Top Banner
HURO/0901/1472.2.2 SZEGED - TIMISOARA AXIS FOR THE SAFE FOOD AND FEED SZETISA1 Disclaimer The content of this page does not necessarily represent the official position of the European Union. 3rd Progress Report Meeting Timisoara, 26-27 January, 2012 Macroelements in the Romanian wheat genotypes. Effects of Fusarium infection on macroelement concentrations in maize genotypes Erdei László, Vashegyi Ágnes, Pető Andrea Department of Plant Biology University of Szeged
19

HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1. Macroelements in the Romanian wheat genotypes . Effects of Fusarium infection on macroelement concentrations in maize genotypes. Erdei László, Vashegyi Ágnes, Pető Andrea Department of Plant Biology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

HURO/0901/1472.2.2 SZEGED - TIMISOARA AXIS FOR THE SAFE FOOD AND FEED

SZETISA1

DisclaimerThe content of this page does not

necessarily represent the official position of the European Union.

3rd Progress Report MeetingTimisoara, 26-27 January, 2012

Macroelements in the Romanian wheat genotypes. Effects of Fusarium infection on macroelement

concentrations in maize genotypes

Erdei László, Vashegyi Ágnes, Pető AndreaDepartment of Plant Biology

University of Szeged

Page 2: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Macroelements in the Romanian wheat genotypes

Samples were collected from 13 localities in Timis and Arad counties:

1. Manastur – TM2. Sanandrei – TM3. Faget - TM4. Pietroasa - TM5. Lovrin – TM6. Aldesti – TM7. Dudestii Vechi – TM8. Horea - AR9. Siria – AR10. Recas – AR11. Semlac – AR12. Paulis – AR13. Barzava – AR

Ripen ears were separated into grains and chaff.

K, Ca and Mg were determined in both parts by atomic absortion spectrophotometer (Hitachi Z-8200)

Page 3: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Manast

ur - TM

Sanan

drei -

TM

Fage

t-TM

Pietro

asa- T

M

Lovrin

-TM

Aldesti -T

M

Dudesti

i Vech

i -TM

Horea - A

r

Siria

- Ar

Recas -

Ar

Semlac

- Ar

Paulis

- Ar

Barzav

a - Ar

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00 grain

chaff

μmol

K/g

DM

K concentrations (µmol K/g DM)

Page 4: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Manast

ur - TM

Sanan

drei -

TM

Faget-

TM

Pietro

asa- T

M

Lovrin

-TM

Aldesti -T

M

Dudest

ii Vech

i -TM

Horea -

Ar

Siria

- Ar

Recas -

Ar

Semlac

- Ar

Paulis

- Ar

Barzav

a - Ar

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00 grain

chaffμm

ol C

a/g

DM

Ca concentrations (µmol Ca/g DM)

Page 5: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Manast

ur - TM

Sanan

drei - T

M

Faget-

TM

Pietro

asa- T

M

Lovrin

-TM

Aldesti -T

M

Dudesti

i Vech

i -TM

Horea -

Ar

Siria

- Ar

Recas -

Ar

Semlac

- Ar

Paulis

- Ar

Barzav

a - Ar

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00 grain

chaffμm

ol M

g/ D

M

Mg concentrations (µmol Mg/g DM)

Page 6: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Conclusions

Potassium concentrations were similar in the grain, in Barzava and Faget slightly higher. In garain and chaff K levels near equal, but in some cases in grain it is higher or lower.

Calcium concentrations are 2 to 3-fold higher in chaff than in grains. In grains, no fluctuation was observed.

Magnesium concentrations are 2-fold higher in grains compared to tose in the chaff. The highest Mg concentrations in grains were fount at Barzava and Aldesti.

It is not known whether the differences are the consequences of the gentype or the agricultural site.

Page 7: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Macroelement concentrations in Fusarium-infected maize genotypes

From field experiments of Prof. Mesterházy Ákos, Cereal Research Nonprofit Ltd.

Maize genotypesZea mays L. cv. Sarolta – Fusarium resistantZea mays L. cv. Boglár – more sensitive

Fusarium inoculates

Fusarium graminearum (Fg), F. culmorum (Fc), F. verticillioides (Fv)

Infection: 8-10 days after flowering, with mycelia, using toothpick

Experimental design: 3 rows in 3 sites with repetitive rows of control and the 3 Fusarium strains. From each row 3 ears (with husks) and the leaves beneath were collected.

Page 8: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

26.08.2

011.

13.09.2

011.

26.08

.2011

.

13.09.2

011.

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

C Fg

Fc Fv

µmol

K g

-1D

M-1

SAROLTA BOGLÁR

Effects of Fusarium infection on K concentration in maize kernels (from the middle part of the cob). Comparison of two sampling dates and 3 Fusarium species (Fg, Fc, Fv) in 2 maize genotypes. Mean +- S.D., n = 9.

Page 9: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

26.08.2

011.

13.09.2

011.

26.08.2

011.

13.09.2

011.

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

C Fg

Fc Fv

umol

Ca

g-1

DM

-1

SAROLTA BOGLÁR

Effects of Fusarium infection on Ca concentration in maize kernels (from the middle part of the cob). Comparison of two sampling dates and 3 Fusarium species (Fg, Fc, Fv) in 2 maize genotypes. Mean+- S.D., n= 9.

Page 10: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

26.08.2

011.

13.09

.2011

.

26.08.2

011.

13.09.2

011.

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00 C

Fg

Fc

Fv

umol

Mg

g-1D

M-1

SAROLTA BOGLÁR

Effects of Fusarium infection on Mg concentration in maize kernels (from the middle part of the cob). Comparison of two sampling dates and 3 Fusarium species (Fg, Fc, Fv) in 2 maize genotypes. Mean+- S.D., n= 9.

Page 11: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Conclusions

Element concentrations (K, Ca, Mg) were higher in the infected kernels compared to the control.

Increase in element concentrations was proportional to the time passed after inoculation. Fist samling date was 8-10 days after inculation, the second one 3 weaks later, at harvest. By that time the infection was maximal and the kernels shrivelled.

Intensity of infection depended on the Fusarium species. Most agressive was F. graminearum, followed by F. culmorum and F. verticillioides.

Page 12: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Element concentration gradients along maize ears (base, middle, apex), in control and infected

samples

Page 13: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Control and Fusarium graminearum – infected maize genotype „Sarolta”

Base Middle Apex

Page 14: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Control - 36 kernels10 g

Infected -80 kernels10 g

Volume (and surface) relations of control and Fusarium – infected maize kernels

Page 15: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Base Middle Apex0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160SAROLTA C

FgFcFv

µmol

K g

-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0

50

100

150

200

250 BOGLÁR CFgFcFv

µmol

K g

-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0

20406080

100120140160180200 SAROLTA C

FgFcFv

µmol

K g

-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0

50

100

150

200

250

300 BOGLÁR CFgFcFv

µmol

K g

-1D

M-1

K concentration gradients along the maize ear as affected by Fusarium strains Upper row: samples at 26 August, lower row: samples at 13 September, 2011

Page 16: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Base Middle Apex0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40 SAROLTAC

Fg

Fc

Fv

µmol

Ca

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20 BOGLÁR CFgFcFv

µmol

Ca

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.802.00

SAROLTAC

Fg

Fc

Fv

µmol

Ca

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.0001.2001.4001.6001.8002.000 BOGLÁR C

FgFcFv

µmol

Ca

g-1D

M-1

Ca concentration gradients along the maize ear as affected by Fusarium strains Upper row: samples at 26 August, lower row: samples at 13 September, 2011

Page 17: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Base Middle Apex0.05.0

10.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.0 SAROLTA C

FgFcFv

µmol

Mg

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 BOGLÁR CFgFcFv

µmol

Mg

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0 SAROLTA CFgFcFv

µmol

Mg

g-1D

M-1

Base Middle Apex0.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

70.0BOGLÁR

CFgFcFv

µmol

Mg

g-1D

M-1

Mg concentration gradients along the maize ear as affected by Fusarium strains Upper row: samples at 26 August, lower row: samples at 13 September, 2011

Page 18: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Conclusions

In control, non-infected ears the element concentrations were near the same in the kernels taken from the basal, middle or apical part of the ear.In the dgnotype Sarolta, K concentration slightly increased, whereas Ca and Mg slightly decereased along the ear from base to apex.

At the infected middle partthe concentrations of all the elements incrreased. The enhancement was prportional with the agression of the Fusarium species, in the same order, as before.

Concentration values were calculated on unit mass basis. Since the infected kernels have much less mass than conntrol ones, per unit mass they containe larger number of kernels than the control sample. The higher element concentrations in the infected samples thus are du to the larger surface area of the kernels and/or the remaining tissues where these elements are lovalized.

Page 19: HURO/0901/147 2.2.2 Szeged - Timisoara axis for the safe food and feed SZETISA1

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due toProf. Mesterházy Ákos and Dr. Toldiné dr. Tóth Éva for the field samples of wheat and maize and for their help.

Thank you for your attention!