Top Banner
David Hand, US Fish and Wildlife Service John Beeman, US Geological Survey
19

Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Jan 25, 2017

Download

Environment

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

David Hand, US Fish and Wildlife ServiceJohn Beeman, US Geological Survey

Page 2: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Overview of Columbia River

Timeline of dam construction+fishpassage

Highlight major themes

Implications for the Mekong

Page 3: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Length : 2,000 km.

Source: Columbia Lake, British Columbia

Drainage area: - 67 million hectares- Larger than France,

Belgium, & Netherlands combined

- 7,500 cms daily mean flow

- 219 major dams: … 176 in U.S. … 43 in Canada

Columbia River

Page 4: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Columbia Mekong

Catchment (km2) 670,000 795,500

Length (km) 2,000 4,900

Mean discharge (m3s-1) 7,500 14,500

Number of fish species ~100 800-1,100

Mainstem Dams

(existing or planned)

15 19

Tributary Dams

(existing or planned)

>250 ~200

Adapted from Ferguson et al 2011 and D. Wills USFWS 4

Page 5: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River
Page 6: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

MainstemDam Construction Begins

-Rock Island-Bonneville-Grand Coulee

6

Page 7: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

-McNary-Chief Joseph-The Dalles-Brownlee

7

Page 8: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

-Rocky Reach-Priest Rapids-Wanapum-Wells

-Oxbow-Ice Harbor-Hells Canyon-Lower Monumental

8

Page 9: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

-John Day-Little Goose-Lower Granite

9

Page 10: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Downstream passage through turbines

Upstream passage through fish ladders

USACE

Bonneville ladder,ODOT

Page 11: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Downstream Spill Surface weirs Flow Augmentation Juvenile Bypass Transportation Turbine redesign

Upstream Lamprey Passage

Systems Spill Patterns

Page 12: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Fish Conservation=Power Generation

Government/Legal Driven Treaties, NW Power Act,

Endangered Species

Broad goals measurable objectives

Basing decision on SCIENCE

CRITFC

Lamprey counts Granite Dam

Page 13: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Initial salmonid focus

13

Page 14: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Initial salmonid focus

Salmon passage non-salmon passage

14

NOAA

14

Page 15: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Assess Problem

Design

Implement

Monitor

Evaluate

Adjust

Test passage designs

Rigorous monitoring

Flexibility

15

Page 16: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

80+ years of work Complex Long-term

monitoring Financial

$US 500 Million annually

$US 3.3 Billion 1982-2001

Forgone power generation

Spill at Bonneville Dam, USACE

USGS

16

Page 17: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River

Columbia Mekong

Political Will Strong

Measurable Objectives

Developing

Broad Goals

Ecosystem Approach

100 species >1,000 species

Little knownAdaptive Management

Monitoring

Flexible

Limited monitoring

Inflexible

Long Term Commitment

80+ years

Costly

Unknown

Limited $17

Page 18: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River
Page 19: Hydropower in the Columbia River: History of Fish Passage Development and Implications for the Mekong River