Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco Ras Tanura Integrated Project Information Management Lessons Learned Bob Donaho March 2010
Feb 20, 2016
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
Ras Tanura Integrated Project Information Management Lessons Learned
Bob Donaho March 2010
Author <date> Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco Pg. 2
What is the Ras Tanura Integrated Project • Program to Design, Construct and Startup a Very Large
(GIGA) Grassroots Petrochemical Facility • Joint Initiative of Dow Chemical and Saudi Aramco • Located on East Coast of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia • Highly Integrated Facility • > 25 Process Plants – Each a Major Project • Current In the FEED Stage. • Multiple Project Management and FEED Contractors
Located on Two Continents
Author <date> Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco Pg. 3
Information Management on RTIP
• A Critical Capability for Delivering the Assets • Managed Strategically within the Program • Developed Considering Critical Capabilities
Needed for the Program while Addressing Constraints from the Marketplace.
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
Topics:
• What has been decided • What has not been decided • What has been learned • What is needed
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
What has been decided (Engineering Tools):
SmartPlant P&ID • Non-Hosted • Blend of Owner and CPMC
existing standards • Over 130 updates released
SmartPlant Instrumentation • Non-Hosted • CPMC existing standard • Only 1 update released
Other Industry Staples • Primavera • Kbase • ETAP (Electrical Design) • Microstation
3D Modeling • Contractor choice of PDS,
PDMS, SP3D for modeling • Various for Review
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
Skire’s Unifier Cost & Project Mgmt
Spares Managemen
t Legal
Library
File sharing & co-editing
Web pages, branding, news, communications
LiveCycle Electronic Reviews
RTIPSupplier Contracts Mgmt
MS Access DB Supply Planning
HP’s Quality Center Requirements Mgmt (MOM)
Proc Integration DB Process Integration
What has been decided (Giga-Project Enabling Tools):
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
What has not been decided:
• 3D Review • Format must accept data from all 3D systems used during EPC
phase • Format must be consistent with best-in-class review animation
capability • To be used for training, reviews, and visual navigation of
documents and drawings • Spares Optimization system
• Significant data modeling effort • Significant data coordination effort across EPC Contractors
• JV Document Management system • Impacts meta-data handover instructions
• JV Manufacturing, Operations and Maintenance systems • Impacts handover instructions for equipment and material data
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
What has been Learned:
The Vision: We will use value-based assessment to select “best of breed” Owner or CPMC solutions (tools, processes, standards).
The Reality: There was no “one best” solution. Instead new standards were built starting in pre-Feed, incorporating elements of the Owner and CPMC solutions.
The Vision: Organizations that are expert at supporting existing internal solutions can develop a new solution incorporating input from both Owners and CPMC quickly
The Reality: New or modified solutions take time to develop, and raise risk through unintended consequences and through increased demand for changes to “tune” untested standards.
The Vision: We will specify given systems to our Contractors, and we will get back coherent consistent data.
The Reality: Given the number of Contractors and diverse tool capabilities, it is unlikely that specifying Owner standards for systems is sustainable within cost and schedule.
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
The Vision: We will specify ISO 15926 output format, which can then be “inhaled” by the as-yet unspecified Owner JV systems.
The Reality: We have not yet located a usable “Data Delivery Requirements” document which we can leverage into our specifications, which is a) understandable by all Owners, and b) biddable by all EPC’s.
The Vision: Engineering systems with rich and robust functionality sets are the tools-of-choice in the industry.
The Reality: The industry standard is Excel. Engineers think in lists, the simpler the better. Contractors can commit to placing data in Excel but freeze up when discussing databases (too many unknowns, too much impact on internal work processes, etc.).
What has been Learned (continued):
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
What we (maybe the Industry) need:
• “Portal” which is the entry point for all info regarding ISO 15926. • Biddable delivery requirements document specifying ISO 15926
or derivative. • Non-Invasive data comparison and validation tools/service to
ensure compliance with owners data delivery requirements. • Common 3D Review platform.
Contains Confidential Information of Both Dow and Saudi Aramco
Questions