Human Security: Concept, Relevance and Challenges Pratap Kumar Pathak Human Security: Concept and Meaning Individuals, their families, their communities and the governance structures that they develop have sought throughout the centuries to safeguard human security. During the last decade, human security has become a central concern to many countries, institutions and social actors searching for innovative ways and means of tackling the many non- military threats to peace and security. The rise of human security is usually portrayed as resulting from a growing humanism within the international system that draws on increasingly accepted norms and conventions associated with the human rights and humanitarian laws. Human security has become an issue of concern on the global level since the UN's Universal Declaration of Human rights and other agreements. Transborder and global phenomena that threaten the life or well-being of people have given rise to the concept of human security, which focuses on the individual and his or her security first. With this focus on each and every person, the human security approach thus brings to the forefront the very reason for why assistance is carried out 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Human Security: Concept, Relevance
and ChallengesPratap Kumar
Pathak
Human Security: Concept and MeaningIndividuals, their families, their communities and the
governance structures that they develop have sought
throughout the centuries to safeguard human security. During
the last decade, human security has become a central concern
to many countries, institutions and social actors searching
for innovative ways and means of tackling the many non-
military threats to peace and security. The rise of human
security is usually portrayed as resulting from a growing
humanism within the international system that draws on
increasingly accepted norms and conventions associated with
the human rights and humanitarian laws. Human security has
become an issue of concern on the global level since the
UN's Universal Declaration of Human rights and other
agreements. Transborder and global phenomena that threaten
the life or well-being of people have given rise to the
concept of human security, which focuses on the individual
and his or her security first. With this focus on each and
every person, the human security approach thus brings to the
forefront the very reason for why assistance is carried out
1
in the first place: to improve the lives of fellow citizens
of the world.
The Willy Brandt Commission of 1978 known as North-
South Report focused on ensuring human survival by improving
economic and social conditions of disadvantaged
communities.1 The North-South Report produced in 1980
occupies significant role in conceptualizing human security.
With the theme of "To Ensure Survival", the report seeks
improvements in economic and social conditions in
disadvantaged countries by making the discourse on security
much wider inclusive and highlighted the need for
incorporating the human-centric agenda in global policy
framework.
The concept of human security made its appearance on
the world scene in the mid-90s, a time when new paradigms
were being sought to explain the international system and a
growing theoretical and practical debates were under way on
the traditional concepts of security that drove countries'
action for much of the last century. Since the last decade
of the twentieth century the international community has
been paying increasing attention to humanitarian crises in
the countries of conflict, both, the social and political,
and intervening in order to protect human security. Millions
will be equated with the security of individuals, not just
security of their nations or to put it differently, security
of people, not just security of territory." Dr. Haque played
instrumental role in constructing Human Development Index
(HDI) and was subsequently the moving force behind the more
recent Human Governance Index (HGI)4. Since then, human
security has been receiving more attention from the key
global development institutions and the governance abroad.
UNDP's Human Development Report of 1994 was the first
international document which clearly and explicitly
articulated human security as a concept for future vision
and agenda for action5 with respect to comprehensive human
development. The Report highlighted the new dimensions of
human security by presenting the first comprehensive
analysis of the concept of human security with two major
schools of thought "Freedom from fear" and "Freedom from want".
The Report also identified the four essential
characteristics of human security including
Human security is a universal concern. It is relevant to
people everywhere, in rich nations and poor.
The components of human security are interdependent.
Human security is easier to ensure through early prevention
than latter intervention. It is less costly to meet
these threats upstream than downstream.4 Human Development Centre, Human Development Report for South Asia,1999: the Crisis of Governance, Oxford University Press, 2000, Karachi.5 Dan Henk, Human Security: Relevance and Implications. www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/05summer/henk.pdf
5
Human security is people-centered. It is concerned with how
people live and breathe in a society, how freely they
exercise their many choices, how much access they have
to market and social opportunities - and whether they
live in conflict or in peace.
The Report of the Commission on Global Governance6
entitled "Our Global Neighbourhood-1995" has highlighted that
"…..global security policy should be to prevent conflict and
war and to maintain the integrity of the planet's life-
support systems by eliminating the economic, social,
environmental, political and military conditions that
generate threats to the security of people and the planet."
Amartya Sen7 presents a broad concept of human security
by linking economic as well as developmental aspects to
political and social aspects. In his concept, human security
encompasses "economic safety nets" and "guaranteeing basic
health and education" as well as democratic participation
through "supporting human dignity", "securing continuation
of daily lives" and "security of survival".
Kanti Bajpai8 contributes to conceptualize human
security and provides objective assessment framework for6 The Report of the Commission on Global Governance, Our GlobalNeighbourhood, Oxford University Press, 1995.7 Amartya Sen, Why Human Security, 2000.- www.humansecurity-chs.org/activities/outreach/Sen2000.pdf
auditing human security with respect to two core components
like (a) direct and indirect threats to individual bodily
safety and freedom; and (b) the capacity to deal with
threats namely the fostering of norms, institutions and
democratization in decision making process.
As a conclusion, human security shares the "conceptual
space" of human development, which is likewise people-
centered and multidimensional and is defined in the spaces
of human choices, voices as well as freedoms and rights.
Defining Human Security
The simplest definition of security is "absence of
insecurity and threats". To be secure is to be free from both
fear (of physical, sexual or psychological abuse, violence,
persecution, or death) and from want (of gainful employment,
food, and health). Human Security therefore deals with the
capacity to identify threats, to avoid them when possible,
and to mitigate their effects when they do occur.10 It is an
emerging paradigm for understanding global vulnerabilities
whose proponents challenge the traditional notion of
national security by arguing that the proper referent for
8 Kanti Bajpai, Human Security: Concept and Measurement, Kroc InstituteOccasional Papers, 19:OP:1- www.kroc.nd.edu/ocpapers/op_19_1.PDF). 10 Shahrbanou Tadjbadhsh, Human Security: Concepts and Implications with an Application to Post-Intervention Challenges in Afghanistan, Center for Peace and Conflict Resolution, 2005, p. 5.
7
security should be the individual rather than the state. It
holds that a people-centered, multi-disciplinary
understanding of security involving a number of strategic,
developmental and behavioural studies and research.
According to UN Human Security Commission, the term
"Human Security" entails:
A clear focus on individual
lives in contrast to the notion of "national
security" in the military context.
An understanding and
acknowledgement of the role of civil society,
including private corporations and NGOs.
Human security describes a condition of existence in
which basic material needs are met and in which human
dignity, including meaningful participation in the life of
the community, can be met. Thus, while material sufficiency
lies at the core of human security, in addition the concept
encompasses non-material dimensions to form a qualitative
whole. Human security is oriented towards an active and
substantive notion of democracy, and is directly engaged
with discussions of democracy at all levels, from the local
to the global.11
The Canadian Government has substantiated the task of
defining human security by stating "In essence, human
11 Sabina Alkire, A Conceptual Framework of Human Security, 2003, p.15. www.crise.ox.ac.uk/pubs.workingpaper2.pdf.
8
security means safety for people from both violent and non-
violent threats. It is a condition or state of being
characterized by freedom from pervasive threats to people's
rights, their safety, or even their lives….From a foreign
policy perspective, human security is perhaps best
understood as a shift in perspective or orientation. It is
an alternative way of seeing the world, taking people as its
point of reference, rather than focusing exclusively on the
security of territory or governments. Like other security
concepts - national security, economic security, food
security - it is about protection. Human security entails
taking preventive measures to reduce vulnerability and
minimize risk, and taking remedial action where prevention
fails."12
Scope and Dimensions of Human SecurityAs a pioneering effort, the UNDP's Human Development
Report13 of 1994 has broadened the scope of human security
beyond the traditional norms of international security. The
Report has expanded the dimensions of human security into
seven areas of threats. Such include
Economic security requiring an assured basic income for
all human being, usually from productive and
12 Government of Canada, Human Security: Safety for people in a ChangingWorld, 1999, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.13 Adapted from the Report.
9
remunerative work or, as a last resort, from a
publicly financed safety net.
Food Security requiring that all people at all times
have both physical and economic access to basic
food. As a serious threat to human security, the
overall availability of food is not the problem,
rather the effective distributive mechanism and a
lack of purchasing power among most of the poorer
sections of world community.
Health security aiming to guarantee a minimum protection
from diseases and unhealthy lifestyles. In
developing countries, the major causes of untimely
death are infectious and parasitic diseases, and in
developed countries the major causes remains the
disease related to circulatory system. The threats
to health security are usually greater for poor
people in rural areas, particularly the women and
children, and the marginalized population at large
due to malnutrition, lack of safe motherhood
supports, insufficient supply of medicines, clean
water and the basic healthcare services.
Environmental security with the aim to protect people from
ravages of nature, human-induced threats to nature,
and the deterioration of the natural resources. In
developing countries, lack of access to clean water
resources is one of the greatest human security
10
threats whereas the air pollution and the global
warming caused by the greenhouse effects remain
serious environmental security threat in both the
worlds.
Personal security that aims to protect the people from
all forms of violence, abuse and exploitation,
discrimination as well as freedom from all threats
of crime, physical as well as psychological.
Community security having the intent to protect people
from the loss of indigenous relationships and values
as well as from sectarian and ethnic violence.
Protection of minority ethnic groups from the loss
of indigenous livelihood options, occupation and the
harmony with other communities needs to be taken
care as the core need of ensuring community
security.
Political security that is mainly concerned with protecting
the civil and political rights, securing from all
forms of political conflicts and empowering the
society to exercise the basic human rights.
Political repression, systematic tortures and
disappearances are still practices in many
countries.
From an ethical dimension, human security is to be
understood as an idea that promotes respect and protection
11
for individuals and that needs to be put into practice so
that individuals perceive it not as an elusive concept but
as a basic demand and a fundamental right, as well as a
personal responsibility and obligation. The normative dimension
of human security circumscribes the universal values and
principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and international humanitarian principles regarding
the protection of individuals.
Human Security Strategies: Protection and
EmpowermentThe Commission on Human Security14 has postulated the
concept of human security that stressed for the principle of
protecting the freedom of people. According to it, civilians
have a right to be protected from deliberate violence or the
deprivations of violence such as hunger, disease and
exhaustion. But it is the reflection that protection alone,
however, does not enable people to develop their own
strengths and formulate their own hopes. It is thus two
major strategies of human security need to be explained:
protection and empowerment. Protection is afforded by
strengthening and more effectively implementing the norms
and principles of international humanitarian law, by
building the capacity of institutions to address
14 Commission on Human Security, Human Security Now, New York, 2003. www. humansecurity-chs.org/finalreport/.
12
insecurities and by more generally helping the state live up
to its responsibility to protect its citizens. Empowerment
puts the needs of the individual or his/her community at
center stage and enables people to take ownership of the
larger decision-making processes determining their future.15
The strategic objective of human security, thus, should
be twofold: protection and empowerment of people and
communities that are fatally threatened by events beyond
control - political, social, environmental and biological.
Such include
To protect the vital core of all human lives from
critical pervasive threats;
To guarantee vital rights and freedoms to all
people to ensure human dignity and respect;
To create political, economic, social, cultural
and environmental conditions in which people live
knowing that their vital rights and freedoms are
secure;
To enable and empower human being to survive and
sustain with capacity to respond the critical and
pervasive threats;
To support for long-term human fulfillment by
facilitating participation, institutional
appropriateness and inclusion.
15 Handbook for transition Assistance, JICA, March 2006 , p. 55.
13
In this context, the Commission on Human Security16
strategizes various strategic options for protecting and
promoting human security. The Commission stresses on
protecting people in violent conflicts, protecting and
empowering migrant population as well as people in post-
conflict situations, reducing economic insecurity by
empowering poor to choose among opportunities, health
protection, and reinforcement of global human identity.
Principles and Approaches to Human SecurityProtection and Prevention
The International Commission on Intervention and State
Sovereignty produced a comprehensive report on "The
Responsibility to Protect" in 2001, which is a comprehensive report
detailing the need for exercising the "right of humanitarian
intervention". The outcomes of the report has considered a
triumph for the human security approach and made clear about
the following principles of human security:
The protection of individual welfare is more important than the
state. If the security of individuals is threatened
internally by the state or externally by other
states, state authority can be overridden.
Addressing the root causes of humanitarian crises
(e.g. economic, political or social instability)
16 Commission on Human Security, ibid.
14
is a more effective way to solve problems and
protect the long-term security of individuals.
Prevention is the best solution. A collective
understanding of the deeper social issues along
with a desire to work together is necessary to
prevent humanitarian crises, thereby preventing a
widespread absence of human security within a
population (which may mean investing more in
development projects).
Traditional Security and Human Security: What Difference?
Human security has added value in terms of reference,
scope of work, actors, means and the outcomes. Traditional
security is designed to promote demands ascribed to the
state in which other interests are subordinated to those of
the state. Traditional security protects a state's
boundaries, people, institutions and values. On the
contrary, human security is people-centered. A human
security approach attempted to transform traditional notions
of security, framed in terms of national and regional
stability and the stability of political and economic
systems, and to focus on human beings.17 The important
dimensions are to entail the well-being of individuals and
respond to ordinary people's needs in dealing with sources
of threats.
17 Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, Human Security: Concepts and Implications with anApplication to Post-Intervention Challenges in Afghanistan, Center for Peace andConflict Resolution, 2005, p. 4.
15
Traditional security seeks to defend states from
external aggression with the explanation that state security
is about a state's ability to deter or defeat an attack. It
makes uses of deterrence strategies to maintain the
integrity of the state and protect the territory from
external threats. Whereas in addition to protecting the
state from external aggression, human security intends to
expand the scope of protection to include a broader range of
threats, including environmental pollution, infectious
diseases, and economic deprivation.
The realization of human security involves not only
governments, but also a broader participation of different
actors including regional and international organizations,
non-governmental organizations and local communities. In
traditional security, the state assumes the sole
responsibility so as to ensure its own survival. Policy and
decision making power is centralized to the government
structures and the execution of strategies rarely involves
the public at large. It also assumes that a sovereign state
is operating in an anarchical international environment, in
which there is no world governing body to enforce
international rules of conduct.
16
As a matter of reality, traditional security relies
upon building up national power and military defense. The
common forms it takes are armament races, alliances,
strategic boundaries, and so on. Human security not only
protects, but also empowers people and societies as a means
of security. People contribute by identifying and
implementing solutions to insecurity.
In summary, we can say that human security differs from
state security in four key respects. It is people-centered
focusing on protecting people from a wide range of menaces,
rather than approaching protection not just in terms of
territorial boundaries for preventing external aggression
alone. It merely includes protection from menaces like
population movements, infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS and
long-term conditions of deprivation and oppression. The
range of actors in human security is also greater from
community to global, from government to civil society,
regional and international organizations, and also including
the non-state actors. It brings people together to identify
and implement solutions through empowerment.18
Human Security and Transition
18 Based on the analysis made by Commission on Human Security, Human Security Now: Protecting and Empowering People, New York, 2003.
17
In transitional societies, the concept of human
security has special significance. In a society where
fragile peace has just been achieved and state institutions
are still weak, the protection of citizens, which is
normally a responsibility of state, is not fully achieved,
leaving parts of the individual population in vulnerable
conditions. The basic human needs are often not met,
especially in the early phase of the transition, posing
continuous threats to the life and well-being of citizens.
The general lessons on human security19 in transition
situations include
Human security tries to avoid gaps in transition
assistance by enabling both the humanitarian and
development organizations in an integrated and
holistic manner.
A bottom-up or empowerment approach rather than
the top-down or protection approach should be the
crucial component of transitional assistance that
includes community development and empowerment
programmes and complement top-down state building
assistance in pursuit of improved human security.
Multi-sectoral linkages need to be made at
community level to address human security concerns
in an integrated way and all activities should be
coordinated with other development and
19 Adapted from "Handbook for Transition Assistance", JICA, March 2006.
18
humanitarian organizations using human security as
a core principle of intervention.
Assistance in the field of human security needs to
be used promoting peace, building capacities at
national, sub-national and community levels, and
contributing to the sustainability of the
developmental process.
Accountability needs to be ensured not only for
the process as well as the results relevant to
human security interventions.
Human Security and Development: An Interface
The growing understanding of human security dimensions
has drawn attention and challenged the practice and
behaviour of international, regional and national
development with some remarkable interfaces between
development and human security. If development can be seen
as a process of expanding the real freedoms that people
enjoy, there are three basic connections regarding
development-human security interface. One, human security
forms an important part of people's wellbeing and is
therefore an objective of development. Second, lack of human
security has adverse consequences on economic growth and
poverty and thereby on development. Third, lack of
development, or imbalanced development that involves sharp
horizontal inequalities, is an important cause of conflict.
19
As analyzed by Francis Stewart20 in 'Development and
Security', drawing the inference that security and development
are deeply interconnected, the following arguments worth to
be underscored:
Human security forms an important part of people’s well-being, and is
therefore an objective of development. An objective of
development is “the enlargement of human choices”.
Insecurity cuts life short and thwarts the use of
human potential, thereby affecting the reaching of
this objective.
Lack of human security has adverse consequences on economic growth,
and therefore development.Some development costs are
obvious. For example, in wars, people who join the
army or flee can no longer work productively. Also,
destroying infrastructure reduces the productive
capacity of the economy.
Imbalanced development that involves horizontal inequalities is an
important source of conflict. Therefore, vicious cycles of
lack of development which leads to conflict, then
to lack of development, can readily emerge.
Likewise, virtuous cycles are possible, with high
20 Frances Stewart, "Development and Security", Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security, and Ethnicity (CRISE), Working Paper 3, London: University of Oxford, 2004.
Challenging Issues of Human SecurityAs the inferences drawn by analyzing the situation in
the world, various aspects remain predominant in determining
the challenges to human security. Violation of human rights,
increased political and social conflicts leading to human
displacement, transnational organized crimes and terrorism,
trafficking in human beings, poverty and unemployment,
unsafe migration, natural disasters and environmental loss,
epidemics of HIV/AIDS and communicable diseases, drug
trafficking, and so on remain as the challenging issues with
respect to human security. In this respect, Anwaral Karim
Chowdhury 21 has identified the key challenging issues which
should receive a priority attention in ensuring human
security. According to him, human security is threatened by
(a) poverty and lack of development; (b) landmines, small
arms and light weapons; (c) drug trafficking and trafficking
of women and children; and (d) human rights violations.
Based on the analysis and review, the following issues and
concerns of human security worth to be discussed:
21 Mr. Chowdhury was Permanent Representative Representative of Bangladesh to the UN. He presented the issue paper at the Fourth UN Conference on Disarmament Issues on "Human Security: A Broader Dimension", Kyoto, Japan 1999.
21
Conflict, Displacement and Post-conflict Human Security
In 2002, of the 20 countries with the lowest scores on
the human development index, 16 were in conflict or just
emerging from it. Conflicts represent a threatening context
for those whose rights to protection and assistance have
been denied and ignored. Almost without exception the
world's worst human rights abused and humanitarian crises
take place during conflict. (World Disasters Report 2004)
The number of refugees, internally displaced peoples,
and asylum-seekers jumped from under 15 million in 1990 to
over 22 million in 2000, a fifty percent increase in just
one decade. Refugees are a symptom of a deeper malaise in
the polities from which they have fled. The failure to
establish satisfactory coping mechanisms is a symptom of a
deeper malaise afflicting the world. At the same time, the
institution of asylum is under grave threat. Many
politicians in receiving states see refugees and asylum
seekers in negative terms, as a threat to social cohesion,
employment, or even as posing a threat of insurgency and
terrorism. In both developing and developed countries,
governments have for some time been constructing legal and
physical barriers to the influx of asylum seekers or those
displaced by war. Individuals are effectively precluded from
precluded from asylum, through visa regulations, carrier
22
sanctions, shifting the burden of assessing and processing
claims to adjoining territories, physical closing of
borders, detention of asylum seekers, and withdrawal of
welfare support. These have all been employed to interdict
and deter asylum seekers.22
According to Human Security Report23, despite the
decline in the number of people killed in conflicts during
21st century in comparison to 20th century, many people in
large parts of the world live in intolerable situations of
insecurity, often as a result of conflict. High levels of
insecurity in most of the conflict-prone countries are
indicated by the levels of refugees and displaced persons
and the low ranking in human development indicators. A
noteworthy feature of contemporary conflicts is the very
high level of population displacement. Such conflicts are
also associated with high levels of human rights violations
and violation of humanitarian law, including forced
detention, atrocities such as amputation or decapitation,
widespread or systematic rape and other forms of sexual
abuse and violence, and the use of child soldiers. Most
seriousness is that displaced children are often trapped in22 'Globalization, Migration and Human Security' presented by Ramesh Thakur at the seminar on "Globalization, Migration, and Human Security: Challenges in Northeast Asia", United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, October 2003. 23 Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century, New York, Oxford University Press prepared by Human Security Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada. Available at: http://www. humansecurityreport.info/