How to Develop Comprehensive and Compelling Win Themes Bruce Morton, APMP Fellow DRAFT
Jan 12, 2016
How to Develop Comprehensive and Compelling Win Themes
Bruce Morton,APMP Fellow
DRAFT
Differentiation vs. the 10-80-10 model
Differentiation among Contractors• Contractors strive to differentiate themselves BUT• Customers just don’t get it - they think we’re all the sameThe 10-80-10 ModelRef.: Roger Baker, Chief Strategy Officer, Agilex (formerly Veterans Affairs CIO)• Ten percent of contractors are worth fighting to keep because they deliver
results and are focused on making the government customer successful• Ten percent of contractors you should fight to fire because they just don’t
care about results• But with 80 percent of the contractors, it doesn’t matter who gets the work
2
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 3
Far Side Cartoon
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Repetitive Process Perspective
Insanity is doing the same thing over & over again, expecting different results.*
* Source: Albert Einstein
Hope is NOT a Strategy.* * Source: Title of Book by Rick Page, 2002
The idea is to develop an effective and successful process, and use/replicate it over and over again.*
* Source: Bruce Morton
4
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
The 3 C’s for Win Themes(Source: Bruce Morton)
Comprehensive Compelling/Convincing Compliant
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 6
Win Themes – Typical Issues and Pitfalls
Generic Generic Themes vs. Company/Team Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Opportunity Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Solution Specific Themes
Comprehensive Themes focus on one topic vs. Themes focus on all key topics “Our Company” vs. “Our Team”
Compelling “Me Too” vs. “Why Us?” “We” vs. “You” Value Proposition Features vs. Benefits
Proposal: Generic Captions vs. Action CaptionsBruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
Generic Themes vs. Company/Team Specific Themes
Generic Themes– Bullets that most competitors will claim– Reused Filler & Boilerplate
Opportunity Specific Themes– Unique to your company and/or team– Specifically created for this opportunity
Litmus Test: Substitute another company’s name in your win themes and see if anyone realizes the difference
11.21.14 3
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Generic vs. Opportunity Specific Themes - 1Your Generic Win Theme Customer Reaction
We read the RFP You can read! We all learned to in 3rd grade.
We understand what we read OK. You’re capable of understanding what we wrote. So …?
We agree with the customer mission That’s nice, but you really have no choice. Would you actually disagree?
We want to work with you Well, that’s good I guess
We have a Team And this benefits me how?
We have a Program Manager Well, you know you need one!
We have an experienced Program Manager Is the experience specifically relevant to this program?
We have a Management Process Anything special or proven about it?
We can do this Based on what? Any past performance or other evidence?
We have an approach So what is it, and what successful experience is it based on?
8Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
Generic vs. Opportunity Specific Themes – 2
Generic Theme– We have a Team– We have a Management Process– We have a Program Manager– Etc.
Opportunity Specific Theme: Proposed Program Manager has successful relevant experience with customer and with industry– Dr. Andrea Brady will serve as Program Manager, reporting directly to
Ms. Susan Thomas, Operations VP– Dr. Brady has 17 years experience with NASA, and after joining
industry has successfully managed NASA and other spacecraft programs of similar size, scope, and complexity, helping to assure low risk and a high probability of success on the proposed program
11.21.14 4Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Generic vs. Solution Specific Themes - 1
Generic Theme: Vague references to solution capability without actually offering a specific approach or solution
Opportunity Specific Theme: Proposing a specific technical and management approach (backed up by successful past performance)
Litmus Test: Are you offering a specific approach or solution or just talking around it?
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
11
Generic vs. Solution Specific Themes - 2
• Excellent client relationship (with supporting evidence/specific examples)
• Proven performance on relevant Contract A (for related client D1)• Knowledge/insight of data in critical area (political “hot potato”)
via Teammate L• Proven data retrieval process via Contract B (for related client
D2)• Providing a COTS solution that is a proven, secure, successful,
low technical risk, low schedule risk, cost effective approach
11
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo 12
Themes focus on one topic vs. Themes focus on all key topics
Develop and list win themes by key topics – Technical – Management – Schedule– Transition/Phase-In/Start-up– Best Value – Past Performance– Risk– etc.
Develop win themes for each topic to help organize thoughts and avoid skipping tough topics
Also list Potential/Desirable Win Themes in blue font Convert to Win Theme bullets and word-smith on one or more
PowerPoint charts11.21.14 Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
13
“ “Our Company” vs. “Our Team”
Why Team if you’re a prime? Opportunity Specific
– Teammate helps fill out the weaknesses/holes/gaps in the Requirements vs. Capabilities matrix (meatball chart)
– Teammate is incumbent (prime or sub), brings customer experience, brings customer intimacy, has a desirable facility location, has a presence at the customer site; and/or etc.
– Teammate is a certified Small Business; Veteran Owned; Service Disabled Veteran Owned, Woman Owned; HUBZone; and also meets one of the above criteria
Business & Other Considerations – Examples– Quid Pro Quo– We like the company/have worked with them before/they do good work/mentor protégé, etc.
So refer to “Our Team” vs. “Our Company” throughout the proposal
11.21.14 72014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
“Me Too” vs. “Why Us?” – 1
Answer the question: “Why Us?” vs. “Me Too” Value Proposition: What is the benefit of us from the customer(s)
point of view? What is our proposed approach/solution?
– Technical; Management; Schedule; Transition/Phase-in/Start-up; Performance; Best Value; Risk; Etc.
Do our teammates fill out the weaknesses/holes/gaps in our Requirements vs. Capabilities matrix (meatball chart)?
What is the compelling evidence that supports that we and our team can successfully do/perform – what we say? – what we say at low or acceptable risk?
11.21.14 8Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
“Me Too” vs. “Why Us?” – 2
The Death Strategy for a re-compete: “The customer doesn’t like the incumbent so we will win!!!”
Actually, if this is really true, then one of the competitors will likely win, but not necessarily you!!!
Best to assume that the customer does like the incumbent, and then explain why you should win
Still need to answer “Why Us’ vs. “Me Too”
11.21.14 9
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
“We” vs. “You” Value Proposition
What is the benefit from the customer(s) point of view? Change perspective from “we” to “you”:
• Poor: We will achieve a significant improvement in customer satisfaction
• Good: You will see a 30% improvement in customer satisfaction within 9 months as measured by 3rd party customer surveys
• Poor: We are providing a 3 Terabyte hard disk drive• Good: You will have the highest capacity COTS hard disk drive
available todayBruce Morton - 28 May 15
2014 Mid-Atlantic Conference & Expo
Features vs. Benefits
Feature: We are providing a 3 Terabyte hard disk drive– Implication: Isn’t that great?– Problem: Leaves it up to the reader to decide significance
Benefit: You will have the highest capacity hard disk drive available today: 3 Terabyte– COTS (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf)– Meets all requirements– Cost effective– Available now: low schedule risk and low technical risk
11.21.14 11
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Win Themes: Review Techniques - 1Source: Bruce Morton
1. Cross Out Bullets• Put Win Theme bullets on PowerPoint chart• Cross out all generic strategy bullets• Cross out all bullets that most competitors will claim • See what’s left (may not be much)• Review/discuss and figure out how to mitigate
18
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 19
Win Themes: Review Techniques - 2
2. Typical Issues & Pitfalls Carefully and critically evaluate Win Themes against each
bullet of “Win Themes - Typical Issues & Pitfalls” Generic
Generic Themes vs. Company/Team Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Opportunity Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Solution Specific Themes
Comprehensive Themes focus on one topic vs. Themes focus on all key topics “Our Company” vs. “Our Team”
Compelling “Me Too” vs. “Why Us?” “We” vs. “You” Value Proposition Features vs. Benefits
Identify and Mitigate any issues
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Win Themes - Review Techniques - 3Source: Bruce Morton
3. Create Loss Debriefing Create a customer debriefing for the loss Use prior loss debriefings as a source (ref. next page)
– Example - Best Value: lost because cost differential (vs. the winner) was too high
Identify and Mitigate any issues
20
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Customer Loss Debriefings - Examples
1. “The Offeror appears to understand the Program, but the lack of specificity made it difficult to evaluate and fully assess the viability of their proposed solution.”
2. “The Offeror’s proposed price reflects multiple omissions in their proposal and a relatively low number of bid labor hours. The labor mix for Task Orders 03-05 is not realistic (i.e. too low).”
3. “The Offeror’s proposed price is too high (vs. competitors) to justify the best value benefits that were proposed”
21
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 22
Win Themes – Typical Issues and Pitfalls
Generic Generic Themes vs. Company/Team Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Opportunity Specific Themes Generic Themes vs. Solution Specific Themes
Comprehensive Themes focus on one topic vs. Themes focus on all key topics “Our Company” vs. “Our Team”
Compelling “Me Too” vs. “Why Us?” “We” vs. “You” Value Proposition Features vs. Benefits
Proposal: Generic Captions vs. Action CaptionsBruce Morton - 28 May 15
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 1
In your proposal, the captions should convey the key elements of your story independent of the text– Some customer evaluators are better at reading and
comprehending graphics & captions – Some customer evaluators are better at reading and
comprehending text– Customer evaluators can read their assigned proposal
section, then refer back and copy the captions as justification to support their evaluation score
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
24
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 2
Fig. 1-1: Horse24Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
25
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 3
Fig. 1-2: Horses Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
26
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 4
Fig. 1-3: Pie ChartBruce Morton - 28 May 15
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 5
Graphic: Photo of a computer screen showing a bunch of data formatted as a table
Generic Caption: “Fig. 7: Screen Shot” Specific Caption: “Fig. 7: Program Data displayed in real time
on client’s desktop by our proven, successful, award winning PMMT (Program Management Monitoring Tool), which has been successfully implemented on multiple programs and is also proposed for use on the proposed XYZ program”
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
Generic Caption vs. Action Caption - 6
Figure 2A: “As-Is” State Figure 2B: “To-Be” StateWe plan to use the same proven Cloud Computing Environment methodology that we successfully used on the similar and highly complex XYZ Program to transform from the “As Is” to the “To Be” state
Generic Caption:
28Bruce Morton - 23 Oct.14
Figure 2: State’s Cloud Computing Environment
Action Caption:
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 29
Presenter Name
TitleOrganizationPhone Email
Thank You
Bruce Morton,APMP FellowPresident2 Oceans Consulting (703) [email protected]
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 30
Questions
Bruce Morton - 28 May 15