Page 1
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Hydroxytyrosol ameliorates oxidative stress andmitochondrial dysfunction in doxorubicin-inducedcardiotoxicity in rats with breast cancer
Author: Sergio Granados-Principal Nuri El-azem ReinaldPamplona Cesar Ramirez-Tortosa Mario Pulido-Moran LauraVera-Ramirez Jose L. Quiles Pedro Sanchez-Rovira AlbaNaudı Manuel Portero-Otin Patricia Perez-Lopez MCarmenRamirez-Tortosa
PII: S0006-2952(14)00225-1DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2014.04.001Reference: BCP 11949
To appear in: BCP
Received date: 10-3-2014Revised date: 3-4-2014Accepted date: 3-4-2014
Please cite this article as: Granados-Principal S, El-azem N, Ramirez-Tortosa RP,</sup>Cesar, Pulido-Moran M, Vera-Ramirez L, Quiles JL, Sanchez-Rovira P,Naudi A, Portero-Otin M, Perez-Lopez P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Hydroxytyrosolameliorates oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in doxorubicin-inducedcardiotoxicity in rats with breast cancer, Biochemical Pharmacology (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.04.001
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 2
Page 1 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
1
Hydroxytyrosol ameliorates oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in 1
doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats with breast cancer 2
Sergio Granados-Principala,b
, Nuri El-azema,b
, Reinald Pamplonac Cesar Ramirez-3
Tortosad, Mario Pulido-Moran
a,b , Laura Vera-Ramirez
e, Jose L. Quiles
b,f, Pedro 4
Sanchez-Rovirag, Alba Naudí
c, Manuel Portero-Otin
c, Patricia Perez-Lopez
b,f, 5
MCarmen Ramirez-Tortosaa,b*
6
aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Biomedical Research Center, 7
Granada, Spain. b“José Mataix” Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, Biomedical 8
Research Center, Granada, Spain. cDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of 9
Medicine, University of Lleida-IRB, Lleida, Spain. d
Pathological Anatomy Service, 10
Jaen City Hospital, Jaen, Spain. eGENYO Granada, Spain.
fDepartment of Physiology, 11
Biomedical Research Center, Granada, Spain. gOncology Service, Jaen City Hospital, 12
Jaen, Spain.
13
Short title: Hydroxytyrosol in doxorubicin-induced damage. 14
15
*Corresponding author: Dr. MCarmen Ramirez-Tortosa. Instituto de Nutrición y 16
Tecnología de Alimentos “José Mataix Verdú”. Universidad de Granada. Centro de 17
Investigación Biomédica. Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud. Avenida del 18
Conocimiento s/n, 18100-Granada (Granada, Spain). Phone: +34 958241000 Ext. 19
20315 Fax: +34 958819132. E-mail: [email protected] 20
21
22
1Abbreviations 23
1AASA, aminoadipic semialdehyde; ADR, doxorubicin; AIF, Apoptosis-inducing
factor; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CEL, Nε-
*Manuscript
Page 3
Page 2 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
2
Abstract 1
Oxidative stress is involved in several processes including cancer, aging and 2
cardiovascular disease, and has been shown to potentiate the therapeutic effect of drugs 3
such as doxorubicin. Doxorubicin causes significant cardiotoxicity characterized by 4
marked increases in oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Herein, we 5
investigate whether doxorubicin-associated chronic cardiac toxicity can be ameliorated 6
with the antioxidant hydroxytyrosol in rats with breast cancer. Thirty-six rats bearing 7
breast tumors induced chemically were divided into 4 groups: Control, Hydroxytyrosol 8
(0.5mg/kg, 5 days/week), doxorubicin (1mg/kg/week), and doxorubicin plus 9
hydroxytyrosol. Cardiac disturbances at the cellular and mitochondrial level, 10
mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes I-IV and apoptosis-inducing factor, 11
and oxidative stress markers have been analyzed. Hydroxytyrosol improved the cardiac 12
disturbances enhanced by doxorubicin by significantly reducing the percentage of 13
altered mitochondria and oxidative damage. These results suggest that hydroxytyrosol 14
improve the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This study demonstrates that 15
hydroxytyrosol protect rat heart damage provoked by doxorubicin decreasing oxidative 16
damage and mitochondrial alterations. 17
Key words: oxidative stress, apoptosis-inducing factor, electron transport chain, protein 18
damage, chemo toxicity, hydroxytyrosol. 19
20
(carboxyethyl)-lysine; CK, creatinine kinase; CML, Nε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine; DBI,
double bond index; GSA, Glutamic semialdehyde; HT, hydroxytyrosol; i.v.:
intravenous; LDH, lactate d1ehydrogenase; MDAL, N
ε-malondialdehyde-lysine;
METC, mitochondrial electron transport chain; NQO1, NAD(P)H quinine oxido-
reductase-1; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Page 4
Page 3 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
3
1. Introduction 1
Oxidative stress is a significant consequence in cardiac injury associated with 2
doxorubicin (ADR) treatment [1]. Cardiac tissue is extremely susceptible to free radical-3
induced damage because of high aerobic metabolism, lesser amount of antioxidant 4
defenses compared to other tissues [2], and the post-mitotic features of myocytes [3]. 5
Marked hypotension, tachycardia, cardiac dilation ventricular failure, and higher 6
activities of glutamate-oxalacetic transaminase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatinine 7
phosphokinase enzymes are characteristics of ADR-caused cardiomyopathy [4]. At the 8
ultrastructural level, myofibril loss, cytoplasmatic vacuolization, increased number of 9
lysosomes, and mitochondrial dysfunction have all been reported [1,5]. These cytotoxic 10
side effects of ADR have been attributed to several events: selective accumulation in the 11
mitochondrial lipid membrane, redox cycling, and subsequent generation of reactive 12
oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) [1,6]. It has been shown that ADR redox 13
cycling takes place in the mitochondrial electron transport chain (METC) [7], more 14
specifically at complex-I, which, alongside complex-III, are more substantial ROS 15
generators in heart [8]. High mitochondrial ROS production after ADR administration 16
results in molecular oxidative damage that affects membrane-bound proteins and 17
enzymes, lipids, the mitochondrial genome, as well as significant other biomolecules 18
[7,9]. 19
The secoiridoid oleuropein, a phenolic compound found in virgin olive oil, has 20
demonstrated protective effects against ADR toxicity, mainly due to its high antioxidant 21
capacity [1] as other biomolecules [10]. Phenolic alcohol hydroxytyrosol (HT), another 22
bioactive molecule found in olive oil, has highly similar antioxidant properties [11]. HT 23
has other features such as iron chelative, anti-atherogenic, hypolipidemic, anti-24
inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, anti-microbial, and anti-tumor properties as well [11]. 25
Page 5
Page 4 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
4
Moreover, HT is a good hypoglucemic [12] and anti-viral agent [13,14] that has 1
demonstrated protective effects in rat cardiomyocytes in an ischemia-reperfusion model 2
[15]. Our group has recently reported that HT (0.5 mg/kg) is able to suppress breast 3
tumor growth in female Sprague-Dawley rats by modifying the expression of several 4
tumor-related genes [16]. 5
The present study addresses, for the first time, not only the potential protective 6
role of HT against chronic cardiotoxicity generated by ADR in rats with breast cancer, 7
but also the effects of sustained HT on oxidative stress at the cardiac level. To 8
demonstrate this, authors measured cardiac abnormalities at the cellular and 9
mitochondrial level through histopathology and electron microscopy. Total electron 10
flow and the number of ROS-generating-sites into METC can potentially affect the rates 11
of mitochondrial ROS production. Therefore, the content and activity of METC 12
complexes I-IV were also examined. The steady-state levels of five markers of 13
oxidative, glycoxidative, and lipoxidative damage to proteins were measured by gas 14
chromatography/mass spectrometry. Since protein oxidation is secondarily influenced 15
by the membrane´s sensitivity to lipid peroxidation [17], the full fatty acid composition 16
was also measured. 17
18
2. Materials and methods 19
2.1.Animals and reagents 20
Thirty-six female Sprague-Dawley rats (170 ± 20 g), were purchased from 21
Harlan Interfauna Ibérica S.L (Barcelona, Spain) at 7 weeks of age. All animals were 22
housed four per cage in an environmentally-controlled room at 22 ± 2ºC with a 12:12 h 23
(light/dark) cycle. They were given free access to rodent chow and deionized water. All 24
experiments were performed in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki 25
Page 6
Page 5 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
5
Declaration, Spanish animal welfare legislation and Ethical Committee of the 1
University of Granada (CEEA 264-2008) (Spain). Unless otherwise specified, all 2
reagents were from Sigma (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Hydroxytyrosol was purchased 3
from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Doxorubicin was purchased from 4
Pharmacia-Upjohn Laboratories, Bridgewater, NJ, USA. 5
2.2.Experimental protocol 6
Mammary tumors were induced as previously described [16]. Mammary tumor-7
bearing rats were randomized into four groups: 1) Control (n=10): i.v. (intravenous) 8
saline for 6 weeks; 2) HT (n=10): HT (0.5mg/kg, 5 days/week for 6 weeks); 3) ADR 9
(n=8): Doxorubicin (i.v. 1mg/kg/week for 6 weeks) for a total cumulative dose of 10
6mg/kg; and 4) ADR+HT (n=8): combo group treated with the same doses and timing 11
than HT and ADR groups. One week after the last injection, animals were weighed, 12
anaesthetized with intraperitoneally administered ketamine (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, 13
USA), and sacrificed by aortic bleeding. Whole blood was collected and plasma 14
isolated. Hearts were immediately removed and weighed. One half of the heart was snap 15
frozen in liquid nitrogen, while the other half was fixed in 4% buffered formalin 16
(Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA). A small fragment was sectioned for electron 17
microscopy. 18
2.3.Histopathological analysis 19
Formalin-fixed hearts were paraffin-embedded, sectioned (3 µm thickness) and 20
placed onto glass slides. Briefly, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized 21
with Neoclear (Panreac Quimica, Barcelona, Spain), rehydrated with graded alcohol, 22
and stained with Harris’ hematoxylin and eosin (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) in a Leica 23
Autostainer (Wetzlar, Germany). Billingham’s grade [18] was established according to 24
the following criteria: 0.0= no lesions; 0.5= abnormal heart but without typical hurt due 25
Page 7
Page 6 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
6
to ADR-associated toxicity; 1.0= ≤5%, 1.5= 6-15%, 2.0= 16-25%, 2.5= 26-35%, 3.0= 1
>35% of the cells with proper lesions caused by ADR. 2
2.4.Electron microscopy analysis of cardiac mitochondria 3
Cardiac muscle samples were prefixed in 1.5% formaldehyde in 1% cacodylate 4
buffer, pH 7.4 for 2 h at 4 ºC and fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 60 min at 0-4ºC 5
(Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Samples were dehydrated in graded ethanol and 6
embedded in Epon resin and incubated overnight at 65 ºC. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) 7
were cut with a diamond knife using an ultrakut S ultramicrotome and placed on 200-8
mesh copper grids. All sections were stained with uranyl acetate, counterstained with 9
lead citrate, and viewed using a Carl Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) EM10C electron 10
microscope at 40,000X magnification in the Scientific Instrument Service, University of 11
Granada. Negatives were digitally transformed into positive images. Mitochondrial area 12
and percentage of altered mitochondria were assessed. Software Image J [19] was used 13
for the quantification of mitochondrial parameters. 14
2.5.Biochemical parameters in plasma 15
Plasma levels of creatinine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine 16
aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured with 17
enzymatic kits (Spinreact, Girona, Spain). 18
2.6.Immunoblot analysis of METC complexes I-IV and AIF 19
Mitochondrial complexes-I to -IV and AIF were estimated using Western-blot 20
analysis as described previously [20]. Immunodetection was performed using specific 21
antibodies (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Ltd, UK): complex-I (39 kDa-NDUFA9 and 22
30 kDa-NDUFS3 subunits, 1:1000), complex-II (70 kDa-Flavoprotein subunit, 1:500), 23
complex-III (48 kDa-CoreII and 29 kDa-Rieske iron-sulfur-protein subunits, 1:1000), 24
complex-IV (57 kDa-COXI subunit, 1:1000), and AIF polyclonal antibody (1:1000). 25
Page 8
Page 7 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
7
Relative intensity was determined using porin (1:5000, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen 1
Ltd, UK) as control. Appropriate peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies and 2
chemiluminescence HRP (horse radish peroxidase) substrate (Millipore, MA, USA) 3
were used for primary antibody detection. Signal quantification and recording was 4
performed with ChemiDoc BioRad equipment (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Barcelona, 5
Spain). Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method. 6
2.7.Mitochondrial complexes -I and -IV activities 7
Complexes -I and -IV activities were determined using enzyme-activity-8
dipstick-assay kit from MitoSciences (MitoSciences Inc. Oregon, USA). Signal 9
intensities were measured with a dipstick reader (MS-1000 Dipstick Reader, 10
MitoSciences Inc. Oregon, USA). Results were analyzed with the MS-1000 11
measurement software version 1.0.1.2 (MitoSciences Inc. Oregon, USA). 12
2.8.Oxidation-derived protein damage markers by GC/MS 13
Glutamic semialdehyde (GSA), aminoadipic semialdehyde (AASA), Nε-14
(carboxyethyl)-lysine (CEL), Nε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine (CML) and N
ε-15
malondialdehyde-lysine (MDAL) were determined as trifluoroacetic acid-methyl-ester 16
derivatives in acid-hydrolyzed-delipidated and -reduced protein samples by GC/MS, 17
using an isotope-dilution method as previously described [21]. 18
2.9.Fatty acid analysis by GC/MS 19
Fatty acid groups of heart lipids were analyzed as methyl-ester derivatives by 20
GC/MS as previously described [22]. The following fatty acid indices were also 21
calculated: saturated fatty acids (SFA); unsaturated fatty acids (UFA); monounsaturated 22
fatty acids (MUFA); polyunsaturated fatty acids from n-3 and n-6 series (PUFAn-3 and 23
PUFAn-6); average chain length (ACL), double bond index (DBI), and peroxidizability 24
index (PI) (Figure 1) . 25
Page 9
Page 8 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
8
2.10. Statistical analysis 1
Results are shown as mean and SEM. Statistically significant differences 2
(p<0.05) were assessed by ANOVA and Bonferroni pot-hoc test. Histopathological 3
variables and complexes -I and -IV activities were analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis and 4
Mann-Whitney tests. Statistics were conducted with SPSS 15.0 software package for 5
Windows (Chicago, IL, USA). 6
7
3. Results 8
3.1.Assessment of cardiac response by histopathologic, ultrastructural and 9
biochemical analyses 10
Myofibillar loss, dilation of sarcoplasmic reticulum, and swollen mitochondria 11
were described as major morphological changes in human myocardium following ADR 12
treatment. The severity of these changes can be assessed semiquantitatively according to 13
the score by Billingham et al. [18]. In addition, according to Herman and Ferrans [23], 14
the use of smaller-repeated-doses (an individual dose 20% lower than LD50) in animals 15
adequately mimics clinical-chronic-myocardial-alterations in patients. Typical 16
cumulative cardiotoxic doses of ADR cited by these authors are 15mg/kg for rats. In 17
this work, cumulative dose of ADR was 6mg/kg. 18
In this work, ADR induced significant histopathological changes in rat hearts 19
based in the Billingham’s grade (Table 1). However, in accordance with sublethal 20
cumulative doses used in this study, results show that ADR did not cause extensive 21
damage in hearts with clinical manifestations based on either of the following: i) no 22
differences in body weight, heart weight, and heart/body weight ratio among groups 23
(Table 1); ii) a slight vacuolization and inflammatory infiltrate in myocytes (Fig. 2); iii) 24
hearts with a histopathology between abnormal without typical injury due to ADR and 25
Page 10
Page 9 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
9
an effect on less than 5% of the myocytes with proper lesions caused by ADR, and iv) 1
no statistical difference following treatment with ADR, HT and their combination on 2
plasmatic markers of cardiac injury (CK, LDH, ALT and AST) (Table 1). In this 3
scenario, there was not an improvement on heart histopathology after using HT in 4
combination with ADR (Table 1). 5
ADR showed toxicity at an ultrastructural level, translating into a mitochondrial 6
structure alteration [1]. Mitochondrial swelling and small vacuolization were found in 7
ADR treated rats, while HT partially protected mitochondria when administered alone 8
or in combination with ADR (Fig. 3A). With regards to mitochondrial area (Fig. 3B), 9
the highest values were found in ADR group, and a significant decrease was seen in 10
ADR+HT. In terms of altered mitochondria percentage (Fig. 3C), the ADR group had 11
the highest significant percentage. Both HT and ADR+HT groups exerted less 12
mitochondrial disturbance levels (Fig. 3C). 13
3.2.METC complexes and AIF 14
ADR-associated cardiotoxicity involves an impairment of METC complexes and 15
an inhibition in mitochondrial function [24-26]. METC complex content is presented in 16
Fig. 4. Lesser levels of complex-I-NDUFA9 subunit were found in HT group, while the 17
highest were found in ADR+HT group (Fig. 4A, 4G). ADR+HT group had a significant 18
increase of complex-I-NDUFS3 subunit (Fig. 4B, 4G). Higher amounts of complex-II 19
were found in ADR+HT and ADR, whereas control and HT groups reported the lowest 20
amounts of flavoprotein (Fig. 4C, 4G). When complex-III (CORE II subunit) was 21
tested, the highest quantity was seen in the control group, whereas HT exhibited the 22
lowest, closely followed by ADR and ADR+HT (Fig. 4D, 4G). Similar results were 23
found upon examination for complex-III-Rieske iron-sulfur protein (Fig. 4E, 4G). 24
Complex-IV was found in lesser quantities in all groups compared to control groups 25
Page 11
Page 10 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
10
(Fig. 4F, 4G). Finally, AIF significantly decreased in HT compared to other groups 1
(Fig. 5). 2
HT, ADR, and ADR+HT had significantly lower complex-I activity than control 3
(Fig. 6A). Trends demonstrate that HT group had similar complex-IV activity than 4
controls, while the lowest activities were seen in ADR and ADR+HT treated groups 5
(Fig. 6B). 6
3.3.Oxidative molecular damage 7
Amino acid oxidation in proteins was examined, specifically those carbonyl 8
products that suffer metal-catalyzed oxidation [27]. GSA arises from the metal-9
catalyzed oxidation of proline and arginine, while AASA results from lysine oxidation. 10
Moreover, it is known that third-party molecules are also involved in these chemical 11
pathways that link, on one hand, the increased free-radical efflux and, on the other hand, 12
structural modifications in proteins. These pathways may give rise to increased 2,4-13
dinitrophenylhydrazine-reactive carbonyls in proteins [28]. In this study, we 14
investigated the concentration of CEL and CML adducts. Those protein adducts were 15
first described as advanced-glycation-end-products (AGE), later named glycoxidation 16
products and now recognized as mixed AGEs-advanced lipoxidation products [21]. 17
Finally, lipid-peroxidation-derived protein damage was also demonstrated by MDAL. 18
The cardiac content of GSA, AASA, CEL, CML, and MDAL are shown in Table 2. The 19
highest values of those five markers were found in ADR group at significant levels. HT 20
was able to decrease the oxidative status of hearts subjected to ADR treatment 21
(ADR+HT group) by diminishing GSA, AASA, CML, and MDAL. Interestingly, GSA 22
and CML were lower in ADR+HT than controls. When alone, HT caused a marked 23
reduction of oxidative status of AASA, CEL, CML, and MDAL, even below the basal 24
oxidation status occurring in the control group. Finally, this work did not reveal any 25
Page 12
Page 11 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
11
significant changes in fatty acid composition, double bond, and peroxidizability indices 1
(Table 3). 2
4. Discussion 3
It has been postulated that adverse cardiac effects resulting from ADR 4
administration is not only dose- but also time-dependent (i.e. during and following 5
treatment) [29,30]. Evident toxicity associated with ADR based on plasma markers 6
(CK, LDH, ALT and AST), body and heart weight changes, and heart/body weight ratio 7
did not find in the experimental animals. These results are in accordance with studies by 8
Injac et al. [31] in rats with colorectal cancer models. 9
In this study, ADR induced significant histopathological changes in rat hearts 10
based in the Billingham’s grade as have been shown in Table 1. However, in accordance 11
with sublethal cumulative doses used in this study, results show that ADR did not cause 12
extensive damage in hearts with clinical manifestations. As has been shown in Fig. 2 a 13
slight vacuolization and inflammatory infiltrate in myocytes from ADR group were 14
found and hearts with a histopathology between abnormal without typical injury due to 15
ADR and an effect on less than 5% of the myocytes with proper lesions were caused by 16
ADR. Similar results have been previously reported in studies of chronic cardiotoxicity 17
attributed to ADR [30,32]. The low dose and the administration time of the ADR used 18
in this study showed important changes in ultrastructural results but not in 19
histopathological determinations. 20
At ultrastructural level, highly altered mitochondria were observed, as well as 21
swelling and presence of small vacuoles associated with ADR administration. These 22
results are in agreement with previous works at chronic low- [30,31] and high-doses of 23
ADR [32,34]. This is the first study addressing the protective role of HT on 24
mitochondrial disturbances associated with ADR-induced cardiotoxicity in breast 25
Page 13
Page 12 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
12
tumor-bearing rats. There is growing evidence supporting the protective role of HT on 1
mitochondria against harmful acrolein [35,36] and ischemia-reperfusion damage [15]. 2
Recently, Hao et al. [37] reported that HT stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and 3
promotes mitochondrial function in 3T3-L1 adipocytes by increasing: 1) PPARGC1α 4
(peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator 1 alpha) activation and protein 5
expression, 2) oxygen consumption, 3) mitochondrial DNA quantity, 4) number of 6
mitochondria, and 5) complexes-I, -II, -III, and –IV protein expression and activity 7
levels. A dual effect of HT was observed due to its ability to partially restore the 8
mitochondrial status (ADR+HT group); concomitantly, a slightly damaged in 9
mitochondria was found in HT group. This can be partially explained due to mechanical 10
injury during tissue handling, or even a plausible side-effect arising from HT redox 11
cycling. In this sense, Zhu et al. [36] reported that HT protects ARPE-19 human retinal 12
pigment epithelial cells from acrolein-induced oxidative damage through two 13
mechanisms: 1) induction of phase II detoxifying enzymes like γ-glutamyl cysteine 14
ligase, NAD(P)H quinine oxido-reductase-1 (NQO1) and heme oxygenase-1, and 2) 15
stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. 16
ADR did not affect the concentration of mitochondrial complex-I although it 17
affects the activity of this complex. It decreased complexes-III and -IV and increased 18
complex-II, result that agree with previous studies [30,38,39]. Complex-III-Rieske 19
subunit is a nuclear-encoded protein with an iron-sulfur [2Fe-2S] redox center that 20
mainly participates in the Q cycle by transferring an electron from ubiquinol to 21
cytochrome c1. Complex-III-CORE II subunit is also a nuclear-encoded protein 22
important for mitochondrial protein importing, processing and integrity of complex-III. 23
Genetic deletion of this subunit directly affects the complex-III assembling [40]. There 24
is a putative impairment of the integrity and assembling of complex-III by ADR, mainly 25
Page 14
Page 13 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
13
associated with low CORE II and unmodified Rieske subunits levels. Lesser activities 1
of both complex-I and –IV could enhance ROS production and subsequently limit ATP 2
production, as previously seen in vitro [30,41]. This is possibly causal, at least in part, 3
to enhanced ROS production by ADR in our study based on high steady-state levels of 4
oxidation-derived protein damage markers (CEL). Precursors of CEL formation are 5
derived from the glycolytic pathway. Thus, the increased levels of CEL described in the 6
present work in the ADR group can be ascribed to both a high oxidative stress status in 7
ADR-treated animals, as well as an increased glycolytic flux in this group in order to 8
compensate the low cellular energy state of the ADR-treated heart [4]. 9
HT did not modify the amounts of complex-I, -III (Rieske subunit) and -IV 10
proteins altered by ADR. Rather, it increased both complex-II and complex-III (CORE 11
II subunit) protein concentrations in comparison with the ADR group. These results 12
indicate that HT is able to improve the integrity of complex-III by increasing the CORE 13
II subunit without affecting the Rieske subunit. Since HT was not able to restore 14
complexes-I and -IV activities, it would be expected to maintain higher ROS 15
production. Nonetheless, these findings show that HT dramatically reversed oxidative 16
markers. Therefore, there must be mechanisms, as yet unclarified, by which HT 17
ameliorates oxidative stress and ADR-associated mitochondrial impairment. More 18
studies are needed in order to determine if HT protects electron transfer and decreases 19
ROS generation, without comprising ATP production. 20
In sharp contrast with Hao et al. [37], the present study shows that HT 21
significantly reduced the concentration of complexes-III and –IV. No differences were 22
seen for complexes-I and -II in comparison with controls. With regards to complex-I 23
and -IV activities, HT promotes a marked low activity of complex-I without affecting 24
the complex-IV activity. Taken together, these results show that METC is not affected 25
Page 15
Page 14 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
14
by HT. Therefore, a correct flow of electrons may be possible, and lesser ROS 1
generation would be expected. 2
HT did not increase the ROS-derived oxidative damage (GSA, AASA, CEL, 3
CML and MDAL). In its role as a powerful antioxidant, HT was able decrease the 4
oxidative status, even below basal oxidation for certain markers. It can be attributed to 5
its antioxidant effect because the lipids oxidations markers (the degree of membrane 6
unsaturation, fatty acid composition, double bond, and peroxidizability indexes) did not 7
change. 8
AIF is a ubiquitously expressed flavoprotein synthesized as a cytoplasmic 67 9
kDa precursor giving rise to a mature 62 kDa protein at the mitochondrial level. In 10
mitochondria, AIF is involved in oxidoreduction and is considered a potential ROS 11
scavenger [42,43]. This mitochondrial protein has both life and death functions in cells 12
and it is known to be also required for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [13]. 13
AIF-deficient cells exhibit a reduced content of complex-I, suggesting that a certain 14
amount of AIF is required for oxidative phosphorylation [39], all the while pointing 15
towards a role for AIF in the biogenesis of this complex. In this study AIF was only 16
decreased in the HT group, without change of complex-I amounts. This indicates that 17
substantial decreases in AIF are not large enough to become limiting for complex-I 18
biogenesis, and therefore, respiratory chain function is not comprised. Apoptotic or 19
antiapoptotic activity of HT is dependent on the cell type. 20
ADR clearly raised levels of oxidation-derived biomarkers, disrupted 21
mitochondria membrane and inhibited the METC. This could surely lead to an energy 22
imbalance in the cardiomyocytes. This scenario changes when ADR is administrated in 23
combination with HT. This antioxidant protects against ROS generation by ADR, as 24
Page 16
Page 15 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
15
shown by data from ROS-derived oxidative damage (GSA, ASAA, CEL, CML and 1
MDAL) and data from mitochondria ultrastructure. 2
In summary, the present study reveals, for the first time, that HT can attenuate 3
ADR-associated cardiac toxicity by reducing ROS production enhanced by ADR. 4
Moreover, HT ameliorates mitochondrial dysfunction by partially restoring the 5
respiratory chain altered by ADR chronic treatment in rat models of breast cancer 6
through an as yet undetermined mechanism. Herein, authors hypothesized that 7
hydroxytyrosol scavenges free radicals in mitochondria, and its redox cycling might be 8
responsible, at least in part, for the suitable electron transport from complex-I to the rest 9
of METC proteins. 10
11
Acknowledgements 12
We acknowledge grants from Excelentísima Diputación de Jaén, CEAS 13
Foundation 30.C0.244500 and Junta de Andalucía PI-0210/2007. We thank the Spanish 14
Ministry of Science and Innovation (AP2005-144) and the University of Granada for 15
the personal support of Dr. S. Granados-Principal. Work carried out at the Department 16
of Experimental Medicine was supported in part by R+D grants from the Spanish 17
Ministry of Science and Innovation (BFU2009-11879/BFI), the Spanish Ministry of 18
Health [RD06/0013/0012 and PI081843], the Autonomous Government of Catalonia 19
[2009SGR735] and COST B35 Action of the European Union. We thank Dr. Elvin 20
Blanco for help in editing of the final manuscript. 21
22
Conflict of interest statement 23
The authors have declared no conflict of interest. 24
25
Page 17
Page 16 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
16
References 1
[1] Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-2
Tortosa MC. New advances in molecular mechanisms and the prevention of 3
adriamycin toxicity by antioxidant nutrients. Food Chem Toxicol 2010;48:1425-4
1438 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.007 5
[2] Handa O, Naito Y, Fukui A, Omatsu T, Yoshikawa T. The impact of non-steroidal 6
anti-inflammatory drugs on the small intestinal epithelium. J Clin Biochem Nutr 7
2014;54:2-6. doi: 10.3164/jbc.13-84. 8
[3] Chen Y, Jungsuwadee P, Vore M, Butterfield DA, St Clair DK. Collateral damage 9
in cancer chemotherapy: oxidative stress in nontargeted tissues. Mol Interv 10
2007;7:147–156 doi: 10.1124/mi.7.3.6 11
[4] Tokarska-Schlattner M, Zaugg M, Zuppinger C, Wallimann T, Schlattner U. New 12
insights into doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: the critical role of cellular 13
energetic. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006;41:389-405 doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.06.009 14
[5] Bertinchant JP, Polge A, Juan JM, Oliva-Lauraire MC, Giuliani I, Marty-Double C, 15
Burdy JY, Fabbro-Peray P, Laprade M, Bali JP, Granier C, de la Coussaye JE, 16
Dauzat M. Evaluation of cardiac troponin I and T levels as markers of 17
myocardial damage in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy rats, and their 18
relationship with echocardiographic and histological findings. Clin Chim Acta 19
2003;329:39–51 doi: 10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00013-5 20
[6] Hoye AT, Davoren JE, Wipf P, Fink MP, Kagan VE. Targeting mitochondria. Acc 21
Chem Res 2008;41:87–97 doi: 10.1021/ar700135m. 22
[7] Berthiaume JM, Wallace KB. Adriamycin-induced oxidative mitochondrial 23
cardiotoxicity. Cell Biol Toxicol 2007;23:15–25 doi: 10.1007/s10565-006-0140-24
y 25
Page 18
Page 17 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
17
[8] Hulbert AJ, Pamplona R, Buffenstein R, Buttemer WA. Life and death: metabolic 1
rate, membrane composition, and life span of animals. Physiol Rev 2
2007;87:1175–1213 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00047.2006 3
[9] Tamura M, Matsui H, Kaneko T, Hyodo I. Alcohol is an oxidative stressor for 4
gastric epithelial cell: detection of superoxide in living cells. J Clin Biochem 5
Nutr 2013;53:75-80. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.13-32. 6
[10] Manabe E, Handa O, Naito Y, Mizushima K, Akagiri S, Adachi S, Takagi T, 7
Kokira S, Maoka T, Yoshikawa T. Astaxanthin protects mesangial cells from 8
hyperglycemia-induced oxidative signaling 2008;103:1925-1937 doi: 9
10.1002/jcb.21583 10
[11] Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Sanchez-Rovira P, 11
Ramirez-Tortosa MC. Hydroxytyrosol: from laboratory investigations to future 12
clinical trials. Nutr Rev 2010;68:191-206 doi: 10.1111/j.1753-13
4887.2010.00278.x 14
[12] Jemai H, El Feki A, Sayadi S. Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Effects of 15
Hydroxytyrosol and Oleuropein from Olive Leaves in Alloxan-Diabetic Rats. J 16
Agric Food Chem 2009;57:8798-8804 doi: 10.1021/jf901280r 17
[13] Lee-Huang S, Huang PL, Zhang D, Lee JW, Bao J, Sun Y, Chang YT, Zhang J, 18
Huang PL. Discovery of small-molecule HIV-1 fusion and integrase inhibitors 19
oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol: Part I. fusion [corrected] inhibition. Biochem 20
Biophys Res Commun 2007;354:872–878 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.071 21
[14] Lee-Huang S, Huang PL, Zhang D, Lee JW, Bao J, Sun Y, Chang YT, Zhang J, 22
Huang PL. Discovery of small-molecule HIV-1 fusion and integrase inhibitors 23
oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol: part II. integrase inhibition. Biochem Biophys 24
Res Commun 2007;354:879–884 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.058 25
Page 19
Page 18 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
18
[15] Mukherjee S, Lekli I, Gurusamy N, Bertelli AA, Das DK. Expression of the 1
longevity proteins by both red and white wines and their cardioprotective 2
components, resveratrol, tyrosol, and hydroxytyrosol. Free Radical Biol Med 3
2009;46:573–578 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.11.005 4
[16] Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Camacho-Corencia P, 5
Sanchez-Rovira P, Vera-Ramirez L, Ramirez-Tortosa MC. Hydroxytyrosol 6
inhibits growth and cell proliferation and promotes high expression of sfrp4 in 7
rat mammary tumours. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010;54:1–10 doi: 8
10.1002/mnfr.201000220 9
[17] Pamplona R. Membrane phospholipids, lipoxidative damage and molecular 10
integrity: a causal role in aging and longevity. Biochim Biophys Acta 11
2008;1777:1249-1262 doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.07.003 12
[18] Billingham ME. Role of endomyocardial biopsy in diagnosis and treatment of 13
heart disease. In: Silver MD editor. Cardiovascular Pathology, 2nd edition, New 14
York;1991, p.1465–1486 15
[19] Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image Processing with ImageJ. 16
Biophotonics International 2004;11:36-42 17
[20] Ochoa JJ, Pamplona R, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Granados-Principal S, Perez-Lopez 18
P, Naudi A, Portero-Otin M, López-Frías M, Battino M, Quiles JL. Age-related 19
changes in brain mitocondrial DNA deletion and oxidative stress are 20
differentially modulated by dietary fat type and coenzyme Q10. Free Radical 21
Biol Med 2011;50:1053-1064 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.02.004 22
[21] Quiles JL, Pamplona R, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Naudí A, Portero-Otin M, Araujo-23
Nepomuceno E, López-Frías M, Battino M, Ochoa JJ. Coenzyme Q addition to 24
an n-6 PUFA-rich diet resembles benefits on age-related mitochondrial DNA 25
Page 20
Page 19 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
19
deletion and oxidative stress of a MUFA-rich diet in rat heart. Mech Ageing Dev 1
2010;131:38-47 doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2009.11.004 2
[22] Pamplona R, Portero-Otín M, Requena J, Gredilla R, Barja G. Oxidative, 3
glycoxidative and lipoxidative damage to rat heart mitochondrial proteins is 4
lower after 4 months of caloric restriction than in age-matched controls. Mech 5
Ageing Dev 2002;123:1437-1446 doi: 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00076-3 6
[23] Herman EH, Ferrans VJ. Preclinical animal models of cardiac protection from 7
anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Semin Oncol 1998;25:15-21 8
[24] Mukhopadhyay P, Rajesh M, Bátkai S, Kashiwaya Y, Haskó G, Liaudet L, Szabó 9
C, Pacher P. Role of superoxide, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrite in doxorubicin-10
induced cell death in vivo and in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 11
2009;296:H1466-1483 doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00795.2008 12
[25] Carvalho RA, Sousa RP, Cadete VJ, Lopaschuk GD, Palmeira CM, Bjork JA, 13
Wallace KB. Metabolic remodeling associated with subchronic doxorubicin 14
cardiomyopathy. Toxicology 2010;270:92-98 doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.01.019 15
[26] Pointon AV, Walker TM, Phillips KM, Luo J, Riley J, Zhang SD, Parry JD, Lyon 16
JJ, Marczylo EL, Gant TW. Gant, Doxorubicin in vivo rapidly alters expression 17
and translation of myocardial electron transport chain genes, leads to ATP loss 18
and caspase 3 activation. PLoS One 2010;5:e12733 doi: 19
10.1371/journal.pone.0012733 20
[27] Requena, JR, Chao CC, Levine RL, Stadtman ER. Glutamic and aminoadipic 21
semialdehydes are the main carbonyl products of metal-catalyzed oxidation of 22
proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2001;2:69-74 doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.1.69 23
[28] Berlett BS, Stadtman ER. Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress. 24
J Biol Chem 1997;272:20313-2046 doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20313 25
Page 21
Page 20 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
20
[29] Yeung TK, Chakrabarti K, Wilding D, Hopewell JW. Modification of doxorubicin-1
induced cardiotoxicity: manipulation of the dosage schedule. Hum Exp Toxicol 2
2002;21: 607-614 doi: 10.1191/0960327102ht300oa 3
[30] Lebrecht D, Kirschner J, Geist A, Haberstroh,J, Walker UA. Respiratory chain 4
deficiency precedes the disrupted calcium homeostasis in chronic doxorubicin 5
cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Pathol 2010;19:167-174 doi: 6
10.1016/j.carpath.2009.06.006 7
[31] Injac R, Perse M, Cerne M, Potocnik N, Radic N, Govedarica B, Djordjevic A, 8
Cerar A, Strukelj B. Protective effects of fullerenol C60(OH)24 against 9
doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in rats with colorectal 10
cancer. Biomaterials 2009;30:1184-1196 doi: 11
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.060 12
[32] Della Torre P, Mazué G, Podestà A, Moneta D, Sammartini U, Imondi AR. 13
Protection against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in weanling rats by 14
dexrazoxane. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999;43:151-156 15
10.1007/s002800050876 16
[33] Ryu JS, Lee HS, Hong YS, Lee JJ, Sohn UD, Kim TY. In vivo antitumor efficacy 17
and cardiotoxicity of novel anthracycline ID6105 (11-hydroxy-aclacinomycin X, 18
Hyrubicin). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006;57:811-818 10.1007/s00280-19
005-0118-0 20
[34] Xiang P, Deng HY, Li K, Huang GY, Chen Y, Tu L, Ng PC, Pong NH, Zhao H, 21
Zhang L, Sung RY. Dexrazoxane protects against doxorubicin-induced 22
cardiomyopathy: upregulation of Akt and Erk phosphorylation in a rat model. 23
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009;63:343-349 doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0744-24
4 25
Page 22
Page 21 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
21
[35] Liu Z, Sun L, Zhu L, Jia X, Li X, Jia H, Wang Y, Weber P, Long J, Liu J. 1
Hydroxytyrosol protects retinal pigment epithelial cells from acrolein-induced 2
oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Neurochem 2007;103:2690-3
700 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04954.x 4
[36] Zhu L, Liu Z, Feng Z, Hao J, Shen W, Li X, Sun L, Sharman E, Wang Y, Wertz K, 5
Weber P, Shi X, Liu J. Hydroxytyrosol protects against oxidative damage by 6
simultaneous activation of mitochondrial biogenesis and phase II detoxifying 7
enzyme systems in retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Nutr Biochem 8
2010;21:1089-1098 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.09.006 9
[37] Hao J, Shen W, Yu G, Jia H, Li X, Feng Z, Wang Y, Weber P, Wertz K, Sharman 10
E, Liu J. Hydroxytyrosol promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial 11
function in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Nutr Biochem 2010;21:634-644 doi: 12
10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.03.012 13
[38] Purdom-Dickinson SE, Lin Y, Dedek M, Morrissy S, Johnson J, Chen QM. 14
Induction of antioxidant and detoxification response by oxidants in 15
cardiomyocytes: evidence from gene expression profiling and activation of Nrf2 16
transcription factor. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2007;42:159-176 doi: 17
10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.09.012 18
[39] Lebrecht D, Kokkori A, Ketelsen UP, Setzer B, Walker UA. Tissue-specific 19
mtDNA lesions and radical-associated mitochondrial dysfunction in human 20
hearts exposed to doxorubicin. J Pathol 2005;207:436-444 doi: 21
10.1002/path.1863 22
[40] Munusamy S, Saba H, Mitchell T, Megyesi JK, Brock RW, Macmillan-Crow LA. 23
Alteration of renal respiratory Complex-III during experimental type-1 diabetes. 24
BMC Endocr Disord 2009;9:2 doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-9-2 25
Page 23
Page 22 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
22
[41] Chandran K, Aggarwal D, Migrino RQ, Joseph J, McAllister D, Konorev EA, 1
Antholine WE, Zielonka J, Srinivasan S, Avadhani NG, Kalyanaraman B. 2
Doxorubicin inactivates myocardial cytochrome c oxidase in rats: 3
cardioprotection by Mito-Q. Biophys J 2009;96:1388-1398 doi: 4
10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.042 5
[42] Vahsen N, Candé C, Brière JJ, Bénit P, Joza N, Larochette N, Mastroberardino 6
PG, Pequignot MO, Casares N, Lazar V, Feraud O, Debili N, Wissing S, 7
Engelhardt S, Madeo F, Piacentini M, Penninger JM, Schägger H, Rustin P, 8
Kroemer G. AIF deficiency compromises oxidative phosphorylation. EMBO J 9
2004;23:4679-4689 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600461 10
[43] Otera H, Ohsakaya S, Nagaura Z, Ishihara N, Mihara K. Export of mitochondrial 11
AIF in response to proapoptotic stimuli depends on processing at the 12
intermembrane space. EMBO J 2005;24:1375-1386 doi: 13
10.1038/sj.emboj.7600614 14
15
16
Page 24
Page 23 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
23
Figure captions 1
Fig. 1. Representative traces of GC/MS analyses for specific protein oxidative damage 2
markers. Analyses were carried out by selected ion-monitoring GC/MS (SIM-GC/MS). 3
The amounts of product were expressed as µmoles of damage markers per mol of 4
lysine. Upper figure. Detection of the specific oxidation-derived protein carbonyl 5
glutamic semialdehyde (GSA) by SIM-GC/MS. Quantification was performed by 6
internal and external standardization using standard curves constructed from mixtures of 7
deuterated and non-deuterated standards. The ions used were: lysine and [2H8]lysine, 8
m/z 180 and 187, respectively; 5-hydroxy-2-aminovaleric acid and [2H5]5-hydroxy-2-9
aminovaleric acid (stable derivative of GSA), m/z 280 and 285, respectively. (A) 10
Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart proteins showing the m/z = 280 ion for the 11
different experimental conditions. (B) Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart 12
proteins showing the m/z = 180 ion for the different experimental conditions. (B1) 13
Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart proteins showing the m/z = 180 and 187 ions 14
(for protein lysine content quantification). (C) Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart 15
proteins showing the m/z = 280 and 285 ions (for protein GSA content quantification). 16
Lower figure. Detection of the specific glyco- and lipoxidation-derived protein marker 17
Nε-Carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) by SIM-GC/MS. Quantification was performed by 18
internal and external standardization using standard curves constructed from mixtures of 19
deuterated and non-deuterated standards. The ions used were: lysine and [2H8]lysine, 20
m/z 180 and 187, respectively; CML and [2H4]CML, m/z 392 and 396, respectively. 21
(A) Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart proteins showing the m/z = 392 ion for the 22
different experimental conditions. (B) Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart 23
proteins showing the m/z = 180 ion for the different experimental conditions. (B1) 24
Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart proteins showing the m/z = 180 and 187 ions 25
Page 25
Page 24 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
24
(for protein lysine content quantification). (C) Selected ion chromatograms for rat heart 1
proteins showing the m/z = 392 and 396 ions (for protein CML content quantification). 2
3
Fig. 2. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of rat cardiac tissue after chronic treatment with 4
doxorubicin. Arrows indicate cardiomyocyte cytoplasmic vacuolization (A), 5
inflammatory infiltrate (B), and atrial neuron vacuolization. Magnification: 40×. 6
7
Fig. 3. Effects of doxorubicin, hydroxytyrosol, and their combination on mitochondria. 8
Mitochondrial ultrastructure in heart (A), mitochondrial area (B), altered mitochondria 9
percentage (C). Magnification: 10,000×. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Letters, 10
when different, represent statistically significant differences (p< 0.05). Control: control 11
group; HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol; ADR: group treated with doxorubicin; 12
ADR+HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol and doxorubicin. 13
14
Fig. 4. Effects of doxorubicin, hydroxytyrosol, and their combination on protein levels. 15
Complex-I-NDUFA9 (39 kDa) (A) and -NDUFS3 (30 kDa) subunits (B), complex-II-70 16
kDa (Flavoprotein) subunit (C), complex-III-COREII (48 kDa) (D) and -Rieske iron-17
sulfur protein (29 kDa) subunits (E), and complex-IV-COXI (57 kDa) subunit (F) in rat 18
heart tissue. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n=5). Bars with different letters 19
significantly differ among the groups (p < 0.05). Control: control group; HT: group 20
treated with hydroxytyrosol; ADR: group treated with doxorubicin; ADR+HT: group 21
treated with hydroxytyrosol and doxorubicin. (G) Representative Western blots images 22
of the heart lysates from untreated animals (control group) and effects of doxorubicin 23
(ADR), hydroxytyrosol (HT), and their combination (ADR+HT) on mitochondrial 24
respiratory chain complexes levels (from CI to CIV). 25
Page 26
Page 25 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
25
1
Fig. 5. Effects of doxorubicin, hydroxytyrosol and their combination on the protein 2
levels of AIF in heart. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n=5). Bars with different 3
letters significantly differ among groups (p< 0.05). Control: control group; HT: group 4
treated with hydroxytyrosol; ADR: group treated with doxorubicin; ADR+HT: group 5
treated with hydroxytyrosol and doxorubicin. Representative Western blots images of 6
the heart lysates from untreated animals (control group) and effects of doxorubicin 7
(ADR), hydroxytyrosol (HT), and their combination (ADR+HT) on AIF protein levels. 8
9
Fig. 6. Activities of mitochondrial complexes-I (A) and -IV (B) in rats treated with 10
hydroxytyrosol, doxorubicin, and their combination compared to controls. Values are 11
expressed as means ± SEM (n=5). Bars with different letters significantly differ among 12
groups (p< 0.05). Control: control group; HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol; ADR: 13
group treated with doxorubicin; ADR+HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol and 14
doxorubicin. 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 27
Page 26 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
26
Table Footnotes
1Abbreviations: AASA, aminoadipic semialdehyde; ADR, doxorubicin; AIF,
Apoptosis-inducing factor; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate
aminotransferase; CEL, Nε-(carboxyethyl)-lysine; CK, creatinine kinase; CML, N
ε-
(carboxymethyl)-lysine; DBI, double bond index; GSA, Glutamic semialdehyde; HT,
hydroxytyrosol; i.v.: intravenous; LDH, lactate d1ehydrogenase; MDAL, N
ε-
malondialdehyde-lysine; METC, mitochondrial electron transport chain; NQO1,
NAD(P)H quinine oxido-reductase-1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TUNEL, terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP-nick-end labeling
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 28
Page 27 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Table 1. Effects of doxorubicin, hydroxytyrosol and their combination on
histopathology, body and heart weights, and plasma parameters of cardiac injury in rat
hearts
Group Control HT ADR ADR+HT
Billingham’s grade 0±0a
0±0a
0.75±0.163b
0.938±0.147b
Body weight (g) 271.4±8.9 266.6±7.4 256.0±3.3 253.8±6.0
Heart weight (g) 1.04±0.034 1.03±0.032 0.93±0.037 0.97±0.03
Heart/body weight
ratio (mg/g)
3.88±0.2 3.88±0.1 3.63±0.13 3.82±0.17
CK (U/L) 103.0±17 64.0±19 164.0±45 151.0±77
LDH (U/L) 376.0±66 323.0±68 304.0±33 327.0±91
ALT (U/L) 21.9±8.5 10.7±3.5 11.3±3.9 15.0±3.8
AST (U/L) 33.6±8.9 18.9±2.8 14.9±2.7 17.7±2.9
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Letters, when different, represent statistically
significant differences (p< 0.05). Control: control group; HT: group treated with
hydroxytyrosol; ADR: group treated with doxorubicin; ADR+HT: group treated with
hydroxytyrosol and doxorubicin. CK: creatinine kinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase;
ALT: alanine aminotranferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase.
Table 1
Page 29
Page 28 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Table 2. Effects of hydroxytyrosol, doxorubicin and their combination on oxidation-derived
protein damage markers in rat hearts
Control HT ADR ADR+HT
GSA (µmol/mol Lys) 2424.9±131.1ab
2697.6±141.8ab
3818.6±694.8b
2180.2±178.8a
AASA (µmol/mol Lys) 302.9±10.8a
260.5±7.8a
444.5±53.0b
325.0±6.5a
CEL (µmol/mol Lys) 382.8±2.9a
354.8±53.0a
521.3±39.8b
424.8±29.1ab
CML (µmol/mol Lys) 949.4±10.4a
747.5±52.1a
1279.1±109.9b
911.8±3.7a
MDAL (µmol/mol Lys) 305.1±13.0a
269.4±10.6a
505.6±39.6b
346.4±17.7a
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Letters, when different, represent statistically significant
differences (p< 0.05). GSA, Glutamic semialdehyde; AASA, aminoadipic semialdehyde; CEL,
carboxyethyl-lysine; CML, carboxymethyl-lysine; MDAL, malondialdehyde-lysine. Control:
control group; HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol; ADR: group treated with doxorubicin;
ADR+HT: group treated with hydroxytyrosol and doxorubicin.
Table 2
Page 30
Page 29 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Table 3. Effects of hydroxytyrosol, doxorubicin, and their combination on fatty acid
profile in rat hearts
Control HT ADR ADR+HT
14:0 1.18±0.12 1.10±0.07 1.22±0.13 1.12±0.19
16:0 21.38±1.18 22.08±0.7
0
23.11±1.22 23.20±1.55
16:1n-7 0.86±0.0.07 0.74±0.04 0.96±0.10 0.97±0.0.16
18:0 27.61±1.08 29.97±0.3
6
27.25±0.80 28.96±0.10
18:1n-9 14.34±0.45 14.39±0.6
0
14.76±0.75 12.79±0.84
18:2n-6 8.74±1.27 5.89±0.47 7.21±1.46 6.04±0.69
18:3n-3 0.36±0.06 0.44±0.07 0.45±0.08 0.34±0.05
18:4n-6 2.68±0.11 2.88±0.22 2.28±0.17 2.71±0.26
20:0 1.15±0.07 1.14±0.07 0.97±0.08 1.02±0.20
20:3n-6 0.26±0.03 0.22±0.01 0.20±0.02 0.23±0.01
20:4n-6 8.18±1.21 6.68±1.09 7.64±1.12 7.75±0.19
20:5n-3 0.82±0.10 0.97±0.06 0.73±0.04 0.62±0.10
22:0 1.75±0.13 2.23±0.18 1.64±0.13 1.71±0.26
22:4n-6 0.71±0.12 0.67±0.08 0.76±0.11 0.67±0.06
22:5n-6 0.99±0.02 1.29±0.07 1.35±0.15 1.99±0.28
22:5n-3 0.99±0.08 1.09±0.10 0.98±0.11 0.98±0.07
24:0 0.31±0.02 0.34±0.05 0.39±0.06 0.47±0.08
22:6n-3 3.94±0.0.50 3.24±0.51 4.46±0.66 4.14±0.75
Table 3
Page 31
Page 30 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
24:5n-3 1.25±0.15 1.59±0.28 1.23±0.13 1.54±0.30
24:6n-3 2.43±0.22 3.01±0.31 2.39±0.26 2.71±0.54
ACL 18.29±0,07 18.32±0,0
4
18.27±0.09 18.33±0.15
SFA 53.39±2.45 56.86±1.0
9
54.58±2.03 56.48±2.59
UFA 46.60±2,45 43.14±1.0
9
45.42±2.03 43.51±2.60
MUFA 15.20±0,48 15.14±0.6
1
15.72±0.76 13.76±0.99
PUFA 31.40±2,76 28.00±1.3
6
29.69±2.55 29.75±3,517
PUFAn-3 9.80±0,57 10.36±0.4
3
10.25±0.91 10.35±1.50
PUFAn-6 21.59±2,31 17.64±1.4
5
19.45±2.03 19.41±2.11
DBI 135.40±9,21 127.98±5.
62
133.72±9.7
5
135.85±15.6
5
PI 132.14±9,44 128.31±5.
46
132.20±11.
71
137.78±18.8
5
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Page 32
Page 31 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 1
Figure 1
Page 33
Page 32 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure B
Figure C
Page 34
Page 33 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 2
Page 35
Page 34 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 3
Page 36
Page 35 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
G
Figure 4
Page 37
Page 36 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 5
Page 38
Page 37 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 6
Page 39
Page 38 of 38
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
*Graphical Abstract (for review)