http://www.ode.state.or.us/ search/page/?id=3637 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Educator Effectiveness Toolkit
Http:// Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Educator Effectiveness Toolkit.
Jan 29, 2016
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3637
Oregon Framework for Teacher and
Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems
Educator Effectiveness Toolkit
Multiple Measures: The What, Why and HowPresenterBev Pratt, Chalkboard Project
Required Elements of Teacher and Administrator
EvaluationStandards of Professional Practice
Differentiated Performance Levels
Multiple Measures
Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle
Aligned Professional Learning
Categories of Evidence for Multiple MeasuresProfessional Practice
Professional Responsibilities
Student Learning and Growth
MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER & PRINCIPAL
EFFECTIVENESS
Professional Responsibilities
Student Learning and Growth
All measures are supported through artifacts and evidence.
Student & Professional Growth Process
SMART Goal Process
Student Growth & Professional Goal Setting
Template
EXAMPLE
Student and Professional Growth Goal Template
Goal Setting Process
Goal Setting Components Categories of Evidence for Multiple Measures
Content Professional Practice
Context Professional Practice
Baseline Data Professional Practice, Student Learning and Growth
Strategies for Improvement Professional Practice, Professional Responsibilities
Resources and Support Professional Practice, Professional Responsibilities
Student Growth Goal Statement
Student Learning and Growth
Professional Growth Goal Professional Practice, Professional Responsibilities
Alignment of Student Growth Process and Template
Goal Setting Components
Student Growth Process
Baseline Data Step 1
Student Growth Goal Statement
Step 2
Strategies for Improvement
Steps 3 & 4
Strategies for Modification
Step 4
Reflection on Results Step 5
Alignment of Goal Template and Danielson Domains
Goal Setting Components
Danielson Domain
Content Domain 1
Context Domain 1
Baseline Data Domains 1, 3
Student Growth Goal Statement
Domains 1, 3, 4
Professional Growth Goal
Domains 1, 2, 3, & 4
Strategies for Improvement
Domains 1, 2, 3, & 4
Resources and Support Domains 1, 2, 3, & 4
Student and Professional Growth Goal Template
Student Growth Goal Setting Template (cont.)
Evaluation and Support System
Student & Professional Growth Plan
Evaluation Conferences
Ongoing reflection and planning
Evaluation Criteria
Support System
Final Effectiveness Rating Matrix
Weighted Model
Category Weighting
Score
Professional Practice
60% 3 .6 x 3 = 1.8
Professional Responsibilities
20% 4 .2 x 4 = .8
Student Learning and Growth
20% 3 .2 x 3 = .6
Total Score 3.0
Weighted Model
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICEPROFESSIONAL
RESPONSIBILITIES
Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Prof Goal
Comp. Score Comp. Score Comp. Score Comp. Score Score
A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 3
B 3 B 3 B 3 B 3
C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3
D 4 D 3 D 3 D 3
E 3 E 3 E 3 E 3
F 3 F 3
Total D:1 19 Total D:2 18 Total D:3 15 Total D:4 15
Weighted Model Cont.
STUDENT LEARNING & GROWTH
SLO 1 SLO 2
Component Score Component Score
A 3 A 3
B 3 B 3
C 3 C 3
Total 9 Total 9
Summative ScoreArea Score Eval Points
Professional Practice 68 Pts Possible Area Percentage Points as 58.6% of Eval
Total 52 76.47% 44.81
Professional Responsibilities 24 Pts Possible Area Percentage Points as 20.7% of Eval
Total 18 75.00% 15.53
Student Learning & Growth 24 Pts Possible Area Percentage Points as 20.7% of Eval
Total 18 75.00% 15.53
Score 0.75862069 75.86
** All scores assigned on a 1-4 scale
Key
Unsatisfactory <50Basic 50-74Proficient 75-89Distinguished 90-100
A teacher e
arning
a Level 3 on th
e
rubric and good
progress to
ward
goals will b
e on a
self-
directe
d 2
year plan
A teacher e
arning
a Level 3 on th
e
rubric and good
progress to
ward
goals will b
e on a
self-
directe
d 2
year plan
A teacher e
arning a
Level 1 on th
e
rubric and lim
ited
progress toward
goals will b
e on a
plan of
awareness
A teacher e
arning a
Level 1 on th
e
rubric and lim
ited
progress toward
goals will b
e on a
plan of
awareness
Technical AssistanceDistrict models for teacher and administrator evaluation systems will be posted in the Educator Effectiveness Toolkit by January 31, 2013.
The Educator Effectiveness Toolkit (including evaluation rubrics, models, tools, process guides) is available at: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3759
Rubrics for teacher and administrator evaluations are available at: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3784
Template for the July 1, 2013 assurances submission available at: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3842
Webinar Series beginning in January 2013; http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3834
Regional support during March and April 2013
Related Documents
