Govern with Confidence How to assess financial sustainability, capital expenditure and borrowing capacity for Independent Schools 29 July 2016 ASBA Tasmania State Conference Launceston 11.15am – 1.15pm As a member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand Somerset Education participates in a national liability capping scheme. Accordingly our liability is limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
87
Embed
How to assess financial sustainability, capital ...asba.asn.au/int/asba/uploads/files/Chapter Docs/TAS/2016 Tas Conf... · How to assess financial sustainability, capital expenditure
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Govern with Confidence
How to assess financial sustainability, capital expenditure
and borrowing capacity for Independent Schools
29 July 2016
ASBA Tasmania State Conference
Launceston 11.15am – 1.15pm
As a member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand Somerset Education participates in a national liability capping scheme. Accordingly our liability is limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
Govern with Confidence
John Somerset
Qualifications
Master of Business (Research) QUT – current study
Graduate Diploma Company Directors Course
Certificate IV in Workplace Training and Assessment
Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance and Investment
Professional Year Institute of Chartered Accountants
Bachelor of Commerce University of Queensland
Accreditations/Memberships
Graduate - Australian Institute of Company Directors
Fellow - Financial Services Institute of Australasia
Fellow - Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and New Zealand
Core Expertise Chartered accounting – 30 years
Accounting, taxation, business advisor
Benchmarking and financial analysis of schools (22 years).
Corporate governance of schools.
Financial viability and sustainability of schools
Budgeting ,board reporting models, on-line tools.
Appointments
Director – Independent Schools Council of Australia (2011 - )
President –Independent Schools Queensland (2011 - )
Bowman, W. (2011) Financial capacity and sustainability of ordinary nonprofits
Govern with Confidence
Queensland University Of Technology John Somerset Masters by Research 2013 - 2016
• Financial Health Assessment framework suspended• School failures have occurred• Increased interest by Federal and State• Pro-active solution required• Describe the attributes of a financially sustainable independent school in
Australia as generally accepted by major stakeholders• Interviewing major stakeholders (up to 20 interviews)
• Association of School Business Administrators together with Somerset Education
• Self Regulating initiative
• Operating over 20 years
• Generally 600+ schools (including Catholic systemic) – 73% students in Independent schools
• 60 ratios
• Compare performance with similar schools
• 2016 participation fee from $616 (incl. GST) per school
• 10 of out 10 participants recommend it
Govern with Confidence
Disclaimer
This presentation presents financial performance ratios and statistics derived from information supplied by the school as well as respondents to the Independent School’s Financial Performance Survey for the 2015 school year conducted by Somerset Education with the Association of School Business Administrators Limited.
Somerset Education conducted no hypothesis testing on the results. Therefore, if a particular result for a school is below average, Somerset Education has not carried out investigations to determine whether the school’s performance really is below average.
Neither Somerset Education nor the Association of School Business Administrators Limited accepts any responsibility, or admits liability, arising from this survey or the contents of this presentation.
As a member of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand the firm participates in a national liability capping scheme. Accordingly our liability is limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
$1,406,209/$18,485,057* = 7.6% margin* Reduced by interest subsidies of $480
Govern with Confidence
Your 2015 Net Operating Margin
• This indicates your operating surplus was $1.1 million less than other schools in the sample with similar turnover.
• National average is about 13%.
Formula: Earnings before interest and depreciation and
amortisation ÷ Gross recurrent income.
Definition: Net Operating Margin indicates your ability to
convert total gross income into a net operating result.
Table X: Operating Efficiency
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Net Operating Margin (EBIDA/Recurrent
Income)
7.6% ? 13.3% ($1,052,112)
Wages as a percentage of Income 68.7% ? 66.8%
23.4%
18.8%
14.2%
9.7%
5.1%
Govern with Confidence
Your Net Operating Margin trend
14.5%
12.1%
9.8%
7.5%
5.1%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Govern with Confidence
Your 2015 Income per student
• Your income is close to average.
• Note income sources – indicates a good sample
• Debtors and collection appear poor – indicating poor systems and possible parent dissatisfaction
Formula: Total Recurrent Income ÷ number of students.
Definition: Indicates your relative level of income
compared to other schools in the sample.
Table VI: Revenue Sources and Collection
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Revenue Sources (Excludes boarding)
Total Recurrent Income per Student $20,332
$20,068 $230,390
Discounts & Concessions as % Total Fee
Income
12.3% ? 11.8%
Fee Income as % Total Income * 55.4% 52.3%
Grant Income as % Total Income * 44.6% 45.5%
Other Income as % Total Income * 0.0% 2.3%
Fee & Other Income as % Total
Expenses
54.7% 56.9%
Outstanding Fees per Student $1,006 ? $647 $312,906
% Trade Debtors to Fees Billed 8.4% ? 4.9%
Bad Debt per Student $16
$43 ($23,078)
$23638
$21604
$19570
$17537
$15503
Govern with Confidence
Table VII: Expenditure
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average *
More/(Less)
than Average
Per Student Costs (Excludes boarding)
Teacher Salaries $9,800 ? $9,727 $63,454
Specialist Support Salaries $119
$506 ($337,466)
Teacher Aides $1,359 ? $969 $340,094
Teaching Resources $1,541 ? $1,357 $160,225
Direct Delivery Cost $12,820 ? $12,371 $391,627
Administration Salaries $1,677 ? $1,637 $34,493
Other Admin Expenses $2,374 ? $1,679 $605,443
Maintenance & Other Salaries $1,006 ? $781 $195,544
Other Maintenance Expenses $716
$1,124 ($355,850)
Total Expenditure per Student (excluding
Int, Depn, Amort & Boarding)
$18,592 ? $17,592 $871,257
As a Percentage of Expenses
Teacher Salaries 52.7%
55.9%
Specialist Support 0.6%
2.6%
Teacher Aides 7.3% ? 5.5%
Administration Salaries 9.0%
9.3%
Maintenance & Other Salaries 5.4% ? 4.4%
Teaching Resources 8.3% ? 7.6%
Other Admin Expenses 12.8% ? 9.3%
Other Maintenance Costs 3.8%
6.5%
Your 2015 Expenditure
• Your expenses are $870,000 more than the average school in the sample with identical enrolment numbers
• Major areas Administration + $600,000, Aides and Resources + $500,000• Efficient in other areas• How does this correlate to staffing?
Govern with Confidence
$25863
$22700
$19537
$16374
$13212
$11877
$10703
$9529
$8354
$7180
Your 2015 Expenditure
• Teaching expenses close to median
• Total expenses relatively high
Formula: Teacher salary (including on-costs) ÷ number of
students.
Definition: The teacher/salaries-per-student ratio provides
a benchmark of your school's teaching salary costs relative
to those of other schools in the sample.
Formula: Total Expenditure per Student (excluding Int &
Depn) ÷ number of students.
Definition: The total expenditure per student ratio
provides a benchmark of your school's expenditure per
student relative to those of other schools in the sample.
Teaching Expenses per student
Total Expenses per student
Govern with Confidence
Student/Teacher ratio
Number of students
Full-Time teacher equivalent
= Average number of students per FTE teacher
Best Practice = Depends on the school
Govern with Confidence
Your 2015 Primary Staff ratios
Formula: Number of primary students ÷ number of FTE
primary teachers
Definition: The student/teacher ratio indicates the
average number of student enrolled for each teacher
employed.
• Compared to the average school in the sample with identical primary student enrolments, you have about four more primary school staff, excluding maintenance staff.
• Note student/teacher ratio is relatively low in sample• I exclude maintenance staff because this is influenced by your choice to employ or
outsource and also the relative size of properties to be maintained.
+4.5
Table VIII: Staffing Ratios - Primary School
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Primary Student/Teacher 12.0 13.6 3.2
Primary Student/Spec Support 318.0 393.3 0.2
Primary Students/ Aides Staff 90.9 89.3 (0.1)
Primary Student/Admin Staff 60.0 78.3 1.2
Primary Student/Maint and other Staff 75.7 115.9 1.5
Primary Academic Staff to Support Staff 1.9 2.1
17.4
15.7
14
12.3
10.6
Primary student/teacher ratio
Govern with Confidence
Your 2015 Secondary Staff ratios
Formula: Number of primary students ÷ number of FTE
primary teachers
Definition: The student/teacher ratio indicates the
average number of student enrolled for each teacher
employed.
• Compared to the average school in the sample with identical secondary student enrolments, you have about sixteen more secondary school staff, excluding maintenance staff.
• Note student/teacher ratio is relatively low in sample• I exclude maintenance staff because this is influenced by your choice to employ or outsource
and also the relative size of properties to be maintained.
+16
Table IX: Staffing Ratios - Secondary School
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Secondary Student/Teacher 10.6 11.7 5.2
Secondary Student/Spec Support 277.0 212.8 (0.6)
Secondary Students/ Aides Staff 46.2 84.7 5.5
Secondary Student/Admin Staff 34.8 55.2 5.9
Secondary Student/Maint and other Staff 48.2 100.1 6.0
Secondary Academic Staff to Support Staff 1.3 1.7
Maint/Property Staff/Hectare - Prim & Sec 0.3 0.8
14.6
13.5
12.4
11.3
10.2
Secondary student/teacher ratio
Govern with Confidence
11.1
10.7
10.2
9.8
9.3
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Your Staff ratio trends
Formula: Number of primary students ÷ number of FTE
primary teachers
Definition: The student/teacher ratio indicates the
average number of student enrolled for each teacher
employed.
• Improving trend – increased students per teacher• Positive effect on Net Operating margin• Possibly more to do
Secondary student/teacher ratio
13
12.5
12
11.5
11
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Primary student/teacher ratio
Govern with Confidence
Govern with Confidence
Solvency
• School year end is December
• Lowest point for cash
• January/February cash flow significant and predictable
• Solvency ratios measured at year end can be misleading
• I prefer to see monthly budgeted cash flow
– Ensure monthly cash requirements are well within facility limits and/or
cash reserves
Govern with Confidence
Summary of Cash Flows
2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESReceipts from Fees, Grants and Other Income 18,485,537 17,603,297
Payments to Suppliers and Employees (17,111,535) (16,665,649)
Interest (483,128) (510,000)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 890,874 427,648
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESPayments (Net of Disposals) for Property, Plant and Equipment (1,500,000) (499,937)
Capital Income 190,952 190,952
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities (1,309,048) (308,985)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESLoan Repayments (446,690) (351,315)
Net Cash (Used in) / Provided By Financing Activities (446,690) (351,315)
Net (Decrease) in Cash Held (864,864) (232,652)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of the Period 1,263,797 1,496,449
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF THE PERIOD 398,933 1,263,797
SOMERSET EXAMPLE SCHOOL
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2015
Govern with Confidence
Cash Flow Adequacy Ratio
Net Cash Generated from operations
Cash paid for asset purchases and debt servicing
= For every dollar spent on asset purchases and debt servicing (your primary use of cash in a school), how much was funded from operations.
Rule of thumb = 1 or better over the medium term
eg. Earn a dollar and spend a dollar
Govern with Confidence
Your Cash Flow Adequacy
Somerset Example School 2015 2014
Estimated cash from operations
Operating profit/(loss) -$385,489 -$899,892
Add depreciation 1,500,001$ 1,500,002$
1,114,512$ 600,110$
Asset purchases 1,500,000$ 499,937$
Debt payments including interest
Debt principal repayments 446,690$ 351,315$
Interest 483,128$ 510,000$
929,818$ 861,315$
Estimated cash from operations 1,114,512$ 600,110$
Add interest expnse 483,128$ 510,000$
Adjusted Cash from operations 1,597,640$ 1,110,110$
Asset purchases 1,500,000$ 499,937$
Debt servicing 929,818$ 861,315$
2,429,818$ 1,361,252$
Cash flow Adequacy 0.66 0.82
• More interested in the trend of this ratio
• If consistently < 1.0, how is that being funded?
Govern with Confidence
Working Capital Ratio
= Current assets
Current liabilities
= For every dollar of debt due in the next 12 months (denominator), how much cash (numerator) was available?
Rule of thumb = at least 1 times
Govern with Confidence
Your Working Capital Ratio
• More interested in the trend of this ratio and if it is > 1.0• Indicates poor and deteriorating ability to pay debts as and when
due
Table II: Liquidity Ratios
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Working Capital * 0.66 ? 0.95
Somerset Example School 2015 2014
Working Capital Ratio
Current Assets 1,574,808$ 2,406,985$
Current Liabilities 3,797,720$ 3,647,726$
Working Capital 0.41 0.66
Govern with Confidence
Govern with Confidence
Depreciation Impact
Depreciation expenditure
Net cash from operations
Indicates % of the operating surplus to be directed to asset replacement.
Govern with Confidence
Reinvestment ratio
Capital expenditure
Net cash from operations
Indicates % of operating surplus actually reinvested into asset replacement.
Govern with Confidence
Your Depreciation and Reinvestment as % Cash Flow
37
%
37
8%
62
% 11
4% 21
6%
25
0%
13
5%
82
%
81
9%
80
%
84
%
75
%
83
% 13
5%
0.0%
200.0%
400.0%
600.0%
800.0%
1000.0%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Somerset Example School
Depreciation Reinvestment
• More interested in the trend in this school’s individual ratio rather than sample averages
• Under invested 2012, 2013, 2014
• Matched depreciation in 2015, but funded from cash reserves
• Not sustainable because depreciation > cash surplus indicating assets are wearing out faster than the school is able to replace them
• Declining profitability is underlying cause
Govern with Confidence
Debt per student
Interest bearing (bank) debt
Student numbers
Sample Average about $8,800 (2015 school year)
Govern with Confidence
Your 2015 Debt Ratios
• Debt is close to average
• Close to the centre point (median)
Formula: Total debt ÷ student numbers.
Definition: A measure of your debt relative to others in
the sample.
Table V: Capital Structure and Debt Protection
Ratio Your
School
Rating Sample Average More/(Less)
than Average
Interest Cover * 2.9 ? 14.7
Debt Servicing Cover * 1.5
10.9
Liabilities to Equity 41.0% 33.2%
Debt Repayment (Years) 6.8 ? 3.9
Debt per Student $8,720
$8,836 ($100,483)
Debt Repayment to Total Income 5.1% 4.6%
$22265
$16699
$11132
$5566
$0
Debt per student
Govern with Confidence
Interest Cover
Earnings before interest, depreciation & amortisation
Interest expense
= Number of times the school can meet its interest expense
Rule of thumb 2 to 3 times (refer to you bank’s policies)
Generally banks require a 2 times interest cover or higher.
I prefer 3 times or higher
Govern with Confidence
Debt Servicing Cover
Earnings before interest, depreciation, amortisation
Interest expense + Principal repayments
= Number of times the school can meet its principal and interest payments
Rule of thumb > 1.5 times
Govern with Confidence
Your Debt Servicing
• Inadequate debt serviceability in 2014 due to low profitability
• Improved in 2015
• But consider ability to sustainably meet debt servicing and asset replacement?
Somerset Example School 2015 2014
EBIDA 1,406,208$ 918,678$
Interest Expense 483,128$ 510,000$
Debt principal repayments 446,690$ 351,315$
929,818$ 861,315$
Interest Cover 2.9 1.8
Debt Servicing Cover 1.5 1.1
Govern with Confidence
Rough Estimate of Borrowing Capacity
• EBIDA 2015 = $1,400,000
• Target Interest cover = 3 times
• Target maximum interest expense = $460,000
• Assume interest rate = 6% P.A.
• Corresponding loan = $7.6 million
• Proof $7.6 million at 6% = $460,000 interest expense
• Starting point only
• Need to consider debt servicing cover and ability to replace assets
Govern with Confidence
Summary Indications
• Enrolments trended down but improved in 2015• 2015 operating surplus $870,000 less than average• Income higher than average• Discounts OK• Poor fee collection. Is there discontent in the school community?• 2015 expenses $1.1 million higher than average
– In particular administration, aides and resources
• Over 20 more staff than average• Cash reserves declining and likely to run out in 2016• Question solvency• Assets wearing out faster than ability to replace• Debt about average• Ability to service debt improved in 2015• But not sufficient cash left to also replace assets• Question sustainability of this school