How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Journals
Summary Edition
Comparing the changing user behaviour between 2005 and 2012 and its impact on
publisher web site design and function.
By Tracy Gardner and Simon Inger
Published by Renew Training
Copyright © Renew Training, Tracy Gardner and Simon Inger
ISBN 978-0-9573920-3-8
Renew Training
Fernhill, Church Lane, Drayton
Abingdon, United Kingdom
The full version of this report (123 pages and 90 figures) is available in Kindle (for
Kindle, iPad, PC and Mac) and PDF formats, the entire survey results data set upon
which this report is based, and the analytical framework are available for purchase at
www.renewtraining.com/publications.htm
Summary Edition Page 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would have not been possible without the support of the following
organisations, who between them executed hundreds of thousands of
invitations to journal readers asking them to participate in this survey. Our
heartfelt thanks go out to them all.
BMJ Group
CABI
Cambridge University Press
IOP Publishing
Nature Publishing Group
Palgrave Macmillan
Publishing Technology
RSC Publishing
SAGE
Summary Edition Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1
Table of Contents 2
Introduction 3
Methodology 4
Demographics 5
Discovery Resource Preference 8
Discovery Resource Conclusions 16
The Role of the Library 18
Search Engine Preference 20
Device Preference 21
App Use 22
Publisher Web Site Features 23
Conclusions 24
About the Authors 25
Summary Edition Page 3
INTRODUCTION This summary report is the output of a large scale survey of journal readers
(n=19064) about journal content discovery conducted during May, June and
July of 2102. While statistics and analytics can tell us some of this
information, there are many gaps in the knowledge that these can provide
which we have endeavoured to fill by asking readers what how they discover
journal content.
Summary Edition Page 4
METHODOLOGY This research carries on from, and expands upon, previous research
undertaken in 2005 and 2008 (also by Simon Inger and Tracy Gardner) and
attempts to follow the trends in behaviour over that period of time.
Naturally, each time the survey is repeated, the authors have sought to
keep the questions as consistent as possible with the questions in earlier
surveys whilst keeping terminology current and tracking new developments.
For this reason the three key questions on reader behaviour were modified a
little, some options being reclassified and additional options created.
However, since those questions don’t limit how many starting points the
reader acknowledges as being important, this approach should have minimal
impact on the results for any option present in the survey all the way from
2005 to 2012. Other questions were dropped completely, since the
conclusions from these in 2008 are now so widely accepted as fact (and
easily checked with analytics) that these were not tested. These included
asking readers where links from discovery products would take them in
publisher web sites, the answer being predominantly at the article level.
The full methodology is available in the full report available at:
www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-discover-content-in-scholarly-
journals.htm
Summary
DEMO
Edition
OGRAPH
Figure 1
As shown
regional s
country)
hence reg
Figure 2
9406 peowho indic
HICS
n in Figure
spread and
breakdow
gion).
ople came cated a cou
1, the res
d this allow
ns, see be
from the tuntry.
spondents
ws for sign
elow. 1330
top 15 cou
s to the su
nificant re
08 people
untries sho
rvey come
gional (an
told us th
own above
Page
e from an
nd in some
eir countr
e, i.e. 71%
5
excellent
e cases
y (and
% of those
e
Summary Edition
Figure 3
The secto
Charity/N
so on. 18
Figure 4
The numb
to be mad
marketing
researche
demograp
income. 1
or-breakdo
NGO to allo
8958 peop
bers of res
de for all r
g/PR/sales
er, lecture
phic analy
17403 peo
own is also
ow for furt
le told us
spondents
roles save
s roles. Th
r and stud
ysis within
ople told u
o very goo
ther break
which sec
s by job ro
for, perha
here are su
dent categ
these gro
s their job
od, with su
kdowns by
tor they w
le allows f
aps, journ
ufficient re
gories to a
oups, inclu
b role.
ufficient nu
subject, r
worked in.
for meanin
alists and
esponses w
llow for co
ding by su
Page 6
umbers in
region, inc
ngful comp
within aca
onsiderable
ubject, reg
6
all but
come and
parisons
demic
e further
gion and
Summary Edition
Figure 5
When em
in each su
possible w
the subje
which stil
Earth Scie
represent
individua
if not whe
mbarking o
ubject are
within sub
ect areas, a
l allows fo
ence, Env
ted in the
ls in these
en combin
n this proj
ea, so that
ject with m
and three
or some us
ironmenta
data, alth
e areas to
ned with a
ject, our a
detailed d
minimal e
more sub
seful furth
al Science
ough in ab
allow for a
further de
aim was to
demograp
rror-bars.
bject areas
er sub-div
and Mathe
bsolute te
a useful su
emograph
o get aroun
hic analys
This was
s got aroun
vision. Com
ematics ar
rms there
ubject-bas
ic.
Page 7
nd 1000 r
sis would b
achieved
nd 600 res
mputer Sc
re the leas
e are enou
sed analys
7
esponses
be
for six of
sponses,
cience,
st well-
gh
sis, even
Summary Edition Page 8
DISCOVERY RESOURCE PREFERENCE In designing a journal’s online presence, a publisher needs to gain an
understanding of how readers will navigate to the journal and at what part
of the journal web site they will arrive. This will help inform decisions on
which partners to work with, how to distribute essential data to them, and
how to design web pages within a journal web site that meet the needs of
readers wherever they arrive within the site.
This research focuses on three main forms of reader behaviour with respect
to journals; citation searching, core journal browsing, and subject searching.
Given these different approaches to the literature, researchers select their
most appropriate starting points on the internet (described extensively in
the full edition of this report at www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-
discover-content-in-scholarly-journals.htm) and navigate to journal content.
The combination of where readers want to perform certain functions (such
as search) and on which pages within a journal web site that the reader
“lands” as a consequence of their navigational behaviour sheds light on the
design and feature-set of a journal’s web presence. It also helps inform
publishers as to which kinds of starting points they should seek to enable
first, for the greatest possible return in reader traffic.
For each type of behaviour this research tested, the survey asked about a
number of different starting points. An explanation of these starting points is
included in the full report. See www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-
discover-content-in-scholarly-journals.htm
CITATION SEARCHING
In this question we asked people to state the importance to them of each
starting point when following up on a citation.
Summary Edition
Figure 6
We chose
Terminolo
between
pages has
since 200
the use o
Academic
surveys o
sampled
the same
This samp
The full re
shows de
job role a
content-in
e not to co
ogy in the
what were
s blurred c
08. In addi
of the likes
c Search. T
of 2005 an
using a ra
e size as th
ple is bias
eport show
emographic
and sector
n-scholarly
ontinue wit
sector ha
e consider
considerab
ition, for t
s of Google
To make a
nd 2008 an
ndom sele
he 2008 st
ed toward
ws the res
c breakdo
r. See www
y-journals
th some o
as moved o
red to be “
bly. Comm
the first tim
e from Goo
a sensible
nd this one
ection met
tudy and w
ds Life Scie
sults for al
wns by re
w.renewtra
s.htm
f the optio
on and mo
“journals g
munity web
me, this ye
ogle Scho
compariso
e, the 201
thod to giv
with the sa
entists in N
ll responde
gion, inco
aining.com
ons from t
oreover th
gateways”
b sites hav
ear’s surve
lar, Bing f
on betwee
12 data ha
ve a samp
ame subje
North Ame
ents to the
me bracke
m/how-rea
Page 9
the earlier
e boundar
and librar
ve come o
ey separa
from Micro
en the muc
as been do
ple of appr
ect mix as
erica and E
e 2012 sur
et, subject
aders-disco
9
surveys.
ries
ry web
online
tes out
osoft
ch smaller
own-
roximately
before.
Europe.
rvey and
t area,
over-
r
y
Summary Edition Page 10
For this sample of respondents, we see that use of a specialist bibliographic
database continues to climb. Given the comments made in the survey it is
not surprising – so many life scientists commented that they use PubMed
almost exclusively. As in previous years the survey shows that readers faced
with a citation seem to know their subject areas well enough to go directly
to the web site of the journal to follow up on the citation, whilst the use of
library web pages in this regard is in steady decline over the period. Web
pages managed by a key research group have increased since 2008. Given
the margin for error, there is no significant difference in respondents using
the publisher’s website or the journal’s homepage to look up a citation. More
respondents are using a Scholarly Society web page to look up article
citations than in 2005 and 2008. Another feature of this year’s results is that
readers of online journals seem to have become much savvier about their
information discovery. Some of the options that seemed oddly popular to us
in the past, such as using an archive of ToC alerts to follow up on a citation,
have declined in popularity in 2012. Academic search engines such as
Google Scholar are more popular than general web search engines and are
the second most popular source for looking up a citation, after the
bibliographic databases.
CORE JOURNAL BROWSING
The second behaviour studied is the user who regularly reviews a few select
journals that he considers worth scanning upon publication.
In this question we asked people to state the importance to them of each
starting point when reading their core content.
Summary Edition
Figure 7
This chart
latest art
resource
homepag
perhaps i
publisher
grown, in
Showing
second m
The full re
shows de
job role a
content-in
t shows th
icles in the
for this ty
es and sch
ndicating
brands. W
ndicating p
a significa
most popul
eport show
emographic
and sector
n-scholarly
he trend in
eir subject
ype of beha
holarly So
that reade
Web pages
perhaps th
ant downw
ar resourc
ws the res
c breakdo
r. See www
y-journals
n behaviou
t area. A&
aviour. A
ociety web
ers are be
s managed
e growing
ward trend
ce for disco
sults for al
wns by re
w.renewtra
s.htm
ur for read
&I database
publisher’s
pages hav
coming m
d by a key
g success o
is journal
overing la
ll responde
gion, inco
aining.com
ders who w
es continu
s web site
ve all grow
ore familia
y research
of some of
alerts, ho
test article
ents to the
me bracke
m/how-rea
Page 1
wish to dis
ue to grow
e, journal
wn in popu
ar with jou
group has
f these res
owever it i
es.
e 2012 sur
et, subject
aders-disco
1
scover the
w as a
ularity,
urnal and
s also
sources.
s still the
rvey and
t area,
over-
Summary Edition
SUBJECT
The third
articles o
subject se
seeking t
literature
In this qu
starting p
Figure 8
This ques
articles o
two types
the latest
popular r
shows no
SEARCHIN
form of u
n a specifi
earch prio
o check, p
.
uestion we
point when
stion asked
n a subjec
s of behav
t articles. S
esource fo
o significan
NG
ser behav
ic subject.
r to under
prior to pu
e asked pe
n reading t
d responde
ct. The gra
viour we as
Specialist
or this type
nt change
viour studi
. A user is
rtaking res
blication,
eople to sta
their core
ents abou
aph shows
sked abou
bibliograp
e of activi
over time
ed occurs
likely to u
search in a
the precis
ate the im
content.
t their beh
s quite diff
ut – follow
phic datab
ty and allo
. Library w
when a us
undertake
a specific f
se state of
mportance
haviour wh
ferent resp
ing a citat
ases (A&Is
owing for a
web pages
Page 12
ser is sear
a compre
field or wh
f the curre
to them o
hen search
ponses to
tion and vi
s) are still
a margin o
s however
2
rching for
ehensive
hen
ent
of each
hing for
the other
iewing
l the most
of error,
have
t
Summary Edition Page 13
grown significantly in popularity, possibly due to the introduction of web
scale discovery services. At the same time general web search engines have
shown a slight downward trend, possibly because the additional alternative
option of an academic search engine was added to the options in the survey.
Web pages managed by a key research group and society web pages have
both shown a slight upward trend which may be due to changes in publisher
marketing strategies resulting in readers becoming more familiar with
publisher and society brands. In absolute terms, searching within a journal
aggregation is quite significant, as are publisher web sites and journal
homepages, the latter of which has shown a significant change since 2005.
As in previous years, all of these methods have a value to someone but the
most popular method in this comparison is Abstract and Indexing databases.
The full report shows the results for all respondents to the 2012 survey and
shows demographic breakdowns by region, income bracket, subject area,
job role and sector. In addition it shows the correlation in search behaviour
between subjects. See www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-discover-
content-in-scholarly-journals.htm
Summary Edition
SUBJECT
Figure 9
Library w
Research
Agricultur
many oth
The full re
communi
discover-
MOST REC
With the
a useful c
accessed
about the
which mo
AREA BRE
web pages
and Hum
re. Respon
her subject
eport cont
ity web sit
content-in
CENT ARTI
luxury of s
check to a
. This is us
e relative i
odes of use
EAKDOWN
are of mo
anities fol
ndents in P
t areas by
tains furth
tes, and m
n-scholarly
ICLE ACCES
such a larg
sk how re
seful since
mportance
e they are
S IN SEAR
ost importa
lowed by
Physics va
y quite a si
her breakd
more. See w
y-journals.
SSED
ge numbe
aders disc
e in part it
e of variou
e more com
RCH
ance to pe
Social and
alued libra
ignificant
downs inclu
www.rene
.htm
er of respo
covered th
t can valid
us starting
mmonly in
eople work
d Political S
ry web pa
margin.
uding aggr
wtraining.
nses to th
e very las
ate their p
g points, b
. It is comPage 14
king in Edu
Science an
ages a lot l
regators, A
.com/how
he survey,
st article th
previous a
but also in
mmon to im4
ucation
nd
less than
A&Is,
-readers-
it is also
hat they
nswers
dicates
magine
Summary Edition
that most
following-
Figure 10
This grap
America,
likely to b
to be doin
in emails
from Nort
behaviou
majority
when the
used, as
journal bo
researche
The full re
subject a
discover-
t people a
-up-on-a-c
0
ph compare
Europe an
be searchi
ng so than
are also m
th America
r of acade
of researc
y last acce
are article
ookmarks
ers in any
eport show
rea, job ro
content-in
re in searc
citation m
es behavio
nd Asia an
ng for arti
n their Eur
more frequ
a and Euro
emic resea
chers in bo
essed an a
e citations
and saved
of these t
ws demog
ole and se
n-scholarly
ch mode m
ode.
our from A
nd shows t
icles than
ropean and
uently use
ope. There
rchers in
oth regions
article. Ho
from othe
d search a
three regio
raphic bre
ector. See
y-journals.
more than
Academic
that Asian
anything e
d North Am
ed by Asian
e is no not
Europe an
s say they
owever, jou
er sources
alerts are n
ons.
eakdowns
www.rene
.htm
in browse
Researche
researche
else, and
merican co
n research
table differ
d North A
y were sea
urnal alert
. Social ne
not used f
by region,
ewtraining
Page 1
e mode, or
ers in Nort
ers are mu
much mor
ounterpart
hers than t
rence in th
America. T
arching for
ts are also
etworking
frequently
, income b
g.com/how
5
r in
th
uch more
re likely
ts. Links
those
he
he
r articles
o well
links,
by
bracket,
w-readers-
Summary Edition Page 16
DISCOVERY RESOURCE CONCLUSIONS ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING SERVICES (SPECIALIST BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASES)
A&Is are seen to be the most important starting point for many subject
areas across many sectors in search, and also an increasingly common way
of following up on a known citation. The trend since 2005 is positive in all
three modes of use studied, although some subject areas are much better
served than others.
LIBRARY WEB PAGES (PREVIOUSLY LIBRARY OPAC)
Investment in library technology seems to be having a positive impact on
the use of library web pages in search, while as a means of viewing the most
recent articles in a subject niche, popularity remains flat. Readers seem to
be turning away from these resources as a means of following up on a
citation.
A JOURNAL COLLECTION, OR AGGREGATION (NEW IN THIS SURVEY)
Journal aggregations overall are important, but not as important as many
other discovery methods, until one starts to look into some subject
disciplines and other demographics where they are more popular.
A COMMUNITY WEB SITE (NEW IN THIS SURVEY)
Across the board, community web sites such as Mendeley and Researchgate
are used much less than other starting points for all three behaviours. This
could be because they are relatively new and have yet to build up the brand
recognition and penetration needed to compete with some of the other
resources.
WEB PAGES MANAGED BY A KEY RESEARCH GROUP
Key research groups are also used less than other starting points, although
they are more important than community web sites. This could be because
they generally appeal to smaller subject niches so when we look at the
results more broadly, they are relatively unimportant. However, when
looking at the trend graphs, they have grown in importance for all three
types of behaviours studied.
Summary Edition Page 17
A PUBLISHER’S WEB SITE
A publisher’s web site has become more important for looking at latest
articles in core journals over time. For the other two types of behaviours
their importance has remained static.
EMAIL BASED ALERTS
For all three types of behaviour, email based alerts have decreased in
popularity since 2005. However, when looking at them in comparison to
other resources in absolute terms they are still important for looking at the
latest issues of core journals.
THE JOURNAL’S HOMEPAGE
The journal’s homepage has remained important for looking up a citation;
this hasn’t changed over time and is as important as an academic search
engine, and more important than a general search engine. It has slightly
grown in popularity for discovering latest articles and searching.
GENERAL WEB SEARCH ENGINES
General web search engines have grown very slightly in popularity for
people looking up a citation, grown slightly more for people discovering
latest articles but decreased in popularity for people searching. This could be
because search engines have been separated out this year to general and
academic.
ACADEMIC SEARCH ENGINES (NEW FOR THIS SURVEY)
When following a citation, academic search engines are the second most
popular resource across the board. They are less important for people who
want to discover latest articles; they are more likely to use the journal home
page, journal alerts, a publisher’s web site or an A&I. When searching, an
academic search engine is the second most popular resource.
SOCIETY WEB PAGES
Whilst still not as important as many of the resources listed, society web
pages have grown in importance in all three behaviours studied.
Summary
THE R
Edition
ROLE O
Over the
and mone
have bee
pages, jo
link-serve
available
responsib
while oth
In additio
survey as
and the f
Figure 11
F THE
past fiftee
ey in the m
n focussed
urnal A to
ers and no
from libra
ble for the
ers are mo
on to unde
sked reade
indings ar
1
LIBRAR
en years, l
manageme
d on the d
o Z listings
ow web sca
ary techno
earliest li
ore recent
erstanding
ers about t
e shown b
RY libraries h
ent of e-re
developme
s, improve
ale discov
ology vend
brary auto
t innovato
library we
the influen
below.
ave been
esources, a
ent and im
ments to
ery produ
ors – ofte
omation pr
rs in the a
eb pages a
nce of libra
expending
and much
plementat
library cat
cts. These
n the sam
rojects of
area.
as a starti
ary techno
Page 18
g ever mo
of these e
tion of libr
talogues, l
e web site
me organis
30-40 yea
ng point, t
ology on n
8
re time
efforts
rary web
library
tools are
ations
ars ago,
the
navigation
Summary Edition Page 19
This plot shows the sum of those who said library technology affected
navigation more than 50% of the time in each category, for the 15 countries
providing the highest aggregate response to the survey. Readers in Malaysia
are highly aware of library technology, much more so than any other
country, with the possible exception of Australia. Awareness in Canada, US
and Australia is more on a par. There is an indicative result that awareness
is lowest in Germany, Japan and China which either indicates that take up in
these regions is low or it is so unobtrusive, readers are not aware of how the
library affects discovery. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, awareness in Iran
is relatively high which supports the view that the Middle East is becoming
an important market for library technology.
The full report shows further demographic breakdowns. See
www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-discover-content-in-scholarly-
journals.htm
Summary
SEARC
Edition
CH ENG
Figure 12
Informati
researche
note perh
Scirus tha
more tha
Google m
A&I datab
negating
The full re
subject a
discover-
GINE P
2
on manag
ers. Presum
haps, is th
an student
n Google,
more than G
bases and
some of t
eport show
rea, job ro
content-in
REFERE
gers use G
mably this
at Informa
ts and res
and perha
Google Sc
will use s
he need fo
ws demog
ole and se
n-scholarly
ENCE
Google sea
s is due to
ation Mana
searchers.
aps surpri
cholar - ma
search eng
or Google
raphic bre
ector. See
y-journals.
rch engine
their use
agers mak
Students
singly aca
aybe beca
gines for a
Scholar.
eakdowns
www.rene
.htm
es less tha
of more s
ke margina
use Goog
demic res
use they a
more gen
by region,
ewtraining
Page 20
an student
specialist t
ally more
le Scholar
searchers u
are higher
neral searc
, income b
g.com/how
0
ts and
tools. Of
use of
r slightly
use
r users of
ch,
bracket,
w-readers-
Summary
DEVIC
Edition
CE PRE
Figure 13
The Acad
medical,
governme
and phon
The gove
of laptops
the least
The full re
www.rene
journals.h
FERENC
3
emic secto
charity an
ent sector
nes to acce
rnment se
s is on a p
use of des
eport show
ewtraining
htm
CE
or uses mo
d corpora
. There is
ess online
ector make
par with ac
sktops for
ws further
g.com/how
obile phon
te sectors
an indicat
journal ar
es the mo
cademics.
this purpo
r demograp
w-readers-
nes for jou
s, and a sim
tive result
rticles is th
st use of s
Charity an
ose.
phic break
-discover-c
urnal acces
milar amo
that the g
he medica
static devi
nd Corpora
kdowns. S
content-in
Page 2
ss less tha
ount to the
group usin
l sector.
ces and th
ate sector
See
n-scholarly
1
an the
e
ng tablets
heir use
rs make
y-
Summary
APP U
Edition
USE
Figure 14
In compa
that the c
their acad
them for
As an ind
apps in a
absolute
The full re
the intere
www.rene
journals.h
4
aring resea
corporate
demic cou
accessing
icative res
ccessing j
terms, Ap
eport show
esting com
ewtraining
htm
archers in
researche
nterparts,
journals v
sult, inform
ournals, e
p use is q
ws further
mments ma
g.com/how
academic
ers are bet
, but appa
via apps.
mation ma
especially i
uite low.
r demograp
ade on thi
w-readers-
and corpo
tter equipp
rently don
anagers m
in browsin
phic break
is topic. Se
-discover-c
orate envi
ped with s
n’t make a
ay be mak
g. The res
kdowns an
ee
content-in
Page 22
ronments,
martphon
any more u
king more
sults show
nd reveals
n-scholarly
2
, we find
es than
use of
e use of
w that, in
many of
y-
Summary
PUBLI
Edition
SHER WIn the su
selected l
features a
compariso
as faceted
Figure 15
A sample
region an
set comp
over time
indeed pa
WEB Srvey, resp
list of feat
are the sa
on, and do
d browse/
5
of the 20
nd subject
ared with
e but cann
an-subject
SITE FE
pondents w
tures of pu
me as tho
o not spec
search.
12 data w
area seen
the 2005
ot be take
t area basi
EATURE
were invite
ublisher we
ose tested
cifically tes
was taken a
n in the 20
and 2008
en as an in
is.
ES ed to indic
eb sites, t
in 2005 a
st some m
at random
008 resear
results. T
ndication o
ate which
hey found
nd 2008 t
more mode
m in the bro
rch and the
This can sh
of behavio
Page 23
features,
d useful. T
to allow fo
ern inventi
oad propo
e results f
how us the
our on a gl
3
of a
hese
or direct
ons, such
ortions of
for this
e trends
obal or
Summary Edition Page 24
CONCLUSIONS It is widely acknowledged that readers arrive on publisher web sites from a
discovery resource at the article level, and for a few years now publishers
have been building web sites that expose vital functionality to the reader on
that landing page. However, search on the publisher web site is persistently
popular, not just on external discovery platforms, and indeed the number of
readers who bookmark key pages in publisher web sites, or simply
remember them, shows that publishers need to keep a multitude of
navigational paths open to their readers. Moreover, this research shows that
the relative importance of all of these paths vary from subject to subject,
from region to region, and by job function. Multidisciplinary publishers need
to take special note of keeping an open mind to reader navigation while
perhaps more specialist ones could take a more decisive approach.
A key measure of publisher success is the usage of its e-journals, which can
be maximised by influencing and enabling all the routes to its content.
Library technology plays a key role in user navigation, as well as the more
apparent starting points such as Google or major subject A&I databases.
Publishers need to support all conceivable routes to their content through
the web. This can best be achieved through the distribution of XML header
information to as many discovery platforms as possible, through RSS feeds,
collaboration with CrossRef, library technology vendors and through working
with major gateways, A&Is and search engines.
As metadata distribution is maximised and users are able to choose more
freely their preferred routes to content, many of the advanced features that
users require seem to be migrating to their chosen discovery platforms
leaving the publisher site ever more as a content silo, without the need for
quite so many of the advanced features that are currently present there.
However, publishers remain under pressure to maintain a high level of
functionality to ensure that they engage with content buyers, authors and
editorial boards.
Summary Edition Page 25
ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simon Inger has worked in the journals industry for over twenty-five
years. In this time, he has worked for Blackwell, CatchWord, Ingenta and,
since 2002, as an independent consultant. Simon was Founder and
Managing Director of CatchWord Ltd, the world’s largest e-journal platform
of the time, from its inception in 1995 to its sale to Ingenta in 2001. Simon
has worked extensively in journal sales, marketing and pricing; e-journal
delivery and platform selection; fulfilment and editorial systems selection;
business reviews; management; financial planning; product development;
market research; content development; and library technology. In addition,
he runs training courses for librarians in the UK and Ireland on e-journal
technology and management, as well as courses for publishers on best
practice in e-journal dissemination. Simon’s clients include societies,
university presses and commercial publishers from across Europe and North
America.
Tracy Gardner has over fifteen years’ experience in marketing and
communications. She has a very broad view of the industry having worked
for publishing technology companies (CatchWord and Ingenta), a not-for-
profit publisher (CABI Publishing) and a consultancy company (Scholarly
Information Strategies) where she worked on various projects for
publishers, intermediaries and libraries. Throughout her career she has been
focussed on improving the communication channels between publishers,
intermediaries and librarians and understands the business of scholarly
publishing from many different perspectives. She now has her own company
and offers consultancy and training services to those involved in the
scholarly publishing industry. Tracy has been a co-trainer on UKSG’s E-
Resources Technical Update course since the beginning of 2007.
For the full report see www.renewtraining.com/how-readers-
discover-content-in-scholarly-journals.htm