HUL PPT

PROJECT ON

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF HUL

BY:PRITIKA JAGDALE :18KANCHAN PATEL : 34

AMOL PAWAR : 36

OBJECTIVE GROWTH AND MARKET SHARE

INDUSTRY DATA

MARKET SHARE OF HUL

Product of HUL

RATIOS

Profitability Ratio :

Return on Capital Ratio :

Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

Ratio 104.78 121.81 140.49 66.58

Return on Equity Ratio :

Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

Ratio 77.98 116.60 120.88 56.53

Turnover Ratio :

Debtor Turnover Ratio :

Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

Ratio 25.83 37.70 30.84 27.48

Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

Ratio 14.13 9.68 11.83 13.28

Debtor Collection Period Ratio :

Solvency Ratio :

Debt Equity Ratio :

Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

Ratio 0.00 0.20 0.06 0.03

Common Size Statement

Profit and loss A/C

In the current year the PAT of hul has been decreased to 0.38 %(2010-11.50% ,2009-11.88%) in the previous year ,there is need for improvement in profitability.

Further analysis indicates that there is profitability have been more because there have been decrease in operating expense i.e. 2010 – 85.46% as compared to previous years 09,07,06.

Balance sheet

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have decreased as2010 – 17.76% is compared with 2009 where as if we compared with 2007 &2006 then in 2010 there is increased in current asset .

Loan &advances have decreased (7.27%) which a good sign for as compared with 09,07,06.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased as compared with the 09,07,06. But there overall facts signals that there is satisfactory increase in the liquidity position of the firm.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

In 2009 – 2010

The PAT has been decreased by 16.18% .

Further analysis indicates there e will be profitability because there is decrease in operating expenses by 14.83%.

In 2007 – 2009

The PAT has been increased by 38.15%, this reflecting improvement in efficiency of manufacturing operation.

Further analysis indicates that profitability would have been more but for an increase in operating expenses by 49.05%.

Profit and loss A/C

In 2006 – 2007

The PAT has been increased by 13% , this reflecting improvement in efficiency of manufacturing operation.

Futher analysis indicates tht profitability would have been more but for an increase in operating expenses by 12.83%.

Balance sheet

In 2009 – 2010

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have decreased by 4.16%.Inventories have been decrease by 13.80%.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased by 16.41%,these fact signal overall increase in liquidity position of the firm .

In 2007 – 2009

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have increased by 70.90%.Inventories have been increased by 29.45%.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased by 13.16%, these fact signal overall increase in liquidity position of the firm .

In 2006 – 2007

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have increased by 3.40%.Inventories have been increased by 26.22%.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased by 13.00%,these fact signal overall increase in liquidity position of the firm .

PORTER'S FIVE FORCES MODEL

A proposal was made to increase the allocation of Bharat Nirman programme

Remuneration was increased under the NREGA scheme

MAT has been increased from 18% to 18.5% Overall the budget has been positive

for the HUL especially when the FMCG sector is kneeling under surging input costs and high inflation.

IMPACT OF BUDGET 2011

HUL derives more than 50% of its sales from rural markets

Better infrastructure facilities will improve their supply chain

HUL have immense possibilities for growth Increased focus on farm sector will boost rural

incomes

CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION