Top Banner
HS 220 SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE HS 220
42
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Hs 220

HS 220SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE

HS 220

Page 2: Hs 220

SCIENCE AND ETHICS

HS 220

Page 3: Hs 220

First of all it is necessary to examine the meaning of the words Science and Ethics, independently and then in the context of socitey

HS 220

Page 4: Hs 220

SCIENCE:

Science is a process, a system, a way to acquire knowledge about the physical world around us.Science, in its pure form, doesn’t have sides, good or bad, positive or negative.Science, one could propose, is the force of understanding

HS 220

Page 5: Hs 220

ETHICS:It is the attempt to arrive at general moral standards that tell us (people) how to judge right from wrong, or good from bad, and how to live moral lives

It is a set of criteria, created by man, to define a guideline to his existence. A guideline between what should and what should not occur.

HS 220

Page 6: Hs 220

The above interpretations are, at first glance, not connected to each other.

HS 220

Page 7: Hs 220

Why should we need Ethics in Science?

HS 220

Page 8: Hs 220

Science can furnish a strong factual account of the world but it lacks the internal resources to deal with the many normative questions it raises.

On its own, science cannot answer questions about right and wrong about how we ought to make decisions and act.

HS 220

Page 9: Hs 220

Hence it must appeal to ethics to help formulate adequate responses.

HS 220

Page 10: Hs 220

Is Science Objective and Value Free?

HS 220

Page 11: Hs 220

The common characterization of science as value-free or value-neutral can be misleading.

Scientists strongly disvalue fraud, error and "pseudoscience", for example.

At the same time, scientists typically value reliability, testability, accuracy, precision, generality, simplicity of concepts and heuristic power

HS 220

Page 12: Hs 220

Ethos of Science by Robert Merton:

HS 220

Universalism:Race, nationality, religion, class, or other personal or social attributes of the researcher should not matter to the validity of conclusion.

Communism:Open communication and common ownership of knowledge.

Dis intrestedness:Beliefs not biased by authority--achieved through accountability to expert peers

Organized Skepticism: It means that scientific claims must be exposed to critical scrutiny before being accepted.

Page 13: Hs 220

Clash between Merton ethos and ethical values:

Weapons research, even if conducted according to Merton's norms and its results evaluated using scientific standards, is not ethically idle or value-neutral.

HS 220

Research into better agricultural methods aimed to alleviate hunger or low-cost forms of harnessing solar or wind energy in poor rural areas is also not ethical.

Page 14: Hs 220

Ethics in Research

There are several reasons why it is important to adhere to ethical norms in research.

Norms promote the aims of research, such as knowledge, truth, and avoidance of error.

HS 220

For example, prohibitions against fabricating, falsifying, or misrepresenting research data promote the truth and avoid error.

Page 15: Hs 220

Ethical standards promote the values that are essential to collaborative work, such as trust, accountability, mutual respect, and fairness.

HS 220

Ethics in Research

For example, many ethical norms in research, such as guidelines for authorship, copyright and patenting policies, data sharing policies, and confidentiality rules in peer review, are designed to protect intellectual property interests while encouraging collaboration. Most researchers want to receive credit for their contributions and do not want to have their ideas stolen or disclosed prematurely.

Page 16: Hs 220

Many of the ethical norms help to ensure that researchers can be held accountable to the public.

HS 220

Ethics in Research

For Instance, federal policies on research misconduct, conflicts of interest, the human subjects protections, and animal care and use are necessary in order to make sure that researchers who are funded by public money can be held accountable to the public

Page 17: Hs 220

Ethical norms in research also help to build public support for research.

Ethics in Research

HS 220

For example, People more likely to fund research project if they can trust the quality and integrity of research.

Page 18: Hs 220

Many of the norms of research promote a variety of other important moral and social values, such as social responsibility, human rights, animal welfare, compliance with the law, and health and safety. Ethical lapses in research can significantly harm human and animal subjects, students, and the public.

HS 220

Ethics in Research

For example, a researcher who fabricates data in a clinical trial may harm or even kill patients, and a researcher who fails to abide by regulations and guidelines relating to radiation or biological safety may jeopardize his health and safety or the health and safety of staff and students

Page 19: Hs 220

Codes and Policies for Research Ethics

• Openness: Share data, results, ideas, tools, resources. Be open to criticism and new ideas.

HS 220

• Honesty: Strive for honesty in all scientific communications. Honestly report data, results, methods and procedures, and publication status

• Objectivity: Strive to avoid bias in experimental design, data analysis, data interpretation, peer review, personnel decisions, grant writing, expert testimony, and other aspects of research where objectivity is expected or required

• Integrity: Keep your promises and agreements; act with sincerity; strive for consistency of thought and action.

• Carefullness: Avoid careless errors and negligence; carefully and critically examine your own work and the work of your peers

Page 20: Hs 220

• Respect for colleagues: Respect your colleagues and treat them fairly.

HS 220

• Respect for Intellectual property: Honor patents, copyrights, and other forms of intellectual property. Do not use unpublished data, methods, or results without permission. Never plagiarize

• Confidentiality: Protect confidential communications, such as papers or grants submitted for publication, personnel records, trade or military secrets, and patient records.

• Responsible Publication: Publish in order to advance research and scholarship, not to advance just your own career. Avoid wasteful and duplicative publication.

• Responsible Mentoring: Help to educate, mentor, and advise students. Promote their welfare and allow them to make their own decisions

Page 21: Hs 220

• Animal Care: Show proper respect and care for animals when using them in research. Do not conduct unnecessary or poorly designed animal experiments.

HS 220

• Social Responsibility: Strive to promote social good and prevent or mitigate social harms through research, public education, and advocacy.

• Non-Discrimination: Avoid discrimination against colleagues or students on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, or other factors that are not related to their scientific competence and integrity.

• Competence: Maintain and improve your own professional competence and expertise through lifelong education and learning; take steps to promote competence in science as a whole.

• Legality: Know and obey relevant laws and institutional and governmental policies.

Page 22: Hs 220

• Human Subjects Protection: When conducting research on human subjects, minimize harms and risks and maximize benefits; respect human dignity, privacy, and autonomy; take special precautions with vulnerable populations; and strive to distribute the benefits and burdens of research fairly.

HS 220

Page 23: Hs 220

Are there any people who can offer ethical advice?

It may be useful to seek advice from a colleague, a senior researcher, your department chair, or anyone else you can trust(?)

HS 220

Page 24: Hs 220

Example for Research Plagiarism

In 1953 when James Watson and Francis Crick were credited for discovering the structure of the DNA, when in fact the credit should have gone to a brilliant female biologist Rosalind Franklin.

Franklin came up with the double helix structure based on X-ray images of the DNA. Her supervisor passed her data to Watson and Crick who at the time were also studying the DNA and realized Franklin was on the right track. In 1962 Watson and Crick received the Nobel Prize for 'their' discovery. Franklin on the other hand was already dead. She died at the age of 38 due to radiation exposure she got from taking X-rays as part of her original research.

HS 220

Page 25: Hs 220

Right & Wrong of New Knowledge

Sometimes new knowledge can be misused. In 1905 as part of his research for Special Theory of Relativity Einstein realized that huge amounts of energy could be released from a small amount of matter. This idea is expressed in his famous equation (energy = mass times the speed of light squared). If one could split the nucleus of the atom a huge explosion would follow. A bomb based on this principle would be a devastating weapon which killed around 2,00,000 people during 2nd world war.

HS 220

Page 26: Hs 220

The USA alone is estimated to have spent over $ 10 trillion on nuclear arms during the Cold War (1945 - 1990).

HS 220

What could have been achieved if this money would have been spent on infrastructure, health care, education and medical research?

Page 27: Hs 220

Right & Wrong in Science Today

Genetic research is a modern area of study that raises many ethical questions.

HS 220

For example, for gene therapies it is sometime necessary to harvest stem cells from human embryos.

Page 28: Hs 220

However due to advancement in scientific knowledge only let the people to raise the question about embryo which was once considered as non living

So pursuit of new knowledge and technologies force us to face new ethical questions

Is it right to harvest these cells, even if it is done to cure someone?

The embryo could develop into a healthy baby.

Right & Wrong in Science Today

HS 220

Page 29: Hs 220

To study human genes researchers have fertilized eggs that contain both human and animal DNA.

Right & Wrong in Science Today

HS 220

Is producing hybrid fetuses morally right?

Are we playing god when we conduct such experiments?

Some hybrid animals that have been created by researches are quite bizarre like a mouse with a human ear.

Some genetically manipulated animals are used to produce medicine, for example genetically manipulated cows that produce insulin for diabetics.

Page 30: Hs 220

Thus we can conclude from above

“Morality to exist at all, there must be somethings that,regardless of consequences, should not be done”

Right & Wrong in Science Today

HS 220

Page 31: Hs 220

However the advancement of genetic research holds much promise.

In 2003 researchers managed to map out entire human DNA. We now are at verge of understanding the genetic basis for many diseases, and with genetic manipulation possibly curing them.

Thus, through rational and balanced arguments we may be able to come to wise judgments regarding the use of new knowledge and technologies even when it is impossible to predict all the consequences these may bring about.

HS 220

For example couples could be screened so they know what risk they have to give births to a baby with a hereditary disease. If the risk is great they could opt to have a test tube baby that has been screened not to carry faulty genes, or through genetic manipulation the faulty gene could be replaced by a healthy one before planting the egg in the womb

Page 32: Hs 220

HS 220

Scientists about Ethics

“Change is one thing, progress is another. Change is scientific, progress is ethical. Change is indubitable where as progress is a matter of controversy”

But scientists proclaim that “Scientific Progress requires a critical mind, free of prejudice and open to new way of thinking”

-Bertrand Arthur William Russel

Page 33: Hs 220

“Relativity applies to Physics, not Ethics”

But finally Einstein regretted that was the great mistake in his life. HS 220

-Einstein

Page 34: Hs 220

Universal Code of Ethics for Scientists

“I will not, knowingly, carry out research which is to the detriment of humanity. If, in the event, research to which I have contributed is used, in my view, to the detriment of the human race then I shall work actively to combat its development”.

HS 220

-Proposed by Sir Arnold Wolfendale

Page 35: Hs 220

Universal Code of Ethics for ScientistsWorld conference on scienceScience Agenda—Framework for Action, Ethical issues

HS 220

Ethics should be part of the education and training of all scientists.

Research institutions should foster the study of ethical aspects of scientific work.

The international scientific community should promote environmental ethics.

Scientific institutions should comply with ethical norms.

Governments and civil society should organize debates on the ethical implications of the scientific work

Governments and civil society should set up ethics committees.

UNESCO should strengthen its Bioethics Committee and the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology.

Page 36: Hs 220

“Solutions to ethical problems that come from scientific progress cannot be imposed by dogma of faith, or by law. It is the civil society that must find an acceptable solution”

Universal Code of Ethics for Scientists

HS 220

Page 37: Hs 220

Bibliography

• B. Glass, "The Ethical Basis of Science" Science, Vol. 150. 1965, p. 1254. [Q1 S35]

• C.E. Reagan, Ethics for Scientific Researchers, 2nd Ed. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1971. [BJ57 R4 1971]

• J.A. Knight, "Exploring the Compromise of Ethical Principles in Science" Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. Vol. 27, 1984, p. 432. [QH301 P4]

Science and Ethics

HS 220

Page 38: Hs 220

BibliographyNorms of Science

• C. J. Sindermann, "Winning the Games Scientists Play" (Plenum: New York, 1982).

• H. Zuckerman. "Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science" in Deviance and Social Change (Ed Sagarin, Ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, p. 87. [HM291 D483]

• W. Schmaus. "Fraud and the Norms of Science" Science, Technology, & Human Values. Fall 1983. Vol. 8, #4, p. 12. [BJ57 N49]

HS 220

Page 39: Hs 220

Bibliography

• M. Hunt. "A fraud that shook the world of science" New York Times Magazine. November 1, 1981, p. 1. [AP2 N675]

• A.S. Brown and D.R. Murphy. "Cryptomnesia: Delineating indadvertent plagiarism" Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 15, 1989, p. 432. [BF1 J615]

• D.S. Greenberg. "Academic fraud is no longer a family affair" Los

Angeles Times, December 6, 1988, p. 7. [AN L6]

Plagiarism

HS 220

Page 40: Hs 220

BibliographyScientific Credit

• P. Zurer, "Making federal cases out of disputes over scientific credit" Chemical & Engineering News Feb. 24, 1997, p. 40. [TP1 C35]

• R. L. Rawls, "Obesity gene battle shapes up: New uncoupling protein looks to be promising for antiobesity drugs, but who found its gene first? Chemical Engineering News May 24, 1997, p. 44. [TP1 C35]

HS 220

Page 41: Hs 220

Bibliography

Last but not least Sambit Mallick’s Lecture Notes Ethos of Science

HS 220

Page 42: Hs 220

THANK YOU

HS 220