HOW CAN TEACHERS CONTRIBUTE TO DEVELOP EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS THROUGH MOTOR ACTIVITY? Tortella P .*, FumagalliG.+, TessaroF.* * University of Cà Foscari (Venice – Italy) + University of Verona - Center for research on motor development in childhood - - Italy 24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning society 1
27
Embed
How can teachers contribute to develop executive functions
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
HOW CAN TEACHERS CONTRIBUTE
TO DEVELOP EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
THROUGH MOTOR ACTIVITY?
Tortella P.*, Fumagalli G.+, Tessaro F.*
* University of Cà Foscari (Venice – Italy)
+ University of Verona - Center for research on motor
development in childhood - - Italy
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, RumaniaTransforming the educational relationship: intergenerational and
family learning for the lifelong learning society
1
What are the executive functions?They are top-down mental processes needed when you need to
concentrate and pay attention. The three core EFs are:
1) INHIBITION (inhibitory control)
self-control (behavioral
inhibition)
interferente control
Lehto et al. 2003; Miyake et al. 2000)
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
• Exercising bimanual coordination (Hillman et al., 2008;
Chaddock et al., 2011)
It is reasonable to think that sport might bevery benefit, thanks to challenge EFs(requiring sustanined attention, workingmemory) (Diamond, 2011)24-25 October 2013 Bucharest,
Rumania Transforming the educational relationship: intergenerational and
family learning for the lifelong learning society
10
How can teachers help children in
improving their school readiness?
FEW PRINCIPLES• The disadvantaged children benefit the most from any EFs
intervention or program (Flook et al., 2010; Karbach & Kray, 2009; Lakes & Hoyt, 2004)
• If difficulty doesn’t increase, the activity becomes boringand people lose interest. (Bergman Nutley et al., 2011; Holmes et al., 2009; Klingberg et al., 2005)
• Repeated practice is necessary. The success dipends on the amount of time spent working on improving the skills(Klingberg et al., 2005)
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
11
• At any age EFs can be improved, including in
the elderly and in infants (Erickson & Kramer,
2009; Voss et al., 2011)
• Bilingualism appears to accellerate EF
developent during childhood and preserve EFs
longer during aging (Bialystok & Viswanathan,
2009)2009)
• Exercise plus character development are
efficacious in improving EFs (Lakes & Hoyt,
2004)
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
12
SUMMARY POINTS
• Emotional, social and physical needs are necessary
for academic excellence;
• Stress, sadness, loneliness, lack of sleep, lack of
physical exercise couse suffering in prefrontal cortex
and in EFs;and in EFs;
• Good executive functions in children predict lifelong
achievement, health, wealth and quality of life;
• EFs are trainable and can be improved at any age by
different approaches;
• Repeated practice is the key.24-25 October 2013 Bucharest,
Rumania Transforming the educational relationship: intergenerational and
family learning for the lifelong learning society
13
OPEN QUESTIONS
• What can parents do to aid the development
of EFs in their children?
• Which are the best programs, what are the
best doses, durations, frequency, how long do best doses, durations, frequency, how long do
benefit last?
• Which activities not yet studied might
improve EFs?
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
14
The playground, a space to improve
motor skills and EFs• To improve health and motor activity is
important to propose spaces and opportunity
of activity.
• Play in outdoor spaces improves te welfare of
children (Ginsburg, K., R., 2007).children (Ginsburg, K., R., 2007).
• stay in green park improve childen’s attention
and concentration skills.
• Significative experiences depend on
frequency, intensity and duration of motor
activity (Klingberg et al., 2005).24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
15
• Child perception of difficult in free or structuredmotor activity affects on the level of hismotivation and self efficacy (Tortella et al., 2012)
• Extreme requests produce frustration and abandonment of the game.abandonment of the game.
• Motor activity contribute to cognitive development (EFs) when is associated withawareness and meta cognitive processes, accompanied by passion and enthusiasm (Hirt, Devers
& McCrea, 2008).
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
16
The Playground Primo Sport 0246 –
Treviso, Italy (built on a project for
motor development )
17
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
1. balance
2. Dexterity
The space is divided in 4 areas for motor development of
0-6 years old children
43 2
2. Dexterity
3. Mobility
4. Symbolic activity
1
43 2
3
18
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
THE RESEARCH
AIM: TO INDIVIDUATE IF AND HOW CAN
TEACHERS CONTRIBUTE TO DEVELOP
EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS THROUGH MOTOR EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS THROUGH MOTOR
ACTIVITY
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
19
SUBJECTS: 5 Kindergardens of Treviso (Italy) with 190 4-5 years old children;
• A) sperimental group (n. 40, 5 y old children);
teachers encourage verbally and physically the children to play in proximalzone (Vygotskij, 1978); tell the child to observe the activity of the childbefore him and to begin the activity when the other has arrived to a certain point of the path.
While is waiting every child has his defined place
• B) control group (n. 40, 5 years old children);
teachers don’t encourage the childrenteachers don’t encourage the children
every child begins the activity without indications
the children has not a defined place where to stay while waiting
Both groups are attending the Playground, 2 hours a week, for 10 weeks; each session is organized in 30 minutes of free play and 30 minutes ofstructured play in the areas of dexterity and balance.
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
20
METHODOLOGY (QUALITATIVE AND
QUANTITATIVE)
• PRE AND POST MOTOR AND COGNITIVE
TESTS: ABC Movement tests, (Henderson,
Sugden & Barnett, 2007); Day night test
(Gerstandt Hong, Diamond, 1994); Haga M., (Gerstandt Hong, Diamond, 1994); Haga M.,
tests (2009);
• Questionnaire, interviews and focus groups
with teachers and parents;
• Focus groups with children
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
21
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
FOCUS GROUPS: after 10 weeks of activity.
Teachers tell that children of group A
(sperimental) are more:
• able to cooperate and collaborate with each
otherother
• have a greater capacity to wait
• have greater ability to organize space
• more attention
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
22
Motor tests
SIGNIFICANT RESULTS (0,001) in motor
development:
• Balance• Balance
• Dexterity
In both A and B groups
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
23
CONCLUSION
Preliminary data seem to indicate that 10 weeks of motor activity in the playgrounds
contribute to improve:
1) (group A-B)
• motor skills: balance and dexterity
2) (group A)
• Executive Functions
• Motor skills: balance and dexterity
• Inhibition
• Planning
• Attention24-25 October 2013 Bucharest,
Rumania Transforming the educational relationship: intergenerational and
family learning for the lifelong learning society
24
CONCLUSION
• encourage verbally and physically the children;
• play motor activity in proximal zone (Vygotskij,
1978);
• invite the child to observe the activity of the child
before him ;before him ;
• autonomously begin the activity to a fixed signal
• Maintain a position while waiting
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
25
Seems to be a good opportunity :
1. To improve motor skills
2. To improve EFs
3. to reduce social disparities, by reducing the
EFs gap before school entryEFs gap before school entry
4. Improve social skills
5. Improve health
24-25 October 2013 Bucharest, Rumania Transforming the educational
relationship: intergenerational and family learning for the lifelong learning
society
26
Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!