Hunt for consumption not to extinction Pride Campaign Santi “Joy” Saypanya CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION.

Hunt for consumption not to extinction Pride Campaign

Santi “Joy” Saypanya

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Nam Et – Phou Louey NPA

The Nam – Phou Louey NPA is one highest priority tiger conservation sites.

Located in North Eastern part of Lao PDR. It is believed to be the last home for biggest population of tigers in the country and only confirmed source site in Indochina.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Core Zone 3,000km2

The Strategy in Nam Et – Phou Louey NPA

Our campaign has protected the prey of the last tiger population in Laos by celebrating hunters who hunt wild animals legally and by promoting the reporting of poachers who threaten the food security of local communities.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Nam Et – Phou Louey NPA Target Audiences

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

1. Illegal hunters 2. General villagers3. Government officials

General villagers

Nam Et – Phou Louey NPA

Theory of ChangeResults & Critical Analysis

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

CRConservation Result

Goal

Prey population will increase 15%. By 2012

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Results

General villagers know that muntjac and wild pig are important food for people

Campaign site

Control site

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Results

General villagers don’t allow outsiders who come to hunt in their village

Campaign site

Co

ntr

ol s

ite

ICInterpersonal communications

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

ResultsGeneral villagers have talked about how to increase muntjac and wild pig population in their village use area

Ca

mp

aig

n s

ite

Control site

ICInterpersonal communications

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Critical Analysis•the importance of key five tiger prey species,• feel ownerships of the species don’t allow outsiders to hunt in their village use zone, • have talked to each other how to increase the species which lead to their behavior change.

Barrier RemovalBR

ICAttitude

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

ResultsGeneral villagers reported illegal activities to Wildlife Crime Unit (WCU) and then WCU responds to reports proactively resulting in confiscations, fines and captivity.

Critical AnalysisThis activity helped removing the barrier in changing behavior, if general villagers would like to change their behavior by reporting , but no one respond their report, they would not report again.

75%

Barrier Removal Deep Dive 1. The assignment of officers who will work with Wildlife Crime Unit by

concerned government agencies2. The assignments of committee to oversee and are responsible for the

WCU and its government agencies. 3. Reassign WCU4. The development of ongoing informant network5. Created hotline number6. The law enforcement7. Gun license8. Quarterly meeting

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

BCBehavior Change

BRBarrier Removal

ICAttitude

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

ResultsMore than 250 hotline call in, 82 calls related to illegal activities.

Critical AnalysisThis is the actual behavior changes that we wanted general villagers to report illegal activities and government officials respond the reports which led the confiscations.

BCAttitude

TRThreat Reduction

BRBarrier Removal

ICAttitude

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Results22 cases were fined, prosecuted and closed.

Critical AnalysisThis actual threat reduction follow by behavior change amount target audiences, general villagers reported illegal activities, government officials, responded the report and enforced the regulation.

BCAttitude

TRThreat Reduction

BRBarrier Removal

ICAttitude

AAttitude

KKnowledge

CRConservation Result

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

ResultsNumber of tiger and it key five prey species will be monitored by 2012.

Critical AnalysisTo measure the success of the some species might take several years especially tiger and its preys. So it would not be able to do it for one campaign period of time.

How we monitored success?

2009

Qualitative & Quantitative Results

Capacity: planning, implementing and assessing.

Constituency: participatory from government counterpart, behavior change in target audiences

Conservation result: Future monitoring.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

How we monitored success?

2009

Lead Agency Partner PerspectiveThis campaign has met my expectations.

Built the foundation of change through theory of change

We see clear examples of success

campaign has paved the way for future activities to result in more conservation impacts and results.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Troy HanselDeputy Country Director, WCS Lao PDR

Where are we and where are we going?

2010 CR Baseline

CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION

Where are your target audiences at on the Theory of Change?

K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR

What are your future goals to move them along the Theory of Change?

K+A+IC: Government officials workshops, BR: The hotlineBC: Illegal hunter workshopTR: Enforce the district regulationCR: Tiger and prey monitoring .

Government officials and illegal hunter

General villagers and Government officials