Top Banner

of 32

Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

May 30, 2018

Download

Documents

Paul H Artes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    1/32

    Beyond the letter chart:New clinical applications of

    Hyperacuity

    Paul H Artes,

    Dalhousie University

    2008

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    2/32

    How can psychophysics catch up

    with advances in imaging?

    sections through a healthy fovea, Spectralis OCT

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    3/32

    How can psychophysics catch up

    with advances in imaging?

    sdOCT: axial resolution: 5 microns

    transverse resolution: 15 microns

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    4/32

    How can psychophysics catch up

    with advances in imaging?

    Hyperacuity psychophysics:

    0.16 microns

    sdOCT: axial resolution: 5 microns

    transverse resolution: 15 microns

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    5/32

    How can psychophysics catch up

    with advances in imaging?

    sdOCT: axial resolution: 5 microns

    transverse resolution: 15 microns

    30 - 100Hyperacuity psychophysics:0.16 microns

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    6/32

    Visual Acuity

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    7/32

    Visual Acuity

    By convention, 6/6 = 1 min or 60 sec

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    8/32

    Visual Acuity

    Physiological limit set

    by receptor spacing, ~30 (6/3)

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    9/32

    4.67 in = 12 degrees

    6/12 letter = 10 min = 1/6 degree

    4.67/72 = 0.065 in

    6/60 letter = 50 min = 5/6 degree

    4.67/14.4 =

    Visual Acuity

    6/12

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    10/32

    4.67 in = 12 degrees

    6/12 letter = 10 min = 1/6 degree

    4.67/72 = 0.065 in

    6/60 letter = 50 min = 5/6 degree

    4.67/14.4 =

    Visual Acuity

    6/60 6/12

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    11/32

    Hyperacuities

    Visual tasks with thresholds much smaller

    than foveal receptor spacing. Westheimer, 1981

    30 60

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    12/32

    Hyperacuities

    Visual tasks with thresholds much smaller

    than foveal receptor spacing. Westheimer, 1981

    30 60Hyperacuity:

    as low as 5

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    13/32

    Classic Hyperacuities

    chevronvernier bisection

    5

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    14/32

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    15/32

    robust to blur and loss of contrast

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    16/32

    Radial Deformation Acuity

    VR 98

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    17/32

    Radial Deformation Acuity

    VR 98

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    18/32

    Radial Deformation Acuity

    Mean radius (eg. 0.5 or 1 degree)Amplitude of sinusoidal deformation (in %)

    RDA thresholds as low as 0.3%, or 3seconds of arc,

    >10 times better than best possible

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    19/32

    4th derivative ofGaussian(resistant to optical

    blur)

    Radial Deformation Acuity

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    20/32

    4.67 in = 12 degrees

    6/12 letter = 10 min = 1/6 degree

    4.67/72 = 0.065 in

    6/60 letter = 50 min = 5/6 degree

    4.67/14.4 =

    Radial Deformation Acuity

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    21/32

    4.67 in = 12 degrees

    6/12 letter = 10 min = 1/6 degree

    4.67/72 = 0.065 in

    6/60 letter = 50 min = 5/6 degree

    4.67/14.4 =

    Radial Deformation Acuity

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    22/32

    4.67 in = 12 degrees

    6/12 letter = 10 min = 1/6 degree

    4.67/72 = 0.065 in

    6/60 letter = 50 min = 5/6 degree

    4.67/14.4 =

    Radial Deformation Acuity

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    23/32

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    24/32

    RDA in Macular Disease

    IOVS 2002

    OVS 2003

    Eyes with early AMD but good VA showed

    large RDA deficits.

    No relation with VA and Contrast Sensitivity.

    No age-related decline in RDA.

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    25/32

    A test for foveal distortion?

    Marc Amsler, 1949

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    26/32

    A test for foveal distortion?

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    27/32

    A test for foveal distortion?

    5-alternative forced-choice

    odd-one-out paradigm

    (controls criterion effects)

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    28/32

    Early data: young volunteers*

    -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    -2.97

    proportions

    een

    66666

    5/6

    4/64/6

    2/62/5

    1/4

    log Radial Deformation (%)

    0.1%, or 3.9

    * Nayha Patel, undergraduate final year project, University of Manchester, UK

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    29/32

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    30/32

    Ongoing project: AMD*

    * Nigel Rawlings, Resident in Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie U.

    Hypotheses

    RDA charts correlate closely with early irregularity

    of foveal receptor layers revealed by spectraldomain OCT & autofluorescence imaging.

    High repeatability of RDA may provide more

    powerful signals forearlychange in AMD, a usefulproperty for clinical trials of new therapies andpreventive strategies.

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    31/32

  • 8/14/2019 Hyperacuities (Artes, FF08)

    32/32

    Thank you!