How Poor Indoor Environmental Quality Affects Performance in Work Environments and Educational Buildings Pawel Wargocki [email protected]International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy Department of Civil Engineering Technical University of Denmark
64
Embed
How Poor Indoor Environmental Quality Affects Performance in …kgh-kongres.rs/images/2019/prezentacije/99_Pawel... · 2020. 6. 18. · Interruptions to work, observed downtime. ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Based on a typical split of business operating costs:
modest gains in staff health and wellbeing can deliver significant financial savings
ENERGY &NON-ENERGY BENEFITS
ARE LOW HANGING FRUITS…
Source: curtbeavers.com
Source: ASHRAE Journal. 2013;55(3):46-52.
Building design and operation
Benefits Value of the benefit
Indoor Climate (IEQ)
Human responses
IEQ & HUMAN PERFORMANCE ABILITY TO PERFORM WORK
Source: Seppanen et al. (2005)
POTENTIAL MECHANISMS
IEQ
MOTIVATION
AROUSAL
SLEEP QUALITY
DISTRACTION & ATTENTION
NEUROBEHAVIORAL SYMPTOMS
ACUTE HEALTH SYMPTOMS
COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE
ABSENTEEISM
Source: Wargocki and Wyon (2017)
YERKES-DODSON LAW
Source: Yerkes and Dodson (1908)
ACUTE HEALTH SYMPTOMS AND PERFORMANCE
0.0023
0.0024
0.0025
0.0026
0.0027
0.0028
Office employees
Res
po
nse
tim
e-1
(1/
ms)
Continuous performance task
7.2% lower workrate (P<0.001)
Any SBS symptoms No SBS symptoms
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
Office employees
Err
or
rate
(%
)
Symbol-digit substitution task
30% higher error rate (P=0.07)
Any SBS symptoms No SBS symptoms
Source: Nunes et al. (1993)
SATISFACTION w/IEQ IMPORTANT FOR self-estimated PERFORMANCE
◼ Satisfaction with temperature, noise level and air quality = satisfaction with IEQ
◼ For example, ~15% increase in satisfaction with temperature would increase self-estimated job performance by ~1%
Importance for self-estimated performance
(regression coefficient)
Satisfaction with…
Source: Wargocki et al. (2012)
BUILDING FEATURES ARE IMPORTANT FOR SATISFACTION
◼ All important (p<0.05)
◼ The most important is satisfaction with amount of space the most important regardless occupants’ gender and age, type of office (single office, shared office, cubicles) and distance from a window
◼ Other important parameters include satisfaction with, noise level, visual privacy, colors and textures, etc.
◼ IEQ is not the most important
Importance for satisfaction/comfort
(odds ratio) Source: Frontczak et al. (2011)
EVIDENCE: OFFICE WORK
Elevated temperatures and poor air quality can affect performance of office work by 5% (laboratory) to 10%
(field)
Outdoor air supply rate (L/s per person)
Perf
orm
ance
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
1.01
1.00
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
VENTILATION AND PERFORMANCE OF OFFICE WORK
Source: Wargocki and Seppanen (2006)
Reduction in p
erf
orm
ance
Thermal sensation vote
Source: Lan et al. (2011)
THERMAL DISCOMFORT AND PERFORMANCE OF OFFICE WORK
EVIDENCE: SCHOOLWORK
Elevated temperatures and poor air quality can affect performance of schoolwork by children by over 15-20%
(field)
VENTILATION AND PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLWORK
Source: Wargocki et al. (in the Press)
VENTILATION AND PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLWORK
Source: Wargocki et al. (in the Press)
TEMPERATURE AND PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLWORK
Source: Wargocki et al. (2019)
EVIDENCE: ABSENCE RATES
Poor IEQ increases the short term sick-leave by few
days, usually by 1-2 days
(SOME) UNSOLVED MATTERS AND CHALLENGES◼ Which pollutants can be associated with the
effects on performance?
◼ Are there any risks for performance associated with the use of adaptive thermal comfort model?
◼ Do green buildings promote performance?
◼ How can performance be reliably measured?
◼ Can the evidence on the effects of IEQ on performance be used in economic calculations?
◼ What is the combined effect of several IEQ parameters on performance?
◼ To which extent is performance affected by sleep quality that is affected by IEQ?
◼ Financial: absenteeism, staff retention, revenue, medical symptoms and costs, complaints to building manager
Source: World Green Building Council (2014)
SLEEP AND HEALTHY LIVING
◼ People sleep over 20 years during their life time
◼ High quality sleep is vital for humans◼ Sleep improves cognitive performance
(memory and learning, and creativity), reduce health risks (dementia, Alzheimer’s disease), regulates hunger and fullness (obesity), reduce risks for car accidents, improves concentration and next-day performance
◼ People are getting more and more deprived of sleep, length (<7,5 hrs) and quality
◼ Is IEQ important?
Source: Walker (2017)
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF IMPROVING IAQ IN U.S. BUILDINGS
◼ Total costs - $87.9 billion (initial)(in 40% of US buildings regarded unhealthy)+ 4.8 billion/year (maintenance)
RELIABLE IAQ METRIC IS A MUST
Source: Steinemann et al. (2016)
◼ Lack of IAQ metric or disagreement what should constitute IAQ metric is a significant barrier holding back innovation of IAQ conducive technologies, emergence of undocumented methods of measurements of IAQ claiming their high efficiency and authenticity, this all resulting in undervaluing the importance of IAQ in different credit schemes and compliance metrics related to built environment
OVERVIEW OF THE MOST OFTEN USED IAQ INDICES
◼ “Ventilation rate”
◼Carbon dioxide (CO2) [CO2 => Ventilation rate]
◼Acceptability of (or the percentage of dissatisfied with) indoor air quality
◼Total concentration of volatile organic compounds (TVOCs)
Source: Wei et al. (in the press)HB2019 Asia, session 20
TAIL INDEX AS A METHODOF CLASSIFYING IEQ
Four components:◼ Thermal environment◼ Acoustic environment◼ Indoor air quality◼ Light – Luminous (visual)
environment
Overall IEQ:◼ I II III IV
Source: Wargocki et al., ASHRAE Journal December 2019
CONCLUSIONS AND “TAKE AWAYS”
◼ It is well documented that both thermal conditions and indoor air quality do affect the performance of office work and schoolwork.
◼ The mechanisms that mediate the effects of thermal conditions and indoor air quality on performance are surprisingly similar.
◼ Thermal conditions and indoor air quality tend to affect performance “across the board”, suggesting that it is the ability to concentrate and to think clearly that is affected, as this is common to all aspects of mental performance.
◼ It is not proven that subjective acceptance of indoor environmental conditions leads to optimal performance.
◼ Self-estimated performance is not an indicator of objectively measured performance.
◼ Motivation to perform well may itself be influenced by the indoor environment.
◼ Performance tests, however environmentally sensitive, may not in fact predict the performance of real work.
◼ The results obtained in laboratory experiments using paid subjects, simulated work and limited exposure times must be validated in field intervention experiments in which the performance of real work is monitored over time in normally functioning offices and schools.
◼ Negative effects on performance will increase progressively with increasing temperature even if some subjective habituation takes place
◼ Acceptance (psychological) of undesirably warm thermal conditions should not be equated with achieving thermal comfort
◼ Physiological and mental changes occur in response to warmth: headache, fatigue, difficulty in thinking clearly, dry eyes, reduced oxygen saturation and increased CO2 levels in blood, and decreased tear film quality (all affecting performance)
◼ Objective adaptation due to behavioral changes may not always occur: inconveniently high velocities, dress code, etc.
◼ People can often avoid discomfort by working less => one of the most reported behavioral adjustments is to ’take a break’ or to slow down work speed that definitely leads to decreased performance at high temperatures
CONSEQUENCES OF ELEVATED TEMPERATURES
Source: Lan et al. (2011); Krogstadt et al. (1991)
GREEN BUILDINGS AND PERFORMANCE
◼ Review of 37 peer-reviewed papers and 12 white papers or reports
◼ Self-estimated productivity generally improved in green buildings (n=14); in n=3 studies reversed effect was seen.Size of the effect 2-16%.
◼ Sick-leave reduced at the level 5-39% but no information whther the effects remain at the same level after years of working or are temporary.
Source: da Silva (2015)
DISBELIEF ON BENEFITS FOR PRODUCTIVITY IN GB
◼ It was examined how building stakeholders (n=112, sample of convenience) incl. owners, tennats, operators, designers, understand impacts of IAQ and associated energy costs
◼ Benefits and costs of ventilation and filter upgrade (9.5 to 19 L/sp and MERV 6 to 11 (G3=>F6))
◼ Minorities of respondents indicated benefits for productivity (45%), absenteeism (23%) or health (39%)
◼ Estimates for energy costs were 2-4 times higher than the estimates obtained through modelling
◼ Respondents holding green building credentials were not more likely to affirm IAQ benefits and less willing to pay for it
◼ Majority doubted or were uncertain of benefits and oversetimate the costs so IAQ community must reconsider existing education and outreach strategies to bridge the gap of understanding about the real benefits and costs of IAQ
Source: Hamilton et al. (2015)
NO AGREED & VALIDATED METHOD FOR VERIFICATION◼ Absence from work or workstation, unavailability on the telephone.
◼ Health costs, including sick leave (absenteeism), accidents and injuries.
◼ Interruptions to work, observed downtime.
◼ Controlled independent judgments of work quality and mood.
◼ Self-assessments of productivity.
◼ Component skills, task measures, speed and accuracy of work, for instance using simulated office work comprising arithmetical calculations, proof-reading and creative thinking, as well as tasks embedded in normal office work or schoolwork.
◼ Output from pre-existing work groups and existing company measures such as talk-time in call centers or claim handling time in insurance companies.
◼ Cost for the product of service.
◼ Exchanging output in response to graded reward.
◼ Voluntary overtime or extra time.
◼ Staff turnover.
◼ Cycle time from initiation to completion of process;.
◼ Multiple measures at all organizational levels.
◼ Individual measures of performance, health and well-being at work.
◼ Development of measures and patterns of change over time.
◼ Diagnostic psychological tests of short duration examining specific skills such as psychomotor performance, memory, verbal ability, mood, perceptual ability, etc., used normally to study the effects of drugs, sleep deprivation and relatively strong stressors;
◼ Physiological measures such as cerebral blood flow, measures of voice quality and breathing patterns.
MEASUREMENTS OF SELF-ESTIMATED PERFORMANCE
On the following 5 scales, please rate how you have been working this past week:
◼ The work seemed:Very Easy --------- Very Hard
◼ My level of effort was: Low ---------------- High
◼ The time pressure was:Low --------------- High
◼ I worked at: 0 -- 100% of my full capacity
◼ My performance was:Poor -------------- Excellent
SELF-ESTIMATED PERFORMANCE
IS NOT EQUAL TOPERFORMANCE MEASURED OBJECTIVELY
Source: Clausen and Wyon (2008)
REAL WORK DATA ARE NECESSARY
Source: Wargocki and Wyon (in the Press)
(SOME) UNSOLVED MATTERS AND CHALLENGES◼ Which pollutants can be associated with the
effects on performance?
◼ Are there any risks for performance associated with the use of adaptive thermal comfort model?
◼ Do green buildings promote performance?
◼ How can performance be reliably measured?
◼ Can the evidence on the effects of IEQ on performance be used in economic calculations?
◼ What is the combined effect of several IEQ parameters on performance?
◼ To which extent is performance affected by sleep quality that is affected by IEQ?
BEDROOM IEQ IN BUILDINGS TODAY
◼ Split AC in the Tropics reduce temperature and RH but reduce air quality due to need to conserve energy
◼ Housing insulation conserve energy but increase bedroom temperatures during summer
◼ CO2 levels in bedroom reach 5,000 ppm indicating very poor ventilation
Source: Bekö et al. (2010); Sekhar & Goh (2011)
TEMPERATURE AND SLEEP
◼ It is difficult to fall asleep and to stay asleep when the bedroom is too cold or too hot
◼ There is no single temperature that is ideal at all stages of the night
◼ Sleep quality seems to be enhanced when bedroom temperatures are warm when falling asleep and when waking but cool in between
Source: Pan et al. (2014); Lan et al. (2016)
IAQ AND SLEEP
Source: Zhou et al. (2014); Strøm-Tejsen et al. (2016)
Baseline(CO2 1620-3300 ppm)
Ge
ne
ral s
leep
qu
alit
y sc
ore
Improved vent.(CO2 795-935 ppm)
◼ Both sleep quality and next-day performance can be negatively affected when the outdoor air supply rate to the bedroom is reduced
◼ A small current of fresh air to the breathing zone seems to improve sleep quality