Housing Delivery Test Action Plan Support Overview of support Ivan Tennant, AECOM Richard Crawley, PAS April 2019 www.local.gov.uk/pas
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Housing Delivery Test Action
Plan Support
Overview of support
Ivan Tennant, AECOM
Richard Crawley, PASApril 2019 www.local.gov.uk/pas
PAS Past event slide deck
• This deck was used on the 16th and 18th April
2019
• The deck is unchanged, although the groups
asked for several changes to the way support
was packaged and delivered.
Welcome
• Housekeeping
• Small group – introductions
• Reminder
– HDT is not our policy
• Feedback forms
– Will be shared – a good opportunity ?
Delegates were asked for two
numbers to describe the
importance and progress of HDT
Leeds London
Key messages: LGA
“It is wrong to impose unfair and undeliverable
targets which fail to take into account the
complexity and unique needs of local areas.
This risks leading to a housebuilding free-for-all
with councils and residents powerless to ensure
the right homes are built in the right places in
their communities.”
Cllr Martin Tett, Housing spokesman at the Local Government
Association
Introduction and justification
Today we aim to:
• Explain the offer of support
• Explain how to prepare and engage
• Give you the opportunity for Q&A
• Provide a preview of each part of the support
• Be clear about what to do next
• Feel free to interrupt or interject at any point!
**** Notes for you ****
• In the first cohort there were no councils below
25%
• The following set of maps use the 2018 results
with the 2020 thresholds
– 95% = yellow = Action Plan
– 85% = gold = Action Plan + buffer
– 75% = red = Action Plan + buffer + presumption
• You may want to work together with your
neighbours on the HDTAP
EE
WM
L
NE
NW
SE
SW
EM
Y&H
• All about housing delivery
• Policy context – NPPF (p. 75) and PPG (p 071-
072)
• Results published 19th February
• Action Plan deadline 19th August
• Four “stages” to production of AP
Briefly, why we’re doing this
Support delivery
Interaction
with Councils
through K-
HUB
Support Delivery
15%
25%
20%
20%
单击添加标题
囚心钻研，诚心不贰囚心钻研，诚心不贰
单击添加标题
囚心钻研，诚心不贰囚心钻研，诚心不贰
单击添加标题
囚心钻研，诚心不贰囚心钻研，诚心不贰
单击添加标题
囚心钻研，诚心不贰囚心钻研，诚心不贰
15%
Stepped “Course”
Running From May
– August
High Quality
Action Plans
Delivered To
MHCLG By
Deadline
Regional
Workshops-
Sign Up for
all four
events!
单击添加标题
囚心钻研，诚心不贰囚心钻研，诚心不贰
Technical
support
available
Fixed
Window To
Deliver Each
Work-stage
AECOM teamDavid
Carlisle
MRTPI
Associate
Director,
Buildings +
Places
Ivan Tennant
AssocRTPI
Principal Planner,
Housing Research
+ Delivery
Matthew
Smedley
MRTPI
Associate
Planner,
Environment
and Planning
Paul Avery
Senior
Consultant
Housing
Research +
Delivery
Anthony
Whitaker
MRTPI
Principal
Planner
Buildings +
Places
Karlene Stubbs
Trainee Planner
Housing Research +
Delivery
Timeline
Week commencing15th 22nd 29th 6th 13th 20th 27th 3rd 10th 17th 24th 1st 8th 15th 22nd 29th 5th 12th 19th
1: Training, mobilisation, and critical path
Workshop / webinar
2: Assembling the evidence
Workshop / webinar
3: Root cause analysis
Workshop / webinar
4: Writing the Action Plan
Closing event
April May June July August
Milestone 1: Initial training,
mobilisation and critical path
Take it seriously!
• Manchester feedback - “getting members to address
difficult decisions”
• A opportunity for cross-cutting
• Relevant to any housing or corporate strategy
• Lobbying for more powers/flexibility
• Resources and critical path
• Current data gathering and categorisation
• Engagement – developers and other stakeholders
• Need for sponsorship from senior officers
• Sign-off – Cabinet? Corporate Director?
Deliverable 1 - submit critical path
Milestone 1: Initial training,
mobilisation and critical path
Initial training, mobilisation and
critical path: workshop outline
Session 1: Introduction: Discuss perceptions and challenges and present example of the critical path
Session 2: Indicators and gathering data – HDTAP pilots’ review
Session 3: Culture change and organisational support – HDTAP pilots’ review
Session 4: The common data standard – justification and practice
Session 5: Questions and general discussion
Questions
Any questions..?
Milestone 2: Assembling the
evidence base: workshop preview
• SLAPPED: S - Supply; L - Leadership A - Attraction P
- Process P - Policy E - Entrepreneurship D - Demand
• Drawing data from different stages of the
“development pipeline” (e.g. AMR, SHLAA, 5YHLS)
• Stakeholder engagement; developer forums
• Evidence any “clear and obvious” issues.
Deliverable 2 – ‘evidence log’ and completed Common
Data Standard form
Milestone 2: Assembling the
evidence base – Milton Keynes
Milestone 2: Assembling the
evidence base – Milton Keynes
• Supply-side issues - converting ‘commitments’ into
‘completions’, lack of diversity, poor infrastructure
alignment with development
• Leadership – community engagement
• Process - DM, pre-apps and S106
• Entrepreneurship - capacity to form a WOC,
organisational structure (MKPD – MK Property)
• Demand-side issues - supply not matching demand,
place-marketing
Data Standard
• Complete Common Data Standard form to help
understand housing delivery and supply ‘components’.
• Captures historic delivery data plus future supply
regardless of where a site is in the ‘development
pipeline’.
• Standardised to allow comparison between sites and
between LPAs.
Data Standard
• Captures ‘strategic’ and ‘other’ sites to help
understand the different types of supply in your
area (and potential sites in SHLAA)
• Robust data on lead-in times and build-out rates for
different sites
• Qualitative commentary on progress and delays
• Template and guidance documents to follow
Data Standard
Data Standard
Data Standard
• Actual/expected delivery
• Planning commentary (current activity/progress, site
sub-division/phasing, S106 triggers/issues, pre-
commencement conditions)
• Summary of key issues
• RAG rating
• Potential actions and interventions: What? When?
Who? Status?
Assembling the evidence base -
Workshop outline
Session 1: Introduction: SLAPPED analysis - the Common Data Standard and Evidence Log
Session 2: Supply and Demand
Session 4: Leadership, Entrepreneurialism and Attraction
Session 3: Process and Policy
Session 5: Draft Evidence Log and Common Data Standard
Questions
Any questions..?
Over to Richard for a review of what was learnt during
the HDT Pilots…
Any pilots in the room ?
HDT pilots
Key messages
1. Thinking about delivery isn't new
– HDT is not self contained and new
– It is part of monitoring / land supply / AMR
2. Will the “punishment” matter ?
– Greenbelt / underbound / protected
– Greenfield / sequencing / pepperpot
3.This is bigger than planning
– Coordinating housing, regen, assets
– Leadership and relationships
Key messages
4. There are two ways to “pass” the test
– deliver more, or reduce the requirement (in a plan)
5.Unforseen consequences ?
– Presumption at scale within 3 years
– HS2 ? CaMkOx ? London Plan ?
6.There is no sanction for non compliance (or
bad faith compliance)
– But perhaps link will form with “up to date”?
Key message: Planning Committee
• The HDT replaces the question “is my under-
delivery persistent ?”
– only add 20% buffer if HDT < 85%
• The HDT creates a new route to presumption
– If under the 25% -> 45% -> 75% floor
• But it is the same “presumption” and the same
“tilted balance” if without a land supply
– But clearer, and fixed for 12 months
Milestone 3: Root cause and possible
responses: workshop preview
• Review of SLAPPED analysis from each Council
• Linking evidence to possible actions
Deliverable 3 – “key issues” analysis with reference
to sources of evidence
Linking evidence to actions
Supply
• Using publicly owned land/assets; MK property lead
• Diversification strategies with developers
• Developers with different business models
• Addressing market failure; CPO Burgess Hill
• Securing infrastructure funding to unlock
development
• Addressing an overreliance on particular site
typologies in maintaining delivery rates.
Linking evidence to actions
Demand
• Influence housing mix and location
Attraction
• marketing and place-making prospectus
Linking evidence to actions
• Process – improving the DM or plan-making function
(speed, certainty)
• Policy –allocations, ‘enabling’ policies (flexibility; broad-
area; criteria-based) Section 106, viability
• Entrepreneur- and Leader-ship – corporate structure
and governance, housing deals, making the case for
development
Milestone 3: Root cause – workshop
outline
Session 1: Show and tell from each Council on evidence and proposed actions
Session 3: this is a living course, it’s to be decided…
Session 2: Discussion and feedback from consultants and officers
Milestone 4: Putting it together –
writing the Action Plan
• SMART Actions to enable effective monitoring
– Specific; Measurable; Achievable; Realistic;
Timebound
• Prioritisation; early, medium and long-term wins
• Consultation and engagement
Deliverable 4 – Submission of Action Plan
Swindon: pilot example
• Small city around 230,000 people
• Common issues
Milestone 4: Putting it together –
writing the Action Plan
Two group events in London and Manchester in which
to share learning and discuss challenges…
Support overview
4. Kick-off workshop
1. Council prep to
review pilots and PAS
self-serve materials
3. Specific guidance
circulated one week
before
7. Feedback on
deliverables
6. K Hub support2. Send perceptions and
challenges
5. Webinar
What to do next…
• Inform PAS of your interest in taking part
• Prepare for Milestone 1: critical path,
resources, sponsorship, key indicators
• Review self-serve materials and pilot action
plans
• Prepare your critical path
@Pas_Team
web www.local.gov.uk/pas
phone 020 7664 3000
Ivan Tennant
020 7061 7156
Related Documents
