OFFICE REPORT FEBRUARY 1992 SACRAMENT.O-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA CALIFORNIIA SPECIAL STUDY HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District USCE-RTS- 8-022.10
OFFICE REPORT FEBRUARY 1992
SACRAMENT.O-SAN JOAQUIN DELTACALIFORNIIA
SPECIAL STUDY
HYDROLOGY
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Sacramento District
USCE-RTS-8-022.10
SECTION SU13JEC
1.
PAGE
Purpose and Scope 1
A. General 1
B. Exclusions I
C. Interior Drainage I
D. Hydraulic Modeling 1
E. Future Land Use 1
F. Usage I
G. Levee Crown Profiles 2
2. Results
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
2
Study Area 2
A. General 2
B. Flood Characteristics 3
C. Tidal Hydraulics 3
Stage-Frequency Analysis 4
A. General 4
B. Stage Data 4
C. Results 7
1. Sacramento River at Rio Vista 8
Wind-Wave Runup 13
A. General 13
B. Wind Analysis 13
Maximum Water-Surface, Elevations
Levee Crown Profiles
LIST OF TABLES-
13
14
TABLE SjjBffiCT PAGE
1. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Contributing Area 3
2. Stage Recording Locations 5
3. Sacramento River - Mokelumne River Peak Stages 9
4. San Joaquin River Peak Stages 10
5. Old River, Middle River and 11
Grant Line Canal Peak Stages
6. 50- and 100-year Stages 12
7. Wind Wave Calculations 15
8. Zero Station Index 16
9. Levee Crown Survey Dates is
i
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART SUBJEC
1. General Map and Gaging Station Locations
1A. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Contributing Drainage Area
2. Sacramento River at Collinsville Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
3. Sacramento River at 3-Mile Slough Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
4. Sacramento River at Rio Vista Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
5. Sacramento River at Walnut Grove Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
6. Sacramento River at Snodgrass Slough Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
7. Sacramento River at I-Street Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
8. Mokelumne River at New Hope Landing Peak Stage-Frequency
Curve
9. Georgiana Slough at Mokelumne River Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
10. San Joaquin River at Antioch Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
11. San Joaquin River at 3-Mile Slough Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
12 San Joaquin River at San Andreas Landing Peak Stage-Frequency
Curve
13. San Joaquin River at Venice Island Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
14. San Joaquin River at Rindge Pump Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
15. San Joaquin River at Bums Cutoff Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
16. San Joaquin River at Brandt Bridge Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
17 San Joaquin River at Mossdale Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
18. Old River at Rock Slough Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
19. Old River at Byron Tract Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
20. Old River at Clifton Court Peak Stage-Frequency Curve21. Old River at Tracy Road Bridge Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
22. Grant Line Canal at Tracy Road Bridge Stage-Frequency Curve
23. Middle River at Bacon Island Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
24. Middle River at Borden Highway Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
25. Middle River at Mowry Bridge Peak Stage-Frequency Curve
26. Wave Runup Locations and Fetch Diagram26A. Atlas Tract Water-Surface Elevations
27. Bacon Island Water-Surface Elevations
28. Bethel Island Water-Surface Elevations
29. Bishop Tract Water-Surface Elevations
30. Bouldin Island Water-Surface Elevations
31. Brack Tract Water-Surface Elevations
32. Bradford Island Water-Surface Elevations
33. Brannan Andrus Island Water-Surface Elevations
34. Byron Tract Water-Surface Elevations
ii
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART SjLBjB!QT
35. Canal Ranch Tract Water-Surface Elevations
36. Coney Island Water-Surface Elevations
37. Dead Horse Island Water-Surface Elevations
37A. Drexler Tract Water-Surface Elevations
38. Empire Tract Water-Surface Elevations
39. Fabian Tract Water-Surface Elevations
40. Fay Island Water-Surface Elevations
41. Holland Tract Water-Surface Elevations
42. Hotchkiss Tract Water-Surface Elevations
43. Lower Jones Tract Water-Surface Elevations
44. Upper Jones Tract Water-Surface Elevations
45. King Island Water-Surface Elevations
46. Little Mandeville Tract Water-Surface Elevations
47. Mandeville Island Water-Surface Elevations
48. McCormack-Williamson Tract Water-Surface Elevations
49. McDonald Island Water-Surface Elevations
50. Medford Island Water-Surface Elevations
50A. Mildred Island Water-Surface Elevations
51. New Hope Tract Water-Surface Elevations
52. Orwood Tract Water-Surface Elevations
53. Palm Tract Water-Surface Elevations
54. Pescadero Tract Water-Surface Elevations
55. Pico Naglee. Tract Water-Surface Elevations
56. Quimby Island Water-Surface Elevations
56A. RD17 Water-Surface Elevations
57. Rindge Tract Water-Surface Elevations
58. Rio Blanco Tract Water-Surface Elevations
59. Lower Roberts Island Water-Surface Elevations
59A. Middle Roberts Island Water Surface Elevations
60. Upper Roberts Island Water-Surface Elevations
WA. Sargent-Barnhart Water-Surface Elevations
61. Sherman Island Water-Surface Elevations
62. Shima Tract Water-Surface Elevations
63. Shin Kee Tract Water-Surface Elevations
64. Stark Tract Water-Surface Elevations
65. Staten Island Water-Surface Elevations
65A. Stewart Tract Water-Surface Elevations
66. Terminous Tract Water-Surface Elevations
67. Twitchell Island Water-Surface Elevations
iii
LIST OF CH"TS
CHART SUBJECT
68. Tyler Island Water-Surface Elevations
69. Union Island Water-Surface Elevations
69A. Veale Tract Water-Surface Elevations
70, Venice Island Water-Surface Elevations
71. Victoria Island Water-Surface Elevations
71A. Walnut Grove Water-Surface Elevations
72. Webb Tract Water-Surface Elevations
73. Woodward Island Water-Surface Elevations
74. Wright-Elmwood Tract Water-Surface Elevations
75. Levee Stationing Base Map Index
76.-91. Levee Stationing Base Maps
iv
r1MPQSE_ AND SCOPE -
A. General - This report presents stage-frequency curves for 24 tide gage locations,
wave runup data for 12 locations and 50-, 100- and 300-year maximum water-surface
elevation plots around the islands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The stage-
frequency curves in this report are updates to the stage-frequency curves presented in
the report entitled "Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, Stage-Frequency Study,
Hydrology" and dated December 1976. The stage-frequency curves in this report
include stage data recorded through water year 1988.
B. Exclusions - This report does not address FEMA guidelines. The stage-frequency
curves do not reflect any expected probability adjustment. The stage-frequency
curves and maximum water-surface elevation plots reflect present conditions. They do
not show the effects of any proposed dams, levee improvements, possible levee
failures or Delta operational changes.
C. Interior Drainage - A study of interior drainage for the Delta islands was not
included in the scope of this report. At this time it is not known if projects win be
feasible on any of the islands. Any future levee improvement projects will address
interior drainage on a-case-by-ease basis.
D. Delta Maximum Water-Surface Elevation Plots - The maximum water-surface
elevation plots presented in this report were not developed using a hydraulic model.
They were derived from the stage-frequency curves by, in most cases, straightlining
between gaging stations. See page 13 for an explanation.
E. Future Conditions - The effects on the stage-frequency curves and maximumwater-surface elevations due to future land development were not studied. Due to the
size of the drainage area contributing flow to the Delta, it is not expected that land
use changes will have an appreciable effect on the water-surface elevations in the
Delta.
If future projects include levee raising or construction of new levees, then these
features will have to be analyzed to determine their impacts on the water-surface
elevations at adjacent locations. Possible impacts would have to be studied when a
particular project is proposed.
F. Usage - The data provided in this report will be used in Phase I of the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Special Study. The purpose of the Special Study is to
recommend islands or groups of islands for possible levee projects. The Special Studywill use the maximum water-surface elevation plots to perform the following:
A. The 300-year water-surface will be used to estimate levee construction
costs.
B. Determine the approximate probability of overtopping at levee low spots.
C. To set stages within the islands to compute damages.
I
The levee construction cost information will be used as part of the benefit-cost
economic analysis which will determine the feasibility of a proposed levee project.
The islands selected in Phase, I will be analyzed in Phase 11. Phase 11 will be a
feasibility level study. During the Phase 11 study, it will be necessary to determine
what effects a proposed levee project will have in the surrounding area and if any
mitigation measures are necessary. The method of analyzing these effects win be
determined when Phase I is completed and it is known which islands will be
recommended for Phase 11 studies. It is possible that hydraulic modeling will be
necessary.
Phase 11 studies should include some type of risk analysis to determine the final NEDplan.
G. 1,evee Crown Profiles - Levee crown profiles plotted on Charts 27-74 were
surveyed by the Engineering firm retained by,44fe respective Reclamation District.
Dates of the surveys are shown on Table
2. RESULTS - Locations of Delta gaging stations ~an be found on Chart 1. Stage-frequency
curves are plotted on Charts 2-25. Locations where wave runup calculations were made are
shown on Chart 26. Charts 27 through 74 show the 50-, 100- and 300-year maximum water-
surface elevations around the Delta Islands. Charts 76 through 91 show the levee stationing
around each island. Caution should be used when using the stationing on the water-surface
plots since station zero on the plot is not always at the same location as station zero on the
base map. Column 4 of Table 8, pages 16 and 17, lists the station on the base map that
corresponds to station zero on the water-surface plots for each island. Tables 3 through 5,
pages 9-11, list yearly maximum stage readings at each gage location in the Delta. Table 6,
page 12, tabulates the 50- and 100-year stages. Table 7, page 15, tabulates the wind-wave
calculations. The adequacy of the results of the study along with general assumptions are
presented on page 7, paragraph C.
3. STUDY AREA -
A. General - The Delta, which covers more than 1,000 square miles, is in Central
California. It is situated upstream of the confluence of the Sacramento and San
Joaquin Rivers at the head of Suisun Bay, the most easterly extending arm of the San
Francisco Bay system. In general, the Delta extends from about Sacramento on the
north, to Stockton on the south, and near Pittsburg on the west, This region, which
is very flat, has been reclaimed from a natural tidal area by hundreds of miles of
levees along natural and manmade waterways that divide it into about 100 tracts
locally know as "islands". Land elevations range from just above mean sea level to
10 feet below mean sea level. Before islands were reclaimed, much of the Delta wascoveted by water from the daily tide cycle. During times of high runoff from the
Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins, much of the Delta would be flooded. Chart I is
a map of the Delta region.
B. ]Flood Characteristics - The contributing drainage area to the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta encompasses approximately 40,000 square miles. Chart IA shows the
2
contributing drainage area and Table I lists the approximate drainage areas.
TABLE I
SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA CONTRWUMG AREA
RIVER SYSTEM DRAINAGE AREA (sq. mi.)
Sacramento 25,200
San Joaquin 13,500
Mokelunme 1,200
Chart 1A and Table I show that the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta derives its name
from it's two main contributors, the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. Flows in
these systems come from areas that are geographically and physically different.
A review of annual maximum stages in the Delta shows that in some years the annual
maximum stage at all locations will be occur during the same storm event. However,
in other years, the peak stages in the northern part of the Delta occur during a
different time period than those in the southern part of the Delta and vice versa. Ile
differences are caused by the geographical distribution of the contributing drainage
basin and the fluctuation of the storm track over California. If the main section of a
storm system drops it's precipitation over the Sacramento River basin, the stages will
be higher in the northern part of the Delta. If the main section is over the San
Joaquin, then the stages will be higher in the southern part.
Also contributing to the puzzle is the tidal influence of the Pacific Ocean. The tides
can have a profound effect on the stages especially in the lower and central parts of
the Delta. If high tides combine with high runoff events very high stages will result.
In summary, the maximum stages result from storms of different origins which do not
have the same frequency at all locations, and from tides of varying magnitudes which
seldom reach their maximum stages concurrently with the peak flows.
C. Tidal Hydraulics - The normal tide cycle has two high stages and two low stages
in a day. Tides follow the moon more closely than they do the sun, and the lunar or
tidal day is about 50 minutes longer than the solar day. This causes the tide to occur
later each day, and the tide that has occurred near the end of one calendar day will be
followed by a corresponding tide that may skip the next day and occur in the early
morning of the third day. Thus on certain days of each month only a single high or
single low water occurs. At some stations, during portions of each month, the tide
becomes diurnal, that is, only one high and one low water will occur during the
period of a lunar day.
During a low flow period, tidal effects can be seen on the Sacramento River at
Verona and the San Joaquin River at Mossdale. During periods of high flow, the
3
tidal effects are dampened upstream of the delta. As the high flows enter the Delta,
they are affected by the tidal cycle. The hourly gage readings in the central and
lower sections of the Delta will reflect the tidal variation, even during high flow
periods.
The times that high flows are concurrent with high tides in the delta is when extreme
elevations occur. The incoming tide from the Pacific Ocean will have a tendency to
slow down and backup the incoming high flows to the Delta. When this "stacking"
occurs, especially with high wind periods, levee flood fights are a common sight.
4. $TAGE-FREQIJENCY ANALYSIS -
A. General - Selection of gages for analysis in this study was based primarily on
availability of records. The 24 gages selected were judged to have the most suitable
records and proper areal distribution in the Delta. The datum of most of the gages
selected has changed one or two times during the period of record. Therefore, all of
the records were adjusted to a datum of zero elevation, mean sea level (NGVD of
1929) to maintain continuity among all stations. Table 2 shows the gages analyzed.
B. Stage Data - Many stage recording gages have been installed in the Delta over the
past 50-60 years. Depending on the need for information at specific sites, some gages
have been short lived while others have a long record. Until 1976, stage data were
published annually in the 130 Series Bulletins of the California Department of Water
Resources. Since 1976, stage data are being stored by the California Department of
Water Resources Central District Office, Data and Operations Branch, Sacramento,
California. This agency is to be contacted for obtaining unpublished tidal records.
4
TABLE 2
STAGE RECORDING LOCATIONS
GAGE LOCATIONI
I.D NUMBER' CATIONI I,D NUMBER'
SACRAMENTO RIVER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Collinsville B9-1110 Antioch B9-5020
nrco-Mile Slough 139-1160 Thmc~-Milc Slough 139-5060
Rio Vista B9-1210 San Andreas Landing B9-5100
Walnut Grove BR-1650 Venice Island B9-5580
Snodgrass Slough B9-1750 Rindge Pump B9-5620
I Street Bridge AO-2100 Burns Cutoff B9-5660
OLD RIVER Brandt Bridge B9-5740
Rock Slough 139-5180 Mossdale Bridge B9-5820
Byron Tract B9-5270 MIDDLE RIVER
Clifton Court Ferry 139-5340 Bacon Island B9-5460
Tracy Road Bridge 139-5380 Borden Highway 139-5500
OTHER STATIONS Mowry Bridge B9-5540
Grant Line Canal at Tracy
Road Bridge
139-5300
S.F Mokelumne River at
New Hope Bridge
B9-5140
Ceorgiana Slough at
Makriumnr, RiverI
B9-4100
I I. D. Number - Station Identification number used in the Department of Water Resources Series 130 Bulletins.
5
The many factors influencing stages in the Delta include tides, inflow from Central
Valley streams, and high winds. Barometric pressure, land subsidence, recorder
malfunction, vandalism, and other miscellaneous factors also may influence readings
from continuously recording stage gages. Stage data known to be erroneous due to
gage malfunction or some other cause are adjusted prior to their publication.
Land subsidence, which is constantly occurring in the Delta, results in erroneously
high readings. Bench marks throughout the Delta are periodically resurveyed to
correct for land subsidence. When a bench mark is updated, the tide gage datum is
resurveyed and updated by the agency maintaining the gage. Department of Water
Resources and Corps of Engineers tide gages were updated in 1976. Currently, the
Delta area is in the process of being included in the Global Positioning System (GPS).
This system, using data from satellites, will tie the benchmarks in the Delta to those
in the more geologically stable foothill areas in order to access subsidence in the
Delta and adjust the benchmarks to correct for subsidence.
Tables 3 through 5 summarize the higher-high stage data, adjusted to mean sea level,
that have been recorded at the stations listed in Table 2. The period of 1945-1988
was selected for analysis. 'Ibis period covers the maximum length of record for most
stations, coincides with the post Shasta era and the hydraulics of the Delta have not
significantly changed during this period. Operation of the major storage projects in
the Sacramento River Basin is coordinated with operation of Shasta Dam to maintain,
as much as possible, decreed water quality standards near Antioch.
Stage data for each station were compared with data from neighboring stations and,
when necessary, adjusted to obtain consistency. Ilese data were plotted using
weibull plotting positions. The weibull equation is shown below.
P= ---~L
N+1
Where:
P=Plotting Position
M=Order of sequence with 1
being largest
N=Number of items in data set
Curves were then drawn graphically to fit the data. The curves are shown on Charts
2 through 25. Once the curves were drawn they were reviewed as a group and
adjusted, if necessary, to maintain consistency. This review showed:
1. The statistical parameters were inconsistent from gage to gage along the sameriver.
2. The computed frequency curves do not reflect inundation of large areas from levee
6
failures. The curves were smoothed to remove any localized effects of a levee
failure.
3. The maximum elevation on a stage-frequency curve does not exceed the height of
the levee crowns at that location. The curves are drawn solid up to the 100-year
level. This reflects the reliability of the gaged data. Above the 100-year elevation, the
stage-frequency curves are dashed. The curves are dashed above the 100-year level
due to the many uncertainties that can occur at the higher frequencies. No stations
have a period of record long enough to have actual data that would have a plotting
position rarer than the 100-year event. Therefore, in order to estimate elevations of
frequencies greater than the 100-year, the curves are extrapolated based on judgement
and the shape of the curve below the 100-year. The height of the adjacent levee
crown is also taken into account. The stage-frequency curves do not exceed the
height of the adjacent levee crown.
C. Results - The 50- and 100-year higher-high stages at the 24 stations used in the
analysis are shown in Table 6. In an attempt to determine the conditions that would
cause a 100-year ffood stage, or any other high flood stage, historical events were
examined to establish the influence of wind, flood inflow, tidal cycle and barometric
pressure on Delta stages. It was concluded that many combinations of thew
parameters could be possible, each with a varying degree of probability, and that
predicting the factors which cause a particular high stage, or the effect of changes in
one or more parameters, would be quite difficult.
When the stage-frequency data in this memorandum are used, it must be understood
that:
I-
For any particular frequency, the stage shown on the stage-frequency curve
is valid only for that station. A stage created by any combination of high
flows, tide, extreme barometric pressure, and winds could give a 100-year
stage at one station and something of greater or lesser frequency at
neighboring stations.
2. A maximum water-surface elevation plot developed for a particular
frequency by straight-line connection of elevations from a series of stage-
frequency curves will give an elevation higher, at some locations along the
reach, than a historical event of corresponding frequency, This is due to the
variation in width, depth and bottom slope of Delta-channels. However, the
error resulting from straight line elevations is less than 0.3 foot.
3. The stage data presented are for static water conditions. Wave action from
wind, boats or other sources must be added to any stage data being analyzed.
Wind set and any other hydrologic action that increases stages are reflected in
the static stage data.
1. Sacramento River at Rio Vista - The stage recording gage for the Sacramento
7
River at Rio Vista was relocated from the Army Yard to the Rio Vista Bridge in
1981. The stage-frequency curve for the Bridge location is shown on Chart 4.
Based on the stage-frequency analyses for the American River Study, it was
determined that the 1986 peak stages fell within the 50-90 year frequency, depending
on location. The curve for Rio Vista was drawn to remain consistent with this finding
and with the shape of the stage-frequency curve for Sacramento River at Threemile
Slough. The 1986 peak stage at Rio Vista reflects approximately an 80 year
frequency.
The records at the new and old gage sites have 5 years of overlapping record. The
new location is slightly more than a mile upstream of the old location. However, for
all five overlapping years, the peak stage at the new location was lower than the peak
stage at the old location. There are many questions about subsidence and the
reliability of surveyed bench marks in the Rio Vista area, This area is currently
being included in the Global Positioning System in order to get a better handle on the
amounts of subsidence occuring in the area. No data points are plotted on Chart 4
due to datum uncertainties. The data cannot be adjusted to mean sea level datum until
the benchmark elevations in this area are verified.
8
p91
ok
91
P~
898
88
Mis
is
~g
a19
9aZI
a
m
sm
ta
ig
a2;
gH
is
is
Ss
910
88
s8v11
Sa
8-8
t
~
a
gll
m
82
as
It
is
9a
u4ii
vit
g
g
s
K8
Sasa
bt
8a8g
m
g!A
a
8~r
OT
................ta
pMp
................kkiltAt8888aaI
lis
iskkisit9aaaa11
9Rial99iR951i111jii
isa
tsKS8a9
CIO
PM,8cq
tz
t7'
m
- - - - - - - - - - -
'i 4 6 'd 'd
4 4 .4 i A
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R2.9 tigq 2 8 ~s;~gg~ ~nats, Stagg v~d 6 "i 4
Bi
IL-
11
TABLE 6
SO- and 100-YEAR STAGES
Froquency
Curvr, Number
Location
SACRAMENTO RIVER
50-Ycar 100-Year
2 Collinsvilla 6.3 6.4
3 Three-Mile Slough 7.7 7.9
4 Rio Vista 8.3 8.7
5 Walnut Grove 14.4 15.0
6 Snodgrass Slough 20.1 20.6
7 I-Strect. 30.4 31.4
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
10 Antioch 6.3 6.5
11 Threo-Mile Slough 6.3 6.4
12 San Andreas Landing 6.8 7.0
13 Venice Island 7,1 7.4
14 Rindge Pump 7.2 7.4
15 Bums Cutoff 7.4 7.6
16 Brandt Bridge 14.9 17.0
17 Mossdale 22.4 25.0
OLD RIVER
18 Rook Slough 6,8 7.2
19 Byron Tract 7.3 7.6
20 Clifton Court 7.5 7.8
21 Tracy Bridge 8.8 9.2
MMDLE RIVER
23 Bacon Island 6'9 7.2
24 Borden Highway 7.3 7.6
25 Mowry Bridge 12.8 13.4
OTHER STATIONS
22 Grant Line, Canal at Tracy Bridge 8.8 9.2
8 Make.lurnur. River at New Hope Landing 13.4 14.0
9 Georgiana Slough at Mokelumne River 7.5 7.8
12
5. WM-3YAVEA. General - Wind-wave calculations were made for 12 locations in the Delta. These
locations are shown on Chart 26. Table 7 shows the results of the wind-wave
analysis.
B. Wind Analysis - Wind data from the Stockton Metropolitan Airport was used to
compute the design windspeed. Although Stockton is some distance from some of the
12 locations, it was the closest location for reliable wind data. This analysis found
that high winds can occur from most any direction particularly the North, Northwest
and Southeast,
6. MAXP4UM WATER-SURFACE FLEVATTONS - Maximum water-surface elevations
were developed for the rivers and sloughs in the Delta. The elevations are plotted for the
estimated 1986 water surface, the 50-, 100- and 300-year events. The elevation plots are
shown on Charts 27 through 74.
The 50-, 100-, and 300-year elevation plots represent an estimation of how the 50-, 100-,
and 300-year stages, at the gaged locatigns, translate around the island. These plots should
not be considered as "Profiles" since flmf are derived directly from frequency curves of
recorded maximum annual stages at gaged locations. As was discussed in the section "Flood
Characteristics", on page 3, the annual maximum stages may result from an event that is not
concurrent throughout the Delta. Therefore, the maximum water-surface elevations should
not be considered to be concurrent throughout the Delta. While one area of the Delta is
experiencing maximum elevations, the elevations in other areas will be rising or falling.
Some elevation plots may appear to be "increasing" in the downstream direction.
McCormack-Williarnson Tract, Chart 48, is a good example of this. However, it is
important to remember that all elevations on these Charts are plotted relative to the island.
Charts 75-91, which show island stationing, combined with Table 8, will help determine in
which relative direction the plot was drawn around the island.
The 1986 flood elevations were estimated using recorded gage heights at the respective gage
locations. The 1986 flood elevations reflect levee failures that occured in 1986. The
elevations for the 50-, 100-, and 300-year events were derived using their respective
elevations on the stage-frequency curves. As described in the stage-frequency analysis on
page 4, the stage-fkequency curves reflect a no levee failure situation. Therefore, the,
elevations are so eTe-ia6 n- s.
In almost all cases, the elevation plots were drawn by stmightlining between gaging stations.
However, in areas where no recorded data were available, results from the State of
California's Department of Water Resources Link Node computer model were used to
estimate the water-surface elevation trend. The results of the Link Node model are not
shown in this report. Water-surface profiles shown in the Documentation Report entitled
"Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California" and dated October 1982 were also used to helpin determining the water-surface elevation trends between gaging stations on the major rivers
13
in the Delta. Maximum water-surface elevatons on the Mokelumne River, North and South
Forks of the Mokelumne River and Snodgrass Slough were based on results presented in
Appendix C of the "Draft Environmental Report, Environmental Impact Statement, North
Delta Program" prepared by -the California Department of Water Resources and dated
November 1990. In fringe backwater tributary channels of the Delta, it was assumed that the
elevation in the tributary would be the same as in the major channel where the tributary
connects.
7. LEVEE CRQWN PROM~ES - Levee Crown profiles were plotted from surveys
acquired from each reclamation district. Some profiles show localized high points. These,
points are not indicative of the actual freeboard around the island. The levee stationing base
maps, Charts 76-91, show the stationing along each levee crown for each island. Station
zero on a water-surface profile is not always at the same location as station zero on the base
map, Column 4 of Table 8, pages 16 and 17, lists the station on the base map that
corresponds to station zero on the profile for each island.
The levee crown elevation for McCormack-Williamson Tract is mandated by the State of
California Reclamation Board. This island will be allowed to fail during large flood events as
was the case in 1986.
14
TABLE 7
WIND-WAVE CALCULATIONS
Location Levee
Slope
Wind
Direction
Design
Windspeed
(Inph)
Wind
Duration
Onin)
Design
wave
(ft)
Wind
Set
(f 0
Wave
Runup
(ft)
Water
Depth
(ft)
Fctch
Length
Holland Tract. 1:2 NoTlh 35 45 2.5 V 4,96 15 15,850
Locatioll 1
13 North 35 45 2.5 ~17 3.46 15 15,050
Quimby Tract 1.2 Northwest 29 51 2.1 .13 4.15 15 16,9M
Location 2
1:3 Northweirt 29 51 2.1 .13 2.99 15 16.9w
Webb Tinct 1:2 South 27 so 1.9 .10 3.70 15 i 15,850
Location 3
1:3 South 27 so 1.8 .10 2.56 15 15.950
Webb Trart 1:2 Southew 35 47 2.3 .19 4.57
... .............
is 16,9DO
Location 4
1:3 soulhea9t 35 471
'2.3 .19 330 15 16,9DO
Webb Tfact 1:2 Souihwrxt 23 CYO 1,7 .09 3.32 15 18,500
Location 5
1:3 southwelst 23 60 1.7 .09 2.30 is 18,500
Webb Tract 1:2 West 29 50 2.0 .11 3.99 15 16,150
Location 6
1:3 weat 28 so 2.0 .11 2.70 is 16,150
Bethel I014W IZ2 Nort h 36 42 2.5 .17 4.90 15 14,6DO
Lontion 7
13 North 36 42 2.5 17 3.41 15 1400
BouldinIsland 1:2 Northwest 30 43 2.0 .11 3.84 is 13,500
Location 8
1:3 Northwefft 30 43 10 .11 2.65 15 13,500
Sheramlsknd 1:2 Northwest 30 591
2.1 .17 4.20 15 21,350
Location 9
1:3 Northwest 30 59 2A '17 3.05 is 2L350
lersey Island 1:2 West 27 76 2.1 .19 4.67 is 28.100
IA=60M 10
1;3 West 27 76 2.11
.18 3.94 15 28,100
Twitchell Island 1:2 Southeast 36 39 2A-16 4.71 15 13,SDO
Loca4on 11
1:3 Southeast 36 39 2.4 M 3.26 is 13,5GO
Venice Island 112 WWI 29 22 1,2 .04 2.28 15 5,200
Location 12
L_ ff, -3 wc~st 79 221
1.2 .04 1.50 15 Ei~Ell
TABLE8ZERO STATION MEX
ISLANDNAME
ELEVATTON
CHART
#
INDEX MAPC14ART #('s)
ZERO
STATION
ATLAS 26A 83, 84 110
13ACON 27 82,86 700
BETHEL 28 81, 82 480
BISHOP 29 83,84 150
BOULDIN 30 78,82,83 0
BRACK 31 78, 79 240
BRADFORD 32 81 0
BRANNAN ANDRUS 33 77, 78, 81, 82 560
BYRON 34 86,89 450
CANAL RANCH 35 79 0
CONEY 36 89 210
DEADHORSE 37 78, 79 130
DREXLER 37A 97 350
EMPIRE 38 83 540
FABIAN 39 89,90 530
FAY 40 86 0
HOLLAND 41 82, 86 550
HOTCHKISS 42 81,85,86 380
JONES, LOWER 43 86,87 0
JONES, UPPER 44 86,87 0
KING 45 83 430
LITTLE MANDEVILLE 46 82 230
MANDEVILLE 47 82 730
McCORMACK-WILLIAMSON 48 76,79 0
McDONALD 49 82, 83, 86, 87 700
MEDFORD 50 82,83 0
MILDRED 50A 86 30
NEW HOPE 51 76,79 20
16
TABLE 8
ZERO STATION INDEX
ISLANDNAME
ELEVATIONCHART
INDEX MAP ZEROCHART #(s) STATION
ORWOOD 52 86 0
PALM 53 86 0
PESCADERO 54 90,91 0
PICO NAGLEE 55 89,90 0
QUIMBY 56 82 0
RD 17 56A 88,91 0
RINDGE 57 83,87 sio
RIO BLANCO 58 83 130
ROBERTS, LOWER 59 87,88 0
ROBERTS, MIDDLE 59A 87,88,91 0
ROBERTS, ]UPPER 60 90,91 750
SARGENT-BARNHART 60Ai
88 0
SHERMAN 61 80,81 200
SHIMA 62 83, 84 0
SHIN KEE 63 83 0
STARK 64 90 0
STATEN 6s 78,79, 82 so
STEWART 65A 90,91 110
TERMINOUS 66 78,79,83 127
TWITCHELL 67 81,82 0
TYLER 68 78, 79 30
UNION 69 87,89,90 210
VEALE 69A $5, 86 70
VENICE 70 82 630
VICTORIA 71 86,87,89 790
WALNUT GROVE 71A 78,79 10
WEBB 72 81, 82 0
WOODWARD 73 86 0
WRIGHT-ELMWOOD1
741
83, 84,87,88 0
17
TABLE 9
LEVEE CROA" SURVEY DATES
ISLAND SURVEYDATE
ISLAND SURVEYDATE
ATLAS AUG 1979 PALM JUNE 1991
BACON YUNE 1991 PESCADERO SEPT 1987
BETHEL AUG 1991 PICO NAGLEE JUNE 1987
BfSH op AUG 1989 QUIMBY APR 1990
BOULDIN JULY 1991 RD 17
BRACK OCT 1988 RINDGE JULY 1990
BRADFORD AUG 1987 RIO BLANCO MAY 89,
JULY 91
BRANNAN ANDRUS JUNE 1989 ROBERTS, LOWER FEB 1987
BYRON JUNE 1991 ROBERTS, MIDDLE --
\CANAL RANCH JUNE 1991 ROBERTS,UPPER FEB 1987
CONEY JUNE 1990 SARGENT BARNHART
DEADHORSE OCT 1988 SHERMAN JULY 1990
DREXLER SHIMA MAR 1990
EMPIRE JULY 1989 SHIN KEE JUNE 1979
FABIAN JULY 1987 STARK JUNE 1987
FAY MAR 1990 STATEN MAR 1990
HOLLAND JULY 1990 STEWART
HOTCHKISS NOV 1990 TERMINOUS JUNE 1987
JONES, LOWER OCT 1990 TWITCHELL V AUG 1999
JONES,UPPER 1986 TYLER SEPT 1986
K.ING JULY 1999 UNION JUL, NOV1991
LITTLE MANDEVILLE OCT 1987 VEALE
MANDEVILLE DEC 1990 VENICE AUG 1985
McCORMACK-WILLIAMSON AUG 1989 VICTORIA APR 1990
McDONALD AUG 1991 WALNUT GROVE
MEDFORD APR 1991 WEBB SEPT 1989
MILDRED - WOODWARD 1990
NEW HOPE APR 1990 WRIGHT-ELMWOOD JUNE 1991
ORWOOD JUNE 1997_
18
LIS
T
OF
CA
GE
S
Saczacunto
Riv
or
at
Collin
svillo
-.U
L.
Ri-
at
Thr-
RIA
.S
lough
s.c
r-.n
t.
at
Ri.
Vi.t.
a
c-
nt,
at
wain
t
rrovo
cr..
:
Lt.
~111
c
at
llnodqra
~&
am
p;
Slo
ugh
v
4
SA
cr
~
ato
Rl"
'
at
",
31
...
I
H.k
.l-.
Ri-r
at
a..
..P
.D
ri...
r
..
91n,
51m
g,
at
U..
J.
god.
R.L
r
at
Ati.r
h
s--
z--qain
Hi,.r
z
Thr-
-811~
fil..g
h
5-
J-qul,
Hi-
at
B-
Andr...
~ndjn
g
Sao
P.1
-
at
V-1..
I.I.
nd
s
n".
~-"
3*,q
",
HI-
:1
X.,
Joaquin
RL-r
t
U
-
~U
toff
.9
Jc.q
u4~
ki-r
t
Bra
ndt
orid
g.
Han
JO
Aq.i.
RA.
.1
at
old
R
.1
Rock
Slo
ugh
Old
Riv
or
It
By-
Tra
ct
Old
Ai-
at
clift-
court
Old
"V
.r
at
Tr-cy
Gia
nt
Lin
,C
*nm
l
at
Tra
cy
Bridga
Mid
01.
AL-r
It
D..
..X
.1..d
'Iddil
Ri~
tB
d..
Hig
h
y
Hid
dle
Riv
er
zt
Koury
Drid9o
""'
)~
-4.1
-1
-.
J14
ifl'
I-
X
L"P
)
%
A
TA
"T
PIT
IBB
UR
O
HAY
".-
N
Pu4pik
aIL
AN
T
P".
""
SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREACORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
o
z: f
4~i 4 3
7-
6-
.. .... ....
Mr
L 1 1 Z
4-. . . .....
3- ... .... ...
1 L
2- ....... ..... ... ...
-7-7
0in 5~n so 100 2W 500
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1945--1988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWN
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESACRAMENTO RIVER AT
COLLINSVILLE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared'. J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
so
Date: February 1992
CHART2
Exceedence frequency per 100 Years
I
1
70 Go 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
D-
7-
1H
. . . . . . . . . .
3 iI
L 1
on FA 1 M 2W 5W I 0j
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1945-1974
MISSING DATA 1970-1972
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTING POSITIONS REPRESENT 44 YEARS
OF DATAPLOTTING PO$ITIONS BASED ON RECORD EXTENDED BY
CORRELATION NTH RIO VISTA AND COLLINSVILLE
so
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
SACRAMENTO RIVER ATTHREE MILE SLOUGH
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.Date: February I M
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
11
10-
9
6
1
4-
2
" W W 40 W 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
........ . .
LAI
j
Ni
7 v
i 3 1 1
. . .. .
.. .
I.
a 10 20 60 100 200 6W 1
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
SEE PAGE a IN I EX I FOR A DISCUSSION OF
THIS CURVE
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESACRAMENTO RIVER AT
RIO VISTANEW LOCATION AT HIGHWAY 12 BRIDGE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.FL
Drawn: J.K
80
Date: February 1992
CHART 4
EXceedence, frequency per 100 years
I
1
I
I
1
1
M ao W 40 W 20 10 5 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
it:
7-
. . . . . . ; 4~ 44~-
5-
4-it
3-
t t
it i
it
4
F-TFm6
~
f t ft
it x it
7
. . . . . . .. . .
i iA
t
itt: itti itit .: : i
it itit it
i
it
4
itit
ILUit it
i
it
it
... .... ...
2- it it t i
4~ . .... .... ....
i~01
.1 n in An 1 ryl 9 S 1m
I
I
I
I
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1945-1988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCYNOTSHOWN
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESACRAMENTO RIVER AT
WALNUT GROVE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
90
Date: February 1 MCHART 5
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 52...
I aS a2 0.1--i is i
-
is is
1! is 1 1 ::Ist:!; is
j:: 1is i:: t i .. .... Z:
28- is's I t ....
4 b
27- .
25- it:is
it s
24-:Is!
23- ... .... .. .... is:: t i
22-t I I
it
4is. ts 7
20-i it t
is:1 4
st
19 it 1. 77; is I ;;it 3i
its s: r:::4~
is E:JC-1 V
17- IsQ) Mi 1 L 1 -i
6--Ywi
T i F
15L rtTT
is: 4 it is
14-is
-4~is is
13 i
1
llH-
12-Ile
CL io-s i
t-
is
7- .... ...is
r ::is 4 W.... .... .... .. ....
i: zi
4- to
H. is
3
21
... .... ....
I iLL
5 10 20 so 100 2w 500 1
Exceedence interval in years
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTANOTES-
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGESSTAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 194-5-1988 SACRAMENTO RIVER ATMISSING DATA 1957
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY SNODGRASSSLOUGHNOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 43 YEARS OF DATA CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drmn. J.H.Date: February 1 M
I
CHART 6
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
95 W so 70 6o 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 a2 0.1
i i N d I
39
t 3 1 1 L
37- m t
36-
35
34:1 fl I I I
33-
32
'i V
29
... . ... ...
251 4
22-
20:. . . ...
..
::[t t
7-TT
IS
6 .
...t L r i
:4-
3. .... .... .
2-
0:
9 .... .... ....
Sit! 1 1
7
i :31:
4
2- if i i
t:i
0
V 4W ovivu ga" owl
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
DI nT7=M DnPKITC~ A= AKIKI"Al D=ALe 0YA.-MCO
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLYSTAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
PERIOD OF RECORD 1.945--1988 SACRAMENTO RIVER ATMISSING DATA 1977,1976
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY ]-STREETNOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 42 YEARS OF DATA CORPS OF ENGINEERS. SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
SHAPE OF CURVE ABOVE THE 63-YEAR FREQUENCY Prepared: J.H.
13EFLECTS LOSS OF CONTROL AT FOLSOM DAMI
Drawn: J.H. Date, February I MCHART 7
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
I
I
I
I
M W W 0 W 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0
-rTTT 7~
7- Miz
it Ii
I t I it I
iI i
tt ;
j!;!
5- -F-T-77- I ii it
it;
it: 1
i it: I
4-i
itI it
i t
3-it
it
i! i L
2-t
'ti
It 1: 1
JV
t
it I I: i I
t ILL 1.
It .. ... It it I
0-4: It
: i it I 1 1 1
1
7-
it I!
1 3 1 1 it it
t1 l:I I it 1:
4-
L 1 L 1 It I
3-1 1
I: I: it I t It
t
iti
'
ttit; 1 1H j i
on
I
1
I
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1940-1988
MISSING DATA 1964,1961, 1 M, 1947,1 $41
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCYNOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 45 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
S.F. MOKELUMNE RIVER ATNEW HOPE LANDING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn, J.H.
90
Date: February 1992
CHART 8
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
70 go 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 I ab a2 0,11
0
. . . . . . . . . . . .
t i i t t i j
7
N.D zf:
4-
;;sti
3- -
1 3
LL0
i n gn so 100 2m 59W 10
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES-
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1945-1988
MISSING DATA I M AND 1966-1973
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 35 YEARS
OF DATA
90
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEGEORGIANA SLOUGH AT
MOKELUMNE RIVER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.Date: February I M
CHART9
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
1
%e
WW
13-
" W W 0 W 20 10 5 1 0.5 0.2 0A
o
-4~
i t i 1
7-
4 i i L
ff I
:
Y4-
... Hit i
i i 3
:
4
iit i
1 z itt S
H4;1
it;
0Al i n 500 1
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1946-1988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWN
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
ANTIOCH
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared-. J.H.
Drawn: J. H.
so
Date. February 1 MCHART 10
E..xceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 al
0
i i iTrm
jj!j
8-
7- i3'
T.I
.. . . . . . .
. . .
i
,
T
4 -W
9 P m
3-
2- -rr!T -T~
01
I A on I m 2W 5W 10
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES-PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 19454988
MISSING DATA 1973,1956,1954,1953
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 40 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER ATTHREE MILE SLOUGH
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
QA
Date: February I MCHART 11
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
W0)
te
go 70 go 50 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0. 5 0.2 0.1
is
1: is
0-s
i 1: sic c
1!;: sic s c'
M
4-
i
s
i
I
is
HH I i
I ii Ni s i i i i 1
?
c's i s::Ni c.:; i
c;: :cs isi
3rt-
1-Kc:: I
!is: i:;! g:.!4-
so ii
is
isi:sc
i
I
i i 11 s:: 1
t
Is: 11:1 1s:::
is;;:: : :
1 1 ic::is z;
i !:: .
I
::::i
.... .... ...
c c
3
i i
i L
c I
F
i t i
.1 in I no 90A 5W 10Isis
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 19W1 988
MISSING DATA 1960
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 30 YEARS OF DATA
Exceedence interval in years
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
SAN ANDREAS LANDING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.Date: February I M
, CHART 12
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
" W W 40 W 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
TI:
.
D-
j 111 I- -
7-
xi i. . . . . . . . . . A b;r
. . .. ..... .
5-
Y1 A ;
. . . ...
:t! 1 L 1 1 1
. .. ...
3-
j I I I I
2-
0-
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1$0,-l 988
MISSING DATA 1952
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 43 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
VENICE ISLAND
CORPS OF ENGINEER$, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared* J.H,
Drawn: J.H.
so
Date: February 1992
CHART 13
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
1
M M W 40 W 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0 . ........
.
-
7- X '!
-7-77T
x
77TT
itit
4-
i i L t
i
z Lt
3-
2- -TTT~
Fn 100 20D 5W 1 0~
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES-
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAKS
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1945-1988
MISSING DATA 1953
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 43 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
RINDGE PUMP
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
90
Date: February 1992
CHART 14
E.'xceedence frequency per 100 years
I
W 40 W 20 10 5 2 1 0.n 5 0.2 0.1090 so
W: ... ...
0-
. . . . . .. . .. . .
i i
7-
it i t:! i t
it
Az 3 i i i i
. .. . . . . .
. ..
4-
t I
3-it
it
2-
Hit
f
0
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1959-1988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCYNOTSHOWN
Exceedence interval in years
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVE
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
BURNS CUTOFF
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.Date: February 1992
CHART 15
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
2
2
2
I
I
1
70 so 60 40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
i
1
i
~i i lij LLL ~4- i -4-3- -
m
9- m
N
7-
jai L
4-i f
-4~L L
2-
8
7-
4-
2-
1Y- a v
i
n DA gn I no 2m sm loc
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1958-19n
MISSING DATA 1978,1977,1967
POINTS BEYOND 96% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 26 YEARS OF DATA
CURVE BASED ON UPDATED FLOW-FREQUENCYCURVE FOR SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT VERNALIS
90
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
BRANDT BRIDGE
CQRP$ OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.Date: February 1992
CHART 16
E%rr. eAce dence frequency per 100 years
" m W 40 W 20 10 1 0.6 0.2 0.1
34- ... ....
1
r z z 1
!7-
a6-
?4-
-3
?2. ..... ...
Set,
7-
V,4
X,
4 4-
.
...... .....
7-
j t
3
4 ~x T-
3 -FT7 -7-... .... ...
2-
ri-rl-
0
3
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD I M-1 964
POINTS BEYOND 96% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNCURVE BASED ON UPDATED FLOW-FREQUENCY CURVE
FOR SAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT VERNALIS
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVESAN JOAQUIN RIVER AT
MOSSDALE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared; J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
90
Date: February 1992
CHART 17
lExceedence frequency per 100 years
1
I
30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0- 4~ 4
i
i
s:
4i:mi7
is Is
is is
S Z L
7-
is
s is t
is... is
His is . ... ... ... ...
is
is
zi:4
is is
4- mom m m ... .... isis is i
is t;sz: is is i
1x;
<
s
.
I
. . . .
is
iiis
:3j
3-
is; is i
I is.is
Z~11
is3 1
I n !In Ina non sm 161
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES-PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1946-1984
MISSING DATA 1 M, 1951
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 37 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE-FREQUENCY CURVEOLD RIVER ATROCKSLOUGH
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
so
Date: February I MCHART 18,
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
C:
-0~
20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
......
0
t L
1 L 1
:d I j d
7-
x
i L
5-
44- .
3-
i N.
2-
0-1
I n no SA I an 2w
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1965-1988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWN
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEOLD RIVER AT
BYRON TRACT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared; J.H.
Dram: J.H.
Qn
Date: February 1992
CHART 19
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I
1
0 m 50 40 30 20 10 6 1 0,5 02 0.1
i i t
0
t 4
8-
7-t t t:
... .... ... ALA
3
-
2- o -i t
.... .... ....
0sn 1 on
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1958-1 ONMISSING DATA 1971
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 30 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEOLD RIVER AT
CLIFTON COURT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
so
Date: February 1992
I CHART 20
'L:-~:-Ceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
0-
it
9- j6ii i id i :z::
't4~
it t:z
::it 1 1 t
7- iit
x.
1 itit
t
X
4....
it:
3-
j
1
:tj::.;
2-
i J ii
0t5n ZtA I on 2W SM
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD I SWI 988
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWN
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEOLD RIVER ATTRACY BRIDGE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared- J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
an
Date: February 1 MCHART 21
.E.xceedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
(D
0)
0-
20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
Tom m
0-
44-
Lit ~:j; i t
it
it
iti it
it: it
7-t: i i
:it
t:::
lit
it
it:
itlt
t
i W.
4-
3
. .. . . .
2-
..... .... ....
Hil l:
!"l :it
gn ,n i nn gmExceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1958-1985
MISSING DATA 1068, 1967
POINT$ BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCYNOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 26 YEARS OF DATA
r-
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEGRANT LINE CANAL ATTRACY ROAD BRIDGE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CAIJFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
so
Date: February 1992
CHART 22
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
a)
(D
CL
20 10 5 2 1 0.5 a2 al
07 ;7;
it i
t
9-
t
j
7-2tz, 1
titit: 4
t4 HI
;:gc i::t
z:il
t
:t;'.
ti
4-4 tit
... ....
A::t !tit
it
:tit t
3
:4:tit
.
... .... ...
2- itit tt;; i
. .
.... . ....
0so 100 2W sm
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1958-1988
MISSING DATA 1968,1967
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 29 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEMIDDLE RIVER AT
BACON ISLAND
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALJFORN[A.
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
an
Date: February I MCHART 23
Exceedence frequency per 100 years
I I
10
I
8-
8-
3-
o m W 0 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
i Hill 11
fL t i
i I
;H:
6
5
4-
5 10 20 so 100 m 6m I
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PEF310D OF RECORD I S45-1 MMISSING DATA 1973.1958
POINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREQUENCY
NOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 42 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEMIDDLE RIVER ATBORDEN HIGHWAY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared: J.H.
Drawn*. J.H.Date: February 1992
80
CHART 24
ExCeedence frequency per 100 years
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
40 30 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
7-
6 J
5-
4 --T4444-
3. . . . . .
2- A:
/r
0
8 A. +4:A,
7- T
t: p.
5
4 m 7 Z
3- _M44- -1 H-4- -1 1--t L
2Nr
4
-4
... Mii ii
f
0 jI n !M rA 100 2W sm I
I
Exceedence interval in years
NOTES:
PLOTTED POINTS ARE ANNUAL PEAK STAGES
CURVE PLOTTED GRAPHICALLY
PERIOD OF RECORD 1 SW1 988
MISSING DATA 1968,1967, 1 WPOINTS BEYOND 95% EXCEEDENCE FREOUENCYNOTSHOWNPLOTTED POINTS REPRESENT 28 YEARS OF DATA
SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
STAGE FREQUENCY CURVEMIDDLE RIVER ATMOWRY BRIDGE
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared. J.H.
Drawn: J.H.
an
Date: Febnjary 1992
CHART 25
:G..w.ll
Hoy",~in
T 0 !A.
P-P'%
WAVE RUNUP LOCATIONS
AND
FETCH DIAGRAM,
CORPSOFENGINEERS.SACRAMENTO, CALJFORNIA
r a pared ;J.H.
SHEET 1 OF 2 CHART 26
WAVE RUNUP LOCATIONS
AND
FETCH DIAGRAM
I
Muller
Slough
Atlas Trart Lpveo 1
WD-Year Elev
100-Year Ele%
=6 Estimalpd l n-YpAr
Elevations
Tvations
- - - - -T F r T-T-T-7
3
I
io
roLn
Mons
allorts
NOTE;
The 50--, IM-, and 300~par u4ter~flacf elevatmi plai5 are not
pro~ilesi they are derived from frequency curves of recorded anwalmaxi" slai4es at wed locauons. The stages re~jlt lroE sioras of
different orIgins uhich do not have the samw frequenctf at all localtens,
and from lides of varying marpitudes that seldoz reach their saxieLm
stages concurrentIq Q11h the peak f1m. See expl mation in text 1h
swiw, 'HaxswA kaler-$urioce Elevatlon?~ The 1984 plot is a connection
of bighualer marks and gaged recordings and represents the maximim stages
of that flood.
20
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSRNDS OF FEET SACPRa70-SM JMCUIN DEL7A
LRECLAMATION DISTRICT 2021
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEWIONSATLAS TPACT
COPS Or ENMMS, SAMIENM UUMNIAFEMMY IM
CHART 26A SHEET I OF 1
t%ddle Pive ivor
11-fril. 01- t P-ri 1.7-1Old Piver at Pock SloL
Gaging Slatio
gh
ATag 0411roa d Saging Station
Baran Island Levee Cr un
AL
. . ... .... ....
1986 Estmaled Elevations 50-Year Elevations
17
-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevations
0i I I I i I
10
I I
NaTE:
Tht 5D-, 120-, and 300-year vater-surface elevation plot5 are not
pro files: they:rp
derived frox 1r9cfuency ~ryes of recorded ~ala ax i MM 5 1
ages t gaged Jccal:ciis. The stages result from storms of
different arigins uhich do not have the same frequency at all localiarsi
and from 13des of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maxi"stages conourrenilij with the peak 410US. See eXplamatlOn Irl 1011. in
section,4axizux ilaier-Surface Elevations% The 1906 plot is a connection
o:hightfaler marks and gaged recordings and represents the saximm stages
o that floDd.
I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ i I I j I I I I I I I I I 11
1 1 ~ I I I I I I ~ II I t 1
20 30 io 50
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLANATION DISTPICT 206~
60
SACPArMO-SM JGPMIN MiTA
MAXINUM OTEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONSBACON ISLAND
ops cr FNENEMS, SACOMENTG CALirmNiA
rEMAPY 1992
CHAPT 27 SHEET I CF 2
16
15
14
13
Nalt.
The5&,, IDD-, " 300-Vear ualpr-surlace OleVallon plats are not
profiles; they are derived from frequeocy curves of recorded annual
maxim.m stages at gaged locations. Thestages
result from storw of
different origins uhich do not have the same freqjenct; at all locations,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maxin~
:tagescorcurrernlV uiih The peak flows~ See
explanalicnainit exIcIneclion,
'Maximum IJator-Surlaco EleYallcri?. The 1986 PI t s a onneclIon
of highwater marks and i;aged recordings and represents the maximum stages
11 1w N apd.
30-Year Elevalions
100-Year Elevations
5
i
3
21
1 1 1 1 1 1 -T-T- ,1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
60 70 80
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMRTION DISTRICT 2068
W*rzh1rO-SM JVWh MTA
MMINUM ~~TEP SUPFACE ELDATIONSBACON ISLAND
COPPS OF ENEIKEEPS, SftMArENTG CMFW1AFEBRUARY 1992
CHART 27 SHEET 2 OF 2
16-
TauiDr Slcuqh PipLr SI.ogiih RA15-
I o.ugh Slough
13-
J 12-
Bel el Island Levee Crown
WA
z0 B
Lij
6-
1986 Estimate
I
d Elevalior s
M-Year Elevation!M-Year Elevations
300-Year Elevations
3
2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
N01E:LEOEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SACWnffo-sm nfiWIN DELTA
The M-~ loo-o and no~par uaier-surfaco oleyali~ plais are nol
profile , 1 they are derived from lrpquercy ctIrves ' i recorded annual NAXINUM OTEP SUPFACF ELEUATIONSI ax I OLM S I ages a t gaged locations. The stages result 1rC2 stores Of
different origins uhich do not have The saw frequvrx:y at all loca,Irns, BETHEL I SLfiNDand from lides of
varying mapiludes that seldom rpath their itaxisum
Stages concurrently uith thepe
k flous. See explanation In text in cmn or wiNEEps, SACPWIENTO rXIFOWIPam
secliono 'Maximum Waler-Surfact Elevallcns;'. The 1%6 plol is a C"rtectlon F03RMIZY 19132
of hLgWaler marks and gaged recordings and represents the AaXLMUN stages
of that flood. CHAPT 28 SHEET I OF I
Pi xlotj Dis )pqirilinent !ItoSlough 31ough Cut Cut
Bishop Tract Lev De Crwn
301
A
50-Year Eievaticn st986 Esl
C 3
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
II I I -i I I I I I I
I II
10 20I
SACRMEMM-SM JYMIN DETA
MAXIMUN ~ATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSPECLANAT:CN DISTPICT 2012
BISHOP TWTURPS OF MINEAG, SACPAnElfrO MAMMA
FURLMY 19S2
CHAPT 29 SHEET I CF I
NOR.,
Tf* 50--, 100-, and 3W-year water-surfa,ce elevation plots are not
profiles-. 1hey are derived from 4reqjerx:q curves of reorded armalMaXI KM stages at gaged locations. The stages result from storms of
a I f feren t orig I ns aich cb not have the s,-oe freq*ncy at all locations,
and Irm lides of varying mWllu*s that seldoe reach their saximm
stages concurrwlq Llith the peak flous. See explanation in text in
seciiui,91aximum waier-Surface Eleyations'. The 1966 plot is a connection
of h3glwater marks aid gaged reurdin~s and represents the maxir-th stages
of that foo L
-Year Elevations
.--. levatlon5
40
441
II OR 00 'Ain Mrugb Potalo Slough oz--l
-Mokelumne
j4lacrmnPiver
2ver16-1
14-
-
13
12-
11
zA0 Bouldin 1sland Levee Cr
im
------------
7-- --------- --------------------
5- -1986 Esumaled Elevatio
-Yeaf Elewdila 5 lu e- --i0mr
l- l 300-Year Elevalions
4 - - -1 1 1 1 j
iI I I I I I I I ~ I I t I t I I I 1
T T1 I I I I I i I i i I I 1
11 1 1 j I I ~ I i
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOTE: LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET Wr*~O-SW JMIN DEL7A
The W-, 100-, and 301~-year uater~Hace elevation plats are not
profiles; they are derived from frecpency curyts at recorded annual MAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSmax," SjaQeS .1 gaged localiem, The Stages result from slorms of PECLAMATION DISTPICT 756different origirs uhich ft not have the same Irequenq at all locations, BOULDIN ISLANDand lr~m lides of varying magnitudes, that seldm reach their taxiv=stag,5 con"rrenliq uith the peak flows. See explanation. in text 2n CORPS OF ENOINEEPS, 110MKWO CALIFCANIA
section, JMaxiw-m Uater-Surface Elevaisons'. The 1996 plot is a connection FEBRUAVY 1992
of highwaler marks and gaged recordings and ropresenis %he maxiNum stagesof that 4loM. CHAPT 30 SHEET I OF 2
Mokelumnii
_F~F. Mokelumne Piv er at
beargiarta Slough i4ge
Bouldin Islan6 L evee Crown
V V
------------ 20
lu
19S6 Estimated Elevations50-lear Flevanc rts
-
60I i 111111ill 1111~111i 11
70 80 so
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 756
I
NOTEi
The BID-, 100-, and 300-gear ualer-surfacr eleyalionplats are not
prolilesl they are derived from IrequGncy curves ol recorded annual
mall" stages at gaged locations. The stages result Irm storms of
dillvr~t origins which do not have the saae frequxncy at all locations,
and 4roa lides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages conctirrenlIq uith the peak 11cws. See explanation in text in
section, 'Maxialm ~Ialer-Surlate Elevation?. The ISG6 plot is a connection
0 higWater marks and gaged recordings andrepresents
the maximum 5tagesol that flood.
-Year Elevations
-Year Elevations
j7
100
SAMMENTO-SAN JDAMIN DELTA
NAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSBOULDIN ISLAND
CORPS OF ENGINEEQS, SACPAttEWG CALIFORKIA
FEBRUARY IM
CHART 30 SHEET 2 OF 2
16-1
15Plog Slough S.F. Mokolumne Syram ore Slough
River
13
J 12---
L4 Elevations
0 A
D
-6
- -d ElevJ1966 Estimate ilons 5
1-Year
Elevations 100-Year Elevaii ins
4-
3-
j2
10 20 30 410 60
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET 5ACORWO-SM JOMIN BUJA
The 60-, IM-, and 2GO-War waler-msrtace elevation plots are not
prMilesi they are derived from frequency curves of recor&-d annual MAXIMUN WRTEP SUPFKE ELEUATIONSmax "um 5 lageS at qZged locations. The stages result from staras of PECLAMATION OISTPICT 2033different origins which do not have the same freq-*ncy at all locations, BPACK TPACTand from licks ol
varying siagnilutits that seldom reach their maxi~Stages concurrerilly with the peak 11~. See explanation in text m CORPS CF ENGINEMS, MMVEN7a CA~JFBRNJA
section, 'llaximum 4aler-Surface ElevationO. The 1986 plot is a conneclion FERM 1992of hzqhualor marks and gaged recordings and
representsthe maximumi stages
of lha t Hood. CHAPT 31 SHEET I OF I
San Joa uin River False River
cut
San
ThreE
Joaquin Pivor at
Mile Slough Gage
Bradford Isl and Levee Crown
A ~ AV V
IS86 Estitoaled Elevallor s
50-Year Flevationif
0
i I I I i"
I I I I I ~ I I I i I I I I I ~ I I I I ~ t
to 20 30
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
I I
NOTEi
The EG-, 101-, and 300-year uaior-sur4aca elevation plats are not
pro4tles; they are derived from freq-wici; curves of recorded aw"Imaximiz stages at gaged locaiians. The stages result free starts of
different origins uhLch do not have the same ;requency at all localidhs~
and from lides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their %axiwat
stages concurrently uith the peak flows. Sep explanation in text in
seclion,'liaxiz= Water-Surface Elevations'. The 1986 plot is a connection
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxiam stages
of that flood,
200-Year Elevatioo~
100-Year Elevations
40
SAMYWO-SAN JOAQUIN DM7.~
PECLAMATION DISTRICT 2059MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONS
BPADFOPD ISLAND
CMPS F ENENERS, ShCAMMU CALIFORNIA
FMMAqY ISS2
CHAPT 32 SHEET I OF I
32
30
28
26
-J 21co
22
20L
1B
0 16
6
0
4!
Sarranento Piver
Sacramen
l
ic Piver at Pio Vista
aging Station
Brannan Andrtz Island Levee Crow
..................
300-Yvar Elevations
1986 Estimated Elevations 50-Year Elevalicns100-YL.)r Elovations
i I
10
I
NOTE:
The 50-, ICO-, and 300~par water-suHacu elevation plots are not
:r
liles; thpu are derived irm fri-qjeneq ourvesof,recarcLed
armal
"'Irium stages at gaged locaiions. The stages rpsul free storm at
diflerentorigins which do not have the saiae Ireqxncy at all locau"i
and froN tides of varying rognitudes that seldom reach their aaximuz
stages concurrently 4iih he peak llows. See explanation in text in
S,ecllcn, ~Haximx Waler-~urlacp Elpyalionst. The 1586 plot is a connection
of hi 1huaier toarts iind 4aged recordings " represents the taxiKut stagesof that I I aud~
I II
II I
20 30 ~O
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
I I 1
501 1 l
f I I I I
SAMWENTO-ShN inAgUIN DEL7h
60
MAXIMUM W~TEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSBPANNAN ANOPUS ISLAND
=3~ OF ENSWEERS, SAMAMENIO CRLWORWFMPUM ISR2
CHART 32 SHEETI OF 4
32
30
29
26
-j 21
22
20
z, 18
I - I - I
Sacrameni o Aiver Georglaria Slough
Sar ramento River at Walnut G
Gaging Slalirtri
~Dve
I
Brannan Andrus Island Levee Crown
A
ed Elv~diium
50-Year ElevationsM-Year ElevationE
nD 1-YQar Elevations
L- - - - - -- -
60I I I
NOTE,
The !50-, 100-, and 300-year ualpr-surlace elevalion, plats are not
pro4iles: they are derived Iror freqAncy curves 0 recorded armal
n II
f:MStZgPS at gaged locations. The sl2ges rvsull from star~ of
dif rent origins uhich do no% have he saa~e frequency at all l0tatl",and from fides of varying maqnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrently ulth the peak flovs~ See explanation in text in
section, 'MaxlrLm Aaler-Surlace ElevaiiDrre, The IS86 plot is a connecitcri
highuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxian stages
that flood.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I F F F F F 1 I I I I I I I I
M 90 100 110 120
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SACMUM-SM SOAXIN MITA
MAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELMTIONSBPANNAN ANDPUS ISLAND
CUPS OF ENSINEERS, GAMAMENTO M-MANIAFMIRRY 142
CHART 33 SHEET 2 OF 4
Spergiana Slough lokelumne Piver San joaquin i iver
hilL
Slough
S.F flablumne Aiver at Geor
Slough Gaging Station
iana San Joaquin Piver
Andreas Landing Sag
at San
nq Stzlion
.... . .. .... ...
Brannan A idrus Island Levve Croun
A-,
1996 Estimated Eleval ons
qn-Y... 100-Year ElLvations
J2c
..
a-year Elevations
120I
13C
I
NCTF:
The 53-, ]CO-, and 300-tpar uater-surface elevation plots are not
profiles; they are derived from frequency ~rvps 411 remrded annual
tu i
:umstages at gaged IDcalians. Thu stages result Irm storms of
diff rent crigins which do not have The sme freqjencq at aLI locations,
and fro. %ides of varying sagnitudes that seldot reach ihev maxitum
stages cmcurreritly with the peak flows. See explanation in text in
sectim, 'ftaxz" Waier-Surface Elevallorts'. The 19?6 plot is a conneclicn
c( highuater zarks and gaged recordings and represents the ma~i" stages
0 that flco&
FT t 1 ! I
lio 150 160
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
180
SACRAftENTO-SM XAMIN ELIA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELLUATIONSBRANNAN ANOPUS ISLAND
COPPS OF ENGINEERS, SAaMFNTO CALIFORNIA
FEMAPY 19S2
CHAPT 33 SHEET 3 OF i
28
26
21
22-
20
is
16
12
10
S
6
2-
0
Seven Mile Sli
Cr )ss
Lc
EleN
Unav~
vee
alifin
Oable
Brannan An:Jru5 Island Lev ~e Croun,
300-Ypar Ei evations
lua-Year TTPvati
Elevations
5D-' ear Elevation5
ii
ISOI I I I I I i
I
ISO 200
LEUEE STATIONING IN T HOUSMOS CF FEETI
I
NOTE -
The 50-, 160-, and 3W-i4ear waier-suHace elevaun plots are not
profilosi thN ate derived from irequp=j curves 41 recorded amuelmaximum stages at gaged locations. The stages rpsvlt irew storms of
di~ferm% origins which do not have the swre ~requen-q at all lacaticrs,
and fro ittles of varging magnitudes that seldox reach their mbxltiu~
stages concurrently with the peak ~law5. See explanation in text in
SeCtLOn, '11aximur Waie~-Surface Elsvations~'. The ISH plot is a c~clionof highuaier marks and ga;ed recordings and represents the maximum stages
of that flood.
ns
SACPMENTO-SM JCAGUI~i OE1.7A
210
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIGNIS
BPANNAN MDPUS ISLMD
ODWS OF ENGINEEPS, SAUAIENTO C.ALIFDAN16
MRARY 1992
CHnPT 33 SHEET 4 OF 4
4
J -IN
Old River 11.1i.n S lough
Indian Slough -F
Old Piver at Byron Tra
Saging Station
I
A A
V V
Byron Trac Levto Crown
MO- Year Elevations
'O-Year E
1
Ievat:ons
~1986
rslimated Elevations
I
T0
II I
I I II I I I
~I I I
10 20 30
7h~e ~~, IM-, and 3W-ryear ualor-surlace elevation plots are not
LEVEE STATICNING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
prolilesi theq are derived from frequency curves of recorded wwwala ax, -S a, p ed location5. The stages rmlt iron storms of
,I ':ums,1
9
at
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800f rinil orig ns; Qh I ch 11 no have The Sam lreqjmq at all locallonsj
and irpa tides ofvarying magnitudes
]hot seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrently with lh~e peak flows, See Elxplanallon in text In
section, 'JlaxiKn Uaier-Surfacp Eley2iions. The 1986 plot is a cohneriLon
athighuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxivum stages
of ffiat flood,
40
100-Year Elevations
50
StXa%'MD-,W MAGUM U&M
NAXIMUM WATEP SUPFnCE ELEOTIONSBYRON TRACT
COWS W USPOW, SRCWIWD CALlyDPRIA
Mpufo IM
CHART 34 SHEET 1 OF I
16
15
14
13
12
I I
10
0
2-
-I - -1 -10 id
Beaver Slough 7 S.F. Mokeluarte River Hog Slough East Levee
Canal Panch Trai t Levee CroLm
V
3OD-Year Eleva I i ons44
A,
50-Year Elevalic)n5
100-Year Elevations
I I I
10
I I I
NM:The M-, 100-, and MD-~War uater-surfam elevation plots are not
profiles. they art derived It" frequenN curves of t'Lcorded annual
aaxl%Lm Slaqe$ at gaged locations. The stages result froa slow cl
d0forKIarig ins which tin not have the same frequencq at all locations,
and from lides ofvar-4ing magnitudes that seldom reach their maxi"
.stages concurremly with the peak 11ous. Set explanation in text in
section, 'Maximum Water-GurlacR ElpvaticnO. nw 1996 plot is a connection
o~
highwater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maXI" St&QeS
o that flood.
I II I I I
I
20
LEUEE STATIONING
30 io
IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLRMATION DISTRICT 2086
I i I II
I I ~ I I I i I i'
50 60
SAMVeM-W JOAQUIN DULTA
NAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELENTIONSCANAL RANCH TRACT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SRMLA"O MIFORNIATEMM IBM
CHART 35 SHEET 1 OF I
Did Pi rer West Canal
F-111dRiver al Cliitcn CoQrl Sage
A F,
Cor*y Isl and Levee roun
AL
EO-Year Elevali m
Estimaud Elevallor s
0
II
i ii
20I I
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
I
30
Nm:The M-, 100-, and 2DG-War water-surlaw elevation plots are not
profiles: they are detived frn Imquenct; curves of recorded avmlsaximm stages at gaged locations, 7h* stages result 4rot storks of
different OrIgIM which do not have the sate friqjpncq at all locallon5i
and froii lides ol varqlhg magnitudes that seldim eeach their maxmnstages ra=rremly with the peak ilous. Eff expZw*taon in text in
sectionpRMaximm Walar-Surfam Elovatmns'. The 1996 plot is a c=*ctian
of hLgWater marks md gaged recordings wd represents the saxiaLm stages
al that 4100CL
30&-Yoor Klpvalicm
100-year Flovatiom
SACRAM(TMM JDARUIN M17A
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2117MAXIMUN MTEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONS
CONEY ISLAND
CDPPS T ENGINEMS, SFOA~MD C&IFORMIM
TOMMY 1992
CHAPT 26 SHEET I OF I
22
21
20
19
LW 16
z15
z0 14
13
W-j
12W
I I
10
9
8
N. F. nPari Sn )dorass
hokelu.%r* Horse E
RiverCut
lough
Dead Horse 2sland LvveG Crown
50-Ye
1986 Estimated Elevations
0 10
NMTr* 50-, 100-, aid M-gear uaier-surfat* eleybnon plxli; are riot
profilts, 1he4 are derived froa frequency virves of recoeded uvtual
jaxi" staW at qagod locations. The stages result from siankii al
different origins which do not have the Same frequs=4 at all localions,
and Froa tideg of varying magmiudes that "Idog reach their sai"siages ror~currenllt; with the peak flotas. See explanation in text in
Section,'JUXL" kaler-Surface ElevatiomO. The 1986 plot is a rarriecilun
of highua ter *arks and gaged recordingS and represnit the maxi" stages
of that flood.
r Elovalliorz
r Clevalicrts
r Elevalicns
20
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMT]ON DISTPICT 2111
SACRAMM-SM JMUIN DaM
MnXIM0 WnTEP SUPFACE ELE10ATIONSDEADHOPSE ISLPND
CMPS Of ENBIWEAS, sf~CWEPO C&IM16
FEWJAW IM
CHART 27 SHEET I OF 1
28-- 1 1 2-
26j
10
Trapper SlouSb
da
Middle Pivor Inland
Levee
21-
22-
20-?f1w1a, Piver a Barden Hiuag
Drexler Tract Levee, Crown
-J
18
16-A
z14-
12-c V ear eva ions
<E: 10-"M IDD-Year Eleva : ions
.....
....................
UO-Yea r Elevations --------------------------
IS86 Estimated Elevalio -s
2- .. .. ........
0 - - - - - - - - - -F F F T iT T T T r
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETSACWMffG-M
N MTh e IDD--, wxf %O-War water-surface elevation plots are miprofiltst they are derived from 4r#quency cunBs 0 re"rd&d nvxal NAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSmisum
st:94?slat
gaged locations. The stages result from storms of
d0feren t rig ns 4,hich do not have the sme frrc~uency at 211 locations, DPEXLEP TPACTand 4 rcm t, des of varying magnitudes, that spidaN ret6 *;eir maximum
stagPs coacurreftlIq uith the peak 4lous. See explanation in text in CMPS OF EN61WEERSi &19AMDrTO CALIFURNIA
section, 'Max&PA Naler-Suriace Elvvaiio&. The IM plot is a connection MWWY 1982
of highuater marks ard gaged recordings and represm%s the maximum stages
of the: flood. CHART 37A SHEET I OF I
Honker 7 Whi te Li i t lo-
Little -01sapp Intment
Cut Slough0
iti a t o
Slough
Connecti on
Slough
S,
Rivergh
Empire Trat Lovee Crown
ALL,
,n-Y... jnn-Y... s7i-Atinng200-Year Eleyatict s
1986 Egumated Elevation s
0
I I I I I II I I I I I
NMIThe 50-, 100-, II-A 30D~par water-surface elevation plots are not
profiles: 1heq are derived froot freWncy curves of recorded annual
maxisum stages at gaged locations. The stages result from stores of
different origins uh1ch do rat have the samm freqLwry at all locations~
and froa It6es of YaqzM aagnitudes that seldoa reach tW3r itaximiA
:
yes concurrently ulih the peak flows. See explanation in text in
el.alion, 'Maxi~ Water-Surfacp tlevatimie. The 1986 plot 13 a correction
of bighwate? sarks and gapd recardLnqs and reprtsenis~ the maxietm stwpsof that 11cod.
I Ii
I I I I I
20 30
I
40
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 202S
I I
50I
BACRAMM-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
I
60
MAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELIUATIMS.
EMPIPE TPACT
We OF ENGHTM, SAMMENTO CPLIFM6fEMM 1992
CHAPT 38 SHEET I OF I
35Salmon
Old Piver SZ!~~h
0 d Piver at Tracy Poad Bri lge
J 2 -Gaging Station
- 50
Lij - Fabiam Tract Lev" Crown
W 20-L -z
z0 15-
100-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevationsw-j
w
7 'P 7 levations~50-Year E
1, 86 Estimated Elevations
0 T
0 10 20 30 0 50 60
NOTEi LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET WX%WATO-SAN "M3N DELTA
The tO-, IM-, and 3M-Way waler-surlare elevation plats are not
problest they are derived from freque=4 mrYes of re~orded anwal MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSbax1muz 3laqes at gaged locallas. The stages result fro4 sUirm of RECLAMhTION DISTRICT 773different arig I ns uhich do not We the sane frequency at all locations, FABIAN TPACTand Iran tides of vanpng magnitudes that seldom reach their sax;wnstages concurrently uilh the peak 11m. Be+ explanation in text in CG:PS OF ENOIRMS SMAWMD CALIFORNIA
section, 4axi" Wter-Surf 2~ Elevations', The 1SE6 plat is a connection igaZi 1992
of highwater sarks and gaged rec:ordlngs and representsthe max1aut stages
of that flood. CHART 39 SHEET 1 OF 2
35
30
25
LW 20
z
z0 15
DL11
-j10
LJ
5
0j
I
.4
Fabian Pell (6rant Line) Carial
7T
Salmon
Slough
Brant Line Canal at
Gaging S
Tracy Poad Bridge
ation
Fabia n Island Levee Cro=
IGO
50-Year r1evatiuns
'86 Estimated Elevations
I I I I I I I I ~ II
I I I I I I Ii
I I I I I i I I I i 1
60 70 00 so
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
NOTE ~
The M-, 10D-, aid 300-year ualeT-surface eievatim plots are not
profiles; IhN are derived from freqiency curves of recorded ar"almaximum stages at gaqk locations. The stages rmll from storms at
differentorigins
which do not have the sam freq.*oq at alllocativns~
and f rom tides of varging mAgnitudes that seldom reach their max;mim
stages cancurren114 with the peak flows. See explariblitxt in text in
section, ~MaXLWA Waler-Surface Eleyalims'. The L996 plot ;s a canr*ttionof higtiuater marks ard
gaged retordinjs wid represents the aaxi~ stages
of that flood.
Year Elvvatl=5
-YLar Elevi3tion5
100
SP,GPdMTG-SAN JDMIN B&TA
RECLAMATION CISTPICT 773MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONS
FABIAN TPACT
CM OF ENSIMEnS, SKMENTO ChLIFORWIR
FEBAM 1992
CHART 3S SHEET 2 OF 2
Old River
13
12-Co
Fay ]stand Levee Cf-Dun
WL
z -7Zz0
7-DLd -
6-
5 11986
Eslixiated Elevations
3
NM-The M-, lW-, and 300-year water-surface elevation plols are nol
profiles: IhN art- derived Item IreWency curves of recorded annual
maximin stain at gagad localions, The stages result from stores of
differmt origins uhich do no% have the sate frequency at all locations,
and irox ndes of varying magnitudes that seldom roach their maxi~
stages concurrantly uilh the peak 41ows. See explanation tn text in
section, 'MaxivA Ualer-Surlace Elovallons. The 2906 plot is a connection
of
higWat:r
earits and gaged recordings and represents the maximum stages
of that fl Dd.
00-Year Elevations
IDD-Year Elevations
50-Year Elevations
21
----
i I I I I I I t I
I
0 10
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SACRNMD-SM JWMIN MITA
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2113MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONS
FAY ISLAND
CSWG OF ENGINEERS, SAMIR-M CRAFORNIA
FEBRUARY 1992
CHRPT 40 SHEET I OF I
kbi md
Old River Holland PutFPj)OSP)eEll rill ~ admou.d Pc :k Slvuq
Slough
Old Piver at Po
Gaging Station
k Slough
Holland Tra:t Levee ~roun
XA
A L
t
1986 Estimated Elevalio
K-Year Elevations
3
M-Year Elevations3CM -Year Elevations
-0
I I I I
10
I I I Ii
NOTE:
The 50-, 100-, and =NtaT ualer-swface elevation plots are not
profiles; ihe,4 are derlvk from frequency mrves al recorded annual
.n I " 3 1 ages at gaged locations. The %14qVS rv~lt from S to - of
dfl4rent orLQlftS WhICh do nOt haVe the SAMP lfeWtr[Cy at all lo...'and from 1 Ides of va rLli ng magnitudes
ifial seldom reach their maxiam
stages cor"ryenily uith the
p:aEkleflows.
See explanation in text in
section, ~KaxtKim Water-Wr fa c vatiorW. The IN6 plot is a cwtectionat highoaler marks and gaged recordings and represents the *aximm sta~ps
of that 41oM.
T I
20 30 40
LEVEE SThTIONING IN THOUSMOS OF FEET
PECLAMATION OISTPICT 2025
50 6
9hC1*MWfD-W M69JIM DELIA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEVATIONSHOLLAND TPACT
copps ar EksiNEERs, SAMAMENTO CALIFORNIA
FEBPLMY 1992
CHAPT 41 SHEET I OF I
2
Oulch Slcuuh Sand wund Slough Pock
Dutch
Slough
Slough
Hotchkiss Tract Levee Cj i)un
_j
F_ ~
VV
1886 Estimated Elevalion50-Year Eleval
5
kns100-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevations
0 10 20 30I I I
NOTE:LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
The 50--~ IUD-, and 300-year water-surface elevalinn pints arm not
profiles. they are deriyed fro* IrEqRncy curves of recorded annual
maxi" stages at qagqd locations. The stages result Iron storm of PECLAMATIDN DISTRICT 799d, (ferent origins which do not have the same freWN at all locations,
and fr a a I ides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their qaXLEUM
st ages concurrently uilh The peak flows. See explanation in text in
sect I orl,0
11axiiBum Water-Surface Elevationsm. The 1886 plot is a connection
of h ghuaier :harks and UaUed reccrdinGs and represents the maximum stages
of that I low d.
I
40I
50SACRAMNTO-SAN JOADUIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSHOTCHKISS TPACT
CORPS OF EN61NEERS, SACRAftENTO CALIFOR)iIA
FURIJARY 1992
CHART 42 SHEET I OF I
16
15
14
13
12
I I
LW 10
9
z8
7
6
5
3
2
NOTE:
Middle Piver Empire M I Wht5keq Slouq~
Lower Jones Traci Levee Crown
A
V~V
100-Year Eleval:ons 300-Year Elevations
1986 Estimated KlevaliorElevaricM
. . ...... ..
n1 1
21 1 L I
I It I
0 3I
0 4i I f I I I I I I
0
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe 50-, 100-, and 300-year VateT-sur4ace elevation Plots are not
proliles; theq are derived from frequencu curves of recorded annual
mall"u" 5 t2ges at gaged lDcotiom. The stages result from sti;Mq Of
different origins which do not have The same 4roqJency at all locations,
and from tides of varyIng Magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
cstages oncurrant 1 y u I th the peak flows. eee explanation In text In
se ctionp 'Maxi" Walar-Surface Etevatinns". The 1986 plot 15 a CohnOC11011
of bigNater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxi" stages
of that flood.
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2038
SACAAMMD-GAN JUAWIN OELTA
MAXINUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSLOWER JONES TRACT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACWMffD CALIURNIAFURUAPY 1992
CHAPT 43 SHEET I OF I
16
15
14
13
NOTEt
The 50--, ICD-, and 3"ear ualer-surlace elevation plots are not
profiles; they are derived from 4rPquencil curves OF recorded annual
maximm stages at gaged locations. The stages rmll from storms of
different origins uhich do not have the same Irequency at all location%,
and from tides ofYart;inq magnitudes that seldom reach their maximm
stages cencurrently with the peak flaus. Goo explanation in text in
section, 'Maxi" Water-Stirface Elevatjqn~m. The 1996 plot is a connection
Of h1ghuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxietim stages
of that flood.
5
4
3
2t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t I I t I I
10 20 30
LEUEE STATIDNING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2039
SACMVSPO--SPN JOAMN GELTh
NAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSUPPER JONES TRACT
COPPS OF MINERS, SACRMTO ULIFORNIMFEMAW 1992
CHART 44 SHEET I OF I
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
6
5
3
2
NOTE-.
Bishop Cut White Slc Hanker 01sa 3poinimenI
Cut 31cugh
Sul
req
;.
'n
I
Kin g Island Lt%fpe Crown(Its
levi
rdiz
A
50-Year Elevations11 0-Year Elevations 300-Year Elev
1989 rs-timated Elevanor s
0 10 2
LFUEE STAT
0 3
IONINS IN THOUSAN
0 40
DS OF FEETTh 50-, IDD-, and 300-gear water-surlace elevation plots are not
proftlesl thug are derived from lrnquenq curves of rerorded annual
lmaxi""' 5 lageS at gaged locations. The stages result from siorRs of
differeniorigins
which do not have the saMP frequenry a% all locations.
and from tides of varying magnitudes that spIdDa reach their maxiw-M
stages concurrenlig U11h The peak flous. ~ee explanation in text in
secl:vn, 'flaximia Walor-SurfacL Elevalll)&. The 1586 plot is a connertion
0 4 hiuhuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the saXINUMI stages
,,, that llccd.
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2014
face elevation plats are not
ency curves of recorded aimal# stages result From Stores of
he sane frequency at all locations,
I at se as reac t Ir
41s. See OXPIWalion in
a rtio&. The 1896 plot is onneclicn
gs and represents ft maxiKia stages
SAMMO-SM INGUIN OELTA
mAximumMAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSLITTLE MANDEUILLE TPACT
ICORPS OF ENOIRMS, SAM0M MLIFORNIA
MRUARY M2
CHART 46 SHEET 1 OF I
-161
15Midd e Piver San Joaquin River Old River-
Reach
14-
13 -Middle River at Baron sland
- Gaging Slation
12-
10-Man leville Island Leveo Crow A A
LL V\z
9 A-A n A
" -,/ V V- \ j
z0 B
,-
C: 7-- --------------
d 6-E-
11 1
1
55 -Y El
1986 Estimated Elevatiar 0 ear evation!s 100-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevations
2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOTD LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SAMWO-SAN JORWIN DELTA
The EG-, 100-, and 100-year vater-suriace elevation plots are not
profilest they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual NAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSmaximum slages at gaged locations. The stages result from stores of RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2027different origins ubich do not haye the same frequency at all locations, MANDEVILLE ISLANDand free 109s of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
slageN cwcurrently talb The peak flows. See explanation in text in CORPS OF ENowERs, SACWMffD MUMMAso C tion, 'Maximus Waler-Surlace Elevalzons'. The ISE16 plot is a cDmection FERM 19N.4 highwater marks and gaged rerxrd~nqs and represents the NaXLWA stages
of that flood. CHART 47 SHEET 1 OF 2
16
15
14
13
N8TEi
The SO-, 100-1 and 30Byear water-surface elevation plots are not
prMilps; they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual
maxIVA stages at gaged locations. The stagesresult from storas of
I illereni origins which do not haye the saw frequency at all Iccation,5,
and from tides of vaqinq magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrentlij uith the peak flows, See explanation in text in
section,011axinA ltater-Surla=a Elevalionj~. The 19B6 plot is a connection
athIghualer marks and gaged recordings and represents ft maxtsum stages
at that flood.
- -4 300-Ye4r Elevaticns
-!9- t0t)-Yelir Elevations
T
5
4
3
!~~iveror Connectu!"SI.-
Mandeville Island LOvee Crown
1986 Estimated Elevations
50-Year Elevations
2
60 70 80
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION OISTRICT 2027
SACAAMM-SAN iffigUiN DELTA
MAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONSMANDEVILLE ISLAND
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAMWO CALIFORNIA
FEBMW 1992
CHART 47 SHEET 2 OF 2
I
24
23
22
21
20
19
W18
~-4 17
z0 16
I-
1E 15
W' 14
12
12
11
10
Mokelumne Pi ver Snodgrass SlDuq E~ ~ Lost E lotic1h
Rl
rse
ut
McCormack William
Levee Cro
son Tract
wn
300-Year Elevations
1986 Estimated Elevations IN,
100- Year Elevations
50-Year Elev ttions
- - -
0 t
I
o 2T T T-T--F I
0 3 0 4 0 5(
NOTE tLEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
ap 50-, =-, md 20Q-Yfar uater-surlaco eInvalion plots are not
profilesi they are dOfLvod from frequency curves of recorded annual
maximum stages at gaged locations. The stager result from sloras of PECLAMATION DISTRICT 2110different origins which do nal have the F;amL frequency at all 1=020nS,an, from lides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrently with the peakflows. See explanation in text in
sectio"''
Maximum Waler-Surface Elavatims'. The 19H plot is a cDnr*ction
.4 h~qhuaier marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxtaus stages
of that 4lood.
BACAAMENTD-GAN nfiGUIN DELTA
NAXIMUM WnTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSMcCORMACK WILLIAMSON TPACT
CORPS OF ENMEERS, SACRAMITO CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 1982
CHART 48 SHEET I OF I
16
mpire Cu'
Slough
McDonald Island Leve e Croun
.4 300-Year
100-Year
ED
1986
Estimated
Ye
Elevations
6 0 7 0 81
14
13
5
4
3
2
NOTEi
The M-, 100--, w4 3DOL-War waler-surfacp elevation plots are nut
Profiles; they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual
maxxKm stages at gaged lacaltorts. The stages rmit from star= of
different origins which do not have the rw frequency at all locations,
and from lides of Yarying aagntludes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrentiq vith the peak flows. S" explanation in text in
section, 'Maxswum Valer-Surfacv Elevaliona. The 19B6 plot is a connection
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maximimstages
of that flood.
levations
levations
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2030
GACWMG-SM JMQUIN CELT6
MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSMcDONALD ISLAND
COWS OF WIMIRS, SACWCEWTO MYONIAFUM)M 1992
CHART 49 SHEET 2 OF 2
16
15
14
3
-j 12co
L"10L
z~-l 9
z0 8
(E 7
6
5
4
2
NOTE,
the b 100- and Ird)-ear ualp
50
SAEPRIENTO-SAN JOA91JIN DELTft
I
proftlesi tlw4 are derived fras! WATEP SUPFACE ELEUVIONSmaxlwa slages at gaged locatiort
6 Werml origins uhich do nol h McDONALB ISLANDand from lides of varying magnil:
rtages roncurrently wh lhe peaCORPS OF EMBINEERS,SKW"O WFURNIA
norlion,'llaxiKm Waler-Surfaze I FEBRM 1992
al higWater Rarks and gaged rec
of lhat Hood. CHAPT 49 SHEET 1 OF 2
16
15
14
13
11
10
z" 9
z0 8
_j
w 6
1j
3
2
Middle
Joaquin Rivers
River Reach
River 'ut 6 1 ough
Medf ord Island Levee Croun,A
A AV ~ _/ v
v
-d Elevatio is
50-Year Elevalion-9
- - -
011 1 IT-F-T-j
i
1l it it IT F T
n 2
11i 11111 1 1
0 31
LEQEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION 01STPICT 2041
NOTE;
The 5(F-, lW-,and M-ipar Lratermirface elevation plats are net
profilesi they are derived from frequency curves of recorded armal
maxtimm stages at gaged locattow. The stages result from storms of
different origins uhich do net have the same frequency at all locations,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
tages conwurrently ux1h The peat fl=. S~e explanation in IMI in
action, 'MaXLWM Walor-SuHaca Elevationso. The 1986 plot is a connection
of highuater *arks: and gaged recordings and represents the maximum stages
of that flood,
M-Year Elevations
100-Year Elevations
SACANSMO-SM JDAGUIN DELTA
NAXINUN WATEP SURFACE ELEUATIONSMEDFOPD ISLAND
CORPS OF ENSINMS, SACWMffa CALIMMIAFMRLM M112
CHAPT 50 SHEET I OF I
14
13
12
11
_j 10U)
WW14-
z~-i 7
z6
5
W~j
W
3
2
1
0
Lalham Slough
- F Middle Piver
Cut
Mi ddle Piver at Bacon Islan
iOaging Station MLIdred
psland
pi
Lc'vee uro nd,
a,
r,
A01
01
A A 1\-
_
7\
V
1986 Estimated Elevi tions50-Year Elevalzions
i o 2 0 3 0 ~ b
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2021
TEi
e 5&-, 100-, and 2M-year waler-surface elevation plots are not
ofilest thev are derived from freqxqicy curves of recorded annual
orimuit stages at gaged ~ocaliiins. The stages result from storms of
iferent origins which do not have The same frequency al all locatiow,
d from tides of varying magnitudes That saltim reach their maximum
ages Concurrently with the peak flows. See explanation in text in
Ction, 'Maximum Water-Surface ElffV2120n!e. The 1996 plot is a cormctionhtghuater marks and
gaged recordings and represents the maxiKs stages
that flood.
300-Year Elevations
100-Year Elevations
SACRAIWO-SAN MOM BEL76
MAXIMUM OTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSMILOPED ISLAND
CMS Or ENSIMEERS, SACIMENTO 0-70MIAFEBURY ISS2
CHART 50A SHEET I OF I
23-- IM
.1 - - I -
22-
4Beaver Glouqh F S. F Moke~ Lmne River mokelump ? River
21-
20- S.F Mokelumne River at
Neu Hope Lanc ing Gage
j_
U)
T:
18-
Ld
1- A
7L30a-year Elew ations
z6-
F__~1
'7
0 - Neu Hop ~ Tract Levee Crown 100-year Elevations
15
(E 41
50-Year Elevaliws
W
-12i
1986 Estimate d Ele vations
- zs AIt
V
to
0 10 20 30 40 50
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET e6mNINTO-Sm nAGUIN MITM
The V-, 100-, and 3M-gear waier-surface elevation plats are not
proliles; theq are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSlaxlftm stages al gaged locations. The stages result frozziorms, of RECLAMATION DISTRICT 348
ins which do not haye the same fre uency at all locationsdifIrrent ori NEi~ HOPE TPACTqg,
and I rom tides ofvarying magn3ludes that seldom reach their maxtouit
stages concurrently wilh the ppak flous. See explanation In text :n CCIPS OF ENBIRMS, SACMMD DUMNIAserlion, 'Maxi " Water-Sur face tleyauor,5. The IOU plot is a cowPz1iDn r9WJF0 1892
of hl ghwater narits and gaged renording5 and represents 1he maximum stages
of 1hat flood. CHART 51 SHEET I OF 2
30
29
28
27
-1 26V)
25
w 24
z23
z022
<r- 21
-j20w
19
18
17
16
MokeZumne Piver
±::Z519 e 1R this
be
u p
'each is based on slopetueen WPRR and Dry Creek
WP PPDry C
I
reek
Now Ho pe Tract Levee Croun
3GO-Year Elevations
100-Year va ions
50-*ar Elevations
19136 Estimated Elevation
6
1-7 1
0 7 0 8 0 91
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 348
NOTE t
7he &0-# JOD-p and 300-Vor waler-surfare elevation plots are not
profilest they are derived from freqjency curves ol recorded annual
maximum stages at gaged localsow. The stages result iron storms of
different origins uhich do not have the same freqLRrLLq at all locatioup~ Irm - of varying magnitWes that seldom reach their maximum
stages roncurrently w1h the peak flous. See explanatton in text in
section,Iftaximum Waler-Surface Elevatiowl. The leB6 plot is a connection
of hightiater marks and gaged recordings and repremnis the maximim stages
of that flom.
SACRAMMD--SAN XMIN UMTA
NAXINUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSNEW HOPE TPACT
CORPS OF' ENOINMS, SAMVMO CALIFMIA.
FEBRim im
CHART 51 SHEET 2 OF 2
Old Piver Indian S I
DredgE r Cut
ATaSF Pailroad
zATIISF Pail ciad
VBroocid Tran Levee Croun
A
V
zl~ /" N 300-Year Elevalions
V
---I F
Fn-YpAr Flpvatinp~
1906 Esumaled Elevatiom
n in
16
15
14
13
12
I I
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION 01~TPICT 2024
NOTE.
The 50-j 100-j and 300-gear waier-surface elevation plots are not
profiles: 1heq are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual
maximum slages at gaged locations. The stages result from storms of
different orLqins Which Ela not have the same Irequency at all locations,
and from tides of var41ng magnitudes that seldom reach their MQXLNUM
stages concurrentlij uith the peak Ilows. See explanation in text in
section, "Max1rJAM Water-Surface Elevations". The 1096 plat is a connection
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the MaXIMLI. Stages
of that flood.
Year Elewitim5
SKRMENTO-SM J06GUIN OELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSOWOOD TPACT
CCRPS OF ENGINUPS, SALPhNFNTO CAUMNIAMPUAPY 1992
CHART 52 SHEET I OF I
16
lid .4
Old Aiver
Dredger Cut
ATEF Pailroad
Pock Slough
AT&SF Pailroad
Palm Tract L evee Croun
A A
A
. ..... ..................
19B6 Estimate
I
d Elevatior s
50-YLar Elevalions100-Year E evations
1 n 2 0 3 0 il
15
14
13
5
4
3
2
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2028
NOTE :
The 50-, 100-, and 200-LIDar tralor-5urface elDVAILan plats are clot
praliles: they are derived Ircmirequency curves of recorded armal
maximum stages at gaged locations. The stages result from stores of
di4farenl origins uhirb do not have the same frecpjenctj at all locations,
and from lides ofvarqing magnitudP5 that seldom reach their maxiwm
stages concurrently with thepeak flovs. See explanation in text in
section, "Maxi" Wat,or-Surlace Eloyalions', The 1586 plot is a connection
of highualor m' rks and gaged recordings and represnts the NaALMIN Stages
a , I ha I I I and.
3DO-year Klevalloills
SACPAMENT11--96N JORGUIN DELTA
NAXIMUM MTEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONSPALM TPACT
CORPS OF ENGINEERSi SACPAMENTO C6LIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 1992
CHART 53 SHELT I OF I
35
30
5
0
Sugar
Cul
Tom Pa~
Slcug
ne
l
Old
bver
I
Paradl!;'-
Profile in Paradiso Cul
om May 30 June 4, 1952,
Cut
is based on high uater mai
1 ield obEervat ions, and
ks
~FC-2
a a
Pes
tor runs.
cadero Trart Levee Croun
300-Year Elevations
1C O-Year Elevations
50-Year ElevatiDni
1986 Estimated Elevatiar s
--
0 1 0 2 0 3
I 1 1 1 7 7
0 41
0 5(
RATE :
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe !OJ-, 100-, and 200-year uater-surlace elevation plots art, not
profiles*, 1huij are derived from frequenq curves of recorded annual
maximum stages at gaged locations. The stages result from storms ofRECLAMATION DISTRICT 2058
different origins which do not have the same frequency at all locations,
and from lidLs of varying magnitudes that seldom reach 1hpir maximum
stages ccricurrenily with the peak flows. See explanation in text in
section, 'Maximm Water-Surface Eleyations'. The 1996 plot is a connection
of hiqhualer marks and gaged recordings and represents the maximum stages
of that flood.
SACMNT&-SAN JONUIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SURFACE ELEUATIONSPESCADEPO TRACT
CORPS OF ENSINEERS, SRCR6MENTO CALIFORNIA
FERUPRY IS92
CHAPT 51 SHEET L OF I
35
30
5
0
- f r TOld River
Tom Paine
Slough
Sugar Cut
Plc:o NagleD Levee Cro%jn
01H Ptv--TrAAZ
Bridg~A
Gaging Station V300-Year
EYevaticns
_ ~T1986 Estimated Elevaliar s
50-Year Eleva ',ions
1110-Year El pvations
1 0 2 0 3 0 40 5(
NOTE.
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe 50-1 Ion-, and ~00-year water-stirface elevation plois are not
profiles; they are dLrived from frequanq curves bi recorded annual
maximLm stages at gaged locations. The stages result frort storms of RECLAMATION DISTPICT 1007dtf ie rent orig I ns 0 1 ch do not have the same frequency at all location.%,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that siildcm reach their ISULFAIM
stages concurrenilij wth the peak flous. See explanation in taxi in
section,lhaximum Vater-gurlace EjeVatLons~. The IM plot is a connection
of highuater marks and qaqed recordings andrepresents the maximum stages
of thatf I ood,
SACPAMENTO~-SAN JaAGUIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSPICO NAGLEE TPACT
COP29 OF ENSINEERS, SACPAMEN70 CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 1992
CHART 55 SHEET L OF 1
DFCG-5
16
4
3
2
SheepDd Piver
Slough
Quimby Isl and Levee Grown
A
V
1986 Estimated Elevation ;
50-Year Elevations 100-Year Elevation! 300-Year Elevat
- --
0
I I I I I I I I I I I I II
I I I I I I ~ IIF T
10 20 30
LEOEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2090
I I I
NOTE *
The 50-, 100-, and 300--%jear uater-surlace elevation plats are not
profiles; thvtj are dprtvpd Iran Irequency curves of recorded annual
maximum stages at gaged locationr, The stages result Iran storms of
differentorigins uh1ch do not have the !;m* irequenctj at all Locatims,
and from tides of varijing magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrently uxlh the pent 11ows. See explanation in text in
stclion, uliaxiKim Water-Surlacp Elevallons~. The IS06 Plot is a connection
a,hiqbuaier
marks and gag" recordings and represents the maminum stages
.1 that flood.
ons
SACRAMENTD-SAN JDAWIN DELTA
40
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSQUIMBY ISLAND
COPPS OF ENSINERS, SACRAKENTO CfUFOWAFEBRUARY 092
CHART 56 SHEET I OF I
44-
- LeveRL San Joaquin River42 .. ..... ..... . ..
-40
-38San Joaquin River i t Mossdale
aaglna Stat ,nn
36-
34-
J
Ju nction uith Old river
- 32-Baron Island Levee Croun
30-
28-w
26-
24-
22z
-20
- 50-yc-a Elevatlnn~:18
16-LL) -
i 14-L d -
1886 Lstittated U ?vatlOns IOM ear Elevatio s~ Par evations
12-
10-
8-
4- . . .
- - - - - -2 ---T--T--F-F-F-T-7-7 F- I T F7 F FT I I I
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOTE:
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETSACIMENTO-SfiN JUAWIN DELTA
The 50-1 103-~ and 3[Hl-qear Water-surface elevation plats are not
profiles they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSXa'AIWA SlaQ25 at gaged locations. The stages result from sterns of
different origins uhich do not have the sate frequency at all localwnsi PD 17and from tides 0 varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
Stages Concurrently Ulth the peak flct:s. See explanation in text in CORPS OF ENOINEERS, SAMM(TO CAUFMNinsecll0n, 'MaXi" Ualpr-Gurf ace ElevallOrd
.The tB86 plot as a connection FEBAUARY 1992
of h1glwater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maximum stages
of that flood. CHART 66A SHEET I OF 2
44
42
40
38
36
34
-J 32W30
28
LwL 26
24
22
o20~-4
18<r
D 16
-J 14
12
10
B
6
San ver
Walker
Slaugh
Brandl Bridge
Ga in 1 wi ng g -3 e
Ho !7 Levee Crown
V V
.4 lul)
A*k
50-Yoar E lovation5
I
IM Estimated Elovanom
j I
i
I
0~ I I I I I I I I I
;?
I ~ I I I I I I I
n eI I t I I I
n qI I I I I I I I I
0
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
140TE:
The 50-, 10t)-, and3G&-year uater---Wrface elevation Plats are not
prefiles; they are derived fram Irequency curves of retarded annual
mallaw" 5 tages at gaged locations. The stagesresult fron storms of
diflerent arigins which do not have the samefrequency at all
locations,and from tides of
varying magnitudes that seldom reach their joaxiKim
stages concurrently with the peak flows. See explariation in tOXI in
section, 'haxioun Mator-Surface EleYations'. The 1996 plot is a coNtection
of higWater marks and gaged recordings and represents the saximus stagesof that 4lood.
Year Elevalions
Year Elevations
0
SACRAMM&-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA
MAXINUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSPD 17
CORPS OF EN51NEIRS, SACRO20 CALIFORNIA
FEMAW 1992
CHAPT 56A SHEET 2 OF 2
16- J-
0l5 BPPC11ntM1?nt Slough Sar i JoacluipShime Bo ld~ ~ :8 :--:J~-~ai n-
River Piv,-r
Four I watile
Slough13
San Joaquin River a t Pindge
Purnp Gaging Sta tion
J12-
-
LdPir dge Trart Levee CrC14in
w10
z01-4
F-
' A7 T
6--911-Year Elevnlinns
100-Year Elevations3011-Year Elevations
5--1986 Estimated Elevatio 3
3
- - -T-T-F T2
11 1 1 T
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOTE.LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SACRWMO--SM MWIN CELTh
The 5fl-, 100-, and 311D-year water-5orface elevation plots are not
prcOiles; they: are &rived Iron froqjency curves of recorded annual MAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONSmallmum stages at gaged locations. Tho stages result from sionLs of RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2037different nrigins uhich do not have the saw 4reqL*ncy at all locatians, PINDGE TPACTand I rem t, des a, varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximuA
stages concurrent Iy
uith the peak flDus. See explanation in text in COPPS OF ENGINEEM, SAMMM CELIFORNIA
sec 11 on, Maxlwm Waler-Surlace Elevations'. The 1986 plot is a ccnneclion FE'DWIWY 1992
0 1 hig1water marks and gag" rLeordings and represents the maximum stages
of that flood. CHART 57 SHEET I OF 2
Fourteenm le Slough
RindgL Tract Levee Crown
300-Year E
100-Year 1
50-Year E lovatlDn-q
1086 Estimated Elevation s
- - -
7 0 gT T T
,
o 9(
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2037
NOTE I
The W-, lot)-, and 300-qear uater-surface elevation plats are not
profiles; they are derived from fri-qunncq curves of roc,orded annual
maximum stages at gagud locations. 7hp stages result from storms of
differentorigins uhich do not havp the same froquenctj at all locations,
and from tides 434 varying magnitudes that soldDe reach their maxiwatitges cofteurrezilly uzlh the peak flows. Sup explanation in text Ln
Lclion~ wllaxiwA Palpr-Surfaco Elevations'. The IM6 plot is a connection
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and rupresent5 the maxiK2 stages
of that flood.
I L-va t i ons:
levations
SACRMMO--SM MAWIN DELTA
NAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEVATIONS
PINDGE TPACT
CORPS OF ENSINEERS, SACRAnNTO CALIFORNIA
MMARY 1992
CHAPT 57 SHEET 2 OF 2
ishm JeIgphonR
Slough Cut Cut Roa j
Rio Blanco Tract Levee Croun
100-Year Elevation5 3 10-Year Eleva 5
- - - 50-Year Eley t I QQJ5
F986 Estimated Elevation ;
n M 2 0 2(
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
7
6
5
4
3
2
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2114
NOTEI
The 50-, 100-, and am-War water-sUrface eleMlOn plots are not
profiles; they are derived from Ireqjency curves Of recorded annual
maximum stages at gaged locations. The stages result from storms of
different origins iihich do not have the same freqwiry at all locations,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that seldto reac:h their saxiw-a
stages concurrewly uilh thepeak flous. Get- explanation In IeXt in
section, 'llax I vum Waler-Surfacp Elevations'. The ln6 plot is a ramectionof MgWilter marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxiwom stages
of that flood.
SACRAMNT0~6AN JDhGUIN DELTA
MAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSPIO BLANCO TPACT
COPS OF ENOINMS, SAMVIWO CALIFMAFEBMW 1992
CHART 58 SHEET I OF I
16
15
14
13
12
11
WWLLL
10
z" 9
z0
W6
5-
Whiskey lough Turner ul sari joacpln piv@ r
Lower Roberts ~!sland Levee Crown
A
I
VV
Kr~-Vpar F1
I
ovai Innn100-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevations
1986 Estimated Eleation!
-
0 10
NOTE z
Tt* 50--, IDD-, and
=,,r,UatVr-$Urface elevation plot$ are not
profiles; they are roe Irequency curws of recorded annual
max"I'm staWff at gaged locations. The stages rmll IrDO stores of
different origins which do not hwe the sue frequency at all locations,
an, Ires. tides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
51.QeS CDhc(Jrrenllq vilh the peak flo". Sam explanation in text in
..ct:c)no 'Kaxivam Ual*Y-Wrfaca Elevalao&. The M4 Plot 3S 4 =rMCILOnof
h;ghuat#r marks &-A gaged recordings and 1"resenis the maimum stages
of that flood.
Tt I k k i I k I I ; I i it
I I ~ t I ~ $ ~ I i $
20 30 40 50 60
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SAMVMD-SM MAWIN DELTA
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 684NAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONS
LOWEP POBEPTS ISLAND
CMPS OF ENOMMS, %MVMM CILMMIAFEBPM 1992
CHAPT 59 SHEET I OF 2
20
19San Burns Cut if
Joaquin
Piver
VLower Roberts Islar d Levee Cr wn
San Joaquin Piver at
Burns Cutoff Gage
300-Year
lw-yoarA-SB6 E:stimaled Elevations
-
6
7 N T r ,I I I
0 7i I I -T-T--f-T-F-T-
fl P
19
17
8
7
6
NMEiTho BD-, IDD-t " 3*-War water-surface elevation plots are not
Profiles$ thN art' derived from freqmhcg mrves oi recorded wwalmaximum stages at gaged lacaii". The 51,39es result Iroa stores of
differentorigins uhicti do not hm the same irpqx=4 at 411 locallons,
and I rom t ides of varging aagniiudps that Mckim r94d) their maximum
stages concurrently with 1he, peak flous. See explanation in text in
section,'Maximmi Uater-Wriace Elevai:o&. The IM plot as e comiection
ofhighwater marks and gaged recordings end represtnts the &axim stages
Of %11111 Flood.
Elevations
ElLvatims
Eleval3ons
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION 01STPICT 684
ShOW"G-W MAWIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSLOWEP ROBEPTS ISLAND
CM Or EMMERS, WMIUM CALIMNIAFEBRM 19112
CHART 59 SHEET 2 OF 2
33-
w an-d Irappa rT~l -4 ddle Iver 7
31- .
Levee Slough Levee Levee
29--
SanJoaq uin Piver
2 -7
-
25-
San Joaquin Piver at B randt Bridge Gaging Stal m-JEn
Z:
- Middle Poberts
F Levee Crc
Island
Lrn
23--Ld
I
Aw
2 -,
1
z 300-Year E14 vaiiorts"
zc 17- ar LIM"'u-, L anons
'z 1-5 ou-ye ar tieva llons
-j 31
1996 Estimated E [ovallons
7
5-0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NOTE t
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETSAMENTO-SAN XAMIN DELTA
The W-, 100-, and uator-surface elevation plots are not
prolilest lheq are=1
I ram frequency curm of rwxr&d antual MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEVATIONSmaximum smagos at gaged locations. Pie 31ages result from sicrits v4 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 524different urLgins uhicil do not twe the seat frequency at all lotatiots, MIDDLE ROBERTS ISLANDand from lides of varipng maTiUldes that seldom reach their maxivAMAPS cw=rrenily with the peak flous. riee explanation in text in COWS OF ENOTNMK, SAMMO CALITMlAsection, 'MxL&ja Water-Surface Elovatione. The L9N plot is a tomnoction FEBRLWZY 1932
of highwaler marks and gaged recordings and represonts IN maxt" slowof that flood. CHART 59A SHEET I OF 2
33
31
29
27
-J 25
23
21L
7
San Joaqu n Riveru-
Middle Poberts Island
Levee Croun
00-Ypar Elevations
to(
50-Year 6evalions
1966 Estimated El evations
60 70 80
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
I I II
SACRArENTO-SAN JNQUIN MIT11
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 524MAXINUN W~TEP SUPFACrE ELEUATIONS
MIDDLE POBEPTS ISLAND
CCQPS OF ENEIREERS, SAMMMO CALWORMIR
FMPUAW 1932
CHAPT 5SA SHEET 2 OF 2
NOTE:
The EO-, IOD-, and 300-year wler-surface elevation plots are not
profiles; thV4 are derived from freW*ncy curves ol recorded annual
saxi" stages at gaged Iccalians. Thestages
result Irom storms of
dz f fore" i origins wh' ch do mi have the sate freqmncy at all locations,
and f rot t ides a[ varying magnitudes that seldom reach 1heir zax;~stages comurrpntly uilh the peak flaus. See explanation in text in
svctim, 'Hax=m Rater-Surlace Elevatlo&. The ISR6 plot is a connection
of higWater earks and gaged recordings andraprosgnis the saximm stages
of that flood.
-Year Elevations
so
35
30
25 -
Z:
I--
Li
Lj 20L
Z~-l
Z0 15
w-j
10w
5
0 !
,
0
4 4
Middle giver Old Ri vor San Joaquin giver
Upper PobP 15 Island Levee Croun
Midd ~e RI ver alA/ lioury Brigde Gage
300-Year Elevations
100-YLar Elevallon5
50-Year Elevauon '.
Estimaled
I i I I I I
i 0I
I
Holtz
The 50--, IM-, and 3CO-year ualar-surface eleVallm plots are not
profilos7 they are derived Iroa freq~cq c~jrvex of rvcorde~l annual
mi:Lit5
tageslatgaged locations. The stages result lrom stores of
dilf rent crig ns uhich do not have the same frequency at all lotaiiansy
and from tideE of vaNing magnztudes that seldom reach their mayinua
s I
age:
cmcurrentiq with the peak Uous. See explanation in text in
secti n, 'Maximum Aaw-Surface Elevalione. The 1886 plot is a connection
u:highuater marks and gaged recordings and
rpprasentz;the maximus stages
o that Rood,
711111111 1~tlllfl~20 30 40
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 544
I I I II
I I 1 1
50SACRMITC-SAN .10AWIN DELTA
60
MAXINUM OTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSUPPEP POBEPTS ISBNO
coRps or Em;inEps, sAmmao curowhFEBAM 1992
CHART 60 SHEET 1 OF 2
35
30-
z0-1
15
10
0
SanJfiaqu in River
Upper Peberls Isl ind LGvee Croan
300-Year Elevalz
100-Y..r El.vat,
19B6 Eslimaled Elevation
50-Year Elevalion
s
60 70 80
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLhMATION D16TPICT 544
ns
ons
90
NOMTf* 50-p 100-1 and 300-year uater-=rlace elevation plats art, not
profiles; they are derived lroa frequency curves of recorded armial
AexlKm stages at gaged locations. The stages reinill from slorms of
dtiferent origins uhich do not have the swe frequency at all Locations,
and from fides of Yarying zagnitudes that seldoz reach their mm~stages concurrentiq uith the peak flows. See explanation in text in
section, 'timmuo Waier-Surfacp Elevations'. The IM plol is a connection
of highualfr mark~s and gaged rPccrdmqs and represents the maxi" stages
of that flood.
SMWENTO-SAN JMQJIN MTA
MAXINUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONSUPPEP ROBEPTS ISLAND
MPS OF ENUINEERS, SFUMMO C&INWilA
FEBPU.VY IS92
CHART 60 SHEET 2 OF 2
28
0
I. F 11 Leveo
Pivor Slought
Fourleenmile
SIOU0
~Uckleq Cove
San Joaquin Piver
San kapin Riv
Ourns Cultiff SAnini
er at
tStattm
Sargent
Le
Barnhart Tract
9 Croun
LV
300-Year ElevatiDr s
--74 44 100-Y bar Elevations-1986 Estimalo d MivaliDr s
511-Year El Yanons
0
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I i I I I t i I I
10 20 30
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
I I
40
NOTEi
The 5D-~ 100-~ and M3-year waler-surface elevalton plots are not
profiles: they are der:ved from frequerocy curves of rewrdk armal
maximum stages a% gaged local:=5. The sl"es result From storms of
different origins uhich do not have the saite 4requenni at all localtoas,and from tides of vaq:nq magnitudes 1W seldom reach thp;r taximA
stages concurrently uith the peak flOU3. Ste explanation in text in
section, 'Maximuz Water-Surface EIM12orkO. The IR86 plot is a cwr~iion
a:
litoWater marks and gaged recordings andrepresents the aaxwm stages
c that flood.
SACPAMWO-SAN JOAQUIN n&7ft
MAXIMUM WnTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONS
SARGENT BARNHART TRACT
UPS OF ENGINEMS, GACRAPENTO CXIFMIAFMMNY ISK
CHAPT 60A SHEET I OF I
Threptile Sl oughSan Joaquin River
MatjberrLI
Slough
-
16 -
152
14 -Sherman Island Levee Croun
Ld -LL'
13- -
LSan Joaquin Piver
z12- -
A Zat Antioch Gage
F-A
V Vz0
- Sacramento Pi er at
10-Threemile Slc Gage
Ld -
--I San Joaquin Piver at N AThrowle Slough gage
~00-Year E levations
6
50-Year Elevations 100-Year Elevations 46 Estimaled Elevations
-FT-F-F-T-T-T If
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NM LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SAMVENTO-SM JOAGAIIN BETA
The 50-, 100-, and 300-year waier-surface eleyaliGn plats are not
profiles; they are derived frot frequenty curves of recorded arnual MRIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONSzaxi= stages at gaod locations. The ;tsges result from storms of PECLAMATION DISTPICT 341differ ni origins which do not have the saw frequency at all locations, SHEPMAN ISLAND
:and , r m lides of varying uagnj tudes that "Idm reach their maximu%
stages concurtenily ulth The peak flovs. See expienation in text in CORPS OF ENSIMM, MWERTC MIFOAMIRsection, iMaa~mux Water-Surface Elevations. The 1986 plot is a comecilon FEMM ISR2
a f hilwater marks and gaged recordings mid represents the maximA staWsof that flood. CHART 61 SHEET I OF 2
19
18
17
16
8
7
6
5
Sacramento Pive ., Horseshoe Bend
Slough
Sherman Island LeveE Crown
V W
300- YL-ar tlovation:;
100-Year Elevations
bu-Year Elevalians
9B6
Eslim.;
6 0 7 0 an 90 100 11.
WrE% LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe M-1 IM-j and ON-War ualer-surface alevaiion plots am not
profilesi theq are derived from frequffictj rurvts of recorded anwalmaxi" stages at gaged Locations, TN staWi; result from storms til
different origlhs which do not have the saw freqLm~y at all lticattmtsj
and from tides of varying magnitudes that _qe1dox reach their maxiw.K
stages concurrentlt; uith the peak flous, See explanation in text in
seclton, 'MXL" Watpr-Surfau Eleva%io&. The L986 plot is a corriection
11 hLghuater marks and gaged recordings "represents
the maxiKm stages.1 that flood.
PECLAMATION DISTRICT 241
0
NNM11Eh1TG--SM JUAWIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEURTIONSSHEPMAN ISLAND
CORPS OF ENGINMRS, $A~O CH-IFORMFUMIARY IBM
CHART 61 SHEET 2 OF 2
18
17
16
15
J 14
13
12
z,, 11
zC) 10
9
8
0
Ma her Slouqh FyurleetimIlt,
Dleappiritirient
Slough
Slough
rou
Fjnail@ FivP
Slo
Eagh
M110
iSlough
AShin%a~
Tract Levee Croun
A7
W)-y- 171-41- 100-Year Elevation!
300-Year Elevations
1986 Eslimaled Elevali 5
f II I I I I i I I t I I I I
10 20
NOM LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDSThe 50-, IDO-, and 30Dyear uater-surfacv elevation plots are nal
profiles; 1heq are derived Ira* frec?Lvnry cirves of recorded arrml
za'""m stages at gaged locations. The stages result from sto~WCLAMATION DISTPICT 2115different origins Lhich do not have the swe lri?qjmvj at all locationsj
wd frox lides of varying magn:ludes that seldom reach their maxtwmstages cGnoirren1lij uith the Oak flous. See pxpl~lion
D;nltexi
in
section, 'ftaximm kalvr-!~jrfac* Eleyations. The 1996 pl s a connection
of bight:ater marks and gaged recordings wd represents the maximum stages
of that flood.
30
OF FEET
t I i
10"MqMfTO-SM JDAWIN D11TA
MAXINUM WATEP SUPFKE ELEUATIONSSHIMA TPACT
COPPS OF ENGINEM, SFIMAMENTO CALIFOMM
FEBWM 1992
CHAPT 62 SHEET I OF I
16
15
14
13
~j 12
WWL 10L
z, 9
z0 8~4
<r 7D
W 6
5
4
White Slouqh
Shin Kee Traci LVvef Croun
300-Yoar Elovations
1986 Fsumaled Elovatlarm
0
3
2I I I t I I I I i
100
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
NOM.
The W-, IW-,and 3M-yeaT uater-surface altvalion plats ari not
prolilesi t* are derived from irequorKy curves of recorded anhual
maximum stages at gaged locations. The stages result Iron stores of
different origins which do not have the s4we frequency at all IcLat2ons,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach Their maxi"
stages cortotirrentlal with it* peak Ilous. See explanation in text in
section, 'Ifaxitium Raler-Surface Elevetione. The 1996 plot is a connection
C, hLqhua%er marb and gaged recardings " rt-presenis ;he maximum stages
of that flood.
100-Year Elevations
SAWNW11-SRN n6GUIN DELTR
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSSHIN KEE TRACT
MG OF ENSINEMS, 91MMUM ULIFORNIA
TEBRM 1992
CHAPT 63 SHEET I OF I
35
0
Old Pivor Salmon
Slough Grant
Line
14:
Cal
L.I.-
Stark Tract Levee
A
Crown
V
-
50-Ye.r Elev.lio
300 Yed, Elevations
100-Year Elievation%
is
T06 ~Iimatec Elevations
0I I I j I f I I I I I I I I j I
~I I I
I I ~
10 20
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2089
I
30
NGTE,
The 50-, 100-, and MO~par water-suflace elevation plats are not
profiles-, they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual
maxlwA stager at qacltd lotallors. 7he stages result from storms of
differmt orig I ris uhich do not ~we the saw Ofituency at all locati=jand from tides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages V onrurr.ni 1 4 ulth the peak f1cus. See, expl anali an in text in
section, -1taximus Uater-Surfacp Eleyatixe. 1N 1596 plat is a commiecitoh
of higWaler marks and gaged recordings and represents if* maxim= sloges
of %hat flood.
RVNWflW0-GW ZA@UZN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFRCE ELEUATIONSSTARK TRACT
MW$ OF COMM, WWMffC CALYMNIAFORWY IM
CHART 64 SHEET I OF I
6-
Scuth Fork Mc keluzerto Piver
Siami lsliDd Leve ? Crout)
,-~Vv
1986 Eslinated ElevaticM-_j
3oo~y~,, Elevations
ons
100-year Elevations
- - - - - - -
0 10
I I I
NDTEs
The 50-, 100-, and 3DD~par Ual e r-wrfacp Plevation plots are not
profilesi they are derived I rot freqL*ncy curves of recorded anewal. I stmt stages at gaged locations. It* stages result , rns st . ras a ,
d if I erent orig I ns uhich do not haw the same lreqjencif at all locations,
and fro& tides atvaryirig magnitudes that seldom rvarh their maxi"
stages ccnmrrently ullb the peak ilow. SOO aXplW1atLCn, in text IM
3ect0n, 'Maxim Rater-Sur4ace Elevalionss. The 18B6 plot is a connntimof higNiater saris and gaged recordings wd represents the maximm stagesof that flood.
I
20 30 40
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSRNOS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 38
I I I i T T F T T 7 TI
50
GAMAMEW&-9ffi JDAWIN DEITA
60
NAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSSTATEN ISLAND
XM OF ENGINEMS, SAMMMC CALWOPNIA
FMWAWY 1932
CHART 65 SHEET I OF 3
18
7
6
5
4
Ll
South Fork Mo kelLmm Pivor 70 North Fo rk Mokeluvm River
North Fork
at Georgi
HoW Fumtioive~r3na Slough Gage
late
A
h Island Levee Croun
AV X
V V V 300-Year Elev tions
.. .........
100- "ear Elevations
IS86 Estimated Elevalion iM-Year E levations
-
60I I I I I I
70I i
NmtI
The 5D-, 100--, and 3m-year uater-surface elevation plots are not
Profiles; they are derived frct frequency curves of recorded annual
AaX)WA 516W5 at gaged locations. The siage5 result from slorms of
dilierem crigms which do not have the sap frequency at alL lecaims,and Irce u6es of
varying magratwoRx that seldom reach their maxi"514geS Cil=rrently with Ihe peak flows. See explanation in text in
spcl~on, 211axim "Itr-Wrfa ce Elevalloris. The 198d plot is a connection
of highualer sarks and gaged recordings and reprewls the maximcim stages
of that flood.
I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I i
80 so 100
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 38
WnImo-sw JDVJIN RITA
110I
120
MAXIMUM WATER SUPFACE ELEUATIONSSTATEN ISLAND
CW IT MINEMS, MMAMITO C&MMIA
FORM 102
CHAPT 65 SHEET 2 OF 3
AM.The r2D-, 100-j and MD~fear wsler-=Hace elevation plots are not
profiles; They are derived trot freqAncy curyes of recorded argual
maxim;um stagesat gaged localicrLv. The stages result from stvras of
different origins which do not have ]be same freqAncy if all locations,
and from lidos at vars4ing magnitudes that seldom rem:h their &usun
:1"sconMrren114 with the peak flM. See rxplanation in loxt in
ecuan, 'Maxiwa Water-Burface Elgvatiorrsz, The W66 plot as a cormenoft
of highuator marks and gaged recordings andrepresents the xaxi~ stages
of that flood.
Eleva I I 0n5
Elevations
Elevations
8i
I I I I i I I f Ii
I I I I I I I I I
120 130 140
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 38
SACPArMO-SM MAgUIN MIA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELDATIONSSTATEN ISLAND
WS OF ENMEMS, SACW"C C&IMIR
FMAM IBU
CHART 65 SHEET 3 OF 3
Paradise Cut Old Piver
35-- The slopi in Paradise Cut is bas ~d an high water marks
from May 30- Junel 4, 1952, field obst-rvaticns,
and ~IEC-2 backuater -wis.
J- 30-
Ste jarl Tract Levee Croun
L 25- ~A Z\
300-Year Ele ealions
z A0 20-
Ld
_j
Lj
1886 Estimated Elevations 50-Year Elevations
10-
UX -Year Elevations
- - - -5- 11 1111 -F F7 1 T 77 I
0 10 20 30 40 11:10 60
LEVEE STRTIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET%)CPNM(I,-W JDAII(IIN DELTA
WrEt
The BD--: IDD-o " =-%war ualer-scerlace elevation plots are not
profAlez; theq are derivvd frcm fr@qAfcy curves of recardpd annual MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSMULWA staqts at gagoil locations, The staps rmit from stores ot RECLAMATION DISTRICTS 2062, 2107different ariquis which do not have the swe frequercy at all locations, STEWART TRACTand from 13cles, of variling magnitu&s that svidom reach their maximum
31690s concurren Ily uith the peak Ilous, see vxplariation in toxt in =5 OF ENBINEERS, SAM"Xg MIFUMIAsoction, '11UL" Water-Surfam EICMLOfe. The M plot is a connection FEBRUWY 1992
of highwater marks W gaged rqcor4irns and rrpresents Ihe maximum 91bMof that flood. CHART 65A SHEET I OF 2
40
35-
C-J3 0
z
25
z
zo 20
w-J 15w
5
The slope oi ttm
on HEI
San Joaquin Piver is bas
-2 backwaler runs.
.-d
San Joa quin Piver
ilp
Sleuort Traci Levee Croun
San Joaqtj!
Gaging St
n Piver al Massdale
lion
100-Y
50-Year Elevation5
1986 Estimaled Elevalions
60 70 80
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTRICTS 2062, 2107
r evalions
ar Elevations
NOTES i
The 50-~ 100-x aid 3OD-utar ualer-surlace elevation plots are not
profiles; they are derived From fr@qAcx3j curm of recorded annual
amimm stages mt 9a* locatims. The stoges result from siams of
different crigins which do not have The saw 4r*qmwy at all locations,
and from lides of varying magrtitudes IW seldom. reach their ~LKMsl" coricurrebtly Ulth the p"t flous. See **lamtzon in Iml in
seclic"i rm"Ibum Uater-Surfarp MoV211me. The IM6 plot is 41 com*rtimof htghwalar warks " gaWd mcordings ard repremts the saximm slowof that flood.
90
SACPAPIENTO-SAN JDAMIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEOTIONSSTEWAPT TPACT
COWS OF ENGINEM, GADRA10TO CM]FORNIA
FEBRL%RY 1592
CHART 65A SHEET 2 OF 2
1-6
49 1 1-
15-Sqc ~more Slough SE. I L Deokelum Nh I A Q
Slough. .
Slough
14-S. F.
- Moke I tmna
13- P: var
Terminous: 7m~l Lovea Cran
J 12- A
10LL V
0. . . .... ... .....
DW
6-1886 Estimated Elevation 50-Year Eleva ions 100-year Elevations
303-year I levations
J
2
0 10 20 30 io 50 60
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET WWOMB-SM J0119JIN DMTA
7he 50--, IM-, and 3OD-~var water-surlaca eleyation plots are not
profilest they are derived fro* Iroquency curves of recorded arwal MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSsaxi" slages at gaged locaiiwm. 71* stages result $roz storms of PECLAMATION DISTPIC7 b4Bidillerent origins uh3cj) do not have the same frequency at all locationst TERNINOUS TPACTand Irom lides 04 VaFq:ng abgniludes that -seldom reach their maxim&A
slages; cmcurremly uilh the peak iloux. See explanation in text Lft CMPS OF ENSNUM, SKRNEKTC MUMIAsection,
'Maximum Waler-Surface ElevalionO. The 1996 plot is a connection FEMMY 19R2
o4 htghuaier marks mr~d gaged recordings and represents the maxaftat stages
of that 41 wd. CHART 66 SHEET I OF 2
16-
15-White Slv-qh Suard POW Up land Canal
14-
13-- Terminaus Tra cl I.E vee Croun
2--J
1
Li -
11 10-LL
!00-Yea Mwvanunh300-Y Ele latims
z0 8-
z
ADw
6-
5- 50-Year Eleva itins
2
60 70 80 90 100 110 120
NOTE tLEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANOS OF FEET SKRNWD--AN "QUIN MIA
The SD-, 100-, and 300-tpar W@r-surface elevation plols are not
profilm they are derived from lreqwcy curves of recorded annual MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSout" 5 lages at gwpd Iccations. The slagos result Irna storms of RECLAMATION OISTPICT 548difforent crigins uhich do not hm the same frequency at all lecations, TEPMINOUG TPACTand from 11des of
varying magnitudes that spldoa reach their matwimstages convirrenIly Lath the peak ficus. See aVlanalion in text in CM W MhUM, 9CRMENTD DUFMIAsection, 111"twot gater-Surface Elevations'. 'The 1986 plot IS a conr*C110n FEBW-kVY ISUof highubw marks and gaged recarziings and reprowts The m":wA stagesof that 410M. CHART 66 SHEET 2 OF 2
16
15
7
6
5
4
,3
2
8-
. ..... reemilo- gin In
Slough River
San kaqWnThreemile SI'
River at
Vugh Gage
Tjj: tchell Island Levve Croun
A
'11~~ h/\ AV
-----------
bU-Year E
I
levations
1986 Est imated Elevations
0I I 1
1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
11 1
10 20
NaTU LEUEE STATIONING INThe 50-, 100,-, aid 3M-yqjr watersurfm~p q1tval ton plots are not
proh)m tt*y are derived fro@ 1rtqwm:q curvas of recorded wmal
30
THOUSANDS OF FEET
"ximm stages at gaged locations. The stews result JrOa StOrIS Of RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1601different
Origins uhich do not have the smw freqjency at all Iccatlww,
and Irm tides of varying mapiludes that seldn reaMl their samwim
stages concirrently uilh IhR ppGk fl*o. Seeexplanation
In t#X1 2A
seciton, 'Maximn Uatpr-Surface El"alions'. The JSW plot is a cnnnection
*4 higWaler atirkS and gaged feCCTdings and represents 0* maximm stages
04 that flood.
I
io
I
-Year Elevations
100-Year Elevations
50
SAMMERTD-SM JYWIN DELTfi
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSTWITCHELL ISLAND
CM OF ENGINEERS, WWMD CALYMNIAnmam IGS2
CHART 67 SHEET I GF 2
16
15-+
14
13
12 -
NMThe 50-, IM-, and 3OD-tpar uater-surfam elevation plats are not
profiles*. 1hov are derived Iron froWency cums of recorded avujzI
swiw= stages at gaged Iticattem. Thestages rmll (rpm storms af
dLffrrent origin!; ;jhich do not two the same fre"ncy at all lzicatlwis~
and from tides ofvarying magnitudes; that so-ldom reach their saximm
stages co=rrmily utih she peak Ilous. See explanalion in text in
sectionp'Numa Wer-Surlace Elmillonsm. The IBM plot is a c"Mclion
of higWater *arks and qbM recardtngs and represents she uxmm stages
of that flood.
IDD-Year alevalims
5
4
3
P.
San Joarwin Piver
Tuilchbli Island Levee Crown
1986 Estimatod
Elevations
21
1 , , I I I I I 11
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,
I
50 60 70
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 1601
SAUMM-SM MWIN MTA
MAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEVATIONSTWITCHELL ISLAND
rMS OFENGINEMS,
SAMINUM MLIFWAFEWAM M
CHAPT 67 SHEET 2 OF 2
19
18
0
4.F. Mokelumne RivermokelLmrip Seorgiwa
o dra55 SI,
rodgrassSlough Piver
:Tyler I! Iand Levee Crown
A1986 Estimated E ILVatjons
Z_\1 A A'
)-Year Flovmlon!;
J-14
100-Year ElevatIong
300-YLa, Eluv.t m,
I
20
NOM. LEUEE STnTIONING
30
IN THOUSANDS OF
io
FEET
I
SRMVUTC-56N JOKIIIN D&TA
60
The 50-, IDD-, and 40-ipar ualer-surlace el evation plots are nol
MPXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONS:roiilest
ihey 4re derived frue froqjmx:y curves o4
recorldannual
""I mu" stages at gaged locations. Thestage,
re., I from lorms o , PECLAMATION DISTPICT 563TYLEP I SLANDdaHereni arigins which do not have the saoL~ frequericq at all localians~" from
Iides of
verging magnitudes 1hat soldoe read their max;mA
stages concurrenilq with the peak Uovs. See explaaahon in lexl in ORPS Or ENGINEERS, SAMMENTO CPLIFOPNIA
section, 'naximux Wait-r-Surface Ejevat:onsx. The IS% plol is a corneclion FOPLKY 1992
h:ghuater marks and gaged recordings and represents %he maximum stages0: that flood, CHAPT 68 SHEET I OF 2
5-
Georc~iana SIDugh
Crc
1
BV Elov
N
Tyier 2sland Levee Cro4m Z\
V---------
3M-Year Elevation,-
IUU-Year LIevalions
50-Year Elevallons.... . .... ... ...
1966 E,~;Iimaled Elevat ons
60 70
NCM:The 50-, IW-, and ~M-ipar uAter-surface elevation plots are not
pro4zies; they are derived from Irequency curves 04 recor6pti annual
maxIM 5 lages at gaged lofalions. 7he stages result Irom stores of
~i4leranl orig I ris uhich do not have the same frewenctj at all locationst" from lides of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their itaximm
stages cor"rrenilt; wh the peak flous. See explbnalian in text in
section, chaximut Waj*r-Sur42co Elevalions'. The 1986 plot is a connection
of bigWl ter marks and gaged recordings and reprexents It* maxi" stacips
of that tlood.
I I-
~ I I I I % ~I . .
I ~ ~ I i I ~ ~ ~ i ~ I
80 90 100
LEUEE STATIONINS IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLANATION DISTRICT 563
SS
iee
111on
t
able
110 ikSACWEWFD--SM XMIN UMTh
MAXIMUN WATER SUPFACE ELEUATIONS
TYLEP ISLAND
CORPS OF ENSINEMS, SACAMMO CRLIFMAFEBRIJOY IBM
CHART 66 SHEET 2 OF 2
40
35
J 30 -LO
Z:
Li
1w 25-
z
z20-
I--
-j 15-
to
5
Old PivPr liddle River
M
M.
c1lFtl
13,
1
idg. l3a g e
East UnIon Wand
wast
Wort
U nion Island LevpL Crcun
Wand
19H Estimated ElevalEO-Year Elevau
~ans
3ns
00-Year Eleyaliens
300-Year Flevalioris
0 10
NOTE;
Tt* 50-, 100-, and 3UO-qear waler-nurlace eltvatim plots are not
profilpsi theq are derived ~rw frRquency curves of recorded anntial
oaxia= stages at gaged lazaitons. The stages result from sloras of
different origim uhich do not have the 5ane frequ*ncy at all loca~icnsp
and frok tides ofvarying sagniludes 1hal ~1&ii reach their maxi~
stages cancurrenily u3th the peak 41ous. See eXplb-411on in text in
sectim, 'llaxirtz kater-Suriace Ejrvatjo&. the 1986 plot is a connection
ol hiq~water mrLs and gaged reccrdinvs and represents1ho saxi~ stages
of t hal il ood,
~i
~ I I I t I ~ i ~ ~ ~ I I l i I i i l ~ I I i I ~ ; ~ I I I I I I
20 30 10 50
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET MWENTO-SAN MAQUIN DELTh
PECLWTION DISTPICTS 1 and 2
60
WINUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEATIONSUNION ISLAND
CMS OF ENDINIMAS, SAMMENT(I rALIMNIArEERWY 1992
CHAPT 68 SHEET I OF 3
35
30
J 25Lo
Z:
I'j 20 -
z
0
Middle Piver lorlh Canal Old PiYerSrant
Line
Canal
West Uni m island110.
Hidd~
Borden
e Piver al
Highuay Gago
Union island Leve, ~ Creu
Old PivLr at
Clij t or, Cour t aage
300-Year Elevations
1986 ESILMaled Elevation: ;
50-Year Elevation i IUD-Yeal ElLvallons
60I
70I
NUTUThe 50-~ 100-; and 300-War waipr-surfaCt ItleValicr) plots are not
profLles~, they are derived froat irpqjprN curves of rW~orded arMal
lax1aum Stages at gaged locatimis. Thestages
result ;roz stores of
d :Hereniorigins which do not have the sao~e frequevvcy at all locations,
and I r m I ides of varipng magnitudes 1hat seldom reach their maximum
Stages co= rremly with the peak flows. See explariation in text in
section, 'haxi" Water-Suriace Eleval=0. The 1986 plot is a connection
of highualer marks ;gw gaged recordingsand reprewis the maxi~ stages
o~ that flood.
1,
I
80 90 100
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION OISTPICTS I and 2
I
110
SPEWENTO-SAN JM@UIR Da7A
120
MAXINUM AATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSUNION ISLAND
=3 OF ENGINMS, SACWeM MIFORNIA
nmw-wzy Im
CHAPT 69 SHEET 2 OF 3
35
30
-1 25U)
T-
z0 15
D
5
0
Brant Line Ca1
' alWing Levee
connecis 10
Old River
West Unicin Island East Union Island
Grant Line Carial
at Tracy Bridge Ba~ -
Unitin Island LP~ Po Cro;jn
30[Hear EleVatWnS
1986 Estiataled Elevationt
50-Year Elevat= 5 100-Year Elov; livns
120 130 140 150
NUTEt LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe ~D-, IGO-, and 300-tivar water-surkice olevalion plots are not
profilvs~ thaq are dvrived from frequency curves of recorded a-Mal"Ximm stages at gaged locations. The stages result from siorms of RECLAMATION DISTRICTS 1 and 2different origins uhLch do hot have the saw frewency at all locations,
and from tides oi varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maximum
stages concurrently uith the peak 11c". See expianalien in text in
secticno 'Maximum Raw-Surface Elevatims. The 19U plot is a connection
of highkiater "rks w-,d gaged reccedings wd represents the maximum stagms
o f that flood.
~ ~I I
I I I ~ ~ ~ i ,
160 170
SAMAMENTO-SM JOAQUIN DELTA
MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSUNION ISLAND
CDWS UF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO CALIFOR41A
FMUA;n 1992
CHART 6S SHEET 3 OF 3
Dredger Ctit
West East
A
The 50-
profile
maximum
Veale Traci
Levee Croun
differ@
and fro
stages
"010Dof high
of that
M6 Estimated Elvvatic~ s
50-Year Elevations
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
I
0
0 10 20
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
30
IOG-p wd 300-year ualer-sur4ace elevation plots are not
1 they at* derived from fre"ncy curves oi recorded ~lstages at qaW locations. 'The stages result from stcras af
t crigins; which do nct have the sme treqmncy at all localiviis,
tides ofvarging eagniludes that seldom reach their maximui~
~rrenlly Lath the peak Ilous. See explanation in text in
'llaximum Water-Surface Elevatiorus. The 1%6 plot is a conriectian
a,er marks and ga* recardiMs andrepresents the text" stages
I I cad.
3DO-Year Elevations
100-Year Elevations
SACRA."MO-SRU JMWIN CELTA
MAXIMUM OTEP SUPFACE ELEVATIONSRECLAMATION DISTRICT 2068
UEALE TPACT
MS OF ENSINEEPS, SACIREN70 CALIFORNIA
FERZKY ISW
CHAP7 69A SHEET I OF I
16
15-
2-
-I -ft
1 4 L.
Potato Slouq~ 7~Bn
.
-I
.
-Qmice Me deville I
SAn
Conneclim
SloughJenice Island Levee Crown
Joaquin
Pivor
Peach RoarhJoaquinPiver
1986 Eslimated Elevallc 5 50-Year Elevaliof~5luo-ypar Elevalloris
=)-Year Elovatim s
0 10
I
NCTE:
The M-, 1W-, and MO-War unler-surlace, elrva2ton plois or# not
profiles. they are derived from frequency curves of recorded annual
I aximm Stages at gaged locations. The sl4g~ result from stoms oi
6 :ffervol origins which do not have the mWq frequency at all locations,
and fros tides ofvarying Pagmiludes that seldom reach their maxiatz
slaWs concurrently uzlh the peak flws. See eVlartatian in text in
Sectlon, '11aximA 11ater-SUrface Elevationsc. The 1956 plat is a connection
ofhighuat:r,tats
and gaged recardithp andrepresents
the maximust stages
0 f that fl a.
I I I I t T I I I I I I I I 1 1
20 30 40
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMRTION DISTPICT 2023
I
50WWWO-SM MAQUIN DELTh
60
MAXIMUM WRTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSUENICE ISLAND
CCAPS OF M)REM, SAMMMa CALIFOUIA
FEBAM 1992
CHAPT 70 SHEET I OF 2
16
15 4-~JO&MIn
Piver
14,
13- AL
I
t,i6n.te Island Levee Crown
-j 12 -U)
z -
300-Year Elevations
z0
-j6-
Li
5
i
3
Estimated
ElevallDm
ear Elevations
ar Elevations
21
, , , I I I j I II
60 70
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION 01STPICT 2023
NMIThe 50-, IM-, and 3OD-yrar u&ter-surfacv elevation plots are not
prolilasi they are derived from frequencq curves ct recarded annual
041 Min slaqe3 at gaged locana-a. The Stages result from stores of
different origins uhich W not have the same froqjvKV at all lotationsp
and from tides of varying magnitudes that soldam reach their maxioum
slages concurretilli; vith the peak flous. See explanation in text in
section. mllaxiaum Water-Surlace Eleval:=O. The 1986 plot is a corr*cnon01 highwaler marks mid gaged recordings &-Pd represents the maximum s"s.1 that flom.
SACMUM-SM MMIN DELIA
MAXIMUN WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSVENICE ISLAND
MM OF MNEERSi SAM")M ULIFORRIft
FMPUMY 1992
CHART 70 SHEET 2 OF 2
I I
10
9
8
7
6
Middle Pi% North Victoria Old P iver_.Canal
_..
Victoria
edl 1,11
Old Piver at Bi ron Tract Gage
Vict oria Islaod Levoo Oroun
v
IOU-Year E evations-Year El,300 votions
1906 Estimated Devatiom 50-Year ElLvatiori
0
I I II
to
f
RmtThe 'M-, 100--, " 3OU-year ualt-r-surface elevation plots are not
proliles: they are &rived frc4 frequency curves of recorded anmial
maximust stages at gaged locations, The stages rvsull from sinr*s of
different crigins; which do not have the swe Irequenc4 at all locations,
and from ltc*s of varying magnitudes that seldom reach their maxiwum
Stages concurrently with the peak iLow. See explanaiim in text in
section, 'Kaximum Water-Surface Ilevalions. The 1986 plat is a connection
of highualer marks and gaged recordirigs andrepresents
the saxi" stagesof that flood.
I
20 30 40 50 60
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SACWERM-SM JDAMN DELTA
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2040MAXIMUM OTER SUPFACE ELEUATIONS
UICTOPIA ISLAND
CWS Or EKINEERS, SAMVWC CALIFOMIA
n~l~ IN2
CHAPT 71 SHEET I OF 2
19
8
17
16
14
L"L 13
z12
z0 11
10
w9
8
7
6
5I I I I I I [ j I I I t j I I I I I
60 70 80
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
RECLAMATION DISTPICT 2040
NOMIThe 50-, IDD-, and 300-40ar uaior-sur4ace eloyatitin plats are not
profiles: **q are derived from Iroquency curves of recorded annual
maximum steps at gaged locaitons. The slages result froa storms 04
differentorigins
uhich do not haye The same frequency at all locations,
and from tides of varying magnitudes that seldoa roach their maximum
stages co=rrently uith the peak licus. See explanation in text in
section, 'flaxt" Uater-SUrlace Eltwalio&. The 1986 plot is a conneciion
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxwA stages
at that flood.
300-Year Elevations
100-Year ElevallDnS
SAMMO-SM JUMIN CUTA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSVICTOPIA ISLAND
CORPS OF ENSINEEPS, SAMVWD CRAFOPNIA
FEBWARY 1992
CHART 71 SHEET 2 or 2
L
LSa
Snodgrass Slo)ta Cross Canal
ver
Georgiana Slough
300-Year
100-yea.
IS86
50-Year Ele% ,itions
. ...... ... .... .
0
0 10
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 554
0
Walnul Grove Levee Crcun
Elevatioris
Elevations
NCMt1he 5D--, M-j ard 3M-War waler-suriace t-levanor, plats are not
prafilesi they are- clerived from 4rowencq curves of recorded annual
MaXLKM Stages at gb* locations. The stages result froa sUms of
different Origins which do not haN* the saw frpqjency at all locmli~," from ti&s a( Yarying magnituKias that seldom reach their- itaximum
stages concurrentlyWith the peak flows. Soe explanation in text in
54CIL&II SMULKM Water-Surface Elevation?. The ISM plot is a connection
of highuater marks and gaged recordings and repremts the maxima staqwof that flood.
20
OF FEFT SAmVU9o--W JOWIN MUR
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSWALNUT GPOUE
CMPS OF MINEERS, SAMI~WUG ULTONIAnmAuPAY ism
CHAPT 71A SHEET I OF I
16-
15-False River 70ld Rive,71. San Joacriln Rivert
Fisherman's
........ . .
J 12-Uebb Tract Levee Crm n
-
ww
10A
LL
9-
z
C 7- .. . .............
-7=-j
6
50-Year Elevation! :
100-Year Elevations1986 Estimated Elevation s 3M-Year Elevations
3-
21m~f[iiiiI --r--T-T-T--i-7 I I
iI t I I I I I I I I I
I1
1 1 11
11 1 1 1
11
0 10 20 30 io 50 60
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET SKRNOUO-SM JMWIN DELTA
The 5D-, 100-, and 300~par water-surlace elevation plots are not
profileg; they are derived Inia frequency curves 0 recorded annual MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEUATIONSmaxi" slages at gaged localt"15. The stages result fron sloras ol RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2026different origins Which do not have the sue frequency at all Watt", WEBB TPACTand fret licles of varying wagniludes that xeldoa reach their miwA
:tagosconcurrently uLth lh# peak flotis. See explanation in text in MG OF EMEND=, &MMM CALIrWA
lion, 'MaxiKm Wer-Surlace Elevatjo&. The leed plot is a cnMwCl10ft FESAM Imof h4waler sarks and "d rpcnrdings and reprounts the saxiKm stagesof that f1iind. CHART 72 SHEET 1 OF 2
13
cut
-J
12-(0
Z: -4ebb Traci Levee CroLm
F-
WLL,
LL
W-i
w 6
5~ I
~1986
Estimated Elevatio
4
3
NMEi
The 5D-, IDO-, w~d 3DD-ipar uatv~ur4ace vlwvatim plois are nal
profiles$ ihey are derived froa freq-%-zj rurves of recorded v=410 axIVA I tages at gaged locations. Tht stages result from staras of
different origins which do not have the same freq-tentif at all locations,
and from udes al vartling ugn:ludes that seldom reach their maximm
si~Ku rancurreniZy with the peak flows. See explanalion in text in
section, 'Kui" Water-Surfacip Elevallore. The M plot is a connection
01 hiahu6ter marks and gagwd recordings and reprowls the baxiwm stages
.1 that 41 nod.
3OD--Year Elevations
IOD-Year Elevatioris
50-Year Elevations
2 ~, I I I I , ,
I 11
60 70
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
PECLAMATION DISTPICT 2026
SACR&'DffG-VW MWIN DETA
MAXIMUM WATEP SUPFACE ELEOTIONSWEBB TPACT
CMP$ Or E961NMRS, 5ftMW.NTO CAUFMIAFEBRM M2
CHAPT 72 SHEET 2 OF 2
NVEt
L J _ I
Middle Piver Woodu wd Canal Old Piver !:::~~NqrlhCanal
~ooduard Island Levee Cro, m
A AA A
V V 1, V
V
A Z
W -Year Lievations. ..... .
100-Year Elevations 300-Year Elevations
1986 Esilmaled Elevation
3
2
0
i t
to 20[ L
30
LEUEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEETThe 50-) IUD-, and 30D-year ualer-surface #I "ation plots are not
pralilesi they a" derived froit frequenq curves of recorded annual
maxia,us. stages ai gaged IDcai2ons. The slagts: result $roe stores of PECLAMTION 01STPICT 2072el fierant origins which do not have the ~e frequency al all locations,
and from tides oi varying m2gniludes that salc5pa reach their SULNumstages concurrently uilh the peak flows. Ste explanation in text in
sect3on, 'Kaxisum. Water-Surface Elevalions, The 19H plot 15 a cprwwclicn
of higiwaler torts and gaged recordings " represenis the ~tmum stages
of that flood.
40 50SACPMWD-SM JOPiMUN GELTA
MAXIMUM OTEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSWOODWAPD ISLAND
cams or Ewisaps, Shm-ma CALIFMNIR
FEBP-V%,W 1"2
CHART 73 SHEFT I OF I
J- I
_111"kipi San Jo louinF-m-n ille S1.0
Cove Riv ~rloughLast
4richt Elmunod Tract Levee Crown
1984 Esumaled Elevation 50-Year Elevation!
19
18
1?
16
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
10 20 30
LEVEE STATIONING IN THOUSANDS OF FEET
NOTE -
The 5D-~ 30-year ualer-surlace elevation plols are wtprol3lest they are derived from frequency curves of rv~ccrded arn-ul
maximan stages at gaged locations. Thestages rmIt from stores of
dif f erent or ' gins v)lch do not have the saame 4rKWcq at all lacaliona,
and from lj&s of varying magnitudes that seldom reach I heir maxim&tz
stages UncurrenlIq with the peak Cows. See. explanation in text in
w:tM snaxLnn Waler-SuHace Eleyal2orve. 7he M6 plot is a connectionof hignvater marks and gaged recordings and represents the maxi"
stagesof that flood.
-Year Elevations
-Year Elevations
SACPAWO-SAN JOAQUIN UaTA
40
MAXIMUN WATEP SUPFACE ELEUATIONSRECLAMATION DISTRICT 2119
WPIGHT ELMWOOD TPACT
CORPS OF MINM, &WMBT0 CALIFOIZ41A
FEB9LIARY 1992
CHART 71 SHEET I OF I
NI fn
2
NOP7H
LEVEE STATIONING IN
1DO's OF FEET
SACWAWO--eM MfMIN UMTA
LrEUEE STATIONING
BRSE MAP
CMPS IF ENBINUM, SqM~tMg CtLYCNIA
FERURY 1992
CHAPT 76
DFCG-5
MATCH 79
DFCG-5
MATCH 81
--.No
NOPTH
LEVEE STATIONING 1 114
100's OF FEET
SACPA'WO-SAN JDAWIN DELTA
LEVEE STATIONING
BASE MAP
WS OF ENGINEERS, SAMAIWO CALIFORNIA
Mom IS92
CHAPT 80
LEUEE STATIONING
BASE MnP
CWS OF ENGINEEPS, W~ :tLIFMNIMFEHXM 1992
DFCG-5
.
...............
----
I
............
...4
..
ps
NOPTH
LEVEE STATIONING IN
100's OF FEET
SACRAKWO-SAN JOAWIN DELTA
LEUEE STATIONING
BASE MAP
CM OF ENGINEERS, SAMVfNT0 CALIFWAFEMM iSK
CHART 84MATCH 83
MATCH 86
.. . .......
19
A~+
.. ........
NOPTH
LKLEUEE STATIONING IN
------- - --
100 OF FEET
nPWIN CELTA
LEUEE STATIONING
BASE MAP
MS OF VCKUS, eAMVVffc CAUTORNIA
FERWM 1992
CHART 85
MA
TCH
89
I-1c
------------------
1
710"
..
.............
Ii/
...........
ob.
I1~,
,_CT
I FIrl
1;(4Y~l
CD :0 --4
72
..............
11.
Ito
,6
..........
I
,
~-
4.1
,
lia
-F,
L;
~FQ
~-
~A-
MA
TCH
83
.
.
S
T
~
~
~
T
I
i~
~
.
~
~
~
~
T
LOW
EIR
OB
ER
A--
-4
1
5
L
A
N/
0
MA
TCH
90
0,
N~-
-/";
a
DFCG-5
MA
TC
H
86
47.
,
,
I
I
c
I
oI
II
00
.15
...
........
7fk
l
2T
2
4~
D
~~
u
r- m m
DFCG-5
MA
TCH
88