Top Banner
Human vision Jitendra Malik U.C. Berkeley
50

Human vision

Feb 18, 2016

Download

Documents

natan

Human vision . Jitendra Malik U.C. Berkeley. Cerebral Cortex. Monocular Visual Field: 160 deg (w) X 175 deg (h) Binocular Visual Field: 200 deg (w) X 135 deg (h). Cones and Rods. Receptor density vs eccentricity. Processing in the retina. ON and OFF cells in retinal ganglia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Human vision

Human vision

Jitendra MalikU.C. Berkeley

Page 2: Human vision
Page 3: Human vision

Cerebral Cortex

Page 4: Human vision
Page 5: Human vision

Monocular Visual Field: 160 deg (w) X 175 deg (h)Binocular Visual Field: 200 deg (w) X 135 deg (h)

Page 6: Human vision
Page 7: Human vision

Cones and Rods

Page 8: Human vision
Page 9: Human vision

Receptor density vs eccentricity

Page 10: Human vision

Processing in the retina

Page 11: Human vision

ON and OFF cells in retinal ganglia

Page 12: Human vision

Visual Processing Areas

Page 13: Human vision

The visual system performs

• Measurement of light and spatial relations• Perceptual Organization• Active interaction with environment

Page 14: Human vision

Measurement of light and spatial relations

• Measuring light– Sensitivity over high dynamic range– Gain control results in “Weber Machine”– Sensitivity to contrast rather than absolute

luminance level—discounting the illuminant• Measuring Spatial relations

– Contrast sensitivity function– Vernier Acuity

Page 15: Human vision
Page 16: Human vision

Threshold vs. Intensity

Page 17: Human vision

Weber Contrast Cw = ΔL/LMichelson Contrast CM = (Lmax – Lmin)/2 Lmean

Page 18: Human vision

Why contrast is the right variable..

Page 19: Human vision

Simultaneous Contrast

Page 20: Human vision

Mach Band

Page 21: Human vision

A Mach Band in 1D profile

Page 22: Human vision

Craik-O’Brien-Cornsweet

Page 23: Human vision
Page 24: Human vision

Contrast Sensitivity Function at different luminances

Page 25: Human vision

Receptor density vs eccentricity

Page 26: Human vision

CSF as function of eccentricity

Page 27: Human vision

Cortical Magnification Factor

Page 28: Human vision

Mapping from Retina to V1

Page 29: Human vision

Physiological Optics 1840-1894

Page 30: Human vision

The Empiricist-Nativist debate

Page 31: Human vision

The debate..(and sometimes both were right !)

• Helmholtz argued that perception is unconscious inference. Associations are earned through experience.

• Hering proposed physiological mechanisms—opponent color channels, contrast mechanisms, conjunctive and sisjunctive eye movements..

Page 32: Human vision

The Twentieth Century..

• The Gestalt movement emphasized perceptual organization.– Grouping– Figure/ground – Configuration effects on perception of

brightness and lightness

Page 33: Human vision

Grouping factors

Page 34: Human vision

Grouping Factors

Page 35: Human vision

The Figure-Ground Problem

Page 36: Human vision

Transparency

Page 37: Human vision

Wallach’s Brightness ratios

Page 38: Human vision

Gibson’s ecological optics (1950)

• Emphasized richness of information about shape and surface layout available to a moving observer– Optical flow– Texture Gradients– ( and the classical cues such as stereopsis etc)

Page 39: Human vision
Page 40: Human vision

Measuring Surface Orientation

Page 41: Human vision

Accomodation

Page 42: Human vision

Depth of field of human eye

Page 43: Human vision

Convergence

Page 44: Human vision

Convergence angle vs. distance

Page 45: Human vision

Binocular Stereopsis

Page 46: Human vision

Optical flow for a pilot

Page 47: Human vision

Some Pictorial Cues

Page 48: Human vision

Shading

Page 49: Human vision

Cast Shadows

Page 50: Human vision

Geometry of cast shadows