HOT TOPICS IN BREAST CANCER Chieti, 11 Novembre 2009 OLD AND NEW ANTHRACYCLINES: OLD AND NEW ANTHRACYCLINES: a still valid option in breast cancer treatment a still valid option in breast cancer treatment A. Nuzzo U.O. di Oncologia Medica Ospedale Renzetti di Lanciano A. Nuzzo U.O. di Oncologia Medica ASL Lanciano-Vasto
44
Embed
HOT TOPICS IN BREAST CANCER Chieti, 11 Novembre 2009 OLD AND NEW ANTHRACYCLINES: a still valid option in breast cancer treatment A. Nuzzo U.O. di Oncologia.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
HOT TOPICS IN BREAST CANCERChieti, 11 Novembre 2009
OLD AND NEW ANTHRACYCLINES: OLD AND NEW ANTHRACYCLINES:
a still valid option in breast cancer a still valid option in breast cancer
treatmenttreatment
A. NuzzoU.O. di Oncologia Medica
Ospedale Renzetti di LancianoA. Nuzzo
U.O. di Oncologia Medica
ASL Lanciano-Vasto
“Agosto 1968. Ho terminato di visitare i pazienti ricoverati e sto rientrando nel mio studio dove mi
attende Aurelio Di Marco per illustrarmi le caratteristiche di un nuovo farmaco antitumorale
che è stato isolato da Federico Arcamone nei laboratori di Farmitalia.
Peto R on behalf of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Presented at SABCS 2007, December 13, 2007. San Antonio, TX.
10
0 5 10 0 5 10 0 5 10
50
0
40
30
20
Death rates (% / year: total – rate in women without recurrence) & logrank analyses
Anthr.31.0%
Taxane25.9%
%+ SE
10-y gain 5.1% (SE 1.6)Lorank 2p < 0.00001
15.3
12.8
Years
10-y gain 4.3% (SE 1.0)Lorank 2p < 0.00003
10-y gain 4.3% (SE 1.0)Lorank 2p < 0.00001
YearsYears
CMF31.3%
Anthr.27.0%
Control36.4%
CMF32.2%
20.5
17.8
19.9
16.5
Taxanes > Anthra. > CMF > No Chemo.
a still valid option in breast cancer a still valid option in breast cancer treatment?treatment? FALSE !!FALSE !!
Anthracyclines and Early Breast Cancer: The End of an
Era?L. Gianni, Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009
Anthracyclines are a mainstay of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer patients worldwide, but some research data suggest that not all patients benefit.
Some of the latest studies suggest that a large majority of patients (70%–80%) might not benefit,
Early Breast Cancer can be treated with less toxic but equivalent regimens.
1. leucemogene2. cardiotossiche
Le antracicline sono farmaci tossici ?
710 donne in premenopausa, pN+ FEC (5FU 600 mg/mq 1° e 8° + EPI 60 mg/mq 1° e
8°, EDX per os 75 mg/mq 1°-14° ) vs CMF classico FU mediano 10 anni
Levine MN et al: J Clin Oncol 1998
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil
chemotherapy compared to cyclophosphamide, emethotrexate and
fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. NCI of Canada
Clinical Trials Group
FEC intensive
CMF per os
DFS (§) 52% 45%OS 62% 58%
(§) significativo
M. Crump et al., J Clinical Oncology 2003
Risk of Acute Leukemia Following Risk of Acute Leukemia Following Epirubicin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Epirubicin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy:
A Report From the National Cancer Institute of Canada A Report From the National Cancer Institute of Canada
Clinical Trials GroupClinical Trials Group
CARDIOTOSSICITA’ DA CARDIOTOSSICITA’ DA ANTRACICLINE: UN PROBLEMA ANTRACICLINE: UN PROBLEMA
CLINICO EMERGENTECLINICO EMERGENTE
Più lunga sopravvivenza dei pazienti La potenziale guarigione di molti
pazienti trattati con antracicline (neoplasie ematologiche, terapia adiuvante del ca. mammario, neoplasie pediatriche)
Acquisizione di dati a lungo termine
CARDIOTOSSICITA’: TIPO I e II
TIPO I TIPO IIFARMACO DOXORUBICINA TRASTUZUMAB
DOSE CORRELATA
SI NO
MECCANISMO STRESS OSSIDATIVO
INIBIZIONE HER-2
DANNO ULTRASTRUTTU
RA
PRESENTE ASSENTE
REVERSIBILITA’ NO SI
RECHALLENGE NO POSSIBILE
Ewer MS. JCO 2005;23:2900-2902
“…Anthracycline cardiomyopathy is characterized by a dose-dependent progressive decrease in systolic left ventricular function often resulting in CHF. In the adult survivor, it is clinically indistinguishable from CHF due to other causes…”
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 25 (September 1), 2007: pp. 3991-4008
Tossicità cardiaca doxorubicina vs epirubicina
Dose RatioDose Ratio1:1.71:1.7
Mouridsen, Acta Onc ’90: 29; 257-85
AC x 4AC-Tax
TAC x 6
FEC x 3- Doce
CARDIOTOSSICITA’ TARDIVA DA DOXORUBICINA
Zambetti M et al, JCO 2001;19,37-43
1000 ptsCMF (363 pt)
CMF + doxorubicina (637: 300 mg/mq)(3 studi di CT adj)
CHF nel 0,6% tutte trattate con doxo: 1%
Follow up mediano = 14 aa : mortalità per cardiopatia 0,4%
355 paz libere da malattia a 11 aa:
alterazioni ECG = 23% alterazioni ecocardio = 34% < LVEF 8% in doxo vs 2% p=.032
van Dalen EC, Michiels EM, Caron HN, Kremer LC. Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):
van Dalen EC, Michiels EM, Caron HN, Kremer LC. Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):
van Dalen EC, Michiels EM, Caron HN, Kremer LC. Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):
Van Dalen et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):
Meta-analisi degli studi di fase III Confronto tra Antracicline rispetto alla
Cardiotossicità
The Cochrane review
“Based on the currently available evidence on heart failure, we conclude that in adults with a solid tumour liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin should be favoured over doxorubicin.”
“Until more evidence becomes available on tumour response and survival in patients treated with liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin or doxorubicin in equimolar doses, we recommend the use of a higher cumulative liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin dose as compared to the standard cumulative doxorubicin dose
Van Dalen EC et al. The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 4
Quante zampe ha questo elefante?
Fattori predittivi ?
Fattori predittivi
Terapia
efficace
Riduzione complessiva del 20% del rischio di recidiva
DOSE CUMULATIVA E RISCHIO DI SCOMPENSO NEI PAZIENTI ANZIANI
Swain et al. Cancer. 2003: 97, 2869-2879
Identifying Breast Cancer Patients Who Won't Respond to Anthracyclines
TOPOISOMERASI II alfa
Top II a
Fig. 15
depliant
• Proteina di 170 kdaltonProteina di 170 kdalton
• Posizione 17 q 21-22Posizione 17 q 21-22
• Riparazione DNA tramite Riparazione DNA tramite legame covalentelegame covalente
AMPLIFICAZIONE DELLA TOP II AMPLIFICAZIONE DELLA TOP II α NEL CARCINOMA MAMMARIONEL CARCINOMA MAMMARIO
Co-amplificazione TOP II Co-amplificazione TOP II α / HER-2/ HER-2 35% delle pz con HER-2 amplificato35% delle pz con HER-2 amplificato (Slamon D, SABCS 2006)(Slamon D, SABCS 2006)
37% delle pz con HER-2 amplificato37% delle pz con HER-2 amplificato (Tanner M, JCO 2006)(Tanner M, JCO 2006)
Amplificazione TOP 2 II Amplificazione TOP 2 II α / HER-2 non / HER-2 non amplificatoamplificato 1,7 – 10,3%1,7 – 10,3% (Knoop AS, JCO 2005)(Knoop AS, JCO 2005)
Amplificazione TOP II II αCome fattore predittivo di risposta alle antracicline nel carcinoma Come fattore predittivo di risposta alle antracicline nel carcinoma
della mammelladella mammella
Dal 2002, almeno 6 studi pubblicati hanno dimostrato Dal 2002, almeno 6 studi pubblicati hanno dimostrato l’associazione tra amplificazione TOP 2A e miglior outcomel’associazione tra amplificazione TOP 2A e miglior outcome
heterogeneity c25 = 5.2, p = 0.39heterogeneity c25 = 5.5, p = 0.36
Test for interaction chi2 = 12.0, p < 0.001
Study HR 95% CI0.47 - 0.92
0.69 - 1.18 0.66 0.90 NSABP B11
0.63 - 1.060.88 - 1.30
0.821.07 NSABP B15
0.27 - 2.690.85 - 3.15
0.85 1.64 GUN 3
0.32 - 1.160.89 - 1.79
0.611.26 Milan
0.50 - 1.050.59 - 1.13
0.730.82DBCG-89-D
0.42 - 1.010.80 - 1.40
0.651.06 NCIC MA-5
0.62 - 0.850.92 - 1.16
0.73 1.03
Overall
HER2 positive HER2 negative
non anthra betteranthra better
0.6 1 2 50.4
p < 0.0001
p = 0.86
0.9
A. Gennari SABCS 2006
0.83 - 1.000.91Total p = 0.056
The role of topoisomerase II alpha and HER-2 in predicting sensitivity to anthracyclines in breast cancer patients. Oakman C, Moretti E, Galardi F, Santarpia L, Di Leo A
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Sep 14.
•In the search for predictive biomarkers to refine clinical prescription of cytotoxic agents, both HER-2 and topo IIα are under exploration for their potential role in identifying individuals with early breast cancer who may benefit from anthracycline therapy. •Whilst recent meta-analyses support a predictive role for HER-2 amplification, it remains unclear whether HER-2 is the critical biomarker or whether it is a surrogate marker for topo IIα alteration, a known drug target of anthracyclines. •The major limitation in considering HER-2 as a single marker is heterogeneity within the subgroups of HER-2 positive and HER-2 negative disease.
The role of topoisomerase II alpha and HER-2 in predicting sensitivity to anthracyclines in breast cancer patients. Oakman C, Moretti E, Galardi F, Santarpia L, Di Leo A.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Sep 14.
•For topo IIα, current data is inconclusive. Issues plaguing this field are technical variability in marker definition, complex regulation pathway of topo IIα and lack of prospective, adequately powered studies. •With current evidence, neither HER-2 nor topo IIα gene status can be considered clinically valuable markers for anthracycline benefit.
factors associated with responsiveness to the
anthracycline-containing regimen amplification of the human
epidermal growth-factor receptor type 2 (HER2) gene (K. Pritchard et al, N Engl J Med. 2006).
alterations in the topoisomerase II alpha (TOP II II α ) gene (K. Pritchard et al, JNCI 2009)
“I do not use any of these data to guide my own treatment
decision-making “ K. Pritchard
uomo barbuto o donna nuda ?
Abbiamo alternative migliori delle antracicline ?
Jones, S. et al. J Clin Oncol; 27:1177-1183 2009
Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (A) DFS by treatment; (B) DFS by treatment and age; (C) OS by treatment: 1 day; (D) OS by treatment and
age
Jones, S. et al. J Clin Oncol; 27:1177-1183 2009
Summary of unplanned, exploratory analyses of disease-free survival hazard ratios (HR) and CI
Summing-up
Anthracyclines remain a mainstay of EBC and ABC treatment
Cardiovascular and leukemogen risk however is not trivial and should not be overlooked
Data suggest that only some subgroups may derive specific benefits from anthracyclines (although not conclusive)
Available non-anthra-based regimens may help us manage uncertainty while further data accumulate