Page 1
NULL HYPOTHESIS◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine = NSS= Acetylcholine + Atropine = Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine ≠ NSS ≠ Acetylcholine + Atropine≠ Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
1
Page 2
Reject Null, Accept Alternative Hypothesis◦ Effect on intestinal motility
Acetylcholine ≠ NSS ≠ Acetylcholine + Atropine≠ Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
Ach > NSS > Ach-Epinephrine > Ach-Atropine
2
Page 3
Acetylcholine + Atropine
Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
Acetylcholine NSS
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
A 30 37 43 50 49 -- 45 --
B 39 63 72 52 62 36 51 87
C 74 34 26 42 39 35 6 --
D 74 78 53 52 72 72 47 46
* % DISTANCE TRAVELLED BY INDIA INK
3
Page 4
Anova: Single Factor (casualties included)
SUMMARYGroups Count Sum Average Variance
Ach+Atro 8 432.45 54.05625 430.0485Ach+Epi 8 390.07 48.75875 166.36Ach 8 365.45 45.68125 569.5229NSS 8 282.22 35.2775 945.6903
ANOVASource of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 1500.597 3 500.1991 0.947517 0.43103 2.946685Within Groups 14781.35 28 527.9054
Total 16281.95 31
4
F< F crit: Not statistically significant
Page 5
SUMMARY (casualties not included)
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Ach+Atro 8 432.45 54.05625 430.0485
Ach+Epi 8 390.07 48.75875 166.36
Ach 7 365.45 52.20714 266.9622
NSS 6 282.22 47.03667 660.2321
5
Page 6
6
Mean
% d
ista
nce
tra
velle
d b
y in
dia
in
k
Graph 1. Batch Mean of % distance travelled by the India ink in the 4 treatment groups
Page 7
Source of
Variation
SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups
216.6829 3 72.22764 0.198913 0.89613 2.991241
Within Groups
9077.793 25 363.1117
Total 9294.476 28
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (casualties not included)
*Significance level of 5%
INTERPRETATION: If F < Fcrit, Accept Null Hypothesis
7
Page 8
F: 0.198913 F crit: 2.991241
◦ Since (F) < (Fcrit) at α= 0.05 We fail to Reject Null Hypothesis Accept Null Hypothesis Effect on GI Motility:
Acetylcholine = NSS= Acetylcholine + Atropine= Acetylcholine + Epinephrine
8