How Answer Essay Exam

8/9/2014

・・

―

―

ESSAY

Hw ro An.w.r Esy'TYF ExM.

-r'--r-

wh?! lh9 eIg{He-I lgo\s {91t Kna,wledte .nd unde.sandint ot t,le hw

) Underst ndint of the hcts rnd isJu€s

, Presentrtion of ide:s

&qn!n

:9,雪

"1■,1■ 91l gO"攣,II………

) tocur

r Strxnrrcd

) Suppo.r.d t .urrDrlti.!

) \ /ell p.Eentad

Focus) Ansrlli_s rhoold be FrPoseful rnd directed.lt ,hord

lnnllr rll pirtl of th. qu$tion dir€cdr.

) Oft€n timea sn denta writ€ r.hdofi Ue8 thlnLnt dr.t ltrydl help imFove d|ejr rco.ea bequt. d!e, lno+{ d€'nAddin! r.ndom unrdrted ider will t ke 6G locut :w?from lll4 rnse,.. (he .ramine. 13 loount for re.ultin! toreduai, ot Frnt5.

Structured) Knowint 6a rnive. lo dle queition wll nor m:Eet if

)ou c.ntrot comrrrJniata )our ldei Properly.The :bilitlto co.rmlni(r!! dut knowledte dePendt on ho'v yoti

ttructuna roria &31,r4f,

t Tha tanda.d rt uctura of afluriaotrli'on L tyllotrlm lub:tk tttlcgrG (onibta ol nrlor Pae[ni3c,mhro Prrrniteand conalutlon.

) for 6t /a dla rtandrrd rElcqlat lr drair roGrneo( rulc'

.pplk t on rnd comlu,lon or da"TRAC".

r An rlt ..rdv. @TRAC lt tho b.rlc lylloSrnl.

Authontics

) An opinion h:r no value.Wh.a m:G.rt b $e.udE ity

Jupportint 6e .nstter-

r hi.rury lourtq 1L1rule..r S€condrr, iolne: Crte b\r'

) Third touraej Co.nnEnE b, qeried iodivirlrh.

1

8/9/20■ 4

:蕊雌‖‖謡調1癬∫窯l薇憮郷1罵詳識i蠍澄謡rIWttl‖

::‖iЪい゙ギは‐

Avoid the

1灘隠kl籠脚:雛 n

Art.r d.lnllnt on. (l) c.rc ot San t'lltu.l beer-and,.t tln!.. g,,c..pLlsr. ot..:r'u&Eaa:.. !hof.. a.. fillpL.lo.lcamaa. aobbad to dealh Sio M),, a Slntaporeln ieaman.aboard l,UV 'Prlnaer! o[ lhe Paclllc.. an oycr5eat v$aelwhlch wtt ratltnt ln rhc South Chlnr Sat. The y*ral,d$outh Panr-manl.n rclittcrad. lt owncd by lucro Sy.a rlch Flllplno brratnerrmin. When t,t/V 'pdncelj of rheP.clllc' ra.ched e philipplne port .r Cebu Ctr/, rheCeptaln of rhe verrel turned over !h! arjajlant Bino, tolhc Phtltpptne aulhoritlaj. An informadon lor homjcidety.r lll.d agiinsE Bho, ln the Re&on.l Tnal Coun ofLaa'tJ Ltqr He movcd (o qurrh rhe informadon lor lackofiurisdtciion.

will pu tn the modonf vv}rrl

・ 榛 ′

2

8/9/2014

鶉 湯拙 酔 誌誌赫 ふ

I~……∵l・―・ ― ‐…… … |

*- jf:*- h:5 r deGnse l'trry wid, EvA

熙凝寝轟滅胸鷲齢∫."*,Ifr,1*il:,HH m : To

* *

揚Thu5 it“ ぃ。cOn:utuぃ 。n“

`peal=

- ln osa ol conilct belvltsr r rr!.t, rnd dE

.Conldsdee .lr.ir. rh..h|t r.,d{t .pr*.ilr.b€aute -ot. d}o.pairxlph ol cofidfqdo,lal auprarnacf Thir providc, tlutryhlry-lil ruh o. rrlrtl-dra b tlt confic wirh dl!Contdudo.r la l wrlld.

.... Cdlrf .na hcr hre hoJb.nd Llls h.d two.childraq &ora.andJ.aL Om.aueeea.hai mo$€.-la-.law. rted 70, rook thc two childrEr. dten .ted lO.nd12. wlth har on a boar tnp !o Cebu. Unfonunatcry. (h!vasjcl iank an routa. and tha bodlar of t rc thrac we.en6rcr found. Nonc ol tha rurvtvofi dr:r raw tharn ontha witer. On tha tetdcrhant of har mothcr-ln-hw!eitrt!. Cir,t/ 6lei a claim fo. . rhara of her cit r. onthe groud dl.t th! rarna wri lnherited b, he. childrcnfrom drdr grrndmodrer in raprelcnooo[ of thelrhthe[ rnd rhe Inherltcd the rame from thsr! will heraction prorperf (2000)

,,t'* I...T:- 1*** Anactero wirl a boto but the..le rraa aola.ra pirrl.it.wi(hllls hDd

If :^f .:.1.

:J,:;,e; #;;,ffi T[T"H.,v! .ue ro hact Anicleto f,,-r;- rpor,cemen a,,iveo and th,e-a;""J;:;,:*** *.""

#,;-:,": l,: ,"," ,,.""" )*1.'1".."0i,,H":tr.llo

:/ u,c po ce et the prosecutor,. 6ri.. ,homrcrde Twenn.ri,"'.r,::;::1' :1:'* ror attempted

inveir;Eeuon *"; "

;;;:.:";: Tne lne prer,minary*i, rushed tou,E .osprrar oecause of symorom. ^L-,.1on t,'e (wo.,nch

";,;.-ffi:;''r"" "::b"n,'

inr"cdon

d'cd (]he followng dar. - " "!\!u u/ vrcentc. Anacleto

3

Nq the rctlon will not prosper' Under the Civil

.Code.wttetr.dterc-b. no.prno(,ar.to..who- died-firrt.benneen.pecom niro tre crlled to rucceed each other it is

grelumed dut they died rt the seme time and there will be

no trrnrmlslon of rlghu.

ln this cese, there is no proof that the mother-inlaw

died rherd of the children; consequently' they ere presumed

to h:vo dled rimuluneously.As such. Cristy hrs no ritht tolnhorh hom hr mother-inJrw rs eny ritht therefor rryould

necessrrilT rnquire thrt the death of her children was

rubrequent to thrt of her mother'in-law.Thus, the action

wlll not prosper.

僣 √

Disunguish lundical capadγ and Capadty to act・(:990……Ⅲ………………

1……・……………………………――・

(S)The brrrer an exist witlrut the lener, but dte

hmr cannot sitt widrogt the brrner.

No, the actron will not Prosper as the children rrd'chespther-i+ttw.rre.pnseumed'to SatedierJ'et"the'c.rne'time and there were no transmission of ri$16' Under the

law, as betureen persons.who are celled to succeed each

orher, in the rbsence of proof u to wtto die<, first it is

presumed that they di€d rt the srme 6me rnd $ere is no

ransmission of righs. Thre being no u-ansmision of rights

in this case, Crirty cennot inherit from her mother'in'law.

The difercnce bcnis't lirHlc.l caoadt, rnd creadq E. 39!. tt-€.,i.s. I9!1!|{t;

(l) The brnrr rcfiert to &e fittEsi to dte be $6iect o,lcgal reiaiionr wftlla thc huer ndGn to thc Porcr to do rtgwidl leg:rl eftcu:

(2)Thc forrtr b p.sdvawhlc dlc bEcr B .cthc

(3) The forncr is inhereff Io 6rcry Perto.l wltL dtc

hcer is tnerery .cquircd;

(,t) The frcrrncr lr bst onty drrotr6h dcrdrwtltc thG l@,nay be restrict€d by ouses odrer dnn dcrd[ r'rd

\ffhat is the doctrine of implied consPrracyl

4

(19901

8/9/2014

出:ふ盤よT譜嚇淵:潔∫解摯"禦

三

The rrth'pelrg'c doctnne it r€necred in dE |tg'c**.rJ li.,ir"-r,s*,iotl f Prtlfld6 dnr dre rrtiqal

JJii- "r the PhiliPpine5 include' dE Ph'lpine

l-i,*I". *,n .I d; ist:rd! rnd w?ter' ernba'ed

;,.ji.li-a ,* wre.s rro'rnd' bew?ee'\ rnd conne<on8

; ,;b^d;;i d'" r.th'PehEo. resrdrest o( trr€ir bre'ddr

;;; ;;;;* rorm Prn ot d'e 'ntEm'r

wzre.. ol d'e

Philip nel.

思蹴懸事 盤l鷲灘酬犠蹴颯岬!為…vesset

c・_ぃ昭器脇 露r脇肥誠問

- - In ihr fiiii iiltlili6 rJ*n to"t*ttt*ld*---r","a.'uJ* a" pti

"lPle o{

't:e imr nity the Sote

onnot be 3ued $droUt ltt (on3cnl

ln drlr o5q th.E n no 'horrin8

dut dre Stat! t't!irt.onr'ent o be r,rcd drtive to t,le in<il€nt in qo"tixti.-J'- rt oc.e,.pma .-rol

't r rur:l oF'tin b

o3t€naablY a iori lmPeaii.

Thirr" rha nlotiolt to ditn{3s tholld bc tr'nt'd'

Th€ doctrine of imPlied (onsPiracy holdt tulo cf,

nors ;; vatuoPd6'ildre'<ornmrsstoq of ''cnrne

.ir'-t-*, to-*,6r" end lirble rs co'conlPrr'tos

J-Jju.-..n, u*t to that eflect' when the' act

il-ffi-i"r.i"-r"8 uniry of criminel ntent 'nd '

:;;; -;;* o' -ou1*'i"' rhe errrr€nce of a

"I'.J-."i.ir * "r"-"a

or deduced from thar criminl

oiliip",ir" ," p.,-,,g t* cnrir end thu3 dre 2ct ol one

rhrll be deatned the rct of ell

……… ………………・

:…………………… _一

Th. arEhipelad( dodnne emPhuzes de unir/ ot

'lradrrd.upieri b, d€6nin6rn 'r6{tebEo

e{h€t rs '

grouP'

Jl,r-r."at *.-*a"a bi **tt ot ' body of \ivrter!

."-JJ-*J tr,..at. Foi air p,'po'e' it r€quiret thrt

ffi; ; ;; t -nnecr;ng the reprop"ate po'nu or

ff;ffi";i.i.Jt to encircte ttre iilrndr widin rr'e

ll .-ii* *"* on rtrc ludw'"d rde ol dG

i.Iffi'U.aL J u*"dth or dimensions ,e dEr€t

一ｂ

8/el2Ot4

b.

'-" '-"'lnthe sEcond case;6€'rnodon to dismhrshould'b€-

denial. Aldrough state immunity preclr'rdes the filing of suits

against the Stl-te without its consenL the senre crnnot be

,i"d .. .n insrurnent br perqSgrating iniusdce ltainst r

Person.

The Bill of Righa ensures to dre person that.his

ommrtv cannot be aken frcr public use without iustloripeniation. Corollery thereto. the Supreme Coun has

ruled ttrat when Sovernnrent t2kea ProPelty for.gublic usq

subiect to iust iompensation. it rnakes manilest that lt

;ffi; ;; ti," lr.itaii,tion of the cours ln effecc an implied

ionsent is made.Thus. dre motion should be denied'

What are the requisites of a valid marriagel

The requiritcr of I vetxl murlege rre rs b[orr:'

(r) trfrt cePdt}t;

(b) Conrot hedY giveu

(3) AudoritY ol dre rohmirfq ofrcr;(a)\hlid rnrrr{c ltcnrq rnd

(5) MrrrirgG cerlrllony.

6

L"""'-"Tti6'iiittidn'iii' diimiii'ihduld' ttr' tiini'ii'.ii' th6' iiiilt'

lr brred by the principle of sote immuniry' The said

principle Provldec dlrt that stete cannot b€ sued without iB

tont*" ih"r" being no exPress or implied consent in this

crse dte llrn€ should be dismissed'

T-

b,

'---'*'Ttii-'ri*t'6on"iTtoufd"tl6'A6iiiai1 ' orti6^'tii6'ii.'fiiiilil'ruuh to lnlurdcr Thc Suprenre Court har ruled thrt

lnvnrnity hom rult crnnot be invoke to PerPerate iniurdce'

ln drlr ctra3nnting the motion uould deny X the recourre

; Jl; ai nr,i frrr hls hrd, therebv deferting the

;*tdard",t t right 6rt no Privee ProPefty shdl b€ t'ken

br publk urc without iust compeflsauon'

A vrlH nurlaSc conrlstr of cspntirl rnd brrrld

'rlqnifu$tDwlc

Thc ccsendd rc$rbltel rrcr (l) legd ceprcity rnd (b)

contdlt frtdI tlvo& On thc othr hend' the brmd

,.qrir- rrti trl uoority of the rolemnirlng officcr' (b)

vrlld rnrrrlla lkonrc"rnd (c) rnlrriege crerony'

,.,"';',#"""""',,

8/9/1014

.■・‐

~1緩′ ~

7