Top Banner
How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske
16

How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Avice Dawson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

How Post-Flashing Can ImproveCTE in Some UVIS images

Jay AndersonJohn MacKentySylvia Baggett

Kai Noeske

Page 2: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Background on CTE

• Understanding evolving, improving– Photometric corrections– Pixel-based corrections– Corrections never perfect

• Better…– Minimize losses in first place

• Place source close to amplifier• Maximize signal (fewer exposures)• Avoid low backgrounds• UVIS charge-injection• Post-flash options

Page 3: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

CTE TRAILS:

ACS-vs-UVIS(May 2012)

WP

0 1 2 3 4 5

Page 4: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

WP LOSSESDOWNCHIP:ACSUVIS

The magic ofshort-long

dark studies…

1000s

100s

−5%

−75%

Page 5: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Finer-scale

CTE-losstrends

Page 6: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Finer-scale

CTE-losstrends Flat?

monotonic

Line

ar g

row

th N

trap

s α

Nq

Line

ar g

row

th N

trap

s α

Nq

Page 7: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Way to think about it…

12 in trail

18 total

6 in head

✕ Transfer out of board

Number of traps encountered isproportional to

the cross-sectionarea

Want to spread out

Prefer to squeeze rather than go up

Prefer to go up and squeeze more

Page 8: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Way to think about it…

18 totalAbove bkgd

6 in bkgd

12 in trail

18 total

6 in head

Page 9: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

New ObservationsOmega Cen center, from SM4-calibration --- F336W

Two Kinds of Obsns

1) 10s + 700s at same pointing with var bkgd

2) three 9pt dither stacks: (a) 700s deep (b) 10s (no bkgd) (c) 10s (12 e- bkgd)

Page 10: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

DeepStack (700s)

A: 22 electrons above skyB: 28 electrons above skyC: 65 electrons above skyD: 13 electrons above sky

Page 11: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Short UnflashedStack (10s)

Page 12: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Short Post-FlashedStack (10s)

Page 13: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

DeepStack (700s)

A: 22 electrons above skyB: 28 electrons above skyC: 65 electrons above skyD: 13 electrons above sky

Page 14: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Trends from ~5×5-pixel Aperture

Photometry on ×2-Sampled Stacks

Page 15: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Losses as a Function of

Background:

Survival of a 100 e- source at top of chip

= sweet spot!

Page 16: How Post-Flashing Can Improve CTE in Some UVIS images Jay Anderson John MacKenty Sylvia Baggett Kai Noeske.

Next steps…• UVIS

– Help users re-plan Phase-II’s to hit sweet spot– Use observations to calibrate losses-vs-bkgd– Constrain model better

• Take more long/short darks-vs-background

• ACS– Following in UVIS’s footsteps– No sweet spot: compromise

• Add noise, preserve signal• More complicated analysis for us and users

– Post-flash issues:• 50% variation across field• 25% dependence on shutter (A or B)