Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005) Derek Ortt April 17, 2007.

Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water

A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005)

Derek Ortt

April 17, 2007

Background• Previous research on TC structure and intensity

has focused on the interaction with the large scale environment (e.g. Gray 1968, DeMaria 1996, Ortt and Chen 2007) or TC internal dynamics (e.g. Schubert et al. 1999 and Kossin et al. 2000)

• Recent work has focused on the inetraction of the large scale environment and internal dynamics (e.g. Nong and Emanuel 2003, Lonfat 2004, and Ortt and Chen 2006)

• The role of microphysics on internal features has not been well studied (and will be discussed today)

Objectives

• To determine theoretically the differences on TC structure of ice vs water

• To determine if observed hurricanes match the theoretical model

Theoretical Results(Willoughby et al.)

Model Specifics• Non-hydrostatic and axissymmetric• 2km horizontal resolution for inner 100km, 55km from 100-

1500km from center, 1km vertical resolution• Governed by following equations

Time Marching Scheme

Computational Grid

Experiments

• W5A: Water microphysics, moist troposphere

• W5F: Water microphysics, dry troposphere

• I7A: Ice Microphysics, moist troposphere

W5A W5F

MSLP

RMW

MEAN RAIN

MAX WIND

W5F 34HR

WF5 54HR

I7A

MSLP

MAX WIND

RMW

MEAN RAIN

44 HR

WF5

I7A

Summary• The use of ice microphysics produces structures similar to

observed TCs– Convective rings in the ice microphysical simulations

produce structures and inward propagation similar to observed TCs

– Downdrafts are caused by melting of ice

– Water microphysics produce fewer convective rings and faster inward propagation of secondary eyewalls

• Not all convective rings produce a secondary wind maximum

• Do observed TCs have characteristics similar to these model results?

Observed Results(Heymsfield et al.)

Data and Method• In situ observations from Hurricane Humberto,

part of CAMEX (see Jan, 2006 JAS)– Particle Size distribution (PSD) probes with 25 and 100

micrometer resolution– FSSP probe that records data from 3 to 45 micrometers– Cloud particle imager– DC-8 Doppler Radar with 60m vertical resolution

• Gamma and exponential functions fitted to the data

• Only fitted distributions with r2 > .8 used• Vertical motions determined by subtracting

vertical motions of the DC-8 from the data

Ima

gin

g P

rob

e P

art

icle

Siz

e D

istr

ibu

tio

ns

FS

SP

Pa

rtic

le S

ize

Dis

trib

uti

on

s

IWC

Slo

pe

of

Fit

ted

Ex

po

ne

nti

al D

istr

ibu

tio

ns

AVHRR Satellite imagery

Ice particles from cloud particle imager probe on 9/23

9/23

9/25 (0019-0032 UTC)

Rain

Frozen

Slanted lines: Constant IWC

Summary

• Hurricane Humberto had high concentrations of ice particles

• Supercooled water droplets were confined to the strong updraft regions

• These updrafts match the results of Willoughby et al. in the numerical model simulations