HOUSTON | GPS September 10-11th, 2015
HOUSTON | GPS September 10-11th, 2015. Importance of Data.
Jan 02, 2016
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
HOUSTON | GPSSeptember 10-11th, 2015
Importance of Data
Metrics
Outcomes Degrees Graduation & Transfer Rates Time & Credits to Degree
Momentum points Remediation rates and success Gateway completion First-year credit accumulation Retention
Data by race, age, gender, income, remedial status
Data by sector & student enrollment status (full/part-time)
Adopted by National Governors Assoc.
On-Time Graduation RatesWhy GPS
?
University of Houston
16%
2006 Cohort, Full-Time Students
CCA Median (Non-Flagship)
22%
Texas(Non-Flagship)
23%
150% Graduation RatesWhy GPS
?
University of Houston
46%
2006 Cohort, Full-Time Students
CCA Median (Non-Flagship)
48%
Texas(Non-Flagship)
50%
University of HoustonDowntown
13%
Transfer Graduation Rates (w/in 4 Years)
44%
Why GPS
? University of Houston
46%
University of Houston-Downtown
61%
University of Houston-Clear Lake
2006 Transfer Cohort
On-Time Graduation Rates
3.1%
Why GPS?
Houston Community
College
3.2%
Lone Star College System
4.6
Wharton County Junior College
2.8%
San JacintoCollege
2008 Cohort, Full-Time Students
150% Graduation Rates
8.7%
Why GPS?
Houston Community
College
9.1%
Lone Star College System
4.6
Wharton County Junior College
2008 Cohort, Full-Time Students
10%
San JacintoCollege
150% Graduation Rates Transfer Cohort
11.8
Why GPS
? Houston Community
College
9.4%
Lone Star College System
12.6
Wharton County Junior College
2008 Transfer Cohort
11.5%
San JacintoCollege
150% Graduation Rates Transfer Cohort
11.8
Why GPS
? Houston Community
College
9.4%
Lone Star College System
12.6
Wharton County Junior College
2008 Transfer Cohort
11.5%
San JacintoCollege
30.5 28 22.2 36.1
Transfer RatesTransfer to 4-Year Institution w/in 2 Years
17.3 19.111.7
25.7
Transfer with > 30 Credits
Time to Degree 4-YearWhy GPS
?
2010-11 Graduates
University of Houston
Time to Degree
University of Houston-Clear Lake
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Time to Degree
Full-Time Part-Time Trans,<30 Trans, 31-59 Trans, >60
Credits to Degree 4-YearWhy GPS
?
2010-11 Graduates
University of Houston
Time to Degree
University of Houston-Clear Lake
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Credits to Degree
Full-Time Part-Time Trans,<30 Trans, 31-59 Trans, >60
Story
Entering students don’t always complete
About 50% of transfer students do complete within 4 years
Only a small number of students transfer
Still requires excess time and credits particularly for transfer students
Further Exploration
Differences across demographic groups
What happens once they get in Remedial enrollment & Success Gateway Success Credit Accumulation Retention
Are their unique circumstances or trends to explore?
What other data may be available
HOUSTON | GPSMemorandum of Understanding
Tracking Student Progression: Data for Project Evaluation
– Participating institutions will track the progress and outcomes of cohorts by meta-major using key progress milestones such as rate at which students: complete 15 credits in 1 term, complete 30 credits in 1 year, are retained from term 1 to term 2 and from year 1 to year 2, and complete a credential.
– Community colleges will track the rates at which students transfer to a 4-year institution (by receiving institution) and, among those who transfer, the percentage who complete a bachelor’s degree.
Questions
?
17
Related Documents
