8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
1/35
Policy Considerations before BankPrivatization Country Experience
Dr. Ishrat Husain
Governor
State Bank of Pakistan
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
2/35
Outline
Background
Rationale
Modalities Pre-Privatization Activities
Case Studies
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
3/35
Privatization of Banking Sector in Pakistan
Background
Financial sector significantly altered in early 1970s with
nationalization of domestic banks under the Banks
Nationalization Act 1974.
The Pakistan Banking Council was set up to act asholding company of nationalized commercial banks and
to exercise supervisory control over them.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
4/35
Privatization of Banking Sector in Pakistan
By end of 1980s, the pre dominance of public sector in
banking and non bank financial institutions together with
instruments of direct monetary control was contributing
to financial repression, financial sector inefficiency,crowding out of private sector and deteriorating quality of
assets.
SBPs role as a central bank had been considerablyweakened due to the presence of Pakistan Banking
Council. Duplication of supervisory role was diluting
SBPs enforcement of its regulations over nationalized
commercial banks
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
5/35
Pre-privatization structure of Banking
Sector (1990)
Banks No. Assets Deposits Equity
Amount
(Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
Amount
(Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
Amount
Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
State-
owned
7 392.3 92.15 329.7 93 14.9 85.6
Private - - - - - -
Foreign 17 33.4 7.84 24.9 7 2.5 14.4
Total 24 425.6 100 354.6 100 17.4 100
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 1990-2000, State Bank of Pakistan
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
6/35
Privatization of Banking Sector in PakistanAt the onset of the 90s, the Banking Sector in Pakistanwas dominated by the public sector banks which werecharacterized by
High Intermediation Costs Over-staffing andOver-branching
Huge portfolio of Non performing Loans
Poor Customer Services
Undercapitalized
Poorly Managed / Narrow Product Range
Averse to Lending to SMEs/Housing & Other Segments
Undue Interference in Lending, Loan Recovery & Personnel
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
7/35
Rationale for Privatization in Pakistan
Privatization process initiated in the early 1990s as part of
economic reforms programme
Establishment of Privatization Commission in 1991 for
disposing state owned enterprisesMission statement of Privatization Commission
Privatization is envisaged to foster competition, ensuring
greater capital investment, competitiveness and
modernisation, resulting in enhancement of employment
and provision of improved quality of products and services
to the consumers and reduction in the fiscal burden.
Privatization Policy announced in 1998
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
8/35
Rationale for Privatization in Pakistan
1. Reduction in fiscal deficit
Fiscal deficit reached a high of 8.5 percent of GDP in
1987-88. Loss making making public sector
enterprises were a burden on the national exchequer.2. Increase in the efficiency levels
Efficiency levels of public sector enterprises were low.
Production costs of public enterprises were high as a
result of political interference.
3. To foster competition
State owned units when sold to different parties
would result in healthy competition in different
sectors of the economy.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
9/35
Rationale for Privatization in Pakistan
4. Broad basing of equity capital
Privatization would result in strengthening and
deepening of capital market when some percentage of
shares of public enterprises are sold to the publicthrough stock exchange.
5. Releasing resources for physical and social
infrastructure
More funds available for development projects.Privatization of loss making enterprises would give
govt. more fiscal space
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
10/35
Modes of Privatization adopted in Pakistan
The Privatization Policy of 1998 outlined the
following modes of privatization:
Total disinvestment through competitive bidding
Partial disinvestment with management control
Partial disinvestment without managementcontrol
Sales/ Lease of assets and property
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
11/35
The Privatization Process
1. Identification
2. Hiring of a Financial Advisor
3. Due Diligence
4. Enacting Regulatory and Sectoral Reforms
5. Valuation of Property
6. Pre-Bid and Bid Process
7. Post-Bid Matters
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
12/35
Steps taken for preparing banks for
privatization1. Amendment in Banks (Nationalization) Act 1974 in
1990.
2. 11,101 workers out of 39,277 were relieved from HBL,
NBP and UBL.
3. 1646 branches of NCBs allowed to be closed.
4. Rs. 46.6 billion injected as equity to recapitalize thebanks.
5. NPLs worth Rs. 47.4 billion transferred to CIRC1
atdiscount for disposal.
6. Tax refund bonds issued to NCBs amounting to Rs.6.5 billion issued
1 Corporate and Industrial Restructuring Corporation established in 2000 for acquisition of
NPLs.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
13/35
Steps taken for preparing banks for
privatization
7. Professional management installed in HBL, NBP andUBL.
8. Boards of Directors reconstituted with private sectorindividuals of integrity and eminence.
9. Promulgation of PrivatizationOrdinance in 2000
10. Introduction of incentive scheme for loan defaulters
11. Committee for Revival of Sick Units
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
14/35
Role of State Bank in Privatization
1. Analysis of issues, design of restructuring plan of
nationalized commercial banks (NCBs), monitoring
and implementation follow up.
2. Voluntary Separation Schemes for excess labor
designed and implemented with the financial
assistance of the World Bank.
3. Approval of the Chief Executives and Boards of
Directors of newly privatized banks according to the
Fit and Proper test
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
15/35
Role of State Bank in Privatization
4. Meaningful input on documentation viz-a-viz
Advertisement, Statement of Qualification (SOQ)
and Agreement for sale of shares and transfer of
management.
5. Screening and evaluation of the Strategic Investors
for clearance of purchase of 5% or more shares of
NCBs in order to ensure quality and competence of
buyer.
6. Resolution of the issues raised by the strategicinvestors during the process of privatization.
7. Evaluation of bids
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
16/35
Banks privatized so far
1. Muslim Commercial Bank Limited26 % shares were sold to the National Group in April 1991 for
Rs. 838.8 million. Another 25 % shares were offered for
subscription to the public in February 1992. Remaining shares
have been divested in January, 2001, November, 2001 and
October, 2002 for proceeds of Rs.1,287.2 million.
2. Allied Bank of Pakistan Limited
26 % shares sold to Allied Management Group (AMG)
representing employees of ABL, in 1991. Another 25 % sold in
1993, resulting in transfer of ownership from government toAMG.
3. Bankers Equity Limited
In June 1996, 51 % shares were sold to LTV Consortium for Rs.
618.73 million
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
17/35
Banks privatized so far
4. Bank Alfalah LimitedHighest bid of Rs. 1.64 billion received for sale of 70 % shares of
Habib Credit & Exchange Bank Limited (presently BankAlfalah) in June 1997. 2% shares were meant for the employees28% shares sold in block for Rs.1,226.0 million. The shares nottaken up by the employees were also sold. Sale Purchase
Agreement was signed on 13th December, 2002
5. United Bank Limited
51% shares sold in October, 2002. Payment of US$ 176,907,858
and Rs.1,852,500,000 received
6. Habib Bank Limited
Highest bid of Rs.22.409 billion received from Aga Khan Fund
for Economic Development, for sale of 51% shares on 29thDecember, 2003. Transfer to the new owners took place onFebruary 26, 2004.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
18/35
Banks privatized so far
7. National Bank of Pakistan
23.2% shares have been divested through IPO/POs in
November, 2001, February, 2002 (Rs.373.0 million) November,
2002 (Rs.782.0 million), November, 2003 (Rs.604.0 million).
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
19/35
Privatization of Banking Sector in Pakistan
Units privatized to date
( pees in Billion)
1991 to J n
2002
J l 2002 to
J n 2003
J l 2003 to
Jan15, 2004
o ate
Sector o. m o nt o. m o nt o. m o nt o. m o nt
Banking 4 5.6 2 12.9 1 22.4 7 41.0
US $
710
million
So rce: Privatisation omm ission
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
20/35
Post-privatization Structure of Banking
Sector (March 2004)
Banks No. Assets Deposits Equity
Amount
(Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
Amount
(Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
Amount
(Rs.
Billions)
Share
(%)
State-
owned14 518.8 18.6 379.3 20.1 22.5 17.2
Private 20 1840.3 66.0 1292.3 68.5 92.8 70.9
Foreign 13 278.4 10.0 198.0 10.5 26.7 20.4
Specialize
d banks23 149.8 5.4 16.1 0.9 -11.1 -8.5
Total 40 2787.2 100 1885.6 100 130.9 100
Source: Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
1 Three small new banks were set up in the public sector during the 90s. These included the First Women Bank, set up
to provide credit to women entrepreneurs; and two provincial banks; the Bank of Punjab and the Bank of Khyber.
2
These include: Zari Tarqiati Bank Ltd, Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan and Punjab Provincial Co-operative
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
21/35
Privatization of Banking Sector in Pakistan
Case Studies
1. Muslim Commercial Bank
2. Allied Bank Limited
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
22/35
Muslim Commercial Bank
First bank in the public sector to be privatized
On 6th April 1991, 26 % shares of MCB were sold to
National Group at a price of Rs. 56 per share, for a total
amount of Rs. 2.4 billion.
As part of the Sale Agreement, a further 25 % of shares
were offered for subscription to the public on 19th
February 1992.
Further shares were sold in January, 2001, November,2001 and October, 2002 for proceeds of Rs.1.3 billion.
Upon completion of disinvestments of 51 % shares, the
application of Banks Nationalization Act 1974 ceased on
MCB
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
23/35
Muslim Commercial Bank
Financial Indicators (1994-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 2001-02, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Assets (% of assets of NCBs)
%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Deposits (% of deposits of NCBs)
%
0
5
1015
20
25
30
1
9
9
4
1
9
9
5
1
9
9
6
1
9
9
7
1
9
9
8
1
9
9
9
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
Advances (% of ad vances of NCBs )
%
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
24/35
Muslim Commercial Bank
Non Performing Loans as % of Total Loans
(1993-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 1990-2000, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
0
5
10
15
20
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
%
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
25/35
Muslim Commercial Bank
Return on Assets (1993-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 1990-2000, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
%
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
26/35
Muslim Commercial Bank
Impact Analysis of Privatization
Assets as a proportion of total assets of the nationalized
banks grew from 18 percent in 1994 to over 28 percent
by 2003 an increase of 10 percentage points.
Deposits as a proportion of total deposits of the
nationalized banks increased from 17.6 percent in 1994
to 26.5 percent in 2003.
Advances as a percentage of total advances of
nationalized banks were 17.7 percent in 1990 which had
grown to 26.7 percent by 2003.
NPLs as percentage of total loans varied between a low
of 11 percent in 1997 to a high of 18.6 percent in 1993.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
27/35
Allied Bank Limited
Second bank to be privatized in the public sector
On 9th September 1991, 26 % shares were sold to the
Allied Management Group, which represented theemployees of ABL at a price of Rs. 70 per share
On 23rd August 1993, another 25 % shares were sold to
AMG at price of Rs. 70 per share
This resulted in transfer of ownership from Government
of Pakistan to AMG
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
28/35
Allied Bank Limited
In 1999, it transpired that one of ABLs major
defaulters had purchased about 35-40 % of ABL
shares from employees.
In July 1999, SBP imposed restriction on transfer ofshares from employees to non-employees except on
prior approval from SBP.
On August 3, 2001, the SBP removed the Chairman
and three Directors on the Board of ABL as they werefound to be working against the interests of ABL and
its depositors and appointed new Board.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
29/35
Allied Bank Limited
ABL was excluded from list of privatization and the
strategic sale of the remaining 49 % govt. share was
transferred to the SBP.
In February 2004, 6 parties were pre qualified for bidding
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
30/35
Allied Bank Limited
Financial Indicators (1995-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 2001-02, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
02
4
6
8
10
12
14
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Assets ( of assets of NCBs)
0
5
10
15
20
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Deposits ( of deposits of NCBs)
0
5
10
15
20
1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 00 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3
Advances ( of advances of NCBs)
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
31/35
Allied Bank Limited
Non performing Loans as % of Total Loans(1993-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 1990-2000, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
0
10
20
30
40
50
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
%
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
32/35
Allied Bank Limited
Return on Assets (1993-2003)
Source: Financial Sector Assessment 1990-2000, State Bank of Pakistan
Banking Supervision Department, State Bank of Pakistan
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
1
993
1
994
1
995
1
996
1
997
1
998
1
999
2
000
2
001
2
002
2
003
%
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
33/35
Allied Bank Limited
Impact analysis of privatization
Assets as a percentage of total assets of nationalized
banks increased from 9.6 percent in 1995 to 12 percent
by 2002.
Deposits as a proportion of total deposits of
nationalized banks grew from 9.8 percent in 1995 to
14.3 percent in 2003.
Advances as percentage of total advances of
nationalized banks peaked at 15.5 percent in 1999 but
declined to 11.2 percent by 2003.
NPLs as a proportion of total loans jumped from 16.1
percent in 1993 to 43.8 percent by 2003
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
34/35
Lessons Learnt
The Allied Bank was not transferred to a strategic
investor but employees. This approach proved to be even
worse than public sector ownership. Efforts are underway
to transfer the majority share to a private sector financialinstitution through competitive bidding process.
In contrast, MCB was sold to a group of private
strategic investors who have turned around the bank and
improved all indicators including improved service to
customers, technology upgradation and cost efficiency.
8/8/2019 Husain_PolicyConsid
35/35
Thank You