Page 1
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
HunterConferenceCenter,SouthernUtahUniversity
CedarCity,Utah
May12‐15,2014
Sanctionedby:
WesternAssociationofFishandWildlifeAgencies
WAFWAAgencyHost:UtahDepartmentofWildlifeResources
WorkshopCo‐Host:
WildFelidResearchandManagementAssociation(WFA)
WorkshopOrganizingCommittee:
OrganizingCommittee
Page 2
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
1
WorkshopOrganizingCommittee:
JohnShivikUtahDivisionofWildlifeResources
[email protected] *
LindaSweanorWildFelidResearchandManagementAssociation
[email protected]
[email protected]
DanCockayne
[email protected]
MichaelWolfe
UtahStateUniversity(emeritus)[email protected]
TeresaGriffin
[email protected]
*Presentaddress:[email protected]
Page 3
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
2
WorkshopSponsorsandVendors:
Page 4
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
3
SUGGESTEDCITATION
Completevolume:Shivik,J,andL.Sweanor,editors.2014.Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLion
Workshop,May12‐15,2014.CedarCity,Utah,USA.
Individualarticle/abstract:Author’sname(s).2014.Titleofarticleorabstract.Pages00‐00inShivik,J.andL.
Sweanor,editors.Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop.May12‐15,2014.CedarCity,Utah,USA.
ThecompleteproceedingsareavailableattheWFAwebsites:www.wildlife.utah.govhttp://www.wildfelid.org
Page 5
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
4
Preface
ChronologyofMountainLionWorkshops: 1stMountainLionWorkshop–Sparks,Nevada
2ndMountainLionWorkshop– St.George,Utah3rdMountainLionWorkshop– Prescott,Arizona4thMountainLionWorkshop– Denver,Colorado5thMountainLionWorkshop– SanDiego,California6thMountainLionWorkshop– SanAntonio,Texas7thMountainLionWorkshop– JacksonHole,Wyoming8thMountainLionWorkshop– Leavenworth,Washington9thMountainLionWorkshop– SunValley,Idaho10thMountainLionWorkshop–Bozeman,Montana11thMountainLionWorkshop– CedarCity,Utah
The11thMountainLionWorkshopwasheldatSouthernUtahUniversityinCedarCity,UtahfromMay12to15,2014.Thethemeoftheworkshopwas“IntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement.”Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch,Trondheim,Norway,gavetheKeynoteAddress.Dr.Linnell’sinspiringpresentationontheecologyandstatusofEurasianlynxprovidedmanycomparableinsightstomountainlions,anotherwidespreadspecieswithahighlyvariablestatus.AttheWednesdaynightbanquetDr.MikeWolfe,EmeritusProfessoratUtahStateUniversity,gaveanotherexcellentpresentationwithatalkentitled“Predation:theroadfrommythtoreason.”
Sessiontopicsincluded:stateandprovincereports;felidecology,conservationandpopulations;predatorsandprey;felidsandhumans;non‐invasivetechniques;andmanagementstrategies.Allofthepresentationswereprofessional,timely,andwell‐attended.PresentationsfocusedonpumaresearchandmanagementinthewesternU.S.(including3onrecentlyrecolonizedpopulationsintheDakotas)andCanada,withtwoadditionaltalksontheFloridaPanther.ToprovideinsightsintopumamanagementandconservationconcernsoutsideofNorthAmerica,WFAsponsoredDr.MauroLucherini,UniversidadNacionaldelSurinArgentina,whosetalkexaminedpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina.
Alongwithover50presentations,fifteenpostersweredisplayed,withtopicscoveringdiseases,feedingecologyanddiet,orphans,GPSlocationclusteranalysis,rangeexpansion,effectsofambientlight,comparisonsofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsofpopulationmonitoring,compensatoryandadditivemortality,andpuma‐humanconflicts.Twosessionsincludedfollow‐uppaneldiscussions.Duringa2‐hour,WFA‐sponsoredsessionWednesdaymorning,DavidStonermoderatedapredator‐preysessionthatincluded5invitedspeakers(BeckyPierce,DavidChoate,AlysonAndreasen,JeffVillepique,andMarkHurley)withintimateknowledgeaboutspecificpredator‐preysystems.Presentersdiscussedtop‐downversusbottom‐up
Page 6
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
5
forcesonapuma‐deersystem,thepotentialofwatersourcestofunctionasecologicaltrapsformuledeerandbighornsheep,pumaspecializationonnovelprey(feralhorses),rangeabandonmentbybighornsheep,andthedemographicresponseofdeertoexperimentalreductionsofcoyotesandpumas.Laterthatsameday,JohnShivikmoderatedasessiononpuma‐humanconflictthatincludedshortpresentationsandapaneldiscussionbyindividualsfrom6differentinterestgroups:sport‐hunters,houndsmen,livestockranchers,animaldamagemanagement(WildlifeServices),pumaadvocacy–philosophicalaspects,andpumaadvocacy–scienceaspects.Thetopicquestionwas“Howshouldwebalancepumaconservationwithpredatorpopulationreduction?”Thissessionwaswell‐receivedandmanyattendeesthoughtthatsimilarpaneldiscussionsshouldbeofferedatfutureworkshops.
Therewere188registeredworkshopparticipants.Wereceived$29,651.61inregistrationfees,contributions,sponsorships,andvendorfees.Weexpended$24,227.78whichleftuswith$5,423.83whichwassenttoWAFWAandwillbeavailableforthenextworkshop.Eachworkshopregistrantwasprovidedwithasatchelandbeaniewiththeconferencelogo.Thankstoalloftheparticipants,attendees,organizers,moderators,andvolunteersformakingthisasuccessfulworkshop!AspecialthankstoDivisionstaffwhoactedaboveandbeyondtheirnormaldutiesbyassistingwithregistration,refreshments,andrunningtheconference.TheyincludeNatalieBrewster‐Wilson,MindiCox,TroyDavis,DarrenDebloois,StephanieRainy,andHeatherTalley.KenLogan,CarnivoreResearcherwithColoradoParksandWildlife,requestedthatColoradohostthenext(12th)workshopin2017;allagreed.Theexactworkshoplocationwillbedeterminedatalaterdate.
JohnShivikmoderatingtheFelidsandHumanspaneldiscussion.
Page 7
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
6
THE11thMOUNTAINLIONWORKSHOPAgenda
Monday,12MayEveningSocial,Registration4:00–8:00p.m.IronGateInn,100N200WSt,CedarCity,UT84720Tuesday,13May8:15 Welcome–JohnShivik(UtahDepartmentofWildlifeResources)PlenarySession1–State&ProvincialReportsModerator:JohnShivik8:30 Utahmountainlionstatusreport,JohnShivik(UDWR)
8:45 Wyomingmountainlionstatusreport,JustinClapp(WDG&F)
9:00 Idahomountainlionstatusreport,JimHayden(IDF&G)
9:15 Floridapantherstatusreport,MarcCriffield(FFWCC)
9:30 Nevadamountainlionstatusreport,CarlLackey(NDW)
9:45 Washingtonmountainlionstatusreport,RichBeausoleil(WDF&W)
10:00 Californiamountainlionstatusreport,MarcKenyon10:15 Break10:30 Albertamountainlionstatusreport,JayHoneyman
10:45 Nebraskamountainlionstatusreport,SamWilson
11:00 NewMexicomountainlionstatusreport,EliseGoldstein(NMDG&F)
11:15 Montanamountainlionstatusreport,JimWilliams(MFW&P)
11:30 Arizonamountainlionstatusreport,AprilHoward(ADG&F)
11:45 NorthDakotamountainlionstatusreport,StephanieTucker12:00 Lunch
Page 8
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
7
PlenarySession2:KeynoteIntroduction:DavidStoner,UtahStateUniversity
1:00 Abigcatinasmallbody:DoEurasianlynxhavewhatittakestosurvivetheAnthropocene?Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
PlenarySession3:FelidEcology,Conservation,&Populations,Part1Moderator:TeresaGriffin 2:00 Potentialbarriersrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsin
Arizona.AshwinNaidu.
2:20 Theimportanceofscaleandbehavioralstateinpumaresourceselectionfunctions.KathyZeller.
2:40 California’scougarconnectivity:geneticsinformingconservationandmanagement.HollyErnest.
3:00 Populationgeneticsofasmall,isolatedpopulationofmountainlions:Barriers,inbreeding,andgeneticrescue.SethRiley.
3:20 BreakPlenarySession4:FelidEcologyConservation,&Populations,Part2Moderator:TeresaGriffin3:40 Homerangecharacteristicsofasubordinatepredator:selectionfor
refugiaorpreyavailability?PatrickLendrum.
4:00 GeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.RebecaJuarez.
4:20 IntegratingResourceSelectionandHarvestintoSpatialCapture‐RecaptureModelsforestimatingmountainlionabundance.KellyProffitt.
4:40 EvaluationofharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinUtah:Oquirrh‐StansburyandMonroeunitsascasestudies.MikeWolfe.
Page 9
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
8
5:00 SurvivalratesofcougarsinOregonfrom1989–2011:aretrospectiveanalysis.DarrenClark.
5:20 UsingDNAtoevaluatefieldidentificationofcougargenderbyagencystaffandhuntersusingtraineddogs.RichBeausoleil.
PlenarySession5:PostersPosterstobedisplayedduringentireconferenceintheYankeeMeadowsandVermillionCliffsRooms.Presentersinattendancefrom5:40‐6:40.
PeterAlexander.Cameratrappingvsradio‐telemetry:acomparisonofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsformonitoringcougarpopulations.
RichBeausoleil.OrphanedkittensinWashingtonresultinadecadeofnationwidecougareducation.
LinseyBlake.ForagingpatternsofcougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.
KevinBlecha.ImprovementsonGPSlocationclusteranalysistechniquesforpredictingfeedingactivities.
MarcCriffield.Trichinellaintwodisjunctpopulationsofpuma.
AaronGhaemi.ConfirmedmountainlionsinOklahoma.
BenjaminMaltetzke.Cougarresponsetoresidentialdevelopment.
RickMinter.WildpumasinBritain–exploringevidenceandgaugingpeople’sattitudes.
JohnOdden.Theecologyofaconflict:Eurasianlynxdepredationondomesticsheepandsemi‐domesticreindeerinNorway.
OmarOhrens.Therelationshipofruraldepopulationtopuma‐humanconflictintheAltiplanoregionofTarapacá,Chile.
SadiePerrin.Effectsofpumasex,season,andhabitattypeondiet.
Scarlett Sellers. Effects of ambient light on puma, deer, and elk activity.
JeffSikich.P22:WillthismountainlionmakeitinHollywood?
AlexViere.Pumaactivityandmesocarnivores.
MikeWolfe.Compensationandadditivityincougarmortality:learningfromheavilyandlightlyharvestedpopulations.
Page 10
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
9
Wednesday,14MayPlenarySession6:PredatorsandPrey,Part1Moderator:DavidStoner8:20 ProgramCluster:identifyingpredationeventsthroughclusteredGPS
data.PeterMahoney.
8:40 Cougarstrategiesoffeedingsiteselection:energymaximization,classicaloptimalforaging,orfeardrivenhumanaversion?KevinBlecha.
9:00 Estimatingmountainlion(Pumaconcolor)predationratesintherecentlyrecolonizedregionoftheLittleMissouriBadlands,NorthDakota,USA.DavidT.Wilckens.
9:20 Estimatingcougar(Pumaconcolor)consumptionratesandpreycompositionintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.JoshuaSmith.
9:40 Nowheretohide:pumas,blackbearsandcompetitionrefuges.MarkElbroch.
10:00 BreakPlenarySession7:PredatorsandPrey,Part2Moderator:DavidStoner10:20 Top‐downversusbottom‐upforcing:evidencefrommountainlionsand
muledeer.BeckyPierce.
10:35 CougarpredationintheMojaveDesert:seasonalspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencespreyselectionmorethanwateruse.DavidChoate.
10:50 VariationinpreyselectionandincidenceofindividualspecializationonnovelpreyintheGreatBasin.AlysonM.Andreasen.
11:05 Rangeabandonmentbyungulates:Predatoravoidanceorresponsetohabitatchangesinducedbydrought?JeffreyVillepique.
11:20 Demographicresponseofmuledeertoexperimentalreductionofcoyotesandmountainlions.MarkHurley.
Page 11
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
10
11:35 PanelDiscussion
12:05 Lunch
PlenarySession8:FelidsandHumans,Part1Moderator:LindaSweanor1:20 Cougarspaceuseonalandscapewithhighlevelsofanthropogenic
disturbanceinsouth‐centralUtah.JulieYoung.
1:40 Correlatesofpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina.(SponsoredbyWFA)MauroLucherini.
2:00 RoadimpactsonmountainlionsinOrangeCounty,California:usingmultipledatatypestoprioritizemanagementactions.PatrickHuber.
2:20 AnoverviewofpumadepredationtrendsinCalifornia,1972‐2013.AnneOrlando.
2:40 Floridapantherrecovery:Livestockdepredation,predationriskmaps,andnewapproachestocompensationprograms.CaitlinJacobs.
3:00 Break
PlenarySession9:FelidsandHumans,Part2Moderator:JohnShivik3:20 Anintegratedregionaloutreachandresearchmodelforwildlife
conservationacrosstheSanFranciscoBayArea.AnneOrlando
3:40 ByronBateman,representingsportsmen(deerhunters)
4:00 DanCocayne,representinghoundsmen
4:10 KirkRobinson,CougarAdvocate,representingphilosophicalaspects
4:20 BrettSelman,representinglivestockinterests
4:30 BobMcCoy,CougarAdvocate,representingscienceaspects
4:40 MikeBodenchuk,WildlifeServices,representinganimaldamagemanagement
4:50 PanelDiscussion:“Howshouldwebalancecougarconservationwithpredatorpopulationreduction?”
Page 12
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
11
6:30 SocialandBanquetHeritageCenter,105North,100EastPresentation–Predation:theRoadfromMythtoReason
MikeWolfeThursday,May15PlenarySession10:Non‐invasiveTechniquesModerator:KenLogan8:20 EstimatingCougarDensitiesinnortheastOregonUsingConservation
DetectionDogs.GregoryDavidson.
8:40 DNA‐baseddietidentificationofmountainlionsinsouthwesternArizona.JohnClemons.
9:00 PumaPlex:Arapidandhigh‐throughputmethodtogenotypesinglenucleotidepolymorphismsinmountainliontissuesandscats.AlexIrwin.
9:20 LynxmonitoringinScandanavia.JohnOdden.
9:40 UseofcameratrapstoassesspreyavailabilityanddistributionrelativetomountainlionpredationintheDavisMountains,Texas.CatherineC.Dennison.
10:00 Break
PlenarySession11:ManagementStrategiesModerator:KenLogan10:20 Conservationofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inarapidlyurbanizing
landscape;researchinformingtheneedformoreaction.T.WinstonVickers.
10:40 Predation‐specificresourceselectionbycougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.LinseyBlake.
11:00 TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild.MarkLotz.
Page 13
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
12
11:20 EffectsofRemedialSportHuntingonCougarComplaintsandLivestockDepredations.RobertB.Wielgus.
11:40 Researchtoregulation:cougarsocialbehaviorasaguideformanagement.RichBeausoleil.
12:00 Closingcomments,finalbusiness.
JohnLinnellandMikeWolfeoutsidetheHunterConferenceCenter.
Page 14
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
13
Session1:
StateandProvincialReports
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 15
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
14
EventsinUtah’sCougarManagement,2011‐2014JohnA.Shivik,UtahDivisionofWildlifeResources;[email protected] :Utah’scurrentcougarmanagementplanwasapprovedbytheWildlifeBoardin2009.Theplanincorporatedaregionalmanagementapproachwherehuntingunitsweregroupedinecosystem‐sizedmanagementareas,andideasofsource‐sinkdynamicswereimplemented.Someunitswereassignedaslimitedentryunitsandothersasharvestobjectiveunits,withothersbeingahybridofthetwo,splitunits,whichopenedaslimitedentryunitsandthentransitionedintoharvestobjectiveunitsforthesecondpartoftheseason.Theplanwasdesignedtobefolloweduntil2021,withmanagementrecommendationsonlybeingmadeon3‐yearcycles.However,continuedcontroversyanddiscussionsledtofrequentrevisionsbytheWildlifeBoardduringthe2011‐2014timeframe.Someunitswereputontopredatormanagementplans,andsomewereassignedminimumharvests.Acomplexflow‐chartandseriesofrulesthatdictatedallocationofpermitswasdevised.Anotherunitwasclosedbyemergencyaction.Mostrecently,theDivisionhasbeengivendirectionbytheWildlifeBoardtosimplifytheplan,whichwehopetodobyreturningtoaunitbasedmanagementsystemthatincorporatesdatacollectionatanecosystemscale.
Page 16
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
15
AssessmentofPopulationTrendsandManagementStrategiesforMountainLionsinWyomingJustinG.Clapp,WyomingGameandFishDepartment,260BuenaVistaDr.,Lander,
WY82520,USA;[email protected] (presenter)DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment,260BuenaVistaDr.,
Lander,WY82520,USAAbstract:In2007Wyomingbeganmanagingmountainlionpopulationsunderanadaptivemanagementplan,withharvestlimitssettoachievestable,source,orsinkpopulationobjectiveswithin5mountainlionmanagementunits(MLMUs)acrossthestate.Theannualmonitoringcriteriausedtoassesspopulationstatusprimarilyquantifiesthedensityofhuman‐causedmortality/1,000km2ofsuitablewintermountainlionhabitat,proportionofadultfemalesintheharvest,andthemeanageofadultfemalesharvested.Mountainlionmanagementstrategiesandharvestlimitsareproposedona3‐yearcycletoassesspopulationtrendandefficacyofmanagementstrategies.Harvestyear2012markedtheendofthesecond3‐yearcycleunderthismanagementplan,andweprovideanupdateontheeffectivenessofthestrategytosustainmountainlionpopulationsthroughoutsuitablehabitatatvaryingdensitiesforeachMLMUinWyoming. INTRODUCTIONIn2007,Wyomingbeganmanagingmountainlionpopulationsunderanadaptivemanagementplan,withharvestlimitssettoachievestable,source,orsinkpopulationobjectiveswithinfivemountainlionmanagementunits(MLMUs)acrossthestate.
Primarymonitoringcriteriawereestablishedviaempiricallytestedresearch
(AndersonandLindzey2005),whichprovidedinsighttogeneraltrendsinmountainlionpopulationsundervariousconditionsandhuntingpressures.Telemetrydatawerecollectedfromasampleofvariouscohortsofmountainlionsthroughouttestandreferenceareaswithinthestate,andpopulationestimateswereestablishedthroughmark‐recapturetechniques.Locationdatafromthesesampleswerealsousedinaresourceselectionfunctionanalysistoestimateandmapsuitablemountainlionhabitat.Huntingpressurewasappliedtotestareastoincreasemountainlionmortalityandtoestimateamortalitydensitythatresultedindecreasingpopulationestimates.Whenhuntingpressurewasrestricted,mortalitydensitieswereagainestimatedtodeterminethelevelatwhichpopulationestimatesrebounded.Ageandsexcompositionofmortalitydatawerealsogatheredthroughoutthisprocess.Generally,asrelativemortalityincreased(numberofmortalities/unitareaofsuitablehabitat),ahigherproportionofadultfemaleswere
Page 17
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
16
harvested,andtheaverageageofthosefemalesdecreased.Theoppositewastrueofthesetrendsasrelativemountainlionmortalitydecreasedacrossthelandscape.
Thesefindingswereusedasaframeworkfortheadaptivestatemanagement
plan(WGFD2006),whereprimarymonitoringcriteriacanbederivedthroughmountainlionmortalitydataincluding:(a)human‐causedmountainlionmortalitydensity/1,000km2suitablewinterhabitat,(b)proportionofadultfemalesharvested,(c)meanageofadultfemalesharvested.(Femalestatusisdeterminedbylactation.)Thesecriteriaareassessedatthehuntarealeveltodetermineastatusofsource,stable,orsinktrends.Primaryhuntareamanagementobjectivecriteriainclude:
1. Sinkmanagement:reducemountainliondensities
a) Maintaindensityofhuman‐causedmortality>8mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2).
b) Achieveadultfemaleharvest>25%oftotalharvestfor2seasons.c) Progressioninmeanageofharvestedadultfemalesshoulddecline
to<5yearsold.
2. Sourcemanagement:maintainhuman‐causedmortalitylevelsthatallowmountainlionpopulationgrowthormaintainrelativelyhighmountainliondensitiesthatprovideasourcetootherpopulations.
a) Maintaindensityofhuman‐causedmortality<5mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2)
b) Maintainadultfemaleharvest<20%oftotalharvest.c) Maintainolder‐ageadultfemalesinthepopulation(>5yearsold).
3. Stablemanagement:maximizelong‐termhuntingopportunityand
populationviability.
a) Maintainhuman‐causedmortalitydensitybetween5‐8mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2)
b) Adultfemaleharvestshouldnotexceed25%oftotalharvestformorethan1season.
c) Maintainintermediateagedadultfemales(mean4‐6yearsold)intheharvest.
Inadditiontothehuntareacriteria,otherfactors(e.g.,totalage/sex
compositiontrends,huntereffort,andhunterselectivity)arealsoevaluatedwhenassessinghuntareaand/orMLMUpopulationtrends.
Page 18
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
17
Figure1.MountainlionHuntAreaandManagementUnitboundariesforWyoming,USAin2013.
Figure1showscurrentmountainlionhuntareasandMLMUsacross
Wyoming.Additionally,thewestMLMUispartitionedintoDataAnalysisUnits(DAUs)duetotheexpanseofcontiguoussuitablehabitatidentifiedthroughoutthewesternportionofthestate.TheseDAUsincludeAbsaroka(huntareas19and20),WindRiver(huntareas3,4,18,and28)andWyomingRange(huntareas2,14,17,26,and29).
MountainlionmanagementinWyomingusesthedescribedcriteriatoassess
trendsona3‐yearmanagementcycle,wherealterationstoobjectives,harvestlimits,seasons,andboundariesareminimizedduringamanagementcycletoprovidenecessarydatatodelineatetrendandavoidreactionarymanagementdecisionsbasedonvariationwithinanygivenharvestyear.The3‐yearmanagementcyclealsobolsterstheevaluationandclassificationofsink,stable,orsourceforhuntareasgivenpreviousdirectionintrends.Managingfora
Page 19
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
18
combinationofsource,stable,andsinkmountainlionsubpopulationswithinMLMUs(i.e.,atthehuntarealevel)providesflexibilitytoaddresslocalmanagementconcerns(e.g.livestockdepredation,proximitytoresidentialareas)whilemaintainingoverallpopulationviabilityonalandscapelevelaswellaslong‐termharvestandrecreationalopportunities(WGFD2006).
Harvestyear2012(1Sept.2012–31Aug.2013)markedtheendofthe
second3‐yearcycleunderthemanagementplan,whichprovidedcompleteharvestdatainWyomingnecessarytoassesstheeffectivenessofthemountainlionmanagementstrategyacrosstwocompletemanagementcycles.Therefore,harvestdatacollectedafter31Aug.2013arenotincluded.ThesedataalsoincludeannuliagesforthemajorityofmountainlionmortalitiesinWyoming,providingmoreaccurateageestimationandclassificationsthanfieldpersonnelestimationsalone.WYOMINGMANAGEMENTOBJECTIVESANDPOPULATIONTRENDSWequantifiedhuntareaobjectivesbasedonmortalitydensitycriteria(a)thatwouldclassifysource,stable,orsinkmanagementforeachmountainlionhuntareathroughoutWyomingatthebeginningofeach3‐yearmanagementcycle.MortalitylimitssetforeachhuntareareflectrecommendationsincludingWGFDbiologistperspectives,public/landowner/sportsmencomments,andthepotentialforlivestockdepredation,humansafety,andpotentialimpactstosympatricpreypopulations.ThestatusforeachhuntareawasestimatedusingallWGFDmonitoringcriteria,andwascomparedtotheobjectivessetforeachmanagementcycle(Table1).Sincetheimplementationofthemanagementplanin2007,mosthuntareastatusmatchedobjectivessetinthemanagementstrategy,withapproximately82%matchingortrendingtowardobjectives.Allhuntareasthatdeviatedfromobjectivesresultedfromastatusthatwashigherthanthepotentialobjective,adirectreflectionofapproximately25%ofhuntareasclosingannuallyduetoreachingorexceedingsetmortalitylimitspriortoseasonalclosuredates.Sixhuntareas(~21%total)adaptedmanagementattheendofthefirstcycletoincreaseallowablemortalitylimits,resultinginachangeinclassification(i.e.HAs1,3,6,13,22,and30),oneareachangedobjectiveclassificationbyreducingmortalitylimits(HA29).
Weusedtheproportionofmatchinghuntareaobjectivesasaroughestimate
toquantifytheeffectivenessofthemanagementplanatahuntarealevel,butitisimportanttoconsiderhowtheculminationofmountainlionmanagementatlocalscalesimpactthepopulation.Whenconsideringthehabitatthatsupportsinterconnectedmountainlionpopulationsstatewide,mortalitylimitsrevealedanoverallobjectivetoslightlyreducemountainlionpopulationsacrossthestate,andthemonitoringcriteriaweusedshowastatewidepopulationstatusthatistrendingtowardstabilityinthemountainlionpopulationinWyoming(Table1).
Page 20
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
19
Table1.MountainlionhuntareaobjectivesvsstatusforfirstandsecondmanagementcyclesinWyoming.Objectivesarebasedonlyonpotentialmortalitydensities.StatusarebasedonallWGFDmonitoringcriteriaforeachmanagementcycle.
FirstCycle(HY2007‐HY2009)SecondCycle(HY2010‐
HY2012)
MLMU HuntArea Objective Status Objective Status
Northeast
HA1 Stable/Sink Sink Sink SinkHA30 Source Source Sink SinkHA32 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Sink SinkHA24 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
Northcentral
HA15 Sink Sink Sink Sink
HA21 Sink Sink Sink Sink
HA22 Stable Stable Sink Stable
HA23 Sink Sink Sink Sink
Southeast
HA5 Source Source Source Source
HA6 Source Source Stable Stable
HA7 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Stable→Sink
HA8 Stable Source Stable Source
HA9 Sink Stable/Sink Sink Stable/Sink
HA10 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Stable/Sink
HA16 Stable Stable Stable Source
HA25 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
HA27 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Source
HA31 Stable Stable Stable Stable
SouthwestHA11 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
HA12 Stable Stable Stable Stable/Sink
HA13 Source Source Stable Stable
AbsorokaDAU
HA19 Stable/Source Source Source/Stable Source→Stable
HA20 Source Source Source Source
WindRiverDAU
HA3 Stable/Source Stable/Source Stable Source
HA4 Stable Stable Stable Stable/Sink
HA18 Stable/Sink Source Stable/Sink Stable/Source
HA28 Source Source Source Source
WyomingRangeDAU
HA2 Source Source Source Source
HA14 Stable Stable Stable Stable
HA17 Stable/Source Source Stable/Source Source
HA26 Stable/Sink Stable/Sink Stable/Sink Source
HA29 Stable Source Source/Stable Source/Stable
STATEWIDE Stable Stable/Source Stable/Sink Stable*Arrowsindicatedatatrendingtowardobjectives.**HuntArea32didnotexistpriortoHY2012,andonlyincludesoneyearofdata.
Page 21
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
20
DISCUSSION–SUCCESSFULAPPLICATIONSANDCHALLENGESWITHSOURCE/STABLE/SINKMANAGEMENTSTRATEGIESWeprovidethesoutheastMLMUasanexampleofawell‐balancedmountainlionmanagementunit,locatedinsoutheasternWyoming.Figure2depictsclassificationsofhuntareastatusbasedonmonitoringcriteriathroughoutthefirsttwocyclesofthestatemanagementplan(2007−2012).IndividualhuntareastatuswithintheMLMUhavethepotentialtobeinfluencedbyalterationsinmanagementobjectives,aswellasbynaturalvariationinpopulationdynamicsorenvironmentalconditionsinfluencingtrackingconditionsthatdriveharvestsuccess.However,theoverallstatusofthisMLMUindicatedasustainableandwell‐functioningsystemwheresourceareasprovideopportunityforrecruitmentandjuveniledispersaltoadjacentareas,stablehuntareasmaintainbalancedsubpopulations,andsinkareasallowincreasedmortalitywithoutjeopardizingtheintegrityofthepopulation.
Figure2.AverageHuntAreastatusclassificationwithinthesoutheastMLMUinWyomingfromHY2007−HY2012.MonitoringcriteriaindicatethisMLMUfunctionedatastable/sourcelevel([a]human‐causedmortalitydensity=5.0/1000km2suitablewinterhabitat,[b]%adultfemaleharvest=15.5,[c]averageageofadultfemalesinharvest=5.5years)
Wealsoprovideanexampleofthebenefitsderivedfromtheabilitytoadaptmanagementstrategies.In2011,theWGFDrespondedtopublicperceptionregardingregionalmountainlionmanagementaswellaspotentialconflict,
Page 22
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
21
primarilyintheformofdomesticsheepdepredationinnortheastWyoming.ThisresultedinhuntareaboundaryandmortalitylimitchangesimplementedinthenortheastpriortoHY2012todirectmountainlionharvestontoprivatelandssurroundingtheBearLodgeMountains(HuntArea32).WeusedakerneldensityestimatorasavisualaidtocompareharvestdensitiesrelativetothenortheastMLMUbeforeandaftermanagementstrategieswereimplemented.Figure3Ashowsgeneralareaswherethethehighestdensitiesofmountainlionharvesthadoccurredprevioustothehuntareaboundaryalterations(HYs2010−2011).WhencomparedtoFigure3B(HYs2012−2013),therestructureofthehuntareasresultedinashiftinharvestdensitiestowardthedesiredarea,drivenbydirectingharvesttothenewlyestablishedhuntarea32andaccompaniedbyanincreaseinoverallharvestlimitsforthenortheastMLMU.
Figure3.Spatialcomparisonofrelativeharvestdensitiesbefore(A)andafterdirectingmountainlionharvest(B)byincorporatinganewHuntArea32inHY2012withintheNortheastMLMU.
Aswithanyimplementationofwildlifemanagementstrategiesintendedto
addresscomplexecologicalprocessesandsocialcommentary,challengesandcomplicationsareinevitable.Aswelookatharvestdataacquiredovertwocompletemanagementcycles,weidentifysomeofthesechallenges,giveexamplesofwheretheyoccur,anddiscusspotentialramificationsforlimitationswithincurrentstatemonitoringcriteriaandmountainlionmanagementacrossWyoming. Interpretationofmonitoringcriteriatodeterminetrendsinhuntareastatuscanbechallenging.Lowsamplesizesinhuntareaharvestoftenresultinsporadicandhighlyvariableresults,wheretheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(criteria(b))canbeincreasinglydifficulttodetermine.Forexample,huntarea13consistentlyreportedlowoverallharvestnumbers,andthereforewasincreasingly
A B
Page 23
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
22
difficulttodetermineareliabletrendintheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(Figure4).
11 1
1
1
21
1
1
1
1
2
1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Subadult Male
Subadult Female
Adult Male
Adult Female
Figure4.Age/sexcompositionofmountainlionhuntarea13inWyomingfrom2007−2012.Boldnumbersindicatereportedsamplesizesforeachcohort.
Collectingadequateharvestdatacanbeaccomplishedeitherbyspatiallyexpandingtheareaunderanalysistoincorporatemorepotentialharvest,orbytemporallyextendingthegiventimeframetoallowmoreharvesttooccurandbeassessedundervariousmethods(e.g.,3‐yearaverage,runningaverages,smoothingmethods).Explainedwithinthemanagementplan,refrainingfrommakingmanagementchangeswithinthe3‐yearcycleprovidesvaluabletemporalbufferstoalleviatethesesamplesizeconcerns.However,furthercomplicatingsamplesizeadequacywithinthesescenariosistheapplicationofcriteria(c),wheretheaverageageofadultfemalesharvestedisfurtherusedtoassesspopulationtrend.Atahuntarealevel,withsuppressedoverallharvestalreadyinfluencingtheaccuracyoftheproportionofadultfemalestaken,thisissueisexacerbatedwhenthesamplesizeisfurtherrestrictedtotheamountofadultfemalesharvestedwithinahuntarea,andoftenresultsinasamplesizeof1or2adultfemalemountainlionsindeterminingtheaverageage(e.g.Figure4).
Tomaximizeaccuracyintrendanalyses,thecurrentmanagementplanalso
emphasizestheimportanceofusingmultiplemetricstodeterminepopulationstatus,suchasthedensityofhuman‐causedmountainlionmortality/1000km2(a).Althoughmortalitydensityistypicallyoneofthestrongestmetricsusedtodeterminehuntareastatus,thistoohaslimitations.Human‐causedmortalitydensityiscalculatedbasedontheamountofhighqualitywinterhabitatidentifiedformountainlions,andwasderivedinpartthroughresourceselectionmodelsdevelopedinselectareasinWyomingandextrapolatedviapredictivemapsacrossthestate.Theseempiricallytestedmortalitydensitiesandassociatedhabitatmodels
Page 24
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
23
areessentiallythefoundationforthisportionofthestatemanagementplanmonitoringcriteriainWyoming.Anassumptionnecessaryfortheapplicationofstatewidesuitablehabitatmodelincludethatmountainlionshaveindeedcolonizedallareaswherehabitathasbeenidentified,whichisgenerallysupported.However,withvariabilityinkeyhabitatcharacteristics(e.g.largeorsmallconnectedareasofsuitablehabitat,variouspreydensities,etc.)acrossthestate,weunderstandthatmountainliondensitiesareunlikelytobeuniformacrossthelandscape.Specifichuntareaswherelittletonosuitablehabitatisapparentrendersmortalitydensitiesinapplicabletoevaluate.Andwhilethemanagementplansupportstheabilitytorestructurehuntareaboundariesasnecessary,huntareasaremoreoftensplittocreatenewareasthanmergedtogether.Whilethesechangesareoftenimplementedtotargetharvesttospecificareas,theseactionsoftentiebacktotheimportanceofconservationofspatialareathatsupportthesamplesizesnecessaryforpreviouslymentionedmetricsofhuntareatrends.Althoughsamplesizeadequacywasgivenmuchconsiderationduringthedevelopmentofthestatemanagementplan,itnever‐the‐lesspersistsasaprimarychallengewhenanalysingmountainlionmortalitydata.
Anotherchallengethatmeritsdiscussionistheverbiageofobjectiveswithin
themountainlionmanagementplan.Theveryterm“objective”ironicallymaybesubjectiveundervariouscircumstances,aswellasatvariousscales.Atpopulationlevels(MLMUorstatewide),thegeneralmissionofmountainlionmanagementinWyomingisapparent:tosustainmountainlionpopulationsincorehabitatatvaryingdensitiesdependingonmanagementobjectives(WGFD2006).However,huntarealevel“objectives”forstable/source/sinkarelessclear.In2010,mountainlionregulationnomenclaturewaschangedfromtheuseof“harvestquotas”totheterm“mortalitylimits.”Thiswasdonetosupporttheconceptthatgiventheself‐regulatingtendencyofmountainlionpopulations,thelevelofallowablemortalityaremeanttoprovidelimitsthatmaybereachedthroughhuntingopportunity,butarenotnecessarilyafailureifnotmetorexceeded.Soalthoughsource/stable/sinkmaybeusedtoclassifyanobjectiveforeachhuntarea,itisthecombinedresultthatprovidessustainabilityinmountainlionpopulations.However,specifichuntareaswithinthestatedosetobjectiveslikenedtoaspecificmanagementgoal(e.g.,toreducelocalmountainliondensities).Althoughwecannotforcehunterstoincreaseharvestofmountainlionswithinhuntareaswhereharvestlimitsarenotreached,thestatedoesattempttoincreaseharvestlevelsbyprovidingadditionalandreducedpricelicensesinsomehuntareas,orbyalteringhuntareaboundariestofurtherdirectharvest.Thisseemscontradictorytothepreviousargument,andrendersobjectivesdifficulttointerpretdependingondesiredoutcomes.Forexample,whenquantifyinghuntareaobjectivesbasedonmortalitylimits,thestatehasshownanincreaseintheproportionofhuntareasthatwouldclassifyasasinkifallmortalitylimitswerereached.Whileaportionofthesehuntareamortalitylimitsaresetwiththeintentiontoreducelocalpopulationdensities,othersaresetsimplytomaximizehunteropportunity.Regardlessofintent,theflexibilityinthemanagementstrategydesignedtoregulatemortalitylimitstomeetobjectivesofsource,stable,orsinkhuntareasthereforehavethepotentialtobecomeskewed.
Page 25
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
24
Managingmultipleadjacenthuntareasatrelativelyhighmortalitydensitiescancauseareductiontheproportionofresidentmountainlions,whichmaycomplicateinterpretationofmonitoringcriteriausedtoassesspopulationtrends.Forexample,HuntArea1locatedintheBlackHillsisoneoffourhuntareasundermanagementforlocalreductionsintheresidentmountainlionpopulationwithinthenortheastMLMU.From2007−2009,thishuntareaexhibitedhigherproportionsoffemalesharvestedinresponsetoincreasedmortalitylimits.However,recentdata(HY2010−HY2012)haveshiftedthismetrictoarelativelylowproportion,duetoassumedsuppressioninoverallabundanceofmatureindividualsunderincreasingmortalitydensities(Figure5).Underconsistentlyhighmortalitydensities,theelevatedproportionofadultfemalesharvestedcannotbesustainedforprolongedperiods,andscenariossuchastheseconveytheimportanceofassessingharvestdatathroughtimetoidentifytrendsinthedata,aswellgatheringaspectrumofdatatobestdeterminethestatusofthepopulation.Inthissituation,thechallengethereinliesnotsolelyinthemanagementplanitself,butintheadherencetomaintainabalanceofsource/stable/sinkthroughmortalitylimitssetwithineachMLMU.
Figure5.HuntArea1trendinmortalitydensity(blackline)andage/sexcompositionofharvestedmountainlionsfrom2007−2012.Mortalitydensityvaluesfrom5−8generallyindicatestabilityinthepopulation.Notetheinverserelationshipbetweentheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(red)andmortalitydensitytrend.
Inconclusion,Wyoming’smountainlionmanagementplanhasthusfarprovidedaneffectiveframeworktoaccomplishthestatewideobjectivetoprovideviableandsustainablemountainlionpopulationsatvaryingdensitieswithinsuitablehabitat.Wyominghasreportedrecordharvestlevelsoverthepastseveralyears,butmonitoringcriteriadataindicatestabilizationintheassumedincreaseinmountainliondistributionandabundanceoverthepastfewdecades(Jenks2011).
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Mor
talit
y/10
00km
2 h
abit
at
Subadult Male
Subadult Female
Adult Male
Adult Female
Mortality Density
Page 26
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
25
Theflexibilityoftheplanhasprovidedtheabilitytobeproactiveinthepreventionofmountainliondepredationevents,toaddresspublicsafetyconcerns,andworkinconcertwithmanagementstrategiesaimedtosupportotherwildlifespeciesthroughoutthestate.LITERATURE CITED ANDERSON, C.R., JR., AND F.G. LINDZEY. 2005. Experimental evaluation of population
trend and harvest composition in a Wyoming cougar population. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:179-188.
JENKS, J.A., editor. 2011. Managing cougars in North America. Jack H. Berryman
Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
THOMPSON, D. J., AND LARGE CARNIVORE SECTION. 2013. Wyoming mountain lion harvest/mortality report: Harvest years 2010-2012 (1 September 2010 – 15 April 2012). Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Lander, Wyoming, USA.
THOMPSON, D. J., AND TROPHY GAME MANAGEMENT/RESEARCH BRANCH. 2010.
Wyoming mountain lion harvest/mortality report: Harvest years 2007-2009 (1 September 2007 – 23 April 2010). Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Lander, Wyoming, USA.
WYOMING GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT. 2006. Mountain Lion Management Plan. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
Page 27
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
26
RecentManagementApproachesforCougarinIdaho
JimHayden,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame,2885WestKathleenAvenue,Coeurd’Alene,Idaho83815,USA,[email protected]
Abstract:IdahocurrentlyoperatesunderaCougarManagementPlandraftedduring2002andoriginallyslatedtobere‐writtenby2011.CougarhuntingseasonsaresetonaGameManagementUnit(GMU)scale,butanalysisofharvestdataoccursacross18DataAnalysisUnitscomprisedof2to14GMUs.Seasonsaresetannually.Atthestartoftheplanningperiod,harvestin35GMUswasmanagedusingafemalequota.Oftheremaining64GMUswithoutaquota,9weremanagedundera2cougarbaglimit.Currently,managementof35GMUsremainsunderafemalequota,and13oftheremainingunitsaremanagedundera2cougarbaglimit.PredationmanagementplanshavebeenapprovedfortwoareasofIdaho(theLolo/SelwayandtheMiddleForkSalmonRiver)toaddresssubstantialdeclinesintheseelkherds.However,nocontrolactionshavebeenincludedtodateforcougarwithintheseareas.WhiletherearenofirmplansforaCougarManagementPlanre‐write,thisneedisbeingdiscussed.FloridaPantherStatusReportMarcCriffield,DavidOnorato,DarrellLand,MarkA.Lotz,andMarkCunningham;
[email protected] :Floridapanthers(Pumaconcolorcoryi)arefederallyclassifiedasendangeredbytheEndangeredSpeciesActandprotectedinFlorida.Assuch,panthersaremanagedundertheFloridaPantherRecoveryPlanwiththeoverallgoalofachievinglong‐termviabilityanddelisting.TheFloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission(FWC)initiatedresearchonFloridapanthersin1981.Overthelast33years,withassistancefromourFederalpartners,wehaveradiocollared229panthers,andhandled405neonatekittensatdens.TheFWCcontinuestoassessprogresstowardspantherrecoveryvialong‐termmonitoring,researchinitiativesaimedatassessingpopulationparameters,andworkingtoresolvehuman‐pantherconflictscoincidingwithagrowingpantherpopulationinshrinkinghabitat.TheFWCandourpartnersarecurrentlyfocusedonseveralresearchstudiesincluding:1)assessingmultipletechniquestoderiveastatisticallydefensiblepantherpopulationestimate;2)continuedassessmentoftheimpactsofgeneticrestoration;and3)monitoringthepotentialimpactsofwildlifediseasesonpantherrecovery.TheFWCandtheUniversityofFloridaarecollaboratingonresearchaimedatgarneringabetterunderstandingofhumandimensionissuesassociatedwithanexpandingpantherpopulation.TheseincludeanassessmentofthecausesofcalfmortalityonranchingoperationsinSouthwesternFloridaanddeterminingeconomicallyfeasiblemethodsofprovidingincentiveprogramstoprivatelandownerstoconserveandmanagetheirlandinwaysthatbenefitboth
Page 28
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
27
traditionallandusesandhabitatforpanthers.Floridapantherrecoveryreliesonlong‐termmonitoringdatatoguidepubliclandhabitatmanagement,minimizelossofhabitatfromnewdevelopmentsandtosupportcooperativeprogramswithprivatelandownerstohelpconserveremainingpantherhabitatinFlorida.NevadaCougarManagementTopicsCarlW.Lackey,NevadaDepartmentofWildlife,1100ValleyRoad,Reno,NV89423,
USA,[email protected]
Abstract:Nevada’sMountainLionManagementPlanwaslastupdatedin1995.Sincethattimetherehavebeenseveralregulatorychangestocougarmanagementinthestate,mostofwhichwereimplementedwiththegoalofincreasingannualharvest.Thiswastheproductofapoliticallychargedsystemunderwhichcougarmanagementinthestatewasoperating.Theserevisionsincludedreducedtagcosts,over‐the‐countertagsales,increasedbaglimitsandchangestoayear‐aroundseason.Thesechangeshavehadonlymoderateeffectsontotalharvest.Currentharvestlevelsrepresentroughly11%oftheadultcougarpopulationandarebelowthe5‐yearand10‐yearharvestaverages.Statewidecougarharvestprobablyhasbeenmoredependentonyearlyclimaticfluctuationsthanithasontheimposedregulatorychangesmentioned.CougarresearchcontinuesinwesternNevadawithacontributiontothejournalMolecularEcology(2012)byAlysonAndreasen,UniversityofNevada,Reno.AdditionalpublicationsfromthatPhDdissertationareforthcoming.Wecontinuetoinvestigateresearchopportunitiesandareanticipatingthatacougarandblackbearinteractionstudywillbegininfallof2014.WashingtonMountainLionStatusReport–2014RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;
[email protected] :Thisstatusreportwillbeanupdateofcougarresearch,management,andlegislativeactivitiesinWashingtonsincethe2011mountainlionworkshop.After13yearsofcontinuousresearchon6studyareasinWashington,manycougarresearchprojectshavebeencompletedinvolvingpersonnelfromWDFW,WashingtonStateUniversity,andUniversityofWashington.Muchofthisresearchhasbeenpublishedsincethelastworkshopandseveralmoremanuscriptsareinproductionandpress;thosewillbehighlightedinthispresentation.Activityduringthelast3legislativesessionssincetheMontanaworkshopwillalsobesummarized;theyincludeSubstituteSenateBill1885regardingfeedingofwildlifeandfinesandSenateBills5356and6287concerningtheuseofdogstohuntcougar.Finally,in
Page 29
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
28
2012‐13,WDFWadoptedanewharvestguidelinestructureincorporatingthesocialstructureofcougarsintomanagement.Thestatewasdividedinto49populationmanagementunits(PMUs)anda12‐16%harvestguidelinewasappliedtoeach.Thisprocess,aswellasresultsfromthepast2years,willbediscussed.EventsinCalifornia’sMountainLionManagement,2011‐2014MarcW.Kenyon,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife,1701NimbusRd,Suite
D.,RanchoCordova,CA95670,USA,[email protected] :Mountainlionsaredesignatedasa“speciallyprotectedmammal”forwhichhuntingisprohibitedandnofundsareallocatedformonitoring,researchordepredationandpublicsafetyresponse.Asaresult,California’smountainlionmanagementhasbeenguidedbystatelawthatislimitedtorespondingtohuman‐mountainlionconflicts,andconflictsassociatedwithsensitivebighornsheeppopulations.Althoughrespondingtomountainlionconflictsrepresentsanunfundedmandate,thepublicexpectsawell‐coordinatedresponsetosuchcallsforservicewhereindividualsperceiveathreattopublicsafety.However,duetorecentreductionsinforce,highpersonnelturnover,andreductionsinresourcesavailabletorespondingpersonnel,thisexpectationhasnotbeenconsistentlymetthroughoutthestate.Toamelioratethissituation,CDFWbeganrevisingthestate’smountainlionpolicy.Thiswaspromptedbyaseriesofunfortunatecircumstancesincludinganincidentthatresultedinthedeathof2juvenilemountainlionsinthecityofHalfMoonBay.Thisincident,coupledwithahistoryofsimilarsituations,resultedinlegislativechangesrequiringCDFWtoconsiderutilizingtheexpertiseofnon‐agencypersonnel(localveterinarians,universityresearchers,wildliferehabilitators,andNGO’s)andrecommendedtheuseofnon‐lethalmeasuresasaninitialsteptoresolvinghuman‐mountainlionconflicts.Theselegislativerequirementswereincorporatedintothenewpolicy,whichhasbeenineffectsinceJanuary,2013,andwearedevelopingcoordinated‘regionalresponseteams’toassistoureffortswhennecessary.CDFWhasrecentlyallocatedfundingtobegindevelopingastatewideconservationmanagementprogram.Thisprogramwillbehighlycollaborativeandinvolvediversestakeholderstohelpdefineconservation,managementandresearchprioritiesthroughoutthestate.Thiseffortwillalsoevaluateusinghabitatsuitabilitymodelsandresourceselectionfunctionscoupledwithpopulationgeneticstodevelopregionalizedpopulationmonitoringprioritiesforassessingthestate’smountainlionpopulation.
Page 30
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
29
AlbertaCougarManagementJayHoneyman,AlbertaEnvironmentandSustainableResourceDevelopmentAbstract:CougarpopulationsinAlbertahadundergonesignificantdeclineandrangecontractionasaresultofpreydeclineanddirectpersecutionoverthelastcentury.Morerecently,fromthetimetheywerefirstdeclaredabiggamespeciesin1971,cougarpopulationshaveincreasedinnumbersandexpandedindistribution.Cougarmanagementhasbeenadjustedthroughthe1900’sand2000’storeflectthegrowingpopulation,withnewhuntingareasandseasonsaddedascougarscontinuetoexpandtheirrange.In2014,cougarmanagementinAlbertareflectsaneedtobalancecougarconservationwithstrongpublicsentimentthatopposesthepresenceofcougarsinruralresidentialandagriculturallandscapes.ToreadAlberta’scougarmanagementplangoto:http://esrd.alberta.ca/fish‐wildlife/wildlife‐management/documents/WildlifeMgmtPlan‐Cougars‐Nov2012B.pdfNebraskaMountainLionStatusReportSamWilson,NebraskaGameandParksCommission;[email protected] :MountainlionswereextirpatedfromNebraskabytheearly1900sduetounregulatedhunting,trapping,poisoninganddecimationofpreyspecies.In1991afemalewaslegallyshotinthePineRidgeregionofnorthwesternNebraskamarkingthefirstdocumentedpresenceinmoderntimes.Afemalemountainlionwithkittenswasdocumentedinthisregionin2007,whichprovidedthefirstevidenceofaresidentpopulationsinceextirpation.RecentevidenceofreproductionandresidentanimalssuggestsmountainlionsarealsorecolonizingtheWildcatHillsinthesouthernpanhandleandtheNiobraraRivervalleyinnorth‐centralNebraska.TheCommissioninitiatedgeneticsurveysutilizingscatdetectordogsin2010toestimatethesizeofthemountainlionpopulationinthePineRidge.TheamountofsuitablehabitatwasalsoestimatedusingGISbasedhabitatmodeling.Thegeneticsurveywasrepeatedduring2012.Nebraska’sinauguralmountainlionharvestseasonopenedonJan1,2014.Thestateisdividedintofourunits:1)thePineRidgeunit–whichencompassesthelargestknownpopulation,2and3)theUpperPlatteandKeyaPahaunits–whichencompassthetwonewlydocumentedpopulations,and4)thePrairieunit–whichconsistsof87%ofthestatewherenopopulationshavebeendocumentedandhabitatmaybelimited.HuntinginthePineRidgeunitresultedinaharvestoftwomalesandonefemale.ThePrairieunitremainsopenyear‐roundandthereisnoharvestlimit.Noharvestisallowedduring2014intheUpperPlatteandKeyaPahaunits.Additionalresearchisplannedfor2014and2015inordertocreatepopulationestimatesforthePineRidgeandtherecentlyrecolonizedareas.
Page 31
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
30
NewMexicoCougarManagementUpdate2014EliseJ.Goldstein,NewMexicoDepartmentofGameandFish,1WildlifeWay,Santa
Fe,NM87507;[email protected] ,NewMexicoDepartmentofGameandFish,1WildlifeWay,Santa
Fe,NM87507Abstract:Cougars(Pumaconcolor)becameaprotectedspeciesinNewMexicoin1971,andhuntingmanagementwasbasedonazonemanagementsystemstartingin2000.Habitatmodellingestimatesacougarpopulationof3,100to4,300individuals.Thereare19managementzones,11aremanagedforincreasingpopulations,and8aremanagedforstabletodecreasingpopulations.Forincreasingpopulations,totalharvestcannotexceed25%ofthepopulation,withfemaleharvestnottoexceed30%ofthetotalharvest.Forstabletodecreasingpopulation,totalharvestcannotexceed30%ofthepopulation,withfemaleharvestnottoexceed50%ofthetotalharvest.Currently,onlysportharvestcountstowardsthemaximumsustainableharvestlimit.From2010‐2013,40%oftotalharvestwasfemales,≥50%offemalesharvestedwere<2.5yearsold,andtheaverageannualtotalharvestwas215animals.Annually,4‐7%ofthecougarpopulationiskilledfromallsourcesofhuman‐causedmortality.
Desertbighornsheep(Oviscanadensis)werelistedasastateendangeredspeciesin1980,andinthe1990sitwasdocumentedthat85%ofknowncausemoralitywascausedbycougarpredation.From1979to2001,249bighornweretransplantedintothewild,andfrom2002‐2013231bighornweretransplantedintothewild.In2001,acougarremovaleffortwasimplementedindesertbighornhabitatinNewMexico;theareaconstitutes~1%ofcougarhabitat,andanaverageof2.6cougarspermountainrangeperyearisremovedunderthisprogram.Cougarpredationmortalityratesfordesertbighorndeclinedfrom0.16priortocougarremovalto0.06followingcougarremoval.Allothercausesofmortalityremainedfairlyconstantat0.05priortocougarremovaland0.06followingcougarremoval.Thisdemonstratesthatcougarpredationisanadditivesourceofmortalityfordesertbighorn.Desertbighornincreasedfrom<170animalsin2001toapproximately800in2013.Whenhighcougarpredationratesarelimitingbighornpopulations,acougarremovalprogrammayallowbighornpopulationstoexpand.
Page 32
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
31
ACausetoPauseinMontana,Again–What’s‐upwithMontanaMountainLions?2011‐2014JimWilliams,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;USA,[email protected] :Montanaisintheprocessofdedicatingresourcestocreateanewstatewidemountainlionmanagementplan.Wearecurrentlyoperatingunderaplanthatwaswrittenin1996.TheJournal;ofWildlifeManagementhastentativelyacceptedanewmonographtitled“LinkingResourceSelectionandMortalityModelingforPopulationEstimationofMountainLionsinMontana”.ThisstatewideresearcheffortwillhelprefineharvestMontanamanagementgoals.Morespecifically,intheBitterrootValleyofwestcentralMontana,mountainliondensityestimatesarebeingproducedbycurrentresearcheffortsthatchallengetraditionaldensityparadigms.Lastly,ecologicaldiscussionsfromthelastWAFWAworkshopwereincorporatedintosomeregionalMontanamountainlionhuntingseasonstructures.ArizonaGameandFishReportAprilHoward,ArizonaGameandFishDepartmentAbstract:Researchhasshownthatpredationbymountainlionscanlimitbighornsheeppopulationsandimpederestorationeffortsorinducepopulationdecline.AftermountainlionscolonizedsouthwesternArizonaintheearly2000’s,bighornsheeppopulationsinthatareadeclinedby50%.In2013,atranslocationof31bighornsheepintosoutheasternArizona,whichoncecontainedarobustandindigenouspopulationofdesertbighornsheep,werequicklyreducedto14within4months.Afteranalysesoftheprobablecausesofthesheepdeclineinbothareas,predationbymountainlionswasidentifiedasonefactorthatcouldpotentiallybelimitingtherecoveryofthebighornsheeppopulations.ArizonaimplementedAdaptiveMountainLionPredationManagementPlansforeachsite.AnimportantcomponentofeachPlanistouseresearchandmonitoringapproachestoincreaseknowledgeandtoevaluatemanagementactionsacrossabroaderareaoftheselowerdeserthabitats.Althoughitisprematuretoformanyconclusions,currentinformationcollectedfromcollaredsheepandmountainlions,andsurveydataareusedtoimplementandevaluatemanagementstrategiessuchas“offending“lionremoval,multiplebaglimits,andmountainlionmanagementzones.
Page 33
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
32
EvolutionofmountainlionmanagementinNorthDakota,2011‐2014StephanieTucker,NorthDakotaGameandFishDepartment,Bismarck;
[email protected] :ManagementofmountainlionsinNorthDakotafocusedonhumanconflictsandharvestmanagementduringthepast3years.Alsoduringthistime,thefirstactiveresearchprojectonmountainlionsinNorthDakotabegan.Thisfirstphaseofresearchconcentratedonadultmountainlionsurvivalandfoodhabitsasascientificcomparisontolandownerandhunterconcerns.Landownertoleranceformountainlionsremainslow.Additionally,mountainlionscontinuetobeascapegoatforlowmuledeernumbers.Anupcomingsecondphaseofresearchwillattempttoverifyourpopulationandhabitatmodels,sothatarealisticlevelofcertaintycanbeachievedtoaidinharvestmanagement.ThesmallpopulationsizeofmountainlionsinNorthDakotaaddschallengestothespecies’management.
Page 34
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
33
PlenarySession2:KeynoteAbigcatinasmallbody:DoEurasianlynxhavewhatittakestosurvivetheAnthropocene?Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch,Trondheim,NorwayAbstract: Thereiscurrentlyahugefocusontheglobalstatusoflargecarnivores,withsomespeciessuchastigers,snowleopards,cheetahandAfricanlionsattractingmostattention.Althoughthereisnodoubtthatthesespeciesareinneedofallthehelptheycanget,thedominanceofthesespeciesinthepublic’seyedetractsfromthemorecomplexsituationsfacingotherspecies.Theseincludespecieslikemountainlions,leopardsandEurasianlynx.Thesespeciesarewidespreadandhavehighlyvariablestatus.Populationsvaryfromlarge,wellconnectedandexpanding,tosmall,isolatedandhighlyendangered.ThistalkfocusesontheEurasianlynx,exploringwhatweknow,anddon’tknow,aboutitsecologyandconservationstatusacrossitswidedistributionthatstretchesacrossEurasia.Thetalkwilladdressdetailsofitsecologyandmanagement,especiallyfocusingonissueswithparallelstomountainlions–includingcompetitionwithhuntersforwildungulates,depredationonlivestock,monitoringandhunterharvest.ThetalkwillsummarizewhatisknownfromthemanystudysitesinEuropewhereithasbeenwellstudied–butwillalsoprofilejusthowmuchisunknownaboutitsstatusandecologyacrossthemajorityofitsrangeinAsia.
JohnLinnelldiscusseslynxecology.
Page 35
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
34
Session3:
FelidEcology,Conservation,andPopulations,
Part1
AshwinNaidutalksaboutbarriersandgeneflow.
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 36
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
35
PotentialbarriersrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsinArizona.AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,Universityof
Arizona;[email protected] ,InstitutfürPopulationsgenetik,VeterinärmedizinischeUniversität
Wien,Vienna,Austria,[email protected] ,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolof
NaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected] .
Abstract:Weinvestigatedthepopulationgeneticstructureofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inArizonafromhunter‐harvestedtissueandscatsamplescollectedduring2008‐2012.Ourgoalwastoexaminewhatgeographicfeatures(e.g.interstatehighways,theColoradoRiver,theGrandCanyon)arepotentiallyrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsinthestate.Wegenotyped466DNAsamplesfor10well‐knownFeliscatusmicrosatelliteDNAmarkers,andwith“PumaPlex”–apanelof26singlenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs)recentlydevelopedforpopulationgeneticstudiesonmountainlions.Wefoundthehigheststatisticalsupportforfoursub‐populationsofmountainlionsinArizona.Geographicvisualizationofthesesub‐populationssuggestedthatInterstatehighways(particularlyInterstate‐10westofPhoenix,Interstate‐17andInterstate‐40)andthelowerColoradoRivermightberestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlions.Tocorroborategeneticdataonmountainlionpopulationsubstructureandconnectivity,wearecurrentlycreatingaGIS‐basedhabitatsuitabilitymodelformountainlionsthatwillprovideuswiththepotentialcorridorsformountainlionmovementacrossthesebarriers.Datageneratedfromthisstudywillbeusefulforwildlifemanagers,stakeholders,andconservationplannersinmakingregionalorstatewidemanagementdecisionsformountainlions,designatingwildlifecorridorareas,andfacilitatingcollaborativeresearchbetweenindividuals,laboratoriesandagencies.
Page 37
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
36
Theimportanceofscaleandbehavioralstateinpumaresourceselectionfunctions.KathyA.Zeller,DepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,Universityof
Massachusetts,Amherst;[email protected]
KevinMcGarigal,DepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,UniversityofMassachusetts;[email protected]
PaulBeier,SchoolofForestry,NorthernArizonaUniversity,Flagstaff;[email protected]
SamuelCushman,U.S.ForestServiceRockyMountainResearchStation,Flagstaff;[email protected]
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCaliforniaDavis;[email protected]
WalterM.Boyce,WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCaliforniaDavis;[email protected]
Abstract:Pumahabitatrelationshipsaretypicallyestimatedwithresourceselectionfunctions(RSFs),whicharebasedonapaired‘used’/’available’design.ManypumaRSFsusetheareaofthehomerange,orlarger,fortheavailableextent.Additionally,mostRSFsusealldatapointsforanalysis,regardlessofthebehavioralstateofanindividual.Wewereinterestedinexaminingselectionatfinerscalesandfordifferentbehavioralstates.GPStelemetrydatacollectedat5‐minutefixintervalsfrompumasinsouthernCaliforniawereusedinapairedused/availabledesigntoexplorethesensitivityofRSFstotheextent,orscale,ofavailablehabitatandtothebehavioralstateofindividuals.Weexamined37scalesofavailablehabitat,from250mto10,000m,andtwobehavioralstates,resourceuseandmovement.Acrossthefullfactorialofscalesandbehavioralstates,wecomparedparameterestimatestodeterminethestrengthofselection,andmodelperformancetoassesspredictiveability.RSFsweresensitivetothescaleofavailablehabitat.Multiplecharacteristicscaleswerefoundacrossourpredictorvariables,indicatingthatpumasinthestudyareaarerespondingatdifferentscalestodifferentlandscapefeaturesandthatmulti‐scalemodelsmaybemoreappropriate.Acrossbehavioralstates,pumasrespondtograsslands,coastaloakwoodlandsandcoastalscrubatfinescales,andurbanandagricultureatcoarsescales.RSFswerealsosensitivetobehavioralstate;specifically,pumasengagedinresourceusebehaviorhadanoppositeselectionresponsetosomelandcovertypesthanpumasengagedinmovementbehavior.Allmodelsperformedwell,withcoarserscaleandmulti‐scalemodelsoutperformingfine‐scalemodelsandresourceusemodelsgenerallyoutperformingmovementmodels.OurresultsindicatethatmultiplescalesofselectionandbehavioralstatesshouldbeexaminedinpumaRSFs,especiallywhenresultswillbeusedformanagementpurposes.
Page 38
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
37
California’scougarconnectivity:geneticsinformingconservationandmanagementHollyB.Ernest.WildlifeHealthCenterandVeterinaryGeneticsLaboratory,School
ofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
T.WinstonVickers.WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
WalterM.Boyce.WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis
SethP.D.Riley.NationalParkService‐SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,ThousandOaks,CA
ChristopherC.Wilmers.EnvironmentalStudiesDivision,UCSantaCruzAbstract:Mountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inCalifornialiveamongsthabitatmosaicsspanningarangebetweenextremesofurbanizedfragmentedcoastalenvironmentsandvastmontanewildlandsinthenorthstateandinland.CoastregionsextendingbetweenSanFrancisco,LosAngeles,andSanDiegohaveburgeoninghumanpopulationswhiletheNorthCoastRange,SierraNevada,andModocPlateauencompassvastsectionsofintactpumahabitatlessimpactedbyhumandevelopments.InordertoassesspopulationconnectivityandgenetichealthofCaliforniamountainlionsacrosstheseextremes,weconductedadetailedappraisalofthegeneticdiversity,relatedness,andpopulationstructureofCaliforniapumapopulationsusing354samplesanda46‐locusmicrosatelliteDNApanel.Thisstudyfollowsuponworkconductedtenyearsagoandemploysanexpandedgenetictoolsetandlargercoastregionsamplesize.Weevaluatedandcomparedlevelsofgeneticdiversity,inbreeding,relatedness,effectivepopulationsizes,andtestedwhethergeneticdatasupportedhypothesesofrecentbottlenecksinkeypopulationsincludingtheSantaCruzMountains(n=78),SantaMonicaMountains(n=26),SantaAnaMountains(n=42)andadjacentPeninsularRanges(N=55).WefoundthatcoastpopulationsnearlargeurbancentershadmuchlowergeneticdiversitythaninlandpopulationssuchasthoseinSierraNevada.Specificinstancesofrepeatedinbreedingandsignsofpotentialgeneticdefectsweredetected.ThesefindingsraisemajorconcernsaboutthecurrentstatusofCaliforniacoastalmountainlionpopulations,andthelonger‐termoutlookforpumasinsouthernandcentralcoastalCalifornia.Inparticular,thefindinghighlighttheurgencytomaintain–andenhance–whatconnectivityremainsforpumas(andpresumablynumerousotherspecies)acrosshumanbarriersincludingmultilanehighwaysanddevelopments.Wearehopefulthatthesenewgeneticresults,coupledwiththedemographicfindings,willmotivategreaterconservationfocusandeffectiveoutcomes.
Page 39
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
38
Populationgeneticsofasmall,isolatedpopulationofmountainlions:Barriers,inbreeding,andgeneticrescue.SethP.D.Riley,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,NationalPark
Service,401W.HillcrestDr.,ThousandOaks,CA91360,USA,[email protected]
JohnPollinger,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,621CharlesE.YoungDriveSouth,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐1606,USA,[email protected] .
LaurelSerieys,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,HersheyHallBox957246,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐7246,USA,[email protected] .
JeffreyA.Sikich,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,NationalParkService,401W.HillcrestDr.,ThousandOaks,CA91360,USA,[email protected] .
LisaDalbeck,WildlifeGenetics,GenomicsandPopulationHealth,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,OneShieldsAvenue,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,CA,95616,USA,[email protected] .
RobertK.Wayne,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,621CharlesE.YoungDriveSouth,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐1606,USA,[email protected] .
HollyB.Ernest,WildlifeGenetics,GenomicsandPopulationHealth,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,OneShieldsAvenue,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,CA,95616,USA,[email protected] .
Abstract:Mountainlionspersistnaturallyatlowdensitiesandcanbeparticularlysensitivetotheeffectsofhabitatlossandfragmentation,includinggeneticeffectssuchasinbreedingandthelossofgeneticdiversity.TheSantaMonicaMountains,northwestofLosAngelesarea,arecompletelyisolatedfromotherlargenaturalareasbyurbandevelopmentandlargefreeways,specificallythe101Freewaytothenorth.LocationsofGPSradio‐collaredmountainlionsindicatethatthesefreewaysareasignificantbarriertomountainlionmovement.Toevaluatetheeffectsofthesebarriersinmoredetail,wegenotyped26lionscapturedaspartofalong‐termNationalParkServicestudy,aswellas16otherlionsintheareaat54microsatelliteloci.MountainlionsintheSantaMonicaMountainshadsignificantlylowergeneticdiversitythanthosenorthofthefreewayasmeasuredbyexpectedheterozygosityandnumbersofalleles.Morebroadly,thissmallpopulationalsoexhibitedthelowestlevelsofgeneticdiversitythathavebeenreportedbothinCaliforniaandthroughoutthewest.Basedonpedigreeconstructionandgene‐dropanalysis,individualmalemountainlionscanhaveveryhighreproductivesuccessanddominatethegenepoolofthispopulation.Becauseofourdetailedknowledgeofthissmallpopulation,wewereabletodocumentthatindividualeventssignificantlyaffecteditspopulationgenetics.Specifically,ayoungmale(P12)immigratedintothepopulationfromnorthofthe101Freeway,Hepossessed20allelesthatwerenot
Page 40
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
39
previouslypresentintheSantaMonicaMountainspopulation,19ofwhichhepassedontohisoffspring,increasingthepopulation‐leveldiversity.However,wealsodocumentedmultipleinstancesofclose‐inbreeding,specificallybetweenfathersanddaughters,somethingthathasrarelybeenreportedinthisspeciesandwhichhadmeasurablynegativeeffectsongeneticdiversity.Currently,connectivitybetweentheSantaMonicaMountainsandothernaturalareastotheNorthisverylimited;maintainingandenhancingconnectivitywillbecriticalforthelong‐termdemographicandgenetichealthofmountainlionpopulationsinthisandotherfragmentedlandscapes.
SethRileydiscussesmountainlionpopulationgenetics.
Page 41
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
40
Session4:
FelidEcology,Conservation,andPopulations,
Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 42
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
41
Homerangecharacteristicsofasubordinatepredator:selectionforrefugiaorpreyavailability?PatrickE.Lendrum,Panthera,NewYork;[email protected]
L.MarkElbroch,Panthera;[email protected]
HowardQuigley,Panthera;[email protected]
DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingDepartmentofGameandFish;[email protected]
MichaelJimenez,UnitedStatesFishandWildlifeService,Jackson,Wyoming;[email protected]
DerekCraighead,CraigheadBeringiaSouth;[email protected]
Abstract:Cougars(Pumaconcolor)aredescribedas“habitatgeneralists”,butlittleisknownaboutwhichecologicalfactorsdrivetheirhomerangeselection,particularlyinthepresenceofdominantcompetitors(i.e.wolves,Canislupus).WetrackedcougarsusingVHF(2001to2005)andGPS(2006to2011)technologyintheSouthernYellowstoneEcosystem(SYE)innorthwesternWyoming,USA.Wetestedwhetherdatatype(VHFvs.GPS),cougarsex,accesstoforests(refugia),orpreyavailabilityexplainedthesizeof50%and95%kerneldensityestimator(KDE)homeranges.Second,wequantifiedattributesofcougarhomerangesandtestedwhethertheyweredifferentfromattributesoftheoverallstudyarea,toaddresstheecologicalquestion:Docougarsselecthomerangesbasedontheavailabilityofrefugia,preyavailability,orsomecombinationofthetwo?Cougarsexanddatatypeprovedsignificantpredictorsofhomerangesizeforboth95%and50%KDEs,andtheamountofforestpartlyexplainedthesizeof50%KDEs.CougarhomerangesderivedfromVHFdatawere1.4‐1.9timeslargerthanhomerangesderivedfromGPSdata,however,homerangeattributesdeterminedfromVHFandGPSdatawereremarkablyequivalent.Femalecougarsselectedhomerangeswithhigherhuntopportunitythanmales,andhigherthanexpectedwhencomparedtothemeanvalueofthestudyarea,supportingthelong‐standingassumptionthatfemalesprimarilyselecthomerangeswithsuitablepreytosustainthemselvesandtheirdependentyoung.Allcougarsselectedhomerangesfurtherfromknownwolfpacks,providingevidencefornewlyestablishedcompetitionbetweenresidentcougarsandrecolonizingwolves,butdidnotselecthomerangeswithgreateraccesstolandscaperefugia.OurresultsprovidedevidencethatcougarsintheSYEselecthomerangesthatprovidehighpreyavailabilityandaspatialbufferthatmitigatespotentialconflictswithadominantcompetitor.
Page 43
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
42
GeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.RebecaL.Juarez,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaState
University;[email protected]
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
MichaelK.Schwartz,USDAForestService,RockyMountainResearchStationKristyP.Pilgrim,USDAForestService,RockyMountainResearchStation,MissoulaDanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
Abstract:Assessinggeneticstructureofgamespeciespopulations,suchascougars(Pumaconcolor),providesknowledgeofpopulationdemographicsandisvitalforlong‐termmanagement.Havingre‐populatedtheBlackHillsby1998,thecougarpopulationreachedsaturationin2005,promptinganinitiationofaharvestseasonbySouthDakotaDepartmentofGame,FishandParks.IncreasingharvestquotasinconjunctionwiththerelativeisolationoftheBlackHillsmaydeterconnectivityandacttodecreaselong‐termviability.OurobjectivesweretoassessgeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota,measureeffectivepopulationsize(Ne),andcompareresultswiththosefoundbeforeaharvestseasonhadbeenimplementedusing20microsatelliteloci.WealsocomparedgeneticstructureandconductedpopulationassignmenttestswiththeneighboringcougarpopulationsinWyomingandNorthDakota.Weconductedgeneticanalysison712DNAsamplesfromcougarsintheBlackHillscollectedfrom2003‐2013.Capturedanimalswerefittedwithradio‐collarsandeartagged.Blood/tissuesampleswerecollectedfromallradio‐collaredandharvestedindividuals,aswellasnon‐harvestrelatedmortalities.GeneticanalysiswasmeasuredusingGenAlEx,HP‐Rare,ONeSAMP,andSTRUCTURE.Pre‐harvestgeneticanalysisfoundanexpectedheterozygosity(HE)of0.55,observedheterozygosity(HO)of0.55,andeffectivepopulationsizeof27.9(23‐39;95%CL).Incomparison,wedeterminedthatcougarsinSouthDakotapostinitiationofharvesthadanaverageexpectedheterozygosity(HE)of0.56,andanaverageobservedheterozygosity(HO)of0.55.EffectivepopulationsizeofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakotawas28.4individuals(23‐37;95%CL).WewereabletosuccessfullyassigncougarsfromSouthDakota,NorthDakota,andWyomingintoseparatepopulations.GeneticvariabilityofcougarsintheBlackHillsremainsstable,possiblyasaresultofemigrationandimmigration.ContinuedgeneticassessmentofcougarsinSouthDakotaisrecommended.
Page 44
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
43
IntegratingResourceSelectionandHarvestintoSpatialCapture‐RecaptureModelsforestimatingmountainlionabundance.KellyM.Proffitt,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;[email protected]
MarkHebblewhite,UniversityofMontana,WildlifeBiologyProgram,Missoula;[email protected] .
JoshuaGoldberg,UniversityofMontana,CollegeofForestryandConservation,Missoula;[email protected] .
MikeThompson,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;[email protected] .
BenJimenez,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;[email protected] .
RobinRussell,USGS,NationalWildlifeHealthCenterMadison;[email protected] .
Abstract:ThelackofrigorousmountainlionabundanceestimateshascontributedtomakingmountainlionmanagementoneofthemostcontentiouswildlifeissuesinwesternMontana.Recentadvancesinspatialcapturerecapture(SCR)modelshaveprovidednewapproachesforaddressingthisimportantneedandprovidinganobjectivebasisformountainlionmanagement.WedevelopedextensionstostandardSCRmodelstoincorporatesimultaneouslivesamplingandharvesteventsandhabitatqualityinformation.WedemonstratetheuseofthesenovelmethodsinestimatingmountainlionabundanceanddensityintwomountainlionmanagementunitsinwesternMontana,huntingdistricts250and270.WeidentifiedindividualsthroughDNAsamplescollectedby1)biopsydartingtreedmountainlionslocatedduringsystematicsurveys,2)opportunisticallycollectinghairandscatsamples,and3)samplingallharvestedmountainlions.Weincluded80DNAsamplescollectedfrom62independentindividualsintheanalysis.Weestimatedtheabundanceof85(95%CI=54,141)independentmountainlionsinhuntingdistrict250and82(95%CI=51,137)inhuntingdistrict270.Theseresultsare2‐3timeshigherthanpreviouslyestimatedminimummountainlionabundancesinthisarea,andcorrespondtodensityestimatesof4.6and5.4lionsper100km2.BecausecurrentharvestregulationsinwesternMontanaweredevelopedundertheassumptionoflowerpopulationabundance,lionmanagementobjectivesareunlikelytobemetunlessharvestprescriptionsareadjustedtoaccountforthisnewunderstandingoflionpopulationstatus.Morebroadly,theanalyticimprovementsinSCRmethodswillenhancetheabilityofwildlifemanagerstoreliablyandeconomicallyestimateabundanceofmountainlions,aswellasotherlargecarnivores.
Page 45
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
44
EvaluationofharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinUtah:Oquirrh‐StansburyandMonroeunitsascasestudies.MichaelL.Wolfe,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;
[email protected]
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices,Logan;[email protected]
PatTerletzky,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;[email protected]
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;[email protected]
LiseM.Aubry,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:WepresentdemographicestimatesfromtwocougarpopulationsinUtahthathavebeenintensivelymonitoredfor17years,andcomparethesedemographicratestoharveststatisticsprovidedbytheUtahDivisionofWildlifeResources(UDWR)coveringthelengthofthestudyperiod.WequantifytherelationshipbetweenharvestindicesandestimateddemographicratesfortheMonroeandtheOquirrh‐Stansburymanagementunits,respectively.ThefirstisahuntedpopulationintheMonroeMountains,aremotelocationinsouth‐centralUtah;andthesecondisasemi‐protectedpopulationintheOquirrhMountains,ontheperipheryofSaltLakeCity.OuroverallobjectivewastoassesstherelationshipsbetweentheharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinboththeOquirrh‐StansburyandMonroewildlifemanagementunitsandprovidetheUDWRwithrecommendationstohelpcalibratecurrentlyusedindicestoactualpopulationdynamics.BecausetheOquirrh‐Stansbury(i.e.,whereanthropogenicsourcesofmortality,otherthanharvest,arepredominant)andMonroemanagementunits(i.e.,whereharvestisthemaincauseofmortality)aresubjectedtocontrastingmortalityregimes,resultsprovidedbythisstudycouldbeexpandedtoothermanagementunitsthatexhibitsimilarcharacteristicstotheunitsdescribedhere.
Page 46
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
45
SurvivalratesofcougarsinOregonfrom1989–2011:aretrospectiveanalysisDarrenA.Clark,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,Corvallis;
[email protected]
BruceK.Johnson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected] .
DeWaineH.Jackson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected] .
MarkHenjum,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
ScottL.Findholt,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected] .
JamesJ.Akenson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
RobertG.Anthony,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,Corvallis
Abstract:Weconductedaretrospectiveanalysisofsurvivalandcausesofmortalityof222radiocollaredcougars(Pumaconcolor)in3lightlyhuntedcougarpopulationsinOregonfrom1989–2011.Twostudies[CatherineCreek(1989–1996)andJacksonCreek(1993–2002)]overlappedthepassageofMeasure18in1994,whichprohibitedtheuseofdogstohuntcougars,buttheWenaha‐SledSprings‐Mt.Emily(WSM)didnot(2002–2011).HuntingmortalitywasthemostcommoncauseofdeathatCatherineCreekandWSM.Incontrast,naturalmortalitywasmostcommonatJacksonCreek.AnnualsurvivalratesofadultmaleswerelowestatCatherineCreekpre‐Measure18(0.57)andincreasedpost‐Measure18(0.86),similartothoseratesobservedatJacksonCreek(0.78)andWSM(0.82).Sub‐adultmalesurvivalincreasedpre‐Measure18(0.57)topost‐Measure18(0.86)atCatherineCreek,whichwasgreaterthansurvivalratesobservedatJacksonCreek(0.60)andWSM(0.45).Regardlessofhuntingregulations,annualsurvivalratesofadultandsub‐adultfemalesweresimilaramongstudyareas(0.85–0.89).WeobservedaneffectageonannualsurvivalatbothJacksonCreekandWSM,whereyoung(1–3years)maleshadlowersurvivalthanyoungfemales,butsurvivalofmalesandfemalesweresimilarbyage4or5years.Survivalofbothgendersdeclinedatolderages(6+years)atWSMbutnotJacksonCreek.WedidnotobserveaneffectofageonsurvivalatCatherineCreek.Ourresultsindicatedsourcesofmortalityvariedwithinjurisdictions,evenifmanagementpracticesweresimilar.Huntingcougarswithdogsloweredofadultmalescomparedtoareaswherecougarsarehuntedwithoutdogs.Theeffectofincreasingageoncougarsurvivalshouldbeconsideredwhenusingsurvivalratestoestimatepopulationgrowthrates.
Page 47
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
46
UsingDNAtoevaluatefieldidentificationofcougargenderbyagencystaffandhuntersusingtraineddogs
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,3515State Highway97A,Wenatchee,WA,[email protected]
Abstract:Cougarhuntinghastypicallybeenclassifiedaseitherselective‐huntingwiththeaidofdogsornon‐selective‐huntingwithoutdogs,basedontheassumptionthathuntersusingdogscanbetteridentifygenderofcougarspriortoharvest.Subsequenttohuntactivity,94%ofallwildlifeagenciesthatallowcougarhuntinghavemandatoryinspectionswheregenderisidentifiedandrecordedbyagencystaff.TotesttheabilityofhuntersandagencystaffinWashingtontocorrectlyidentifygenderofcougarsinthefieldduringhuntingseasonsandinspectionofmortalities,respectively,thisprojectusedDNAanalysisoftissuesamplescollectedwithbiopsydartsandduringinspection.ThegenderassignedbydoghuntersinthefieldmatchedgenderfromDNAanalysis70%ofthetime(n=159);correctidentificationvariedbetween57and88%peryear.ThegenderidentifiedbyagencystaffduringinspectionofmortalitiesmatchedDNAanalysis85%ofthetime(n=1,331);correctidentificationvariedbetween71and90%peryear.Becausegendermisclassificationhasthepotentialtoalterintendedhunterharvestaswellashowsuccessofmanagementprescriptionsareinterpreted,agenciesmaywanttoinitiateinternalandhuntereducationprograms.Sincethemajorityalreadyhavemandatoryinspections,agenciesmayalsowanttoconsiderDNAcollectionduringmandatoryinspectionstoidentifyerrorratesofgenderidentificationbystaffwithintheirjurisdiction.Finally,consideringthesizeofcougarmanagementunitsinjurisdictionscanbeavaluablewayforagenciestopreventcomplicationsofpotentialgendermisidentification.
Page 48
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
47
Session5:
Posters
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 49
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
48
OrphanedkittensinWashingtonresultinadecadeofnationwidecougareducation
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,[email protected]
Abstract:Between2002and2012,26orphancougar(Pumaconcolor)cubshavebeenreportedtoWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife(WDFW),capturedbystaff,andplacedwithfacilitiesaccreditedbytheAssociationofZoosandAquariums(AZA)throughouttheU.S.Inadditiontoover15millionvisitorsperyearatthesefacilities,innumerabletelevisionandnewsprintstorieshavecoveredthecapture,transport,andarrivaloftheseanimals,thusreachingouttocountlessmillionsmorepeople.Thishasnotonlyresultedinhighqualitycougareducationprogramsbenefitingpeoplewhomayneverhavethechancetoseeacougarinthewild,butalsobroughtprominentnationalattentiontoWDFW.Theprocessofresponding,capturing,andprovidingcareuntilarrangementsarefinalized,andtransportinganimalsrequiresorganization,commitment,andonoccasionpersonaldonationsoftimeandmoney.Inalmostallcases,orphanedcougarkittensarereportedtoWDFWbyamemberofthepublicconcernedthattheanimalswillnotsurviveontheirown.Manytimes,thereportsaregivenwithoutthereportingpartyknowingthespecifics;onlythatthekittenshavebeenseenwithoutanadult.Ifit’sthefirstsighting,andwedonothavebackgroundknowledge,weaskthattheyleavetheanimalsaloneandkeepusinformeddaily;thisavoidsremovingkittensthatarenotorphanedandlefttemporarilywhiletheadultfemaleishuntingforfood.Asadditionalinformationisobtained,andwearecertaintheadultisnolongerpresent,aresponseisinitiated.Inadditiontousingseveraltypesofboxtraps,kittenshavebeencapturedusingWDFW’sKarelianBearDogs(treeingkittens),andbyhandonseveraloccasions.Oncecaptured,allkittensaretestedforFeLV/FIV,transportedtoaveterinarianandgivenathoroughexamination,careisadministeredifneeded,andbiologicalmeasurementsaregatheredandrecorded.Healthcertificatesandimportpermitsarethenobtainedtofacilitatetransfer.Manytimes,kittensneedtotravelbyaircrafttotheirfinaldestination.Regulationsrequireanabsorbentmaterialbeusedasabaselayerinthetransportcrate,windowsanddoorsaresecurelycoveredwithbreathableburlap,doorsaresecurelylocked,andfoodandwaterisprovided.Flightsarealmostalwaysdirecttothedestinationtolimittimeinthecrate.Asmuchaspossible,wekeepthereportingpartyinvolvedthroughouttheprocess;thishadresultedinrespect,credibility,andmuchappreciation.WeacknowledgetheassistanceofMichelleSchireman,NorthAmericaSectionAZAFelidTAGPumaPopulationManager&RegionalStudbookKeeper,whohasbeenaninvaluablecollaboratorinplacingtheseanimals,andtheAZAorganizationsthroughouttheU.S.thathaveprovidedaplacefortheseanimalstobecomeambassadorsforthespecies.Pleasecomebyandseethisdescriptiveposterandlearnmoreaboutthisprocessduringthepostersession.
Page 50
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
49
ForagingpatternsofcougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana
LinseyW.Blake,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;[email protected]
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices,Logan;[email protected]
Abstract:Theimpactofcougarpredationontheirpreyspeciesvariesregionally.Todocumenttherelationshipsbetweencougarpredationandthebighornsheep,muledeer,andferalhorsepopulationsoftheBighornNationalRecreationAreaandthePryorMountains,wedeployedGPScollarson6cougarsandvisitedtheirlocationclusterstodeterminetheirkillratesandforagingpatterns.Weexaminedthepreycompositionoftheirkills(n=200)byspecies,muledeersexandageclasses,preysizeclasses,aswellasthesexorsocialclassofthecougar.Weexaminedselectionrelativetoungulatepopulationcompositionobtainedthroughanaerialsurvey.WefoundmuledeerweretheprimarypreyofcougarsinthePryorMountains,whilebighornsheepandferalhorsesconstitutedsecondarypreyspecies.Whilecougarsselectedforbighornsheep,thiswasallattributabletooneindividualthatspecializedonbighornsheep.Thiscougarpopulationalsoselectedforadultmaleandjuvenilemuledeer.Femalecougarskilledmoredoesandmaleskilledmorebucks.Familygroupshadtheshortesttimeintervalsbetweenkills,whileadultmaleshadthelongest.Werecommendthatmanagerscontinuetoinvestigateoptionstoreducepredationpressuresfromcougarsonthebighornsheeppopulation.Modificationofpredationriskthroughhabitatmanipulationcouldbeconsidered.Managersshouldbeawarethatsmall,isolatedbighornsheeppopulationscanbedifficultandexpensivetomaintain.Inaddition,atthetimeofthisstudy,thecougarpopulationwasnotdepredatinganyferalhorses;thusmanagerswillneedtocontinueactionstoreachtheirmanagementobjectivesofreducingtheferalhorsepopulation.ImprovementsonGPSlocationclusteranalysistechniquesforpredictingfeedingactivities
KevinA.Blecha,GraduateDegreePrograminEcology,ColoradoStateUniversity,FortCollins;[email protected]
MatW.Alldredge,ColoradoParksandWildlife,FortCollins;[email protected]
Abstract:GPSlocationclusteranalysishasbecomeastapletechniqueinlargepredatorfeedingstudies.Wedemonstratethreeimprovementstothemethodbasedonstudydesignandtechnologicaladvancementsinafouryearstudyof4600clusterground‐truthingvisitstoGPSlocationclustersfrom53cougarsubjects:1)
Page 51
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
50
Ground‐truthingpotentialfeedingsiteshavegenerallyreliedoneitherexhaustivelyvisitingallclustersofanindividualsubjectorbyopportunisticnon‐randomsampling.Theformermaybecostprohibitiveandlimitthesamplesizeofanimalsubjects,whilethelattermayleadtobiasedestimatesofkill‐rate/preycomposition.Wedemonstrateastratifiedrandomsamplingschemeformonthlyvisitationperiods,alongwithasampleof“singlepointclusters”consistingofasingleGPSlocation.2)Feedingeventpredictionmodelsusingclassicclusteranalysesarelikelybiasedtowardlargerpreyitems.Wedemonstrateasimpleintegrationofaccelerometersensordataasanadditionalcovariatetohelpimprovepredictionmodels.3)Itissuspectedthattheprobabilityatechniciansuccessfullyclassifiesaclusterwhileground‐truthingdeclinesasthevisitationlag(timedelaybetweentechnicianvisitationandcougarfeedingdate)increases.Directsatellitecommunicationcapabilitiesnowallowreal‐timedownloadingofGPSdata,andthusnearreal‐timeground‐truthing.Wetestedthisonasampleofclusters(n=202)withvisitationbyonetechnician1‐3dayspostinitiationbythecougar,andthenbyasecondindependentblindobserver1‐60dayslater.Thedoubleobserversconcurredinthepresence/absenceoffeedingremainsin98.6%ofthecases,whileconcurringonspeciesidentificationin93.6%.Whileclassificationsuccessofpreyspecies,sex,andagewilllikelydecreaseaspreyremainsdegrade,researchersshouldbeconfidentthatthepresence/absenceclassificationcomponentisrobustforthelogisticallyfeasiblevisitationlagsthatweretested.Trichinellaintwodisjunctpopulationsofpuma
MarcCriffield,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission,Naples;[email protected]
JenniferE.Thomas,OklahomaStateUniversity;[email protected]
KenLogan,ColoradoDivisionofWildlife;[email protected]
MarkCunningham,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;[email protected]
DaveOnorato,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;[email protected]
EdoardoPozio,IstitutoSuperiorediSanità,Rome,Italy;[email protected]
MasonV.Reichard,OklahomaStateUniversity;[email protected] :Trichinellaspp.arezoonoticnematodescommonincarnivoresthroughouttheworld.Theseparasitesareuniquebecausethesameindividualishosttoallstagesofthenematodeandtransmissionisbasedoningestionofinfectedtissues.WedeterminedtheprevalenceofTrichinellaspp.infectionsinFloridapanthers(Pumaconcolorcoryi)andcougar(P.concolorcouguar)fromColorado.Tonguesamplesfrom114pantherand40cougarmortalitieswerecollectedatnecropsyandexaminedbyartificialdigestion.Trichinellaspp.larvaeweredetected
Page 52
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
51
in24(21.1%)panthersand18(45.0%)cougars.OftheseTrichinellasamples,19fromFloridaand9fromColoradoweregenotypedtospecies.FromFlorida,T.pseudospiraliswasdetectedin16,T.spiralisin1,and2pantherswereinfectedwithbothT.pseudospiralisandT.spiralis.FromColorado,T.murrelliwasdetectedin5,T.pseudospiralisin3,and1cougarwasinfectedwithTrichinellagenotypeT6.OurresultsindicatedthatinfectionofTrichinellaiscommonthroughoutdifferentpopulationsofpumasintheU.S.ThisisthefirstreportofTrichinellapseudospiralisinpanthersandcougarsandonlythethirdreportinU.S.wildlife.InfectionofTrichinellaspp.inpumaisusuallysubclinicalandrarelycausesdisease.However,understandingtheepidemiologyofTrichinellaspp.inpumabecomesincreasinglyimportantsinceFloridapanthersareendangeredandcougarsharvestedinColoradoareoftenconsumedbyhumans.ConfirmedmountainlionsinOklahoma
AaronGhaemi,OklahomaDepartmentofWildlifeConservation;[email protected]
Abstract:TheMountainlion(Pumaconcolor)historicallyroamedmuchoftheUnitedStatespriortoearlysettlement.EarliestreportsofmountainlionsinOklahomadatebacktothemid1800’s.Since2002,fourteenmountainlionshavebeenconfirmedinOklahomabytheDepartmentofWildlifeConservation.Confirmationconsistsofphotos,tracks,scat,orotherphysicalevidence.Whenpossible,sexofthelionswasdetermined.Sevenmalesandfourfemaleswereclassified.Threelionswereunclassified.Necropsieswereperformedon3lioncarcassesandallfemalesexaminedtodatehaveshownnoevidenceofreproduction.AsmountainlionpopulationsinthewesternU.S.continuetoexpand,dispersalislikelytocontinueintoOklahoma,bringingtransientlionsseekingnew,uninhabitedterritoriestoestablishhomeranges.Pumaactivityandmesocarnivores
AlexViere,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville;[email protected]
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity;[email protected] :Apexpredatorsmayexerttopdowneffectsonecologicalcommunitiesdirectlybyaffectingtheabundanceanddistributionofherbivoresthroughpredationandpredatoravoidance,orindirectlybyaffectingherbivoresthroughsimilareffectsonmesocarnivores.Ourobjectivewastodeterminewhethertherewasasignificantnegativeassociationbetweenpuma(Pumaconcolor)activityandtheactivityofmesocarnivorescoyote(Canislatrans),bobcat(Lynxrufus),andgrayfox(Urocyoncinereoargenteus)activityasmeasuredbyphotographicrateson
Page 53
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
52
remotecameras.Weusedphotographicdatacollectedfrom18May2008to1June2012from25remotecamerasdistributedatfixedlocationsover100km2insouth‐centralNewMexico.Weloggedatotalof25,475cameranightsandcollected538photosofpuma,892ofcoyote,278ofbobcat,and2,945ofgrayfox.Negativebinomialregressionsrevealedasignificantnegativeassociationbetweenpumaactivityandcoyoteactivity(z=‐14.423;df=25;p<0.0001)andpumaandbobcatactivity(z=‐2.417;df=25;p=0.008).Wealsofoundanegativeassociationbetweenpumaandgrayfoxbutthisrelationshipwasnotstatisticallysignificant(z=‐0.932,df=25,p=0.176).Ourdatasupportthehypothesisthatpumareducethepresencesmallercarnivores.Ifpumadodisplacemesocarnivorestothedegreewehaveobserved,pumamayexertadditionaleffectsonecosystemprocessesquiteapartfromthelargeherbivoremediatedprocesseswithwhichwearemorefamiliar.However,wecannotruleoutthepossibilitythatdifferencesinfinescalehabitatpreferencesamongthesespeciesareresponsibleforthepatternsweobservedinthisstudy.Rigorouscomparisonsbetweenareaswithandwithoutpuma,orbeforeandafterpumaareremoved/added,couldaddressthisambiguity.Effectsofpumasex,season,andhabitattypeondiet
SadiePerrin,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville;[email protected]
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:Ourobjectivewastodeterminewhetherpumasexesrespondeddifferentlytoseasonandhabitattypewithrespecttodiet.FromFebruary26,2008toJune6,2012,weinvestigated392preycaches,representingthedietsof15adultpumatotalacrosstwostudyareasinsouth‐centralNewMexico.Weusedlog‐linearanalysesandpost‐hocChi‐SquaretestsofIndependencetoelucidatetheinteractiveeffectsofseason(cold‐dryversushot‐wet),habitattype(riparianfloodplainonBosquedelApacheNationalWildlifeRefuge(BDA)versuscanyon‐landfoothillsontheLadderRanch(LR)),andpumasexondiet.Wefoundamarginallysignificantsexxhabitattypexpreysizeeffect(G=‐7.661;df=3;p=0.053).BothmaleandfemalepumaatemoresmallandmediumsizedpreyitemsontheBDA.Thispatternwasstatisticallysignificantforfemales(G=58.7;df=2;p<0.001)butnotformales.OntheBDAwefoundamarginallysignificantsexxseasonxpreysizeeffect(G=‐7.1008;df=3;p=0.069).Heremalesandfemalesconsumedmoremediumandsmallpreyinthewarm‐wetseason.Thispatternwasmuchmorepronouncedformales(G=6.875;df=3;p=0.076).OntheLRwefoundasignificantsexxseasonxpreysizeeffect(G=‐11.023;df=3;p=0.012).Femalestendedtoconsumemorelargeandmediumpreyinthewarm‐wetseasonwhereasmalesconsumedmoremediumandsmallpreyduringthistime.Thiswastrendwasstatisticallysignificantformales(G=16.099;df=3;p=0.001)butnotforfemales.Ingeneral,malepumadietdemonstratedmoredramatictemporalchangesthanspatialchanges.OnboththeBDAandLRmalepumadietshiftscorrespondedtotheungulatebirthpulse.While
Page 54
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
53
femalepumaalsorespondedtotheungulatebirthpulseonbothstudyareas,femalepumaexploitedtheincreasedavailabilityofsmallpreyspeciesinthefloodplaintoagreaterextentthanmales.Effectsofambientlightonpuma,deer,andelkactivity
ScarletSellers,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville,SC;[email protected]
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology;[email protected]
Abstract:Puma(Pumaconcolor)dependonconcealmenttopreyprimarilyonungulates.Weaskedwhetherpumaactivity,asmeasuredbyremotecameras,andpredation,asmeasuredbyindividualpredationevents,wasaffectedbyambientlightandparticularlybylunarphase.Wealsoaskedifactivityofmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus)andelk(Cervuselaphus),weresimilarlyaffected.Toexaminetheeffectsoflunarilluminationonpumapredationwecomparedthemeanfractionofthemoonilluminatedbetweennightswhenkillsweremadeandnightswhenkillswerenotmadeusingat‐test.ToexamineactivitypatternsacrossilluminationperiodsweconductedtwosetsofChi‐squaredtestsofindependence.First,wecomparedphotocountsacrossilluminationperiodsofdawn,sunlight,dusk,dark,andmoonlightfortwostudyareas,theBosquedelApacheNationalWildlifeRefuge(BDA)andtheLadderRanch(LR)whichdifferedinhabitattypeandhumanactivity.TheBDAislocatedinriparianfloodplainandexperienceshighhumanvisitation.TheLRisincanyonlandfoothillsandhumanvisitationisrare.Second,werepeatedtheseanalysesacrossthelunarphasesofdark,1stquarter,2ndquarter,3rdquarter,and4thquarter.Usingdatafrom35camerasoperatedforvaryingperiodsfrom18May2008to1July,2012,werecorded791pumaphotos,2,922muledeerphotos,and1,201elkphotos.Pumawereprimarilynocturnal;deerandelkwereprimarilydiurnal.However,allthreespeciesweremoreactiveatnightontheBDAandmoreactiveduringdaylightontheLR(pumaX2=9.0173;df=4;p=0.061;deerX2=213.6;df=4;p<0.001;elkX2=90.75;df=4;p<0.001).Pumaactivitywasnotassociatedwithlunarphase.Deerandelkweresignificantlymoreactiveinmoonlight(X2=24.24;df=4;p<0.05andX2=21.14;df=4;p<0.05).Lunarilluminationwasnotgreateronnightswhenpumamadekills.
Page 55
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
54
Cameratrappingvsradio‐telemetry:acomparisonofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsformonitoringcougarpopulations
PeterAlexander,CraigheadBeringiaSouth,andDepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices
HowardQuigley,Panthera
DanThompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
MarkElbroch,Panthera
Abstract:Conventionalmethodsformonitoringcougarpopulationsinvolvecaptureandradio‐collaring,followedbyintensiveradio‐trackingand,essentially,simpleenumerationofindividualcougars.Thismethodisassumedtobeaccurate,butprohibitivelyexpensiveandlogisticallychallenging.Noninvasivesurveytechniquesmayofferopportunitiestoaccuratelymonitorcougarpopulationtrendsatlowercoststhanconventionalcaptureandradio‐collarresearch.However,fewofthesesurveytechniqueshavebeenemployedinconjunctionwithconventionalcougarmonitoringmethodsinordertovalidatethenoninvasivepopulationestimatesagainstthosederivedfromradio‐telemetry.Along‐termcougarecologystudycurrentlybeingconductedintheJacksonHoleregionofNorthwestWyoming(theTetonCougarProject(TCP))offersanopportunitytotestnoninvasivemonitoringtechniquesonapopulationofcougarswithanestimatedknowndensity.Wesetupanarrayof43remotecamerastationsacrosstheTCPstudyareafromJunetoSeptemberin2012and2013.Thearraycomprisedof6x6kmcells,coveringatotalof1,548km2.Camerastationsweresetupusinganon‐rewardbloodluretoincreasedetectionprobabilityandtoincreaseprobabilityofidentificationthroughrepeatedphotographsperdetection.Werecorded17and16cougarphoto‐eventsin2012and2013,respectively.Weidentifiedindividualcougarsbasedonsize,morphology,andnaturalmarkings.Weproducedestimatesofabundanceusingcapture‐mark‐recaptureanalysis.Preliminaryanalysisindicatesthatthetelemetry‐derivedpopulationestimatesfallwithintheconfidenceestimatesproducedbythecamerasurvey.However,lownumbersofuniqueindividualsdetectedandpotentialviolationsofmark‐recaptureassumptionspresentissuesthatstillneedresolving.
Page 56
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
55
P22:WillthismountainlionmakeitinHollywood?
JeffA.Sikich,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea;[email protected]
SethP.D.Riley,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea;[email protected]
Abstract:Understandingthemovementsandecologyofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)iscriticalfortheeffectiveconservationofthiswide‐rangingandlow‐densityspecies,especiallyinurbanfragmentedlandscapes.InFebruary2012amountainlionwasdiscoveredbyremotecamerasinGriffithPark,anisolated20km²patchofhabitatnexttodowntownLosAngelesthatiscompletelysurroundedbyfreewaysanddevelopment.InMarch2012,theNationalParkServicecapturedandGPSradio‐collaredayoungmale(P22),whowecontinuetofollowaspartofourlongtermstudyofmountainlionecology,behavior,andconservationinSantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea(SMMNRA)andthesurroundingregion.GenetictestingindicatesthatP22iscloselyrelatedtomountainlionsintheSantaMonicaMountainstothewest,inwhichcasehewouldhavehadtocrosstwomajorfreeways(405and101)toarriveinGriffithPark.WereportonP22’smovementpatterns,diet,andlocationswithinGriffithPark’snaturalareasandthesurroundingurbancommunities.GriffithParkreceives10millionvisitorsyearly,andyetP22remainselusiveandisrarelyseenbypeople.P22hasalsobecomeanambassadorforwildlifeandcorridorneedsintheLosAngelesarea,ashisstoryhasbeenwellcoveredinmediaoutlets.Wehavedocumentedmanyanthropogenicthreatstomountainlionsoverthecourseofourresearch,includinganticoagulantrodenticideexposure,roadmortality,andpotentiallyincreasedintraspecificconflict.ContinuedtrackingofP22willprovideimportantinsightsonmountainlionsurvivalandmovementinanisolatedandurbanlandscape,includingwhetherandwherehemovesoutofGriffithPark.Followingmountainlions,includingP22,inthefragmentedhabitatssurroundingSMMNRAwillallowustoidentifyhabitatlinkagesandcorridorscriticaltothesurvivalofmountainlionsandotherlargemammals.Inaddition,wehopetodeterminehowmountainlionscanbestcoexistwithhumansinthiscomplexurban‐wildlandinterface.
Page 57
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
56
Compensationandadditivityincougarmortality:learningfromheavilyandlightlyharvestedpopulations
MichaelL.Wolfe,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;[email protected]
PatTerletzky,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
DavidM.Choate,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevada,LasVegas;[email protected]
DavidN.Koons,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
LiseM.Aubry,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:Theinteractionbetweenanthropogenicandnaturalmortalityhaslonginterestedecologistsandisofcentralimportancetospeciesconservationandmanagement.Westudiedmortalitypatternsoftwocougar(Pumaconcolor)populationsinUtah,one(Monroe)exposedtohighlevelsofhuntingmortalityandthesecond(Oquirrhs)wassubjectedtomoderatelevelsofexploitation.Weusedcompetingriskanalysistodeterminesurvivalandcause‐specificmortalityratesusinginformationon224cougarsthatwerecapturedandequippedwithradio‐collars.Duringthis17‐yearinvestigation,146animalsdiedofaknowncauseofmortality(11diedofunknowncauses),andtheremaining67individualswereright‐censoredattheendofthestudyperiod.Anthropogenicmortalitycountedfor85.8%and51.9%ofthetotaldeathsintheheavilyandlightlyexploitedpopulations,respectively.Inbothpopulations,theprimarycausesofdeathwerehuntingandpoaching,withtheexceptionoffemalesontheOquirrhmountainsthatprimarilydiedofnaturalcauses.Regressionofannualsurvivalasafunctionofallsourcesofhumanexploitationrevealedasignificantnegativerelationship,indicatingstrongadditivityofanthropogenicandnaturalmortalityintheheavilyexploitedpopulation.Exploitationinthesemi‐protectedpopulationdidnotleadtoanysignificantdeclinesinannualsurvival,suggestingsomelevelofcompensationbetweennaturalandanthropogeniccausesofmortality.Empiricalstudiesthatdirectlyaddressadditiveversuscompensatorymortalityinexploitedpopulationsoflargecarnivoresarerare.Ourresultsdemonstratetheneedfor,andpowerof,sustainedlong‐termdatacollectioninaddressingimportantquestionsconcerningtheconservationandmanagementoflong‐livedcarnivores.
Page 58
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
57
Therelationshipofruraldepopulationtopuma‐humanconflictintheAltiplanoregionofTarapacá,Chile
OmarOhrens,NelsonInstituteforEnvironmentalStudies,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison;[email protected]
AdrianTreves,NelsonInstituteforEnvironmentalStudies,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison;[email protected]
CristianBonacic,FaunaAustralisWildlifeLaboratory,DepartmentofEcosystemandEnvironment,SchoolofAgricultureandForestry,PontifíciaUniversidadCatólicadeChile,Santiago,Chile;[email protected]
Abstract:IntheAltiplanoregionofTarapacáinChile,theAymarapeoplehavereportedanincreaseofpuma‐humanconflict,mainlyincludingpredationonlivestock.Thelackofinformationaboutthestatusofthisspeciesandtheabsenceofverificationofpumaattacksonlivestockmakeitdifficulttoapplyinterventions.Moreover,themigrationofnumerousAymaratocitieshasmeantchangesintraditionalagriculturalpractices,whichmayaccountforanincreasedsenseofvulnerabilitytopumas.WeinterviewedAymaralivestockownerstounderstandhowcertainpatternsofruraldepopulation(olderpeople,smallerhouseholdsizes,lesssupervision,lowresidency)couldberelatedtotheconflictbetweenpumasandpeople.Wefoundthatolderrespondents,withsmallerhouseholdsizesandlesstimespentintheirresidence,perceivedadeclineinpumapredationevents.However,respondentswhoperceivedanincreaseinpredationeventspresentedtheoppositepatterns.Wefoundanassociationbetweentheperceivedlevelofconflictandtheuseornotofaguard.Respondentsthatperceivedahighriskofpumaattackimplementedtheuseofaguardwhentheywereabsentfromtheirresidence,indicatingcertainadaptationstotheirtraditionalpractices.Themitigationoftheconflictandthereforethefutureofpumaconservationintheregionmaydependontheimplementationofinterventionsthatinfluencepeople’sperceptions.Weproposethehighest‐priorityinterventionincludesverifyingandmeasuringlossesandfurtherhumandimensionsworktoidentifycausesofcomplaints.Subsequentinterventionstopreventlossesorpreventretaliationagainstpumascanthenbetargetedmoreprecisely.
Page 59
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
58
WildpumasinBritain–exploringevidenceandgaugingpeople’sattitudes
RickMinter,BigCatStudy,RoyalAgriculturalUniversity,Cirencester,UK;[email protected]
Dr.AndrewHemmings,BigCatStudy,RoyalAgriculturalUniversity,Cirencester,UK
Abstract:AcrossBritain,allegedsightingsofpumasandblackpanthershaveoccurredfromthe1970s.Insomecounties,scoresofallegedsightingsaredocumentedannuallybyvolunteergroups.Itisassumedmanyencountersarekeptsecret,withpeoplefearingridiculeorconcernedatattractingtrophyhunters.Withnoknowledgeofpumas,peoplehavedescribedtheform,colour,locomotion,calls,andinrarecasestheyoung,ofcatsresemblingPumaconcolor.Puma‐likecatsaccountforuptoathirdofthedescriptionsinthedocumentedreports,yearonyear.Melanisticleopardisthemaincandidateforplausibleblackpantherreports.Despitetheconsistencyandcontinuityofwitnessreports,primaryevidenceislessapparent,butincludesasmallnumberofcarcassremainsverifiedbyvetsanduptoahandfulofDNAresults.Thepaucityofhardevidenceshouldbejudgedagainstthelackofresourcesappliedtodate,andtheabsenceofpastsystematicwork.AnemergingstudyattheRoyalAgriculturalUniversityexplorestheevidenceforbigcatsandlinkswithcommunitiesandlandowners.Trustingrelationshipsareimportant,givenpropertyowners’reticenceindrawingattentiontobigcatslinkedwiththeirlandandbusiness.People’sattitudestowardspossiblebigcatsarealsodocumentedatthestudy’soutreachevents.Underthenewstudy,aswellasDNAtesting,earlyprogressincludesthecollectionofskeletalremainsfortoothpitanalysis.Thescaleandpatternofcarnassialimpressionsonfourspecimenstodate,fromdifferentareas,weighsinfavourofpuma/leopardsizecats.Theattitudinalresultsshowamarkedconsistencyacrossthedifferentsamples:offeredarangeofoptions,includingscepticismandintolerance,peoplemainlyexpressfascinationandconcludethat(conditional)tolerance,andproperstudy,istheresponsiblewayforwardforunderstandingpossiblebigcatsintheirlocality.Theecologyofaconflict:Eurasianlynxdepredationondomesticsheepandsemi‐domesticreindeerinNorway
JohnOdden.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch;[email protected]
JennyMattisson.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
JohnLinnell.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
Abstract:Publicattitudestowardslargecarnivoreshavechangeddramaticallyduringthelast30years,andmanylargecarnivorepopulationsarenowrecoveringandexpandingintonewareas.InNorway,theEurasianlynx(Lynxlynx)population
Page 60
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
59
increasedrapidlyinthemid1990’sresultinginincreaseddepredationandconflictswithsemi‐domesticreindeer(Rangifertarandus)andsheep(Ovisaries)herders.Annually,closetotwomillionsheeparegrazinginforestandalpine‐tundrahabitatsfromJuneuntilSeptember.SheepgrazingareasarefoundthroughoutNorway,butgrazingisespeciallyintensiveinthemountainsofsouth‐westernNorway.Inaddition,indigenousSámipeoplemanage230000semi‐domesticreindeerinthecentralandnorthernpartsofNorway.Thereisalegalrequirementthatalllossestolargecarnivoresshouldbefullycompensated.Anexpostfactocompensationschemeisbasedonanestimationoflossesandispaiddirectlytotheowners.In2013,alynxpopulationofapproximately350individualswasheldresponsibleforkilling7111sheepand8054reindeer.PersonnelfromtheStateNatureInspectorate(SNO)examinealllivestockfounddead,anddocumentthecauseofdeaththroughanecropsy.However,thedetectionrateofcarnivore‐killedreindeerisverylow(9%inwinterand2%insummer)sothereisahighdegreeofuncertaintyconcerningtherealmagnitudeofdepredation.Understandingthefactorsshapingthedynamicsofcarnivore–livestockconflictsisvitaltofacilitatelargecarnivoreconservationinmulti‐uselandscapes.Inthisstudywequantifiedlynxkillratesonsheepandreindeerintwostudyareas,onenorthernarea(sheepandreindeer)andonesouthernarea(sheep).Dataondiet,killratesonsheepanddomesticreindeer,andmovementof80individuallynxwerecollectedfrom1995to2013.Inthesouthernareaweinvestigatedhowthedensityoftheirmainwildprey,roedeer(Capreoluscapreolus)modulateslynxkillratesonsheepacrossarangeofsheepandroedeerdensities.Weusedzero‐inflatednegativebinomial(ZINB)modelsincludinglynxsex,sheepdensityandanindexofroedeerdensityasexplanatoryvariablestomodelobservedkillratesonsheep,andrankedthemodelsbasedontheirAICcvalues.Themodelincludingtheeffectsoflynxsexandsheepdensityinthezero‐inflationmodelandtheeffectoflynxsexandroedeerdensityinthenegativebinomialpartreceivedmostsupport.Irrespectiveofsheepdensityandsex,wefoundthelowestsheepkillratesinareaswithhighdensitiesofroedeer.Asroedeerdensitydecreased,maleskilledsheepathigherrates,andthispatternheldforbothhighandlowsheepdensities.Similarly,femaleskilledsheepathigherratesinareaswithhighdensitiesofsheepandlowdensitiesofroedeer.However,whensheepdensitieswerelowfemalesrarelykilledsheepirrespectiveofroedeerdensity.Inthenorthernareawequantifylynxkillratesonreindeeracrossarangeofecologicalconditions.Killrateswerestronglyaffectedbysexandsocialstatus(i.e.femaleswithandwithoutkittens),aswellasseasonandreindeeravailability.Thehighestkillrateswereobservedinsummerformalelynx,andthelowestwereobservedduringwinterforsolitarylynxatlowreindeerdensity.Ourquantificationofdepredationratesonsheepandreindeercanbethefirststeptowardsestablishingfairercompensationsystemsbasedonmoreaccurateandareaspecificestimationoflosses.Thisstudydemonstrateshowwecanuseecologicaltheorytopredictwherelossesofsheepwillbegreatest,andcanbeusedtoidentifyareaswheremitigationmeasuresaremostlikelytobeneeded.
Page 61
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
60
Cougarresponsetodifferentlevelsofresidentialdevelopment
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
MarkE.Swanson,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;[email protected]
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
GaryM.Koehler,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
HilaryS.Cooley,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;[email protected]
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;[email protected] .
Abstract:Theproximityofcougars(Pumaconcolor)andpeoplehasalwaysbeenamanagementconcern,butlittleisknownofhowuseofresidentialareasisaffectedbyhousingdensitylevelsandpatterns.Weusedutilizationdistributions(UDs)derivedfromGPS,ARGOSandVHFcollardatafrom101cougarstocomparehowdifferentlevelsofresidentialdevelopmentinfluenceuseacross4studyareasinWashington.WecomparedtheUDsofcougarswithresidentialdevelopmentquantifiedfromcountytaxparceldatausingaWeibullmodelinganalysisandmultiplecomparisontechniques.Cougarsusedpredominantlyundevelopedparcelsatboththehectare( =98.09%ofuse,SD=3.12,n=101)andkm2( =81.59%,SD=15.60,n=101)scalesandusedecreasedwithincreasingresidentialdensities.Ninety‐ninepercentofcougaruseofresidentialareasinwesternWashingtonoccurredinareaswith≤846.0residences/km2,whichwassignificantlyhigherthanintheeasternWashingtonstudyareaswherecougarsusedareaswithresidentialdensities≤55.2residences/km2.Diffuse,lowdensitydevelopmentfacilitateshigherlevelsofcougaruse,butresidentialdevelopmentaturbandensitieswithadjacentwildlandhabitatcomprisedofdensevegetationappearstoincreasecougaruseofresidentialdevelopmentwithminimaldirectuseofdevelopedparcels.Wildlifemanagersandlandscapeplannerscouldusethemodeltoidentifyandmaintainwildlifecorridorsindevelopingareas,locationstoconstructhighwaycrossingstructurestopreserveconnectivity,reduceuseofresidentialareasbycougars,oridentifywherecougaruseofresidentialdevelopmentislikelytooccursoastotargeteducationandoutreachefforts.
Page 62
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
61
Session6:
PredatorsandPrey,Part1
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 63
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
62
ProgramCluster:identifyingpredationeventsthroughclusteredGPSdata
PeterJ.Mahoney,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
JulieK.Young,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;[email protected] .
JohnA.Shivik,UtahDivisionofWildlifeResources;[email protected]
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected] .
Abstract:Non‐parametrickerneldensityestimatorsarecommonlyusedtoclassifyhomerangesorutilizationdistributionsfromanimallocationdata.Here,weextendther‐LoCoHestimatorofGetzetal.(2007)usingtime‐constrainedconvexhulls.Thisextensionwasoriginallydevelopedwiththeintentofidentifyingpredationeventsusingglobalpositioningsystemdataderivedfrompredatorspace‐usemonitoringefforts,butcanbeappliedtoanysystemwherefrequentandaccuraterelocationdataareavailableandrelocationclusteringinspaceandtimeareindicativeofbehaviorsofinterest(i.e.denning,nesting).ThepresentmethodiswrappedinaPythonprogramcalledProgramClustertoalloweasyandrapidimplementationbyuserswithlimitedprogrammingknowledge.TheoutputfromProgramClusterresemblesafragmentedutilizationdistribution,witheachfragmentcorrespondingtoareasidentifiedasintenselyusedinthelocationdatabasedonuser‐specifiedspatialandtemporaltuningparameters.Further,eachfragmentcanbeinterpretedasanindividualutilizationdistributionwithmoreheavilyshadedregions(i.e.greatesthulloverlap)correspondingtoareaswiththehighestintensityofuse.Wediscusstheextendedr‐LoCoHmethod,programimplementation,andoutputinthecontextanon‐goingcougar(Felisconcolor)studyonMonroeMountain,FishlakeNationalForest,Utah.Cougarstrategiesoffeedingsiteselection:energymaximization,classicaloptimalforaging,orfeardrivenhumanaversion?
KevinA.Blecha,GraduateDegreePrograminEcology,ColoradoStateUniversity;[email protected]
MatW.Alldredge,ColoradoParksandWildlife;[email protected]
RandallB.Boone,DepartmentofEcosystemScienceandSustainability,ColoradoStateUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:Understandingpredatorforagingecologyinregionsofincreasinganthropogenicdevelopmentisimportantwhendevisingmanagementstrategiesto
Page 64
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
63
reducecougar‐humanconflicts.Apureenergymaximizationstrategypredictsthatpatchuseofaforagingcougarisdrivenbytheselectionoflandscapefactorsthatmaximizeencounterswithprimarypreyspecies.However,previousresearchonfinescalepatch‐userarelyshowslinearrelationshipswithdirectmeasuresofpreyavailability.Apurefear‐drivenstrategypredictsthatpatchuseisdrivenbylandscapefactorsassociatedwithhigherriskofmortality.Whileitislogicalthatacougarwouldavoidareaslinkedtohigherratesofmortality,testingthishasbeenmetwithonlylimitedsuccess.Optimalforagingtheorywouldattempttoexplainpatchusageasabehavioralbalancingactbetweenenergymaximizationandfear‐drivenhumanaversion.Totestthis,measuresofpreyavailabilityandcougarusagemustbeattainedatscalessuitabletothebehavior.Anovelcameratrappingsurveytechniqueusing41,000trapnightswasusedtomodelthebackgroundencounterratesacrossthelandscapeofvariouspreyspeciesofcougars,withparticularemphasisonarangeofhousingdensities.Predictedfeedingsitelocationswerederivedfor49cougarsbyamodelusingatrainingsetof4,400clustersofground‐truthedGPSlocations.Usingconditionallogisticregressionanalysis,characteristicsoffeedingsites(humanhousing,backgroundpreyencounterprobabilities,andnaturalhabitat)werecomparedtocharacteristicsofGPSlocationswithinthepriortravellingsequencetotestthedegreeofoptimalforagingatafinespatialscale.Preliminaryresultsindicatedirectandindirectrelationshipsinreferencetohumansandbackgroundencounterratesofprimaryprey(deer).However,somedifficultiesarisewhenteasingoutadditionalinfluencesofhighlyusedalternativepreyspecies(i.e.,raccoon,domesticcat),whosebackgroundencounterratesaredrivenbythepresenceofhumandwellings.Estimatingmountainlion(Pumaconcolor)predationratesintherecentlyrecolonizedregionoftheLittleMissouriBadlands,NorthDakota,USA
DavidT.Wilckens,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
JoshuaB.Smith,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
StephanieA.Tucker,NorthDakotaGameandFishDepartment
DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
Abstract:Recentrecolonizationofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)intotheBadlandsofNorthDakota,USAhasledtoquestionsonthepotentialimpactsofpredationonpreypopulationsintheregion.From2012‐2013,wedeployed9real‐timeglobalpositioningsystem(GPS)collarstoinvestigatemountainlionfeeding
Page 65
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
64
habits.Wemonitoredmountainlionsfor1,845days,investigated506GPSclusters,andidentified292feedingevents.Weusedlogisticregressiontopredictfeedingeventsandsizeofpreyconsumedatanadditional535non‐investigatedclustersites.Ourtopmodelforpredictingpresenceofpreyitemsproducedareceiveroperatingcurve(ROC)scoreof0.90andanoverallaccuracyof81.4%;topmodelforpredictingpreysizehadaROCscoreof0.89andanoverallaccuracyof84.6%.ApplicationofourmodelstoallGPSclustersresultedinanestimatedungulatekillrateof1.09ungulates/week(95%CI=0.83–1.36)insummerand0.90ungulates/week(95%CI=0.69–1.12)inwinter.Weestimatedmountainlionsconsumed39.6kg/week(95%CI=30.4‐48.8)insummerand51.6kg/week(95%CI=37.4–65.8)inwinter.Overallscavengerateswere3.7%insummerand11.9%inwinter.Preycompositionincludedhigherproportionsofnon‐ungulatesinsummer(female=21.5%;male=24.8%)thaninwinter(female=4.8%;male=7.5%).ProportionofjuvenileungulatesinmountainliondietsincreasedfollowingtheungulatebirthpulseinJune(June–August=60.7%,95%CI=43.0–78.3;Sept‐May=37.2%,95%CI=30.8–43.7),resultinginanungulatekillrate1.61timeshigherduringfawningseason(1.41ungulates/week,95%CI=1.12–1.71)thanduringtheremainderoftheyear(0.88ungulates/week,95%CI=0.62–1.13).OurresultsdocumentfeedinghabitsofarecentlyrecolonizedmountainlionpopulationandwillincreaseeffectivemanagementofthisspeciesintheBadlandsRegionofNorthDakota.Estimatingcougar(Pumaconcolor)consumptionratesandpreycompositionintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.
JoshuaB.Smith,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity;[email protected]
DavidT.Wilckens,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
JohnBroecher,SouthDakotaDepartmentofGame,Fish,andParks
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
Abstract:Followingdeclinesinthe19thand20thcenturies,recentrangeexpansionsofcougars(Pumaconcolor)intotheupperMidwestarechallengingeffectivemanagementofthesenewpredator–preysystems.Theseregionsprovideauniqueopportunitytoassesstheroleofthisapexpredatoronpreypopulationdynamicsandecosystemprocessesinareaswhereanthropogenicinfluencesaresignificantlydifferent(e.g.,higherroaddensities,higherhumanpopulations)frompreviousstudies.Ourobjectiveswereto:1)determinepreycompositionofcougardiets,2)quantifyungulatekillrates,3)assesstheinfluenceofseasonanddemographicstatusonpredationrates,and4)determinetheinfluenceofscavengingonoverallcougarconsumptionratesintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.From2009–2012,we
Page 66
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
65
captured41cougars(29females;11males)andusedglobalpositioningsystem(GPS)telemetrytolocate1,506feedingevents.Deer(Odocoileusspp.)comprisedthemajorityofcougardiets(83%),andincaseswherewecouldidentifyspecies,white‐taileddeer(Odocoileusvirginianus)dominated(63%).Overallungulatekillrateaveraged0.79ungulates/week,butwashighlyvariable(range=0.13–1.75ungulates/week)amongindividuals.Wefoundkillratesweresignificantlyhigher(P<0.001)insummer(x̄=0.92;95%CI=0.81–1.03)thaninwinter(x̄=0.62;95%CI=0.51–0.74);however,wefoundnodifferencesbydemographicstatus(e.g.,sex,age,orpresenceofcubs)withinthesameseason(summer:P=0.581;winter:P=0.607).Scavengingaccountedfor17.3%(n=260)ofallpreyitemsfoundintermsofrelativefrequencywithhigherratesobservedinwinter(x̄=0.21events/week)thaninsummer(x̄=0.08events/week).OurresultshighlighthowadaptableandopportunisticcougarsareatforagingforpreyandprovideinformationtodirectfuturecougarandungulatemanagementintheBlackHillsecoregion.Nowheretohide:pumas,blackbearsandcompetitionrefuges
L.MarkElbroch,Panthera;[email protected]
PatrickE.Lendrum,Panthera;[email protected]
MaximilianL.Allen,SchoolofBiologicalSciences,VictoriaUniversityofWellington;[email protected]
HeikoU.Wittmer,SchoolofBiologicalSciences,VictoriaUniversityofWellington;[email protected]
Abstract:Interspecificcompetitionisasignificantinfluenceonthediversityandmembershipofcommunityassemblages,andaprevailingquestionishowcompetitivecarnivorescoexistwithoutthedominantcarnivoredrivingthesubordinatecompetitortolocalextinction.Onehypothesisisthatthesubordinatecarnivorerequiresandutilizes“competitionrefuges,”wheretheinfluencesofthedominantcompetitorareminimized.Americanblackbears(Ursusamericanus)aresympatricwithpumas(Pumaconcolor)acrossmostofthepuma’srangeinNorthAmerica,andadominantscavengerthatdisplacepumasfromtheirkills.Wetestedfortheeffectofblackbearkleptoparasitsimonpumasearchtime,handlingtimeandkillratesintwostudysystems:westernColoradoandnorthernCalifornia.Pumasexhibitedincreasedkillratesandshorterhandlingtimes,andselectedforsmallerprey,whenbearswereactive.OurResourceSelectionFunctionanalysesshowedthatwhenbearswereactive,theywereaslikelytofindpumakillsanywhereonthelandscape.Weconcludedthatduringthebearseason,pumascouldnoteffectivelyhidefromthem;insteadourresultssuggestedthatundiscoveredpumakillswererandomeventsorduetosomevariablewedidnottest.Further,ourfindingssuggestedthatbearkleptoparasitsmmaybedrivinghigherpumakillratesinthewarmerseasonswherethetwospeciesoverlap,whichhasimplicationsforbothcarnivoreandungulatemanagement,aswellaspotentiallyimpactingpumafitness.
Page 67
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
66
Session7:
PredatorsandPrey,Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 68
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
67
Top‐downversusbottom‐upforcing:evidencefrommountainlionsandmuledeer
BeckyM.Pierce,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
VernonC.Bleich,WildlifeInvestigationsLaboratory,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife
KevinL.Monteith,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity
R.TerryBowyer,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity
Abstract:Westudiedmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)andmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus)inhabitingaGreatBasinecosysteminRoundValley,California,tomakeinferencesconcerningpredator–preydynamics.Ourpurposewastoevaluatetherelativeroleoftop‐downandbottom‐upforcingonmuledeerinthismultiple‐predator,multiple‐preysystem.Weidentifiedaperiodofdecline(by83%)ofmuledeer(1984–1990),andthenaperiodofslowbutsteadyincrease(1991–1998).Formuledeer,bitterbrush(Purshiatridentata)indiets,percapitaavailabilityofbitterbrush,kidneyfatindexes,fetalrates(youngperadultfemale),fetalweights,andsurvivorshipofadultsandyoungindicatedthattheperiodofdeclinewastypicalofadeerpopulationnearorabovethecarryingcapacity(K)ofitsenvironment.Numbersofmountainlionsalsodeclined,butwithalongtimelag.Theperiodofincreasewastypifiedbydeerdisplayinglife‐historycharacteristicsofapopulationbelowK,yetthefiniterateofgrowth(k¼1.10)remainedbelowwhatwouldbeexpectedforapopulationreboundingrapidlytowardK(k¼1.15–1.21)intheabsenceoflimitingfactors.Life‐historycharacteristicswereconsistentwiththemuledeerpopulationbeingregulatedbybottom‐upforcingthroughenvironmentaleffectsonforageavailabilityrelativetopopulationdensity;however,predation,mostlybymountainlions,waslikelyadditiveduringtheperiodofincreaseandthus,top‐downforcingslowedbutdidnotpreventpopulationgrowthofmuledeer.Theseoutcomesindicatethatresourceavailability(bottom‐upprocesses)hasanever‐presenteffectondynamicsofherbivorepopulations,butthattherelationshipcanbealteredbytop‐downeffects.Indeed,top‐downandbottom‐upforcescanactonpopulationssimultaneouslyand,thus,shouldnotbeviewedasastarkdichotomy.CougarpredationintheMojaveDesert:seasonalspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencespreyselectionmorethanwateruse
DavidM.Choate,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevadaLasVegas,&WesternEcologicalResearchCenter,U.S.GeologicalSurvey;[email protected]
Page 69
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
68
KathleenM.Longshore,WesternEcologicalResearchCenter,U.S.GeologicalSurvey;[email protected] .
DanielB.Thompson,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevadaLasVegas;[email protected] .
Abstract:Cougar(Pumaconcolor)predationindesertenvironmentsmaybeenhancedwhenungulatepreyincreasetheiruseofwatersourcesduringsummermonths.Understandingtheconditionsinwhichdifferentfactorsinfluencepredationremainsanimportantissueforwildlifemanagers.Forwatersourcestofunctionasecologicaltrapsitisnecessarynotonlytodetectpredationeventsproximatetowatersources,butalsotodeterminethattheseeventsoccurmorefrequentlythanexpectedbyspatialoverlapofcougarsandprey.Weinvestigatedthespatio‐temporalpatternsofcougarpredationondesertungulatesinrelationtowateruseontheDesertNationalWildlifeRefuge(DNWR)NV,bytrackingGPS‐collaredcougarsandbighorn.Annualsurvivorshipforcollaredbighornwashigh(~93%).Cougarkillscomprised~64.3%muledeer(Odocoileushemionus)and30.3%bighornsheep,andoccurredclosertowatersources(3.4±2.4km)thanrandompoints(6.6±3.2km).However,only1killoccurredwithin200mofawatersourceand<5%ofallkillsoccurred<0.5kmfromwater(range=0.32–16.7km).Cougarlocationsweremorecloselyrelatedtosheeplocationsthanwatersources,withnosignificantdifferenceinspatialoverlapacrossseasons.Althoughbighornusedwatersourcesmostextensivelyduringdaylighthoursofsummermonths,asrecordedby24‐hcamera‐monitors,fewbighornwerekilledduringsummer.Instead,mostwerekilledduringwinter/springatthegreatestdistancesfromwatersources.Conversely,muledeerwerekilledacrossallseasons,despiteasimilarproximitytowatersources.Differentialuseofthelandscapebymuledeermayexplaintheirincreasedriskofpredationbycougarsinthisdesertenvironment.OntheDNWR,watersourcesdonotappeartofunctionasecologicaltraps;rather,seasonaldifferencesinspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencetheriskofcougarpredationforpreymorethansimplyproximitytowatersources.VariationinpreyselectionandincidenceofindividualspecializationonnovelpreyintheGreatBasin
AlysonM.Andreasen,WildlifeConservationSociety;[email protected]
JonP.Beckmann,WildlifeConservationSociety;[email protected] .
KelleyM.Stewart,NaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofNevada,Reno;[email protected]
WilliamLongland,USDAAgriculturalResearchServices,UniversityofNevada,Reno;[email protected]
CarlLackey,NevadaDepartmentofWildlife;[email protected]
Page 70
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
69
Abstract:Variationinpredationbehaviorandpreyselectionofpredatorscanhaveimportantimplicationsforecology,conservationandmanagement.Wetestedhypothesespertainingtothedegreeofindividualdietspecialization,andpotentialfitnessconsequences,ofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inareaswithvaryingabundancesandtypesofpreyinthewesternGreatBasinandeasternSierraNevada.Wevisited1,330GPSclustersmadeby21mountainlions(7males;14females)fittedwithGPScollarsfrom2009‐2012.Wefollowedindividualsanaverageof55weeks(SD=36)andlocatedremainsofpredationeventsat804oftheclusterssearched(61%)comprising14species.Dietsvariedamongindividualswithinandbetweenmountainranges.Muledeerwerethemostcommonpreyinthedietsof13individualsandferalhorseswerethemostcommonpreykilledby8individuals.Tenof13mountainlionswithaccesstoferalhorsesinGreatBasinrangesconsumedhorsesasprey.However,therewasconsiderablevariationamongthedietsofthoseindividualswithsomeindividualsspecializingonhorsestothenearexclusionofotherpreyitems.InsomeareasoftheGreatBasin,feralhorsesprovidedecologicalopportunityforpreyspecializationwheremuledeerdensitieswererelativelylow;inareasoflowavailabilityoftotalprey,however,allindividualshadgeneralistforagingstrategies.Wefoundnodifferencebetweenspecialistsandgeneralistsinbiologicalcorrelatesoffitness.Nonetheless,ourresultssuggestthatpredationonferalhorsesinaridGreatBasinRangesmayresultinfitnesscomparabletothoseofmountainlionsinareaswheredensitiesofmuledeeraresubstantiallygreater,suchastheSierraNevada.Rangeabandonmentbyungulates:Predatoravoidanceorresponsetohabitatchangesinducedbydrought?
JeffreyT.Villepique,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity;
BeckyM.Pierce,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
VernonC.Bleich,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
AleksandraAndic,DepartmentofAstronomy;[email protected]
R.TerryBowyer,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity;[email protected] .
Abstract.Weinvestigatedinfluencesofriskofpredationbymountainlions(Pumaconcolor),measuresoftopographicruggednessatmultiplescales,andvegetation,land,andsnowcover,onresourceselectioninwinterbySierraNevadabighornsheep(Oviscanadensissierrae),anendangeredtaxon.Wehypothesizedthatthosemountainungulateswouldtradeoffrewardsaccruedfromuseofcriticallow‐elevationhabitatinwinterforthesafetyofareaswithreducedriskofpredation.
Page 71
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
70
Wealsoinvestigatedthetradeoffbetweenforageandriskofpredationbytestingthehypothesisthatdifferencesinqualityofforageatlow‐elevationsversushigh‐elevationswerereducedinyearsofbelow‐averageprecipitationthaninwetyears,yieldingareducedbenefitofmigrationtolow‐elevationsduringdroughtyears.SierraNevadabighornsheepdidnottradeoffbenefitsofforageforreducedriskofpredation,butselectedareasofhighsolarradiation,whereriskofpredationbymountainlionswasgreatest,whilemitigatingindirectriskofpredationbyselectingforsteep,ruggedterrain.Bighornsheepselectedmorestronglyforareaswheremountainlionswereactiveandkilledbighornsheep,thanforlowelevationhabitatinwinter,likelybecausemountainlionsweremostactiveinthoseareasofbighornwinterrangesoverlappingrangesofmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus),wherebothungulatesaccruedforagebenefits.Wedemonstratedreducedbenefitofmigrationtolowelevationduringdroughtyears,whenthedifferenceinqualityofforagewassignificantlylowerthaninyearsofabove‐averageprecipitation,providinganalternativeexplanationtothepredator‐inducedabandonmenthypothesisforthedisuseoflow‐elevationwinterrangeobservedduringdroughtyears.Demographicresponseofmuledeertoexperimentalreductionofcoyotesandmountainlions.
MarkA.Hurley,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
JamesW.Unsworth,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
PeterZager,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
MarkHebblewhite.WildlifeBiologyProgram,CollegeofForestryandConservation,UniversityofMontana
EdwardO.Garton.DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlifeResources,UniversityofIdaho
DebraM.Montgomery.DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlifeResources,UniversityofIdaho
JohnR.Skalski.SchoolofAquaticandFisherySciences,UniversityofWashington
CraigL.Maycock.UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices
Abstract:WetestedtheefficacyofremovingcoyotesandmountainlionsonmuledeerpopulationdynamicsinsoutheasternIdaho,1997‐2006.Wemonitoredaspectsofmuledeerecologywhileexperimentallymanipulatingpredatorpopulationswithin10GameManagementUnits.Todeterminesurvivalandcausesofmortality,250neonates,2846‐month‐oldfawns,and254(521deeryears)adultfemalesweremonitoredwithradiotelemetryin2studysites,onewithcoyoteandmountainlionremovalandonewithout1998‐2002.Survivalofneonateswasrelatedtoalternatepreyabundance,coyoteremovalrates,andweatherconditions.Winterfawnsurvivalwasinfluencedbysummerprecipitation,winterprecipitation,
Page 72
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
71
mountainlionremoval,andfawnmass.Adultfemalewintersurvivalincreasedwithmountainlionremoval.Decemberfawn‐to‐adultfemaleratios(fawnratios)increasedsignificantlyatmaximumratesofmountainlionremoval.Coyoteremovalhadnosignificanteffectonfawnratios,exceptafteraweather‐relatedpopulationreduction.Coyoteormountainlionremovalalonedidnotinfluencemuledeerpopulationgrowthrate,althoughthetopmodel,includingpreviousyear’smountainlionremovalandwinterseverity,explained27%ofthevarianceinpopulationrateofincrease.Thelackoffawnratioorpopulationresponsetocoyotereductionindicatesthatdecreasedneonatemortalityduetocoyoteremovalispartiallycompensatory.Mountainlionremovalincreasedmuledeersurvivalandfawnratios,producingaminimalpositiveeffectongrowthrates.However,weobservedsomeevidenceforcompensatorymortalityinadultfemalemuledeerduringperiodsofprolongedmountainlionremovalandwhencoupledwithsignificantweathereffectsmayreducetheeffectofpredatorremovalonpopulationgrowthrate.PanelQ&A,PredatorsandPrey.
Participants:BeckyPierce,AlysonAndreasen,DaveChoate,MarkHurley,&JeffVillepique
Moderator:DavidStoner
Thefollowingisadaptedfromatape‐recordingofthediscussion.Questionsandresponseshavebeenshortenedandarenotverbatim.Q:Aproblemwehavewithmanagingwildlifeisthecomplexityoftheenvironment.Ourtoolsarefairlycoarse.Ultimatelymostpopulationsarefoodlimited.Withrespecttopumacontrolorharvestbeingacommonmanagementtactictoenhancepreynumbersandsurvival,atwhatpointinthecyclemightpumapredationbeadditive?Wheremightpredatorremovalhavesomebeneficialeffect?Becky–BasedonourresearchothermortfactorsbecomemoreadditivewhenapreypopulationisbelowK.Weseefluctuationsbetweenforageanditsimpactondeerfetalratesandrecruitmentbecauseotherfactorscomeintoplay.ForpredatorremovaltobeeffectiveyouneedtoknowtherelationshipofthepreytoK.Ifthepreyareinpoorconditionbecauseofdensitydependenteffects,muchofpredationiscompensatoryandpredatorcontrolwon’tmakemuchdifference.Q‐Whatinfluencehaveyouhadonpublicperceptionsconcerningpredationandpredatorcontrol?
Becky–Includinglocalsintheresearchmadeabigdifference.Forexample,volunteersthatwentouttolocatecollareddeerwouldsee1collarinagroupof50deerandrealizethedeerpopulationwashigherthantheyrealized.However,CAis
Page 73
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
72
differentthanotherareas;thevariouspublicsdemandthatcontroleffortsbewelljustified.Alyson–Initiallythesportsmen’sgroupsweapproachedthoughttheykneweverything.Somesurprisingresultsopenedthepublic’seyes.Astohowpredationonhorseshasbeenperceived,thesportsmenthinkitisgreat.AlthoughIthoughthorseadvocateswouldbeupset,theyseemtoappreciatetheresultsandthatpumapredationonhorses(aspeciesthatwasassumedtohavenopredators)actuallyhelpstheircause.Mark–Wespentasignificantamountoftimetalkingtopeople.Talkingtosportsmenseemedtohelp.Alotofthestudywasfundedbysportsmenandtherewasabetteracceptanceoftheresults(whichwerecontrarytowhattheyexpected)becausetheyhelpedfundit.Dave–Sportsmendirectlyinvolvedwiththeresearchweremoresupportive.Therewasadifferenceinpublicperceptionsbasedonwheretheylivedinthestate.LasVegaswasdifferentthanotherpartsofthestate.Thegeneralpublichadapoorunderstandingofwhatdensityisallabout,showingsurprisethatanimalscouldsurviveontheharshlandscapeandthatindividualsneededsomuchspace.Jeff–Providedtheobservationthatitiseasiertoconveyresultsshowingpredationisnotlimitingthepreywhenyouhavegrowingpopulationsofungulates.Q–Thereisannualvariationinweatherpatterns,andtheestimatesofK.Howcanweincorporatethisinformationintoatimelymanagementresponse?Dowehaveenoughtimetogetregulationsinplacetoachieveapredatorcontrolgoal?Mark–WeareconductingpredatorcontrolinIdahorightnow.Weneedspecialconditionstomakepredatorcontrolwork.Ourstructureis2yearsout.SowhatID’sdoneisthatwesawlionremovalhadsomeeffectsoweincreasedquotas.Howevertheincreasesareprobablynotenoughbecauseweneedtoremovealotmoretocauseaneffect.Wearenotkillingmanymorelionsthanwewerebefore.Weknowthatcoyotecontrolonthefawningrangeiswherewecanmakeadifference.Becky–WeneedtoconsidertherelationshipofpreytoK.Wewereluckytofindthatbitterbrushleadergrowthwasacriticalfactor.That’ssomethingyoucando(measure).Anothermeasureisscoringdeerbodyconditioninthefield.Ratherthanpredator,golookattheprey(it’seasierandcheaper).Alyson–Ourresultsmightsuggestthatathighdensitiesofprey,thebestapproachistoonlyremoveindividualpredatorsthataredoingdamageisthebestapproach.Whenpreydensitiesarelow,abroadbrushapproachtopredatorremovalmaybemoreeffective.David–Thewindowofinferencemaybeshorttermobservation.Butwerespondtolong‐termissues.Workwithpublictoexplainthatwecan’tmanageseasonto
Page 74
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
73
season.Wecouldincorporatenoninvasiveassessmentssuchascameratrapsatwatersourcestodeterminepreycondition.Easiertodowithsheepthandeer.Q.Mark,inyourexperimentalremovalofpredators,didyoufindmeso‐predatorreleaseanddidthathaveanimpactonfawnmortality.Also,doyouthinkit’spossiblethattheconstantremovalofterritorialanimalsresultsinanartificiallylargepredatorpopulation?Mark–Wehadsomeanecdotalobservationsofincreasedbobcatmortalityonfawns.Removalratesandsocialdynamicswascertainlyanissueincoyotes;wehadnoopportunitytolookatthepumasocialsystem.However,thepumakittensthatwedidcollaremigratedtoareawherewewereremovingpumasandallwerekilled.Q.Alyson,wherewerethepumaskillingthehorses?Alyson–Horseswerekilledwherevertheywereactive:acrossshaleslopes,incanyonbottoms,inopensagebrush.Itwasreallyvariable.Q.Didanyofyourstudiesshowanylong‐termdemographicconsequences?Becky–Wesawashiftinmigrationpatternsofdeer,butwethinkthiswascausedbybearpredationonfawns.Aprimarymigratorypatternceasedtobethebestchoice.Mark–Anolderagestructureinthedoesleadstosenescence.Adultdeerstartintosenescenceatabout6.5years.Theseolderdeerproducefewerfawns.Manydeerpopulationshaveanolderdoeagestructuresoanythingwecandotoreducetheageonthedoeswouldhelp.DaveStoner’sclosingstatement:Frommanagementstandpointitisimportanttoincreaseeffortsatconveyingsciencetothevariouspublicsthatweserve.Therehasbeenalotofbasicresearchpresentedthismorning,Itwillbenicetoseeitappliedinthefuture.
Page 75
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
74
Session8:
FelidsandHumans,Part1
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 76
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
75
Correlatesofpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina
MauroLucherini,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,Argentina;[email protected]
MariaGuerisoli,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmaciaArgentina;[email protected]
NicolasCaruso,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,UNS‐CONICET,Argentina;[email protected]
EmmaCasanave,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,UNS‐CONICET;[email protected]
EstelaLuengosVidal,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia;[email protected]
Abstract:Puma(Pumaconcolor)stillhasawidespreaddistributioninArgentina.However,manypopulationsarethreatenedbyhabitatdestructionanddirectkillingassociatedtothespreadingofcroplandsandranchlands.ThisisthecaseofpumasinhabitingtheEspinalofthecentralArgentinalowlands,anecoregionmarkingthetransitionfromthePampasgrasslands,wherethepumahasalmostgoneextinct,totheMontewoodlands.Inthisregion,theintensefragmentationofnaturalhabitatsanddecreaseofnativepreyhasincreasedtheencroachmentofpumaswithlivestock.Retaliatorykilling,whichisthecommonresponsetopumapredationoncattle,isincreasingandlocalranchersarerequestingalegalbountysystemtohuntpumas.WereporttheresultsofthefirststepsofaprojectaimingtounderstandtheecologyofpumapopulationsintheEspinal,characterizepuma‐livestockconflicts,andidentifyconflictmitigationstrategies.Our148semi‐structuredinterviewstolocalranchersshowedthat45.7%ofrespondentsthinkthatpumascausemajordamage,47.5%reportedlossescausedbypumasinthepreviousyearand70.2%consideredthatpredatorcontrolwasthebestsolutiontoconflicts.Landscape‐scalecameratrapsurveys(totalinganeffortof7054trap‐days)produced45recordsofpumasin11.5%of184samplingstations.Apreliminaryhabitatsuitabilityanalysisbasedon110presencerecordssuggeststhatmostsuitablelocationsforpumawereawayfromcroplandorurbanareasandfromthemainroads,distancestoroadsandtoscrublandpatcheswerethevariablesaffectingthemostitsnichebreadth,andonly16.3%oftheregionhasahighqualityforthisfelid.OurresultssuggestthatwhereaspumasincentralArgentinamaytoleratesomedegreeofhabitatdegradationandhuman‐relatedmortality,humansarerarelywillingtotolerateeconomiclossescausedbydepredationandthatconflictmitigationmeasuresarerequiredtoensurepumaconservation.
Page 77
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
76
RoadimpactsonmountainlionsinOrangeCounty,California:usingmultipledatatypestoprioritizemanagementactions
PatrickR.Huber,InformationCenterfortheEnvironment,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
WalterM.Boyce,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
Abstract:Roadimpactsareathreattomanyspeciesdueprimarilytohabitatfragmentationanddirectmortalityfromvehiclecollisions.WestudiedtheeffectsofarelativelynewhighwayonmountainlionsandseveralotherspeciesinOrangeCounty,California.Weusedthreedifferenttypesofdata:roadkillrecords,GPScollardata,andleastcostconnectivitymodels.Roadkillrecordsindicatedthat11mountainlionshadbeenkilledbycarsinthe15milelongstudyareasincehighwayconstruction,withanadditional6killedonanothersectionofthehighwayoratitsjunctionswithotherroads.MountainlionGPScollardatawerecollectedatvaryingintervalsfromeveryfiveminutestoeverysixhours.GPSpointstakenatfiveminuteintervalswereusedtoidentify20crossinglocations,andleastcostconnectivitymodelsusinglongerintervaldatawereutilizedtoestimatethelocationsof55additionalcrossingevents.Becauseimpactswerebeingassessedformultiplespecies,deersurveyandroadkilldatawereusedtoidentifyareasofhighriskforotherspecies.Thehighwaysectionbeingstudiedwasthensplitinto500‐metersegments.Thevariousdatawerecombinedintoafinalimpactscoreandvalueswereassignedtoeach500‐metersegment.Resultsarecurrentlybeingusedtoprioritizemanagementactionsbythehighwaymanagementagency,includinginstallationofextensivenewfencingandmonitoringofexistingcrossingstructureswithcameras.Inaddition,weusedthedatatoadvisetheagencyonthedesignofapotentialfutureextensionofthehighwayinordertoreducetheexpectedimpactsonmountainlionsandotherspecies.AnoverviewofpumadepredationtrendsinCalifornia,1972‐2013
AnneM.Orlando,FelidaeConservationFund;[email protected]
MarcKenyon,CaliforniaDept.ofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
Abstract:Factorsrelatingtomountainliondepredationsincludegeographicattributes(landscapescale),propertyattributes(propertyscale),andattributesofthedepredatingindividual(organismalscale).WeexpandonpreviousworkbyapplyingGeographicInformationSystemsmethodsandclassificationtreeanalysistoCalifornia’sstatewidepumadepredationpermitdatabase,whichcontainsrecords
Page 78
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
77
from1972–2013.Thesemethodsallowustodiscernrelationshipsbetweenenvironmentalandorganismalvariablesaffectingdepredationpatternsthatcouldotherwisebeobscuredbyimpactsofscale.Wesupplementthisanalysisbyincludingrecordsinthestate’spumanecropsydatabase,whichcontainsnecropsyrecordsofnearlyallpumastakenpursuanttodepredationpermitsfrom1993–2013.Here,wepresentdescriptivestatisticsandanalysesexplicatingtemporalandspatialtrendsinfrequencyofpumadepredation,domesticspeciesaffected,environmentalandgeographiccorrelates,andmitigatingfactorsthatmustbeconsideredwhenexaminingthesedata.Wediscusshowthesefactorscaninformlocalwildlifemanagementandecologicalconservationplanningefforts.CougarspaceuseonalandscapewithhighlevelsofanthropogenicdisturbanceinsouthcentralUtah
JulieK.Young,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;[email protected]
PeterJ.Mahoney,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:Weevaluatedcougar(Pumaconcolor)spaceuseinrelationtogeneralpatternsofhumanlandscapeuseonMonroeMountaininsouthcentralUtah.CougarsonMonroeMountainareexposedtoheavyhumanpressurebothdirectlyduringchase,limited‐entry,andharvestobjectiveseasonsduringthewinterandspringandmoreindirectlyduetotrafficassociatedwithrecreationalOHVactivityandgamehunterusethroughoutthesummerandfall.Toassesshowcougarsrespondtohumanactivity,weevaluatedrelativeselection(RSFwithausedvs.availabledesign)usingBayesiangeneralizedlinearmixedmodelswithweaklyinformativepriorsandarandomeffectofindividualtoaccountfordifferencesinindividualsamplingintensity.Seasonalhomeranges(99%isopleths)weregeneratedforeachindividualwithinourdatasetusingakerneldensityestimatorwithapluginbandwidthestimationalgorithm.Availabilitywasestimatedsystematicallyusingacompletecensusof30meterpixelswithineachhomerange.Distancetosecondaryandtertiaryroads,distancetowater,distancetonearesthumanresidence,ruggedness,aspect,slope,andvegetativecoverwerecalculatedforeachusedandavailablepointwithinthedatasetandutilizedasexplanatoryfixedeffectsintheRSFmodel.Wecomparedcougarresponsetoroadsandhumanresidenceacrossseasonsandbetweennightanddayinanefforttoidentifypatternsofcougarresponsetohumanactivity.Ourresultssuggestillustratetheindirectimpactshumanshaveoncougarsandtheneedformorestudiesthatdirectlyaccountforhumanactivitywhenevaluatingspatialandhabitatuse.
Page 79
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
78
Livestockandlions:Aresearchprogramtolearncoexistencestrategies
HarleyG.Shaw;[email protected]
DavidJ.Mattson,PeopleandCarnivores;[email protected] (Presenter)
ElizabethA.Haynes,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected]
SethM.Wilson,PeopleandCarnivores;[email protected]
Abstract:Conservationofecologicallyfunctionalpopulationsofcougars(Pumaconcolor)isdependent,inpart,onreducingconflictswithlivestockproducersandreducingrelatedpreventativeorretaliatorykills.Appreciabledepredationoflivestockbycougarsislargelyrestrictedtoeithersheeportocowcalvesinwarmsemi‐aridtoaridregions.OurpreliminaryinvestigationsinArizonasuggestthatterrainruggedness,warmth,andariditytogetherengenderhusbandrypracticesthatleadtogreateravailabilityofvulnerablecowcalves.Wehypothesizethatpolledbreeds,cow‐calfoperations,lowstockingdensities,andyear‐roundbreedingandcalvingareattherootofproblematicdynamics,inplacesamplifiedbysource‐sinkdynamicsthatrecruityoungdispersingcougarsintolivestock‐producingareas.Giventhepotentialimportanceofcoexistencebetweenlivestockandcougarstolong‐termconservationofcougarpopulations,weadvocatealarge‐scaleresearchefforttotesttheefficacyofdifferenthusbandrypracticesinreducingcougardepredation.Suchaprogramwouldideallyfocusonrangeswithhistoriesofdepredationandemploycontrolsthroughapaireddesign.Candidatetreatmentswouldincludeuseofmoreaggressivehornedbreeds,abbreviationofbreedingandcalvingseasons,andconcentrationofcalvingcowsunderconditionswheretheycouldbegivengreaterprotection.Executionofsuchstudieswould,ataminimum,dependuponrecruitingrancherstoparticipateandfindingfinancialresourcestoalleviatetheeconomiccostsandrisksofparticipation.Werecommendthatanysuchstudyincludeassessmentofeconomicfeasibilityandpracticalitytotherancher,aswellaspotentialimpactonrangecondition.
Page 80
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
79
Session9:
FelidsandHumans,Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 81
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
80
Floridapantherrecovery:Livestockdepredation,predationriskmaps,andnewapproachestocompensationprograms
CaitlinJacobs,UniversityofFlorida,Dept.WildlifeEcologyandConservation;[email protected]
MartinMain,UniversityofFlorida,Dept.WildlifeEcologyandConservation;[email protected]
Abstract:CalfdepredationbythefederallyendangeredFloridapanther(Pumaconcolorcoryi)onranchesinsouthwestFloridaisanimportantissuebecauseranchesprovidehabitatcriticaltopantherrecovery.Asthepantherpopulationincreases,conflictbetweenranchersandpantherswilllikelyincreaseaswell.Tobetterunderstandthisconflict,thegoalsofthisstudyweretoquantifycalfdepredationbypanthersontworanchesinsouthwestFlorida,identifyfactorsthatinfluencepredationrisk,anddeveloppredationriskmapstoinformmanagementdecisions.Tomonitorcalflossweeartagged409calveswithVHFtransmittersontworanchesduring2011‐2013.Weevaluatedcalfmortalitiesforcauseofdeathandplacedcameratrapsatcachesitestoidentifyindividualpanthers.WeusedArcGISandFragstatstoquantifylandscapevariablesaroundeachkillsiteandforeachranch.WedevelopedpredationriskmapswithMaxEntusinglandscapevariablesandpantherGPSdata.Calfdepredationbypanthersvariedbetweenranches,withanaveragecalflosstopanthersof5.3%/yearonRanchAand0.5%/yearonRanchB.Pantherskilledcalvesrangingfrom<1weekoldand<25kgto>8monthsoldand>150kg.Cameratrapdatarevealedthatpanthersofdifferentagesandsexeskilledcalvesandthatsomepanthersmademultiplekills.LandscapeanalysisindicatedthatRanchAcontainedagreaterpercentageandpatchdensityofuplandforest,greaterconnectivitybetweenforestpatches,greateredgedensity,andsmallerpatchesofimprovedpasturethanRanchB.TheseresultssuggestthatthelandscapeonRanchAmayprovideamoreoptimalhuntingenvironmentforpanthers.MaxEntresultssuggestthatpredationriskmapscaninformconflictmitigationstrategiesandpotentiallyhelptostructurecompensationprogramsthatarebasedonlandscapefeaturesratherthanonverifiedkills.Conflictwithoutend:Cougardepredationineast‐centralArizona
DavidJ.Mattson,PeopleandCarnivores;[email protected]
ErinSavage,AppalachianVoices,[email protected]
SusanG.Clark,SchoolofForestry&EnvironmentalStudies,YaleUniversity;[email protected]
Abstract:GrahamandGreenleecountiesineast‐centralArizonahaveexperiencedhighlevelsofcougar(Pumaconcolor)predationoncowcalvesforatleastthelast20
Page 82
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
81
years.Killsofcougarsfordepredationcontrolinthesetwocomparativelysmallcountieshaveaccountedfor62%ofthestate’stotal.Ouranalysisofthiscasesuggeststhathighlevelsofdepredationarenotadequatelyexplainedbydensitiesofcougars,cattle,ornativeprey.Morelikely,thispatternofdepredationconflictisduetohusbandrypracticesrootedineconomicnecessityandunproductiverangeconditions,coupledwithinstitutionalizeddepredationcontrol.Moststakeholdersactiveinthiscaseseemtosharetheviewthatnatureisprimarilysomethingtobedominatedandutilized.Butdivergentgoalsarisefromdifferencesintheextenttowhichstakeholdersvalueconservationoflionsforhunting,prioritizelivestockrearingforprofit,ordistrustgovernment.Wefoundlittleevidencetosuggestthatcurrentpracticesandperspectivesservedanyone’smaterialinterests.Calflossesandkillsoflionsfordepredationcontrolpersistathighlevelswhichpotentiallyjeopardizeregionalsporthuntingandconservationoflions.Currentmanagementoflionsaffirmsprevailingworldviews,whichmakeslethalcontroloflionsa“necessity,”butwithoutresolvinganyon‐the‐groundproblems.Althoughalternativescanbeimagined,limitedresources,limitedsalience,andprevailingworldviewswillverylikelyperpetuatecurrentdynamicsintheshortterm.Longerterm,patternsofdepredationsandassociatedhumanbehaviorsinthisregionwillmorelikelybechangedbylarge‐scaleclimaticandeconomicforcescurrentlyreconfiguringwildlifemanagementandranchinginthesemi‐aridWest.AnintegratedregionaloutreachandresearchmodelforwildlifeconservationacrosstheSanFranciscoBayArea
ZaraMcDonald,FelidaeConservationFund;[email protected]
AnneM.Orlando,FelidaeConservationFund;[email protected]
AllyC.Nauer,FelidaeConservationFund;[email protected]
Abstract:TheSanFranciscoBayAreahostsavibrantandexpandingeconomyandanenvironmentallyconcernedpopulace.Heavilydevelopedareasandcongestedhighwaysabutcriticalnetworksofprotectedopenspaceandlargeworkingranches.Weprovideanoverviewofregion‐widecollaborativeeffortstomodel,designandconservefunctionalnetworksofcontiguouswildlifehabitat.Yet,inadditiontoscientificallyvalidconservationdesign,sustainingwildlifecommunitiesrequiresaddressingdifferingconcernsforurbanedgeversusruralresidents.WedescribethecombinedecologicalresearchandoutreachmodelwehavedesignedtoincorporatethesedistinctpopulacesintotheworkoftheBayAreaPumaProject,alandscape‐scaleresearchandconservationprogram.Urbanedgepumaconservationneedsincludeidentifyinglandscapemovementbarriers;providingsafehighwaycrossings;protectinglandscape‐scalecorridors;alleviatingdepredationonpetsandhobbyanimals;identifyingandalleviatinginadvertentpoisoning;addressinghumanlevelsoffearanddefiningsafetythreats;anddevelopingprotocolsforremovingpumasfromhigh‐densityresidentialareas.Incontrast,wherethesamepumas’
Page 83
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
82
homerangesintersectruralranches,potentialimpactsonlivestock,interactionswithdeerpopulation,andoccasionally,inadvertentpoisoningbecomethemainconcerns.WepresentdatafrompumaGPScollars,GIS‐basedanalyses,andfindingsfrom3seasonsofregion‐widecamera‐trappingthatdocumentedvaryingoccupancyandactivitypatternsofpumasandothermammalsbetweenurbanedgeandruralenvironments.Wedescribehowwehaveusedthesefindingsandinputfromdiversehumancommunitiestodynamicallylinkresearchwithruralandurbanstakeholderoutreachandinvolvement.Theprojectthuscreatestheimpetusforlandscapeconservationoutcomeswithintheprocessofconductingaresearchprogram,fromchoosingappropriatequestionstoconductingfieldwork,andfromanalysistocollaborativemanagementplanning.BanquetSpeech
MichaelL.Wolfe,ProfessorEmeritus,UtahStateUniversityAbstract:Thisnarrativeweavesataleofhumankind’srelationshipwithpredatoryanimalslargelywithinthecontextofwesternculture.Fromprehistorictimeshumansdevelopedconflictedrelationshipswithlargecarnivores,perhapsstemmingfrommutualkleptoparasatismandbiophobia.Withthedevelopmentofpastoralandagrariansocietiestheserelationshipsmorphedintoaculturalenmitywithcertainlargepredatorsincorporatedintolegendandfolkloreandabettedbytheadventofnon‐animisticmonotheisticreligions.However,notalllargepredatorsperceivedwereviewedequallywiththewolfbeingalmostuniversallyreviledandlionsandbearswereviewedinsomewhatmorefavorableterms.EuropeancolonistsbroughtthesetraditionswiththemwhentheysettledNorthAmericaandappliedtheanti‐predatormentalityvigorouslyintheirconquestoftheAmericanfrontier.Thisresultedinavirtualpogromagainstpredators,andtheneareradicationofseverallargecarnivoresbythe20thcentury.Withthedemiseoflargerpredators,thecoyotebecametheprincipaltargetofpredatorcontrolefforts.However,thereemergedinthelatterhalfofthatcenturyamoreenlightenedperceptionoflargecarnivores,largelyoccasionedbytheresearchandteachingsofseveralvisionaryecologistsandthewritingsofseveralpopularauthors.Changingpublicattitudesresultedinoftencontroversialeffortstoprotectandrestorelargecarnivores.Thepastseveraldecadeshavewitnessedaveritableexplosioninpredation‐relatedresearchenhancedbysignificantadvancesintechnologyandairedpubliclyinmodernmedia.Thisworkandaparadigmshiftinecologyhaveresultedindevelopmentandslowacceptanceofamodernsynthesis,wherebypredatorsareviewedintheirappropriateanddiverseecologicalrolesneitherasuniversalvillainsormessiahs.However,attitudestowardspredatoryanimalsremainsharplypolarizedandsignificantchallengespersist.Theseincluderangeexpansionorrecolonizationbycoyotesandcougarsaswellconcernsforhumansafetypromptedbythepresenceofpotentiallydangerousanimalsinnearurbanenvironments.
Page 84
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
83
Session10:
Non‐invasiveTechniques
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Page 85
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
84
EstimatingCougarDensitiesinnortheastOregonUsingConservationDetectionDogs
GregoryA.Davidson,FindItDetectionDogs;[email protected]
DarrenA.Clark,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlife,OregonStateUniversity;[email protected] .
BruceK.Johnson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
LisetteP.Waits,DepartmentofFishandWildlifeSciences,UniversityofIdaho;[email protected]
JenniferR.Adams,DepartmentofFishandWildlifeSciences,UniversityofIdaho,;[email protected]
Abstract:Estimatingdensitiesofcougar(Pumaconcolor)isimportantformanagingcougarsandtheirpreybutremainschallengingduetocougar’selusiveandsolitarybehavior.Traditionalmethodsforestimatingabundanceanddensityofcougarsrequireseveralyearsofextensiveandexpensivemark‐recapturework.Toevaluateanon‐invasive,geneticcapture‐recapturemethodtoestimatecougarpopulationsizeanddensity,wesurveyeda220‐km2areausingconservationdetectiondogstrainedtolocatescatovera4‐weeksamplingperiodinnortheastOregon.Wecollected272scatsamplesandconductedDNAanalysison249samplesfromwhichwedeterminedindividualidentificationfrom73samplesthatrepresented21cougars(9malesand12females).Weevaluated4modelstoestimatecougardensities:Hugginsclosedpopulationmark‐recapture(Huggins),CAPWIRE,multipledetectionswithPoisson(MDP),andspatiallyexplicitcapturerecapture(SECR).Populationestimatesforcougarsusingourstudyareawere26(95%CI=22–35,9malesand17females)fromHugginsmodels,24(95%CI=21–30,9malesand15females)fromCAPWIRE,and27(95%CI=24–42,9males,18females)fromtheMDPmodel.Weaccountedfortheedgeeffectindensityestimatescausedbyindividualswhosehomerangesincludedonlyaportionofthesurveygridbybufferingthestudyareausingthemeanhomerangeradiusof8cougarsequippedwithGlobalPositioningSystemcollarsonornearthestudyarea.Weestimateddensitiesof4.6cougars/100km2(CI=3.8–8.3)fortheHugginsmodel,4.8cougars/100km2(CI=4.2–7.8)fortheMDPmodel,4.2cougars/100km2(CI=3.3–5.3)fortheCAPWIREmodel,and5.0cougars/100km2(CI=3.2–7.7)fortheSECRmodel.Ourresultssuggestedestimatingcougardensitiesusingscatdetectiondogscouldbefeasibleatabroaderscaleatconsiderablylesseffortoverashorterdurationthantraditionalmark‐recapturemethods.
Page 86
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
85
DNA‐baseddietidentificationofmountainlionsinsouthwesternArizona
JohnClemons,ArizonaDesertBighornSheepSociety;[email protected]
AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected]
MelanieCulver,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected]
Abstract:Mountainlion(Pumaconcolor)dietshavelongbeenasubjectofcontroversyandhavebeenstudiedusingvariousmethodsinthepast30years.Mostearlyattemptstoascertainpredatordietwerefocusedonmethodsemployinganalysesofcontentsinfecesbasedonmorphologicalidentificationofhairandbonefragments.Thesemethodscanbesubjecttosignificantvariationinindividualinterpretationandcanlackincertaintyofidentificationofthepreyspeciesconsumedbypredators.Inthisstudyweemploygeneticanalysesofscatcontentstoidentifymountainlionprey.Weopportunisticallycollected152scatsamplessuspectedtobeofmountainlioninoriginfrommountainrangesinsouthwesternandsouthcentralArizonaduring2006–2012.Weamplifiedandsequenceda472bpfragmentofthemitochondrialcytochromebgenetoidentifypredatorspecies.Weconfirmed77(50.7%)scatstobefrommountainlions.Wedismantledthesemountainlionscatstorecoverboneandconnectivetissuefragmentscontainedtherein.Wethenpulverizedthesefragmentsinafreezermillandidentifiedpreyspeciesalsousingthecytochromebgene.Ourpreliminaryresultsdemonstratedthatmountainliondietconsistedof44%muledeer(Odocoileushemionus)and27%desertbighornsheep(Oviscanadensis)asthemajorpreyitems,amongotherminorpreyitems.Withseasonaldivisionofdiet,weobservedapotentialpositivecorrelationbetweenmountainlionpredationandthedesertbighornsheeplambingseason,andaninverserelationshipbetweenmuledeeranddesertbighornsheeppredation.WeconcludedthatDNA‐basedidentificationisaneffectivetoolingeneratingdataonmountainliondiets,andsuchdatacanbeusefulforwildlifemanagement,particularlyinmodelingtheimpactofpredationandvulnerabilityofpreyspeciestomountainlions.
Page 87
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
86
PumaPlex:Arapidandhigh‐throughputmethodtogenotypesinglenucleotidepolymorphismsinmountainliontissuesandscats
RobertR.Fitak,InstitutfürPopulationsgenetik,VeterinärmedizinischeUniversitätWien,Vienna,Austria;[email protected]
AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected]
MelanieCulver,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;[email protected]
Abstract:Populationgeneticanalyseshavebecomeapowerfultoolfortheconservationandmanagementofwildlifepopulations.However,themostcommongeneticmarkers,microsatellites,oftenincurahighcostofexamination,sufferfromhomoplasy,andproducedatadifficulttocompareacrossstudies.Recently,alternativegeneticmarkers,calledsinglenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs),havereceivedmuchattentionfortheiranalyticalsimplicity,high‐throughputcapabilities,consistencyacrossstudies,andpotentialutilityinancient,degraded,andnon‐invasivelycollectedsamples.Inourstudywedesignedahigh‐throughputassay(calledPumaPlex)tosimultaneouslygenotype26SNPsinmountainlions(Pumaconcolor).Todate,wehavegenotypedmorethan700mountainlions,including~500individualsfromArizona.OurresultsfromusingPumaPlexproducedcomparableresultstothatofmicrosatellites,withasubstantialdecreaseinoverallcostsandturnaroundtime.Additionally,wedirectlycomparedgenotypingsuccessofPumaPlexwithapanelof12well‐knownFeliscatus(FCA)microsatellitelociin46mountainlionscatsamples.WefoundthatmeasuresofgenotypingsuccessweresignificantlyimprovedforPumaPlexrelativetomicrosatellites.TheadvantagesofPumaPlexcomparedwithtraditionalmicrosatellitegenotypingmakeitavaluableadditiontoexistingmethodstoassistgeneticmonitoringandmanagementofmountainlionsthroughouttheirrange.
Page 88
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
87
Inthelion’sfootsteps:MonitoringMountainlionusinganon‐invasiveandcost‐effectivefootprintidentificationtechnique
ZoeCJewell,Visitingresearchscientist,NicholasSchooloftheEnvironment,DukeUniversity;[email protected]
SkyKAlibhai,Visitingresearchscientist,NicholasSchooloftheEnvironment,DukeUniversity;[email protected]
JonahW.Evans,Mammalogist,TexasParksandWildlife;[email protected]
Abstract:Mountainlionsaresolitary,elusiveandcoververylargeareas,andasaresult,itisverydifficulttocollectreliabledataonpopulationcharacteristics(parameters)anddistribution.Whiletelemetryand/orcamera‐trappingtechniquescanprovideusefulinformation,theyarerelativelyexpensiveanddifficulttodeployoverlargeareas.Also,ifmonitoringdataaretobereliableandreflectthetruepopulationdynamicsthenthemethodofcollectionmusthaveminimalornoimpactonnaturalbehaviororphysiologyofthetargetanimal.Theauthorsdevelopedafootprintidentificationtechnique(FIT),initiallyforusewithblackandwhiterhinoinsouthernAfrica,andhavesinceadapteditforusewithfelidsincludingBengalandAmurtiger,Africanlionandcheetah.Digitalimagesofmultipleleft‐hindfootprintsfromindividualanimalsarecapturedusingabasicdigitalcamera.TheyareuploadedtoanFITadd‐inforJMPdatavisualizationsoftwarefromSASInstitute.Featureextractionallows>120measurementsoflength,angleandareatobecollected.Usingacustomizedcross‐validatedpairwisediscriminantanalysiswithWard’sclusteringtechnique,thefootprintscanbeclassifiedbyindividual,sex,age‐class,andspecieswithahighdegreeofaccuracy.JewellandAlibhaihavecollaboratedwithJonahEvans,MammalogistforTexasParksandWildlife,toadaptFITforuseinmonitoringfree‐rangingmountainlionpopulations.Theyhavecollected535footprintsfrom35captive(16:19)animalsofknownsexandidentitytoformtheinitialreferencedatabase.Accuraciesof>90%havebeenobtainedinclassifyingbyindividualandsex.FITisinexpensive,non‐invasive,andprovideshighaccuracywhencomparedwithothermethods.Thistoolcouldpotentiallybeusedtoestimatemountainlionpopulationsatdramaticallyreducedcostsinareaswithsuitablesubstrate.Theauthorswillinvitethosewithaccesstofree‐rangingmountainliontrackstojointhiseffortbycontributingfootprintsforfieldvalidationtrials
Page 89
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
88
UseofcameratrapstoassesspreyavailabilityanddistributionrelativetomountainlionpredationintheDavisMountains,Texas
CatherineC.Dennison,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity;[email protected]
DanaMilani,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
RonThompson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
BertGeary,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
PatriciaMoodyHarveson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
LouisA.Harveson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
Abstract:WeusedanarrayofcameratrapsandinformationcollectedfromGPScollaredanimalstotesttherelationshipbetweenpreyavailabilityandmountainlionpredationintheDavisMountainsofwestTexas.Cameratrapswereusedtoestimatetherelativeabundanceanddistributionofmountainlionsandtheirprey.GPScollardatawasusedtoidentifylikelykillsitesandfieldinvestigationsconfirmedwhetherornotakillwaspresent,aswellasthespeciesthatwaskilled.Wecomparedpreyavailabilityacrossthestudysitetothecompositionofallkillsitesobserved.Cameratrapdatawasusedtoinvestigatethedistributionofprey,includinghabitatpreferencesforseveralcategoriesincludingelevation,terrainruggedness,andecologicalsite.Wealsolookedatindividualkillsitesandcomparedthosetotherelativepreyabundancebasedoncameratrapdatainthemoreimmediateareasurroundingthekill.Whileferalhogswerethemostabundantpreyspeciesoncameratraps(composing23%oftotalanimalsobserved)theywerethefourthmostcommonspeciespreyeduponbymountainlionsaftermuledeer,elk,andwhite‐taileddeer.Weobservedsignificantdifferencesbetweenthedietsofthemaleandfemalecatspresentonthestudysite,aswellasdifferencesindietbasedontheageoftheanimal.However,wealsonotedvariationinthedietpreferencesofindividualmountainlionsthatfallwithinthesamesexandagegroups.Abetterunderstandingofhowlocalpreyavailabilitybothonafineandbroadscaleaffectsmountainlionpredationwillhelplandmanagerstobettermanageforbothmountainlionsandtheirprey.
Page 90
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
89
Session11:
ManagementStrategies
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild.PresentedbyMarkLotz
Page 91
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
90
Conservationofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inarapidlyurbanizinglandscape;researchinformingtheneedformoreaction
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
JessicaN.Sanchez,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
ChristineK.Johnson,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
RandyBotta,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;[email protected]
PatrickR.Huber,InformationCenterfortheEnvironment,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
ScottA.Morrison,TheNatureConservancy;[email protected]
BrianCohen,TheNatureConservancy;[email protected]
WalterM.Boyce,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;[email protected]
Abstract:Wide‐ranginglargecarnivoressuchaspumasposemyriadchallengesforconservation,perhapsespeciallyinurbanizinglandscapes.Weconducteda12‐yearstudyofpumas(Pumaconcolor)insouthwesternCalifornia,USA,anareathatisthefocusofmultiplelandscape‐scaleconservationplanningeffortsaimedatprotectinganetworkofhabitatreservesamidstextensiveurban,suburbanandexurbandevelopment.Themajorityofurban(74%)andrural(79%)residentsinthisregionagreedthatpumasareasignofahealthyenvironment,and>60%saidpumashavearighttoexistwherevertheyoccur.However,despiteprotectionfromrecreationalhunting,annualsurvivalwassimilartoheavilyhuntedpopulations,andhumanactivities,especiallyvehiclecollisionsanddepredationpermits,weretheleadingcausesofdeath.Ouranalysesshowedthatdespitelandscape‐scaleconservationplanningthathasbeenvigorouslypursuedinthisregion,habitatfragmentationhasresultedindemographicisolationandgeneticrestrictionandthedefactocreationoftwopumapopulationsseparatedbyaninterstatehighway(I‐15).Dominantcausesofdeathvariedsignificantlybetweenthetwopopulations,andbygender,withvehiclescausingoverhalfofmortalitieswestofI‐15intheSantaAnaMountains.Ourdatahighlighttheimportanceandurgencyofprotectingandrestoringwildlifecorridorsifpumapopulationsaretobeviableinfragmentinglandscapes.Wediscussapplicationsofourdatatoeffortstoreducehuman‐causedmortalityofpuma,includingcorridorplanning,highwayimprovements,andpublicoutreach.Withouttheseexpensivesolutions,intensivemanagementoftheSantaAnaMountainpopulationmaybenecessary,possiblyinperpetuity.Wepredictthatpositivehumanattitudestowardpumasinthisregionwillhavetobecombinedwithconcertedeffortsbyconservationandgovernmentalorganizationsinordertoavoidthisoutcome.
Page 92
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
91
Predation‐specificresourceselectionbycougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana
LinseyW.Blake,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;[email protected]
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;[email protected] .
Abstract:Cougarsareanambushpredatorwhoselandscapeselectionandpredationpatternsintertwine.Wherefeasible,modificationoflandscapefeaturescouldmanipulatepredationrisk.Ourobjectivewastoexaminepredation‐specificresourceselectionattwodifferentscales(fineandcoarse)inthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.Wevisitedclusters(n=388)ofGPSlocationsfrom5radio‐collaredcougarsduring2011–2012tolocatepreyremains.Itisoftenimpossibletoidentifyspecifickilllocations,somanystudieshavereliedonthecharacteristicsofcachesitestodescribekillsitecharacteristics,likelyresultinginsomeinaccuracies.Toavoidthis,whenpossiblewebacktrackedfromcachelocationstokillpointsandusedafine‐scaleanalysistoexaminelandscapecharacteristicswithin25moftheseconfirmedkillpoints(n=30).Atthisscale,killsiteshadlowerhorizontalvisibilityandelevationsthanrandomsites,andweremoreapttobeinjuniper‐mountainmahoganyvegetationandlesslikelytobeingrasslands.Forourcoarsescaleanalysisofpredationriskweusedourentiredatasetofkills(n=195)byusingthe95%uppercut‐offpointoftheknowndistances‐dragged(94.9m)tobuffercachessites,therebycreatingriskzoneswhichhadahighlikelihoodofcontainingthekill.Wemodeledcougarpredationsiteselectionbyconstructingresourceselectionfunctionsfortheseriskzones.Thetopmodelforsummerriskzonesconsistedofvegetationclass,distance‐to‐waterandaquadratictermforslope,whilethetopmodelforwinterriskzonesincludedvegetationclassandelevation.Localwildlifemanagerswhohaveaninterestinreducingpredationtobighornsheepwillbeabletointersectthepredationriskresourceselectionfunctionswithbighornsheephabitattoguidehabitatmodificationeffortsaimedatincreasinghorizontalvisibilitytoreducetheriskofcougarpredation.
Page 93
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
92
TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild
MarkLotz,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;[email protected]
KarenMeeks,WhiteOak;[email protected]
Abstract:TheFloridapanther(Pumaconcolorcoryi)isanisolatedsubspeciesofpumawithabreedingpopulationrestrictedtoapproximately800,000hectaresinsouthernFlorida.Geneticrestorationeffortsinthemid‐1990’sincreasedheterozygosityandweresuccessfulathelpingthepopulationreboundto100‐160adults.Nevertheless,thecurrentsizeofthispopulationisinsufficienttoensureageneticallydiverse,self‐sustainingpopulationandindividualpanthersstillrepresentasignificantproportionofthegeneticstructureinthewild.TheFloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission,incooperationwithWhiteOak,hasraisedten(4M,6F)orphanedorinjureddependant‐agedkittensandreleasedthembacktothewildwheretheyhadanopportunitytoberecruitedintothebreedingpopulation.Femalerecruitmenthasbeenexcellentandmosthaveproducedlitters.Additionally,severalofthecaptiveraisedfemale’soffspringhavebeendocumentedtoproducelitters.Malerecruitmentresultshavebeenmixed.Wedescribecaptivehabitatconditions,feedingregimens,staff‐pantherinteractionprotocols,andpre‐releaseconsiderationsimplementedwhilepanthersarebeingheldcaptivethatappeartobecriticalforimprovingtheprobabilityofsuccessfulrecruitmentofindividualsbackintothewildpopulation.Investinginindividuals,especiallyinsmall,isolated,andendangeredpopulationshasgeneticconsequencesforconservation,management,andrecovery.Asotherstateagenciesdevelopalternatepoliciesfordealingwithorphanedpumas,theknowledgegainedinFloridamayassistinincreasingthelikelihoodofsuccessfulreleases.EffectsofRemedialSportHuntingonCougarComplaintsandLivestockDepredations
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLaboratory,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity;
KaylieA.Peebles,LargeCarnivoreConservationLaboratory,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
MarkE.Swanson,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity
Abstract:Remedialsporthuntingofpredatorsisoftenusedtoreducepredatorpopulationsandassociatedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Weassessedthe
Page 94
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
93
effectsofremedialsporthuntingonreducingcougarcomplaintsandlivestockdepredationsinWashingtonfrom2005to2010(6years).Thenumberofcomplaints,livestockdepredations,cougarsharvested,estimatedcougarpopulations,humanpopulationandlivestockpopulationswerecalculatedforall39countiesand136GMUs(gamemanagementunits)inWashington.Thedatawasthenanalyzedusinganegativebinomialgeneralizedlinearmodeltotestfortheexpectednegativerelationshipbetweenthenumberofcomplaintsanddepredationsinthecurrentyearwiththenumberofcougarsharvestedthepreviousyear.Asexpected,wefoundthatcomplaintsanddepredationswerepositivelyassociatedwithhumanpopulation,livestockpopulation,andcougarpopulation.However,contrarytoexpectationswefoundthatcomplaintsanddepredationsweremoststronglyassociatedwithcougarsharvestedthepreviousyear.Theoddsofincreasedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredationsincreaseddramatically(36to240%)withincreasedcougarharvest.Wesuggestthatincreasedyoungmaleimmigration,socialdisruptionofcougarpopulations,andassociatedchangesinspaceusebycougars‐causedbyincreasedhuntingresultedintheincreasedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Widespreadindiscriminatehuntingdoesnotappeartobeaneffectivepreventativeandremedialmethodforreducingpredatorcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Abundanceofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inthenorthernSierraMadreOccidental,Mexico:arewereadytohaveaharvestquota?
HeliCoronelArellano.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;[email protected]
NalleliE.LaraDiaz.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;[email protected] .
CarlosA.LopezGonzalez.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;[email protected] .
Abstract:PumasinMexicoalthoughconsideragamespeciesaretreatedasvarmints.Thisnonglamorousstatusistheresultofpredatorcontrolcampaignsassociatedtolivestockdepredation.Nevertheless,thereisnoaccountingtothenumberofmountainlionskilledasthereisnodirectbenefittotheranchingcommunity.OurobjectivewastodeterminethenumberoflionspresentinthelandscapeofthenorthernSierraMadreOccidental(SMOcc)toprovidebaselineinformationtoassistmanagementagenciesintheregion.OurstudyareaisthenorthernSMOccincludingNWChihuahuaandNESonora.ThehabitatsincludeamosaicofSonoranDesert,grasslands,oakwoodlands,andChihuahuandesert.Weusedcameratrapstoassesstheabundanceoflionsindifferenthabitats.Pumaabundancerangefrom1to4ind/100km2witha1M:1Fsexratio,usingtheseresults,managementunitsshouldhaveaminimumsurfaceof1250to5000km2
(habitatdependent).Additionalvariablesinthisproposalshouldincorporatepreyabundance,livestockproductionandconservationstatusoftheland.Theranching
Page 95
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
94
communityshouldfavorasustainablehuntingscenarioinsteadofthetraditionalpredatorcontrolbysupportingoutfitterguidesdedicatedtothisspecies.ResearchtoRegulation:CougarSocialBehaviorasaGuideforManagement
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
GaryM.Koehler,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
BrianN.Kertson,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,WashingtonStateUniversity
Abstract:Cougar(Pumaconcolor)populationsareachallengetoestimatebecauseoflowdensitiesandthedifficultymarkingandmonitoringindividuals.Asaresult,theirmanagementisoftenbasedonimperfectdata.Currentstrategiesrelyonasource–sinkconcept,whichtendstoresultinspatiallyclumpedharvestwithinmanagementzonesthataretypicallyapproximately10,000km2.Agenciesoftenimplementquotaswithinthesezonesanddesignatemanagementobjectivestoreduceormaintaincougarpopulations.Weproposeanapproachforcougarmanagementfoundedontheirbehaviorandsocialorganization,designedtomaintainanolderagestructurethatshouldpromotepopulationstability.Toachievetheseobjectives,hunterharvestwouldbeadministeredwithinzonesapproximately1,000km2insizetodistributeharvestmoreevenlyacrossthelandscape.Wealsoproposereplacingtheterm'quota'with'harvestthreshold'becausequotasoftenconnoteaharvesttargetorgoalratherthanathresholdnottoexceed.InWashington,USA,wherethesource–sinkconceptisimplemented,researchshowsthathighharvestratesmaynotaccomplishtheintendedpopulationreductionobjectivesduetoimmigration,resultinginanalteredpopulationagestructureandsocialorganization.Werecommendaharveststrategybasedonapopulationgrowthrateof14%andaresidentadultdensityof1.7cougars/100km2thatrepresentprobableaveragevaluesforwesternpopulationsofcougars.Ourproposaloffersmanagersanopportunitytopreservebehavioralanddemographicattributesofcougarpopulations,providerecreationalharvest,andaccomplishavarietyofmanagementobjectives.Webelievethisscience‐basedapproachtocougarmanagementiseasytoimplement,incursfewifanyaddedcosts,satisfiesagencyandstakeholderinterests,assuresprofessionalcredibility,andmaybeappliedthroughouttheirrangeinwesternNorthAmerica.
Page 96
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
95