties for consideration into LRTP and Work Program priorities
PROJECT CONTACTS
Virgie Bowen – FDOT Project ManagerFlorida Department of TransportationDistrict 3 Planning Office1074 Hwy 90, Chipley, FL 32428850-330-1530 email: [email protected]
Ian Satter – District Public Information DirectorFlorida Department of Transportation1074 Hwy 90, Chipley, FL 32428850-330-1205 email: [email protected]
Sarah Walker – Consultant Project ManagerHNTB850-878-9777email: [email protected]