1 2017-18 To find out all about the programme, click on the links below How To Use This Handbook Introducing the Department How we assess you Academic Calendar 2013-2014 Assessment Welcome & Equality of Opportunity A Guide to Undergraduate Modular Scheme Assessment The Department of Performing Arts Staff Profiles and Contacts Assessment Criteria Grading Criteria Your Course Course Summary Rules and Regulations Introduction Attendance Course Content Statements and Regulations The Course What You Will Learn The Quality of Your Course Assuring the Quality of This Course Your Modules Being a Student Rep How to Read a Module Outline Skills Workshop 1 Support Systems
143
Embed
How To Use This Handbook - University Centre Weston...cover (please do) or you can dip in and out as and when you need to. The contents page, allows you to move freely about the book,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
2017-18
To find out all about the programme, click on the links below
How To Use This Handbook
Introducing the Department How we assess you
Academic Calendar 2013-2014 Assessment
Welcome & Equality of Opportunity A Guide to Undergraduate Modular
Scheme Assessment The Department of Performing Arts
Year 1 (or Level 4) of your study on the FdA Musical Theatre introduces you to the
basic building blocks of the subject. There are four modules in the year, which you
can read by clicking below.
LEVEL 4 MODULES
DR4501 Skills workshop 1
DR4502 Performance Workshop
DR4503 Musical Theatre in Context 1
DR4504 Professional Studies 1
Page 26 of 143
Year 2 (or Level 5) studies continues to train your core technique. There are four
modules in the year, which you can read by clicking below.
LEVEL 5 MODULES
DR5501 Skills Workshop 2
DR5502 Performance Project
DR5503 Musical Theatre in Context 2
DR5504 Professional Studies 2
❖Go to Contents
Page 27 of 143
In designing the course, the Department has considered the QAA Subject
Benchmark Statement for Dance, Drama and Performance (2015) to align the
course with all other degrees in the subject area.
The aims of any HE course explain what the University, staff and course aim to do to
enable your learning. This course aims to:
• Develop the necessary skills set required for the role and practice of the Musical Theatre performer with respect to singing, acting and dance.
• Propagate understanding and knowledge of current job requirements and work opportunities within the Musical Theatre industry
• To enable individuals to contribute to the creation and/or production of performance through an understanding of appropriate performance vocabularies, techniques, structures and working methods.
• Foster an understanding of appropriate independent research, whether investigating past or present musical theatre performances or as part of the process of creating new performance
On completion of this course, you will be able to demonstrate the acquisition of a
range of knowledge and skills (be they practical or cognitive). These are the
‘learning outcomes’ of the course, and you will pass the course if you are able to
show you have attained all these outcomes at threshold level – i.e. you can just do
them. If you can surpass the threshold level, you will receive higher grades for your
work. The learning outcomes for your course are as follows, some outcomes are
about your knowledge, some of them are about your skills and abilities and some of
them are about skills that you can use in all walks of life (transferable skills).
KNOWLEDGE
On completion of the course, students will:
1. The forms and practices of Musical Theatre performance in a historical context
2. The role and practice of the Musical Theatre performer with respect to singing, acting and dance.
3. Key Theatre and Musical Theatre practitioners, theorists and practices within their cultural and historical contexts.
4. The key components of Musical Theatre and the process by which Musical Theatre is created and realised through the application of knowledge, practices, concepts and skills from different disciplines.
5. The interplay between practice and theory within the field of study. 6. Current job requirements and work opportunities within the Musical Theatre
industry
THINKING SKILLS
On completion of the course, students will:
1. Reason critically 2. Apply analytical, critical and historical concepts 3. Identify and solve problems 4. Demonstrate and exercise independence of mind and thought
SUBJECT-BASED PRACTICAL SKILLS
On completion of the course, students will:
1. Describe, interpret and critically evaluate performance texts (libretto, music score and choreography), production techniques and performance events.
2. Understand and apply the skills and processes of production, design and rehearsal by which performance is created.
3. Contribute to the creation and/or production of performance through an understanding of appropriate performance vocabularies, techniques, structures and working methods.
4. Engage in appropriate independent research, whether investigating past or present musical theatre performances or as part of the process of creating new performance.
5. Identify the cultural frameworks that surround performance events.
Page 29 of 143
6. Articulate a contextual understanding of Musical Theatre as a craft and as an art form through oral and written communication
SKILLS FOR LIFE AND WORK (GENERAL SKILLS)
On completion of the course, students will:
1. Develop ideas, construct arguments and present them in appropriate ways; 2. Work creatively and productively as part of a team in the realization of
practice based work; 3. Manage personal workloads and meet deadlines; 4. Gather, sift, synthesise and organise material independently; 5. Use information technology in appropriate ways and have an awareness of its
application and potential.
❖Go to Contents
Page 30 of 143
The course encourages your learning through participation in a wide variety of
activities including lectures, seminars, workshops, tutorials (face-to-face and online),
rehearsals, blogs and journals, group discussion, collaborative learning and peer
assessment. This section details the nature of the teaching and the kind of study
upon which your learning will centre. By its nature this will be forever changing, so
the following is an outline sketch only.
Your course is vocational, so your practical work will be hour intensive. However,
you will need to prepare for these classes so you will also need to do many hours of
private study (research, text analysis, practice, preparation for rehearsal etc.) in-
between sessions. You do much of your learning in class, supported by
considerable research, reflection and evaluation away from class. The course
requires considerable stamina and continued application. It is not easy.
The Foundation Degree in Musical Theatre is taught through workshops, lectures,
seminars and rehearsals, through different forms of performance (including in-class,
studio and stage work) and through industry workshops and a professional work
placement (For more detailed information on teaching methodology, please refer to
module descriptors at the back of this handbook).
The following explains some of the key approaches to teaching on the course. Some
classes may feature elements from several of the descriptions below.
A lecturer presents large quantities of information to a large group. You should take
your own notes: even if the lecturer provides notes, you should make your own to
guide your reflection afterwards. Lecturers will often provide you with sources for the
information they have used, but these are not an alternative for attending the
lectures.
Page 31 of 143
Here you practically explore a specific area of study with the intent of developing
your skills or approach to the work. Workshops move freely between tutor-led
instruction, class discussion and practical exercises.
Page 32 of 143
A mixture of staff and student-led discussions usually held in smaller groups of 15-25
students. You prepare for these sessions and sometimes contribute personally to the
selected theme. Importantly, these open discussions generate ideas for you to
explore and imbed elsewhere in your work.
These classes embed consistent physical behaviour, by using repetition of physical
action; they are of particular use in the training of voice and movement. Current
research suggests that for any physical process to become a part of our habitual
behaviour we must repeat it around 10,000 times. Technical classes are a part of
that process of re-training your habitual behaviour.
These are opportunities to discuss your personal progress, usually in one-to-one or
small group sessions of 10-30 minutes duration. Tutorials are very time consuming
for staff and are not optional: failing to attend a tutorial counts as an absence.
Page 33 of 143
Here you will work on a project led by a member of staff, a student-director or an
external professional. You draw on the knowledge and skills you acquire in other
areas and bring them to bear on a text or stimulus. You approach rehearsals in a
professional manner.
Page 34 of 143
It is important that all your written work conforms to the approved academic formats.
Staging, choreographing, designing, rehearsing, managing and performing are all
fundamental activities, but thinking about your subject needs language to
communicate an intelligent personal response and, of course, writing is central to
clear and objective criticism and discussion. This section is not a guide to
researching, planning or writing essays; rather, it gives the correct academic format
for all essay and dissertation work. You must adhere to the presentational academic
conventions.
Think of your essays as potential articles for publication in the many scholarly
journals we subscribe to in the library. Don’t write in the style of popular journalism
or in a familiar, chatty way: you are writing for an academic readership. Always read
and research widely around your topic and support arguments with quotations from
journals, books and internet sources.
Written work must follow the following conventions and house-style:
• All written work must be word-processed with font size 12 OR Arial 12
• Use A4 paper
• Print on one side of the paper only
• Use double spaced lines
• Give wide, clear margins
• All pages must be numbered
• The essay title must be written in full at the top of page 1
• All essays must contain a bibliography
• The bibliography and references must use the following approved format
❖Go to Contents
Page 35 of 143
You must give the sources of all significant ideas and opinions you take from other
writers, either by direct quotation or in paraphrase. In your reading you will find it
helpful to be able to follow up the leads authors provide through their references to
other writers. If you do not acknowledge a source it might be assumed that
you were trying to pass off those words or ideas as your own. Even if that were
not your intention, if discovered it would damage the credibility of the rest of
your work. Deliberate plagiarism is regarded as a very serious offence in this
University and in academic writing generally. References to other writers should be
acknowledged in brackets and in your bibliography. You should reference after the
author’s name, whether you are paraphrasing ideas or quoting directly, and give the
page number. You do not need to acknowledge your sources for widely held views
or for well-known historical facts; but if you take unusual or significant ideas
from another writer, even though you put them into your own words, you must
acknowledge your source.
Please refer to cite them right accessible via the following link:
•Houseman, B. (2002). Finding Your Voice: A Complete Voice Training Manual for
Actors. London: Nick Hern Books
Page 48 of 143
•Kayes. G. (2004). Singing and The Actor (Ed 2). A&C Black Publishers Ltd. London.
•Orti, P. (2014) Your Handy Companion to Devising and Physical Theatre. 2nd Edition.
Singapore: Paper Play
•Peckham, A. (2000). The Contemporary Singer: Elements of Vocal Technique with
CD (Audio). Boston: Berklee Press Publications
•Stanislavski, C. (1980). An Actor Prepares. London: Methuen Drama.
•Vaganova. A. (1969). Basic Principals of Classical Ballet. Dover Publications.
Specialist resources:
Bespoke studio spaces
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces, audio/visual
equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in word-processed
form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts Computer Suite, along
with access to physical and online learning resources and remote internet access to
the Library’s electronic collection.
24 Preparatory work
Development of physical fitness, flexibility and vocal health will benefit progress on this
module. Taking fitness classes, using gym equipment in order to improve cardio
vascular fitness will help to strengthen the muscles and respiratory tract regardless of
prior experience.
Page 49 of 143
Code DR4502-40
Title PERFORMANCE WORKSHOP
Programme Drama
Level 4
Credits 40
ECTS 20
Contact time 150 Hours (including visiting practitioner workshops)
Acceptable for FdA Musical Theatre students only
Excluded combinations All other students
Core/Optional Core
Module Co-ordinator Abigail Green
Description
In this module, you will have the chance to explore different approaches to rehearsal and theatre-making in the context of musical theatre repertoire from 1900-present. The focus will be on developing your skills as a reflective practitioner and theatre-maker.
Outline Syllabus & Teaching & Learning Methods
Throughout the module, you will explore different practical and theoretical approaches to Musical Theatre repertoire. The module will be taught through weekly workshops, including visiting companies and practitioners, and there will be strong emphasis on active student participation through class work, group work and directed study assignments. You will have the opportunity to build your PDP skills through undertaking research assignments and reflecting on your work through discussions and written assignments.
Learning Resources
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces, audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection. Masterclasses: A number of established practitioners and industry professionals offer workshops and seminars on a range of skills and practices.
Intended Learning Outcomes How assessed
1. Ability to work creatively and constructively as part of a team in a workshop environment.
2. Critical and reflective engagement with practical work in the context of musical theatre repertoire.
3. Understanding and application of appropriate performance vocabularies, techniques and subject knowledge in the context of works studied.
Portfolio Portfolio; Performance Performance
Assessment Scheme
FORMATIVE
• In-class presentations and discussions
• Key filmed rehearsals of performed repertoire
Page 50 of 143
SUMMATIVE Weighting %
• Portfolio: - Individual Contribution - Written assignment - Performance
100%
Reading Lists/Key Texts & Websites
• Alfreds, M. (2007). Different Every Night: Rehearsal and Performance Techniques for Actors and Directors: Freeing the Actor. London: Nick Hern Books.
• Novak, A and Novak, E. (1997). Staging Musical Theatre: A Complete Guide for Directors, Choreographers and Producers. Romford: Players Press (U.K.).
• Berry, C. (2001). Text in Action: A Definitive Guide to Exploring Text in Rehearsal for Actors and Directors. London. Virgin Books
• Lamb, A. (2001). 150 Years of Popular Musical Theatre. New Haven. Yale University Press
In this module, you will explore the historical development of musical theatre as a performance genre from 1900 – present. Indicative areas of study might include the historical and socio-political contexts for well-known shows like Oklahoma!, West Side Story and Rent, the development of different musical theatre forms and styles (e.g. musical comedy, musical plays, concept musicals, pop and rock musicals) and the contributions of practitioners like Cole Porter, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Stephen Sondheim, Harold Prince, Kander and Ebb, Michael Bennett, Bob Fosse, Andrew Lloyd-Webber and Jason Robert Brown.
Outline Syllabus & Teaching & Learning Methods
This module will be taught through a mixture of tutor-led lectures and discussion seminars and student presentations. You will be expected to participate actively in all sessions and to complete Directed Study assignments outside class, such as research into the socio-cultural contexts of the works studied, and to share your discoveries through in-class discussions, oral presentations and written work. This module will also develop your core academic skills in areas such as research methodologies, planning and writing argumentative essays, and correct use of sources.
Learning Resources
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces, audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection. Masterclasses: A number of established practitioners and industry professionals offer workshops and seminars on a range of skills and practices.
Intended Learning Outcomes How assessed
1. Demonstrated understanding and ability to engage with seminar discussions with respect to key musical theatre works, movements and practitioners from the 1900 to the present in their cultural, historical and artistic contexts.
2. Demonstrated ability to conduct specific contextual research into the topics studied using academic
Portfolio Portfolio
Page 52 of 143
sources and to communicate findings clearly using ICT.
3. Demonstrated ability to conduct independent research in the topic areas covered, to engage with academic and professional sources, and to sift, synthesise and organise material into a formal written essay.
Written Assignment
Assessment Scheme
FORMATIVE
• Written research assignment, (e.g. annotated bibliography, essay plan)
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces,
audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in
word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts
Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources
and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection.
24 Preparatory work
Research into professional interview and audition processes
Page 57 of 143
Module Descriptor: Skills Workshop 2
1 Module code DR5501-40
2 Module title Skills Workshop 2
3 Subject field Writing and Performance
4 Pathway(s) FdA, Cert HE
5 Level 5
6 UK credits 40
7 ECTS credits 20
8 Core or Compulsory or Optional Core
9 Acceptable for FdA Musical Theatre
FdA Professional and Commercial
Dance
10 Excluded combinations None
11 Pre-requisite or co-requisite None
12 Class contact time: total hours Total Hours: 300
13 Independent study time: total hours Total Hours: 100
14 Duration of the module 30 weeks
15 Main campus location Knightstone Campus
16 Module co-ordinator Abigail Burkinshaw
17 Additional costs involved None
18 Brief description and aims of module
In this module, students will continue their professional development as a
technical artist in Acting, Singing and Dance (ballet, tap and jazz). Building on
previously acquired skills, students will undertake increasingly sophisticated
practical work and develop a sense of their self as an “intelligent performer” by
understanding how particular skills intersect with the professional world of
musical theatre and professional dance performance.
While continuing to receive training in all three disciplines, students’ practical
work will be more focused on their chosen field(s) of specialisation, and they will
Page 58 of 143
assume an increased responsibility for leading parts of the skills training within
their specialist field. (Graduate Attributes 1, 3)
19 Outline syllabus
The module has a practical focus. Emphasis is placed on frequent repetition and
practice of skills and techniques of acting, singing/voice and dance (ballet, tap
and jazz).
Leading on from the work studied at level 4, students will continue to develop
and improve technical skills in core disciplines, but with a greater outlook on
advanced performance techniques.
Indicative examples for study:-
Singing:
• Onsets, decays and releases to assist phrasing
• Phrase weight and placement in line with musical interpretation
• Acting the song
• Stylistic approaches, i.e. Rock, Gospel, Pop, Opera etc.
Acting:
• Concepts of analysis for moderns plays
• Mechanical and physical approaches to acting
• Psychodynamic Clinical Theory in Contemporary Texts
Dance:
• Techniques for jumps (ballet and jazz)
• The work of practitioners such as Matt Mattox and Luigi (jazz)
Page 59 of 143
• Black bottom (tap)
20 Teaching and learning activities
This module will be taught through tutor-led practical workshops and will include
practical student presentations. There will be a strong emphasis on student
contributions, with a requirement to undertake substantial practical and research
assignments and to arrive at class ready to share their work in a professional
manner. During the module, you will receive informal feedback and more formal
Formative Assessments that will help you to identify your strengths and
weaknesses in advance of the graded module assessments.
Master classes: A number of established practitioners and industry
professionals offer workshops and seminars on a range of skills and practices.
21 Intended learning outcomes
By successful completion of the module, you will be able to
demonstrate:
1. The ability to function as a constructive and creative participant
in the work covered. (A7, B1, C2)
2. Critical, reflective and creative skills in relation to your on-going
practical training in singing, dance and acting. (A1, B4, C1)
3. The ability to apply all three core performance skills (acting,
singing and dance) to the creative contexts of the module’s work.
(A3, B3, C1)
How
assessed
S2
S1, S2
S2
22
Assessment and feedback
Formative exercises and tasks:
F1. Proposal for an oral presentation
Summative assessments:
S1. Presentation of portfolio of class work
Weighting%
15%
Page 60 of 143
S2. Practical (Performances of technical skills studied in the
module)
85%
23 Learning resources
University Library print, electronic resources and VLE:
•Adrian, B. (2008). Actor Training the Laban Way: An Integrated Approach to
Voice, Speech, and Movement. New York: Allworth Press.
•Carter, A & O‟Shea. (ed.) (2010) The Routledge Dance Studies Reader
Second Edition. London and New York: Routledge
•D’Albert, C. (2013) Dancing, Technical Encyclopaedia of the Theory and
Practice of the Art of Dancing. London: The Noverre Press.
•Fraleigh, S H. (1995). Dance and the Lived Body. Pittsburgh: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
•Hamady, J. (2016) The Art of Singing on Stage and in the Studio:
Understanding the Psychology, Relationships, and Technology in Recording
and Live Performance. New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers
•Melton, J. (2007). Singing in Musical Theatre: The Training of Singers and
Actors. New York: Allworth.
•Pugh, M. (2016) America Dancing: From the Cakewalk to the Moonwalk. New
Haven: Yale University Pr
•Seibert, B. (2015) What the Eye Hears: A History of Tap Dancing. New York:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
•Wilson, P. (1997). The Singing Voice: An Owner's Manual. Sydney: Currency
Press
Specialist resources:
Bespoke studio spaces
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces,
audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in
word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts
Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources
and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection.
Page 61 of 143
24 Preparatory work
Continued development of physical fitness, flexibility and vocal health which will
benefit progress on this module. Taking fitness classes, using gym equipment in
order to improve cardio vascular fitness will help to strengthen the muscles and
respiratory tract regardless of prior experience.
Page 62 of 143
Code DR5502-40
Title PERFORMANCE PROJECT
Programme Drama
Level 5
Credits 40
ECTS 20
Contact time 150 Hours (including rehearsals with professional practitioners).
Acceptable for FdA Musical Theatre students only
Excluded combinations All other students
Core/Optional Core
Module Co-ordinator Sylvia Lane
Description
This module builds on the learning and understanding gained in Performance Workshop through one or more performance projects. You will have the opportunity to work as part of a company in the preparation and performance of a musical theatre piece and to work with professional practitioners either as a performer and/or as an Assistant Director or Assistant Choreographer. You will be expected to function as an active member of the company and will be required to contribute to the research and preparation work as well as working on individual roles.
Outline Syllabus & Teaching & Learning Methods
This module will be taught through workshops, rehearsals and directed study. You will be expected to participate actively in all sessions and will be expected to complete substantial assignments outside class time, including practical work and research tasks. During the module, you will receive informal feedback and more formal Formative Assessments that will help you to identify your strengths and weaknesses in advance of the graded module assessments.
Learning Resources
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces, audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection. Masterclasses: A number of established practitioners and industry professionals offer workshops and seminars on a range of skills and practices.
Intended Learning Outcomes How assessed
1. Demonstrated ability to operate confidently within a professionally led rehearsal and production process.
2. Demonstrated ability to engage critically, reflectively and practically in the preparation and performance of a musical theatre work.
3. Ability to communicate ideas through the application of appropriate performance vocabularies and techniques.
Portfolio Portfolio Performance
Page 63 of 143
Assessment Scheme
FORMATIVE
• Key performance milestones
SUMMATIVE Weighting %
• Portfolio of Class work (Written assignment, Oral Presentation)
• Barstow, A. (1988). The Directors Voice, Theatre Communications Group, New York.
• Berkson, R. (1990). Musical Theatre Choreography: Practical Method for Preparing and Staging Dance. A & C Black Publishers Ltd. London.
• White, M. (1999). Staging a Musical. London: Routledge.
• Oddey, A. (1994). Devising Theatre - a practical and theoretical handbook, Routledge, New York.
❖Go to Contents
Page 64 of 143
Code DR5503-20
Title MUSICAL THEATRE IN CONTEXT 2
Programme Drama
Level 5
Credits 20
ECTS 10
Contact time 52 Hours
Acceptable for FdA Musical Theatre students only
Excluded combinations All other students
Core/Optional Core
Module Co-ordinator Amy Rose
Description
Building on the work in Musical Theatre in Context 1, this module will allow you to explore the musical as a cultural phenomenon by looking at the wider influences that have shaped the musical, and the way in which the musical has reflected, challenged and commented on the cultural and social “status quo”.
Outline Syllabus & Teaching & Learning Methods
Throughout the module, you will have the chance to explore the wider cultural and social significance of musical theatre by studying the intersection of the musical with topics such as race, gender and sexuality as well as the economic and cultural shifts that have led to shifts in producing models. Indicative areas of study might include the relationship between the musical and gay culture; women and the musical; gender, sexuality and power in the musical; black musical theatre; “orientalism” and the musical; the economic and cultural factors behind the shift in producing models from e.g. the “Golden Age” commercial model to Disney and the American non-profit musicals. This module will be taught through a mixture of tutor-led lectures and workshops and student presentations. This module will also develop your core academic skills in areas such as research methodologies, planning and writing argumentative essays, and correct use of sources - you will be expected to conduct research into key works and practitioners and to share these through in-class presentations and written work. During the module, you will receive informal feedback and more formal Formative Assessments that will help you to identify your strengths and weaknesses in advance of the graded module assessments.
Learning Resources
The module draws on a range of specialist studios and workshop spaces, audio/visual equipment and resources. Students must submit all written work in word-processed form; they have computer access via the HE Performing Arts Computer Suite, along with access to physical and online learning resources and remote internet access to the Library’s electronic collection. Masterclasses: A number of established practitioners and industry professionals offer workshops and seminars on a range of skills and practices.
Page 65 of 143
Intended Learning Outcomes How assessed
1. Demonstrated ability to engage critically and reflectively with key musical theatre movements and repertoire from 1900-present.
2. Demonstrated ability to research and communicate findings about a specific area of musical theatre history using appropriate ICT skills.
3. Demonstrated ability to research, organise and execute a formal argumentative essay.
Portfolio; Written Assignment Portfolio Written
Assessment Scheme
FORMATIVE
• Mock presentations
• Essay outline
SUMMATIVE Weighting %
• Research Portfolio
• Written assignment
25%
75%
Reading Lists/Key Texts & Websites
• Banfield, S. (1993). Sondheim’s Broadway Musicals. University of Michigan Press. Michigan
• Kenrick J. (2008). Musical Theatre: A History. London: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
• Lundskaer-Nielsen, Miranda. (2008). Directors and the New Musical Drama: British and American Musical Theatre in the 1980 and 90s. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Riddle, P H. (2003). American Musical: History and Development. Oakville: Mosaic Press.
This process of reflection and synthesis is the key to the way you progress
developmentally throughout each module, and therefore the whole course. In simple
terms, the more you reflect on what you do in one assessment activity, and then
build on that for the next one, the more you will develop. With this in mind, the staff
set a combination of the activities within each assessment task to measure your
learning accurately, but also to encourage your process of reflection and synthesis.
The assessment tasks and order of assessment activities within them encourage
you to engage in the necessary reflection. You must therefore keep an actor’s
logbook
Page 73 of 143
• Assesses your ability to do the job of acting, scriptwriting or directing
• Assesses how you utilise all the elements of your training to underpin your performance work
• The activities in this task are incremental: they move from presenting in class, through workshop presentations to public performances
• The Personal Development Plan evaluates your performance work and its preceding processes
• Assesses your ability to self-evaluate, analyse, identify strengths and weaknesses and plan strategies to focus your development
• In years 1 and 2, the activities are self-evaluations/action plans related to your development across the course
• These ask you to consider how you can improve your ability to learn
• In year 3, the activity is a professional profile event that requires you to utilise your knowledge of your strengths and weaknesses to positively promote yourself in a realistic workplace scenario: the focus is on planning for a professional career.
• Your PDP draws on the contents of your Actor’s Logbook
• The PDP reflects university and QAA guidelines
• Your PDP draws on the academic skills required to create your academic file
Assessment tasks presume you work steadily at improving your practical skills and that you work closely and consistently with your group. Poor attendance therefore has a direct impact on several areas of assessment as follows.
• HEALTH AND SAFETY – Missing practical classes raises health and safety issues, both in terms of your personal practice and your work with others. If you do not attend enough classes in preparation for an assessment activity, staff must consider if you can perform the activities safely. They reserve the right to withdraw you from an assessment task because you fail to meet that basic requirement.
• PROFESSIONALISM – Some tasks assess your understanding of, and responsiveness to, professional etiquette. For example, performers often perform 8 times a week: they cannot be absent or late. If anybody is late on a film set, it costs tens of thousands of pounds for every minute wasted. The industry demands good timekeeping and reliability. Some tasks assess how reliable you are. Again, if you fail to meet such professional standards (for example in a production module) the director/choreographer will re-cast you or the production manager replace will you.
• COLLABORATIVE WORKING – Some tasks assess the way you work with others. If you are working on a group project, your poor attendance prevents others from working effectively. This not only means you fail to fulfil the assessment criteria, but if your failure has a negative impact on the others in your team, staff reserve the right to withdraw you from an assessment task to ensure your colleagues’ assessment is not jeopardised.
The following table explains how attendance and professional discipline issues influence assessment. It matches professional practice against the required academic practice and identifies the action staff will take if you fail to achieve the required standards.
WITHDRAWAL FROM ASSESSMENT
ISSUE PROFESSIONAL EXPECTATION
ACADEMIC EQUIVALENT
ACTION TAKEN
LATENESS The industry expectation is that you will arrive 30 minutes before rehearsals
If you arrive after the tutor calls the register for class, you are late.
The tutor will mark this as an unauthorised absence
Whether absence is authorised or not, employers reserve the right to remove you from a project if they believe your absence is having a detrimental effect on the production and/or cast morale. Similarly, if you fail to learn lines/routines, endanger others or fail to behave responsibly, producers will re-cast you or remove you from the project.
If you are absent 3 times from a group project – whether the absence is authorised or not. **
The tutor will withdraw you from the relevant group or modular assessment activities. This will lead to a mark of zero for those activities. Should you successfully apply for mitigating circumstances, you can re-take the activities and receive the full mark. If you have not made an application for mitigating circumstances or if your application is unsuccessful, you will have the chance to re-sit the activity. However, if you pass at this attempt, your overall module grade will be capped at 40%.
If your absence in any
aspect of a module of
study (for example
technical classes or
production rehearsals)
falls below a level
where your practice is
no longer safe or
reliable.
** You will receive a warning after 2 absences (be these lateness or non-attendance) ❖Go to Contents
Page 83 of 143
The module outlines not only give a brief description of the kinds of assessment
activity on the course, but they also indicate the qualities that the staff look for in
your work. These qualities are assessment criteria. As the course develops in
complexity, the assessment activities become harder and the criteria by which the
staff measure your learning reflect this.
Assessment in HE requires a lot of careful planning to ensure that the activities
demonstrate to your tutors that you have truly learned what they have taught you.
The staff cannot say how much of the course learning outcomes you have learned,
because they are not inside your head. Instead, they set assessment tasks and look
at how well you do them. The principle is that if you can perform the assessment
activities, then you must have learned: the assessment activities indicate your level
of learning.
For any assessment activity, there is a threshold of knowledge and ability that
assures your tutors that you have learned enough of the basics. That threshold is
40%. If you step over that threshold, then you have done enough to pass. In reality,
most of the time you will do more than just step over the threshold, and in assessing
your work, tutors have to decide how far over that threshold you have stepped. To
help them decide, the assessment criteria are qualities like how broad is your
knowledge? How deep is your understanding? How effective? How sensitive? In
other words, the criteria ask the staff to quantify the qualities your work
demonstrates. Obviously, the better the quality of your work, the higher your grades.
100% is the maximum, and 40% is the minimum pass and the staff make a
judgement about where you on a scale of 0 to 100.
As the course progresses, the tasks get harder (if they didn’t, then you wouldn’t
really learn anything), so if you get 50% in one task, and then 50% in the next, you
have clearly improved, because the second task was harder. If you want to improve
your grades, you have to do more than just maintain your level of engagement, you
have to work hard and consistently. It is no good pulling it out of the hat in the
performance; you have to work hard all the way through.
❖Go to Contents
Page 84 of 143
Page 85 of 143
Grading criteria explian how lecturers quantify your achievement. In marking an
assessment activity, staff look at the work you produce and the assessment criteria
against which they judge the quality of that work. So if you submit an essay and one
of the criteria is the clarity of your writing, then the staff use the grading criteria to
detemrine how clear your writing is. In simple terms assessment criteria define the
quality the work should demonstrate, the grading criteria define how your tutors
quantify that quality.
❖Go to Contents
Page 86 of 143
Find out more about
• The Attendance Policy
• Referencing
• Plagiarism
• Mitigating Circumstances
To treat everybody on the course fairly and equally there have to be rules and
regulations. Some of these are University-wide and others are specific to this
course. Our aim is not to be difficult, but to ensure your training prepares you for the
realities of the professional environment. This section introduces you to the key
policies and regulations that govern your time here at university. Some of them you
will need to know intimately, others you will only need to refer to from time to time.
In such a large institution there are many policies and procedures, all of which you
will find online here, but the ones here are the critical ones that you really must know
Bath Spa University regulations on attendance state:
Students will be regarded as in attendance at the University whether they are present within the University buildings or engaged elsewhere on some legitimate activity pursuant to the programme (e.g. attending a field course), always provided that they maintain regular academic contact with tutors and adhere satisfactorily to the programme for which they are registered.
We do not assess your attendance, but because all DoPA courses involve some practical element, poor attendance will have a negative impact on your grades.
If you are not in class, you will not learn! Students who fail to attend class soon fall behind in their studies. Unlike other subjects, you cannot cram or revise physical training. Once you fall behind in a practical subject, it is impossible to catch up.
As part of your preparation for a professional career, we expect you to meet industry standards surrounding punctuality and attendance. Staff accept some absences are unavoidable, but they expect you to keep these to a minimum. A legitimate absence is authorised in one of two ways. TO REQUEST AN ABSENCE IN ADVANCE – If you know in advance that you cannot be in class, for example to attend a funeral or for an essential medical appointment, you must seek permission from the Subject Leader. You must do so no later than 24-hours before the appointment. However, you should plan any personal appointments for times when you are not in class. The Subject Leader will only authorise an absence if you can prove that it is important and its timing essential. FOR ANY SICK LEAVE YOU MUST SELF-CERTIFICATE – We encourage you to work through minor illnesses, as you would do in a professional situation. We do not expect you to work on an injury, but we do expect you to attend class and observe. Minor colds, sore throats, aches and pains are unavoidable and you need to learn how to work through them. However, if you are genuinely unwell and cannot attend class, then the professional practice is to contact the company manager about any potential absence: this course applies the same principle.
• You must self-certificate all periods of sickness absence, but you should provide photocopies of any prescription or medical appointment cards to verify your self-certification.
• Any absence longer than 7 calendar days must be supported by a doctor's medical certificate. Failure to produce a doctor's medical certificate will result in the absence being considered unauthorised.
To request an absence or to self-certificate for sick leave click on the link below.
ABSENCE REPORT FORM
We need to be clear – we want you to record authorised absences so that should you have to apply for mitigating circumstances you have evidence to support your request. Any absence not described above, or not reported as described above, is unauthorised and unacceptable. This does not meet the required standard of professional etiquette required of the course. Unauthorised absence are as follows. UNAUTHORISED ABSENCE – If you fail to self-certificate an absence or if you fail to request an absence, this counts as unauthorised absence. If you have not arrived in class before the tutor has taken the register you are last and the tutors will record this as an unauthorised absence. Any unauthorised absence or pattern of repeated absence may result in your withdrawal from an assessment event. The College term times are in this handbook. It is your responsibility to make sure you record these accurately and do not arrange any holiday leave during published term times or reading weeks. Staff will record any such absence as unauthorised, and the penalty for unauthorised or unreported absence will apply. We strongly advise you to inform your family and friends of these dates too. Sometimes, with the best of intentions, they will book birthday or Christmas treats for you. If they contact us, data protection law means we cannot acknowledge you are even a student here. We can only speak to them about you if you give us written permission (which somewhat kills the nature of the surprise). We don’t want to spoil anybody’s fun (especially a surprise trip), but end of term is usually a major assessment point, so we will not give permission for you to be absent. Marking Guide - Performance
Indicative
Mark Range Criteria
FIRST CLASS CATEGORY – 1st
90-100 % The work is profoundly original with a high degree of accomplishment in all respects. It is of a professional standard meriting public presentation.
The work is innovative and authoritative, demonstrating evidence of intellectual rigor, independence of judgement and insightful contextualisation including relevant theory/literature/artefacts/performance. The practice is very accomplished technically, sophisticated in style, original and imaginatively realised, with no significant technical errors.
70–79 %
The work is coherent and imaginative, with an excellent grasp of its material. It is technically accomplished and has been approached and/or executed/performed in an original way, with no serious technical errors. There is an exceptionally well-assimilated consideration of audience and performance context and demonstrates high levels of initiative, clarity, playfulness, personal responsibility, decision-making and achievement.
UPPER SECOND CLASS CATEGORY – 2:1
60 – 69 %
The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a comprehensive and appropriate way showing creativity and originality. The work may show breadth and depth of response, which could compensate for some weaknesses in the coherence of practical work in relation to course concerns. The performance material and its execution is consistently of a high standard although some fluency is lost in the presentation of the work and the overall cohesion. There is a well-assimilated consideration of audience and performance context. The individual student demonstrates playfulness and an ability to function as a cohesive member of an ensemble. In some cases this mark will be awarded where, although the practical work has been well achieved, the general guidelines of the assessment criteria have not been met in full, e.g., inability to work in a group, uneven commitment to practical work, a critical appraisal that is sound but lacks sustained coherence of argument.
LOWER SECOND CLASS CATEGORY – 2:2
50 – 59 %
The work has been approached and/or executed/performed in a standard way showing that a portion of the course material has been absorbed; there will be some understanding of the central ideas in practice. Some practical work will have a relevance to the course work, and there is occasional creativity demonstrated. There is a satisfactory consideration of audience and performance context. The individual student demonstrates some playfulness and a fairly standard ability to function as a member of an ensemble.
THIRD CLASS CATEGORY – 3rd
40 – 49 %
An attempt to undertake the practical work and/or complete the brief has been made to an adequate, albeit weak, response to the task. There is a threshold consideration of audience and performance context. The individual student demonstrates some playfulness and a basic ability to function as a member of an ensemble although there may be serious omissions in one or more areas. The student is not confident in performance and needs more control over the material and its execution. The individual student demonstrates some playfulness and a basic ability to function as a member of an ensemble although there may be serious omissions in one or more areas and the work is not consistent or sustained. Key weaknesses in practical work, such as lack of attendance, limited commitment to the group, or idleness within practice, will be taken into account.
FAIL CATEGORY
30 - 39 %
The work shows a very limited ability to recognise the issues represented by the practical brief. It may show some evidence of commitment to the course practice but a clear inability to use this work within the given practical assignment(s). The performance material and its execution is of an extremely poor standard. The work demonstrates no consistent or sustained engagement. There are significant omissions in the consideration of audience and performance context. The individual student demonstrates little or no playfulness and the threshold ability to function as a member of an ensemble may be absent or excessively poor.
Page 90 of 143
20-29% The work has insufficient evidence of commitment to the course practice with little evidence of understanding what was required.
1-19% There is little to no evidence of commitment to the course practice with inappropriate materials and submissions.
0% Failure to submit work
Marking Guide: Written
Indicative
Mark Range Criteria
FIRST CLASS CATEGORY – 1st
First-class work (70% or above) should be outstanding and show creative or original thought. It should demonstrate an accurate grasp of the issues raised by the question or brief, as well as an excellent knowledge of appropriate texts, techniques, and relevant theoretical perspectives. The essay should conduct a sustained, coherent argument in a style that is fluent and should demonstrate excellent skills in marshalling appropriate evidence. The following criteria apply within the band:
90-100 % The essay/presentation is highly lucid in style and outstanding in its originality: a genuine contribution to knowledge meriting publication in current or revised form in an academic journal. There are no errors in spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
80-89% The essay/presentation presents a rigorous and sophisticated analysis with a high degree of originality/independent thought, is lucidly and gracefully written, and contains no significant errors in spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
70 –79%
The essay/presentation presents a cogently argued analysis that shows an excellent grasp of its
material, is lucidly written, and contains no serious errors in spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
There is clear evidence of originality and insight and an ability to sustain an argument and/or solve
discipline-related problems, based on critical analysis and/or evaluation. An authoritative grasp of
concepts, methodology and content appropriate to the module content and to the assessment
task will be demonstrated
UPPER SECOND CLASS CATEGORY – 2:1
60 – 69%
The essay/presentation is likely to demonstrate some creativity and originality or breadth and
depth of response. It is likely to present ideas with a sense of analysis, reflection and coherence
demonstrating a sound and above average level of understanding of concepts, methodology and
content appropriate to the subject/discipline and to the assessment task. The work is well
organised, coherent and the standard of presentation, including referencing where appropriate, is
at least good; this should include a good standard of grammar and syntax. This grade might
alternatively be awarded where the quality of the argument is mitigated by clear weaknesses in
written expression, e.g. a detailed answer, with considerable insights, marred by a lack of fluency,
poor organisation of material or persistent grammatical or syntactical irregularities.
LOWER SECOND CLASS CATEGORY – 2:2
50 – 59%
The essay/presentation demonstrates work of a sound quality which is based on satisfactorily
referenced sources and/or creative input and which demonstrates a grasp of relevant material
and key concepts, together with the ability to structure and organise arguments or materials
effectively. There is a partial recognition of issues and the material presented has some focus with
a sense of direction. There is some understanding of the need to construct an argument, although
Page 91 of 143
this may not be fully sustained or relevant. Received ideas may be acknowledged but not
interrogated. The work is of a suitable standard of presentation, including referencing where
appropriate. This class is also appropriate where much of the content seems worthy of a higher
grade but where poor syntax, grammar, etc., obscure meaning.
THIRD CLASS CATEGORY – 3rd
40 – 49%
The essay/presentation makes an attempt to answer the question or fulfil the brief, but without understanding its implications. There is evidence of research, and a reasonable level of understanding, but the approach tends to the descriptive and may show difficulties in analysis and argument. Problems with written expression and use of grammar, syntax and spelling may impede readers’ understanding.
FAIL CATEGORY
30 – 39%
The essay/presentation demonstrates an unsatisfactory response to the task. The work shows evidence that the candidate has not understood central ideas or presented material relevant to the question or brief. The understanding shown is simplistic, the approach tends to be descriptive, and consistent difficulties in style, expression and/or presentation obscure any argument. Organisation is excessively disordered. The written work is superficial, with little or no evidence of the candidate having studied the work set for the course.
20-29%
The essay/presentation demonstrates work which indicates insufficient evidence of engagement
with the subject material and learning process; which contains substantial errors or irrelevancies;
which shows minimal evidence of planning and there is no use of references and
acknowledgement of sources; which clearly fails to meet threshold standards at the level
concerned. The work reveals substantial misunderstandings, over-simplifications and/or
inaccuracies; expression, organisation and presentation are poor.
1-19% The essay/presentation demonstrates little to no evidence of commitment to the task and subject
material.
0% Failure to submit work
❖Go to Contents
Page 92 of 143
Professionally, for any unauthorised absence employers would reduce your pay.
Likewise, if your absence were such that it delayed the production process, your
employers would remove you from the production and replace you, even if for
unavoidable absence. Accordingly, the following penalty system applies on the
course.
TYPE OF
ABSENCE
PROFESSIONAL
STANDARDS
PENALTY
INCURRED IF… PENALTY
LATENESS
The industry
expectation is that you
will arrive 30 minutes
before rehearsals
begin to allow time for
personal preparation
…you arrive after the
tutor calls the register
for class
The tutor will mark you
absent and not allow
you into the class
INSUFFICIENT
ATTENDANCE
(Module handbooks
indicate to which
assessment activities
this rule applies)
Whether absence is
authorised or not,
employers reserve the
right to remove actors
from a project if they
believe that their
absence is having a
detrimental effect on
the production and/or
cast morale.
... you are absent 2
times from any project
where your absence
affects the work of
others, this is whether
the absence is
authorised or not.
The tutor will deny
you the opportunity to
take part in the
relevant group or
modular assessment
activities. This will lead
to a mark of zero for
those activities. Should
you successfully apply
for mitigating
circumstances, you
can re-take the
activities and receive
the full mark. If you
have not made an
application for
mitigating
circumstances or if
your application is
unsuccessful, you will
have the chance to re-
sit the activity.
However, if you pass at
this attempt, your
overall module grade
will be capped at 40%.
... your absence in any
unit of a module of
study (for example
technique classes or
production rehearsals)
falls below 80%,
whether the absence is
authorised or not.
Page 93 of 143
The University term times are listed in this handbook. It is your responsibility to
make sure you record these accurately and do not arrange any holiday leave during
published term times or reading weeks. Staff will record any such absence as
unauthorised, and the penalty for unauthorised or unreported absence will apply.
We strongly advise you to make sure your family and friends know these dates too,
so that they don’t book any surprise trips during term times. In our experience some
family and friends with the best of intentions will book birthday or Christmas treats
for you, but not check your term dates first. We don’t want to spoil anybody’s fun
(especially a surprise trip), but ends of terms are usually major assessment points,
which you have to attend.
❖Go to Contents
Page 94 of 143
To read Bath Spa University’s Academic Regulations click here
Bath Spa University has adopted two alternative house styles: these are Harvard
and Numeric. The Department of Performing Arts has adopted the Harvard (or
‘Author-date’ system) as its house style so all written work should conform to this.
You must use the following format that is accepted in academic writing and
publishing. Further details of the Harvard system are available here.
You must present your own words, your own analysis and your own argument. It is
acceptable to use the work of others to support arguments and analysis, and tutors
will inform you as to what constitutes good practice and give you help with areas
such as referencing and the provision of footnotes. If you are in any doubt about
what constitutes good practice rather than plagiarism, consult your tutors for advice.
Plagiarism (presenting the ideas or words of others as if they were your own) is a
serious academic offence; if your tutors suspect this, they will report it to the Unfair
This section explains the University systems for maintaining the quality of the
programme. The staff all take quality very seriously and spend much of their meeting
time ensuring that everything is done correctly. This is to ensure that you can trust
the marks you get for your work and that staff respond to your suggestions and
those of people like the external examiner.
❖Go to Contents
Page 99 of 143
The course went through several processes to assure the University that its
standards were of the highest quality. Those processes are on-going, and the team
and the subject leader monitor the course throughout the academic year. They will
ask you to contribute to that process in several ways. This section outlines the key
quality processes used to create this course and used to monitor it through each
academic year. If you wish to read further, go to the Academic Office pages on the
University’s website.
Before the course started, the University checked that
• There would be enough qualified staff to teach the course
• Adequate resources were in place
• The overall aims and objectives were appropriate
• The content of the course met national benchmark requirements
• The course met any professional/statutory body requirements
• The proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policies, teaching, learning and assessment strategies and student support mechanisms.
The University did this by consulting academic experts, including subject specialists
from other institutions – both academic and professional. This final version of the
handbook reflects any changes made in response to any comments raised during
this iterative process. Here are some of the comments advisors made.
The Writing and Learning Centre is a service for the whole Bath Spa University community. It aims to improve student learning, enhance the student experience, and help you reach your potential during your degree. No matter how old you are, what kind of grades you're getting, what you're studying, or what your background is, it can help. For more information read here.
Students with dyslexia or other specific learning needs are welcome to use our services, but should also contact Student Support on [email protected]
AUTHOR: PROFESSOR PAUL DAVIES, VICE-PROVOST (LEARNING AND
TEACHING QUALITY)
1. Background
1.1 This paper deals only with ethical considerations relating to non-clinical research.
1.2 Consideration of research ethics must take into account the legal framework.
Relevant legislation includes The Data Protection Act 1984 (and subsequent), The
Children’s Act 1989 (and subsequent) and various ‘privacy’ laws. As the legal
obligations relating to research ethics are not covered by any single Act, research
organisations have generally responded to their obligations via policy documents,
codes of practice or similar.
1.3 Many higher education institutes have developed a research ethics policy and
mechanisms for formally agreeing the arrangements with respect to the gathering
and storage of data in projects where ethical considerations justify it. This is usually
separate from the formal agreement of the project as a viable project. Good practice,
through Codes of Practice, has also been developed by a number of professional
bodies, for example by the British Sociological Association and the British
Psychological Society. Research active members of those organisations are obliged
to adhere to these Codes of Practice in addition to any organisational codes.
1.4 This document proposes a way in which BSU deals with ethical issues related to
non-clinical research. It seeks to ensure that research ethics are considered in all
research projects undertaken, and to formally scrutinise and agree procedures
relating to individual defined projects where it is appropriate to do so. It therefore
outlines the issues that need consideration and proposes Principles (which must be
adhered to by all who undertake research -defined fully in Appendix 1a), and
Procedures and Practice (to be followed when specific approval is required – see
below).
2. Definition of research subject to ethical considerations and definition of
researchers included
2.1 For the purposes of this document research means all research that involves
human participants as subjects undertaken as a part of formal University activity.
The phrase ‘human participants’ refers to persons used in all types of research.
Qualitative based research projects may include personal interviews, questionnaires,
Appendix 1
Page 122 of 143
interviews, focus groups, observation of groups etc. Quantitative and experimental
research may include questionnaires, surveys, trials etc.
2.2 Research included is that undertaken by:
• Undergraduate students undertaking research as part (or all) of an undergraduate qualification
• Directors of Studies and supervisors of students
• All staff doing personal research, collaborative research with outside organisations, contract research and consultancy
• All staff undertaking research with students or with other members of staff
3. Issues and Principles
3.1 All research involving human participants must consider the following issues from
the inception of the research project. Researchers should be in a position to justify
the decisions undertaken as a result of those considerations should it be required:
• the value of the research
• informed consent
• openness and honesty
• right to withdraw without penalty
• confidentiality and anonymity
• protection from harm
• briefing and debriefing
• reimbursements, payments and rewards
• suitability/experience of researcher
• ethics standards of external bodies and institutions
• reporting on ethical issues throughout
• research for clients/consultants
• intended dissemination
3.2 Some of the above issues require very careful consideration. All are discussed in
detail in Appendix 1a where the Principles governing such considerations are laid
out.
3.3 Ethically responsible conduct is part of the University’s principles of good
research practice (available as a separate document). It states that deliberate,
reckless or negligent research misconduct may lead to disciplinary action via the
Page 123 of 143
University’s disciplinary procedure. It is important to note that honest errors do not
constitute misconduct.
4. Research for which approval is necessary
4.1 If the research project involves either:
Deceptive research (defined below)
or
Covert research where data are recorded in a manner in which anonymity of
participants cannot be assured, or where when the research involves collection of
sensitive personal material (including matters relating to behaviour), or where the
participants are part of a vulnerable group (defined below);
Approval must be sought through the procedures detailed below.
4.2 Deceptive research is that which is undertaken when the investigator deliberately
conceals or significantly misrepresents his or herself, the true nature of the research,
or any other significant aspect of the research (see Appendix 1b).
4.3 Vulnerable group includes any person(s) who may be precluded from giving
informed consent. Note that this does not necessarily include all groups whose
consent is given by parents or by those in loco parentis. It should additionally be
noted that even in those circumstances the ‘real’ consent of those individuals under
study should also be sought wherever possible (see Appendix 1a, informed
consent).
4.4 Approval for research involving human participants not covered within the
categories detailed in Section 4.1 should be sought thorough the school mechanisms
agreed by AQSC on 6th October 2006. All projects must adhere to the Principles.
4.4.1 If there is any doubt as to whether a particular research project needs
approval, advice should be sought from the relevant academic manager.
5. Procedures and Practice for approving research
5.1 Those projects requiring approval under 4 above will be required to seek such
approval through the University’s Research and Scholarship Committee. Advice on
submitting projects requiring approval should be sought from the Chair of that
Page 124 of 143
Committee at an early stage in the formulation of the research proposal. Under no
circumstances should such research be started prior to approval being given.
Appendix 1a - Principles
2 The value of the research
The value of the research, in terms of its original contribution to knowledge, should
be made apparent to all involved wherever possible. Obviously in the case of
deceptive or some covert research this does not apply to participants, but needs to
be justified through the procedures outlined above.
3 Informed consent
Informed consent by individuals, guardians or individuals acting in loco parentis can
be complicated (particularly when children are involved). Except in cases where free
and informed consent is thought not be warranted (ethically acceptable deceptive
and some forms of covert research). The default position is that free and informed
consent should normally be gained in writing from the participant(s) and/or their
properly authorised representative(s). In exceptional cases there may be reasons
why the participant(s) or representative(s) wish not to sign consent themselves. In
such cases the researcher should record consent. Even where an authorised
representative gives consent, the ‘real’ consent of the participant should also be
obtained (see also right to withdraw).
The word informed is important. In order to be informed prior to consenting the
participant should have an understanding of project aims, objectives, any potential
benefits or harm that may arise and likely outcome of the research (eg. policy
documents, publications).
Consent given does not oblige the participant to carry on through the entire research
as originally requested in any formal or legalistic sense. It should, however, be made
clear to participants what commitment they are consenting to, and also that by
consenting they are in effect consenting to carry through the agreement.
The secondary analysis of data through access from their ‘gatekeepers’ does not
negate the researchers involved from considering issues relating to consent except
where the gatekeeper can act in law as the consenter (eg. is a parent or guardian).
4 Openness and honesty
As a default research should be carried out in an honest and open manner, with
participants fully and honestly informed about the research rationale, method(s) and
Page 125 of 143
outcomes (see informed consent above). Some types of research (deceptive and
some forms of covert research) may be exceptions and must be agreed (see above).
5 Right to withdraw without penalty
It should be made apparent to all potential participants, as part of the informed
consent process, that they are free to withdraw without penalty from the research
project, even if they have received inducements or payments. They may also request
that consent be withdrawn retrospectively and that any accrued data regarding them
be destroyed.
Those whose consent has been given through a surrogate can themselves request
to withdraw from the research, a request that must be honoured.
Confidentiality and anonymity
Privacy is normal practice in research and law. Confidentiality and anonymity
becomes a real issue when data is recorded on computer (eg. named responses to
questionnaires) or when named organisations are reported upon where individual
roles cannot be hidden (eg. in action research projects). Data should be coded and
stored in a manner that does not allow direct recognition of individuals within the
stored data set(s) by anyone other than the researcher or research team. Data
should not normally be shared with others without the consent of the subject or their
surrogate. Plans to publish research should therefore be made clear at the outset. If
it is suspected (due to the nature or context of the research work) that anonymity
cannot be guaranteed even if data are coded etc. then this limitation should be made
aware to the participants.
Those who court publicity or are active in the public-eye (speakers at public events,
celebrities etc) are not considered subject to privacy/anonymity rights as outlined
above.
6 Protection from harm
Researchers have a responsibility to ensure that the physical, social and
psychological well-being of research participants is not affected in an adverse
manner by the research. The relationship should one of mutual respect and based,
wherever possible, on trust. Undue risk is considered to be that above and beyond
risks run in the normal everyday life of the participant. Particular care is needed
when the participants are from vulnerable and/or powerless groups. The
responsibility for protection from harm does not necessarily end with the research
project; it may extend to the life of the data set. Particular care needs to be taken
when discussing the results of research projects with those in loco parentis or other
Page 126 of 143
consenting positions, since such discussion may prejudice attitudes toward the
participants.
7 Briefing and debriefing
As well as being informed about the research, participants should be adequately
briefed as to how the research is to be carried out from inception to dissemination
(see informed consent above). Wherever possible participants should also receive
information relating to the outcomes of the research. Sometimes, for example in
some forms of laboratory controlled psychology research, debriefing may involve
remedial action to negate post-participatory effects, for example where negative
moods have been induced. 71
8 Reimbursements, payments and rewards
Any arrangements should be clearly articulated to participants, in writing wherever
possible. If staged or progressive payments are involved these should be clearly
articulated from the beginning. Withdrawal of the participant between stages does
not negate the obligation to reimburse the participant for completed stages.
Reimbursements, payments and rewards may not be used to induce participants to
take undue risk.
9 Suitability/experience of researcher
Investigators should have the relevant academic/professional competence to carry
out the research project. In particular they (meaning either an individual in terms of
an individually-led project, or the ‘team’ in the case of joint research) should have
experience of dealing with the ethical dimensions of the research.
10 Ethics standards of external bodies and institutions
Where external bodies and institutions (either those funding the research, or
professional bodies to which the researcher belongs) have their own ethical codes
these must be followed. If there is any conflict with BSU principles and procedures
Page 127 of 143
these should be identified as soon as possible and the relevant academic managers
notified.
11 Reporting on ethical issues throughout
If there are interim reports, whether verbal or written, ethical issues should be
acknowledged and discussed throughout.
12 Research for clients/consultants
Where it is necessary, ethical positions should be clarified with external clients and
organisations prior to the research beginning. Agreement should preferably be in
writing. It is particularly important to establish data ownership rights and rights to
publish (on both sides), since this establishes future ‘gatekeepers’. Care should be
taken not to compromise the BSU ethics guidelines and/or professional codes.
13 Intended dissemination
Should be relayed to the participant as part of the consent process. Wherever
possible summaries of research findings (preferably in non-technical language)
should be relayed to participants.
APPENDIX 1b – definitions
Deceptive research Research in which the investigator deliberately misrepresents
his/her self, the true nature of the research and/or any other significant characteristic.
Deceptive research may be a necessity, though as part of the procedures
established above the investigator(s) must justify why deception is required.
Covert research Research gathering information about participants (in whatever
form) without the participant’s knowledge or consent. Note that this is not always
problematic, the gaining of ‘naturalistic’ data of ‘normal’ behaviour may not be
unethical, unless it infringes on some of the principles outlined above. Covertly
observing people at public meetings or events is also normally not considered
unethical. Key issues of anonymity and/or recoding of sensitive data must still be
considered.
Gatekeeper An individual or organisation that controls access to data, or has legal
rights with respect to the giving of permission to obtain data. The consent of a
gatekeeper does not, in itself, constitute informed consent on behalf of the
participants unless the gatekeeper also acts in law as the consenting authority for
the participant.
❖Go to Contents
Page 128 of 143
No. Item Detail
1
Policy Statement Weston College is committed to creating an inclusive college, where people are treated with dignity and respect and where we anticipate and respond positively to different needs and circumstances so that everyone can achieve their potential.
We are committed to promoting and advancing equality of opportunity, not only because it is an important part of the mission, vision and values of the College, but also because, by attracting and retaining the most diverse range of talented people as learners, staff and partners, we will ensure the College’s future success.
2 Our Policy Aims • To prevent discrimination
• To promote equality of opportunity
• To promote good relations between people
3 Rights and Responsibilities
Learners, staff, governors, agency workers, visitors and contractors are required to support and uphold the principles set out in the policy. Partners and Employers are expected to maintain these standards when working with Weston College Learners, through their own Equality and Diversity Policies or by adhering to Weston College Policies.
Weston College is responsible for ensuring appropriate equality policies, procedures and structures are in place. The equality and diversity policy is reviewed by the Data, Curriculum and Quality Committee and approved by the Corporation on an annual basis, or earlier where required, for example to respond to legislative changes. Weston College Corporation, the College’s governing body, has overall responsibility for equality and diversity. The commitment of all members of the College’s community is required to make the policy a success. Failure to comply with this Policy by staff or learners will be investigated and may result in them being asked to leave the College.
If you experience or witness any harassment, discrimination or bullying, please report it as soon as possible, even if it is not directed at you personally. Reporting procedures are detailed at Appendix A. The policy is developed within the
WESTON COLLEGE: EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY
Appendix 2
Page 129 of 143
No. Item Detail
framework of UK and European legislation, listed at Appendix B.
4 Implementation The Policy is implemented through the whole of the College’s activities. Our Single Equality Scheme and Action Plan detail how we are continuously improving our equality practice and how we meet our legal requirements under the general and specific equality duties. We monitor and review equality impact through our Equality Risk Assessment process. The whole College community and its partners are represented through our Equality and Diversity Committee. Staff and student equality groups help ensure that all groups within our community are involved in and consulted on College functions.
One Governor has specific responsibilities for equality and diversity and ensures Weston College Corporation is fully informed of developments in this area.
The College has Equality & Diversity Co-ordinator to manage and co-ordinate related activities, facilitate developments and communicate responsibilities to appropriate staff within the College.
We protect children and vulnerable adults through processes set out in our Safeguarding Policy.
5 Definition of Terms
Equality ‘Equality’ means treating all groups of people fairly, providing equality of opportunity and removing barriers to success. It is not about treating everybody the same because different people have different needs. For example, making reasonable adjustments for disabled people (like providing additional time in exams for dyslexic learners) removes barriers to equality of opportunity and helps prevent discrimination. Increasing our understanding of the needs of different groups of people promotes good relations between people.
Equality protected characteristics Equality laws exist to protect the groups of people who have
traditionally faced discrimination. These groups of people
share ‘equality protected characteristics’ such as age,
disability (including physical, mental and learning
impairments), race, sex, pregnancy, maternity and
breastfeeding, gender identity, marriage or civil partnership
status, religion or belief and sexual orientation. Everyone
has several of these protected characteristics therefore
everyone is protected by equality legislation from
discrimination in education, at work and in other situations.
Diversity Valuing diversity means we consider visible and non-visible
individual differences, which include personal characteristics
such as background, culture and personality in addition to
the equality protected characteristics. The aim of managing
diversity is to realise the potential of every individual learner
and staff member.
Harassment Harassment is defined as “unwanted conduct related to a
relevant protected characteristic that has the purpose or
effect of violating an individual’s dignity or creating an
intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive
environment for that individual.” Harassment may include
unwanted behaviour that makes you feel uncomfortable,
even if it was not intended to do so, and even if it was not
directed at you personally. For example, a member of staff
makes comments on a student’s sexuality in a way that
makes the student feel uncomfortable.
Discrimination There are different types of discrimination
• Direct discrimination is treating a person worse than another because of an equality protected characteristic. For example, a college only shortlists male applicants for interview because they assume women will not fit in.
• A person can experience direct discrimination because of a protected characteristic, even if the person does not have the characteristic himself or herself.
• Discrimination based on ‘perception’ occurs when someone is treated worse because they are thought to have a protected characteristic, whether correctly or incorrectly. For example, a college decides not to promote a female employee because senior staff believe her to be pregnant, irrespective of whether she is pregnant or not.
Page 131 of 143
No. Item Detail
• Discrimination because of ‘association’ with someone who has a protected characteristic occurs when, for example, an employee is overlooked for promotion because their partner has undergone gender reassignment.
• Indirect discrimination is when the same rule is applied to everyone but it has a worse impact on people with a particular protected characteristic and cannot be justified. (For example, A college produces an information leaflet for students. It does not produce an easy-to-read version of the leaflet in order to save money. This would make it more difficult for someone with a learning difficulty to access the information and could amount to indirect disability discrimination.)
• Disability-related discrimination or ‘discrimination arising from disability’ and failure to make reasonable adjustments are forms of discrimination unique to disability, that involve treating a disabled person in a particular way that, because of their disability, amounts to treating them unfavourably. For example, a student with diabetes, carrying medication related to their condition, is refused entry by the college to an event with a no drugs policy.
Victimisation Victimisation means treating someone worse than another because s/he has asserted their legal rights in line with equality legislation or helped someone else to do so. For example, a learner alleges that they have encountered racism from a tutor, and as a result they are ignored by other staff members. Bullying Bullying is a form of abuse involving persistent, offensive, abusive, intimidating or insulting behaviour, abuse of power or unfair penal sanctions which makes the recipient feel upset, threatened, humiliated or vulnerable. Bullying may be emotional, verbal or physical and it is not always obvious or apparent to others. It can be between two individuals or it may involve groups of people. Bullying, harassment and discrimination can occur in any media, not just face-to-face actions. For example, it may take the form of written communications, by phone, email,
Page 132 of 143
No. Item Detail
social networking sites, by SMS (texting), screen-savers or posters. Safeguarding is about the protection of children and vulnerable adults and our approach is detailed in our Safeguarding Policy.
6 Policy Review This policy will be reviewed annually or when there are changes in the workplace such as new tools, systems or conditions.
7 Approval Dates This Policy was approved on: 15th July 2011
This version takes effect from: 16th July 2011
This Policy will be reviewed on: 14th July 2012
8 Policy Owner Identify the person that owns this Policy and can be
approached in relation to this:
Data, Curriculum & Quality Committee
Equality and Diversity Policy [appendix A]
Reporting Discrimination, Harassment or Bullying
If you experience or witness harassment, discrimination or bullying, it is
important that you report the incident as soon as possible. Where possible
and appropriate, incidents will be resolved informally, as this approach has
proven to be the most effective at achieving swift resolution.
Staff
Please report incidents to your Line Manager, a member of the Corporate
Management Team, a member of the Human Resources team or a Union
Representative.
Formal cases will be dealt with through the Anti-Harassment and Bullying
Policy, the Grievance Policy and/or the Disciplinary Policy as appropriate to
each individual case.
Learners
Please report incidents to your Tutor, your Head of Faculty, or a member of
1.1 Weston College seeks to continually improve the quality of its services and strives to meet customer expectations. We are committed to providing Higher Education students with a high quality educational experience, supported by excellent academic, administrative and pastoral support services.
1.2 The College welcomes feedback regarding perceived problems so that they can be addressed and improvements made to improve services and enhance the student experience. The college actively encourages Higher Education students to evaluate their course and overall experience providing feedback through module evaluations, student staff liaison committees (SSLC’s) and other forums. We hope to minimise formal student complaints through these means as feedback is addressed and suggestions for improvement implemented.
1.3 Whilst much of the feedback received is positive, it is recognised that at times problems arise. Any person coming into contact with the college who is dissatisfied with their experience can therefore express concern or raise a complaint.
1.4 The College regards the monitoring of complaints as an important aspect of its quality assurance procedures.
1.5 There is an expectation from partner universities that complaints are dealt with by Weston College in the first instance. However, if the complaint is not resolved at that stage a student can pursue a complaint through the appropriate university using their complaints policy.
2. Definition of Terms
2.1 A complaint is defined as an expression of dissatisfaction requiring a response. This could include a complaint raised by a student against another student, member of staff, programme of study, service or facility where the College fails to match either what is promised, or what it would be reasonable to expect.
HIGHER EDUCATION COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE
Appendix 3
Page 136 of 143
2.2 For the purpose of this procedure a student is defined as a person who has been accepted to study on a university validated programme, or a former student who has left the institution within the last three calendar months.
2.3 This procedure does not cover:
• Academic appeals including decisions of examining / subject boards, for which specific procedures exist. (See Course / Module Handbook or refer to your university website for further details).
• Negative or critical feedback relating to the content of courses, modules or programmes, which should be addressed through student representatives / SSLC Meetings and also fed back through module evaluations.
3. General Principles
3.1 Students or other relevant parties are encouraged to raise a concern or complaint as soon as possible after the event has taken place, in order that the matter can be investigated thoroughly and addressed in a timely manner. Complaints would not normally be considered if submitted more than a year after the issue or event occurred, unless there was good reason why the issue could not have been raised sooner.
3.2 Anyone wishing to make a complaint is strongly encouraged to do so personally. A complaint received from a third party (including a parent) will be considered only with the express written permission of the person to whom the complaint relates.
3.3 In order to ensure that a thorough investigation of a complaint is made, the College expects to be able to collect appropriate information from all the parties involved. Where a complaint is made anonymously this is not possible and therefore, no action will normally be taken in the event of an anonymous complaint being raised.
3.4 In some circumstances a complainant might be invited to discuss the complaint, or attend a meeting to establish further details regarding the cause of dissatisfaction or explore the solution being sought. At any meetings held as part of the investigation or procedure the complainant will have the right to be accompanied by one person (for example a friend, relative or Students’ Union representative), who also has the right to speak on behalf of the complainant. However, this person is in addition to the complainant, not a substitute. The complainant must also be present,
Page 137 of 143
unless there is a good reason why this is not possible. Other parties involved in the complaint, including a member of staff who has been the subject of a complaint, will similarly have the right to be accompanied in any meetings, normally by a trade union representative or nominated colleague.
3.5 A group of students may use this procedure to make a collective complaint, but the group must nominate one person to be the main contact for purposes of communication and the spokesperson for the group, representing the group in all matters relating to the complaint.
3.6 All information received as a result of a complaint investigation will remain confidential to those involved in the process. However, it should be noted that, all parties involved in the complaint have the right to know the full details of the complaint, including its source.
3.7 Appropriate staff will be appointed to investigate complaints raised; this would generally be the Academic Registrar but could be another appropriate College Manager as deemed appropriate by the Director of Higher Education. Anyone with a personal interest in the complaint will neither investigate nor adjudicate.
3.8 Students will not be disadvantaged as a result of raising a matter of concern or of making a complaint, provided it is made in good faith. However, if a complaint is shown to be malicious or vindictive, the complaint shall be disregarded and disciplinary / legal action may be taken against the individual who submitted the initial complaint.
4. Advice for Potential Complainants
4.1 All formal complaints should be made in writing and addressed to the Higher
Education Directorate, but please refer to the process below, informal complaints
do not need to be written. Ideally anyone wishing to make a formal complaint
would complete the complaint proforma.
4.2 When submitting a complaint, be brief and to the point, and avoid vague allegations. Where possible, substantiate the complaint by referring to specific events, and provide documentary evidence. Be clear and realistic about what desired outcomes or actions you are expecting.
Page 138 of 143
4.3 Potential complainants may want to obtain advice regarding the procedure
prior to submitting a complaint. Informal advice can be sought from the HE Unit or
the Students Union. Advice may be obtained in person, by telephone or email.
The Students Union will offer additional support and accompany complainants to
meetings if desired.
5. Stages of the Complaints Procedure
The College has developed a staged approach to making a complaint which can be escalated if the complainant does not feel the matter is resolved after the previous stage. These stages must generally be followed in order, and a complaint cannot be taken to a higher level until the lower level is exhausted. If a complaint is sent directly to the Principals office, it will be re-directed to the Higher Education Directorate to appoint an appropriate member of staff to investigate and action.
5.1 Stage 1 - Informal Complaint
The college expects that the majority of complaints can be resolved at an early stage through informal discussion without needing to instigate formal procedures. Therefore if an issue arises the first step is to bring the matter to the attention of the relevant staff, either by email or verbally, and discuss it with them.
If the matter relates to an academic issue a student may wish to approach a tutor or Programme Co-ordinator. Where the complaint is about a support area or service a complainant should contact an appropriate member of staff or the Head of Department. For advice regarding who to approach please contact the Higher Education Directorate office.
Recipients of informal student complaints are responsible for addressing them promptly and fairly. In all these cases the person receiving the issue or complaint should seek to discover the nature of the problem and if possible resolve it there and then. If an immediate solution cannot be found and further investigation is required, the recipient will normally let the student know within seven working days of receiving the initial complaint what steps (if any) will be taken to address the complaint and the expected timescale.
Page 139 of 143
It should be noted that this stage is an informal process and a written record will not normally be made. Staff will be encouraged to share the experience where the effectiveness of their Faculty/Department or Service could benefit.
5.2 Stage 2 - Formal Complaint
If after receiving a response to a Stage 1 complaint, a complainant is not satisfied and wishes to take the complaint further they should submit a complaint in writing to the Academic Registrar.
A formal Stage 2 complaint should be submitted as soon as possible after
receiving a response to the informal complaint. The greater the time delay, the
more difficult it will be for the complaint to be thoroughly investigated. A formal
complaint will not normally be accepted if submitted more than one year after the
complainant was notified of the outcome of the informal complaint, unless there
was good reason why a formal complaint could not have been submitted sooner.
A complainant should submit their complaint by means of a Complaint Form and
submit it to the Academic Registrar outlining the nature of the complaint, what
has been done to try and resolve the situation and what their desired outcome is.
Complaints submitted by letter or email (i.e. not on the complaints form) will be
accepted provided they include all the elements covered within the form.
The Academic Registrar will acknowledge receipt of the complaint within seven
working days, giving an indication of the likely timescale for a full response to be
given. At the same time the Principalship will be notified that the complaint has
been received in order that it can be logged & reported.
An Investigating Officer (IO) will be appointed, normally this would be the
Academic Registrar or another manager deemed appropriate by the Director of
Higher Education . The IO may telephone or meet with the complainant to
discuss the complaint and/or seek more details. This provides the complainant
with the opportunity to present their case and express their concerns. Where a
meeting is held, students may be accompanied by one other person (as set out in
paragraph 3.4), who may participate in the proceedings. The IO will then
investigate the complaint, speaking to concerned parties.
Page 140 of 143
The complainant will receive a full written response to their complaint within 4 to 6
weeks of the complaint being received, providing there are no undue delays, for
example in obtaining further evidence from the complainant or others involved in
the complaint. On very rare occasions where this is not possible, for example
because a complaint is particularly complex, the IO will contact the complainant
at least every 4 weeks to update progress. The response will detail the findings of
any investigation carried out, indicate the outcome, and whether the complaint is
upheld, reasons for the outcome, and explain the proceedings under which the
complainant can, if desired, take the complaint further through Stage 3 of the
Complaints Procedure.
5.3 Stage 3 – Complaints Panel
If following the outcome of the formal stage 2 complaint the complainant is still not satisfied, it may be possible to move to Stage 3 and request that a complaints panel be convened.
Again a Stage 3 appeal should be submitted as soon as possible after receiving a response to the Stage 2 complaint; if it extends beyond the academic year in which they received the response to the initial complaint it will not be accepted, unless there is good reason why it could not have been submitted sooner.
An appeal can only be made if the complainant can demonstrate significant grounds for dissatisfaction with the response, specifically on the basis that there is new evidence for consideration, or that there has been a procedural irregularity in the investigation of the complaint. In this situation an appeal should use the Higher Education Complaints Form (Stage 3) addressed to the Director of Higher Education.
A review panel of three senior members of staff, chaired by the Director of Higher
Education, will be arranged to review the complaint. The complainant must attend
this panel, the other parties will also be present, and all may be accompanied by
another person (as detailed in paragraph 3.4). The Director of Higher Education
will inform the complainant of the outcome within 4-6 weeks.
It should be noted that non-attendance in the Panel meeting constitutes
acceptance of Stage 2 findings
Page 141 of 143
5.4 Stage 4 – Refer to Partner HEI
Once the College’s processes have been exhausted a student may complain to their partner university using their complaints policy. The college will provide all necessary evidence and details pertaining to the complaint to the university as appropriate.
If a complainant is still dissatisfied with the outcome of this decision the matter can
be referred to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OiA) for Higher
Education, provided that your complaint is eligible under its rules. The OiA has
been established to provide an independent scheme for the review of student
complaints. Students will need to refer their complaint to the OiA along with
appropriate documentation within three months of the final decision. Further
details can be obtained from your University or via the OiA website
www.oiahe.org.uk
6. Recording, monitoring, analysis and reporting of complaints
6.1 In order to continually review and enhance the student experience complaints
received are reviewed and monitored. In order to achieve this details of all
complaints are sent to the Principalship who collate the information and prepare
reports presented regularly at Governing Body meetings. In addition these details
are also summarised and presented at the Higher Education Board of Studies
meeting on a termly basis to ensure any common themes can be addressed or
changes to policy can be implemented.
6.2 This policy and the effectiveness of these procedures will be reviewed on a